Minutes - 2001 - Design Review - 04/12/2001 - Regular
ORtGINAL
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES
April 12, 2001
The Design Review Board met in regular session on April 12, 2001. Chairman Murray
presiding.
1.
CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL: The following members were present: MURRAY, MC
CULLOUGH, KENISON. COUNCIL LIAISON MERRILL, BARNES - Absent. A
quorum is present.
3.
CONSENT AGENDA.
. Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Design
Review Board member, City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed
from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent
Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the
Rules of Order.
. Any item on the Consent Agenda that contains written recommendations from
the City of Eagle shall be adopted as part of the Design Review's Consent
Agenda approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Minutes of December 14, 2000.
B. Minutes of March 8, 2001.
Removed from the consent agenda.
C. DR-13-01- Buildine Wall Sien for Wells Fareo Bank - Wells Fareo
Bank: Wells Fargo Bank, represented by Craig Cosper with Young Electric Sign
Company, is requesting design review approval to remove the existing First
Security Bank signs and to construct a building wall sign for Wells Fargo Bank.
The site is located on the north side of Plaza Drive within Eagle Plaza Shopping
Center approximately 200-feet east of Eagle Road at 108 East Plaza Drive. This
item was continued from the March 8, 2001 meeting.
Murray inquires if the applicant, Craig Cosper, agrees with the conditions in the
staff report. The applicant has no objections. No one from the audience chooses
to speak.
D. DR-14-01- Two Buildine Wall Siens for Eaele Sewer District - Eaele
Sewer District: Eagle Sewer District, represented by Debbie Anderson with Idaho
Electric Signs, is requesting design review approval to construct two building wall
signs for Eagle Sewer District. The site is located on the northeast corner of
Palmetto Avenue and State Street at 44 North Palmetto Avenue.
Page 1 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\200 1 \DR-04-12-0 1 min.doc
Murray inquires if the applicant, Debbie Anderson, agrees with the conditions in
the staff report. The applicant has no objections. No one from the audience
chooses to speak.
Kenison moves to add item 6A to the Consent Agenda. Seconded by
McCullough.
6A. DR-37-99 MOD - Modification to the Research and Development Office
Buildine within Rocky Mountain Business Park - Steed Construction: Steed
Construction, represented by Wes Steele with Habitec Architects, is requesting
design review approval to modify the building elevations of the Steed Building.
The site is located on the north side of East Iron Eagle Dri ve within Rocky
Mountain Business Park, approximately 750-feet west of Edgewood Lane at 1250
East Iron Eagle Drive.
Barnes arrives at 6:04 p.m.
McCullough moves to approve the consent agenda as amended. Seconded by
Kenison. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. DR-68-00 - Common Area Landscapine for Banbury Meadows Subdivision No.
5 - Banbury Meadows LLC: Banbury Meadows LLC, represented by Dick Phillips, is
requesting design review approval of the landscaping within the common area of Banbury
Meadows Subdivision No.5. The site is located on the east and west sides of Locust
Grove Road extended approximately Y2 mile north of Chinden Boulevard. This item was
continued from the March 8,2001 meeting.
Murray introduces the item and notes the applicant has requested this item be continued
to the May 12,2001 Design Review Board meeting.
McCullough moves to continue DR-68-00 to the May 10, 2001 Design Review Board
meeting. Seconded by Anderson. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
Discussion of the March 8,2001 minutes.
Kenison moves to approve the March 8, 2001 minutes as amended. Seconded by
Barnes. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
B. DR-6-01 - Common Area Landscapine for Eaele Towne and Country includine
the Win Co Buildine - Eaele Development Associates: Eagle Development Associates,
represented by Jeff Huber, is requesting design review approval of the common area
landscaping within Eagle Towne and Country Centre and approval of a 99,000-square
foot building which includes WinCo Foods. The site is located on the north side of State
Street between Highway 55 and Horseshoe Bend Road at 3182 East State Street. This
item was continued from the March 8,2001 meeting.
Murray introduces the item.
Jeff Huber, 416 S. 8th Street Boise, Idaho. Mr. Huber reviews items discussed at the
previous meeting and submits a letter for the Board to review. Louie Horsemeir with
BRS Architects reviews the revised architectural elements for this application. Bob
Page 2 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\2001 \DR-04-12-0 1 min.doc
Drole, Landscape Architect, reviews the changes made to the landscaping plan.
