Minutes - 2013 - Design Review - 08/22/2013 - Regular DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES
The Design Review Board met in regular session August 22, 2013, Member Brasher presiding.
1. CALL TO ORDER: Member Brasher calls the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: The following members were present: SAYER, HULL, BRASHER,
MARTIN. ABSENT: MC CULLOUGH, GRUBB. A quorum is present.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
♦ Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one motion.
There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Design Review Board
member, City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent
Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the
Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the Rules of Order.
♦ Any item on the Consent Agenda that contains written recommendations from the
City of Eagle shall be adopted as part of the Design Review's Consent Agenda
approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Minutes of August 8, 2013.
Sayer moves to approve the consent agenda. Seconded by Hull. ALL AYE...MOTION
CARRIES.
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None.
5. NEW BUSINESS:
A. DR-37-13—Remodel Building into an Office Building for Downs Realty—Larry
and Debi Downs: Larry and Debi Downs, represented by James Gipson, are
requesting design review approval to remodel a 940-square foot building into an
office for Downs Realty. This application is also to review the construction of a 555-
square foot addition to the existing building. The 0.28-acre site is located on the west
side of South Eagle Road approximately 700-feet north of State Highway 44 at 221
South Eagle Road.
James Gipson, PO Box 219, Eagle, Idaho, project architect reviews the project. City Planner
Cerda reviews the project. Board discussion.
Brasher moves to approve DR-37-13—Remodel Building into an Office Building for Downs
Realty—Larry and Debi Downs with the site specific and standard conditions of approval
with the following changes:
Site specific condition #1. Rewrite to say the Board unanimously agrees that the elevations
presented, dated 8/1/13 are appropriate for the use and style of the building and the intent
of the code does not apply logically to the use of the structure at this time and therefore the
50% requirement would be relaxed.
Site specific condition #2. The Board unanimously agrees that a planter strip along the
north of the property is not necessary due to the fact that the width of the lot and the
requirements for the parking make that impossible to do the arithmetic, however we do
1
want the landscape buffer on the south to contain shrubs to create a screen for the parking
lot as per code. Also the grading and drainage plans shall be provided to the city and
approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of a permit.
Site specific condition #4. Amend to after the first sentence add that the sidewalk as shown
on the site plan dated 8/1/13 is unanimously approved by the board and feel that is fitting
although not complying with the code due to the property to the north so that there is
congruity with the sidewalks to the north.
Site specific condition #13. The Design Review Board unanimously agrees that the lot
coverage and set back requirements in the code should be relaxed due to the use of this
structure and the fact that it is an existing structure and the spirit of the code for this area
of town does not reasonably apply to the use of this structure. The historical nature and
the benefit of the city for the use of this site outweighs some of this trade off.
Site specific condition #14. The Design Review Board unanimously agrees that the
elevations date stamped 8/1/13, options A and B are approved by the Board no matter what
option is chosen by the applicant.
Site specific condition #15. The applicant shall provide a revised landscaping plan showing
the northern edge of the paving ending at a concrete curb so as to protect the edge of the
pavement. That site plan would be reviewed and approved by two members of the Design
Review Board and staff.
Site specific condition #5. The revised site plan will be approved by staff and two members
of the Design Review Board.
Site specific condition #16. The applicant shall provide a revised landscape plan showing
additional shrubs or landscaping on the eastern side of the building and southern side of
the building as well as alternative plantings for the courtyard area. The landscape plan
will be approved by staff and two members of the Design Review Board. Seconded by
Sayer. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
B. DR-38-13—Two Building Wall Signs for Downs Realty —Larry and Debi
Downs: Larry and Debi Downs, represented by James Gipson, are requesting design
review sign approval to construct two non- illuminated building wall signs for Downs
Realty. The site is located on the west side of South Eagle Road approximately 700-
feet north of State Highway 44 at 221 South Eagle Road.
James Gipson, PO Box 219, Eagle, Idaho reviews the project. Staff has nothing to add. Board
discussion.
Brasher moves to approve DR-38-13—Two Building Wall Signs for Downs Realty —Larry
and Debi Downs with the site specific and standard conditions of approval. Seconded by
Hull. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
C. DR-39-13—Common Area Landscaping within Ashbury Subdivision—SCS
Brighton LLC: SCS Brighton LLC, represented by Michael Wardle, is requesting
design review approval of the common area landscaping within Ashbury Subdivision.
The 40.37-acre site is locate on the west side of Meridian Road approximately '/4-mile
north of Chinden Boulevard at 6825 North Meridian Road.
Member Hull recuses himself from this item.
