Loading...
Minutes - 2025 - City Council - 07/08/2025 - RegularEAGLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 8, 2025 1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pike leads the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Pike calls the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: GINDLESPERGER, MAY, RUSSELL, KVAMME A quorum is present. 4. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE AGENDA: None 5. REPORTS: A. Mayor and Council: Gindlesperger said that Eagle Fun Days was a huge success. May reports on her participation in the Idaho Patriot Thunder Motorcycle rally. She attended the COMPASS Executive Board meeting. She also compliments Ken Acuff, the Water Superintendent and Jeremy Friton, Water Lead who gave a tour of the Eagle City Water facilities. May also compliments the Eagle Fire Department for their various acts of service to our wonderful community. May would like to add public comment back on the agenda at least once, with the consent of fellow Council members, in an effort to dissuade the misinformation that is circulating in our community. Kvamme also compliments the success of Eagle Fun Days, the parade was very well attended and enjoyed greatly by the community. Mayor Pike states there have been discussion of adding public comment onto the agendas, and he'd be happy to accommodate that if it is the desire of the Council. Pike states that the Council has been having budget workshops and encourages the public to attend those. Eagle Fun Days was a large success. The safety efforts implemented were excellent this year. B. Department Supervisor: No reports. C. Eagle Police Department: Chief Travis Ruby reviews local law enforcement activities. 7. CONSENT AGENDA: ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ACTION ITEMS. Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless the Mayor, a Councilmember, member of City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the City Council. Any item on the Consent Agenda which contains written Conditions of Approval from the City of Eagle City Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission, or Design Review Board shall be adopted as part of the City Council's Consent Agenda approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise. A. Claims Against the City. B. Minutes of June 18, 2025. (TEO) C. Minutes of June 25, 2025. (TEO) D. Request for Qualifications (RFO) for Construction Managmment & General Contractor Services for Eagle City Athletic Park: Staff is seeking approval to begin the Request for Qualification process for Construction Management and General Contractor Services for the Eagle City Athletic Park. (TEO) Page 1 K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-07-08-25min.docx E. Development Agreement for RZDA-2024-03 - Riverbend Commons Subdivision: Council authorization for Mayor to execute the development agreement associated with the Riverbend Commons Subdivision (RZDA-2024-03). The 14.00-acre site is comprised of six (6) parcels and is generally located 1,500-feet southwest of the intersection of State Highway 44 and South Urban Gate Avenue at 2603, 2611, 2755 and 2785 West State Street. (DLM) F. DR-2025-31 - Common Area Landscaping, Amenities, and Entry Feature within Terra View South Subdivision - Terra View 44 LLC: Terra View 44, LLC, represented by Jaime Snyder with Ardurra, is requesting design review approval for the common area landscaping, amenities, and entry feature within Terra View South Subdivision. The 170-acre site is located on the northeast corner of West Broken Arrow Street and State Highway 16 between West Broken Arrow Street and West Beacon Light Road. (ERF) G. DR-2025-33 - Common Area Landscaping within Valnova Estates Subdivision No. 2 - Lots 28 and 29 - Clyde Capital Group: Clyde Capital Group, represented by Eric Langvardt with Langvardt Design Group, is requesting design review approval of the common area landscaping within Valnova Estates Subdivision No. 2 — Lots 28 and 29 (Spring Valley PUMP No. 1). The 128.16 -acre site is located approximately 890 -feet northwest of the intersection of Aerie Way and Linder Road (approximately 1.4-miles east of State Highway 16) (Ada County Parcel #'s R8954703200, R8954703300, R8954703400, and R8954703500). (BAW) H. DR-2025-29 - Emergency Services Building for Eagle Fire Station No. 2 and Bureau of Land Management - Eagle Fire Department: Eagle Fire Department, represented by Joshua Gregoire with Cushing Terrell, is requesting design review approval of an 18,345-square foot, single story, emergency services building for Eagle Fire Station No. 2 and Burau of Land Management. The 4.40-acre site is located at 12655 North Horseshoe Bend Road approximately 500-feet south of East Beacon Light Road. (BAW) I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Approval of FPUD-2025-02/FP-2025-03 - Final Development Plan and Final Plat for Everton Subdivision No. 3 - DFC Eagledale, LLC: DFC Eagledale, LLC, represented by Cheryl Heath with KM Engineering, LLP, is requesting final development plan and final plat approvals for Everton Subdivision No. 3, a 51-lot (44- buildable, 7-common) residential planned unit development. The 14.41-acre site is located on the east side of North Palmer Lane approximately 1,250-feet north of State Highway 44. (ASG) J. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Approval of PP-2022-12-MOD1 - Valnova Lot 19 Subdivision Modification - Clyde Capital Group, LLC: Clyde Capital Group, LLC, represented by Landon Northey, is requesting modification of the preliminary plat approval for Valnova Lot 19 Subdivision (previously approved as the Valnova Lot 17 Subdivision), a re - subdivision of Lot 19, Block 1, Spring Valley Subdivision No. 1. The applicant is requesting to modify the preliminary plat to reduce the buildable lot count by twelve (12) units and to revise the land use sub -district designation of those lots from Single Family Attached (SFA) to Single Family Special Lot (SFSL). The preliminary plat was approved as a 196-lot (188-residential, 8-common) subdivision. The 61.81-acre site is generally located 1-mile southeast of the intersection of Big Gulch Parkway at the future Linder Road extension. (DLM) K. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Approval of FPUD-2025-03/FP-2025-04 - Final Development Plan and Final Plat for Everton Subdivision No. 4 - DFC Eagledale, LLC: DFC Eagledale, LLC, represented by Cheryl Heath with KM Engineering, LLP, is requesting final development plan and final plat approvals for Everton Subdivision No. 4, a 46-lot (40- buildable [33 residential, 7 commercial], 6-common) residential planned unit development. The 12.83-acre site is located on the northeast corner of North Palmer Lane and State Highway 44. (ASG) L. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Approval of RZ-2017-04 MOD4 - Modification to Development Agreement - Mustang Crossing Eagle, LLC: Mustang Crossing Eagle, LLC, represented by Stephanie Hopkins with KM Engineering, is requesting a modification to the rezone with development agreement for Bronco Acres Subdivision to modify the concept plan by changing the proposed lot configuration and by adding an additional commercial building. The 9.97-acre site is located on the north side of State Highway 44, approximately 175 feet east of North Park Lane. (KRD) Page 2 KACOUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-07-08-25min.docx M. FP-2025-12 - Final Plat for Valnova Subdivision No 3 - Clyde Capital Group, LLC• Clyde Capital Group, LLC, represented by Landon Northey, is requesting final plat approval for Valnova Subdivision No. 3 (a res-subdivision of Lot 42, Block 1, Valnova Subdivision No. 1, which was a re -subdivision of Lot 17, Block 1, Spring Valley Subdivision No. 1). Valnova Subdivision No. 3 is a 45-lot (40-residential, 5-common [2-private alley]) subdivision. The 6.92-acre site is generally located 1-mile southeast of the intersection of Big Gulch Parkway at the future Linder Road extension. (DLM) Mayor Pike introduces the item. Kvamme would like 6F removed. Zoning Administrator Vaughan would also like item 6F removed and tabled to the next regular meeting to allow staff more time to work with the applicant on a couple of items. Mayor Pike requests a motion for Consent Agenda items A-M, excluding F So moved by Gindlesperger. Seconded by May. GINDLERSPERGER, AYE; MAY, AYE; RUSSELL, AYE; KVAMME, AYE. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES. Mayor Pike introduces item 6F. Kvamme moves to pull agenda item 6F to the next Council meeting. Seconded by May. GINDLERSPERGER, AYE; MAY, AYE; RUSSELL, AYE; KVAMME, AYE. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. ACTION ITEM: Crowfoot Ranee Inc. Presentation. Representatives from Crowfoot Range Inc. are requesting this time be tabled for a presentation at a later date. Public comment will be taken on this item. (BKP) Mayor Pike introduces the item, and notes that representatives from Crowfoot Range, Inc. has requested this be continued. Mayor also notes that Council Member Russell's motion requested that a presentation by Director of Long -Range Planning and Projects, Nichoel Baird Spencer be given on the City owned Shooting Range, however Ms. Baird Spencer was previously approved to be off today and therefore is not available to present. Mayor Pike states that Council Member Russell also had posed several questions which he is prepared to answer tonight should Council desire. Russell moves to continue this item to a date to be determined later. Seconded by Gindlesperger. