Minutes - 2025 - City Council - 06/10/2025 - RegularEAGLE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES
June 10, 2025
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pike leads the Pledge of Allegiance.
2. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Pike calls the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
3. ROLL CALL: Present: GINDLESPERGER, MAY, RUSSELL, KVAMME.
A quorum is present.
4. ADDITIONS. DELETIONS OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE AGENDA: None.
5. PROCLAMATION:
A. Proclamation of Elder Abuse Awareness Month: A Proclamation for the City of Eagle
declaring June 2025 as Elder Abuse Awareness Month in the City of Eagle, Idaho. (BKP)
Mayor Pike reads the Proclamation of Elder Abuse Awareness Month and presents the
Proclamation to representatives of the Ada County Victim Service Center.
6. REPORTS:
A. Mayor and Council:
Gindlesperger states that the Family Tie Dye Day is this Thursday. The Eagle Arts Commission is
sponsoring a Christmas in July wreath competition.
Russell reports on Urban Renewal Agency District meeting. A strategic plan for fiscal 2025-2026
was adopted and the projects that were prioritized within the plan. A Special Board Meeting for
Valley Regional Transit was called to review a bidding protest.
Kvamme attended the Sewer District Meeting. They are currently operating within budget and are
in line with projections.
Mayor Pike states that a podcast was recorded with COMPASS to provide information on what the
agency does in the Valley and in Eagle specifically. This is the twelfth taxing district podcast. The
Open House for the Jackson House reuse study is tomorrow at the Community Hall. The public is
encouraged to attend and provide comments on the options.
B. Department Supervisor:
City Clerk, Tracy Osborn notes that 832 business license renewal reminders were sent out, along
with 82 alcohol license renewal notices. These will all be processed by the end of June by our one
and one-half personnel in the Clerk -Treasurer's Office.
C. Eagle Police Department:
Deputy Justin Elliot introduces Joe Wood the Community Service officer and reviews his law
enforcement experience. Deputy Elliot reviews local law enforcement activities in the City of
Eagle.
D. City Attorney: No report.
7. CONSENT AGENDA: ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ACTION
ITEMS. Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one motion. There
will be no separate discussion on these items unless the Mayor, a Councilmember, member of City
Page 1
KACOUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-10-25min.docx
Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items
removed from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined
by the City Council. Any item on the Consent Agenda which contains written Conditions of
Approval from the City of Eagle City Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission, or Design Review
Board shall be adopted as part of the City Council's Consent Agenda approval motion unless
specifically stated otherwise.
A. Claims Against the City.
B. Minutes of May 21, 2025. (TEO)
C. Minutes of May 27, 2025. (TEO)
D. Eagle Urban Renewal Agency - Seat 4 - Appointment Expiration Correction: Council
confirmed the appointment of Dale "Mac" McOmber on June 25, 2024, for a two year term. The
expiration date listed was erroneously identified as August of 2025. This action corrects the
expiration date of Mr. McComber's Seat 4 term to be August of 2026. (BKP)
E. Memorial Bench & Donation Request for the Cornforth Family: Request for Council
approval for a memorial bench to be located on the Eagle Greenbelt in dedication to Fred Cornforth.
(ELZ)
F. Live Performance Agreement Between the City of Eagle and Scott Sweet: A Live
Performance Agreement between the City of Eagle and Scott Sweet to perform during Harvest
Festival. Compensation shall be at a rate of $500.00 for specified event. (JDH)
G. Live Performance Agreement Between the City of Eagle and SpeakWrite LLC: A Live
Performance Agreement between the City of Eagle and SpeakWrite LLC to perform during Harvest
Festival. Compensation shall be at a rate of $700.00 for specified event. (JDH)
H. Independent Contract Agreement Between the City of Eagle and Carrie Walker: An
Independent Contract Agreement between the City of Eagle and Carrie Walker to provide
educational and recreational opportunities. Compensation shall be at a rate of 70% of total revenue
generated. (JDH)
I. Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with Eagle Urban Renewal for Cost Sharing for the
Jackson House Adaptive Reuse Study: Memorandum of Agreement for Cost Sharing between
the City of Eagle and the Eagle Urban Renewal Agency in the amount of $10,000.00 for the
completion of Phase 3A of Adaptive Reuse study contract with JUB Engineers. (NBS)
J. Valnova Community Infrastructure District No. 1 Water System Dedication: Eagle City
Council Approval and Acceptance of Valnova Community Infrastructure District No. 1 Water
System Dedication Agreement / Bill of Sale / Special Warranty Deed, Valnova Community
Infrastructure District No. 1 Booster Station Easement Agreement, and Valnova Community
Infrastructure District No. 1 Waterline Easement Agreement. (VV)
K. DR-2025-19 - One Townhome Building (3-units) within Valnova Subdivision No. 1, Lots
30-32, Block 4 - Hallmark Homes: Hallmark Homes, represented by Austin Wilkes, is requesting
design review approval for one townhome building (3-units). The 0.20-acre site is located on the
southeast corner of West Satinwood Lane and North Birch Run Lane at 5681, 5693, and 5701 West
Satinwood Lane within Valnova Subdivision No. 1 (Lots 30-32, Block 4). (BAW)
L. DR-2025-20 - One Townhome Building (3-units) within Valnova Subdivision No. 1, Lots
44-46, Block 1- Hallmark Homes: Hallmark Homes, represented by Austin Wilkes, is requesting
design review approval for one townhome building (3-units). The 0.20-acre site is located on the
northeast corner of West Rediva Drive and North Holly Springs Lane at 6276, 6294, and 6302
North Holly Springs Lane within Valnova Subdivision No. 1 (Lots 44-46, Block 1). (BAW)
M. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Approval of FPUD-2025-01/FP-2025-02
- Final Development Plan and Final Plat for Torrente Secco Subdivision No. 2 - Toll
Southwest, LLC: Toll Southwest, LLC, represented by Becky McKay with Engineering Solutions,
LLP, is requesting final development plan and final plat approval for Torrente Secco Subdivision
No. 2, a 64-lot (49-buildable, 15-common) residential planned unit development. The 19.83-acre
site is located at the northeast corner of North Palmer Lane and West Floating Feather Road at 6868
West Floating Feather Road. (KRD)
Page 2
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-10-25min.docx
N. FP-2025-08 - Final Plat for Tierpointe Subdivision No. 2 - Tall Timber Consulting: Dave
Yorgason with Tall Timber Consulting is requesting final plat approval for Tierpointe Subdivision
No. 2, a 91-lot (83-buildable, 8-common) residential development. The 23.28-acre site is located
on the north side of State Highway 44 approximately 0.5 miles west of the intersection of State
Highway 44 and North Linder Road. (ASG)
O. FP-2023-03 MOD1 — Final Plat Modification for Valnova Lot 19 Subdivision No. 1 —
Clyde Capital Group, LLC: Clyde Capital Group, LLC, represented by Landon Northey, is
requesting a modification of the final plat approval for Valnova Subdivision No. 1 in order to
modify twelve (12) single family residential lots. The Valnova Subdivision No. 1 is a 144-lot (136-
buildable, 8-common [3 private alley]) residential subdivision. The proposed modification to the
previously approved final plat consists of modifying the lot depths of twelve (12) residential lots.
The 32.41-acre site is generally located approximately 3/4-mile northeast of the intersection of State
Highway 16 and Equest Lane (approximately 1 mile north of Beacon Light Road and Linder Road
intersection). (DLM)
P. FP-2025-10 — Final Plat for Avimor Judge Subdivision — Avimor Development, LLC
Avimor Development LLC, represented by Brad Pfannmuller, is requesting final plat approval for
the Avimor Judge Subdivision (previusly Boise County No. 2), a 93-lot (81-buildable, 6-
commercial, and 2-common) residential subdivision. The 107.00-acre site is located in Boise
County on the west side of State Highway 55 at North McLeod Way, approximately 1.60-miles
north of the intersection of State Highway 55 and West Avimor Drive. (DLM)
Q. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Approval of PP-2024-08 - Preliminary
Plat for Valnova Estates Subdivision No. 2 - Clyde Capital Group: Clyde Capital Group,
represented by Kendall Hancey from Horrocks, is requesting preliminary plat approval for Valnova
Estates Subdivision No. 2, a re -subdivision of Lot 29, Block 1, Spring Valley Subdivision No. 1, a
154-lot (139-residential, 15-common) subdivision. The 121.44-acre site is generally located on the
north side of Aerie Way approximately 1/4-mile west of the intersection of Big Gulch Parkway and
the future Linder Road extension within PUMP No. 1 of the Valnova development. (HSD)
R. *The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS) Purchasing Cooperative - USA Membership:
TIPS -USA is a cooperative purchasing entity that would provide the City purchasing options that
are compliant with Idaho Code 67-2807. Staff is seeking Council approval of participation in the
free membership offered by TIPS -USA. (ELZ/TEO)
S. *Heritage Park Restroom Bid Award: Bid award for Heritage Park Restroom Project to
Bricon, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $565,900.00. Council budget funds with the adoption of
FY 2025- FY 2029 Capital Plan and is identified as PW CM-1. (ELZ/NBS)
Mayor Pike introduces the item.
Mayor requests a motion for approval for consent agenda items A through S.
So moved, by Russell. Seconded by Gindlesperger. GINDLESPERGER, AYE; MAY, AYE;
RUSSELL, AYE; KVAMME, AYE. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. ACTIONITEM: Review and Approval of Eagle Senior Center Logo with Review of Eagle
Branding Suite. (BLA/ST) This item was continued from the May 13, 2025 city council meeting.
Mayor Pike introduces the item.
Senior Center Recreation Coordinator, Sean Tamburrino and Communication/Marketing
Specialist, Laura Williams review the logo options.
Page 3
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-10-25min.docx
The consensus of the Council is option 2. Council compliment Tamburrino and Williams on their
efforts on the design.
May moves to approve logo 2, the colored version for the Senior Center. Seconded by Russell.
ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. RZDA-2025-02/CUP-2025-01/PPUD-2025-01/PP-2025-01 - Rezone with a Development
Agreement, Conditional Use Permit, Preliminary Plat, and Preliminary Planned Unit
Development for Whitehurst Village Subdivision - Evans Development LLC: Evans
Development LLC, represented by Becky McKay with Engineering Solutions, is requesting rezone
from A-R (Agricultural -Rural) to R-3-DA-P (Residential with a development agreement — PUD)
and R-1 (Residential), conditional use permit, preliminary development plan, and preliminary plat
approvals for Whitehurst Village Subdivision, a 16-lot (12-buildable [I -existing], 4-common)
residential subdivision. The 5.97-acre site is located approximately 830-feet east of the intersection
of North Park Lane and West Flint Drive, at 3660 West Flint Drive. (KRD)
Mayor Pike introduces the item and opens the public hearing.
Becky McKay with Engineering Solutions 1029 N. Rosario, Meridian, Idaho reviews the
application. The applicant is requesting some waivers as the site has been a challenge due to the
infill nature of the project.
City Planner, Katelyn Davison, reviews the staff report and items for special consideration.
Mayor Pike opens public testimony.
Mark Hamilton, 3660 W. Flint Drive Eagle, Idaho, is an adjacent property owner. Mr. Hamilton
has been working with Zach Evans during their development of their proposed development. It has
a very amiable processes and appreciates being able to work with the Developer to discuss matters
of concern. He is in support of the project. They would like to maintain their privacy; thus, a solid
fence is being requested.
Sky Hamilton, 3660 W. Flint Drive, Eagle, Idaho. She also is in support of the project. They have
worked hard to upgrade their property and greatly value their privacy. They love the Eagle
Community and have enjoyed the collaboration with the developer. The developer actually took
their input into consideration, and it was appreciated.
Mayor Pike closes public testimony.
