Loading...
Minutes - 2002 - Design Review - 07/11/2002 - Regular /' DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES July 11, 2002 OR 'SINAL The Design Review Board met in regular session on July 11, 2002, Chairman Murray presiding. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Murray called the meeting to order at 6:10 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: The following members were present: MURRAY, MC CULLOUGH, BARNES, PAULSON, STANGER, COUNCIL LIAISON MERRILL. Absent: CHRISTENSEN. A quorum is present. 3. CONSENT AGENDA. . Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Design Review Board member, City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the Rules of Order. . Any item on the Consent Agenda that contains written recommendations from the City of Eagle shall be adopted as part of the Design Review's Consent Agenda approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise. A. Minutes of June 13, 2002. B. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-15-02 - Master Si2n Plan for Ea2le River Development - Ea2le River LLC: Eagle River LLC, represented by Debbie Anderson with Idaho Electric Signs, is requesting design review approval of a master sign plan for the commercial area within Eagle River Development. The site is located on the southeast corner of Eagle Road and State Highway 44. The applicant is present and agrees with the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the staff report. No one from the public chooses to speak. This item will remain on the consent agenda. C. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-29-02 - Monument Sim. Fuel Island Canopy Sh!n. and Fuel Pump Sims for Tesoro Petroleum at Justo's Grocerv - Tesoro Petroleum: Tesoro Petroleum, represented by John Scheffey with Core States Engineering, is requesting design review approval to construct a new monument sign, fuel island canopy sign with decals, and fuel pump signs at Justo's Grocery. The site is located on the northwest corner of State Street and Stierman Way at 518 East State Street. Barnes moves to remove item 3C, 3D, 3F and 3G from the consent agenda. D. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-31-02 - Common Area Landscapin2 within Brookwood Subdivision No.6 - Aires Development LLC: Aires Development LLC, represented by Phil Hull with The Land Group, is requesting design review approval of the common area landscaping within Page 1 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc Brookwood Subdivision No.6. The site is located north of Floating Feather Road adjacent to Brookwood Subdivision No.4 and Feather Nest Estates. This item was removed from the consent agenda. E. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-32-02 - Common Area Landscapin2 within Henrv's Subdivision - Northwest Development LLC: Northwest Development LLC, represented by Phil Hull with The Land Group, is requesting design review approval of the common area landscaping within Henry's Subdivision. The site is located Y2-mile north of Floating Feather Road on the west side of Meridian Road. The applicant is not present. No one from the public chooses to speak. This item will remain on the consent agenda. F. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-33-02 - Wri2ht Brothers Office Buildin2 - Kittyhawk Investments: Kittyhawk Investments, represented by BRS Architects, is requesting design review approval to construct phase one of a three phased office/retail project. This application is for the review and approval to construct a 5,088-square foot office building. The site is located on the south side of State Street within Periwinkle Subdivision at 779 East State Street (Lot 4, Block 1, Periwinkle Subdivision). This item was removed from the consent agenda. G. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-34-02 - RetaiVOfflce Buildin2 within Ea21e River Development - Grossman Company Properties: Grossman Company Properties, represented by BRS Architects, is requesting design review approval to construct a 9,504-square foot retailloffice building. The site is located on the south side of Riverside Drive approximately 1A-mile east of Eagle Road within Eagle River Development (proposed Lot 6, Block 2, Mixed Use Subdivision No.3). This item was removed from the consent agenda. Paulson moves that the consent agenda consist of items 3A, 3B and 3E. Seconded by McCullough. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES. C. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-29-02 - Monument Si2n. Fuel Island Canopy Si2n. and Fuel Pump Si2ns for Tesoro Petroleum at Justo's Grocerv - Tesoro Petroleum: Tesoro Petroleum, represented by John Scheffey with Core States Engineering, is requesting design review approval to construct a new monument sign, fuel island canopy sign with decals, and fuel pump signs at Justo's Grocery. The site is located on the northwest comer of State Street and Stierman Way at 518 East State Street. Murray would like to change site specific condition #4 to read as follows: The shields should be installed prior to completion of the permitted signage. Barnes moves to approve DR-29-02 - Monument Sign, Fuel Island Canopy Sign, and Fuel Pump Signs for Tesoro Petroleum at Justo's Grocery as modified. Seconded by Paulson. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. Page 2 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc D. