Loading...
Findings - PZ - 1998 - V-1-98 - Decrease Minimum 20% Lot Coverage/435 S. Eagle Rd BEFORE THE EAGLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE FOR A REDUCTION OF THE MINIMUM LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENT, FROM 20% TO APPROXIMATELY 12.7% FOR ZAMZOW'S COMPANY ) ) ) ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CASE NUMBER V -1-98 The above-entitled variance application came before the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission for their recoIIU?endation on June 15, 1998. The Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; FINDINGS OF FACT: A. PROJECT SUMMARY: Zamzow's, represented by BRS Architects, is requesting a variance to decrease the minimum 20% lot coverage required for the 2.43-acre site located on the northwest comer of State Highway 44 and S. Eagle Road at 435 S. Eagle Road. B. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL: The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on May 14, 1998. C. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice of Public Hearing on the application for the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission was published in accordance for requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and the Eagle City ordinances on May 29, 1998. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners within three-hundred feet (300-feet) of the subject property in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and Eagle City Code on May 29, 1998. Requests for agencies' reviews were transmitted on May 15, 1998 in accordance with the requirements of the Eagle City Code. D. HISTORY OF PREVIOUS ACTIONS: None E. COMPANION APPLICATIONS: Rezone (RZ-4-98) & Conditional Use (CU-1-98) Page 1 of 10 \\Eagiel\voll\SHARED\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationsW ARIANCElV-I.98 pzf.doc F. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AND ZONING MAP DESIGNATIONS: COMPPLAN ZONING LAND USE DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Existing Central Business C-l (Neighborhood Vacant District & Publici Business District) & CBD Semi-Public (Central Business District - if approved) Proposed No Change No change Bank with drive-thru and a Zamzow's retail store North of site Central Business R-4 (Residential) Residences District South of site Publici Semi-Public C-l (Neighborhood State Highway 44 and and commercial Business District) Channel Center Commercial subdivision East of site Central Business CBD-DA (Central Albertson's with non- District & Publici Business District with conforming fuel island Semi -Public Development Agreement) and vacant land & A (Agriculture) West of site Central Business R-4 (Residential) Vacanti Residences District & Medium Density Residential (4- units per acre maximum) G. DESIGN REVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICT: CEDA (Community Entry Development Area). H. SITE DESIGN INFORMATION: SITE DATA PROPOSED REQUIRED Total Acreage of Site 2.43-acres .05-acres (minimum) Percentage of Site Devoted 12.7% 20% (minimum) to Building Coverage Page 2 of 10 l\Eagle I \voI1\SHARED\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationslV ARlANCEIV -1-98 pzf.doc I. EAGLE CITY CODE FOR WHICH THE V ARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED: Section 8- 2A -6 (D(3)( d) "Lot coverage by the footprint of the structure shall be a minimum of twenty percent (20%) and a maximum of eighty five percent (85%) in which case off-site parking shall be provided for." J. EAGLE CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-2, "RULES AND DEFINITIONS" - "VARIANCE" A modification of the requirements of this Title (ritle 8) as to the lot size, lot coverage, width, depth, front yard, side yard, rear yard, setbacks, parking space, height of buildings or other provision of this title (ritle 8) affecting the size or shape of a structure or the placement of the structure upon lots, or the size of the lots. A variance shall not be considered a right or a special privilege, but may be granted to an applicant onlv upon a showing of undue hardship because of characteristics of the site and that the variance is not in conflict with the public interest. K. IDAHO CODE TITLE 67-6516, "VARIANCE - DEFINITION - APPLICATION - NOTICE - HEARING" Each governing board shall provide as part of th zoning ordinance for the processing or applications for variance permits. A variance is a modification of the requirements of the ordinance as to lot size, lot coverage, width, depth, front yard, side yard, rear yard, setbacks, parking space, height of buildings, or other ordinance provision affecting the size or shape of a structure or the placement of the structure upon lots, or the size of lots. A variance shall not be considered a right or a special privilege, but may be granted to an applicant only upon a showing of undue hardship because of characteristics of the site and that the variance is not in conflict with the public interest. Prior to granting a variance, notice and an opportunity to be heard shall be provided to property owners adjoining the parcel under consideration. L. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION FOR THE VARIANCE: Need to preserve existing trees, odd lot shape due to Ballantine Canal, and proposed drive-thru lane for bank needing land area where building could have been- see attached letter from Billy Ray Strite dated April 28, 1998 M. AGENCY RESPONSES: The following agencies have responded and their correspondence is attached to the rezone staff report (RZ-4-98). Comments which appear to be of special concern are noted below: Ada County Highway District Central District Health Eagle Fire District Page 3 of 10 \\Eaglel Ivai I \SHARED\P&Z\Eagle Applications\V ARlANCE\V -1-98 pzf.doc Eagle Sewer District N. LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC: None received to date. O. REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR APPROV AL OF A VARIANCE: Eagle City Code Section 8-7-4-2 (B) (4): a) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district; b) That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title; c) That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; and d) That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. A variance shall not be granted unless the Council makes specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it which support conclusions that the above-mentioned standards and conditions have met by the applicant. (Ord. 40, 10-1978, rev. 9-1980) Eagle City Code 8-7-4-4 (B) Upon granting or denying an application, the Council shall specify: 1. The ordinance and standards used in evaluating the application; 2. The reasons for approval or denial; and 3. The actions, if any, that the applicant could take to obtain a variance. (Ord. 270, 5- 29-1996) STAFF ANALYSIS PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN Page 4 of 10 \\Eagle 1 Ivai I \SHARED\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationslV ARlANCEI V -1-98 pzf.doc REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: . SPECIAL AREAS OR SITES - POLICIES & GOALS #4. To preserve existing trees and natural growth wherever practicable and establish appropriate landscaping as a part of new developments. . NATURAL RESOURCESICOMMUNITY DESIGN - EAGLE TREE PLAN Goal: Establish and enhance areas of tree growth that will create beauty, add to a healthy environment and increase economic stability. #2. To create an urban forest that will help reduce air and noise pollution, conserve water and reduce soil erosion, assist in modifying the local climate, increase property values, and improve Eagle's economy by providing a pleasant and more comfortable place to shop and live. To encourage economic growth by establishing a more inviting atmosphere for locations of business. Objectives: #1. . AIR QUALITY - POLICY AND GOALS: #5. To establish and enhance areas of tree growth by creating an urban forest that will help reduce air pollution. . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP Shows portion of this property to be public/semi public. B. ZONING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: . Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-7(C) (1) Existing Vegetation: Retention Of Existing Trees: states in part. "Existing trees shall be retained unless removal is approved in writing by the City." . Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-6 (D(3)(d) "Lot coverage by the footprint of the structure shall be a minimum of twenty percent (20%) and a maximum of eighty five percent (85%) in which case off-site parking shall be provided for." C. DISCUSSION: . The proposal for a drive-thru does not meet the criteria for justification of a variance Page 5 of 10 l\Eagle l\voll \SHARED\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationsW ARIANCEI V -1-98 pzf.doc since it is not a special condition/circumstance peculiar to this site. However, there are three special conditionslcircumstances peculiar to this site that staff believes warrant a reduction in the minimum lot coverage. Those are: 1. A constrained, odd shaped area at the west end of the parcel; 2. An area needed for preservation of existing trees; and 3. An area shown on Comprehensive Plan to be PubliclSemi Public -landscape area-. These areas, and calculations leading to staff s recommended lot coverage reduction, are shown on Exhibit "A" attached to this staff report. Staff recommends a reduction of the minimum required lot coverage from 20% to 13 %. (This would require 13,700 square feet of building.) There is sufficient room on