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES. Mayor Pike states as this was noticed for public comment, he would still like to give the public the opportunity to speak should they wish, with the understanding that a full presentation will be at a later date. No one chooses to speak. 8. NEW BUSINESS: A. ACTIONITEM: Presentation of the Conceptual Design for the City Maintenance Facility. (ELZ) Mayor Pike introduces the item. Director of Public Works, Eric Ziegenfuss reviews the conceptual design which addresses the needs and wants of the City of Eagle Water Department, Public Works and Eagle Fire District. The total Page 3 K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-07-08-25min.docx build out cost is $11,254,686.54. This number came in significantly higher than anticipated, so Director Ziegenfuss and Chief Lewis have been working on a phased approach to construction. Ziegenfuss and Lewis review options for construction phasing. General discussion regarding phasing options and pricing. Chief Lewis discusses other options for the esthetic treatment on the buildings. Russell would like to have the PowerPoint provided to Council to give them more time to review and digest the information. May concurs, that they would like more time before Council makes a determination. May compliments Director Ziegenfuss on the presentation and the time and effort put into this presentation. Mayor Pike requests a motion to continue to move this item forward, with more information being brought back for action. So moved by Russell. Seconded by May. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES. B. ACTION ITEM: Authorizing the City to Join the Magic Valley Coalition of Counties: A coalition focused on expanding broadband access and advancing digital equity. (ELZ) Mayor Pike introduces the item. Director Ziegenfuss states that the direction of the Council was for staff to investigate public/private partnerships to move the city's fiber network forward. The Mayor and Director Ziegenfuss met with multiple entities, and the entity has risen to the top to partner with on this venture. Berm Brocksome, this request is to join the coalition. Over $700 million dollars of federal funding has been distributed to the State of Idaho and subsequently forwarded to communities throughout the state over the last couple of years. BEAD funding is scheduled to be distributed to Idaho in the amount of approximately $580+ million. New guidelines have recently been established which have altered about three years of planning, so there are some urgent changes that are now being addressed. The Coalition's name is morphing as it is expanding outside of the Magic Valley. The Coalition was formed to pool resources. There is no financial outlay at this time, the City gains a lot of community support throughout the state, access to pooled resources and additional guidance. Currently Eagle does appear to have areas of under service that would qualify them for BEAD dollars. Discussion. Russell moves to authorize the City to join the Magic Valley Coalition of Counties. Seconded by May. GINDLERSPERGER, AYE; MAY, AYE; RUSSELL, AYE; KVAMME, AYE. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES. MOTION CARRIES. C. ACTION ITEM: AEreement for Professional Services: An agreement between the City of Eagle and River Oaks Communications Corporations for services associated with progressing the City's fiber network via public -private partnership with an open access approach. Services include review of current City telecommunications code, system status and drafting of a request for proposal for design, construction and management of an enhanced City fiber ring as well as other services. (ELZ) Mayor Pike introduces the item. Director of Public Works, Ziegenfuss provides an overview of the professional services agreement. Page 4 K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-07-08-25min.docx Council Member May expresses concerns with the draft agreement. Director Ziegenfuss, the City Attorney and River Oaks Communication Corporation held a conference call yesterday to discuss the agreement. May expresses several concerns she has with the draft contract and reviews the same. May sates that there are some checks and balances that should be included as well. Kvamme also has items he discussed with Director Ziegenfuss that he would like addressed. Discussion with Mr. Brocksome, Director Ziegenfuss, City Attorney and Council. Russell moves to approve an agreement for Professional Services between the City of Eagle and River Oaks Communications Corporation with revisions to be reviewed by Council and the Mayor. Seconded by May. GINDLESPERGER, AYE; MAY, AYE; RUSSELL, AYE; KVAMME, AYE. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES. 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 74-206 (1) An executive session at which members of the public are excluded may be held, but only for the purposes and only in the manner set forth in this section. The motion to go into executive session shall identify the specific subsections of this section that authorize the executive session. There shall be a roll call vote on the motion and the vote shall be recorded in the minutes. An executive session shall be authorized by a two- thirds (2/3) vote of the governing body. An executive session may be held: (f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. The mere presence of legal counsel at an executive session does not satisfy this requirement Gindlesperger moves pursuant to I.C. 74-206(1) that the City of Eagle convene an Executive Session for the purpose of (f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. Seconded by May. GINDLESPERGER, AYE; RUSSELL, AYE; MAY, AYE; KVAMME, AYE. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES. Council enters executive session. Discussion of pending/threatened litigation. Council exits executive session. A. ACTIONITEM.- Action Rej!ardinj! Pending/Threatened Litigation. No action 10. ADJOURNMENT: May moves to adjourn. Seconded by Gindlesperger. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES. Hearing no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned. Page 5 KACOUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-07-08-25min.docx r submitted: E. OSBORN, CMC . - 0, •• Eq�'•.• APPROVED: = ,� : S E A L o B PIKE, MAYOR AN AUDIO RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD AT WWW.CITYOFEAGLE.ORG. Page 6 K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-07-08-25min.docx Tracy Osborn From: Manuela Walter <mwalter.1327@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, July 7, 2025 9:58 PM To: Elected Officials Subject: Avimor's Crowfoot Shooting Range - Oppose Eagle Investing $250K Mayor Pike and City Council Members, I am writing in opposition to the request by the Crowfoot Shooting Range for the City of Eagle to make a $250K "donation" to their range. As was mentioned at the last City Council meeting, and I believe also at the recent Eagle Town Hall meeting, the Crowfoot range will be built regardless of whether the City of Eagle invests the money. I realize that there are Eagle residents who were looking forward to the Eagle Shooting Range being developed and that the current and possible future litigation may tie up its development for years. It was mentioned that investing in the Crowfoot range would give Eagle residents an option for an outdoor range while the Eagle range is up in the air. There are other outdoor ranges within driving distance that people like me who like to shoot can go to. Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars is a lot of money which could be better spent elsewhere in Eagle. I do not see any overwhelming benefit or return on investment that would make it worthwhile for Eagle to spend this amount of money on Crowfoot. Those interested need not be residents of Avimor to purchase a membership. There is only a fifty dollar per year difference for non-Avimor residents. Thank you, Manuela Walter Eagle resident 1 Tracy Osborn From: Alan Carwile <alan.d.carwile@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 7, 2025 11:23 PM To: Elected Officials Subject: Please do not use city funds for the shooting range I'm a resident of Eagle. I'd like to express my opinion about the city providing funds for the proposed shooting range. I believe the city should NOT provide funds to this project. The city has plenty of more important matters needing funding. I'd prefer to see increases in funding for parks, trails, libraries, and similar items, which can be appreciated by everyone. A shooting range is not something that all residents of the city would use. So - NO on financial support to the proposed shooting range. Thanks, Alan Carwile alan.d.carwile@gmail.com July 8, 2025 Eagle City Council Testimony regarding Crowfoot Shooting Range discussion To the Mayor and City Council Members, RECEIVED €s FILED CITY OF EAGLE .JUL U b 2025 File: Route to: I live directly west across Willow Creek Road from the Eagle Shooting Range area. It's less than 1,800 feet from the proposed shooting range alleys. I've already voiced my opposition to this idea, as have countless other neighbors in our area when public input was given at City Council meetings. At