Discussion amongst the Board.
Murray moves to approve DR-6-01 Common Area Landscaping for Eagle Towne
and Country including the Win Co Building with the site specific and standard
conditions of approval set forth in the staff report originally prepared for the March
9, 2001 Design Review Board meeting, with the following modifications:
. Site specific condition #2: Shall be deleted and replaced as follows. Building
pad #10 shall be orientated to align in a parallel condition, with its long
dimension being to the centerline of Horseshoe Bend Road. All other pads
within phase one and the gas pad of phase 2 shall be permitted in the orientation
shown on the applicants plan.
. Site specific condition #7: Add the following sentence. The Design Review
Board recognizes the addition of the masonry wall screening along the north side
of major C (Win Co) and accepts the design as meeting this intent for screening.
. Site specific condition #11: The landscape screening and design as presented
in the revised package dated by the City on March 20, 2001 meets the Design
Review Board's acceptance for landscaping and screening of the WinCo
building and parcels along the east side of Horseshoe Bend Road.
. Site specific condition #12: The completion of the wetlands and landscaping
shall be done on a phased basis with the complete installation of the wetlands
area and landscaping to be done prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for major C.
. Site specific condition #13: This condition shall be done with staff and one
member of the Design Review Board at the time the parking lot and building
lighting is designed and reviewed by the engineer.
. Site specific condition#14 shall be re-written as follows: The applicant shall
be required to provide a 5' minimum berm from the curb side of the
development regardless of its relationship to the center line of Horseshoe Bend
Road. The intent of this condition is to maintain the 5' landscape separation of
the parking lot to the right-of-way area on Horseshoe Bend Road.
. Site specific condition #16: Shall be replaced as follows: The design proposed
with the stone landscaping and water feature meets the approval of the Design
Review Board as an entry statement for the City of Eagle.
. Site specific condition #17 shall be re-written as follows: The revised
landscape plan as presented and dated March 30, 2001 with this revised
application meets the intent of the Eagle Design Review Board for site
landscaping. The Design Review Board requests staff to identify, for their
benefit only, the requirements with respect to tree caliper required with respect
to replacements inches with respect to installed and designed inches.
. Site specific condition #19: This requirement is not necessary where trash
Page 3 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\200 1 \DR -04-12-01 min.doc
enclosures are provided through masonry wall screening.
. Site specific condition #22 shall be re-written as follows: The applicant has
indicated their desire to provide internally illuminated signage for the Win Co
building. The Design Review Board discourages the placement of pole mounted
lighting to directly light the face of this building, and requests the pole mounted
lights designed to light the walls be removed from the project.
. No franchise or corporate style architecture will be allowed on any pad
within this development.
. The Design Review Board encourages the applicant to terminate the
landscaping at each phase as follows: Phase 1 landscaping to terminate on the
north side of new east/west drive aisle. Phase 2 will terminate on the west side of
the main north/south drive aisle and include the wetlands installation.
. The Design Review Board recognizes the efforts that major C has made with
respect to the rear elevation of its building and would encourage the same
response from majors A and B at time of submittal to the Eagle Design Review
Board.
. The Design Review Board will provide additional information to the
landscape architect with respect to a workshop that would occur at some point
prior to the issuance of a building permit. Those comments will be sent to the
applicant by City staff within 7 days of the City Council approval.
Seconded by McCullough. Kenison would like the motion amended #22: to change
the word recommend to require (the removal of the pole mounted lighting to
illuminate the walls of the building). Murray so amends his motion. Second
concurs with the amendment. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
5. PUBLIC HEARING:
A. DR-65-00- Bank Facility with Drive-up Service for A TM Machine Only - Key
Bank: Key Bank, represented by Roger Foster with BRS Architects, is requesting design
review approval to construct a 5,300-square foot bank facility with a drive-up service (for
ATM machine only). The site is located on the north side of Chinden Boulevard
approximately 300-feet east of Eagle Road within the Eagle Country Plaza Shopping
Center at 3314 East Chinden Boulevard.
Murray introduces the item.
Roger Foster, BRS Architects, 1010 Allante Boise, Idaho.
application.
Cerda reviews the staff report.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Mr. Foster briefly reviews the
Discussion amongst the Board.
McCullough moves to approve DR-65-00 Bank Facility with Drive-up Service for
Page 4 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\200 1 \DR-04-12-0 1 min.doc
A TM Machine Only with the site specific and standard conditions of approval.
