Findings - DR - 2002 - DR-05-02 - Monument Sign For Cavallo Estates Subdivision At 3268 W Floating Feather Rd
BEFORE THE EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR
A DESIGN REVIEW FOR A MONUMENT SIGN
FOR CA VALLO ESTATES SUBDIVISION FOR
JOE GLAISYER/CAPITOL SECURITIES
)
)
)
)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CASE NUMBER DR-5-02
The above-entitled design review application came before the Eagle Design Review Board for their
action on February 14, 2002. The Eagle Design Review Board having heard and taken oral and written
testimony, and having duly considered the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law;
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
Joe Glaisyer/Capitol Securities, represented by David Koga with The Land Group, is
requesting design review approval of a monument sign for Cavallo Estates Subdivision.
The site is located on the northwest corner of Floating Feather Road and Meridian Road
at 3268 West Floating Feather Road.
B.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL:
The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on January 15,2002.
c.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners abutting the subject
property in accordance with Eagle City Code on January 25, 2002.
D.
HISTORY OF RELEVANT PREVIOUS ACTIONS:
On November 27, 2001, the Eagle City Council approved the preliminary plat for
Cavallo Estates Subdivision (PP-6-01).
E.
COMPANION APPLICATIONS:
DR-4-02 (Common area landscaping within Cavallo Estates Subdivision)
F.
ZONING DESIGNA nON:
R-E (Residential Estates).
Page 1 of 5
K:IPlanning DeptlEagle ApplicationsIDr\2002IDR-O5-02 sign drfdoc
G.
H.
I.
SIGNAGE:
Monument Sign
Sign Data Proposed Required
Sign Dimensions 5' high x 8 112' wide 8' high (maximum)
Area of Sign age 6.2-square feet (approx.) SO-square feet
Illumination One 70-watt metal halide lamp Interior-illumination prohibited
Sign Landscaping 12 I-square feet (approx.) l8.6-square feet (minimum)
AGENCY RESPONSES: None
LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC: None received to date
STAFF ANALYSIS PROVIDED WITIDN THE STAFF REPORT:
A.
B.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS, WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN
REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: (None)
ZONING CODE PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS
PROPOSAL:
.
The general theme of the Design Review Overlay District is to encourage the use of
American Northwest and 1870 through 1930 architectural styles and the use of those
materials, graphics and architectural designs set forth in the DR chapter.
.
Signage for any project shall provide for business identification and minimize clutter and
confusion on and off the site. Signs are to provide effective and necessary business
identification systems adapted to the building design.
.
Section 8-2A-8(K)(I)
No signs shall be erected or maintained in any district as established by the Zoning
Ordinance except those signs specifically enumerated in this Chapter. The number and
area of signs as outlined in this Chapter are intended to be maximum standards which do
not necessarily ensure architectural compatibility. Therefore, in addition to the
enumerated standards, consideration shall be given to a sign's relationship to the overall
appearance of the subject property as well as the surrounding community. Compatible
design, simplicity and sign effectiveness are to be used in establishing guidelines for
sign approval.
.
Section 8-4-4(A)(7)
Metal halide lighting shall be permitted with the following additional conditions:
a. Light wattage shall be a maximum of 320 watts.
b. The light fixture shall be no higher than seventeen feet (17').
c. The Design Review Board shall make the following findings prior to approving
metal halide lighting:
(I) The lighting shall be harmonious with and in accordance with the general
objectives, or with any specific objective of Chapter 2, Article A of this Title;
Page 2 of 5
K:IPlanning Dept\Eagle ApplicationslDr\2002IDR-OS-O2 sign drfdoc
(2) The lighting shall be installed, operated, and maintained to be harmonious
and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the
general vicinity and will not change the essential character of the same area; and
(3) The lighting will not be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses.
c.
DISCUSSION:
.
The applicant is proposing to use one 70-watt metal halide ground mounted light to
illuminate the monument sign. Per Eagle City Code, metal halide lighting requires Design
Review Board approval. The Board must find that metal halide lighting is harmonious with
the character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of the same
area. The street lights within the subdivision will be required to be high pressure sodium
lights. It is staffs opinion that the ground mounted light should be a high pressure sodium
light to remain consistent with other light proposed within the subdivision. The applicant
should be required to provide a revised detail of the light fixture showing the ground
mounted light fixture using a high pressure sodium luminarie. The detail should be reviewed
and approved by staff prior to issuance of a sign permit.
Staff defers comment regarding other design issues and color of all proposed signs to the
Design Review Board.
.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROVIDED WITHIN THE REPORT:
Based upon the information provided to staff to date, staff recommends approval with the site
specific conditions of approval and the standard conditions of approval provided within the staff
report.