Kvamme inquires if the proposed composite fencing has been reviewed with the homeowners in
the large lot. McKay confirms that they have discussed and reviewed the proposed composite
fencing. Discussion to confirm that the ACHD turning radius has been approved.
Kvamme believes the waiver requests are reasonable and likes that the lots. General discussion.
Gindlesperger moves to approve item 9A RZDA-2025-02/CUP-2025-01/PPUD-2025-01/PP-
2025-01- Rezone with a Development Agreement, Conditional Use Permit, Preliminary Plat,
and Preliminary Planned Unit Development for Whitehurst Village Subdivision - Evans
Development LLC with the standard conditions and the site specific conditions of approval
from Planning and Zoning. Seconded by May. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES.
Page 4
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-10-25min.docx
B. RZ-2008-12 MOD5 — Modification to Rezone with Development Agreement — Restored
Community Church: Restored Community Church, represented by Bill Stovall, is requesting a
modification to the rezone with development agreement associated with Restored Community
Church to strike the requirement for the temporary building to be removed and to add "portable
classroom" as a permitted use at the site. The 5.52-acre site is located approximately 1,055 feet east
of the intersection of North Park Lane and West Floating Feather Road at 3633 West Floating
Feather Road. (KRD)
Mayor Pike introduces the item and opens the public hearing.
Matt Moffett with Restored Church, 3633 Floating Feather Road, Eagle, Idaho, reviews the
application.
City Planner, Katelyn Davison, reviews the staff report and items for special consideration.
Mayor Pike opens public testimony.
No one chooses to speak.
Mayor Pike closes public testimony and the public hearing.
Kvamme would prefer that this not become permanent approval, a timeline that would give the
church a number of years to come up with a more permanent solution than a modular building.
Based on this concern he will not support the application.
Russell moves to approve item 913 RZ-2008-12 MOD5 — Modification to Rezone with
Development Agreement — Restored Community Church to amend the development
agreement 3.4 and 3.5 as presented by staff. Seconded by Gindlesperger. THREE AYE;
ONE NAY (KVAMME). MOTION CARRIES.
9. NEW BUSINESS:
A. ACTION ITEM: DR-2024-29 - 269 East Idaho Mixed Use Buildine - Michelle Webb:
Michelle Webb, represented by Julie Benintendi with BRS Architects, is requesting design review
approval for a 6,910-square foot, three-story, mixed use building (four residential units and two
office [business and professional]/retail) units). The 0.16-acre site is located on the south side of
East Idaho Street approximately 78-feet west of the intersection of East Idaho Street and North 2nd
Street at 269 East Idaho Street. (ERF)
Mayor Pike introduces the item.
City Planner, Emily Falco states that this item is being heard as new business due to a recommended
denial by the Design Review Board. Falco states that both she and the applicant are available to
provide presentations should Council so desire.
Planner Falco reviews the staff report, and the reasons cited by the Design Review Board's denial.
Mark Anderson with BRS Architects, 269 Idaho Street, representing Julie Benintendi. Mr.
Anderson reviews the application process and timeline. Reviews what he believes are
misunderstandings and errors made by the Design Review Board during their review of the
application. Mr. Anderson reviews the precedents set by previous approval of projects. Discussion.
Russell is in support of the denial. The information provided by the applicant did not change her
mind on the matter.
Page 5
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-10-25min.docx
Gindlesperger moves to deny item 10A DR-2024-29 - 269 East Idaho Mixed Use Building.
Seconded by Russell. Discussion. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES.
B. ACTIONITEM: DR-2024-30 - 269 East Idaho Street Mixed Use Buildine Master Sien Plan
- Michelle Webb: Michelle Webb, represented by Julie Benintendi with BRS Architects, is
requesting design review approval for a master sign plan for a mixed use building (four residential
units and two office [business and professional]/retail) units). The 0.16-acre site is located on the
south side of East Idaho Street approximately 78-feet west of the intersection of East Idaho Street
and North 2nd Street at 269 East Idaho Street. (ERF)
Mayor Pike introduces the item.
City Planner, Emily Falco states that with the denial of item 9A and it is associated with this Master
Sign Plan, the Council may wish to make a motion to deny this as well as it becomes somewhat a
moot point.
May moves to deny item 10B DR-2024-30 - 269 East Idaho Street Mixed Use Building Master
Sign Plan - Michelle Webb. Seconded by Kvamme. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES.
C. ACTION ITEM: FP-2024-06-EXT1 - Final Plat Extension of Time for Stillwater
Subdivision No. 2: Stillwater Development Partners, represented by KM Engineering, LLP, is
requesting a six (6) month extension of time for the final plat for Stillwater Subdivision No. 2, a
10-lot (8-buildable, 2-common) commercial subdivision. The 5.49-acre site is located on the
southwest corner of South Urban Gate Avenue and State Highway 44. (ASG)
Mayor Pike introduces the item.
Kory Elithorp, with Stillwater Development, 116 Carbon Ribet, Mr. Elithorp is requesting a 6-
month extension for the final plat. Mr. Elithorp reviews the status of the project and tenants lined
up for the project.
Discussion regarding the mounds of dirt, the connex units and the requested sidewalk to be bonded
for and installed at a later date. Discussion of timeline.
Kvamme would be willing for a five -month extension, with a condition that that cargo containers
be relocated within 30 days, the sidewalk could be bonded for. May concurs.
Kvamme moves to approve new business item C FP-2024-06-EXT1 - Final Plat Extension of
Time for Stillwater Subdivision No. 2 with the following conditions that the cargo containers
be either disposed of or relocated within the first 30 days of the extension. The extension shall
be for five months, not six months, and that we waive requirement to have the sidewalk
completed until the 2"d commercial building due to construction concerns. Seconded by
Russell. Discussion. Kvamme amends to require a surety amount for the difference between
the asphalt pathway and the concert pathway. Second concurs. ALL AYE..MOTION
CARRIES.
D. ACTION ITEM. DR-2025-10 - Office (Business and Professional) and Personal
Improvement Buildine within Stillwater Subdivision - CrossFit E3: CrossFit E3, represented
by Jeff Hatch with Hatch Design Architecture, is requesting design review approval for a 10,916-
square foot, two story, office (business and professional) and personal improvement building. The
.95-acre site is located on the north side of West Copper Silo Street approximately 150-feet west
Page 6
KACOUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-10-25nnin.docx
of South Urban Gate Avenue at 2320 West Copper Silo Street (Lot 2, Block 6, Stillwater
Subdivision No. 1). (ERF)
Mayor Pike introduces the item.
Zoning Administrator Vaughan briefly reviews the item.
Gindlesberger moves to approve DR-2025-10 - Office (Business and Professional) and
Personal Improvement Building within Stillwater Subdivision - CrossFit E3. Seconded by
Russell. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES.
E. ACTION ITEM. Crowfoot Ranze Inc. Presentation. (BKP)
Mayor Pike introduces the item.
Bill Godfrey President of Crowfoot Range. Mr. Godfrey provides an overview of the Crowfoot
Range, from its inception to current status. Crowfoot is a 501(c)(3) which has support from multiple
law enforcement agencies. Provides an overview of the Crowfoot Board and Management, all of
whom have multiple decades of law enforcement, military or management experience. Reviews the
legal challenges which they have faced and overcome. Discusses the next steps forward and
presents a proposal to the City to partner with the range that would allow all Eagle residents a $50
reduction annual range membership dues, the same as offered to Avimor membership dues.
Discussion amongst Council and representatives from Crowfoot Range. Russell expresses her
concern regarding roadway safety when accessing the range location off of Pearl. Gindlesperger
seeks clarification regarding range management. Crowfoot Range is a 501(c)(3), discussion
regarding funding and current secured donations for range construction. May thanks them for the
presentation. The proposal appeals to her as the liability would not lie with the City, and the range
would also meet a need of those in the Eagle Community that desire a shooting range. Kvamme
feels it is much better to have private sector operate something rather than government. Government
should be involved in something that is too costly or too risky for the private sector. This would
alleviate the responsibility of running, operating and monitoring the range from the City. It is a
timely proposal due to the challenges the City is currently facing at the site the City had been
pursuing a shooting range. He believes the timing is correct. Russell has questions regarding other
instances the City has provided sponsorships for non -profits, she is also concerned with the safety
of the location. She believes that public input sought prior to moving forward. Gindlesperger
believes that the request should be incorporated into the Capital Plan for weighing against other
projects so that the public could weigh in on the item. May doesn't feel that it is either/or from the
shooting park the City has been pursing or this proposal by Crowfoot but that this request could
meet an immediate need. Gindlesperger finds that an interesting perspective, however, would like
this to go into the Capital Plan and seek public input prior to the Council making a decision.
Mayor Pike discusses access locations for the Crowfoot Range site, as well as traffic safety matters.
Mayor Pike would like additional information as to previous sponsorships that the City may have
entered into and the legalities associated with the same. City Attorney Villages discusses the City's
ability to become a sponsorship or make monetary donation.
General discussion. Kvamme concurs with Council Member May that this provides an operational
shooting facility in a reasonable time, while not necessarily abandoning the City's proposed range.
The request from Crowfoot is not small, however compared to a city built, owned and operated
facility it is significantly smaller than those ongoing costs. Russell would still like to have
community outreach for this. Kvamme concurs that public outreach would be appropriate and
Page 7
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-10-25min.docx
would like to move forward with that soon. Gindlesperger would still like the amount placed in the
capital plan. Placement on a Council agenda is requested to be done in the near future.
Gindlesperger moves to approve action item 10 Crowfoot Range Inc. Presentation for a
public hearing on July 8' with a presentation by Nichoel Baird Spencer. Seconded by May.
Discussion. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 74-206 (1) An executive session at which members of the public
are excluded may be held, but only for the purposes and only in the manner set forth in this
section. The motion to go into executive session shall identify the specific subsections of this
section that authorize the executive session. There shall be a roll call vote on the motion and
the vote shall be recorded in the minutes. An executive session shall be authorized by a two-
thirds (2/3) vote of the governing body. An executive session may be held:
(f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications
of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but
imminently likely to be litigated. The mere presence of legal counsel at an executive session
does not satisfy this requirement
Gindlesperger moves pursuant to I.C. 74-206(1) that the City of Eagle convene an Executive
Session for the purpose of (f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to
discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or
controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. Seconded by
Russell. RUSSELL, AYE; MAY, AYE; KVAMME, AYE; GINDLESPERGER, AYE. ALL
AYE ... MOTION CARRIES.
Council enters executive session.
Discussion of pending/threatened litigation.
Council exits executive session.
A. ACTIONITEM.• Action Regardine Pending/Threatened Litigation. No motion
12. ADJOURNMENT:
May moves to adjourn. Seconded by Russell. ALL AYE ... MOTION CARRIES.
Hearing no further business, the Council meetiQg.wMQ4j9urned.
.•`��� OF E'4 C'�'••
Respec lly submi
�`�Gti�; •'•� ••••'•.;��'•,
OR g •
T.
O
TRACY E. O RN, CMC
? SEAL ,
CITY CLERkI,
•
APPROVED:
�'••,� �E�OF�I��.••`�
BRA IKE,
MAYOR
AN AUDIO RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD AT WWW.CITYOFEAGLE.ORG.
Page 8
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-10-25min.docx
RZDA-2025-02/CUP-2025-01/PPUD-2025-01/PP-2025-01-
Rezone with a Development Agreement, Conditional Use Permit,
Preliminary Plat, and Preliminary Planned Unit Development for
Whitehurst Village Subdivision - Evans Development LLC:
NAME
ADDRESS
HFN0]
NEUTRAL
lJrc'
flcvh ii lT�v�
�I�IOCJ LnJ �i .� 1
F NO
1 i-c)
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES E
YES NO
more on back
6/17/2025
1
Vicinity Map
1
'I
.4 -
P
e�
2
MULTI -TENANT MIXED USE OFFICE BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL)/RETAIL/RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
DR-2024-29
Eagle City Council Meeting
June 10, 2025
C _ , +• ;
r
R �'
1,
East
Fir,
MAA
r 4
ff: Emily R. Falco, Planner II
Phone: 208-939-0227
Mail: efalco@cityofeaRle.org
1
6/17/2025
Project Summary
• Michelle Webb, represented by Julie Benintendi with BRS Architects,
is requesting design review approval for a 6,910-square foot, three-
story, mixed use building (four residential units and two office
[business and professional]/retail) units).
