Loading...
Minutes - 2023 - Planning & Zoning - 01/30/2023 - SpecialTHE CITY OF EAGLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING January 30, 2023 Minutes 1. CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order at 6:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: WRIGHT, GUERBER, MCLAUGHLIN, SMITH. Absent: MCCAULEY. A quorum is present. Discussion amongst the commission regarding receiving items for the record prior to the meeting. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ACTION ITEMS: None. ♦ Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless the Chairman, a Commissioner, member of City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the Rules of Order. ♦ Any item on the Consent Agenda that contains written recommendations from the City of Eagle shall be adopted as part of the Planning & Zoning Commission's Consent Agenda approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ALL PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ACTION ITEMS. A. A-06-22/RZ-06-22 & ZOA-01-22 — Annexation and Rezone with a Development Agreement and Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Establish Development Standards and Processes for the Avimor Planned Development Zoning District — Avimor Development Spring Valley Livestock, and First American Title as dual beneficiary trust: The applicant is requesting an annexation and rezone from RP (Rural Preservation — Ada County Designation), RR (Rural Residential — Ada County designation), Multiple Use Zone (Boise County designation), and Al (Prime Agriculture — Gem County designation) to A-P-D-DA (Avimor Planned Development with a Development Agreement) and a zoning ordinance amendment to establish development standards and processes for the Avimor Planned Development Zoning District. The 17,522 acre site is anticipated to include up to 8,761 dwelling units and approximately 860,000 square feet of commercial and retail uses. This application includes a development agreement, economic impact report, master wastewater study, a municipal water and pressurized irrigation system master plan, a master drainage report, grading and hillside development standards, and a habitat management plan. The 17,522 acre site is located on both the east and west side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada, Gem, and Boise Counties. (MNB) B. A-14-22/RZ-19-22 — Annexation and Rezone for Avimor Village One — Avimor Development: Avimor Development is requesting an annexation, rezone from PC (Planned Community — Ada County designation) to A-P-D (Avimor Planned Development) for Avimor Village One (portions of Avimor Subdivision No. 1, Avimor Subdivision Nos. 4-11, and Avimor Townhomes North Subdivision). The approximately 657-acre site is already developed with a mix of uses and is located on the east side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada County. (MNB) Public hearing remains open for items 5A and 5B. Ammon Harter, 765 West Colchester Drive. Harter neither supports nor opposes the application, Page 1 of 5 K:\P&Z\MINUTES\2023\PZ-01-30-23min v2.doc and expresses concerns related to members of City Council recusing themselves due to conflicts of interest. David Bundeson, called to testify. Mr. Bundeson was not present. Don Dotters called to testify. Mr. Dotters was not present. William Ziebell, 4365 West Springhouse Drive. Ziebell opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to outdated financial report information, claims they are not relevant to today's economy. Jay Combs, 409 Greenfoot Avenue. Combs opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to the public not wanting this being annexed. Concerns related to the development not having the capacity to serve its residents and a potential inappropriate relationship between the applicant's and City Council members. Combs responds to questions from the Commission. Robert Atkins, called to testify. Mr. Atkins was not present. Robert Imhoff, 816 South Waterton Avenue. Imhoff opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to an outdated master plan for the growth of the City. Concerns related to open space of the development not being truly open and usable by the public. Concerns that the developer mislabeling already planned improvements to the City as features proposed as part of the development. Schools not being in close enough proximity to the development. Imhoff responds to questions from the Commission. Dave Yorgason, 2300 Oakhampton Drive. Yorgason supports the application, and expresses concerns related to keeping developmental control of annexed properties. Failing to annex the development would yield developmental control of the foothills to surrounding municipalities. Yorgason responds to questions from the Commission and provides insight related to binding developments to certain standards