Minutes - 2000 - Design Review - 04/20/2000 - Regular
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES
April 20, 2000
The Design Review Board met in regular session on April 20, 2000. Chairman Murray
presiding.
1.
CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL: The following members were present: MURRAY, MC
CULLOUGH, KENISON, ANDERSON, Council liaison MERRILL. Absent:
KAUFFMAN,. A quorum is present.
3.
CONSENT AGENDA.
. Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Design Review
Board member, City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the
Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be
placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the Rules of Order.
. Any item on the Consent Agenda that contains written recommendations from the
City of Eagle shall be adopted as part of the Design Review's Consent Agenda
approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Minutes of March 9, 2000.
B. DR-13-00 Two Buildine Wall Siens for Starbucks Coffee - Starbucks
Coffee: Starbucks Coffee, represented by Debbie Anderson with Idaho
Electric Signs, is requesting design review approval of two internally
illuminated building wall signs. The site is located within Eagle Plaza
Shopping Center at 228 East Plaza Drive.
Kenison moves to table the minutes of March 9, 2000 to the next agenda. Seconded
by McCullough. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
Murray asks if there is anyone present who wishes to speak regarding DR-13-00.
No one in the audience chooses to speak. Debbie Anderson representing Starbucks
Coffee has not objections to the staff report.
Kenison moves to approve the Consent Agenda. Seconded by McCullough. ALL
AYE.. .MOTION CARRIES
Murray moves item 7 A up on the agenda to be heard at this time.
7 A. Historical Preservation Commission Representative Geneva Trent wishes to address
the Design Review Board.
Geneva Trent with the Eagle Historical Commission states that a map is being generated
for the Boards review regarding historical structures currently existing in Eagle. She
states that the Council has requested that the Commission review and provide suggested
modifications to the current Design Review Ordinance, but asks for some guidance from
the Board as to areas in which they would like to have Historical Commission input.
4.
5.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Chairman Murray announced it is the time and the place for the Public Hearing.
A. DR-12-00 - Retail Buildin~ within Eaele Pavilion Shoppin~ Center - Eaele
Pavilion LLC: Eagle Pavilion LLC, represented by Cricket Langworthy with BRS
Architects, is requesting design review approval to construct a 2,900-square foot retail
building. The site is located on the northeast corner of Eagle Road and State Highway
44, just south of the existing Pizza Hut building within Eagle Pavilion Shopping Center at
396 South Eagle Road.
Murray introduces the item.
Clint Minyoka with BRS Architects reviews the application. General discussion
regarding mechanical unit screening, landscaping and other architectural criteria.
Council liaison Merrill arrives at 6:20 p.m.
Cerda reviews the staff report.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Board.
Murray moves to approve DR-12-00 Retail Building within Eagle Pavilion Shopping
Center with the site specific and standard conditions of approval with the following
amendments to site specific conditions. Site specific condition #2 shall be deleted and
the plan submitted tonight shall be accepted. Adding the following site specific
condition: The applicant shall install an additional lattice trellis with Virginia
Creepers along the north face of the building at the west corner. The Design Review
Board accepts the applicant's recommendation to delete the window panel at the
southeast corner of the show. The applicant is encouraged to install gutters to allow
leader drops at the northeast and northwest corners of the building. Seconded by
McCullough. Discussion. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
B. DR-14-00 - Remodel Old Post Office Buildine into Office - US Timber Company:
US Timber Company, represented by Patrick McKeegan with McKeegan Architect, is
requesting design review approval to remodel the old post office building into an office
building. The site is located on the north side of State Street approximately 300-feet west
of Eagle Glen Lane at 222 West State Street.
Murray introduces the item.
Patrick McKeegan 419 S. 8th St. Ste. B Boise, Idaho representing US Timber Company
presents the application and comments on the staff report. Discussion of roofing
material, landscape elements and exterior lighting.
Cerda reviews the staff report. Discussion between staff and Board.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Mr. McKeegan states that any drainage problems will be addressed as they arise. Also
comments on the photos he submitted with his application and that his intent was to
demonstrate how well the remodeled building would fit into the surrounding area.