Adding the following:
. Site specific condition #8: The Design Review Board would encourage that no
additional site lighting be added to this pad. The existing lights should be
adjusted to fit new building pad site.
Seconded by Barnes. Discussion. Murray request the motion be amended to
address building mounted lighting. McCullough amend his motion to add: All
building mounted lighting shall follow the design of the lighting that has been
established on the building known as Eagle Market Place. Second concurs to the
amendment. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
B. DR-15-01- Flex Space Buildine within Rocky Mountain Business Park - Eaele
Land LLC: Eagle Land LLC, represented by Mike Fairchild, is requesting design review
approval to construct a 13,511-square foot flex space building. The site is located
approximately 200-feet east of Plaza Drive and approximately 200-feet north of Iron
Eagle Drive within the Rocky Mountain Business Park at 1117 East Plaza Drive.
Murray introduces the item.
Mike Fairchild, representing Eagle Land LLc. Mr. Fairchild reviews the architecture for
this application. Phil Hull with The Land Group, 128 S. Eagle Rd. Eagle, Id. Hull
reviews the site landscape plan.
Cerda reviews the staff report.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Board. Phil Hull addresses access to the property.
Murray moves to continue DR-15-01 Flex Space Building within Rocky Mountain
Business Park with the following requests of the applicant:
. The applicant shall provide the Design Review Board with a lighting plan that
either represents self supporting lighting design or the shared use of adjacent
property owners and that be identified in the lighting plan.
. The applicant shall be required to incorporate the functional paving necessary
for this application to stand-alone.
. With regards to the north side of the property, the Design Review Board
recognizes the need to have cross access agreements to the south.
. The applicant shall be required to indicate mechanical equipment and screening
types on the north corner of the building and a revised landscape plan shall be
provided.
. The applicant shall be required to revise the western landscape area to
incorporate two additional feet of landscaping with a 17' stall or a 19' stall to
bring them into compliance with Eagle City Code for parking design.
Page 5 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\2001 \DR-Q4-12-0l min. doc
. Should the applicant use the previously approved design review application with
respect to the former Merrill Egg Farm as part of this design, the applicant shall
incorporate that information onto this site plan and indicate the standard of
improvement to be done as part of this application.
Seconded by Kenison. Discussion. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
C. DR-16-01- Interior Parkine Lot. Landscapine and Liehtine within Trolley
SQuare Shoppine Center - Coulter Properties LLC: Coulter Properties LLC,
represented by Tom Bauwens with Dakota Company, Inc., is requesting design review
approval of the interior parking lot landscaping and lighting within Trolley Square
Shopping Center. The site is located north of State Street and approximately 200-feet
west of Academy Way within Trolley Square Shopping Center.
Murray introduces the item.
Larry Dirkham 380 Parkcenter Blvd. Boise, Idaho. Mr. Dirkham reviews the application,
and notes that they received final approval from ACHD last night. Doug Russell with
The Land Group, 128 S. Eagle Rd. Eagle, Idaho. Mr. Russell reviews the landscape plan.
Discussion between Board, Mr. Dirkham and Mr. Russell.
Cerda reviews the staff report.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Mr. Dirkham comments on a cross easement which is associated with the conditional use
permit for this project.
Discussion amongst the Board.
Murray moves to approve DR-16-01 Interior Parking Lot, Landscaping and
Lighting within Trolley Square Shopping Center with the site specific and standard
conditions of approval set forth in the staff report, with the following amendments
to the site specific conditions of approval.
. Site specific condition #5: Staff shall provide the applicant an opportunity to sit
down and discuss where the landscape plan is out of compliance with respect to
the interior landscape areas.
. Site specific condition #6: The last sentence shall read: The proposed materials
shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of
a building permit for individual or group of tenants or pads.
. Site specific condition#7: is deleted.
. Site specific condition#8: The last sentence shall read: The revised lighting
details and design plans shall be reviewed by staff and the Design Review Board
at the first design review application for one of the pads with tenants.
. Site specific condition#10: Add the following sentence: The applicant is
encouraged to seek an alternative lighting fixture (which staff has catalogue cuts
for) that better represent an optic displacement of full downward lighting.
Page 6 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\2001 \DR-04-12-0 lmin.doc
. Site specific condition#l1: The revised lighting detail shall be reviewed by staff
and the Design Review Board at the time of the first tenant application.