with development agreements. Jan Males, 1379 North Prestwick Way. Males opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to to open space of the development not being truly open and usable by the public. Concerns that the developer may be mislabeling already planned improvements to the City as features proposed as part of the development. Concerns that schools are not within a close enough proximity to the development to be feasible. Concerns related to declining facilities of Avimor pertaining to trails and pathways. Males responds to questions from the Commission. Jeff Kimpson, 257 South Silverwood Way. Kimpson opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to a higher tax burden of current Eagle residents to support more public services within Avimor. Tyler Craig, 9306 Gilbert Road, Middleton, ID. Craig supports the application, and supports infrastructure improvement to the surrounding roadways. Supports that the area will be developed under Eagle City standards and pay into the Eagle tax base. Spencer Cofed, 8454 Brookhaven Place, Middleton, ID. Cofed supports the application, and supports infrastructure improvement to the surrounding roadways. Supports that the area will be developed under Eagle City standards and pay into the Eagle tax base. Linda Labacher. Labacher, 2764 South Lake Vista Lane. Labacher opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to a potential inappropriate relationship between the applicant(s) and the Eagle City Council. Concerns related to the City assimilating the infrastructure burden of the development, and the unavailability of water in the development. Page 2 of 5 K:\P&Z\MINUTES\2023\PZ-01-30-23min v2.doc Margaret Moses, 6070 West Peahoff Court. Peahoff opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to expresses concerns related to a potential inappropriate relationship between the applicant(s) and the Eagle City Council. Concerns related to the City assimilating the infrastructure burden of the development, and the unavailability of water in the development. Mike Birigor, called to testify. Mr. Brigor was not present. Meredith Hawkins, called to testify. Ms. Hawkins was not present. Jane Roling, 582 Palmetto Drive. Roling opposes the application, and proposes a City-wide survey regarding the citizen's feelings of the annexation. Tiffany Haun, called to testify. Ms. Haun was not present. Russ Buchert, 235 West Floating Feather Road. Buchert opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to the majority of Eagle citizens not wanting the annexation. Provides data form a survey conducted by SOS Eagle. Buchert responds to questions from the Commission. Jim Blockman, called to testify. Mr. Blockman was not present. Jane Kramer, 1600 Shoal Point Avenue, Middleton, ID. Kramer opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to the majority of Eagle citizens not wanting the annexation. Provides further data from a survey conducted by SOS Eagle. Diana Bush, 1674 North Parkforest Way. Bush opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to Eagle City assuming the tax burden for new infrastructure. Steve Meadows, called to testify. Mr. Meadows was not present. Lynn McKee, 1887 West Beacon Light Road. McKee opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to a City-wide advisory vote. Jim O'Donnell, 1660 East Stonybrook Court. O'Donnell opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to the development agreement pinning the City in an unfavorable position. Frankie Edgar, 797 Stierman Way. Edgar opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to there being no net benefit to the City at large and only providing benefit to the citizens of Avimor. Concerns that the existing Eagle infrastructure needs to be improved before annexing and assuming the infrastructural burden of a large swath of land. Matt Rineson, 759 East Lake Briar Lane. Rineson opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to the intensification of traffic on the Treasure Valley's roadway network. Lynn Lee Fortell, 390 East Lake Briar Lane. Fortell opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to no net benefit to the City at large and only providing benefit to the citizens and developers of Avimor. Fortell answers questions from the Commission. Ann Joslin, 1750 Washam Road. Joslin opposes the application and expresses concerns that the annexation does not meet the principles outlined in IC 50-222. Concerns related to the development not being economically viable in the long term for the City. Susan Wendt, called to testify. Ms. Wendt was not present. Matt Mahoney, 802 West Bannock Drive, Boise, ID. Mahoney supports the application, and expresses that there is developmental synergy between the City of Eagle and Avimor. Dylan Ludlow, 11249 West Gabrio Drive, Boise, ID. Ludlow supports the application, and