• The 0.16-acre site is located on the south side of East Idaho Street
approximately 78-feet west of the intersection of East Idaho Street
and North 2nd Street at 269 East Idaho Street.
3
e owc srrE[r
Site Plan---
f
_ 1
%U;-
' I1FW Sff%NI a
4
2
6/17/2025
Landscape Plan
5
Floor Plans
J
4 'rK4 AMrtfPROCf IN
3mticonwwecar 2!w-
I
2 NE?ww-gsmENWG$Ec'OI
3 PAw"GGV10PYSE`*"
3
6/17/2025
Floor Plans
Li L
2 LEVEL K$""TW ' lE& 2 Rnawft
7
Building Elevations
I.Aidt
8
iurExua � caw.oum
Italianate and Romanesque
Styles of Architecture
L�
6/17/2025
Color Renderings
W-
Board Deliberation
March 13, 2025
• Not in favor of the design, materials, and colors of the proposed building
• Multiple architectural styles combined
• The revised building elevations included color changes to all four building elevations and facade
changes to the north building elevation. The facade changes were not harmonious with the
surrounding buildings and area.
• Expressed concerns that there were too many uses (commercial and residential units) for the site
and recommend the number of residential units be reduced to solve the noncompliance of code
requirements for the number of parking spaces required and landscape buffers.
• Expressed concerns regarding the site layout, programming of the site with conflict with pathways
and bike racks, reduced parking space length without adequate landscape buffers, and the lack of
changes made to the site and landscape plan in the revised plans.
• Expressed concerns that it was not within the purview of the Design Review Board to permit
suspensions to the Eagle City Code requirements that are not being met i.e. parking requirements,
landscape buffers, and parking islands.
10
5
6/17/2025
8-2A-5(B)
Section 17.3(G) states, "Design new buildings to punctuate the fabric of downtown with
Does not meet one of the nine architectural styles with four sided
8-2A-13
towers, grand entrances, and special roof forms that emphasize the character of the Old
architecture
Eagle Comprehensive Plan
Towne."
Chapter6
Section 17.3(Y)states,"Incorporate design elementsfrom landmark buildingssuch as the Eagle
The site does not provide the amount of parking required for the
Bank and Eagle Hotel, into the design redevelopment of the Olde Towne Area including:
commercial uses and residential units proposed
Separated horizontal articulation and element changes, system of proportions opens up
possibilities to new designs while maintaining cohesiveness, separated horizontal articulation
The site plan only shows nine (9) parking spaces (including two (2) on
and material changes, tripartite faSade (as shown in figure 6.25), and 20-foot high commercial
street parking spaces) where 11 are required
lower band."
Section 17.3(Z) states, "Encourage the use of terraced (stepped back) vertical mixed -use
The proposed design, materials, and colors of the building do not
buildings that allow for office, commercial, retail, and residential within a single building while
meet the objectives of the Old Towne Planning Area, the building does
reducing/avoiding a monolithic building wall along the street and sidewalk plane (as shown in
not use a terrace (stepped back) element, and does not include four -
figure 6.26)."
sided architecture
Section 17.3(AA) states, "Encourage the development of a sculpted skylinethat increases
building heights at the interior of blocks while stepping down building heights as they approach
the traditional single-family areas at the north and west of the area. (See Figure 6.27)."
Section 17.3(DD) states, "Ensure that new residential development adds to the appeal of Olde
Towne as a great place to live as well as to visit. Revise development regulations to specify
physical outcomes, including building types and disposition, block and street pattern, public
open space, architectural character and identify. (See Figure 6.28)."
8-2A-6(C)(3)(f)
40% (minimum) to 95%(maximum) Lot Coverage
29.4% proposed(40°h minimum required)
8-2A-7(K)(4)
Terminal island at the end of parking spaces planted with one tree and shrubs, ground cover, or
No terminal island at the north end of parking spaces
grass
Parking spaces shall be within 60-feet of an interior landscape island
8-2A-7(K)(3)(a)
5' wide perimeter landscape strip planted with one shade tree and five shrubs per 35-linear
3' wide perimeter landscape strip planted with Bowles Blue Periwinkle
feet
shrubs
8-4-4-2(F)
parking space length to be 19-feet or reduced to 17-feet if the parking spaces abut a landscape
Site plan shows 17-foot long parking spaces proposed abutting a
planter
landscape planter that is required to be 5-feet wide but is only 3-feet,
2-Inches wide. The overhang of the parked cars will conflict with the
required landscape plant material within the buffer area
8-4-5
11 spaces are required to be located on site
9 are proposed (including 2 on street parking spaces).
11
Design Review Board Recommendation
• On March 13, 2025, the Eagle Design Review Board voted 5 to 0
(Lindgren recused; Grubb absent) to recommend denial of this
application.
12
9
6/17/2025
End of Presentation
13
Building Design, Materials, and Colors
pill
14
7
y
r
7
6/17/2025
Lot Coverage
15
16
f. Lot coverage by the footprint of the structure shall be a minimum of forty percent (40%)
and a maximum of ninety five percent (95%) in which case off site parking shall be
provided for. The lot coverage requirement may be waived if development of the lot
as a parking lot is reviewed by the design review board and is approved by the council.
Furthermore, the minimum lot coverage requirement may be reduced by the council
for the purpose of providing adequate on site parking in accordance with the provisions
of this title for structures that include residential uses on floors other than the ground
floor.
Lot coverage of ground floor — 29.4%
Carport coverage — 6%
Required lot coverage 40-95%
Interior landscaped area
ECC 8-2A-7(K)(4), states that no parking space is permitted
to be more than 60-feet from an interior landscaped area
and an interior planter is required to be planted with one
tree and shrubs, ground cover, or grass.
6/17/2025
Landscape Buffer
ECC 8-2A-7(K)(3)(a), requires a 5-foot wide landscape strip
between the parking lot and property line and planted with a
minimum of one shade tree and five shrubs per 35-linear feet.
Proposed:
3-foot, 2-inch buffer area planted with Bowles Blue Periwinkle
17
Parking Space Length
Required length: 19-feet (may be shortened to 17-feet if the
parking spaces abut a landscape planter)
Proposed length: 17-feet (abut a planter that is required to be 5-
feet wide but is only 3-feet, 2-inches wide
18
6/17/2025
ARCHITECTS
269 Idaho St
Mixed Use
EXPLANATION OF
DESIGN REVIEW DENIAL
DR-2024-29
1
Original DR Application Submittal
• Original DR Application Submitted April 2024 as Prairie Style Design per Eagle Architectural
and Site Design (EASD)
• Held pre-app meeting with Emily in September 2024 to discuss parking calculation specifics
• Resubmitted December 2024 to satisfy parking requirements
• Revised from (4) 2-bedroom units, to (4) single bedroom units to reduce total parking required
2
1
6/17/2025
15161
3
7=
"-'
�- �'�E`4�• Ric
£�
TY
n'�
•�
`
Gam%
('
Revised Design Review
Revised
Design Review
Drawings
• Staff report received February 7, 2025, received (22) Site Specific Conditions of Approval
• Of these (22) comments, (1) did not apply, (1) requested a variance due to existing lot width,
and the remaining (20) were to be addressed to satisfy site specific conditions of approval.
4
2
6/17/2025
Revised Design Review
• DR board hearing was held February 13, 2025 at &OOpm
A portion of DR board comments included:
• the building "was not in line with the downtown historical design requirements"
• "this building is not necessarily improving the city"
• "this building isn't compatible with the downtown district, it might be ok farther out, but I'm not so sure it's a
good design for this area"
• "there are too many things crammed into this"
• "parking is an issue in that there's just not that much room for that many tenants on that small of a lot"
• "terminal island was required and is a hard stop"
• DR board motion resulted in a resubmission of DR drawings
5
P
Design Review
resubmission
3
6/17/2025
DR resubmission
• DR resubmission was March 3, 2025
• Architectural design was revised to comply with "downtown historical design requirements"
• Staff report received March 7, 2025, received (22) Site Specific Conditions of Approval
• Again, of these (22) site specific conditions of approval, (1) did not apply, (1) requested a variance
due to existing lot width, and the remaining (20) were addressed to satisfy the comments.
• DR hearing was held March 13, 2025 at 6:00pm
• DR board motion resulted in a denial
• Significant errors were made by DR board
7
DR Board -
Errors Made
• Misunderstanding of
the DR drawings
;:-
• Non -Applicable code
requirements
Precedent set by
other approved
projects
M
0
6/17/2025
Misunderstanding of the Set of Plans
i 0 PMVPEi
-
"The building height is 136 feet high,
that seems pretty extreme" - board
member Kelly Murphy
g
Allowable building height is 40 feet,
Actual building height is 36 feet (3
stories), not 136 feet (roughly 10
,•�
stories
• 100' is used as a starting datum at
finish floor as an industry standard
°
No other board member mentioned this
statement was incorrect
NORTH ELEVATION
I
Misunderstanding of the Set of Plans
• "Too many units for the space they have available" - board member Terry Sayer
• "Theres too many units here which is why we are banging our heads against the parking situation, that's
the point we are trying to prove, there are just too many units" - board member Kelly Murphy
• "It sounds like we are having the same site issues, basically it just doesn't fit and meet code" - board
member Jo Greer
• "Too much building for the site, because of all the exemptions" - board member Jim Mihan
10
9
6/17/2025
Misunderstanding of the Set of Plans
Eagle Code section 8-2A-6.C.3.f states: "Lot coverage by the footprint of the structure shall be a
minimum of forty percent (40%) and a maximum of ninety five percent (95%) in which case off site
parking shall be provided for. The lot coverage requirement may be waived if development of the lot as a
parking lot is reviewed by the design review board and is approved by the council. Furthermore, the
minimum lot coverage requirement may be reduced by the council for the purpose of rop viding adequate
on site parking in accordance with the provisions of this title for structures that include residential uses
on floors other than the ground floor."
Allowable building area is 40-95% of lot area, Actual building area is roughly 30% of lot area
Eagle Code section 8-2A-6.C.c clarifies that Downtown Development Area encourages residential units "on floors other than the
ground floor" and that "multiple apartment units may be permitted".
Eagle City Code Section 8-4-4-5 allows for Parking In Lieu Payments for the city to provide public off-street parking in the vicinity
of the use. We have acknowledged and requested (2) parking stall In Lieu Payments for our ground floor commercial uses.
11
Misunderstanding of the Set
of Plans
• Eagle code allows for lot coverage minimum
exception, as well as parking reduction via In -Lieu
payments.
• The claim that there are too many units is not
mentioned in the Eagle city code and this
statement is incorrect.
• We have shown that the building does fit within
the existing lot, complies with the residential
parking requirements, and can meet city code with
council approval of (2) parking stall In Lieu
Payments for ground floor commercial uses
12
u
WWSHEPM
10
6/17/2025
..-10 STREET
eta
• Nn __
r
Non -Applicable Code Requirements
I�
Staff report dated March 4, 2025, Site Specific
Conditions of Approval item #10: Provide a revised
landscape plan showing the addition of a terminal
island north the
of parking spaces located south of
the building. The terminal island shall be a minimum
=
of 5-feet wide and planted with one shade tree and
J
shrubs, ground cover, or grass. The revised
landscape
plan shall be reviewed and
p P approved by
staff and one member of the Design Review Board
prior to the issuance of a zoning certificate.