. Site specific condition#13: The lighting information provided meets the Design
Review Boards criteria with the condition that the lighting lens be designed as a
flat lens. The applicant shall provide a directive as to the pole and bracket arm
color.
Seconded by McCullough. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
Murray calls a 5-minute recess.
D. DR-17-01- Dance Studio and Office Buildine within Rocky Mountain Business
Park - Carol Tone: Carol Tong, represented by Mark Butler with Land Consultants Inc.,
is requesting design review approval to construct a 5,700-square foot dance studio and
office building. The site is located approximately 200-feet south of Iron Eagle Drive
within the Rocky Mountain Business Park at 500 South Fitness Place.
Murray introduces the item.
Mark Butler, 222 E. State Street Eagle, Idaho. Mr. Butler reviews the application. Phil
Hull reviews the landscape plan. Butler discusses the site plan. Steven Green 4008
Edgemont Boise, Idaho. Mr. Green reviews the architecture of the building.
Cerda reviews the staff report.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Butler comments on site lighting.
Discussion amongst the Board.
Council member Merrill arrives at 9:25 p.m.
Kenison moves to continue DR-17-01 Dance Studio and Office Building within
Rocky Mountain Business Park Motion to the next regularly scheduled meeting.
And ask that the applicant re-submit a site design plan with 2 light bollards and also
a building design that has more historic characteristic as addressed in City Code, or
does something to relieve the monotony of the west elevation in particular. Re-
submit the building design to address the building monotony of the flat planes on
the building. Seconded by Barnes. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES
E. DR-18-01- Common Area Landscapine within Brookwood Subdivision Phase 4
includine a pool. restroom facilities. and tot lot - Aries Development LLC: Aries
Development LLC, represented by Phil Hull with The Land Group, is requesting design
review approval of the common area landscaping within Brookwood Subdivision Phase 4
including a pool, restroom facilities, and tot lot. The site is located approximately 1,905-
feet east of Eagle Road within Brookwood Subdivision.
Murray introduces the item.
Phil Hull with The Land Group, 128 S. Eagle Rd. Eagle, Idaho. Hull reviews the
Page 7 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\200 1 \DR -04-12-01 min.doc
application.
Cerda makes herself available to answer any questions.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Board.
McCullough moves to approve DR-18-01 Common Area Landscaping within
Brookwood Subdivision Phase 4 including a pool, restroom facilities, and tot lot
with the site specific and standard conditions of approval with the following
changes. Adding the following language:
. Site specific condition #2: The 2" caliper trees shall be carried out on Shady
Park Lane as well.
Seconded by Kenison. Discussion. McCullough amends his motion:
. Site specific condition #4 shall read: The applicant has indicated that the site will
be used only from sun up to sundown and will require no site lighting thus no
site lighting is proposed or approved.
Second concurs. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
F. DR-19-01 - Professional Medical Office Buildine within Rocky Mountain
Business Park - Brock and Diane McConnehey: Brock and Diane McConnehey,
represented by Heartland Construction, is requesting design review approval to construct
a 12,400-square foot professional medical office building. The site is located on the
southwest corner of Plaza Drive and Iron Eagle Drive within Rocky Mountain Business
Park at 951 East Plaza Drive.
Murray introduces the item.
Walt Lindgren with Johnson Architects. Mr. Lindgren reviews the application. Phil Hull
with The Land Group, reviews the landscape plan for the site. Discussion.
Cerda reviews the staff report.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Board.
Murray moves to approve DR-19-01 Professional Medical Office Building within
Rocky Mountain Business Park with the site specific and standard conditions with
the following changes.
. Site specific condition #5 read: The applicant shall be required to provide a
revised landscape plan showing the location of the existing street trees along
Plaza Drive and Iron Eagle Drive and the addition of any trees to provide a
miRiRHIm maximum of 35-feet of separation between trees along Plaza Drive and
Iron Eagle Drive. The revised landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved
by staff and one member of the Design Review Board prior to issuance of a
Page 8 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\2001 \DR-04-12-01 min. doc
building permit.
. Site specific condition #6: is deleted.