expresses concerns related to maintaining positive control of the foothills and having Page 3 of 5 K:\PSZ\MINUTES\2023\PZ-01-30-23min v2.doc developmental control of the area. Dean Hastritter, 422 East Lake Briar Lane. Hastritter supports the application, and opposes the construction and maintenance standards of the Avimor trails, citing that the standards will incur future maintenance costs. Hastritter answers questions from the Commission. Dustin Hibbard, 702 North Senita Way. Hibbard supports the application, and expresses concerns related to maintaining positive control of the foothills and having developmental control of the area. Dawn Justice, 1922 North Radcliffe Place. Justice opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to Eagle citizens assuming the cost burden of infrastructure improvements. Linda Bowen, 1273 South Willow Way. Bowen opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to proposed density and the ability for the development to "secure adequate public utilities." Curt Smith, 2502 West Timber Drive. Smith opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to existing Eagle citizens shouldering the fiscal burden of new infrastructure. Concerns that Avimor does not want to conform to existing Eagle standards. Fernando Pla, 5798 West Rotherham Drive. Pla opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to there being no net benefit to the existing citizens of Eagle. Concerns related to water availability. Nancy Merrill, 3268 West Skywood Lane. Merrill supports the application and gives her support regarding the design standards of Avimor. Merrill responds to questions the Commission. Nancy Sores, 716 South Arbor Island Way. Sores supports/opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to not annexing now. Provides a recommendation that the City wait for annexation. Don Gray, 230 South Silver -wood Way. Gray supports/opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to the annexation leading to too much fiscal burden on the existing residents of the City. Steven Cole, 6027 West Piaffe Court. Cole opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to crime infill due to developments like Avimor due to too fast of development. Brian White, 6760 West Founder Street. White opposes the application, and expresses concerns related to rapid expansion and lack of infrastructure to support a rapid expansion. Meeting called into five-minute recess. 8:24pm The applicant and the applicant's development team addresses concerns raised during the public hearing and provides rebuttal. Chairman Wright closes the public hearing. Discussion amongst the Commission. Regarding 5A: Smith moves to recommend denial of A-06-22/RZ-06-22 & ZOA-01-22 — Annexation and Rezone with a Development Agreement and Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Establish Development Standards and Processes for the Avimor Planned Development Zoning District — Avimor Development, Spring Valley Livestock, and First American Title as dual beneficiary trust. Seconded by McLaughlin. Discussion amongst the Commission. Page 4 of 5 K:\P&Z\MINUTES\2023\PZ-01-30-23min v2.doc Smith substitutes motion to include the following: 1.) the city receives a formal resolution of the differences between the Tischler Bische and Eberly fiscal impact assessments to ascertain that they have come to the same conclusion. 2.) a statement saying that the Parks, Pathways, and Recreation Commission and the Avimor development have come to an agreement in terms of the structure and maintainability of the pathways and trails. Second concurs. Discussion amongst the Commission. City Planner, Morgan Bessaw, provides clarification for lot dimension standards. THREE AYES ... ONE NAY (Guerber) Guerber moves to approve item 5B. Smith seconds. Discussion amongst the Commission. Zoning Administrator, William Vaughan, provides clarification regarding item 5B. Guerber withdraws motion. McLaughlin moves to recommend denial of A-14-22/RZ-19-22 — Annexation and Rezone for Avimor Village One — Avimor Development as it is not approvable without item 5A being first approved. Seconded by Smith. THREE AYES ... ONE NAY (Guerber). 6. NEW BUSINESS: 7. REPORTS: A. Commission: None. B. City Attorney: None. C. Staff: Staff provides forecasting for the next P&Z Commission Meeting. 