2
Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation, reviews the project. City Planner Cerda reviews the
application. Board discussion.
Brasher moves to approve DR-39-13—Common Area Landscaping within Ashbury
Subdivision—SCS Brighton LLC with the site specific and standard conditions of approval
with the following changes.
Site specific condition #2. Strike. Further discussion. Seconded by Sayer. ALL
AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
D. DR-40-13—Ashbury Subdivision Entry Signage—SCS Brighton LLC: SCS
Brighton LLC, represented by Michael Wardle, is requesting design review sign
approval to construct an entry feature with signage for Ashbury Subdivision. The site
is located on the west side of Meridian Road approximately '/4-mile north of Chinden
Boulevard at 6825 North Meridian Road.
Member Hull recuses himself from this item. Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation reviews the
project. David Koga, 426 E. Shore Drive, the Land Group reviews the application. Staff has
nothing further to add. Board discussion.
Brasher moves to approve DR-40-13—Ashbury Subdivision Entry Signage—SCS Brighton
LLC with the site specific and standard conditions of approval. Seconded by Sayer. ALL
AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
6. REPORTS:
A. Design Review Board: None.
B. Staff: None.
7. ADJOURNMENT:
Brasher moves to adjourn at 7:25 p.m. Seconded by Sayer. ALL AYE...MOTION
CARRIES.
rrrrrrur.••,•
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: r•��.0�,EpGff�'•.,,�
44.1 gotA4'0. *,'
U
p r
I
sv S�p'ti�
�
SHARON K. BERGMANN Kf • r
CITY CLERK/TREASURER '.'•.„STA pF ,,
„••a•auarrrr
3
APPROVED:
VIII
CRAIG ER
BOARD MEMBER
AN AUDIO RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL UPON
REQUEST.
4
BRIGHTON
CORPORA
04-11
August 22, 2013
To City of Eagle Design Review Board
From Michael Wardle, Director of Planning
Subject Ashbury Common Area Landscaping (DR -39-13) & Subdivision Entry
Signage (DR -40-13)
With one exception, Brighton concurs with staff's analysis and recommendations for
approval of the Ashbury Subdivision common area landscaping and entry signage
applications.
The sole exception concerns DR -39-13 Site Specific Condition of Approval No. 2 which
reads...
"Provide documentation indicating that the home owner of 3125 West Sugarberry Drive has
agreed to any visual mitigation between the proposed subdivision and the home owner's
residence prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat."
The referenced "home owner's" principal concern was not "visual mitigation;" his
stated request to the City Council was for larger lots along Meridian Road. Initially, the
Council responded favorably to that request, even though the proposed "2 units per acre"
lots are fully compliant with the approved concept plan (attached) as incorporated into
the project development agreement. Upon reflection and reconsideration, the Council
proposed the "visual mitigation" condition rather than a reduction in the number of lots.
We met with the home owner at the site and have proposed subsequent meetings with our
landscape consultant and staff to consider landscape enhancements. The home owner's
response has been to "hold" until he has the opportunity to meet with the Eagle City
Attorney. We are not aware that such a meeting has occurred.
Photographs provided with the application, and included in the staff report, clearly show
that additional "visual mitigation" is unlikely to satisfy the concern since there is no
visual impact on the property. The landscape plan excerpt on the following page depicts
the intensity of buffering provided along Meridian Road opposite 3125 West Sugarberry.
When combined with the existing, nearly solid landscape buffer on the east side of the
street, we are confident that the Council's objective will be fully realized.
Therefore, we ask the Design Review Board to delete Condition No. 2 from its approval
of DR -39-13 since the matter will ultimately be decided by the City Council when it acts
on the Ashbury Subdivision No. 1 final plat.
Brighton Corporation 12601 W. Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho 83713
www.brightoncorp.com Tel. (208) 378-4000 Fax (208) 377-8962
N
sS. 8--
M,8
Wia
•
■
0 RI
0
OCK 6
If
..4 -
•
■
■
■
▪ 3125 W. Sugarberry frontage on Meridian Road — 251.15 feet
AL
■
■
1
000
Cpa
-v
N rp
N N
O 0
W N
ssau!sng pooq.zogq ha
i1P./atutuoD rias
aauds uadp
a i it .zad SJ 1I aa:IIt j
t
d s -p u l mita
..[ad 1(yn auto.,•
ueId
pa,t.zasa.l d
ay o. ssaaad
UILUO�
3eIOV 213d S11Nn z
coeds uedp
3J3V N3d S.LINn £
Ashhuly Vicinity Map
6
0 =
•
• • • -0- • -• • • * • • .