. Site specific condition #8: shall be rewritten as follows. The applicant shall be
required to provide a site and parking lot lighting plan showing location, height
and wattage. The site and parking lot lighting shall be reviewed by staff and one
member of the Design Review Board prior to issuance of a building permit. If
the historic fixture is intended to be used the applicant is encouraged to provide
a shielded fixture with this project. The specific equipment is available from
staff.
. Site specific condition#10: The applicant shall comply with the 20' setbacks per
the staff report, verification shall be made prior to issuance of a building permit.
. Site specific condition #11: The applicant is encouraged to stripe and identify the
fourteen parking spaces within their property on the northwest side of the
development as reserved for the medical office use. The Design Review Board
recognizes this as a policing issue between neighboring businesses and hopes the
signage will be sufficient.
Seconded by McCullough. Discussion. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
G. DR-20-01 - Business and Professional Office Buildine Within Rocky Mountain
Business Park - Tom and Karen Sellin: Tom and Karen Sellin, represented by
Heartland Construction, are requesting design review approval to construct a 12,178-
square foot business and professional office building. The site is located on the north side
of Iron Eagle Drive approximately 250-feet east of Plaza Drive within Rocky Mountain
Business Park at 1036 East Iron Eagle Drive.
Murray introduces the item.
Megan Wymer 8864 Mediterranean Ct. representing Tom and Karen Sellin reviews the
application. George Transtrom addresses the trellis and parking lot lighting. Phil Hull
with The Land Group addresses the landscape plan.
Cerda reviews the staff report.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Board.
Murray moves to approve DR-20-01 Business and Professional Office Building
Within Rocky Mountain Business Park with the site specific and standard
conditions of approval with the following modifications:
. Site specific condition #4 shall be re-written: The Design Review Board
recognizes the mixture of plant material provided along the perimeter fence as
being installed as part of the Pacific Heights Subdivision and recognizes the
design meets the buffering and mixture requirements of Eagle City Code.
.
Site specific condition #6 add the following: Should the development to the north
Page 9 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\200 1 \DR-04-12-0 1 min.doc
revise the parking lot layout, this terminus island would no longer exist and an
additional shade tree is not required.
. Site specific condition #14: The applicant has indicated the requirement by the
development to limit the parking lot lighting to historic fixtures. The Design
Review Board recommends that an alternate historic fixture be used which
would provide a more downward flow onto the parking lot. City staff can
provide more detailed information on the alternate fixture.
. Site specific condition #16: Site plan shall be revised to accommodate eight
compact parking spaces along the northern edge of this development, in doing so
an additional 2' of landscaping would be added to the common landscaping
between the Fire Departments property and the applicant's property. That
change shall be reviewed by staff and one member of the Design Review Board.
. The applicant has indicated that the roof drainage for the building would be
handled through a system of perimeter gutters with chain down spouts. This
would be consistent with other applicants in this business park.
Seconded by McCullough. ALL AYE.. .MOTION CARRIES.
H. DR-21-01- Dentist Office Buildine - Brenden Clements: Brenden Clements,
represented by James Gipson, is requesting design review approval to construct a 5,000-
square foot dental office building. The site is located on the southwest corner of Eagle
Road and Floating Feather Road at 1177 North Eagle Road.
Murray introduces the item.
This item will be heard at a later date.
I. DR-22-01 - Research and Development Office Buildine within Rocky Mountain
Business Park- Steed Construction: Steed Construction, represented by Wes Steele
with Habitec Architects, is requesting design review approval to construct a 21,744-
square foot research and development office building. The site is located on the north site
of Iron Eagle Drive approximately 550-feet west of Edgewood Lane within the Rocky
Mountain Business Park at 1396 East Iron Eagle Drive.
Murray introduces the item.
Wes Steele 1250 E. Iron Eagle Drive Eagle, Idaho reviews the application.
Cerda makes herself available for questions.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Board.
Barnes moves to continue DR-22-0l Research and Development Office Building within
Rocky Mountain Business Park with changes in the site specific conditions of approval.
Site specific condition #5 shall be changed: The applicant shall be required to provide
additional elevations of the building, specifically the rear elevation showing more relief
and raising a portion of the roof to eliminate the straight plane. Site specific condition
Page 10 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\2001 \DR-04-12-0 1 min.doc
#6: The applicant shall be required to provide a revised landscape plan showing a
different mixture of texture and more suitable plantings. This can either be accomplished
by a workshop set up with the landscape architect from Design Review or brought back to
the full Board. Seconded by Kenison. Discussion.