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE BOARD:
A. A public hearing on the application was held before the Design Review Board on January 15,2002,
at which time testimony was taken and the public hearing was closed. The Board made their
decision at that time.
B. Oral testimony in opposition to this proposal was presented to the Design Review Board by no one.
C. Oral testimony in favor of this proposal was presented to the Design Review Board by no one (not
including the applicant).
BOARD DECISION:
The Board voted 3 to 0 (McCullough and Howard absent) to approve DR-5-02 for a design
review application for a monument sign with the following staff recommended site specific
conditions of approval and standard conditions of approval with text shown with strike thru to be
deleted by the Board.
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Provide a revised detail of the light fixture sflo'Ning the ground molH1ted light fixture using a ffigh
pressure sodium luminarie. The detail shall be revie':¡ed and approved by staff prior to issuanoe of a
sign permit.
2. The light fixtures shall be screened or located so they do not shine onto the roadway or onto any
nearby property. The light fixtures shall be concealed or screened with perimeter landscaping
Page 3 of 5
K:IPlanning DeptlEagle Applications\DrI2002IDR-O5-02 sign drfdoc
providing a l2-month screen of sufficient height and density to conceal such fixtures.
3. Interior illumination is not permitted for monument signs.
4. A sign permit is required prior to a sign being constructed on this site.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A building permit/zoning permit shall be required prior to construction of any sign which is
not attached to a building with an active building permit.
2. Approval shall expire without notice to the applicant on the date of expiration of this Design Review,
as stipulated in Eagle City Code (one year from the Design Review Board approval date).
3. The Americans with Disabilities Act, Uniform Building Code, Eagle City Code, and all applicable
County, State and Federal Codes and Regulations shall be complied with. All design and
construction shall be in accordance with all applicable City of Eagle Codes unless specifically
approved by the Commission and/or Council.
4. New plans which incorporate any required changes shall be submitted for staff approval. Staff may
elect to take those plans to the Design Review Board and/or the Planning and Zoning Commission
for review and approval.
5. Any changes to the plans and specifications upon which this approval is based, other than those
required by the above conditions, will require submittal of an application for modification and
approval of that application prior to commencing any change.
6. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or
other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest
advises the City of Eagle of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at
the time the change in use is sought.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on July 10, 2001.
2. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners abutting the subject property in
accordance with Eagle City Code on August 24, 2001.
3. The Board reviewed the particular facts and circumstances of this proposed design review
application (DR-S-02) with regard to Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-13 Design Review Board
Action, and based upon the information provided with the conditions required herein, concludes that
the proposed design review application is in accordance with the Eagle City Code.
The Design Review Board supports the selection of the metal halide light fixture because this fixture
is an isolated element at the entry to the subdivision and has very minimal impact to the overall
development. This fixture meets the criteria of Eagle City Code Section 8-4-4-2(A)(7) for the
following reasons:
Page 4 of 5
K:IPlanning DeptlEagle ApplicationslDr\2002IDR-O5-02 sign drfdoc
a.) The wattage is less than 320-watts.
b.) The fixture does not exceed l7-feet in height.
c.) The Design Review Board made the following findings prior to approving the metal halide
lighting:
(1) The lighting shall be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives, or
with any specific objective of Chapter 2, Article A of this Title. The Board does not
anticipate this light creating any disturbing or nuisances to future neighboring uses.
(2) The lighting shall be installed, operated, and maintained to be harmonious and
appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity and
will not change the essential character of the same area; and
(3) The lighting will not be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses.
The decision to allow the metal halide fixture is due to the color correctness of the light with respect
to the intended aging of the sign design. Approval of this metal halide lighting shall not be
considered as establishing a binding precedent to grant other metal halide lighting approvals in the
future.
DATED this 14th day of March 2002.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
OF THE CITY OF EAGLE
Ada C unty, Id
; .
ATTEST:
.. ""~..
, .~ OF lt1 ~"#~
Û" ~ """""'.0 '( ~
,. - eft~, ~
,. ? 0 It .. "',,'~ ..
o~ <'1' \ \
\C:. ~fI
* ,~::I!>"",,v J*
~,., ('! ...1 ß, l", Î
~r~;.J.~;"'¿", :;J.}-.;/','!
<:,¡¡;x>...,~",::.,.;,'""
&'...'..-i!!,....,..:,.c...,."....",.'.~,..~...~'.'.,J
"'-<:'.'. ""'~.1:.1:":"'.' ",-",-
".t:;;. O'-:;'?~-:!;~;~
"'" :."!\.-,-,,
-...~t>I '
ÄGA..' ~ ~~
Sharon K. Moore, Eagle City lerk
Page 5 of 5
K:IPlanning DeptlEagle ApplicationsIDr\2002IDR-O5-02 sign drf.doc