one particular meeting, of which the meeting room was filled with people- the overwhelming majority of those present were opposed to the current location of the Shooting Park. The City's survey conducted prior to voting on the Shooting Park indicated that the majority of those surveyed wanted a shooting range close to Eagle. But the survey itself did not inform people of the proximity of this proposal to existing homeowners. Furthermore, the open house that was offered by the city on the shooting range specifics and location information did not correlate with the information provided voters on the survey. Voters would only have seen the location of the range if they attended the open house. The City has been disingenuous in saying "the majority of the voters want the shooting range". Yes, voters did indicate support of a shooting range, but they did not indicate support of a range so close to homes! So to summarize- I am writing in support of the funding of the Crowfoot Shooting Range proposal. I also am opposed to further development of the Eagle Shooting Park shooting range area other than its current status as an Archery Range. The Crowfoot proposal is not close to already existing homes as compared to the Eagle Shooting Park proposal. The Eagle Shooting Park proposal overrides other uses in the area, due to safety issues, sound effects and general public use of the area that has been enjoyed for many years by equestrians, hikers, bikers, and outdoor enthusiasts. The existing Archery range at the Eagle Shooting Park does not interfere with other means of use. Eagle is known for its small ranchette horse ownership. Why would you be in favor of something that would basically remove a rare opportunity for equestrian use? These users are interested in appropriate behavior and care of the environment in this area. Hikers and equestrians alike have been sharing the area. Why take away the enjoyment of other uses to only allow shooting? An archer most likely wouldn't enjoy hearing all of the gun shot sound while using the archery range either. The City of Eagle already owes a substantial sum of money for the re -design of the shooting range. The Crowfoot range is already in existence and is a more accessible and similar distance from the Eagle area than the Shooting Park location. Pay off the Shooting Park bill and leave it as an Archery only park. Then, move forward with identifying the Crowfoot range as Eagle's Shooting Park. Thank you for your regards to this issue. Sincerely, /r Matt Siron 1050 W Calleghen Ln Eagle, ID W Tracy Osborn From: John Collins <johnnycollins911 @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 4:07 PM To: Elected Officials Subject: Crowfoot / $250K Donation Dear Council Members and Mayor I wanted to voice my concern about your intentions to donate $250k of our tax dollars to Crowfoot Range Inc, what appears to be a non profit startup limited use shooting range. The process so far has had zero public input. It appears there are some possible violations as well with the process and communications. I will be looking into this further but wanted to let you know I will be watching and spreading awareness to other Eagle tax paying citizens. We already have an Eagle shooting complex/ range project in the works that I have spent many hours attending open houses and council meetings to support. Best Regards John Collins Eagle tax paying resident July 8, 2025 PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN-UP 7A: Crowfoot Range Inc Presentation *Crowfoot Range Inc has requested this item be tabled for a presentation at a later date Time is allotted on the agenda at the end of the council meeting. Time is limited to three (3) minutes per individual. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY NAME ADDRESS More on Back 7A: Crowfoot Range Inc Presentation *Crowfoot Range Inc has requested this item be tabled for a presentation at a later date Time is allotted on the agenda at the end of the council meeting. Time is limited to three (3) minutes per individual. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY NAME ADDRESS TOPIC More on Back 7/1-5/2025 '3 "Shop" Smart Reviewing Design Renderings and Phased Approaches Before We Build 1 How Did We Get Here ? 2 1 7/15/2025 BuRding for the Future Current Facility Being Removed In Future Park Development Poor Access to Internet and Cell Services Extensive Distance to Other Facilities Insecure Property Residential Building Not Designed for Industrial Use No Designated Chemical Storage Dilapidated Buildings Growing Population Growing Acres Maintained by the City More Parks Coming Imminently Outgrown Our Space Congested City Hall Parking / Staff Space Travel & Cost Savings With New Location Time Efficiency Savings For Staff Bulk Purchasing & Storage Savings For The City Combining efforts of the Fire, Water, and Public Works Departments. Features that each department is requesting, with "wants" and "needs" designations and color coding. A detailed breakdown of each feature detailing why it's needed, how it will benefit the city, and how it will be operated between the departments. 