Barnes withdraws her motion.
Murray moves to approve DR-22-01 Research and Development Office Building
within Rocky Mountain Business Park with site specific and standard conditions of
approval set forth in the staff report with the following modifications.
. Site specific condition#6: The applicant shall provide a revised landscape plan
showing additional texture, color, heartiness, and material selections that have
been designed by a person knowledgeable in the landscape profession. The
landscape plan shall be reviewed by staff and one member of the Design Review
Board prior to building permit issuance.
. Site specific condition #7 shall have the following revision to the last sentence:
The site and parking lot lighting shall be reviewed and approved by staff and
one member of the Design Review Board prior to issuance of a building permit.
. Site specific condition #10: The applicant is required to provide additional
horizontal and vertical relief on the rear (north) elevation of the building, with
respect to the tilt-out concrete panels. The applicant is encouraged to provide
compact parking spaces to allow no loss in parking with the additional foot print
encroachment.
Seconded by McCullough. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
6. NEW BUSINESS:
A. DR-37-99 MOD - Modification to the Research and Development Office
Buildine within Rocky Mountain Business Park - Steed Construction: Steed
Construction, represented by Wes Steele with Habitec Architects, is requesting design
review approval to modify the building elevations of the Steed Building. The site is
located on the north side of East Iron Eagle Drive within Rocky Mountain Business Park,
approximately 750-feet west of Edgewood Lane at 1250 East Iron Eagle Drive.
Moved to the Consent Agenda.
7. REPORTS:
A. Design Review Board Members: Kenison has concerns with staff providing input
on applications that are received. Feels that staff should be more of a technical role
and not comment on the aesthetics of the applications, that is the function of the
Board. McCullough states that it was actually the goal of the Board to weed out
the applications that had made no effort to comply with Eagle City Code.
Discussion.
B. Council Liaison: Council member Merrill notes that a new Design Review Board
member was confirmed tonight and should be attending the May meeting.
C. Staff: None
Page 11 of 13
K\DESCREV\MINUTES\200 1 \DR-04-12-0 1 min.doc
8. ADJOURNMENT: McCullough moves to adjourned at 11:35 p.m. Seconded by
Barnes. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
Page 12 of 13
K:\DESCREV\MINUTES\2001 \DR-04-12-0 lmin.doc
SHAR N K. MOORE
CITY CLERK/TREAS URER
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
A TRANSCRIBABLE RECORD OF THIS MEETING IS A V AILABLE AT CITY
HALL.
Page 13 of 13
K\DESCREV\MINUTES\200 1 \DR-Q4-12-0 1 min.doc
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN•IN SHEET
SUBJECT: DR-18-01 — COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING WITHIN BROOKWOD
SUBDIVISION PHASE 4 INCLUDING A POOL, RESTROOM FACILITIES, AND TOT
LOT — ARIES DEVELOPMENT LLC
APRIL 12, 2001 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
Document2
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
SUBJECT: DR-19-01- PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING WITHING
ROCKY MOUNTAIN BUSINESS PARK — BROCK AND DIANE MCCONNEHEY
APRIL 12, 2001 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
Document2
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
SUBJECT: DR-20.OI- BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING
WITHING ROCKY MOUNTAIN BUSINESS PARK - TOM & KAREN SELLIN
APRIL 12, 2001 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO9 CON9
Page 1 of 1
Document2
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
SUBJECT: DR-21-01- DENTIST OFFICE BUILDING - BRENDEN CLEMENTS
APRIL 12, 2001 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
Document2
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
SUBJECT: DR-22-O I - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICE BUILDING
WITHIN ROCKY MOUNTAIN BUSINESS PARK - STEED CONTRUCTION
APRIL 12, 2001 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
•
Page 1 of 1
Document2
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN•IN SHEET
SUBJECT: DR-65.00 - FACILITY WITH DRIVE-UP SERVICE
FOR ATM MACHINE ONLY - KEY BANK
APRIL 12, 2001 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
Document2
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
SUBJECT: DR-it 5-01 - FLEX SPACE WITHIN ROCKY MOUNTAIN BUSINESS PARK
EALGE LAND LLC
APRIL 12, 2001 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
Document2
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
SUBJECT DRM 1 6-0 1 — INTERIOR PARKING LOT,LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
WITHIN TOLLEY SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER — COUTLER PROPERTIES LLC
APRIL 12, 2001 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
Document2
EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
SUBJECT: DR-I 7-01 - DANCE STUDIO AND OFFICE SPACE WITHIN TROLLEY
SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER - CAROL TONG
APRIL 12, 200 I 6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
Document2
FROM :RWD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FAX NO. :3604592063 Feb. 09 2000 09.23AM P1
Apr- 09 01 09:02e Deism Community Fo
Post-lt'Fax Note 7671 °s• ..' n�,a�os►3
irfAziriwzarimamism
comet. Co.