- 0 • a. 05:0* • f*- 1 '• • •ft
40 - • • .
0 • X: 0
. •• 0 • ( • , • .
• . lirs, ..
a 4 4
0 • 0 • 1 •
• • is -4 • • • • . • . •
• . . . • • i • ,
. • iii • - • cr *
4 • ii • • a • • * win • • 1
... • I • • 4 do -wikem • 0
•
a • 0 • , !est 1pg •--,, e •-• - - • ,..._
a, •
• • • • • • • Its, 00Q, t • • • 'IP.
0 • I
• • iiw• •64•4
11 er
• • N•44. .11L-*L.-ej i vas*
.-
• • • • • • -•
•f 040,44„.. _Imo •• 111 0
g ''
•• 6 10 •• at -•-••••
• • le • ..- • •
i sd
e 4
h a* ;
1 a i I/ 1•
, !
,
• * J a 4
Ashbury Subdivision
Eagle, Idaho
4410 5/8
W 1/4 S. 19
crr No
7513770
PLAT SnOWV1G
SUGARBERRY WOODS SUBDIVISION NO. 1
LOCAICI N 4411' 44E 1/4 SW 1/4 AND LOT 5. SW 1/4
5201105 14 7.44.. R 1E.. 811..
ADA COUNTY 0440
1995
NTA. P0111 O/ PLAT CLCARVUE 151471S 511001N510N
(7._
8
O N 3
8
20
0 ,� O
589'4310[
d
C
0 L 1
. 19880 _ c -H
-.n. 589'4310[ O C.7 ��7,�
29888 r 0 1'_3 h 36 c 15 1-16
s,.4,_ L -: '° c -± - *J 10 __� 05 A T y 1c lJtJC_ _ DId17C _
4930 L -z
36 • c-8 7-+- 6 `jO _ S
n 9.\5844410'[ 561 O • iYC_4 : -10.41 1231Q L -l5 [:-19 0*J i�. C-2?
u v N 5000 C_II 1231Q S3g8j I
. 3 4 I c 4 981 C'21�
3 4 cP c-12 c_
i mac 3 zo
r �� rO N � ()
N N n
o �� ^ 1 N
2000 n 0
1 •5843240( 73700
y 757 00 5 r2i O H
iT 8 2 "1 2043-. .2644
N• c r
2
- ---
0 N
S.644 3'1C T. 240 '.94'
21200 - ._
26600 24700
- n
D. r` n
o n c
N m N 4
O
3 o n 4 z 5 v
i N n
O
z
6
h
2
S 64 32 45 T 257 00
241 00
O
0
O
ry n �rj/
1a0�Vl \
11IP.
11
I' (4
30 _ 29100 .L __ -
. 11/.9'32'45V. lb- 321.00'
et el
`
O n
24 44
25
30 CPT' 40 7704553
2'10 00
Nb447 031V.
1/
GRAPHIC SCALE
1141
1 1005 - 100 4.
5.8450'551 2420 72'
LNPL AT TCO
BASIS OF BrARNG
1 U.S. HIGHWAY 20-26 C 1t1DCN BLVD.
n P
0
3
1 CLWA RADUS
C-1 17500
L-2 20.00
0-3 20 00
0-4 2.)}900'
C-5 "LY900
0-6 30000
C-7 300.00
C-8 175 00
0-1 20000
0-10 20000
C-11 22500
C-12 20.00
0-13 2000
0-14 225.00
C-15 725.00
C-10 72500
C-17 70000
0-16 67500
C-19 67500
C-20 72500'
C-21 700 00
C-22 675 DO
C-23 675.00
0-24 22500
C-25 22500
C-24 20000
8006 LittFAGE 10 101
UVC DATA
i 4J 5(J TANGENT76.06 I DEL TA
134 ¢ 7S OW28 V 408902'
31.48 20.06 /8813' .44 738-* 9010 25'
126.31.54 64.6` 115219' 5 75'13101. 2900 00'
131.14 71.11 137 71' '5 751510'1. 240000'
9813 4442' 98.48' 80'1010112 1833 39'
52.91' 20332.85 05'46'20'w. 10'00'21'
12481' 66.05 16.85' 198'10'W 4230 00'
700.61 51-31 94.1 5.75 0750'[. 26'4120'
47.75 23.94 47.63 n.83'37102 13'4040'
71.63 30.12' 71.32' 5.6450101 1814'27"
27 72'! 16.61 25.55 5.3415'08'1. 7424'45'
27 7/ 16.61 25.56 5,40'0950'W 742511'
12.15 6.08 12.15 417814381. 05053.'