13
Non -Applicable Code Requirements
4 Parking Lot Intenor Larklscaping'
I
Calculated Arnoura. Interim parking let landscaping shall re,required on any Parking lot win
ten (1. spaces and above. The requred amount of landscaping Is based on a sliding sole, as follms
• Eagle Code section 8-2A-7.K.4 states:
TOW likkag ar of "bear
Percent Of Total Aree Of A Lot That Must Be An
Interior Landscaped Ana
10 - 20
5 percent
21 - 50
8 percent
51.
10 percent
b Additional Requirements'.
(1) No infer., planter shall be loss dial eve feet (5') in any dYnensan
(2) No parking space shall be more than sixty feet (80') from an interior landscaped area
(3) Parking Stands are to ben evenly spaced as feasible throughput the lot to consistently
educe the visual urip t of bug rows .1 parked cars.
(4) Decidr suede bees and ground covers or low shrubs are recommended as phirnery
plantings in interior 6rKJScaPed Drees Deciduous shade trees are to be clear branched to a height of six
feet (B')-
(5) A lemunal island or a si gie row of parking spaces shall be landscaped wM at West one
tree and shrubs, ground cover or grass. A terminal island for a double row of parking Spares shell
contain not less than two (2) bees and shrubs, ground cover, or grass.
14
Interior parking lot landscaping shall
be required on any parking lot with
ten (10) spaces and above.
• Site design includes (7) total parking
stalls, therefore Eagle Code section 8-
2A-7.K.4 does not apply
F
6/17/2025
Precedent Set by Other Approved Projects
• Staff report dated March 4, 2025, Site Specific Conditions of Approval item #11: Provide a
revised landscape plan showing the landscape buffer between the parking lot and east
prrooertYline a minimum of 5-feet wide and planted with one shade tree and five shrubs per
35-linear feet. The revised landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff and one
member of the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a zoning certificate.
15
— SCREENM FENCE
f L1
Precedent Set by Other
C,SMS,RUCfURE
Approved Projects
We requested a variance to the 5-foot wide
landscape buffer as we are limited by the
_ T(-P
existing lot width and can only provide buffer of
3,-2"
oaNE AME �p b
0VftK OF COVERED
\; a
"Request for waiver for width on west...
fundamentally, too much building for the site...
WWACT �z m
i historically haven't allowed for that" - board
member Jim Mihan
L.___..____-__
CCAFACT LJ b
—t
TI'•R
ExgTINGCVERHEADP�ES
- -
16
RM
6/17/2025
M f
17
18
Precedent Set by Other
Approved Projects
• "Request for waiver for width on west...
fundamentally, too much building for the site...
historically haven't allowed for that" - board
member Jim Mihan
• Example location: 135 N 2nd St Eagle (directly to
the East), South elevation
• Previously approved with landscape buffer
abutting 269 Idaho East property line
Precedent Set by Other
Approved Projects
Measurement taken showing buffer width of
3-10", not 5' wide as required by Eagle code.
6/17/2025
_ r
BOU.AMS. TYP.
ALI1 � I RYIMi i
LINE OF STRUCTURE b
ABOVE
0 bl
DR PA AISLE
� ❑ a I
OUTLINE OF COVERED
PARKING ROOF \\
70MWT 2� e
k COMPACT 1❑ -
__ _
E%STMG OVERHEAD POWERLINES 7RGOERW
19
Precedent Set by Other
Approved Projects
• We can and would be more than willing to
provide a portion of the requirement or even
split the difference between our combined 8'-
2" of total landscape buffer width with (2)
buffers of 4'-1".
Precedent Set by Other Approved Projects
• "Terminal island inside parking lot is a majority of our past decisions is required, and has been
a requirement, and so there is going to be a conflict there to providing a tree in that space
which is going to reduce parking" - board member Jim Mihan
• As mentioned in previous slide, terminal island would be required if provided (10) or more parking
stalls.
20
10
6/17/2025
Precedent Set by Other
Approved Projects
• Example location: 135 N 2"d St Eagle (directly to
the East), North elevation
• Previously approved with terminal island
abutting North elevation
21
■• �i �1
O9■! ■
. �i;�rq�1611 Illlll';
PreSetcedent by Other
Approved Projects
Measurement taken showing buffer width of 3-0",
}' 3
not 5' wide as required by Eagle code.
.•�����II'�' ".�'i t ray ,'� �
22
11
6/17/2025
23
Precedent Set by Other
Approved Projects
• Example location: 132 E State St
Eagle (directly southwest on same
block), DR-08-22 dated April 19,
2022
• Previously approved with multiple
missing terminal islands
24
- Auty
�c
FXIST ING
BUILDINGi
O 1
J
PROPOSED
_
_ BUILDING
FF=2555.0
I
EXISTING
-.•.%�..
fit III DING
.
[ XIST ING
�
BUILDING
i fl
E STATE ST
12
6/17/2025
Precedent Set by Other
Approved Projects
• We can and would be more than willing to
provide a portion of terminal island on North
side while splitting the difference with the
landscape buffer to the South, giving 2' buffer to
each end of parking. We could also provide
fence to provide screening of parking at East
and South property tines.
25
BOLLARDS. NP.
/! /
— SCREENING FENCE
i
ADA STRIPING
LINE OF STRUCTURE
ABOVE
—/
b
------------ -
--
b
�I
2R-p
DRIVE AISLE ...._ .....a
b
�I
anuE OF COVERED
PARKING ROOF \ .
!COMPACT b
ss
I
i
l
COMPACT ❑i a;
_
t f
z,•.v
Precedent Set by Other Approved Projects
• "Regarding architectural style... I just see a few areas that I don't particularly understand like the concrete
overhangs, a white roof with dark brown colors", and "The large amounts of stucco on the east side, just flat
stucco, no interest at all, and even the west side is just not a good looking building in my opinion. Regardless of
the styling you add on to it, it's just putting boxes on top of one another to cram in as much people as you can,
you lose any of the artistic beauty and architectural beauty of the area" - board member Kelly Murphy
• "I like the front of the building better than what it was before, but the rest of it seems pretty plain to me" - board
member Terry Sayer
• "The front of the building does seem to align with the downtown design, I think there are a couple items that
could be re -worked in that sense" - board member Jo Greer
• "Architecturally it's more confusing than the prior submittal, if we didn't have this much massing and size and
overhang, we might have something to work with" - board member Jim Mihan
26
13
6/17/2025
EXAMPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN IN THE -OLDE TOWNE" PLANNING AREA
Mao 6.21i) w=rtown Subarea.
+ 1
27
28
Precedent Set by Other
Approved Projects
• Photos were taken of (7) different
examples within the ==Olde Towne"
Planning Area.
14
.y
Ogg- ��
fir•
a
DKW
94
6/17/2025
33
Precedent Set by Other Approved Projects
ito omit,
a
34
Aikens St &
15S St
17
6/17/2025
35
36
6/17/2025
3/
Precedent Set by Other Approved Projects
V
{
38
i � 1
State St &
Eagle Rd
WE
6/17/2025
Precedent Set by Other Approved Projects
T �! =-I - IT
39
State St &
Eagle Rd
Precedent Set by Other Approved Projects
M
40
State St &
Cobblestone
20
6/17/2025
Precedent Set by Other Approved Projects
It is very clear that although the intent and desire to provide the Olde Towne Planning area with
"design elements from landmark buildings such as the Eagle Bank and the Eagle Hotel", and
"Establish unique design criteria for the Olde Towne Area that complements the historic
character of the area", this is NOT the precedent nor consi t n y set by other aprp Qved
pEQjec_ts in the Olde Towne Planning Area.
• We strongly feel DR denial was not warranted given the examples discussed, and that 269
Idaho is being held to a different standard than other projects previously approved.
41
Design Review Denial Recap
Request #1: "Too many units", "Doesn't Fit"
• Resolution #1: City council approvat of (2) parking stall In Lieu Payments for ground floor cQmmercial use,
Request #2: Landscape buffer between the parking lot and east property line a minimum of 5-feet
• Resolution #2: City council approval of 3'-2" buffer with fence to scceen parking. Alternative, city council approval of
both East and Werit buffers of 4'-1 ".
Request #3: Provide terminal island north of the parking spaces located south of the building
• Resolution #3: City council approval with no terminal island. Alternative, city council approval of ' terminal lands
at each end of arking lot with fence aJQDg ally to screen parkno.
Request #4: Architectural style to be re -worked
• Resolution #4: City council to approve Arch lt ural style as submitted March rd 9095. Alternative, allow us to
include additional design elements and arch tt ural character that is ortr yed in the -Eagle Comprehensive Plan
42
21
ALL ROOF MOUNTED MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM
VIEW AT EYE LEVEL PER EAGLE CITY CODE
2 MECHANICAL SCREENING SECTION
EYE LEVEL
PREFABRICATED COVERED PARKING FASCIA
ATTACHED TO STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAME.
INSTALLED ON ALL SIDES
PREFABRICATED COVERED PARKING BDECK
OVER STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAME
PREFABRICATED COVERED PARKING
STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAME
3 PARKING CANOPY SECTION
EYE LEVEL
LIGHT FIXTURE TO BE SHIELDED TO DIRECT ALL
LIGHT DOWNWARD AND THE SOURCE OF LIGHT
NOT DIRECTLY VISIBLE PER EAGLE CRY CODE
SECTION 6-4.4--2
DOWNSPOUT LOCATION,
CONNECT UNDERGROUND
PLANTER
EXISTING W000 FENCE
EXISTIOO\
STRUCTURE
DOWNSPOUT LOCATION.
CONNECT UNDERGROUND
TRASH STORAGE AREA
EXISTING WOOD FENCE
EXISTING
STRUCTURE
NOTE'
SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAILS
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
NEW SITE PLAN
E IDAHO STREET
24'-01
b
NEW TREE GRATE
24'-0'
9
BOLLARDS, TYP
SCREENING FENCE
L ADASTRPING
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES
EXISTING POLE WITH ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
ALLEY
SCALE V"=V0-40
EXISTING TREE GRATE
DOWNSPOUT LOCATION,
CONNECT UNDERGROUND
DEWALK
STING VINYL FENCE
DOWNSPOUT LOCATION,
CONNECT UNDERGROUND
NORTH
NOTE. ARCHITECTURAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE REQUESTED BY CITY CODE OF EAGLE
IDAHO. PLEASE NOTE THAT FIREILIFE SAFETY REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION HAS NOT
YET BEEN PERFORMED AND THAT THIS WILL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO BUILDING
PERMIT SUBMISSION. NOTE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWING SHEET IN P&Z SUBMISSION
VICINITY MAP
•
369E Idaho St
NORTH
SITE 1 BUILDING DATA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DEMO OF AN EXISTNNG ]STORY MULTI -FAMILY STRUCTURE AND TREE TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 3-STORY BUILANO WITH COMMERCIAL TENANT SPACE ON THE GROUND
FLOOR AND (4) 1-BEDROOM APARTMENTS ON THE 350 AND 3170 FLOORS, SITE IMPROVEMENTS WITH A
PARKING LOT BEHIND THE BUILDING WITH ACCESS FROM THE ALLEY. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE
MITIGATION TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE REMOVAL OF A LARGE TREE
SITE ZONING
ZONE- C30- CENTRAL BUSINESS DSTRICT
DESIGN REVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICT' DOA • DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AREA
SITE AREA
0.160 ACRES
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL. R1296110065
ADDRESS'. 268 E IDAHO ST, EAGLE. ID 8361E
PARCEL DESCRIPTION. LOT 8 BLK 2 CARPENTERS ADD
0(W BUII DING AREA
1ST FLOOR COMMERCIAL 20545F
2ND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL 2840 SF
3RD FLOOR RESIDENTIAL 2216 SF
TOTAL 6,9105E
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
RESIDENTIAL
15 SPACES INCLUDING 1 COVERED PLUS 15 GUEST SPACES PER EACH 1-BEORDOOM. APARTMENT
4)1.5 *.25) = T SPACES REQUIRED. OF THOSE. 4 COVERED
COMMERCIAL
TYPES OF USES REQUIRE 1 PER 280 SG FT OR 1 PER 500 SO FT.