/PMKZIEMI Phone
Fsx
AAprilS,2001 ,'riff f
Robert W.Droll
4405 7th Avenue SE,Suite 203
Lacey,WA 98503
Dear Mr.Droll:
I have completed my inspection of the trees at project number 00161.The following is my
assessment of those trees.
Group I
This is a mixture of trees,mainly willows and boxolders.The trees are in fair to good
condition and should be retained and protected during construction. The value of these
trees are 316,000.00.
Group 2
These trees are in good condition and could be transplanted to the natural area being built
for storm water. These trees have a value of 1600.00.
Group 3
These trees are in poor condition and of no value. They are well past maturity and in
hazardous condition. I would recommend removal.
Group 4
This grouping of Black Locust are infested with borers and in poor condition. There is no
value to these trees.I would recommend removal.
Group 5
These trees are in extremely poor condition and pose an immediate hazard. Their trunks
are rotting and crown mass is unsound. I would recommend removal. These trees have no
value.
FROM_s RWD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FAX NO. :3604592063 Feb. 09 2000 09:23AM P2
Apn.,O9 01 09: 02a Boise Community Forestry 222222222222222 P-3
Group 6
These trees are in good condition and all but one is of transplanting size.If the nursery
leaves these trees,I would recommend transplanting them somewhere else on the site. The
large Catalpa is too large to transplant,but may not be able to be saved due to it's close
location to existing buildings. The value of the Catalpa is S9,000.00.The value of the
remaining trees in this group is S11,383.00.
If you have any questions please contact me.
71c,ere ly, /
MOW b-
Jerry Stallamith/Certified Arborist
i-i
. „.__ ,..„,g,,H,„...„cr,,,,,!,...„..„....,...,,,,,,,,,p,....-„,„. . ..,
. .1
,________....„,_.._:::___ ..."..... ,.. ,t _
.VIV,•11 71 yettinAkeRf el ii6.%7171`11-64,t, I
III
. '•ii-‹ abou .„4_,, °Ht.
111
, t 1
A .
. ,„„,„ ,, •
A,„,,,
b L• . .
;\
\ 3 • ��" ,
LA77 iIn
, ;, o
•
's t
/ 1,
V\Ir ,,,., ,,
. ......\\Nil 'ik: . •
4/6/1) •:1',',.,.;+'‘,.,, ..S'
.C1-‘3" ) ' ' . i 1
439%::',•-',S,
•••-''•'''''' 11.• lif
. ..1 N ( (......
• • .
.,.,„...,\......3......... •ft.. iv
�' 1 x
J o
N ‘.1 t\
;6 1
.. \ 4
• : *4'. e_r- 4 I
•
til
C ', `' 1
Rs
eill
AH . 4_3 . ; („
ir Ia
M
w gW IlLI ,.\::,
, ,
1
Li)0-.)0 1
!it
WHITE-LEASURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
April 12,2001
Design Review Board Members
CITY OF EAGLE
RE: DR-6-01 -Eagle Towne& Country Centre
Dear Board Members:
At the March 8,2001 Design Review Board meeting the Board Members requested that the applicant
address fourteen(14)different issues for the continued hearing on April 12,2001. The applicant has
addressed eleven(11)of those issues and has the following comments regarding the remaining three
(3)issues:
1. Request: "The applicant will be required to rotate pads 10 and 11 to be
perpendicular with Horseshoe Bend Road in response to Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council conditions of approval."
•
Response: The applicant requests that the Board consider leaving the pad designs as shown.
The site design of the pads were carefully thought out and designed to offer the
highest and best utilization of the site. As currently designed the sites allow for
maximum amount of landscaping on east side adjacent to Horseshoe Bend Road,
and for optimum vehicle circulation. Moreover, the Board will have the
opportunity to again review both pads when they submit for specific approval.