8. ADJOURNMENT: Guerber moves to adjourn. Seconded by Wright. ALL AYES... MOTION CARRIES. Hearing no further business, the Commission meeting adjourned at 10:51 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: MATTHEW J. RUMS , CLERK OF THE MEIT G APPROVED: /1 QL TRENT WRIGHT, CHAIRMAN AN AUDIO RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD AT W W W . CITYOFEAGLE. ORG. Page 5 of 5 K:\P&Z\MINUTES\2023\PZ-01-30-23min v2.doc yahoo!finanee Search for news, symbols or companies f FORTUNE V Robert Shiller predicted the 2008 housing bubble. Here's his 2022 call Lance Lambert August 9, 2022 • 4 min read Robert Shiller released a book in 2000 titled Irrational Exuberance, which proclaimed the stock market was a bubble. Soon afterward, the tech bubble burst. Then in 2004, the Yale economics professor called attention to spiking real estate prices with a paper titled Is There a Bubble in the Housing Market? By 2007, Shiller predicted its bust was inevitable. Soon afterward, of course, the 2008 housing bubble burst. As the pandemic housing boom —which has pushed up U.S. home prices by 42% over the past two years —fizzles out, it raises the question: Does Shiller think we're in another housing bubble? On Sunday, Shiller spoke with Yahoo Finance. He told the outlet that he once again thinks the U.S. housing market is headed for trouble. "Home prices haven't fallen since the 2007-09 recession. Right now things look almost as bad," Shiller said. "Existing home sales are down. Permits are down. A lot of signs that we'll see something. It may not be catastrophic, but it's time to consider that." > . SEn« p® W 2 0 o '� A \ C) U w O E ) 2 © , /_ h / k � . / o uj � E > £@ ® o 2 _ o ) � 0 cu � / ?k y £ n - / a k \ CZ§ S Q z - ) Ln _ _o E - � \ � E / ~ o E \ e 6 ? ■ u 2 q e �E 7 > j § ■ I k / § E2 a ® 2 o �_ ° o 3 i R § / ■ \ 0 ) §% C iJ ] § /_« 7� \N CD ® E 0 ¥ E a / z 10 10) � 22 / o w � \\0 z c c u \ � 2 § ƒ _ 0 / . ( \ - = 0 6 L.Lj@ } — / - £ m § Cl) @ £ ° ) 0 § \ -0 % W LLI ^ J r ) | m ƒ / 5 a - \ \ � \ \ � _/ S a ) \z ce . }\ k u ) « \ R 3 / m a w m _ \ o J - 0 j J ° u m pemz e[aml CITY OF EAGLE - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET A-06-22/RZ-06-22 & ZOA-01-22 — Annexation and Rezone with a Development Agreement and Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Establish Development Standards and Processes for the Avimor Planned The appl'.cant is requesting an annexation and rezone from RP (Rural Preservation — Ada County Designation), RR (Rural Residential — Ada County designation), Multiple Use Zone (Boise County designation), and Al (Prime Agriculture — Gem County designation) to A-P-D-DA (Avimor Planned Development with a Development Agreement) and a zoning ordinance amendment to establish development standards and processes for the Avimor Planned Development Zoning District. The 17,522 acre site is anticipated to include up to 8,761 dwelling units and approximately 860,000 square feet of commercial and retail uses. This application includes a CU-18-22 Summers pzfpdf Stadium View Sub pzf.pdf development agreement, economic impact report, master wastewater study, a municipal water and pressurized irrigation system master plan, a master drainage report, grading and hillside development standards, and a habitat management plan. The 17,522 acre site is located on both the east and west side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada, Gem, and Boise Counties. A-14-22/RZ-19-22 — Annexation and Rezone for Avimor Village One — Avimor Development: Avimor Development is requesting an annexation, rezone from PC (Planned Community — Ada County designation) to A-P-D (Avimor Planned Development) for Avimor Village One (portions of Avimor Subdivision No. 1, Avimor Subdivision Nos. 4-11, and Avimor Townhomes North Subdivision). The approximately 657-acre site is already developed with a mix of uses and is located on the east side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada County. January 30, 2023 NAME (PLEASE PRINT) ADDRESS TESTIFY? (Y/N) PRO/CON o'l L���� it CC&% c. �rAn►AS—c2�rt�2 Lk22. C . t_A\<%F- g2taQ LA �G., \� j 20 l� $3G l T �% I / Z S �_ y o' tti tn r.l��,i,��`� 0�� 4� CITY OF EAGLE - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET 4,-06-22/RZ-06-22 & ZOA-01-22 — Annexation and Rezone with a Development A reement and Zonin Ordinance Amendment to Establish Development Standards and Processes for the Avimor Planned The applicant is requesting an annexation and rezone from RP (Rural Preservation — Ada County Designation), RR (Rural Residential — Ada County designation), Multiple Use Zone (Boise County designation), and Al (Prime Agriculture — Gem County designation) to A-P-D-DA (Avimor Planned Development with a Development Agreement) and a zoning ordinance amendment to establish development standards and processes for the Avimor Planned Development Zoning District. The 17,522 acre site is anticipated to include up to 8,761 dwelling units and approximately 860,000 square feet of commercial and retail uses. This application includes a CU-18-22 Summers pzfpdf Stadium View Sub pzf.pdf development agreement, economic impact report, master wastewater study, a municipal water and pressurized irrigation system master plan, a master drainage report, grading and hillside development standards, and a habitat management plan. The 17,522 acre site is located on both