Loading...
Findings - PZ - 2001 - FPUD-4-01 - Fdp For Phase 1 Of 3 Mu Planned Devleopment/33 Acre Site ORIGINAL BEFORE THE EAGLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CAMILLE BECKMAN PUD PHASE 1 FOR FOAD AND SUSAN ROGHANI ) ) ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CASE NUMBER FPUD-4-01 The above-entitled final development plan application came before the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation on May 1,2001. The Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; FINDINGS OF FACT: A. PROJECT SUMMARY: Camille Beckman, represented by Chris Korte with Land Dynamics, is requesting final development plan approval for phase one of a three phase mixed use planned development. This phase will include a manufacturing, production, packaging, and office facility and related site improvements. The 33- acre site is located on the south side of State Highway 44 and east of the intersection with Park Lane. B. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL: The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on March 14,2001. c. illSTORY: The City Council approved the PUD for the Camille Beckman preliminary development plan on April 10,2001. D. PRELIMINARY PUD/PLAT FINDINGS: Council Findings and Conclusions dated April 10, 2001 are incorporated herein by reference. E. FINDINGS OF FACT REQUIRED BY EAGLE CITY CODE SECTION 8-6-6-3 B: The Commission shall find that the facts submitted with the application and presented to them establish that: 1. The proposed development can be initiated within one year of the date of approval; 2. Each individual unit of the development, as well as the total development, can exist as an independent unit capable of creating an environment of sustained desirability and stability or that adequate assurance will be provided that such objective will be attained and the uses proposed will not be detrimental to present and potential surrounding uses, but will have a beneficial effect which would not be achieved under standard district regulations; 3. The streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic, and increased densities will not generate traffic in such amounts as to overload the street network outside the PUD; 4. Any proposed commercial development can be justified at the locations proposed; 5. Any exception from standard district requirements is warranted by the design and other amenities incorporated in the final development plan, in accordance with the PUD and the adopted policy of the Council; 6. The area surrounding said development can be planned and zoned in coordination and Page 1 of 4 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\Preliminary Development Plans\2001\Camille Beckman fpud pzf.doc substantial compatibility with the proposed development; 7. The PUD is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and 8. The existing and proposed utility services are adequate for the population densities and nonresidential uses proposed. F. FINDINGS OF FACT REQUIRED BY EAGLE CITY CODE SECTION 8-6-6-3 (C): Upon granting or denying the application, the Council shall specify: 1. The ordinance and standards used in evaluating the application; 2. The reasons for approval or denial; and 3. The actions, if any, that the applicant could take to obtain a permit. STAFF ANALYSIS PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT: The City Engineer and Planning staff have reviewed the final development plan. It is staff s opinion that this final development plan can meet the Findings of Fact required in Eagle City Code Section 8-6-6-3 Band C (as noted herein) with the conditions recommended herein. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT: Staff recommends approval with the site specific conditions of approval and the standard conditions of approval provided within the staff report. REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION: A review by the Planning and Zoning Commission was completed on May 1, 2001. The Commission made their recommendation at that time. The minutes are incorporated herein by reference. COMMISSION DECISION: The Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of FPUD-4-0 1 for final development plan approval for Camille Beckman Phase One with the following staff recommended site specific conditions of approval. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Comply with the conditions noted in the April 26, 2001 letter from the City Engineer. (Note: The items listed on the City Engineer's letter shall be submitted and reviewed by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permits rather than signature on the final plat since a plat is not required to be filed for this project in its current form.) 2. Comply with all applicable conditions of CU-21-00/PPUD-8-00. 3. Comply with the conditions ofDR-I-O1. 4. Provide an approval letter from lID regarding the proposed design of the driveway access to State Highway 44 prior to issuance of any building permits. 5. Provide a recorded license agreement, approved by ITD and/or ACHD, allowing the right-of- way between this site and the edge of pavement along State Highway 44 and N. Park Lane to be landscaped, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 6. All pathways and meandering sidewalks as shown for phase one shall be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 7. The applicant shall submit payment to the City for all Engineering fees incurred for reviewing this project, prior to the issuance of any building permits. Page 2 of 4 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\Preliuùnary Development Plans\ZOOI\Cauùlle Beckman fpud pzf.doc CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: A. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on March 22, 2001. B. In accordance with Eagle City Code Section 8-6-6-3 B the Commission finds that the facts submitted with the application and presented to the Commission, with the conditions herein, establish that: 1. The proposed development can be initiated within one year of the date of approval based upon the testimony and documentation presented by the developer; 2. Each individual unit of the development, as well as the total development, can exist as an independent unit capable of creating an environment of sustained desirability and stability or that adequate assurance will be provided that such objective will be attained and the uses proposed will not be detrimental to present and potential surrounding uses, but will have a beneficial effect which would not be achieved under standard district regulations because of the conditions placed on this development; 3. The streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic, and the uses proposed for the site will not generate traffic in such amounts as to overload the street network outside the PUD based upon written responses received from the highway districts having jurisdiction; 4. The commercial development can be justified at the location proposed because the site is zoned for the proposed uses and will be guided through completion with a development agreement outlining the conditions of proper and desired development; 5. Any exception from standard district requirements is warranted by the design and other amenities incorporated in the final development plan, in accordance with the PUD and the adopted policy of the Council because the uniqueness of the site provides an inviting attraction which will increase business and the arts within the community; 6. The area surrounding said development can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with this development since it is designed to incorporate residential uses in addition to the commercial uses, and therefore transition into the planned residential areas surrounding the development; 7. The PUD is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and 8. The existing and proposed utility services are adequate for this proposal as noted by the agencies which will serve the development. Page 3 of 4 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\Preliminary Development Plans\200I\Camille Beckman fpud pzf.doc ~------ - ---~------~ -------~---- --~ DATED this 14th day of May 2001. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EAGLE Ada County, Idaho ~ 5/~/ ~7~h"ð'7U ~~5- U(CH- CH/1t~ <. John Franden, Chairman ATTEST: -~~~. -¥-~~ Sharon Moore, Eagle City Clerk Page 4 of 4 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\Preliminary Development Plans\200l\Camille Beckman fpud pzf.doc