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-31-02 - Common Area Landscapin2 within Brookwood Subdiyision No.6 - Aires Development LLC: Aires Development LLC, represented by Phil Hull with The Land Group, is requesting design review approval of the common area landscaping within Brookwood Subdivision No.6. The site is located north of Floating Feather Road adjacent to Brookwood Subdivision No.4 and Feather Nest Estates. The applicant has requested that the Board review site specific condition #4. McCullough moves to remove site specific condition #4 from the site specific conditions under the findings and facts of conclusions of law. Seconded by Barnes. The applicant agrees with the site specific conditions as modified. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. F. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-33-02 - Wri2ht Brothers Office Buildin2 - Kittvhawk Investments: Kittyhawk Investments, represented by BRS Architects, is requesting design review approval to construct phase one of a three phased office/retail project. This application is for the review and approval to construct a 5,088-square foot office building. The site is located on the south side of State Street within Periwinkle Subdivision at 779 East State Street (Lot 4, Block 1, Periwinkle Subdivision). Murray would like to correct site specific condition #2, line 3 to read "wood" fence instead of "food" fence. Paulson moves to accept the modification of site specific condition #2 as stated. Seconded by Barnes. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. G. Findin2s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for DR-34-02 - RetaiVOffice Buildin2 within Ea21e River Development - Grossman Company Properties: Grossman Company Properties, represented by BRS Architects, is requesting design review approval to construct a 9,504-square foot retail/office building. The site is located on the south side of Riverside Drive approximately lA-mile east of Eagle Road within Eagle River Development (proposed Lot 6, Block 2, Mixed Use Subdivision No.3). The applicant has requested that site specific condition #11 be modified to change to a chain drop system. Also change site specific condition #13, change the language by removing words "extremely pricey" and rewrite sentence. The applicant is present and agrees with site specific conditions as amended. Barnes moves to amend findings of facts and conclusions of law for DR-34-02 - RetaiVOffice Building within Eagle River Development under site specific condition #11 to read as follows: The roof drainage shall be of a chain drop system as indicated by the applicant. Site specific condition #13 shall be rewritten as follows: The applicant would like to submit a different light fixture that is similar in design to what was proposed. The applicant will provide a revised parking lot fixture detail to be reviewed by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. Seconded by McCullough. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. Page 3 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc 4. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None PUBLIC HEARING: A. DR-80-01 - Two Multi-Tenant Buildin2s - Mike Nihill: Mike Nihill, represented by Mark Butler with Land Consultants Inc., is requesting design review approval to construct two multi-tenant commercial buildings. The 2.6-acre site is located on the east side of 2nd Street approximately 1,500-feet south of State Street. This item was continued from the June 13, 2002 meeting. Staff has requested that this item be continued to the August 2002 meeting. Barnes moves to continue item DR- 80-02 - Two Multi-Tenant Buildings as per staffs request to the August meeting. Seconded by Paulson. Barnes moves to amend the motion to DR-80-01. Second concurs. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. B. DR-30-02 - Ea2le Familv Worship Church Facilitv - Ea21e Familv Worship: Eagle Family Worship, represented by Shawn Nickel with Land Consultants Inc., is requesting design review approval to construct two phases of a three phased church facility. This application is for the review and approval of a 23,200-square foot building and to convert a 1,300-square foot residential home into an office. This 4.9- acre site is located on the northeast comer of Floating Feather Road and Park Lane at 3838 Floating Feather Road. This item was continued from the May 16,2002 meeting. Mark Butler, 52 N. Second Street reviews the application. Staff reviews the application with the Board. Mr. Butler addresses the Board regarding the modified conditions. the Board. McCullough moves to approve DR-30-02 - Eagle Family Worship Church Facility- Eagle Family Worship with the site specific and standard conditions of approval, modifying the existing site specific conditions as follows: Site specific condition #3 shall have the following added: The landscape buffers shall be increased and redesigned to within 9 ft of the edge of pavement along Park Lane and Floating Feather to extend along Floating Feather in phase two and continue within phase 3. Site specific condition #5 shall read as follows: In addition to what is existing upon the application for construction of phase 3 the parking shall be reevaluated with regards to non-competing use of the existing phases. Strike site specific condition #7. Add site specific condition #12 as follows: The applicant will be required to provide drawings and details and material samples of the storage and maintenance buildings proposed with phase 1. Site specific condition #13 shall read as follows: In addition to the above Discussion amongst Page 4 of 13 K:\DESLREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc requirements for the new landscape plan, the new landscape plan for phase 3 shall address the open play area to be irrigated with an underground sprinkler system to be graded and seeded with lawn. This requirement shall be in lieu of the landscape buffer along Floating Feather from the end of phase 2 to the eastern end of the property. Site specific condition #14 shall read as follows: The new landscape plan provided shall also address the interior courtyard plan for phase 2 and a time line for installation of the redesign. Seconded by Paulson. Discussion. McCullough amends the motion, at the end of the first sentence site specific condition #1, ending with frontage should continue with Park Lane and Floating Feather. Amend site specific condition #13 as follows: The irrigated graded and seeded lawn areas shall be addressed for all areas other than phase 1 and shall be installed with phase 1. An asphalt pathway connecting with the Floating Feather side of phase 2 shall continue to the eastern property line and shall also be installed with phase 1. Add site specific condition #15 to read as follows: The Design Review Board has reviewed the new building design from an 8 1/2 x 11 sheet. A new plan providing additional detailing, including more of a contrast in color between the siding and the stucco shall be provided to the Design Review Board and presented as an unfinished business item at a future meeting. Second concurs. Discussion. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. C. DR-35-02 - Master Si2n Plan for the Ranch Buildin2 within Rockv Mountain Business Park - Heartland Construction: Heartland Construction, represented by George Transtrum, is requesting design review approval of a master sign plan for the Ranch Building. The site is located on the south side of State Street approximately 200-feet east of Plaza Drive within the Rocky Mountain Business Park at 1121 East State Street. This item was continued from the June 13, 2002 meeting. George Transtrum, 550 W State Street apologizes for missing the June meeting and discusses the application. Staff reviews the application. Murray opens the public hearing. Murray closes the public hearing. Discussion. McCullough moves to approve DR-35-02 - Master Sign Plan for the Ranch Building within Rocky Mountain Business Park - Heartland Construction with the following modifications to the site specific conditions and standard conditions of approval: Site specific condition #7 shall be modified to read as follows: In addition to what is existing, the back ground color placed on the rusticated steel shall be consistent Page 5 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc throughout all the placards on the sign as well as the placards placed on the building and will be of a color complimentary to the lighter colors on the building. Site specific condition #11 shall read as follows: No banner signs what so ever shall be allowed in the lawn area. Site specific condition #12 shall read as follows: The sonotube pillars on the sign proposed will be stucco similar in color to the sonotube pillars at the building entrance. Site specific condition #13 shall read as follows: The applicant will provide a license agreement for any landscaping on the public right of way or adjust the sign location to the south so that new proposed landscaping would be entirely upon this property. Site specific condition #14 shall read as follows: A new landscaping plan will be provided with redesign on each side of the new sign to include taller plants stepping down to smaller plants in order to anchor the pillars of the sign to the ground. The new landscaping plan will address the appropriate landscaping to screen the light fixtures year round. This landscaping plan shall be provided to staff and one member of the Design Review Board. Seconded by Barnes. Discussion. McCullough moves to amend the motion as follows: Strike site specific condition #3, #5 and #6. Also would like to amend site specific condition #14 as follows: This new landscaping plan shall include an area no less than 80 square feet for landscaping. The Design Review Board recognizes the limitations of the space in maintaining 100 square ft., 80 sq. feet would be acceptable. Second concurs. Discussion. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. D. DR-36-02 - Bledsoe Flex Space Buildin2 within Rockv Mountain Business Park- Steve Bledsoe: Steve Bledsoe, represented by George Transtrum with Heartland Construction, is requesting design review approval to construct a 18,370-square foot flex space building within the Rocky Mountain Business Park. The site is located on the north side of Iron Eagle Drive, approximately 300-feet west of Edgewood Lane at 1468 East Iron Eagle Drive (Lot 2, Block 1, Merrill Subdivision No.2). Walter Lindren, with Johnson Architects reviews the application. Tom South, 2002 South Vista Ave., discusses parking issues and landscaping. George Transtrum, 550 W. State Street reviews the application. Staff reviews the application. Murray opens the public hearing. Murray closes the public hearing. Discussion amongst the Board. Barnes moves to approve DR-36-02 - Bledsoe Flex Space Building within Rocky Mountain Business Park with the site specific conditions of approval and standard conditions of approval set forth in the staff report with the following revisions to the Page 6 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc site specific conditions of approval: Site specific #3 shall read as follows: Provide a reyised landscaping plan showing minimum