the property for 13,700 square feet of building and 55 parking spaces that would be required at a ratio of one space per 250 square feet. Depending on how the site is laid out, the property might not be able to accommodate a drive-thru facility. In any case, approval or denial of such a use is not the subject of this application but would be the subject of a separate conditional use and/or design review application. . Other than the landscape area shown on Comprehensive Plan to be PubliclSemi Public as depicted on Exhibit "A" attached, the remaining bufferllandscape area along the Alternate Route (approximately 50-feet in width) should be determined upon review of any Design Review and/or Conditional Use permit application for this site. A pathway extending west from Eagle Road in this location is not practical because there are existing residential developments to the west which would block the pathway. There is a pathway on the south side of the alternate route in this location. Since the landscape/buffer area along the alternate route was planned for a pathway, as well as a landscape/buffer area, staff believes that the width should be reduced upon review of any development proposed for this site since the pathway is not feasible. . Staffhas reviewed the particular facts and circumstances of this proposed variance and, in terms of Eagle City Code Section 8-7-4-2 (B) (4) (a, b, c, & d) (required findings for approval of a variance), has made the following conclusions: a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land involved, and which are not applicable to other lands in the same district because, there is a constrained, odd shaped area at the west end of the parcel, there is a large area needed for preservation of existing trees; and there is an area shown on Comprehensive Plan to be Public/Semi Public -landscape area-; Page 6 of 10 \\Eagle 1 Ivai I \SHARED\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationsW ARIANCEI V -1-98 pzf.doc needed for preservation of existing trees; and there is an area shown on Comprehensive Plan to be Public/Semi Public -landscape area-; b) A literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title because it is doubtful that any other properties in this district have the three special and specific site conditions and circumstances which are noted in finding "a" above; c) Special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant since the applicant did not cause the lot to be oddly shaped, since the trees have been at this site for years, and since the publiclsemi public area at the southeast comer of the site is required by the City's Comprehensive Plan and was not a proposal by the applicant. (NOTE: This finding could not be met if the justification for the variance was based on the applicants proposal for a drive-thru facility); and d) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district because, if the same circumstances existed at another site, the applicant for development of that site would most likely be granted the same privilege depending on the particular circumstances of the application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT: Based upon the information provided to staff to date staff recommends approval of a reduction of the minimum lot coverage requirement with the conditions provided within the staff report. PUBLIC HEARING OF THE COMMISSION: A. A public hearing on the application was held before the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 15, 1998, at which time testimony was taken and the public hearing was closed. The Commission made their recommendation at that time. B. Oral testimony in opposition to the applicant's request to not comply with the land use map requirement for public/semi public space at the southeast comer of the site was presented by three individuals before the Planning and Zoning Commission. They voiced concerns regarding the City adhering to their requirements for the on-site landscaping and green space required by the Comprehensive Plan. They felt that the integrity of the landscaping would be compromised if the publici semi-public space required by the Comprehensive Plan was decreased due to landscaping being proposed off-site within the right-of-way. They stated Page 7 of 10 l\Eagle I \voll \SHARED\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationsW ARlANCEW -1-98 pzf.doc that there would be a lack of control by the City to keep the off-site landscaping that would be in the right-of-way. C. Oral testimony in favor of the application was presented by no one before the Planning and Zoning Commission COMMISSION DECISION: The Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommended approval of V -1-98 for a variance to decrease the minimum required lot coverage from 20% with the following site specific conditions of approval. Text shown with strike-thru was deleted from staffs recommendations and text shown with underline was added to staffs recommendations. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A reduction from the 20% minimum lot coverage required to 13% is granted. The square footage for building(s) at this site shall total a minimum of 13,700 square feet. 2. No land use is approved with this application. Separate Design Review and/or Conditional Use permit applications will be required for any proposed buildingslland uses. 3. A landscaped area, generally as shown attached Exhibit "A", shall be provided at the existing trees shown the Exhibit and the trees shall be preserved. 4. .^. lanàseaf>eà area, afJfJrmdmately 11,000 S~l:1are feet ia size, saan Be fJreviàeà 'lIitæa the area saøvVÐ. ea tRe CøHlfreae!Dsive Plan as Pl:1èlie/Seæi Pl:1èlie (mere sfJeeifieally as Saø'.'.1B ØD attaelleà EJdiiBit ".^.."). 5. OtRef tRaB tRe laBàseafJe area reE}Hireà as aøteà ÌR site Sf)eeifie eøaàiâøa #4 abeve ~Ihe width of the remaining bufferllandscape area along the Alternate Route (shown on the Comprehensive Plan as approximately 50-feet in width) shall be àeteræiaeà 1:If)øa r0>lÌew øf aÐ.Y Desiga Re'/Ïe\': aBàfør Cøaàitiøaal Use permit afJ13lieatiea fer this site a minimum of 20- feet in width. 6. Compliance with any applicable Eagle City Codes and/or Comprehensive Plan provisions will be required at the time an application is submitted for any buildingsluses for the property. 7. Provide a license agreement, approved by ITD and/or ACHD, allowing the right-of-way between this site and the edge of pavement along State Highway 44 and Eagle Road to be landscaped. Page 8 of 10 H:\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationsW ARIANCEI V -1-98 pzf.doc CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on May 14, 1998. 2. Notice of Public Hearing on the application for the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission was published in accordance for requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and the Eagle City ordinances on May 29, 1998. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners within three-hundred feet (300-feet) of the subject property in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and Eagle City Code on May 29, 1998. Requests for agencies' reviews were transmitted on May 15, 1998 in accordance with the requirements of the Eagle City Code. 3. The Commission reviewed the particular facts and circumstances of the proposed variance (V-1-98) in terms of Eagle City Code Section 8-7-4-2 (B) (4), "Required findings for approval of a variance" and has concluded that: a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land involved, and which are not applicable to other lands in the same district because, there is a constrained, odd shaped area at the west end of the parcel, there is a large area needed for preservation of existing trees, and there is a IS-foot wide no-build easement along the buried Ballantyne Irrigation Company pipe along the north property line of the site; b) A literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title because the three special and specific site conditions and circumstances, which are noted in finding "a" above, are a hardship to this site and are not likely to be occurring on other sites in this district; c) Special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant since the applicant did not cause the lot to be oddly shaped, since the trees have been at this site for years, and since the Ballantyne Company easement has also been at this site for years. (NOTE: This finding could not be met ifthe justification for the variance was based on the aP9licants 1;Jroposal for a drive-thru facility); and Page 9 of 10 \\Eaglel\vol1\SHARED\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationsW ARIANCEW-I-98 pzf.doc d) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district because, if the same circumstances existed at another site, the applicant for development of that site would most likely be granted the same privilege depending on the particular circumstances of the application. DATED this 29th day of June, 1998. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EAGLE Ada County, Idaho ATTEST: a(\1:"~~"'f~4- ð"" Or,.' "',~ .~## ,.. ¿ """"'... . .... ;#" ,,;," <\' -&'D'oH>.'" "~.~( ":. II ~ ,,'1'/"- ""'""", '-".. .:tJ" ...on ...'I;.~'", .. "~~ '-'<1 .. .". . If:' c .~ A '" ~ .. iii V "'-9" :: * ~ _0 - ~¡ ..,1,., : .. ~ . i.. to = .. g . .. ~ \~ SE...J\L ~.t : ~ .(0 ~.: .. .r\.~" ,?- ",iQ ~ "" " ~ ""'p. "e";:UR.f\'\. ,,;,v ~1.:..\",. .... ~#. ~~ ....".~"..~ ~.~~" #_'" ~ 0';:;' ~;~ o¡...." ." .. ~'1" ~'.al""'" Page 10 of 10 l\Eagle! IvaI I \SHARED\P&Z\Eagle ApplicationsW ARIANCE\1998W -1-98 pzf.doc