20541250 = 8 SPACES
5004 REDUCTION ALLOWED IN THE ODA OVERLAY
4 SPACES REOUREO OF THOSE, 1 WILL BE RESERVED FOR ADA
TOTAL REQUIRED =11 SPACES INCLUDING 1 A➢A SPACE
TOTAL PROVIDED =9 SPACES
(/) RESIDENTIAL SPACES INCLUDING (4) COVERED SPACES AND (1) GUEST SPACE
(2) COMMERCIAL SPACES INCLUDING (1) ADA SPACE
'REQUESTING A PARKING BUY-OUT FOR 12) AODRIONAL SPACES FORCOMMERCIAL PARKING
w
0
UJ
z
O
Fri
rr
O
z
-44 r2
fliMpt LW
Idaho Street
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOR:
Mixed Use Development
289 E IDAHO STREET
DRAWN
JAB
DATE
03(03,2025
CHECKED
MLA
JOB NUMBER
24033
SITE PLAN
DR1
DESIGN REVIEW
DOME TOP OFCMU WALL
WI GROUT FOR POSITIVE
DRAINAGE
CM WALL WITH THIN
BRICK VENEER ONSIDE
FACING OUT FROM
TRASH STORAGE AREA
ASPHALT PAVEMENT OR
ADJACENT FINISH GRADE
=1II=1I1= 111III=III=III
-11 1 1=111=111ITI-III=111
1=1 III=1 11-
SCREEN WALL DETAIL
5
?' ROCK MULCH
CM WALL WITH THIN
BRICK VENEER 61"
WEEP HOES, 8" 0 C
DRIP IRRAGATION LINE
FROM MAIN LANDSCAPE
IRRIGATOR
FLUID APPLIED WATER
RESISTANT BARRIER
12" TOP SOIL
-
2" DRAIN ROCK, WASHED -
ROUNDED, WRAPPED IN FABRIC
12' OF DRAIN ROCK BELOW
FILTER FABRIC
RAISED CONCRETE
FOUNDATION WALL
EIII=THIIII
EIII=III-III II- 1=111=111=1-1
=11=111-1
-III=111= -- . -
TI I -1 11=1 11=1T1=11
II—III—III-
1•
-1 T
I
111I
I-
A TYPICAL PLANTER BED DETAIL
=1.A.
Li
lil
•
112
3 COVERED PARKING ROOF
2 3116'
GUTTER T GUTTER
ROOF PLAN
n
ROOF
TPO
ROOF
MECHEy . TyP.
Cr
8' •6'
S•91/Tt
SCREEN
WALL
TRASH
STORAGE
TENANT 1
a
OL
TENANT2
UP
— SCREEN
WALL
0'
35'-0
v
1 MAIN LEVEL - RETAIL
3/16'= 1'CI
Tn
z
0
N
0
z
Idaho Street
Mixed Use Development
0
0
DRAWN
JAB
DATE
03/03/2025
CHECKED
MLA
JOB NUMBER
24033
COMMERCIAL
LEVEL FLOOR
PLAN & ROOF
PLAN
DR2
DESIGN REVIEW
36-5'
GUARDRAIL
STORAGE RiOOF ACCESS
BALCONY
OFFICE
1
\
I* BATH
L
q
II
BATH
o
BEDROOM
\
3
0
HALL
DN
HALL
ON
OFFICE
IBEDROOM
II�
b
\ BALCONY
GUARDRAIL
111111
v
4
,,e,-
OFFICE
I.
iIC=D
a
Do
II
BATH
OFFICE
l III
I
HALL
HALL
`
E
0
m
On
BEDROOM
D.
B
BATH
BEDROOM I.
35-0'
2 LEVEL 3 - RESIDENTIAL
rD
APARTMENT 4
TI
atr
0
Range
APARTMENT 3
rDW11
L _L
APARTMENT2
UP
-i
OA
0
0
0w
I
UP
APARTMENT 1
00
00
35 -0`
1 LEVEL 2 - RESIDENTIAL
3/15 = 1' 0"
APARTMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE
APARTMENT 1
LOWER FLOOR: 556 SQ FT
UPPER FLOOR: 555 SO FT
TOTAL 1111 SOFT
APARTMENT2
LOWER FLOOR: 672 SQ FT
UPPER FLOOR. 545 SQ FT
TOTAL 1217 SQ FT
APARTMENT3
LOWER FLOOR: 544 SO FT
UPPER FLOOR'. 494 SQ FT
TOTAL 1038 SQ FT
APARTMENT 4
LOWER FLOOR: 665 SO FT
LlPPERFLOOR: 590 SQ FT
TOTAL 1255 SQ FT
F-
0
O
Z
fko:all (.12
fah amek
LLaL
1.11:111
w
Idaho Street
Mixed Use Development
269 E IOAHO STREET
DRAWN
JAB
DATE
03/03/2025
CHECKED
MLA
JOB NUMBER
24033
APARTMENT
FLOOR PLANS
DR3
DESIGN REVIEW
TC. PARAPET
136'-0
44, LEVEL 3- RESIDENRAIL
rG-1
/t _L_EVft2-RESIOENTIOL
4041VEL 1 - RETAIL
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE 1/E"=1'0'
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE IA"= /.0"
T176-0 PARO, APET
LEVELS RE5E/ENTAIL
G-
iEVEL?-RESIDENTIAL_
I.
LEVELI-RETAIL
100-0'
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE 1/6"
EXISTING
VINYL FENCE
I52I 15-1
NORTH ELEVATION
TO. PARAPET
i35 -0"
LEVEL3- RESIDENTAIL' ,`
120-5
LEVEL 2-RESIDENTIA!T
EXISTING WOOD FENCE
LEVEL I-REfAIL I�
120' 0
SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"
m
102 I
F-1
EXISTING FENCE
BEYOND
M-1 10-1 I
FACE SIGN INSPIRATION
S. (SOTTO SCALE)
BLADE SIGN INSPIRATION
NI 5; (NOT TO SCALE)
6
BLADE SIGN ELEVATION
SCALE 112'=1'd'
_4 TENTANT
6'•61/.2"
FACE SIGN ELEVATION
SCALE 1C"-1'.0"
MATERIAL & COLOR BOARD
IMAGE
KEY
MATERIAL MFR.
COLOR/STYLE
0-1
BRICK VENEER
MCIJEAR. OR EQUAL
FOLSOM
C.1
CONCRETE
STO, CR EOM&
NATURAL
D.1
Worn OCOP.
TBD
Caw TO MATCH DARK
OAK
6?
METAL DOOR
TEO
COLOR TO MATCH SW6U6-
TRUSTY TAN
E-1
EIFS
5T0 OR EOUAL
Caw TO MATCH SNE7T89
GROUNDED
F•1
FASCIA TRIM
COLOR TO MATCHSKOCB
EXTRA 1M41ITE
G1
GUTTER
COLOP TO MATCH S
EXTRA WHITE
'06
LS.1
FIBER CEMENT
LAP SIDING
HARDIE CP. EOJAL
COLOR TO MATCH SA503;
TRUSTY TAN
M-1
METAL
Caw TO MATCH "BLACK
MAGIC'
R•1
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF
MBCICPEQUAL
WHITE (NOTE. ROOFI'„'G
SHALL HAVE CONCEALED
FASTENERS)
51
STUCCO
STO OR EQUAL
COLOR TO MATCH SW606-
TRUSTY TAN
5.2
STUCCO
STO CP. EQUAL
Caw TO MATCH 5W6069
GROUNDED
LICENSED
ARCHITECT
STATE OF LAO
0
co
Z
0
5
w
fLt.
fah mom%
w Q
DRAWN
JAB/NLS
DATE
03/032025
CHECKED
MLA
JOB NUMBER
24033
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
DR4
DESIGN REVIEW
0
w
00
0
z
0
w
cc
0
z
r m
Z 00
0 = n
oa:om
9
Soa
m�
faidltcdn.
Idaho Street
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOR:
Mixed Use Development
269 E IDAHO STREET
DRAWN
DATE
CHECKED
JOB NUMBER
NLS/JAB
03/03/2025
MLA
24033
COLOR RENDERS
DR5
DESIGN REVIEW
4
0
5
e'u
Ng
124 SF STUCC
1 NORTH ELEVATION - FINISHES
31W_0-0..
SOUTH ELEVATION - FINISHES
FRONT FACADE GLAZING PERCENTAGES
GROUND FLOOR
50% REQUIRED
PROVIDED. 222/401 = 55% GLAZING
2ND 8 3R0 FLOORS
3%REQUIRED
PT800DED. 2216139 A 26%GLAZING
LI It
639 SF SECOND & THIRD FLOOR ELEVATION AREA,
111
.111111011.
22, SF SECOND 5 TH RD FLOOR GLAZING
401 SF FIRST FLOOR ELEVATIOI/ AREA,
5 FRONT FACADE GLAZING AREA
3N5'=1'P
2 WEST ELEVATION - FINISHES
4 EAST ELEVATION - FINISHES
SITE AREA CALCULATIONS
OVERALL SITE
0.18 ACRES=68696 SO FT
BUILDING - 33%
2296 / 6970 = 329
LANDSCAPE -12%
617/6670=117
IMPERVIABLE SURFACES • 55%
3657 / 697D = 55 3%
6 AREA CALCS - SITE PLAN
= 20 0=
WALL FINISH CALCULATIONS
NORTH ELEVATION
FINISHES
AREA
WALL COVERAGE (%j
STUCCO
124 5F
6,,8%
EFIS
68 5E
53%
MASONRY
263 5F
208%
WINDOWS/DOORS
468 5F
37%
FASCIMRIM
1505F
11.8 %
LAP SIDING
1665F
13.1 %
7437/5GE
26 5F
2.1%
TOTAL
1,265 SF
MOT ELEVATION
FROM ES
AREA
WALL COVERAGEN
STLCC0
347 SF
146%
EFIS
102%
MASONRY
361 5E
154%
WINDOWS/DOORS
2115E
9.0 %
FASCIA/TRIM
2755F
11,7%
LAP SIDING
907 SF
38,81E
SGNAGE
05F
0%
TOTAL
2,340 SF
SOUTH ELEVATION
FINISHES
AREA
WALL COVERAGE (IN
STUCCO
235 SF
197%
EFTS
1435F
120 %
MASONRY
57 SF
46 %
WINDOWS/DOORS
96 SF
8.1 %
FASCVJTRIM
93 5F
7.6%
LAP SIDING
5675E
478%
SGNAGE
05F
0%
TOTAL
1,191
EAST ELEVATION
FlIASIIEB
AREA
WALL COVERAOE(%I
STUCCO
898 5F
396 %
E615
1465F
6 5 %
MASONRY
130%
WINDOWS/DOORS
228 SF
101%
FASCIA/TRIM
315 SF
139%
LAP SIDING
377 SF
157%
51GNAGE
0 SF
0%
TOTAL
2,385E
STATE OF DAM I
O
Z
a
6-
Idaho Street
0
Mixed Use Development
0
269 E IDAMO STREET
DRAWN
JAB
DATE
03103/2025
CHECKED
MLA
JOB NUMBER
24033
AREA
CALCULATIONS
DR6
DESIGN REVIEW
2
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
5
1
5
U
g.