the east and west side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada, Gem, and Boise Counties. A-14-22/RZ-19-22 — Annexation and Rezone for Avimor Village One — Avimor Development: Avimor Development is requesting an annexation, rezone from PC (Planned Community — Ada County designation) to A-P-D (Avimor Planned Development) for Avimor Village One (portions of Avimor Subdivision No. 1, Avimor Subdivision Nos. 4-11, and Avimor Townhomes North Subdivision). The approximately 657-acre site is already developed with a mix of uses and is located on the east side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada County. January 30, 2023 NAME (PLEASE PRINT) ADDRESS TESTIFY? (Y/N) PRO/CON r -�-� ✓ �' - �7 CIO i �01 Ile �, 0 CITY OF EAGLE - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET A-06-22/RZ-06-22 & ZOA-01-22 - Annexation and Rezone with a Development Agreement and Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Establish Development Standards and Processes for the Avimor Planned The applicant is requesting an annexation and rezone from RP (Rural Preservation — Ada County Designation), RR (Rural Residential — Ada County designation), Multiple Use Zone (Boise County designation), and Al (Prime Agriculture — Gem County designation) to A-P-D-DA (Avimor Planned Development with a Development Agreement) and a zoning ordinance amendment to establish development standards and processes for the Avimor Planned Development Zoning District. The 17,522 acre site is anticipated to include up to 8,761 dwelling units and approximately 860,000 square feet of commercial and retail uses. This application includes a CU-18-22 Summers pzf.pdf Stadium View Sub pzf.pdf development agreement, economic impact report, master wastewater study, a municipal water and pressurized irrigation system master plan, a master drainage report, grading and hillside development standards, and a habitat management plan. The 17,522 acre site is located on both the east and west side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada, Gem, and Boise Counties. A-14-22/RZ-19-22 — Annexation and Rezone for Avimor Village One — Avimor Development: Avimor Development is requesting an annexation, rezone from PC (Planned Community — Ada County designation) to A-P-D (Avimor Planned Development) for Avimor Village One (portions of Avimor Subdivision No. 1, Avimor Subdivision Nos. 4-11, and Avimor Townhomes North Subdivision). The approximately 657-acre site is already developed with a mix of uses and is located on the east side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada County. January 30, 2023 NAME (PLEASE PRINT) ADDRESS TESTIFY? (Y/N) PRO/CON 71 Vv I7 r /1 U -.- , �. 11 I cL _j C.� C L! 1�,� CITY OF EAGLE - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET A-06-22/RZ-06-22 & ZOA-01-22 — Annexation and Rezone with a Development Agreement and Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Establish Development Standards and Processes for the Avimor Planned The applicant is requesting an annexation and rezone from RP (Rural Preservation — Ada County Designation), RR (Rural Residential — Ada County designation), Multiple Use Zone (Boise County designation), and Al (Prime Agriculture — Gem County designation) to A-P-D-DA (Avimor Planned Development with a Development Agreement) and a zoning ordinance amendment to establish development standards and processes for the Avimor Planned Development Zoning District. The 17,522 acre site is anticipated to include up to 8,761 dwelling units and approximately 860,000 square feet of commercial and retail uses. This application includes a CU-18-22 Summers pzf.pdf Stadium View Sub pzfpdf development agreement, economic impact report, master wastewater study, a municipal water and pressurized irrigation system master plan, a master drainage report, grading and hillside development standards, and a habitat management plan. The 17,522 acre site is located on both the east and west side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada, Gem, and Boise Counties. A-14-22/RZ-19-22 — Annexation and Rezone for Avimor Village One — Avimor Development: Avimor Development is requesting an annexation, rezone from PC (Planned Community — Ada County designation) to A-P-D (Avimor Planned Development) for Avimor Village One (portions of Avimor Subdivision No. 1, Avimor Subdivision Nos. 4-11, and Avimor Townhomes North Subdivision). The approximately 657-acre site is already developed with a mix of uses and is located on the east side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada County. January 30, 2023 NAME (PLEASE PRINT) ADDRESS TESTIFY? (Y/N) PRO/CON 1 Olt Q,kv4etofu)tu yn li�> W�-�\ock n�t VCD 1 1� C-r"kil 14 �J IJ CITY OF EAGLE - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET A-06-22/RZ-06-22 & ZOA-01-22 — Annexation and Rezone