4 2 7/15/2025 TODAY Design Visualizations Proposed Phasing Plans Budget Comparison What We're Asking Today Next Steps Visualizations K.Ns•. . 3 7/15/2025 A. Office Building View From Horsehoe Bend Rd. 7 r i <.r NOUN - Office Building View Towards BMX Track I 4 7/15/2025 Office Building and Shop Space View From Burn Building Cold Storage Buildings 10 7/15/2025 Northeast Storage Building 11 Full Build Out 12 1.9 7/15/2025 Top of Burn Building Full Buildout 360 Corner of Office Building Looking to the Burn Building 360 Northeast Corner of Full Build Out View from Second Entrance on front of Storage Buildings 13 Proposed Phasing Plans 14 N 7/15/2025 • ! Z c; `\ ✓fir r - ! .' > _ • YZ' Y •ls .I �� i ` �� {, ,�.,�, r �yh• ' ' F AAV' ., t Full BuRdou a� 15 Full Build Scope SITE IMPROVEMENTS UTILITIES Looping of Water Main Extension of sewer services Idaho Power service upgrade Communications Natural Gas DRAINAGE Underground facilities within the site Drainage basin at southwest corner of property near secondary access EARTHWORK Cut of approximately 32,000 CY with an export of around 20,000 CY from site ACCESS Two access points from Old Horseshoe Bend Road -Confirmed to meet ACHD Policy provided existing approach on the opposite side to the existing fire station is closed. North access -to serve as main entrance for public and employees South access -secondary access for delivery and equipment access PARKING Provide parking at the north entrance (13 spaces) for public and visitor parking for trainingevents Use BMX parking lot for overflow parking during scheduled training events FENCING Black wrought Iron (8' high) along frontage; Black -coated chain link (81) around the remainder of the property LANDSCAPE/BUFFER REQUIREMENTS Complywith City Code along Old Horseshoe Bend Road- 1Tree and 10 shrubs every 35'a long frontage Plan for XerIscape along existing pathway 16 l •TI 4i �'y,'�jmj{,� ,' ,psi 1•.•',3�. SCOPE OF FULL BUILD Two (2) Cold Storage Buildings (40 x 120) One (1)Truck/Trailer Storage (50 x 120) One (1) Equipment Storage (25 x 120) One (1) Shop Building with attached office and shared facilities with Eagle Fire District and City of Eagle One (1) Conex Fire Training Facility Building (3 Story, approximately 50' x 50'); Total area planned for the building and surrounding space Is 175' x 175' A car extrication area (50 x 100) A roof prop vent area (50 x 50) A draft tank (20 x 20, underground out of vehicular path) rA 7/15/2025 17 Needs Met by the Full Build Out Estimated Cost $11,255,000 © © ® • Burn Facility ❑F © ® • Carpentry Bay with Air Compressor ❑F 13 ® • Chemical Storage ©� 0 • Clean Classroom ©©© • Confined Space Practice Area © 1 ® • Covered Equipment Parking © [ © • Dirty Classroom © [ ® • Employee Break Area ❑F [ ® • Fuel Pump Station ❑F ©® • Greenhouse ©� © • Locker Room ❑F ©® • Manicured Field ❑F ® • Metalworking/Welding Bay ❑F © ® • Natural Field © 13 © • Office Space ©p ©• Parking Lot 0 0 ©• Restrooms © [2 ©• Secure Yard with Gated Entry ©• Security Monitoring System ❑F ©• Shipping & Receiving Bay © • Storage Building © 1 © • Training Ground © ©® • Training Gym © ©® • Training Tower ❑F © ® • Tree Farm 0 © ® • Vehicle Extrication Pad ❑F 13 © • Vehicle Service Bay with Lift © © ® • Ventilation Prop Area [F]0©•Wash Bay ❑F 13 © • Workstations Finish 2nd Floor Office Add $465,000 to any phase. 18 7/15/2025 ° 19 all 10 7/15/2025 Needs Met by Phase 1 Only Estimated Cost $7,527, 000 © © ® • Burn Facility © 0 © • Parking Lot ❑F ©®• Carpentry Bay with Air Compressor ©p © • Restrooms ©• Secure Yard with Gated Entry ©� 0 • Clean Classroom [ 0 © • Security Monitoring System ©©©• Confined Space Practice Area ❑F © . Shipping & Receiving Bay ©U © • Dirty Classroom Training Ground 0 0 ®• Employee Break Area ©©®• Training Gym ❑F 0 ®• Fuel Pump Station ©®• Training Tower ©� ©• Locker Room ©®• Manicured Field F❑ io ®• Metalworking/Welding B © 13 © • Office Space 21 • Vehicle Service Bay with Lift 21 i 1 © • Workstations Proposed Phase 1 Option A Additional Scaling Back Options (Phase 1 Option A) Reduce PW Maintenance Shop Space to 3 bays (40'x60') 22 2 tN LI "Cod Own T—CNt M 32oNoo .7 S 6163 a0 Cr 5 116 7000 S W 120 1-00..2 SF S 31135 a1N 120o89300 1-Ob 2M SF S 21136 6116 Wt9300 6 Fn SF 20160 2400 S 6M. N Y 5 207N NN 01072000 $ WON Tog S- T.SM 3W SF 3 6951 0 6 PATk.0 S1b w75101t ffl t r sw. SF S 61 7 T S-EtebNO-CaK S1r SF a 9713 0 0 SN 01•N 360Y� V S 14500 720 S 10440090 9 00.b.. S— U- LF S 11191 0 S N 1010 11 So ~- SO ri P. LF S 124 441 70 1 24U?L 12 �S.wa Unn 50S 21231 2700 S 57 VI GO 1 LF 6361 600 5017656 I .Mi00 Pa aAaawate LS 2500000 1 S riWW N EA 2a2000 1 242000 S EA S N % sft�-C— EA S IIn" 1 IINN 17 SYr .Cl�lJuO 0 if S 922S IN S 1M63250 16 90eF 06n6 LF a 13993 370 S S177a to IN Pawwp..fww 6aN aN Su.OaN SF 1030 1 "So,I 19p $Wct AB--sw— $F 738 0 _' CLwrw1. FN 6-A MatbroaNd $—T— SF S 1652 NOW S 10521719 �fra�a FN SE 3 131 1N0 3 X121SI :J "latlx -T L -i01N aN F LF S 7660 291o7 6N I 31 7 Sf S 36 33 0 `5 011ft,Tat EA tS 1a 1500900 26 SYed EA S 569000 6 S 4SS&00 D S.wt E. 5.IQ Is 1 3 514215 26 Swp EA S 7542 1 S 7U2N I 51a� LSa0i6110 ♦ S 729324 3 S 2194971 9. 6 T EA S 167700 3 S 1163100 C.tA 3 W 00 7 109JA N TOW C..Wwb-. $611KAZIN Mdoofto C a BdaY 00.WWA 001tl1FFtal St AON 6% S awA2 io T;aOpO.n Nd1�%501�00F0 5% 3 256 U266 b^' T— $ 500 000 00 Taal Maas 1 Cwb: $6.595.307M 11 7/15/2025 Complete Phase 1 Ito Phase 1 Option A Top of Burn Building Option 1a 23 Needs Met by Phase 1 (Option A) Estimated Cost $6, 595, 000 Difference of$932,000 from Phase f Only 0 © ® • Burn Facility 0 0 ©• Parking Lot ©� ©• Restrooms ©� ©• Secure Yard with Gated Entry 0 © • Clean Classroom ❑F 0 ©• Security Monitoring System 0 0 ®• Employee Break Area ❑F 0 ® • Fuel Pump Station 0 [2 U] • Locker Room ©©®• Training Gym ©n • Training: Tower ©0 ©• Office Space [F] 0 © • Workstations "Difference is in the shop size. Would use shop space as storage area. 24 12 7/15/2025 T. 1p,, 71- y AR" Vt g_- 7�Z Proposed Phase* 25 Proposed Phase 2 Ph... ft— UMt kMAc-!— IMUC., S 2 038. 1 1 S J.�;UG f C, S 7 16 low S 71 c w SF S 31135 0 S 7:zS uwh� SF S 211 E 0 S 4 8,, 2 1. S 207, eO 0 5 S 207 W 0 J_ S 0031 0 S 6 4 S $713 WOO I M.3006M 7 S 33 0 1 a IF S mw 0 --t—. —K. IF i S 111.91 0 1 S 10 W-1- sewtAMel LF E 16. M163 1 % S 10192 im S it Sn. wa- - 2 if S m" 20 1 2114&71 12 m. —SF— Q _ _ 21-Zl 20M 6 42.460. 13 IF ?mw S I & 7 2AS IS 3 2S.M.00 0 1 H ".MG. EA S 2.420600 0 S 1 FSte I S WFW 0 3 EA LLW.SD 0 3 1,S'10—% if S 92-25 0 9 18 If '$ 13093 0 W. AWattP-- l —0—&M9ft- 9 S 1030 0 SF S 739 SSW S Si S ISS2 0 21 "r;7a.N —pM 9 5 487. 0 S M SF S 6n 0 S 23 j!!!ZFMZ!r IF S 79W 0 1 24 j9 S 35 33 0 5 25 EA R 22.MW 27 EA S S.142 is 0 S EA S 7d5Q 00 1 SQ.00 S 728224 L* S 306�W 1 U$3.8n,00 &00 64 1. Im SMICI.— 1 3 S s M LOUVA7 S 90 3 WSS581 -l"Phn.tc— S WSW,. 26 13 13 7/15/2025 Needs Met byPhase 2Only Estimated Cost $1,278,000 © © ® • Burn Facility ❑F © ® • Carpentry Bay with Air Compressor ❑F 0 ® • Chemical Storage © 0 © • Clean Classroom © © © • Confined Space Practice Area ©0 ® • Covered Equipment Parking ©0 © • Dirty Classroom © 0 ® • Employee Break Area TI 0 ® • Fuel Pump Station © 0 © • Locker Room QF © ® • Manicured Field 0 0 © • Metalworking/Welding B © 0 © • Office Space 27 28 ©0 © • Parking Lot ©� © • Restrooms ©� © • Secure Yard with Gated Entry ❑F 0 © • Security Monitoring System 0 © • Shipping & Receiving Bay ©� © • Training Ground ©©® • Training Gym 0 ©® • Training Tower ❑F 0 © • Vehicle Service Bay with Lift QF 0 © • Wash Bay ❑F 0 0 • Workstations *Assuming Phase 1 Only 14 7/15/2025 Proposed Phase 3 a ner, LW IAMCost 01—n 7otalCrl 1 Snt Larthncrt.tno Ct�..l m CY S 7.16 I= S '.160.00 L 1. dOce2A SF f 31135 0 f b 8m;h�.:.r I.OIIke2M Wry— 5F S 211.35 0 S E.. _... rsye2 2ffjfi,ej 5F S 20700 0 f 0 r,Pe1- PIWC WorSa'• SF f 20780 0 S 5 I 3.t.-JO slo,w Shea A S 59.51 0 S 6 E.. r,MI Pull rhro Aor w, Wash Aauon 3N Cheku St SF 07 S 23 0 S 7 E !,t 5 � Eocloseo'CNT St Ym SuOke SF S 97.33 48W 146'.1Ei 0: 0 sWater LF ! 145.00 0 1 S 9 ±s Sewer MaM If S III 91 0 S 10 _n, S-151-1 IF S L0102 0 S 11 n. Aorm pain% If S I2444 20 S 2,4U7-, 12 tsAorm pam Bee SF $ 3123 0 f 13 — ', E;:-tM-al LF S 8363 200 S 16.72S 12 130 S �i:al- kI*m Pmeer AOanance 13 11.111.4 0 S 14 i.IGas EA f2420.00 0 S 15 r � S, rnr EA S 35000 0 S 16 At: txui:Ies C:mmemcatiosn EA f1.130.00 0 $ 17 Site Fe-9 -Chan Llns, 8- If S 2225 0 S 18 50e FeacM Wrpu hon.0' if S IN 93 0 S 19a Pdve41 P, Dar. Srbr SF S 50.70 0 S 190 kC 1UP— Mte Darr $tdbr SF $ 7.18 0 S 20 Lena., Pao - 6' wen A,.ft e9km hum T— SF f UM 0 S 21 G—IPao 5F f W 0 S 22 A S 633 0 $ 13 LanOxa'ien arlO Shrubs If S 79.60 0 S N Iktaimn,W,w.Ecc Blttss SF S 3833 0 S 25 Wne, CrsRm Ions EA urlir 0 S 26 1 EA IS N00 3 S 17.09a.00 27 1 EA 5S.102A5 0 S 28 Sanea $ewtr OAS Gseax Se imon & $7.W00 0 S 29 S'—Dram Ha , FA S7293.24 0 S 30 StC"Sane6Gre3WT,a FA 51077.00 0 $ 31 A;rm D—Cttchll-n FA 53,61600 1 0 S 7rMCMI—tim S 61LM47 MChfi -wit, Cml, El<ctn;al. Gectethm Metha KSL Avowal Ce p Ccnstivtu:rt %;IesvaW Sem:es rotNPhase l