Discussion amongst the Board regarding window percentages, roof material and other
architectural criteria.
McCullough moves to approve DR-14-00 Remodel Old Post Office Building into
Office with the site specific and standard conditions of approval. Adding site
specific condition #5: The roof shall remain standing seam as originally proposed.
#6: The applicant shall provide one six foot bench to be installed in the front plaza
area. #7: The applicant shall provide Ivory Halo Dogwood plant material around
the condenser units located on the west side of the building. #8: Any drainage
problems on the site shall be addressed and solved prior to Certificate of
Occupancy. #9:The applicant shall be required to provide material samples to be
reviewed and approved by staff and one member of the Design Review Board prior
to issuance of a building permit. #10:The applicant shall provide chain drops for the
roof drainage. #11: The existing United States Post Office box and bollards shall be
removed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Seconded by Kenison.
Discussion. McCullough amends his motion to add site specific condition #12:All
existing or proposed site lighting shall be brought into compliance with Eagle City
Code prior to issuance of a building permit. Second agrees to the amendment. ALL
A YE...M OTI ON CARRIES.
C. DR-15-00 - Sewer District Office - Ea~le Sewer District: Eagle Sewer District,
represented by Michael Simmonds with ZGA Architects and Planners, is requesting
design review approval to construct a 3,500-square foot office building. The site is
located on the northeast comer of State Street and Palmetto Avenue at 812 East State
Street.
Murray introduces the item.
Tom Zabala representing Eagle Sewer District reviews the application. Chuck Fergusson
with the Eagle Sewer District provides clarification regarding the usage ofthe conference
room. General discussion.
Cerda has nothing to add but makes herself available to answer questions. Kenison
reviews the photographs of the animal clinic site that is near the proposed Sewer District
building. Discussion between staff and Board.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Board.
McCullough moves to approve DR-15-00 Sewer District Office with site specific and
standard conditions of approval with the following amendments. Adding site
specific condition #9: The existing curb cut on Palmetto Avenue shall be removed
and replaced to match the existing curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements.
#10:The applicant shall provide lawn edging between the lawn and planters.
#11 :The applicant shall install three inches of bark mulch within all planters on site.
#12:The roof drainage is to be internal as presented by the applicant. Seconded by
McCullough. Discussion. McCullough amends his motion to add site specific
condition #13:The proposed plaza area off the break room shall be submitted for
review and approval by staff and one member of the Design Review Board prior to
issuance of a building permit. Second agrees to the amendment. ALL
A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
D. DR-16-00 - Professional Office Buildim! - Daniel Bradshaw: Daniel Bradshaw is
requesting design review approval to construct a 29,967-square foot two story
professional office building. The site is located on the east side of Eagle Road
approximately 780-feet south of State Highway 44 (no address at this time).
Murray introduces the item.
Wes Steele 229 N. 9th St. Ste. 500 Boise, Idaho representing Mr. Bradshaw reviews the
application. Discussion between Mr. Steele and the Board.
Cerda and Council liaison Merrill address concerns expressed by the Board regarding
access to this site and ACHD criteria.
Murray opens the public hearing.
Murray closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Board regarding the choice of roof material, color selection,
landscaping, and access concerns.
Murray moves to continue DR-16-00 Professional Office Building, to a meeting date
within the next six months, with the recommendation that the following issues
regarding the site be addressed. 1: The site landscaping shall be reviewed in detail to
indicate adjacencies to the building and an increase of conifers species throughout
the site. 2. A revised site plan be provide to indicate roadways access from Eagle
Road in the event that the preliminary plat for Eagle River is not in place. 3.
Provide a cross section from Eagle Road to the west entrance of the building. 4.
Provide additional detail in regards to the building profile from base to roofline.
The Board recommends a roofing material of either slate or metal in lieu of the
asphalt shingles. 5. The elevations shall address window treatment in regards to
mullion and muntons. 6. The rock landscape feature and landscape lighting shall
be detailed or deleted. 7. References to the Eagle River Standards be provided to
the Design Review Board in current form (approved or not approved) 8. Material
(other than E.F.I.S.) and specifically color samples be provided to the Design Review
Board for review. The applicant is encouraged to selected richer colors than
provided in the elevations. Seconded by McCullough. ALL A YE...MOTION
CARRIES.
6. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Historical Preservation Commission Representative Geneva Trent wishes to address
the Design Review Board.
See above.
,- '-'~---,
7.
REPORTS:
A. Design Review Board Members: Kenison discusses his trip to Hiltonhead and
the type of signage allowed. He states that very little corporate architecture has
been allowed. Discussion.
B. Council Liaison: Discusses action regarding modifications to a landscaping
feature in Brookwood Subdivision. Also comments on Eagle Market Place and
their desire to remove the awnings from the building. Shows the size of sign that
Texaco was allowed to build and what they had been proposing to build.
C. Staff: Ask the Board for direction regarding Chinden Hardware's desire to
modify the existing sign. At this time the Board feels that the tenant either needs
to follow the master sign plan or submit an application to Design Review Board
for review. Murray would like to see on site aerial photographs that the applicant
could provide. Cerda notes that McDonalds will be bringing 2 internally
illuminated signs before the Board and also lists the remaining application that
will be brought before the Board next month.
8. ADJOURNMENT: Moved by McCullough and seconded by Kenison to adjourn.
ALL AYE.. ,MOTION CARRIES...
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: Æ# ó7it".' (). .'.
A ~ ",,".1"'" ~, ~
~~ ",' to", ""~~\
~ I. (:..ì.Z ~10lt4)ot>". '. '\
l:. ~ o)tJC 4>\ I
,. L--i- ~.. '.. '* Q .....- J* ~
SHAR{¡N K, MOORE . . \~, ~T1 ^ T 1::< ¡¡
CITY CLERK/TREASURER \ ";;'::.\.,t;'1":.n. -.:";?1./...l
~~~..:~-~~!;:., '~:' ~.(Bi'
'- .J.j i~ r'c>"' " ;~ "."'IJ'
"'" ....)..,: ..",.;'
.¡....,...>.:.",~~'i""
C'-~&.......
A TRANSCRIBABLE RECORD OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE AT CITY
HALL.
'-'--'-'----'--_.
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
S-'?- W~' ~~ ~ ~, i!:i!3 7r'L V
TOM~
~~IIDI\HO
~ f {f'\ dl J Vo..Af- _0_' t3~~ (:S .c¿~q-; ~ -(£
JXtt' 1 . f7f J n' {-
. I f I
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
Subject:DR-15-00 Sewer District Office
April 20, 2000
6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
Page 1 of 1
-- - ---, - --, --- - ------, -----
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
Subject:DR-14-00 Remodel of Old Post Office Buildin~ into Office
April 20, 2000
6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBL Y
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
NAME ADDRESS TELEPH 0 NE PRO? CON?
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
Subiect:DR-12-00 Retail Buildine within Eaele Pavillion Shoppine Center
April 20, 2000
6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
Page 1 of 1
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
Subiect:DR-16-00 Professional Office Buildjn{:
April 20, 2000
6:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBL Y
Page 1 of 1
-- -,--- --'-'~--
'------,--,,---_..
APR-12-00 WED 13:54 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P. 01.pgi6ow
F Patrick
MEKeegan
RECEIVED & FILED
Architects CITY OF EAGLE
APR 1 2 2000
File:
419 S.8th Street,Suite B Route to: /}
Boise, Idaho 83702-7157
208.424.8608 Fax 208.424.8609 - 'JP
www.mckeeganarch.com
•
April 12.2000
Barb Cerda
Planner II/Budding Inspector
Eagle City Planning Department
PO Box 477
Eagle,Idaho 83618
Re: U.S.Timber Design Review Application Report
Project No.
Dear Barbara.
I reviewed the site specific requirements with the owner and offer this response.
1. We still assert that the elevations submitted are more appropriate for an existing office building. As
you state in your response to item 4 concerning the setbacks,the Ordinance does not seem to
address use of wasting buildings. As stated In our application letter k does not appear that this
standard has been applied to other buildings recently constructed in the same zone. I will elaborate
at the hearing.