of 10% interior landscaping within the parking lot. If this can be accomplished without changing the size and elevations of the building, the revised landscape plan can be viewed by staff and one member of the Board, if that is not able to be accomplished, this item needs to be brought back at the next Board meeting, regularly scheduled. Site specific condition #4 shall have the following added: Provide a cut sheet of a light fixture showing less projection from the building. Site specific condition #5 shall have the following sentence added: If a question arises between the windows and doors as opposed to the walkways we should default to the floor plan as shown. Site specific condition #9 shall read as follows: It is the opinion of the Design Review Board that the metal roofing as indicated on the plans should be the roofing of choice. Site specific condition #10 shall read as follows: It is the request of the Design Review Board that the following items be submitted as an unfinished business, further definition of color for the building, parking lot lighting showing one light fixture in the north west corner adjacent to the trash enclosure and any design revisions, if needed, as stated in site specific condition #3. Seconded by Stanger. Discussion. Barnes moves to amend the motion. Site specific condition #9 shall read as follows: The applicant had indicated a desire for an alternate roofing be permitted, the Design Review Board does not wish to permit an alternate roof material, other than the metal as shown. Site specific condition #10 shall be revised as follows: The Board wishes to define the colors to be used on this building so as to show a little more disparity in color and to get away from the more bland look of the building as the color board has indicated. Site specific condition #11 shall read as follows: The new landscape plan shall include larger plant material on the front profile of the building in order to break up the large frontal plane. Large plant material shall be placed around trash enclosure per City Code. Site specific condition #5, change to site plan rather than floor plan. Second concurs. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES. E. DR-38-02 - Six Professional Office Buildin2s and Common Area Landscapin2 within Cottonwood Creek Subdivision - Cottonwood Creek LLC: Cottonwood Creek LLC, represented by David Waldron, is requesting design review approval to construct six (6) 5,300-square foot professional office buildings and common area landscaping within Cottonwood Creek Subdivision. The site is located on the west side of Eagle Road approximately 150-feet north of Co1chester Drive at 2421 North Eagle Road. Page 7 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc Don Nicrom, 1403 Mace Road, Eagle, one of the principals of the development reviews the application. Jeremy Ainsworth, 128 S. Eagle Rd., represents the Land Group and discusses the application. Dave Waldron, 1933 Springbrook Lane, Boise, architect for the project reviews the application. Staff reviews the application. Murray opens the public hearing. Murray closes the public hearing. Discussion. Murray moves to approve DR-38-02 - Six Professional Office Buildings and Common Area Landscaping within Cottonwood Creek Subdivision with the site specific and standard conditions of approval set forth in the staff report with the following amendments to the site specific conditions of approval: Site specific condition #4 shall have the following sentence added: At the July 2002 Design Review Board meeting the applicant provided supplemental information indicating compliance with this particular site specific condition, that information shall be reviewed by staff and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. Site specific condition #7 shall have the following added: The applicant shall be required to provide protection on the two existing trees within the cul-de-sac as required under site specific condition #3. Should the construction of this cul-de-sac warrant their removal, a revised landscape plan for the cul-de-sac shall be presented to staff and one member of the Design Review Board. Site specific condition #13 shall read as follows: The Design Review Board has reviewed the report provided by Jerry Stahlsmith evaluating the existing trees and makes the following recommendations: Tree #5 shall removed without penalty, tree #6 shall be relocated and saved, tree #7 shall be relocated and saved, tree #8 shall be relocated and saved, tree #9 shall be removed without penalty, tree #10 shall be saved, tree #11 shall be removed without penalty, trees in area 12, 13, and 14 retained as identified. Trees in area 15 shall be thinned to accommodate the construction of the parking lot. Trees in area 16 shall be saved. Trees in area 17 shall be removed without penalty. Trees in areas 18 & 19 shall be saved. Trees in area 20 shall be removed without penalty. Trees in area 21 & 22 shall be saved and the Design Review Board supports the removal of all Russian Olives with the exception of area 22. Site specific condition #14 shall read as follows: The applicant shall be required to provide an undulating berm along the frontage of Eagle Road to provide vertical movement of the grade to a maximum height of 3 ft. and a minimum height of 1 ft. along the street perimeter. The design shall be reviewed by staff and one member of the Design Review Board prior to issuance of a building permit. The berm shall vary in that distance from the center line of Eagle Road and not from the location