with a Development Agreement and Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Establish Development Standards and Processes for the Avimor Planned The applicant is requesting an annexation and rezone from RP (Rural Preservation — Ada County Designation), RR (Rural Residential — Ada County designation), Multiple Use Zone (Boise County designation), and Al (Prime Agriculture — Gem County designation) to A-P-D-DA (Avimor Planned Development with a Development Agreement) and a zoning ordinance amendment to establish development standards and processes for the Avimor Planned Development Zoning District. The 17,522 acre site is anticipated to include up to 8,761 dwelling units and approximately 860,000 square feet of commercial and retail uses. This application includes a CU-18-22 Summers pzfpdf Stadium View Sub pzf.pdf development agreement, economic impact report, master wastewater study, a municipal water and pressurized irrigation system master plan, a master drainage report, grading and hillside development standards, and a habitat management plan. The 17,522 acre site is located on both the east and west side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada, Gem, and Boise Counties. A-14-22/RZ-19-22 — Annexation and Rezone for Avimor Village One — Avimor Development: Avimor Development is requesting an annexation, rezone from PC (Planned Community — Ada County designation) to A-P-D (Avimor Planned Development) for Avimor Village One (portions of Avimor Subdivision No. 1, Avimor Subdivision Nos. 4-11, and Avimor Townhomes North Subdivision). The approximately 657-acre site is already developed with a mix of uses and is located on the east side of Highway 55, approximately 3 miles north of Dry Creek Road in Ada County. January 30, 2023 NAME (PLEASE PRINT) ADDRESS TESTIFY? (Y/N) PRO/CON 4/12/2023 A AV1MOR f t Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission January 30, 2023 1 Rebuttal Topics • Density • Plan approval process • Dimensional standards .Jr • Pathway standards — ------ Conservation easement lands ,0r • Water service and quality ( • Economic impacts r Why annexation 2 1 4/12/2023 Flut-ure� LO-nd Use Map REGIONAL OPENSPACE OVERLAY I• PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BUSINESS PARK MIXED USE TRANSITION OVERLAY FOOTHILLS RESIDENTIAL JDOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER AGRICULTURE/RURAL VILLAGE/COMMUNITY CENTER SCENIC CORRIDOR ESTATE RESIDENTIAL =COMMERCIAL FLOODWAY LARGE LOT INDUSTRIAL NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC COMPACT BUM PARK INFIUL/HIGH DENSITY EAGLE ISLAND SPECIAL USE AREA • Avimor has two Community Center nodes, which support 6-10 units/acre. • Spring Valley has none. 3 Density Comparison V rc\ ■ Spring Valley (� "Al !kxo�l.{M NJ MJ J N aloa � u .ci�v.�tl Z,�'ik+tiMrean^ate V� Avimor I' ring Valley Total Size 17,522 acres 6,017 acres Unit Max 8,761 units 7,160 units Residential Density 0.5 units/acres 1.19 units/acres Spring Valley is 2.4X denser i than Avimor Minimum Open Space 50% 40% Avimor has 6,354 more (8761 acres) (2407 acres) acres of open space * Excluding Village 1 4 2 4/12/2023 Spring Valley Density Base density: 0.5 units / acre Density with bonus: 1.19 units / acre Spring Valley D.A. Section 1.4 The Project is planned for a Base Project Density of 0.5 units per gross acre, or 3,008 dwelling units, and 245 acres for Non -Residential Use. Through the application of the Bonus Density provisions, the Maximum Density may be increased up to 1.19 units per gross acre, not to exceed 7,160 dwelling units, and 245 acres for Non -Residential Use. In the event that any of the Non -Residential Use lands within a Planning Area are developed as residential, Developer may allocate any unused acres for Non - Residential Use to another Planning Area as provided in this section 1. In the event Additional Property is annexed the process is set forth in this section 1. 5 Bonus Density Standards in Comp Plan (6.14.2.B.3) a. Establish a permanent non -city funding source for annual operation and maintenance of open space. Avimor funds open space 0&M through CCRs and Avimor Stewardship Organization. b. Design open space to function on both a neighborhood and regional level with internal and external connectivity for multiple user groups including pedestrians/hikers, bicyclists and equestrians. Avimor has neighborhood and regional, parks and trails, with internal/external connectivity for multiple user groups. c. Work with adjacent land owners to design and dedicate open space on a large scale. Avimor's open space abuts BLM and Spring Valley open space areas to create large regional open space areas. d. Cluster of units into centers and the construction of the land use transect described in Plan. Avimor clusters densities and follows the transect model, building out from the core. e. Provide open space greater than 20% of the gross site area. Avimor provides minimum 50% open space. 