18768 44.37' 187.15 5.84114W 14'4454'
223.5/ 7'
1 112.66 222.68' 4.7433'13'W- 174000'
317.061 20403' 391.76 5.8088101 32'30 00"
143.62 I 72.06 14_`V35 1,5.8082'2r/4.82 52 33'1. 1211 26'
328 11'1 120.9060 4"L" 3289.32 S.83'41'051. 2555 zole 49'
316.84/161.16 314.10 5.83'41'051 25'5549'
241.061 121-83 239.78 111508701'W 20'2741'
64 431 32.24 64 40' 5.80'0508W.. 052808'
49.13'I 24 GG 4403 5.84301811 12 30 34'
135.36 1 5931 133.3. 4.043411"W 34'28 28'
104.01 1 6693 1 159.45 5 73 04281. 465902'
LCWit)
0 FOLPO BRASS CAP
0 SCT 5/8.1 30' RLBAR w/rLASTC CAP
• SCT 1/2' 1 24' MAR w/PLASTC CAP
ID 410 5/8' MAR W/MASTC CAP
SET 11501 A 2' OISCE DY.,) RON PK
ACCEPTED 443 OSEO AS THE INITIAL
00147 MO4UMEA17.
kJ U SiliCe219071 8011434.17
'"!LOT LNC
114 OU 20 I1 1 W
_,16998 LJ _ _- GCNTCRLP!
460.00 53411�L. 2.43.0q-
PERMANENT RALE TILITLS. 11015GATION
MO DRAM GE CASCKM
LNC 14DL1
LK BCARNC 051
1-1 4.027.15.1 20.00
1-2 570 43 101 1048'
1-3 4.83'21012 786'
L-4 60'2715( 2000
NQT[�j ' STREET NAME CHANGES PER
AFFIDAVIT INST R 107003566
1 ripriUm DULDNG SETBACK LKS SHALL 8C IN ACCOROANCC WITH 711 CITY 0/
CAG.[ 204010 014AKE AT 111E IRE 01 ISSIJANCC 01' 711E 01.L17F4G PERK/
OR A5 SPECIFICALLY APPROVED.
2. AM RESIJDOM904 Or THIS FLAT WAIL corny *TRI 1111' ArrLCABLE (04015
REGLL*110N5 AT 141E TPL Of Resuscmsoft
3. LLL LOT LKS GOIT704 TO A RELIC R1G41 Of WAY MAK A 12' *IX PCIRNN1117
rtem UTLRLS. F88C.A1101,4. DRANACL MO STREET LC IT CASEKNT.
4. CAC+1 SCK or 008?iON LOT LPCS 1145 A 5' RDE PCR ANENT PLEJG LTIL4ES.
R10GAT10N AND MANAGE EASCKM. LPILLSS OTIICRV85C NOTED.
5. 71115 SUBEMS1044 15 5118.[1.1 10 GOM'1L iCE WRT1 TNR DM10 GOD[ 5801014
31-3605 PCRTAPOIG 10 F88C.ADON WATERS. 14715C.AT10/1 WATER 15 AVALABL1
6. LOT 1. BLOCK 1 M43 LOT 3. BLOCK 3 An 4111(81 DESIGNATED 45 LANDSCAPE
AREAS. TO BC OwKD AND 1ANTA1CD 87 1111' NOKOwfi15 ASSOCIATION
7. RELEVANT SI.RKYS Of RECORD' 440 1574. 440 12151 AFD NO 757.
6. NANTLNMCE Of MY 11:18C.ATI044 OR CWJIIAGC ITC CROSSN0 A LOT 45 THE
RESPONSCIIrr OF THAT LOT OWIER U44E55 TK RESFONSELRY 15 A55&JID
07 AN 1•4IWTION/1 A 2AG( DISTRCT.
4 DIRECT LOT ACCESS TO NORTH FERRAN ROAD L5 PRONCTrai. PLCEPT FOR
LOTS 1 AND 2. BLOCK 3.
10. 7115 X80\461044 r5 SLRLECT TO mer LFMORM D R 1*4G CODE OBC) AS
REGULATED 8Y Tiff LRT Of LACK.
11. ALL 41O4C5 8010 CCNSTI¢CT1D WRT1 FOr.DUAL SCPTC 57511415 41ST IAV[
TK SEPTIC 5151[145 PLACED ON TK STREET SDC Of 1M NOK.
5404841 DWG
DEVELOPERS'
LOON AND DLCO SALFDCRS
P 0 501 1000
1L`RCUN. D4410 63610
(2083 886-7457
J.J nOW4R0 CNCNEER
BOISE DA1O
WEE 1 04' 3