Costs-. S577d9165 29 Needs Met by Phase 3 Only Estimated Cost $578,000 © © ® • Burn Facility 0 0 © • Parking Lot ❑F © ® • Carpentry Bay with Air Compressor © 0 © • Restrooms FE 0 ® • Chemical Storage © 0 © • Secure Yard with Gated Entry © 0 © • Clean Classroom ❑F 0 © . Security Monitoring System 0 © © • Confined Space Practice Area ❑F 0 © • Shipping & Receiving Bay © 0 ® • Covered Equipment Parking ❑F 0 © • Storage Building 13 0 © • Dirty Classroom © 0 © • Training Ground © 0 ® • Employee Break Area © © ® • Training Gym ❑F 0 ® • Fuel Pump Station 0 © ® • Training Tower 13 0 © • Locker Room © ® • Manicured Field T1 0 © • Vehicle Service Bay with Lift F❑ ® • Metalworking/Welding Bay F❑0©•Wash Bay ©0 © • Office Space 0 0 IM • Workstations *Assuming Phase 1 Only 30 15 7/15/2025 31 Proposed Phase 4 71 o k < . f f 11 V• �T. �� IaW IllrllCml lotrt r:nt f _ f Kr< f 1.0.1f 00 li t 716 13000 ]a f 3II.35 0 f b r 1om as xo umrr.n<a X f nl n o t . s 2o].eo o s I. nar<wont X $ 2o].to o s 5 r 7Uanfo xw Rn0 X f M.fl J000 {]gA10.60 a xw vrWgn xslbn,rtca<mcr xc X 1 a)I) 0 S. Fnaarw' Rw W X 9])) 0 a xie NRSwfW.ler IF t 3.5.00 0 f 9 Sne N.rlks5cw<rR,n V 4 11191 0 f 10 frte N,lef-5<ver SrrNce IF 10102 0 11 Srte UUUre.RwmlJlarnR IF 2 IN.M IO ! 2.aSa.%S v m<uNnm,.Rama.m s<a X t n.n Iaao s .2.<aow u sn. urKr<.. el«lr�<r lF s MCI 20o t larn sI lb 9rte U1WlwseMClricN�gYa lo<.rr Ylw.ane< if f IS.OW 00 0 ! U Srl<lkMhw..NxaalGn G s I.a70.00 0 t u sn<unnr<,. Rrm< u s Js000 o f II xl<wur<..calm.mrcwmr„ tI. { tlb.00 o s v sa<r<K .clwnlw.e Ir wn o le sn<t<M• .wr a,.a It s IA.tJ o s ita t.wm<m.� v+tn 6afe ra fu0osle X s t0.]0 0 Ib tN tVrlace+iNOw,rE X >]a 1lStt 20 cwKmerw.r.mmMlMmcmnw low X usI o n .e> >soo t )f.sn.sf 22 furfak X f {.)S 0 tl ltrpfC .7tna.O51m,S IF f At0 0 N Waatco aa<t. X f ]fl) f0f t N,Sa),Il h WwRp f,r1 G i 15.000.00 0 f A ArtR G f S.Oi 00 I 11.]t600 )) Sew<IM,trW. G f S.1aI 15 0 n s.nn. s<.<roaacr<s to f ].sa]ao o s IB Ram a.urRw,a<. G f >.:S.2a 1 f >26J.N Jo Ramswaor<.,rlr G t ).anm 1 s S.enw Jl Ram prn Glcn!<vn Fa 1 ],aK 00 1 f 3.aK..O rarrc.�a.eus s »aus-sl K<na.n.rKCwxerarr<x c<wecwwHR«nanrcaxrr.<w.r w>,c to t sa,:c: - r,nvu.i.�t•.;r<fwa�vfenrcaa )•: f b.lh ' T 32 16 7/15/2025 Needs Met by Phase 4Only Estimated Cost $830, 000 ©©® is Burn Facility ©® • Carpentry Bay with Air Compressor T-1 Q ® • Chemical Storage © 0 © • Clean Classroom © ©© • Confined Space Practice Area ©• Covered Equipment Parking ©• Dirty Classroom o ® • Employee Break Area ❑F 0 ® • Fuel Pump Station © G © • Locker Room ❑F © ® • Manicured Field ❑F 0 ® • Metalworking/Welding Bay © ® • Natural Field © 0 © • Office Space ©p ©• Parking Lot 0 ©• Restrooms 0 ©• Secure Yard with Gated Entry [fl©• Security Monitoring System ❑F 0 © • Shipping & Receiving Bay 0 • Storage Building ©0 © • Training Ground ©© ® • Training Gym ©© ® • Training Tower ©© ® • Vehicle Extrication Pad ❑F ©• Vehicle Service Bay with Lift ©©®• Ventilation Prop Area ❑F 13 © • Wash Bay a a © • Workstations *Assuming Phase 1 Only 33 Class C Cost Estimate A Class C cost estimate is a preliminary or budget -level estimate used in project planning and early decision -making. It provides a rough order of magnitude of expected costs based on conceptual or schematic design information. Key Characteristics of a Class C Estimate: Accuracy Range: Typically, within ±15%to ±30% Purpose- Used for feasibility studies, budgeting, and evaluating project viability. Basis: Relies on preliminary drawings, broad assumptions, and historical data. Detailed quantities or specifications may not be available. Stage of Project: Developed during the conceptual or schematic design phase (approximately 10-30%project definition). Common Uses: Establishing initial project budgets Securing early funding or approvals Comparing alternative concepts or scopes 34 Cost Summary Phase 1 $7.527,000 Phase to $6,595,000 Phase2 S1.278.000 Phase 3(Per eodd..id $578,000 Phase 4 $830.000 Finish 2- 'Floor Office Acid $465.000 to any Phase1 Full Build -Out S11.255.000 17 7/15/2025 Timeline n Estimated 12-13 Months to Break Ground 35 Estimated Funding Sources Water Public Works Fire Park Impact Department Department Department Fees = _ $375,000 = $1,450,000 = $3,000,000 $196,000 Estimated Running Total: $5,021,000 36 7/15/2025 Council Direction Needed Approve the proposed Choose a project phase to Authorize staff to proceed design concept. initiate. with full engineering and construction documents. Recommended Motion: "I move that the City Council accept the proposed design concept for the City Shop Build project, select [Phase ] as the preferred scope for development, and direct staff to proceed with engineering, permitting, and preparation of construction documents." 37 38 19