0 3 4/12/2023 Avirnor Project Density —Total Acres Total Area at Base Density 17,522 acres 0.5 units/acre 8,761 units Total Area with Density Bonus 17,522 acres 1.19 units/acre 20,851 units 7 Avirnor Project Density — Unconstrained Acres Unconstrained Area (>25% slope) at Base Density 9,875 acres Neighborhood/Community Centers (6-10 un/ac) 480 acres Total Base Density Units Unconstrained Area (>25% slope) with Density 9,875 acres Bonus Neighborhood/Community Centers (6-10 un/ac) 480 acres Total Bonus Density Units 8 0.5 units/acre 4,938 units 8 units/acre 3,840 units 8,778 units 1.19 units/acre 11,751 units 8 units/acre 3,840 units 15,591 units Proposed: 8761 units M 4/12/2023 I Spring Valley PUMP 1 LAND USE DISTRICT LEGEND LAND USE DISTRICT TOTALS VILLAGE CEt:TERiNON RES. 157.00-3 SF MF1 IAEDIUAI CENSITYI.AULTLFAtAILY 265 UNITS SFA I SINGLEFA!AILYA—.11- 4G7 UNITS SFSL SINGLE FAI.AILY SPECIAL LOT 317 UNITS SF3 SINGLE FM111-Y3 G53 UNITS }, �'✓ tk _ -I 72 SINGLE FAIAILY2 Jig UNI is ER7 ESTATE RESIDENTIAL 0UKITS J ;V RESIDEhMAL TOTALS 24199 UNITS .Y ROS REGIONAL OPEN SPACE 332.0,3 AG COS COI VLj NI TY OP E N SPA CE 172.93 AC C� y_ OPEN SPACE TOTALS 535.07 AC '- T I 0 Y' DI - OVERALL LAND USE PLAN °: C) .:•_-�.. DWG PLANNING AtlSPRING VALLEY 10 5 4/12/2023 r � _r r-- i / -_3 11 "IMOR Master land Use Plan Legend . Zoning Land Use Districts Sub -Use Districts I mmmkm MIXED USE/COMMERCIAL SUB -USE MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM LOT MINIMUM MAXIMUM DISTRICT DENSITY LOT AREA COVERAGE SETBACKS HEIGHT See note 3 (XMU) Highway N/A 10%of the site 100%of the site Front: ]S' 68' Mixed Use Interior Side: S' Street Side: 10' Rear: 10' 11.1U1 ' N/A 10: of thc•sit ' 100'e of v[ hoot: 15' SR' f,nix.-J U-• � 1 terior Sidc: 5' Street Side: 10' �I ' RCar:10' (MF21 Medium 16 Units per 30%o/the site N/A Front: id 45' Density Multi- acre Interior Side: 6' Family Street Side: 10' Rear lY (C[) Community 10 Acres .S N/A Front 20' 58' Commercial Interior Side: 0' Street Side: O See Note 7 Rear: 0' (NCI Neighborhood 3 Acres .5 N/A Front 15' <8' Commercial Interior Side: 0' Street Side: 10'See Note 7 Rear: 6' 12 lJ 4/12/2023 Boise County — Phase 1 Subdivision Land Use Map 13 Sub Use District Legend Qwrti.«"N=urx Required with each Subdivision Laid Use Map 1. Subdivision Land Use Map — must show compliance with Master Land Use Plan and compatibility with surrounding designations/uses 2. Parks, Pathways, and Facilities Map — show compliance with Master Open Space Map 3. Conservation Director Approval — show compliance with Habitat Management Plan 4. Project Totals — provide total units, open space, and conservation land tally 5. Transportation Studies — show traffic impacts are mitigated; provide construction truck traffic plan 6. Services — show area is served by essential public services 14 FA 4/12/2023 CONCEPTUAL PLAN' Five Year Plan Av,mor 2022zaz, gypp--; q � j o r AVIMOR w� n 15 Dimensional Standards S° 35' Maximum height for Foothills Residential S T R E E T 19' Driveway minimum w/ apron 16 4/12/2023 Avii-nor Pathways S.' i f �. 17 Avimor Regional Pathway Standards u- Re4ional Pathway •Concrete R Onal Pathway - Natural Surface Renal Pathway- Asphalt Paving 18 9 4/12/2023 NAP 9. NA I.RALSURFACETRAIL - PROPOSED NETWORK MPRrnsMErvTs City fl•..... �.rr-,. a..>,.. EXISTING NETWORK — PAVEDPATHWAYS Master NATURAL SURFACE TRAILS ® EXISTING TNAILNEAD ,J• 4 -- — -- f'— Utib GItl e4aul .G a..,.n v.-,..: i,z ... a ,• - r Plan I OPc'Ru°,PAc YM .n.y.a ' - PROPOSED NETWORK 1 ) r.r.. •« M.4pw •••— PATHWAY KING ...... CORRIDOR COfdiID EAGLE 'I�✓ � • •••••• WATERTRAIL I'. - _ ••Ll PATHWAYBRIDGES . •••••• CAT•I �PAwow,Accvr.onnc I ¢a•....�a.e.avvry ss e� PROPOSED SPOT IMPROVEMENTS NATURAL SURFACE TRAIL Iw - `"`•` ;vL_ •'L 6 s.,o..,.. e. r.>s+c+,•., IMPROVEMENT ,•,,, ,, c+' PATHWAY BRIDGE 0 PATHWAY UNDERPASS - • • - ✓ xe WATERTRAIL IMPROVEMENT ......:' , y—..�SPRIhG S• �• .t Za ,,,, ® IMPROVED TRAILHEAD Y �.� BOUNDARIES STAF. - e�•••.''•F A G LC�,: .a. -' i oATHwnr urvoERPass CITY OF EAGLE m . .... •+'•'+ _ ....� ........ Pf Twr...•...w BLM LAND CITY PARNS •••• �(�•......... ;:tr• ••• may. .,� T... �/ ��1'"/'- ,•YLNY RIDGE TO R IVERS TRAILS ..a sY ka� —Ys ,•, •o •'•::: / •:'•'• OISC d WATER TRNL MRO'/EMENTS ......` yt•..... elta .I ..,...:j� MERIDIAN t \ y A -„ owaaro...un,.. ,,..