to be cooled
PLANT SCHEDULE
SYMBOL
BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME
CONT
CAL
CITY
REMARKS
TREES
LRu/clamber styraciflua'Slender Silhouette' / Columnar Sweet Gum
B 8 B
3
10
35H X 5'W, CLASS I
8
Lirrodendron lullpitera "Fastigiate' /Tulip Tree
BBB
3'
4
50'H x 15'W, CLASS II
Malus x 'Spring Snow' / Spring Snow Crabapple
B&B
3
2
23H x 20'W
11111
Uri onrdeta'GreensPlre' / Greenspire Litlleleaf Linden
B 8 B
3'
1
35'H x 29W,
Class II
SYMBOL
BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME
CONT
FIELD2
CITY
REMARKS
SHRUBS
j j
Acer pelmalum' Dissectum Red Dragon' / Red Dragon Japanese Maple
10 gal
1
Ornamental. 5'H x 5'W
Cakmagro8tS x acutiflora'Karl Fcersler' / Feather Reed Grass
2gal
18
30'Hx 3'W
1
Euonymus ka d0o48ocus 'Manhattan./ Manhattan Euonymus
2 gal
6
801 x 5W
Halidolrichon sempenvirens Blue Oats / Blue Oat Grass
2 gal
3
30"H x 30W
Juniperus scopulorum 'Medora / Medoa Juniper
5 gal
6
10'h x 3'w
y-�
{ }
Juniperus scop8oran'Skyrocket'/ Skyrocket Jumper
5 gal
8
15'H x 3'W
t'fl4y�/+3`
Nesse. lenusxma 'Pony Tails' / Mexican Feelhergresa
2gal
13
THx 2'W
Pines sVebus'Blue Stag' I Blue Slag W5,I8 Pine
5 9a1
11
YHA 4'W
Vince minor 'Bowles Blue' I Bowles Blue Periwinkle
2 gal
60
6"H x 18'W
Yucca hiamemasa 'Golden Sword' /Adams Needle
3gal
3
3H it 4'W
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:
CODE REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE
MITIGATION: REMOVE 39" SILVER MAPLE (DECIDUOUS).
(10) 3' SLENDER SILHOUETTES, EXTRA TREES: 30"
(2) 3' TULIP TREES, EXTRA TREES, 6""
(2) 3" TULIP TREES, REQUIRED, 2'
(1) 3" LINDEN. REQUIRED, 1"
TOTAL MITIGATION: 39'
STREETSCAPE DESIGN.
"IDAHO STREET:
"SEE DETAIL / STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS
'TREES SPACED AT 35' O.C. TYP (ADJUST AS NEEDED)
'HISTORIC LIGHTS PLACED BETWEEN TREES
'FURNISHINGS AS PROVIDED
• STREET NAME LENGTH (LF)
• IDAHO 50
TREES REQUIRED
TREES PROVIDED
PARKING LOT:
•1 TREE AND 5 SHRUBS PER 35 LINEAL FEET OF PERIMETER
'1 TREE PER PARKING ISLAND/TERMINAL PLANTER
69 LF, 2 TREES 6 10 SHRUBS: PROVIDED, EXCEEDED
• PLANTERS
TREES REQUIRED
TREES PROVIDED
2
2
MINIMUM PLANT SIZES:
PLANT TYPE:
'EVERGREEN TREES:
'ORNAMENTAL TREES:
' SHADE TREES'.
'WOODY SHRUBS'.
MINIMUM SIZE
6'A" HT. MIN.
2' CALIPER MIN.
2' CALIPER MIN.
2 GAL. MIN
NORTH
0 10 20 30 feet
SCALE. 1" = 10'
4'X8' TREE GRATE, SEE DETAIL
EXISTING —
TREE 8
URBAN CONCRETE STREETSCAPE GRATE
DESIGN PER CITY OF EAGLE DESIGN
STANDARDS, MATCH ADJACENT
OPERTY
HISTORIC LIGHT
EXISTING 39' SILVER
MAPLE TO BE REMOVED
(2) BIKE RACKS HER
PARALLEL WITH WALK
RAISED PLANTER
SEE ARCH
TRASH RECEPTACLE
STORAGE AREA
CLASS I TREES
ONLY WITHIN 25'
OF OH LINES
BUFFER WIDTH NOT
SUFFICIENT FOR TREES
STACK ROCK
C�', I•t ®�D IP
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
8 MASTER PLANNING
(208) 345-0300
404 S8th SL N154
Boise, ID 83702
StackRockGroup.cam
W LLET C HOWARD, PLA
OFFICE: (208) 345.0500 EMAIL
ANLIAJACKSODADSOUPCNA
AA. VACASOCKGROLIA cam
THE GRAPHICS AND DESIGNS
ON THIS SHEET ARE
DELIVERABLES THAT REMAIN
AT ALL TIMES PROPERTY OF
STACK ROCK GROUP, INC
REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF
THIS PRODUCT CONTAINED
HERE IN 15 PROHIBITED
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN
CONSENT OF STACK ROCK
G R O U P. INC
02022 STACK
ROCK GROUP, INC.
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REVISIONS
MAK
DATE
De6crlpHnn
JOB NO:
21.223S
DATE:
Ilt.04]022
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
IT
DRAWING TITLE
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
L100
1
1
3
4
1
5
1-
6
7
1
8
T
9
1
10
1
2
■
3
4
1
5
I
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
•
Iu
■
LANDSCAPE NOTES:
•
8 -
om
1. REGULATIONS 8 STANDARDS
1.1 All contractor work shall be conducted m
accordance with ISPWC (Idaho Standard Public
Works Construction), 2020 (or most recent
published)', and City of Eagle, ID codes,
standards and state and local regulations.
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1. All utilities shall be located prior to construction
and protected. Any damage to structures, utilities
or concrete will be replaced et contractor's
expense
2.2. The site has many existing improvements such
as underground utilities, curb and gutter, fight
poles and sidewalks.
2.3. See Engineer's plans for information about
existing features
2.3 1 Refer to civil plans for all existing and/or
proposed drainage pipes 8 locations,
utilities Protect all drainage at all limes,
prated all utilities at all limes
3. GRADING 8 SITE PREPARATION
3 1. Prepare finish grades for planting by grubbing
and removing weeds, If necessary apply
Round -Up (or equivalent herbicide), using a
certified applicator. Remove rocks and other
materials over 7'.
3.2 All gravel overprep to be removed and disposed
of off site
3.3_ Finish grade to be smooth transition to allow for
entire site to be a natural lowing space.
3 4 Fine grade lawn areas to elevations set by
Engineer's plans with positive drainage away
from structures
3.5. Refer to Engineer's plans for grading information
8 for all drainage pipes and locations Protect
and retain drainage at all times
3.6. No pooling or standing water will be accepted
per industry standards.
4. SOILS
4 1. Lawn areas shall receive 12" min depth of
screened topsoil
4.2. All planter beds shall receive 1B" min depth of
screened topsoil.
4.3 Reuse of existing topsoil that has been
stockpiled on site is permitted it
4 3.1 Topsoil is tested and analyzed to ensure a
proper growing medium. Provide additional
amendments as determined by soli tests.
4 3.2 Topsoil is to be loose, friable sandy loam that is
clean and free of toxic materials, noxious
weeds, weed seeds, rocks, grass or other
Icreign materials
4.3.3 Topsoil shall have a ph of 6 5 to 8.0.
4.3 4 If en site topsoil does not meet these minimum
standards contractor is responsible for
providing approved imported topsoil or
improving onsite topsoil per the approval of
the project manager.
4.4. If Imported topsoil is used it must be from a local
source and be screened tree o/ any debris or
foreign matter. Topsoil must not contain racks,
sticks, lumps, or toxic matter and has a pH of
6 5-8.0.
4.5 Smooth, compact, and fine grade topsoil in lawn
areas to smooth and uniform grade .5" below
adjacent surfaces
4.6 Amend all new plantings with 2 parts topsoil, 1
part compost.
5. PLANTER BED MULCH
5.1 All planter beds to receive 3" depth of back & tan
mini rock mulch or approved equal, submit for
approval prior to placement Install over
commercial grade weed barrier fabric per
manufacturer recommendations
6. PLANTS
6.1. All plant material shall be installed per industry
standards.
6.2. All plant material shall meet or exceed the
yp
erOl21
minimum federal standards as regulated by ANSI
z60.1, American Standard for Nursery Stock.
Plants not meeting These standards for quality, or
plants determined to be unhealthy by Owner's
representative, will be rejected
6.3, All Ball and Burlap trees to be Installed per Balled
and Budapped planting detail All shrubs to be
installed per detail
6.4 Trees and shrubs over 3D" shall not be planted
within clear vision triangles.
6.5 Fertilize all trees and shrubs with'Agriform'
planting tablets Dr approved equal Apply per
manufacturers recommendations
7 IRRIGATION
7,1 Irrigation system shall be built to the following
specifications:
7,2. Adhere to city codes when connecting to city
water
7.3. All irrigation material to be new with
manufacturers' warranty fully intact
7.4 Install outdoor rated controller in specified
location on plan, Inc lock box with 2 keys
Coordinate with project manager and general
contractor on exact location.
7 4.1. Controller to have On/Off ram switch or ram shut
off device that does not alter program.
7.5. All remote control valves (Including master
control valve) to have flow control device
7.6 Irrigation system piping to be minimum class 200
PVC or approved equal, sleeves to be double the
size of Apes located within, all wires to be
contained in separate sleeves 1-1/2' dia min.
7.7. All pipe above 3" caliper to be gasketed, with
approved joint restraints at all 45, TEE, ELL, 22,
11.
7.8. Use common trenching wheie possible.
7.9. All PVC located under hardscapes to be
schedule 40 PVC with same req's as above.
7 10. All wires to be Paige wire 7350 or 7351 direct
bury wire at a minimum of 12' below finished
grade.
7 11. Connect mainline to point of connection in
approximate location shown on plan
7.12. Contractor is responsible complying with all
codes and paying all permits necessary
7.13 Sprinkler heads shall have matched precipitation
within each control circuit. Velocities shall not
exceed 5 feet per second
7 14 All drip irrigation to be buried 2" below finished
grade
7 15 Water schedule to be provided at a min o/ 80 %
evapotranspirason as determined by the local
ET.
7.16 Install all Irrigation per irrigation drawings utilize
material specified or approved equal
7,17 Contractor shall confirm the static water pressure
at least five days before construction begins and
to contact the landscape architect in writing if the
pressure is below 80 psi.
7.18. If any discrepancies are found, then local codes
shall prevail.
8 CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES
8.1. Estimated quantities are shown for general
reference only. Contractor shall be responsible
for all quantity estimates.
8.2 All plant material and workmanship shall be
guaranteed for a period of one year beginning at
the date of Acceptance by Owner. Replace all
dead or unhealthy pant material immediately
with same type and size at no cost to Owner
8.3. Landscape contractor to turn in as built drawings
at the end of project. Substantial completion will
not be granted until 2 copies @ 1"=20' scale are
turned in and approved by owner's
representative.
9. In the event of a discrepancy, notify the Landscape
Architect immediately.
NOTES.
1. DO NOT DAMAGE OR CUT LEADER
2. DO NOT DISTURB ROOT OR DAMAGE ROOT BALL WHEN INSTALLING TREE OR TREE STAKES.
3 TREE STAKING SHALL BE AT THE DISCRETION OF CONTRACTOR. HOWEVER ANY TREES DISTURBED
FROM PLUMB DURING THE PLANT WARRANTEE PERIOD WLL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE
4. WATER PLANTS THOROUGHLY IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTILLATION.
5. REMOVE ALL BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE, OR MATERIAL FROM THE TOP} OF THE ROOTBALL.
6 5' DIAMETER PLANTER BED/MULCH RING AROUND THE TRUNK OF THE TREE. 3" OF MULCH MIN. DO
NOT PLACE MULCH WITHIN 2" OF TRUNK OF TREE
TOP TWO STRUCTURAL
ROOTS: 43' BELOW TOP
OF ROOTBALL
LOWEST STRUCTURAL
ROOT 45" BELOW TOP OF
ROOT BALL
SOIL SAUCER>3" HIGH
REMOVE AT ENO OF
PROJECT
CUT AND FOLD WIRE
BASKET FROM TOP OF
ROOTBALL
cp
2Y,
BALL & BURLAP TREE PLANTING
GRAFT VISIBLE ABOVE SOIL
LINE
SOIL LINE OF THE TOP OF
THE ROOT BALL AFTER
REMOVING EXCESS SOIL.