of Page 8 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc the current property. Site specific condition #15 shaD read as follows: The applicant shall be required to tie into the existing pedestrian pathway in Banbury Meadows on the south side of the property. Site specific condition #16 shall read as follows: The applicant shall be required to show a lighting photometric plan of the commercial site that indicates compliance with Eagle City Code for lighting of parking lots. The applicant has identified that a series of lighting types, i.e., bollards, landscape lighting and building lighting shall be used to accommodate that lighting need. Should additional light fixtures be required, said fixtures shall be reviewed by staff and one member of the Design Review Board prior to issuance of a building permit. Site specific condition #17 shall read as follows: The applicant shall be required to provide a revised landscaping plan showing the three buildings on the south side of this development to provide a connection between the individual landscape perimeters. Site specific condition #18 shall read as follows: The applicant is requested to provide landscaping differences in the front entrances to the buildings to provide a subtle change in appearance. The differences can be considered in landscape material, species, type and color. Site specific condition #19 shall read as follows: The applicant is encouraged to provide subtle changes to the building architecture with respect to material selections and color. It is not the intent of the Design Review Board to provide individual identities for all buildings, but promote harmony among the building design rather than identical color and material pallets in each building. Site specific condition #20 shall read as follows: The historic light fixtures that are shown as street lighting within this development shall have a solid finial and be dark sky tolerant. The revised lighting fixture shall be reviewed by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. Site specific condition #21 shall read as follows: The applicant shall be required to identify the exterior walkway or pathway transition to be either a stepping stone or hardscape at time of building permit. Those stepping stones or pathway shall be incorporated in the landscape design. Going back to site specific condition #5: The landscape lighting, monument sign lighting and bollard lighting within the commercial section of this development, the Design Review Board supports the use of metal halide fixtures since the applicant has identified compliance with Eagle City Code 8-4-4-2 (A) (7) (a), (b), and (c). Site specific condition #22 shall read as follows: The Design Review Board supports the location of the phasing line as identified on landscape plan DR-2, dated 5-28-02. Site specific condition #23 shall read as follows: The applicant has identified that all roof top drainage for these commercial buildings will be handled through perimeter gutter and down spout collections. Page 9 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc The Design Review Board supports the unique design and layout of this development and considers it a great example of blending the commercial and built environment with the natural environment that surrounds. Seconded by Paulson. Discussion. Murray amends the motion with regard to roof drainage that it be a series of perimeter gutters and chain drops rather than down spouts. Second concurs. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. F. DR-39-02 - Common Area Landscapin2 within Timberland Estates Subdivision - Capital Development LLC: Capital Development LLC, represented by David Koga with The Land Group, is requesting design review approval of the common area landscaping within Timberland Estates Subdivision. The site is located on the north side of State Highway 44 approximately lA-mile west of Ballantyne Road at 2800 West State Street. Jeremy Ainsworth with The Land Group, 128 S Eagle Rd. reviews the application. Discussion. Staff reviews the application. Murray opens the public hearing. Mark Butler, 1640 Washam Road, states that the landscaping in Countryside is beautiful and he believes that the Yorgason's do a great job with their developments. Dave Yorgason, 6200 N Meeker PI, Boise, Idaho, Capital Development, speaks on behalf of this development and answers questions regarding existing trees on this site. Murray closes public hearing. Discussion. Murray moves to approve DR-39-02 - Common Area Landscaping within Timberland Estates Subdivision with the site specific and standard conditions of approval set forth in the staff report with the following amendments to site specific conditions: Site specific condition #7 shall be amended to include all engineering and arborist fees incurred with this project. Site specific conditions #10 shall read as follows: The Design Review Board, after review of the arborist report, identifies the following trees can be removed from this subdivision without penalty, trees #10,11,12,13, and 26. Site specific condition #11 shall read as follows: The applicant shall review the condition of tree #4, identified in the arborist report as a 38 inch Elm, but a 40 inch caliper tree on the landscape plan, for evaluation and retention. Should it be determined that the arborist report is followed in that the tree is to be removed, the applicant shall be required to provide a revised landscape plan submitted to staff and reviewed by one member of the Design Review Board prior to issuance of a building permit. If the tree is to be removed, additional landscaping making up the berm will suffice as compensation for this removal. Site specific condition #12 shall read as follows: The applicant is required to provide thinning of the existing trees within lot 2, block 1 and lot 4, block 3. Page 10 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc Thinning shall be done by an arborist or licensed tree surgeon and shall be done prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for that particular lot. The existing trees that remain along the perimeter of the property can be retained as identified in the landscaping plan without additional tree thinning activity. Seconded by McCullough. Discussion. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. G. DR-40-02 - Monument Si2n for Timberland Estates Subdivision - Capital Development LLC: Capital Development LLC, represented by David Koga with The Land Group, is requesting design review approval of a monument sign for Timberland Estates Subdivision. The site is located on the north side of State Highway 44 approximately lA-mile west of Ballantyne Road at 2800 West State Street. Barnes moves to approve DR-40-02 - Monument Sign for Timberland Estates Subdivision with the site specific and standard conditions of approval as set forth in the staff report. Seconded by Paulson. Barnes amends the motion to add site specific condition #4 as follows: A site landscape plan be submitted showing the boulders as noted in the drawing to be included with the sign. This can be reviewed by staff. Second concurs. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. H. DR-41-02 - Monument Si2ns and Directional Sim for Old Town Square - Old Town I. LLC: Old Town I, LLC, represented by Mark Butler, is requesting design review approval to construct two monument signs and one directional sign for Old Town Square. The site is located on the northeast corner of State Street and 2nd Street at 222 - 360 East State Street. Mark Butler, 52 N Second St. is the applicant and reviews the project. Staff reviews the application. Discussion. Murray opens public hearing. Murray closes public hearing. Discussion. Murray moves to approve DR-41-02 - Monument Signs and Directional Sign for Old Town Square with the site specific and standard conditions of approval set forth in the staff report with the following amendments to the site specific conditions: Site specific condition #1 shall read as follows: The existing dirt area at the base of the perimeter wall shall be landscaped to provide as much compliance with Eagle City Code as allowed. The Design Review Board supports the quantity of landscaping below the wall as meeting Eagle City Code. Site specific condition #2 shall be stricken and rewritten as follows: The Design Review Board supports the construction and placement of the second monument sign as proposed by the applicant which meets Eagle City Code 8-2A-2(a)(3) by improving the design guidelines downtown development and allowing flexibility for the applicant for this unique property configuration. Site specific condition #5 shall read as follows: The Design Review Board supports Page 11 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc the temporary relocation of the existing City Hall monument sign to the east side of the driveway. Seconded by McCullough. Discussion. Murray amends the motion to add site specific condition #6 as follows: The Design Review Board supports the installation of a pole mounted sign on the existing light poles as presented with this application. Second concurs. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. NEW BUSINESS: 6. A. Merrill would like to add for discussion the berm at Castlebury Subdivision. Dave Yorgason explains the problem of the berm slope to the Board. The Design Review Board recommends an action to support the currently existing 2:1 slope at Castlebury Subdivison on the back side of the berm due to DEQ requirements. The Design Review Board also supports the idea of installing a non- mowed fescue blend on the back side of the berm in order to avoid future maintenance problems. The back side of the berm with the fescue blend shall also be maintained with underground irrigation as originally proposed. Roll call of all members of the Design Review Board. All aye, recommended by all Board members, grass shall be installed by the homeowner. B. Homeowner that would like trees removed from OK Park. Murray recommends that trees should not be removed and should be left in the City park. Seconded by Paulson. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. C. Tree in Heritage Park, safety of tree and if tree should be trimmed. The Board would recommend that Terrys Tree Service be contacted to take a look at this tree and trim when necessary. 7. REPORTS: A. Design Review Board Members: B. Council Liaison: C. Staff: 8. ADJOURNMENT: McCullough moves to adjourn at 11:45. Seconded by Stanger. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. Page 12 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: ~~._~~ SHARÒN K. MOORE CITY CLERKITREASURER JAMES G. CHAIRMAN AY ."""""" .........., OF 1:-4 ""'#. !l.J." ,-;:.. ;......... 0,( ~, ¡ v.... ~YOR-11'5 ' : . ~o ~ . "' v : * : -.- * : : '"' ...! \ ~;'r-.)EAL$ : .. .r.. .~() :Q 0 ~ -:. v-~ to. ,'" ...~ ..~ . .,..,. ",'OR""'. .. """'" -1), "'.u.... ~ ....' ###, /] OF \~ ",.." ",............, A TRANSCRIBABLE RECORD OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. Page 13 of 13 K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\DR-O7-11-02min.doc