2. Request: "The applicant shall provide revised lighting details to indicate the removal
of the secondary lights near the top of the pole future."
Response: The purpose of the secondary lights is to illuminate WinCo's signage on the
- front of the building as the City of Eagle's sign ordinance prohibits internally
illuminated signs.
3. Request: "The landscape architect is required to review the location of the non-sales
item trees at Eagle Nursery and provide a sketch of the location of all
existing trees that are not part of the retail venue. Those trees should be
determined in caliper size and species. At this point an arborist's report is
not required."
Response: The applicant has provided a sketch of the trees in question in and around Eagle
Nursery. The removal of those trees will result in the applicant having to replace
one hundred thirty-three (133) tree units. The October 24, 2000 tree survey
416 S.8th Street,Suite 200 • P.O.Box 1277 • Boise, Idaho 83701-1277 • Telephone(208)345-1842 • Fax(208)343-3143
Page Two
April 12,2001
Design Review Board Members
CITY OF EAGLE
indicated one thousand six hundred forty-eight(1,648)tree units to be removed.
The total tree units to be removed with the addition of the nursery trees is one
thousand seven hundred eighty-one(1,781). The applicant did have an arborist
visit the site and report on the conditions of the existing trees. The report
indicates that the trees in Groups III,IV and V are of no value and in fact pose
a hazard. These trees represent one thousand three hundred twenty-eight(1,328)
tree units that the applicant feels he should not be required to replace based on
the arborist report. Assuming the Board agrees with the applicant then the
applicant is actually planting three hundred forty-four (344) trees above and
beyond what is required by the City of Eagle's ordinance.
The applicant would also like to explain to the Board the applicant's reasons in designing the rear
elevation of the WinCo building. The applicant acknowledges the Board's desire to increase the
architectural aspects of the rear elevation of the WinCo store as it will be exposed to passing motorists
until the landscaping matures and the storage units to the north are constructed. The applicant feels he
has overdesigned this rear elevation to mitigate the Board's concerns. The applicant is not
contemplating the same degree of architecture for the two (2)additional major tenants to the west as
they are well off the corner and are shielded by the existing storage units.
Thank you for your consideration of these responses.
Sincerely,
Jeff Huber
Applicant's Representative
H:\SHAREVCH\EAGBOARD.WPD
C...)
RE VED & FILED
1 t
1; a„fa....2.4"/ 0 - 1:1 a i CITY OF EAGLE
2..
APR 1 0 2001
1;
Route to•
: g r
_. ..
__„ _ a..0 ._
,---
! y .I _: D j i _ 0 i
III ii
-•-•• (2.1.411t ..-
..• .„,,e/tio7vej._..2..e"'" --.------.----...----...
. --'"---
0 %
f.
O.
.. - --------. -
0/4".:( . ..„../.114.. - 01 .e 1 4 I 1 jeig...-
__________..
.;
• •,•,- -
).) fjJ&
222 E. State Street,Suite B
Eagle,Idaho 83616 Land Consultants Inc
Office-208.938.3812
Fax-208.939.7321 RECEIVED& FILED
Email mlbutler@micron.net CITY OF EAGLE
APR 12 1001
FaA)( File:
Route to:
To: Design Review Board From: Kris Turner
Fax 939-6827 Pages: 2 Including cover page
Phone: Date: 4/12/01
Re: Studio C CC: N/A
X Urgent ❑For Review ❑Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑Please Recycle
Please see the attached letter.
Thanks ,
Kris Tumer
Administrative/Planning Assistant
Land Consultants, Inc.
Land Consultants Inc.
222 E. State Street • Suite B • Eagle Idaho 83616 • Office 208.938.3812 • F 2OR 9 9.7321
CITY OF EAGLE D
Date: April 12,2001 APR . 2 2001
TO: City of Eagle File:
Attention:Design Review Board Route to:
310 E. State Street
Eagle,ID 83616
RE: Studio C
Dear Board Members,
I have a meeting conflict for tonight.
Ada County staff placed my Ada.County item on at the beginning of their Public Hearing agenda so I
can get back to Eagle As soon as possible to represent Item 5D on your agenda(DR 17-01 Dance
Studio and Office Building).
Please postpone this item until I arrive.
Thank you.
S. ,
k L.Butler
Page 1 of 1
C:My Docamer+aCPJ bs 2001\Stixfo C 01161\Sa,dio C DR le1.doc