2.3" OF MULCH
BACKFILL MIX SEE
NOTES AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
COMPACT SOIL UNDER
ROOTBALL TO 90% PROCTOR.
3/4" = 1',0"
3293-01
ADJACENT PROPERTY STREETSCAPE, MATCH TO THIS
TREE WELL SECTION
50. r!L mum!
Vit PEA
eV
yr MY muwa.
s crams
for
ql M MAY
1. • ter leeSelDOOA\POLEYORlO K.
r pVm tYetmac> *wars rD!!
13■19.00, •
sa• DerM a eves
CONCAVE KIALK
OlCe..ED Met
OCREY
nallyttOk
YE .80C arts
Ceel•Crea Y. %%rR
un4111•01•0 Sage
TREE GRATE INFORMATION:
4'66' CAST IRON GRATE, STYLE TO MATCH
ADJACENT PROPERTY, LARGER SIZE
NECESSARY FOR VIABLE TREE HEALTH
4 •
"Se tiiIwOH.ircn fE
LAY
lia• Ts, wad
NOTE:
REMOVE ALL TAGS, TWINE OR
OTHER NON BIODEGRADABLE
MATERIALS ATTACHED TO PLANT OR
ROOT MASS.
FOLD BURLAP FROM TOP
OF ROOT BALL DOWN
INTO GROUND; SET TOP
OF BALL FLUSH WITH
FINISH GRADE
17' TO 18" FOR
LARGER SHRUB
ROOT BALLS.
MAKE DEPTH MIN
4" DEEPER THAN
BALL)
SOIL SURFACE
ROUGHENED TO
BIND WITH NEW SOIL
BIKE RACK INFORMATION:
LOOP BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, STAINLESS STEEL
ANCHOR BOLTS INTO CONCRETE PER
MANUFACTURER
BACKFILL SHALL BE 100% TOPSOIL.
WATER SETTLE ALL PLANTINGS TO
ENSURE PLANT ROOTBALL
MAINTAINS j' HEIGHT ABOVE
EXISTING SOILS WHEN COMPLETE
MULCH 2' MIN.
AWAY FROM TRUNK
OF PLANT
3 DEEP MULCH MIN
LAWN OR PAVING
BALLAND BURLAP PLANT (IF
CONTAINER - GROWN PLANT
WTH ROOTS LOOSENED AND
PULLED OUT TO PREVENT
PLANT FROM BECOMING ROOT
BOUND)
NOTE.
'CURB & ADJACENT PAVEMENT PER CIVIL OR HARDSCAPE PLANS
•TREE & SHRUB TO BE INSTALLED PER RESPECTIVE DETAILS
•PLANTS 8 MULCH PER PLAN
MOUND PLANTER 3,5" ABOVE TOP
CUB
PROVE 1' MIN STEP SPACE
FOR ADJACENT PARKING
EACH SIDE. TYP
FINISHED GRADE 5'
BELOW TOP OF
CURB. TYP
FG
SHRUB PLANTING PLANTER ISLAND DETAIL
3i9333R1
TOP SOIL DEPTH AS
SPECIFIED
TOP SOIL DEPTH AS
SPECIFIED
CURB, 6' OR
OTHER PER
CIVIL, TYP
P-00-01
STACK ROCK
are®IllJlar
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
8 MASTER PLANNING
(20a) 345-0500
404 S ath SL8154
Boise,10 03702
StackReckGreu poem
WLLET C HOWARD, PLA
OFFICE: (208) 345.0500 EMAIL'.
w.nrETACKfttle•Yrielle see
'THE GRAPHICS AND DESIGNS
ON THIS SHEET ARE
DELIVERABLES THAT REMAIN
AT ALL TIMES PROPERTY OF
STACK ROCK GROUP, INC.
REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF
THIS PRODUCT CONTAINED
HERE IN IS PROHIBITED
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN
CONSENT OF STACK ROCK
G R O U P, INC
02022 STACK
ROCK GROUP, INC.
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
0
L
t0
rn
CO
w
REVISIONS
MRK
DATE
Descri,l,on
A
JOB NO
21-2235
DATE,
07.08 2p22
DRANK BY:
8
CHECKED BY.
Is
DRAWING TTIE
LANDSCAPE
DETAILS &
NOTES
SHEET NUMBER
L150
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
t
8
1
9
■
10
•
6/17/2025
MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR A MULTI -TENANT MIXED USE
OFFICE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL)/RETAIL/
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
D R-2024-30
Eagle City Council Meeting
June 10, 2025
City Staff: Emily R. Falco, Planner II
Phone: 208-939-0227
E-Mail: efalco@cityofeagle.org
1
Vicinity Map
._,.East I
46
PIN
• t
r f '•' _.'_ !; gel �� �1
It I
2
1
6/17/2025
Site Plan
3
Building Elevations
FACE SIGN INSPIRATION
BLADE MIA ELEVATION FACE SIGN ELEVATION
BLADE SIGN INSPIRATION
n
4
2
6/17/2025
6
Color Renderings
ffdl(1;
■I
.RAW_
ram,-
YSS®t!
Criteria
x \I bXix ln::Iln\. piSN:\A.vemamYln](li ur:x5:
I.p...6.x 4.wtl.a eVww+wr.era ..YM
I.fer. bee.v elan x.nwur
:: relrtl�
AI S:p6vam:.e. 61-'
easlrw'r iw r..prrrr
I tr aa. qo rraa rnm r+e.errw
r \II\r 1111\I rx ♦el Vl lel.11\I\:
r.�rr.l�rr.rb.. imrreio
land a d. ��rewawrc .GW h aq�eN b aer r rlre�e. rrvae. wF r
Ifyla� rl�n P Irclenaerrrr.q
I tsrYb�bw4�r 1pre.4 arrr.Ww Yb
��/rPrwYma tr Jr rrbwgerMebeq nr.wtr�eeb
rl P Ienree d W �a
r�r.ar. b.. re... a ree�eryrr rry W r prior
Y bY+raww r e wewdl orYr Y rrb rn. era. r e�rYl red
.rwrwrrbbuls
� ie� a b ayooeoYla rorE <orrr b eorpy rua b . nr d elpwr o�
. Carves wi le enoa o/rael r ory rmbrr a fo.ypo.N wp. a.a h
nmeaC r beedl Yr.eeNara r b n�sr r b ler
O. tN:w SAWLCS:
s . erNae wr W �.Ilu.
.. �1♦
a
NdRN ELEVATION ,
Master Sign Plan
Ib blew^sYfY Oersra u�:, , i imw 4oal l'+ax
nfwttiaer y4.etl L:r onn: "....,. .J perrleeelyeelW Ro: _. _: _,..uy
wy+� +aa ytr
Ib 1-lwew e..w bw fa trernW lwlwf rr Yslr, C d— W K*
- tnn. I ne,. r{. .ei. mar neweo.vaa4uewr
1 IK11 IIH I HIV tll 11 1
- t.a,rrr..e.�.ryb.sr�eo.r.
..-xyr.,ryrrl coy
nd 11 r1.
=,hr�oaaeloYcersa.;e.r�erer. r
CaferYnbi. 1pa6dIsa Yma
f.n m•�m . nm:: In< \nm+.am +x..a t:a rlwei w b apW r r.. a ear
. sic m.grnul.n�:Armr.d.Itl��M•+Igm.Yrr birernri�.
U; P .aim f iMr mrWle�s e1.em b a!r!d by r b
nl.hall.awn-1-111:,11-1dlyrK eleetlafenm—II= eeie
-r (nnM1 he;e.ltm
to .n..0,e.•I:aI:Ir Jnrprtd..aartalMrawlirrler:e.pva
' \nay.+4J..afw. hrtnl. 4rew,a wuly of tey llye a111h pemretl blaeweyl
o nu .:Pa.,mumn tmrw,na,t.eaaa�..r�...r.ltlavw,l,ae..e�.aaw.
(cram vWi h irywM ro WWI •e b myuamlert of Ibne mime
3
6/17/2025
Board Deliberation/Recommendation
February 13, 2025
• The Board continued this item to allow the applicant time to address their
concerns with the building design, materials, and colors which may affect the
signage.
March 13, 2025
• The Board recommended that the proposed building application be denied. The
master sign plan for the building should be denied based on the lack of approval
for the building.
• On March 13, 2025, the Eagle Design Review Board voted 5 to 0 (Lindgren
recused; Grubb absent) to recommend denial of this application.
End of Presentation
In
6/17/2025
Issues of Special Concern
• Master Sign Plan Criteria — SSC No. 1
• Sign panel thickness/mounting —SSC No. 2
• Perpendicular sign thickness/mounting — SSC No. 3
0
Issues of Special Concern
• Master Sign Plan Criteria — SSC No. 1
• Sign panel thickness/mounting —SSC No. 2
• Perpendicular sign thickness/mounting — SSC No. 3
10
Ly
6/17/2025
Issues of Special Concern
• Master Sign Plan Criteria — SSC No. 1
• Sign panel thickness/mounting— SSC No. 2
• Perpendicular sign thickness/mounting — SSC No. 3
11
SSC No. 2
2. Provide details on how thick the flat sign panel is and how it will be attached to the building. The details
shall be reviewed and approved by staff and one member of the Design Review Board prior to the
issuance of a sign permit.
BLADE SIGN ELEVATION FACE SIGN ELEVATION
12
J
6/17/2025
Issues of Special Concern
• Master Sign Plan Criteria — SSC No. 1
• Sign panel thickness/mounting— SSC No. 2
• Perpendicular sign thickness/mounting—SSC No. 3
13
SSC No. 3
3. Provide a detail showing how thick the wood sign is required to be -and a detail showing how the sign
is to be attached to the building. The details shall be reviewed and approved by staff and one member
of the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a sign pennit.
8,ADE SAA EIE,A[,OA
14
7
6/17/2025
Summary
• Master Sign Plan Criteria — SSC No. 1
• Sign panel thickness/mounting —SSC No. 2
• Perpendicular sign thickness/mounting — SSC No. 3
15
6/17/2025
RESTORED COMMUNITY CHURCH
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MODIFICATION
Eagle City Council
June 10, 2025
RZ-2008-12 MODS
6/17/2025
History
• On September 8, 2020, the City Council approved a development
agreement modification for Restored Community Church for the
addition of a modular building.
• On December 17, 2020, the City Council approved a design review
application for an 1,800-square foot modular building.
• On May 24, 2022, the City Council approved a development
agreement modification for Restored Community Church to increase
the maximum lot coverage to 15%.
• On July 26, 2022, the City Council approved a design review
application for a 26,818-square foot church building.
3
Project Summary
• The modular building was conditioned
to be a temporary structure
• Currently serves as the church's
preschool and young family ministry
• Requesting to retain the building as a
permanent structure
4
2
6/17/2025
City Council Action
Should the City Council approve the applicant's request, item #3.4 of
the development agreement would be amended to include "portable
classroom" as a permitted rather than conditionally permitted use, and
item #3.5 would be amended to strike the requirement to remove the
modular building, as shown on page 4 of the staff report.
City Council Action
3.4 Except for the limitations and allowances expressly set forth above and the other terms of this Agreement,
the Property can be developed and used consistent with the Agricultural - Residential District land uses
allowed by the Eagle City Code Section 8-2-3 "Official Schedule of District Regulations", existing at the time
a design review application or conditional use permit application (whichever the case may be) is made for
individual building use.
