Findings - DR - 2001 - DR-58-01 - Construct 2 Building Wall Signs & 3 Directional Signs For Key Bank Facility
ORIGINAL
BEFORE THE EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR
A DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO BUILDING WALL
SIGNS AND THREE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR
THE KEY BANK FACILITY FOR KEY BANK
)
)
)
)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CASE NUMBER DR-58-01
The above-entitled design review application came before the Eagle Design Review Board for their
action on September 13,2001. The Eagle Design Review Board having heard and taken oral and written
testimony, and having duly considered the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law;
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
Key Bank, represented by Jeff Carico with Image National Signs, is requesting design
review approval to construct two building wall signs and three directional signs for the
Key Bank facility. The site is located on the north side of Chinden Boulevard
approximately 50-feet east of Eagle Road within Eagle Marketplace at 3410 East
Chinden Boulevard.
B.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL:
The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on August 9, 2001.
C.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners abutting the subject
property in accordance with Eagle City Code on August 24,2001.
D.
HISTORY OF RELEVANT PREVIOUS ACTIONS:
On March 13,2001, the Eagle City Council approved a conditional use application for a
bank facility with drive-up service (for ATM machine only) within the Eagle
Marketplace (CU-22-00).
On April 24, 2001, the Eagle City Council approved a design review application for a
bank facility with drive-up service (for ATM machine only) within the Eagle
Marketplace (DR-65-00).
E.
COMPANION APPLICATIONS: None
F.
ZONING DESIGNATION: C-1-DA (Neighborhood Business District with a development
agreement)
Page 1 of 5
K:\Planning Dept\Eagle ApplicationslDr1200 I\DR-S8-0 I sign drfdoc
G.
SIGNAGE:
Building Wall Sign (North Elevation)
Sign Data Proposed Required
Wall Sign Dimensions 5.71' high x 8.83' wide N/A
Area of Signage 50 AI-square feet 98-square feet (maximum)
Illumination Three - 150-watt incandescent lamps Interior-illumination prohibited
Sign Data Proposed Required
Wall Sign Dimensions 3.79' high x 5.875' wide N/A
Area of Signage 22.2-square feet 98-square feet (maximum)
Illumination Two - 150-watt incandescent lamps Interior-illumination prohibited
Building Wall Sign (South Elevation)
Sign Data Proposed Required
Sign Dimensions 3'highx2.2I' wide N/A
Area of Signage 15.9-square feet 50-square feet (maximum)
Illumination None Interior-illumination prohibited
Directional Signs (Three)
H.
AGENCY RESPONSES: None
1.
LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC: None received to date
STAFF ANALYSIS PROVIDED WITIDN THE STAFF REPORT:
A.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS, WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN
REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: (None)
B.
ZONING CODE PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS
PROPOSAL:
.
The general theme of the Design Review Overlay District is to encourage the use of
American Northwest and 1870 through 1930 architectural styles and the use of those
materials, graphics and architectural designs set forth in the DR chapter.
.
Signage for any project shall provide for business identification and minimize clutter and
confusion on and off the site. Signs are to provide effective and necessary business
identification systems adapted to the building design.
.
Section 8-2A-8(K)(I)
No signs shall be erected or maintained in any district as established by the Zoning
Ordinance except those signs specifically enumerated in this Chapter. The number and
area of signs as outlined in this Chapter are intended to be maximum standards which do
Page 2 of 5
K\Planning Dept\Eagle ApplicationslDrl2001\DR-58-01 sign drf.doc
not necessarily ensure architectural compatibility. Therefore, in addition to the
enumerated standards, consideration shall be given to a sign's relationship to the overall
appearance of the subject property as well as the surrounding community. Compatible
design, simplicity and sign effectiveness are to be used in establishing guidelines for
sign approval.
.
Section 8-2A-8(C)(5)
Sign materials and overall appearance shall compliment with the building architecture
and colors as determined by the Design Review Board.
.
Section 8-2A-8(C)(8)
Each business within a single building shall be allowed one wall sign for every street it
fronts and the entire building shall be permitted one monument sign for every street it
fronts. The sides of the building on which the signs are to be placed shall be shown by
the owner, but shall be as approved by the Design Review Board.
.
Section 8-2A-8(D)(3)
Directional signs within the boundaries of a shopping center are permitted only with the
approval of the Design Review Board.
C.
DISCUSSION:
.