+•.....,.d w.m 19 mg 10 4/12/2023 AVIMOR ' Open Space Plan Legend I ,J I L ----- _ - Land Use I__I '-1 I- - I •. -- -. .wercmm..nn, wn. n.gn"omooa 21 Eagle Water Service Area I � 1 rrs'f1 LavIMOR PROPERTY ;1 1SAGE -- PROPERTY Elm= rl-=�- 22 11 4/12/2023 TischlerUise Figure 3 Revised Operating Revenues $67,066,000 Library Revenues $15,099,000 Development Impact Fee Revenue $11,734,000 Total Revenues $93,899,000 Total Operating Expenses $65,630,000 Capital Costs $37,271,476 Total Expenditures $102,901,476 Parks LOS Adjusted $8,358,438 Adj. Total Costs $94,543,038 Net Fiscal Impact-$644,038 Eberle Economic Impact Stucly TABLE E —FOURTEEN NET FISCAL IMPACT -EAGLE 2023-2069 Revenue Commercial and Residential Property Tax $66,725,888 State Revenue Sharing $42,884,311 Franchise Fees $30,508,388 Permit Fees $26,252,997 Other Income Inc. Court Fines $374,799 Miscellaneous $8,872,062 Total Revenue $148,735,771 Expenses General Government $46,934,739 PublicSafety $40,911,776 Parks and Streets $21,282,077 Culture and Recreation, Including library $22,766,154 Capital Outlay $14,663,145 Debt Service Interest and Principal $3,173,909 Total Expenses $147,731,780 Net Fiscal Impact $1,003,992 23 Why Annex? • Fulfills Eagle's comprehensive plan vision • City gets a say in how the foothills are developed and protected • Protects over 8,700 acres of open space; estimated value of $100M+ • Hundreds of acres of developed regional parks to serve Eagle residents • Secures public access to funded network of recreational trails • Land donations to: school districts, fire, EMS, police, library, serving Eagle residents • Advances $40M+ in regional transportation improvements to SH55 • 2,400 new jobs annually for life of project; over 900 permanent jobs with annual payroll of $64M • 600-800k SF of commercial uses, adding to Eagle's tax base diversification • Long-term pipeline of variety of housing types to serve Eagle residents 24 12 4/12/2023 Requested Changes to Conditions Regional Pathways and Foothills Trails Approve Title 11B as drafted with foothills specific regional pathway standards. • Allow Avimor Stewardship Organization to manage foothills with public access and easements. Grading Security • Request same as Spring Valley: Provide bond or surety "to ensure that construction will be completed or the property will be stabilized in the event that the work is unable to be completed." Amendment to CC&Rs • Unnecessary for City to oversee all amendments of the community's private covenants. • Proposed condition: "The Avimor Charter shall include provisions for the collection of fees/assessments to adequately fund and maintain open spaces and roadways" Title 11A Amendments Recent Spring Valley amendments do not relate to Avimor. 25 A AVIMOR" Thank You 26 13 4/12/2023 Supplemental Materials 27 Spring Valley Condit -ion -Mass Grading Security 1) Prior to beginning of mass grading operations, the developer shall provide an infrastructure assurance, i.e. a bond or a letter of credit in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Development Agreement, to ensure that construction will be completed or the property will be stabilized in the event that the work is unable to be completed. The engineer of record shall provide certification of the percentage of completion of the grading work to the City for review and approval on a monthly basis or at agreed upon milestones with a minimum of once per quarter during the course of grading operations, as defined in the mass grading permit conditions. Within thirty (30) days of City receipt, the construction infrastructure assurance shall be reduced accordingly, per Section 2.9 of the Development Agreement, to reflect the percentage of approved grading work. 28 14 4/12/2023 Mass G-rading Condit -ion Earthwork —The project engineer will evaluate each grading project to determine a reasonable time and equipment to stabilize any project that may be stopped during construction. The intended site grading stabilization work would repair all vertical cuts and abrupt interfaces with existing terrain and make the site slopes safe, but would not complete all remaining grading. The engineer would refer to equipment and operator hourly rates per the contract to be applied to the stabilization time and provide that cost. Revegetation -The project engineer will evaluate each grading project to determine the limits of disturbance for any project that may be stopped during construction. The disturbed area would be measured and the per acre revegetation contract costs would be applied to provide that cost. SWPPP —The project engineer will assess remaining work efforts and work with SWPPP contractor to establish maintenance costs of the SWPPP until stabilization is complete. Temporary piping — The project engineer will assess the site conditions at work stoppage to determine if additional temporary piping may be required for added project stabilization and erosion control. The engineer will establish installation costs for all required temporary piping. • Engineer's estimate. The engineer will prepare an engineer's estimate of the total stabilization costs as defined above and issue a surety (bonding) letter to the City of Eagle that stipulates these costs and applies a 150% contingency. 29 15