All uses shown as "P" permitted under the A-R zoning designation within Eagle City Code Section 8-2-3
"Official Schedule of District Regulations; shall be considered permitted uses and all uses shown as "C"
conditional uses under the A-R zoning designation shall require a conditional use permit.
The following use which is shown as "C" conditional use under the A-R zoning designation within Eagle
City Code Section 8-2-3 "Official Schedule of District Regulations; shall be a permitted use on the
Property. A separate application shall be submitted for a conditional use permit for a height exception.
• Church
• Daycare center (preschool)
• Portable classroom
3.5 The existing church facility may continue to be served by the potable well located on site until the time of
construction of a new church facility on the northern portion of the property. At this time the Owner shall
provide central water and sewer to the existing and newly constructed church facilities. A'*^: eenst wtie^
3
6/17/2025
End of Presentation
0
THE CITY OF
EAGLE
SENIOR CENTER
+e✓
3 / As p
51
1969
.r.
6/17/2025
LANDSCAPE & SIGNAGE IMAGES ft
Iwo NEXT LEVEL
DESIGN-S�DRAFTING
3
LANDSCAPE & SIGNAGE IMAGES
—M r'
NEXT D LEVEL `STILLWATCR
4
AMR
Asl 60A
M
STILLWATER COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE LANDSCAPING I—. i
STILLWATER COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE LANDSCAPING PAGE
2
6/17/2025
LANDSCAPE & SIGNAGE IMAGES
1,Zj NEXT REVEL STILLWATER
5
LANDSCAPE & SITE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
NEXT LEVEL
DESIGN+DRAFTING
6
,STILLWATCR 1'1'
STILLWATER COMMERCIAL I FRONTAGE LANDSCAPING I PA-
=1
a
i
STILLWATER COMMERCIAL I DESIGN CONCEPTS I PAGE c
3
6/17/2025
LANDSCAPE & SITE PLAN DESIGN CONCEPTS
RINZOW -pour
O � Y
��.a
°
SO O � fl
n o
oW mgy
JFX
flTEANDLANDSCAPEJ
a 4
0 o R
m z
m L
NEXT RED � LEVEL 5T LWATCR
7
8
P—T SGNEWLE ••••
I
=w,Lptt.!uimv'.�'.�-T- �n wgLN■Auec ucvc
STILLWATER COMMERCIAL C2 DESIGN CONCEPTS PAGE]
SITE PLAN — MATERIAL STORAGE
Short Term Dirt Pile
Waterfront Lot
New Location of Conex Boxes
STILLWATER COMMERCIAL I DESIGN CONCEPTS 1 —1 n
0
It
7 .�� Sl,i �;i� 1 �i��' � _�•�` a1c'='1��,
�_' 1 =i_•: .� � •} •r��� 1 � �_ ter_. •
4 At
r
\' T
r.
w
6/10/2025
Crowfoot Range, Inc.
2025 Business
Development Plan
Overview
Sponsorship Proposal
Presented to City of
Eagle, Idaho
2025 Crowfoot Range, Inc. - Proprietary and Confidential
1
C R O W F O O T
R A N G E
Crowfoot Mission
• Support youth programs to instill lifelong habits for safe firearm use.
• Offer a safe, well-equipped, accessible facility for community members to enjoy shooting
sports.
• Deliver education and training to promote safe firearm handling and skill development.
• Host competitive shooting events to foster skill and community engagement.
• Provide a premier, accessible training facility for regional law enforcement.
A" --
CROWFOOT �025 Crowfoot Range, Inc. - Proprietary and Confidential
-R A N . i -
2
I
1
6/10/2025
Crowfoot - From Concept to Buildout
• 2018: Avimor residents and management identified need for a formal shooting range in Avimor
• Avimor sand pit site is unsafe & only able to accommodate a few shooters at a time.
• A safer 41 acre location on Pearl Road with good terrain backstop & no nearby development was selected.
• 2019: Crowfoot Range, Inc. formed as a 501(c)(3) for community -wide and law enforcement use; land lease
agreement between Avimor and Crowfoot.
Land (41 acres) will be donated by Avimor after buildout.
Land + earth moving + road improvement donations by Avimor: - $2.63 million
• 2020-2021: Conducted sound tests, met with agencies (Fish & Game, Eagle Fire), filed for CUP permit.
• 2021: Horseshoe Bend residents opposed range at Boise County P&Z meeting; addl. sound test requested.
• 2022: CUP approved by Boise County; appeal by residents denied.
• 2023 - 2024: Judicial review upheld CUP; commenced grading and rock crushing - equipment vandalized,
delayed construction for remainder of the season.
Continued
A&V_
CROWFOOT (cD 2025 Crowfoot Range, Inc. - Proprietary and Confidential
-R A N C E
3
Crowfoot - From Concept to Buildout (con't.)
• 2024: Five-year lease extension signed; earthwork resumed, paused by weather
• 2025: Resumption of earth moving rock crushing to commence July, 2025.
• Phased construction buildout of range.
• Broad community out -reach for new membership and LEO participation.
Crowfoot is Moving Forward: Cost? - Time & Money!
• Time: SIX YEARS for formal planning approvals + continuous legal actions to achieve
approved construction -ready conditions and commence buildout.
• Cost: Crowfoot + Boise County total planning costs + legal fees > $100,000
• Crowfoot is debt -free, with - $40,000 bank balance from donors and membership
dues. Community involvement is all volunteer / uncompensated.
CROWFOOT 5 Crowfoot I Confidential
R A N G E 4
4
14
6/10/2025
Crowfoot Board & Management
• Bill Godfrey*- Director & President
• 40+ years managing people, projects & budgets
• Steven Gleason* - Director & Chief of Security & Safety
34-years City and Federal Law Enforcement Officer, 2-years DOJ Law Enforcement instructor, former Federal
firearms instructor, 12-years Ada County Sheriff's Office FTO Volunteer.
• Paul Lim - Director and Vice President
28 years Law Enforcement, retired ADA County Sheriff's Office, Law enforcement and civilian firearms instructor,
Master POST certificate
• Michael Wells- Director and Secretary
40+ years in high tech engineering mgmt.; 10+ years commercial and residential construction mgmt. - managing
Crowfoot IT requirements.
• Darren Howard - Director and Treasurer
25 years in project management - Oversees over $100M assets under management.
Denotes Founding Director
CROWFOOT O 2025 Crowfoot Range, Inc. - Proprietary and Confidential 5
A A N
5
Avimor Resident Membership Participation
• Multiple former military -certified RSO's (Range Safety Officers) & firearms instructors
• Multiple NRA-certified firearms instructors
• Multiple personnel with commercial & residential construction skills
• Social Media expert for membership & donor outreach & development
• Web Development experts for website & CRM integration for membership & donor
database management
• Membership teams being formed to manage & perform buildout duties
A&L
CROWFOOT 2025 Crowfoot Range
A 6
6
3
6/10/2025
Why Sponsorship with Eagle Makes Sense
The Major Hurdles Have Been Overcome
• Time - the heavy lifting P&Z permitting is done; enables Crowfoot to achieve full
operational status much sooner (2025) vs. slower phased -in approach
• Money - the organizational + legal costs have run their course.
• Crowfoot is debt -free, with - $40,000 in the bank from donors and membership dues.
• DOES NOT require City personnel resources during buildout, operations or
maintenance.
• Safe & conveniently located
• For all Eagle residents
• For Eagle Law Enforcement Training
• Longevity - location will not be under pressure from future development
• Unified fee structure for all Eagle residents (not just Avimor)
1"ki-
CROWFOOT rJ 2025 Crowfoot Range, Inc. - Proprietary and Confidential
n N G E
7
R
E
M:Y 751opr Road
• Red arrow show approx:
orientation of shooting lanes
• Note: > 300' increase terrain m
elevation beyond shooting 1
_ j.. n ale -
a
4
6/10/2025
Ground View of Site Before Grading
Vantage Point: Pearl Road looking southeast Vantage Point: Pearl Road looking southwest
AW-
CROWFOOT
R A N C E
10
(?* 2025 Crowfoot Range, Inc. - Proprietary and Confidential
Crowfoot Range, Inc. - Membership Fee Schedule
Eagle residents will have resident fee schedule
Effective April 15, 2025
upon acceptance of the sponsorship.
armor Baal�wt
_ Noa*, Wnt
Ct"vf—mn
M
Fu
General $175
sm
Family
5250
ON
Senor(65•I now"
1100
3150
Current
SmIWJ66'I-Fa Iy _
$200
5250
U.S. MMA vMrIM
$100
$150
L*4*M-IttaMAtr1�F
52.000
52.500
Membership
Fee
l�e,m� t— -_ so
So
nro actLa WorcemwrODoua $100
$150
lifelirne - U.S. Nrlrtary►l�Sa hart R�elprrf_ S0
SO
Schedule
.1. Arwr maneraltly •aa sr e>+M aartlwaary d tilt n.na.r�ry •rron, UowaadadaaYlr6
1+N9ma" iadi/tlY M qm as ft bNOMB.dm11
mamOaLlalfle.
rl>AporM loanr� man an No~ of M dq�0on ofM Bond for awr�plary
2 v
f—b
vakAW vWa�rr10♦ pWaaa b na Horror ar aparron of Goa/od Ibga TrN r rrrrYt ad•w ti
paepr� lof r � r M nOWy rnan� a adlw-
:3 'Fame/ sOM 10 one w moo nwOan of a rind 1rtiF 0 a ~dn d a uVo t—ohold a p.
wawa. ddd—n
9
5
6/10/2025
Pftft
m
}/ c
d
�/1 a
Vi
^, o
V
O a
//1 u
VJ c
m
C
A
O !r
�3
r
V / U
N
��
LA.3�
alV I11A.ewrwnuOuawnodNa ep«pa fq.aXaaarwur ur fit. K, andrvNcpw lne•ared�a •'pu wanM•PM bee mpr�'"•.,..
Ia Avenpr WneearprwnneeYepeabapW%.—Cendaen pepp.e WA.000vMw
I>t teeene apron mneeene b eararaeeer{ an Cnwlpet Cerroapeul dredoa roan 4tnota
11
Logand DeDo"Ert.
f Coa[
Grading antl Bem»:GtedatMpeltllr{lot and anootrnglenea Per the Conceptual Plan,rnnatrua aecuriry bemn Datwaarr Isom.and
-_-
•^a•
-na-
apply crushed rodttd at>9arp sties. Gratlrng[o begin approximately �a lune 1,20.lock uahm commence {to «ountlfpMr trt,
Ina in
�.
Proceaal
Pad PAW Yrproaesnrrta: Pace Pearl Read with asphalt homftMa Route SStotM Gam Counrydne, Inolutlrn{muttgla turnouts.
(n•
11
12
0
6/10/2025
Crowfoot / Eagle Sponsorship Summary
• Total of $246,000. Funds will cover costs identified in Slide 11
• Construction build -out schedule:
• Phase 1: for 2025 to support construction element nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 to accelerate range
development through end of the year.
• Phase 2: for spring 2026 to support remaining construction element nos. 7, 8 & 9.
• Eagle residents will have same fee schedule as Avimor residents (see slide 10).
• City LE to have priority access to range for training on reservation system.
• City to receive recognition as keystone sponsor on monument.
law
CROWFOOT 4) 2025 Crowfoot Range. Inc. - Proprietary and Confidential
-R 4 N C C 3
13
Conclusion
Crowfoot is the Viable Shooting Range Option
•
Permits in place
•
People in place
• Detailed construction planning underway
• Community outreach underway for new members and donors
•
Key donors have pledged services and materials
•
Earthmoving underway in July, 2025
•
Partial or fully operational in 2025
•
Demonstrated Community Demand
• Growing Avimor membership base with active involvement
• Law Enforcement supports Crowfoot Range development.
JAL
CROWFOOT
-R a N C
2025 Crowfoot Range a
14
7