The Key Bank facility is located within the Eagle Marketplace generally located on the
northeast comer of Eagle Road and Chinden Boulevard. The main entrance to this facility is
located on the north side of the building facing the parking lot of the Eagle Marketplace.
The only street frontage this building has is on the south side of the building, which faces
Chinden Boulevard. The applicant has proposed a wall sign on the north and south
elevations of the building. Per Eagle City Code each business within a single building is
permitted one wall sign for every street it fronts. The side of the building on which the sign
is to be place shall be shown by the owner but approved by the Design Review Board. The
building should be limited to one wall sign. The side of the building on which the sign is to
be located should be shown by the owner but should be reviewed and approved by the
Design Review Board prior to issuance of a sign permit.
The applicant is proposing three directional signs for the Key Bank facility. Per Eagle
directional signs within the boundaries of a shopping center are permitted only with the
approval of the Design Review Board.
Staff defers comment regarding design and color of all proposed signs to the Design Review
Board.
.
.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROVIDED WITHIN THE REPORT:
Based upon the information provided to staff to date, staff recommends approval with the site
specific conditions of approval and the standard conditions of approval provided within the staff
report.
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE BOARD:
A. A public hearing on the application was held before the Design Review Board on September 13,
2001, at which time testimony was taken and the public hearing was closed. The Board made their
Page 3 of 5
K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applicarions\Dr12001\DR-58-01 sign drfdoc
decision at that time.
B. Oral testimony in opposition to this proposal was presented to the Design Review Board by no one.
C. Oral testimony in favor of this proposal was presented to the Design Review Board by no one (not
including the applicant).
BOARD DECISION:
The Board voted 4 to 0 (Kenison absent) to approve DR-58-01 for a design review application
for two building wall signs and three directional signs with the following staff recommended site
specific conditions of approval and standard conditions of approval with text shown with strike
thru to be deleted by the Board and text shown with underline to be added by the Board.
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
+-. The building shall be limited to one ',vall sign. The side of the building on ',yhieh. the sign is to be
located shall be SbØ',vR by the O',\'Rer but shall be revie',ved and approved by the Design Review
Board prior tø issuance of a sign permit.
2. A sign permit is required prior to any signs being constructed on this site.
3. The si~a~e on the ATM machine shall be limited to I-foot in hei2ht and either the "Key" lo~o or
the words "Key Bank" shall be used on the upper portion of the ATM machine. The si~a~e located
on the bottom of the A TM machine is not approved and shall be eliminated.
4. The Desi~ Review Board reco~izes the uniqueness of this site and recommends that the applicant
be permitted to have two buildin~ wall si~s as proposed with this application.
Note: The reason for the Boards recommendation is because of the lack of space on the current
shopping center monument sign. The Board would support a modification to increase the height the
monument signs for the Marketplace at Eagle.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A building permit/zoning permit shall be required prior to construction of any sign which is
not attached to a building with an active building permit.
2. Approval shall expire without notice to the applicant on the date of expiration of this Design Review,
as stipulated in Eagle City Code (one year from the Design Review Board approval date).
3. The Americans with Disabilities Act, Uniform Building Code, Eagle City Code, and all applicable
County, State and Federal Codes and Regulations shall be complied with. All design and
construction shall be in accordance with all applicable City of Eagle Codes unless specifically
approved by the Commission and/or Council.
4. New plans which incorporate any required changes shall be submitted for staff approval. Staff may
elect to take those plans to the Design Review Board and/or the Planning and Zoning Commission
for review and approval.
5. Any changes to the plans and specifications upon which this approval is based, other than those
required by the above conditions, will require submittal of an application for modification and
Page 4 of 5
K:\Planning DeptlEagle ApplicationslDrl200IIDR-58-01 sign drf.doc
approval of that application prior to commencing any change.
6. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or
other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest
advises the City of Eagle of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at
the time the change in use is sought.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on August 9, 2001.
2. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners abutting the subject property in
accordance with Eagle City Code on August 24,2001.
3. The Board reviewed the particular facts and circumstances of this proposed design review
application (DR-58-01) with regard to Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-13 Design Review Board
Action, and based upon the information provided concludes that the proposed design review
application is in accordance with the Eagle City Code.
DATED this 11th day of October 2001.
ATTEST: ,~, ~
: G .It.. ~
~}-: ~~<
j ~1-L' ~ ~ ðf ,,° ,..~~
... q j
~P!,~
Page 5 of 5
K:\Planning DepllEagle Applicalions\DrI2001\DR-58-01 sign drf.doc