2. We will provide the decorative paving as requested to match the building across the street
3. Although not called out on the site plan submitted,all plant areas do have curbs or walks abutting
them.
4. Item 4 is acknowledged and agreed with. It is our understanding that this oversight in the Ordinance
will be corrected.
Also,please be advised that since we submitted the application we have decided to request that the roof
material be changed from the green metal to a 40 year heavy architectural asphalt shingle in the same
green tone. I will have samples and photos of the proposed material at the hearing.
We look forward to presenting our project to the board.
Sincerely,
Patrick McKeegan Architects
Re'l/ell
Patrick McKeegan
Principal Architect
APR-19-00 WED 11 :07 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424L.I.,f.01
RECEIVED & FILED
, . Patrick CITY OF EAGLE
MMSeegan
Architects APR 1 9 2000
File:
Rout.to:
419 S.8ei Street,Suite 8
Boise, Idaho 83702-7157
208.424.8608 Fax 208.424.8609
www.mckeeganarch.com
April 19,2000
Barb Cecda-Planner II
City,of Eagle
PO Box 477
Eagle, ID 83616
Re: U.S.Timber DR Application(Old USPO)
Project No. 200037
Dear Barb:
Since the hearing was postponed I took some time to evaluate buildings in Eagle that are similar to our
proposed use to determine if the 50%glazing requirement was being met.
My purpose is to give the Commission as much factual information so that U.S.limber is being evaluated
on the same basis as existing businesses.
I looked at similar building types that have been converted or newly constructed along State Street and
Eagle Roads. I photographed the buildings and measured the area of the vertical street frontage. The
window and door opening area was then measured and the percentage of opening
to wall calculated. Those photographs and calculations are attached. The measurements are in proportional
units.
As shown all of the converted and newly constructed buildings fall below the 50%ordinance requirement.
The average opening ratio is 26%. This is not surprising,generally a 25-35%ratio is recognized as being
aesthetically end structurally desirable for these types of buildings. Retail uses desire the higher ratio for
product visibility and the structural requirements to achieve the higher ratio are justifiable. In our case we
are asking that we be allowed to match the new building across the street(24 and 30%).
If you have any questions or need more information,please call.
Sincerely,
Patrick McKaegan Architects
ek McKellt-----
Principal Architect
cc: file
Attachments: Area Recap and photos.
' APR-19-00 WED 11 :07 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P. 02
•
Patrick
.1 McHeegaa
Architect
1 Window Area Recap _ 1
Building Window Area Percentage
Area_ (indudhj Doors) Window
1_ 227.50 60.50 26.60
2. 318.00 71.36 22.40
3. 190.00 64.00 33.60
4. 103.00 30.50 29.60
5. 287.50 37.50 13.04
6. 209.00 57.00 27.20
7. 224.00 67.68 30.20
8. 112.50 25.50 22.66
9. 213.00 49.75 23.40
10. 384.00 114.50 29.80
Average 25.85%
(419 S.8�St Ste.B.Boise,ID 83702 ama@mckeeganarch.com Ph:208-424-8608 Fax:208-424-88091
APR-19-00 WED 11 :08 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P. 03
s • -- , r ..: 1.
• " r` • .ice~ Bulking 227.50
_ ti".�`� '�i` .:�- Window 60.50
C:t*. Percentage 26.60%
U , .f.ri
•
¶e._—...'C t. ..r1b4 M ...3.yt.i:a r1••
, •,,, ,'+4,,, ST. a,...y ..
t.
♦ wG
*w
i
2 ; vi
• &•+;:"A: ,S' `! Pvt.t ll'if ni' •Building 318.00 ,� re ti �'*' — ;- ,-., ,
Window 71.36 a i' °" ,
Percentage 22.40% '-',It..' u ;, �. :r"
• L `c
IV A ill on
tl ye �i� .rti.E=1-
.• %.F04A
I i y -*+ • v�fay 'Qi(lY+i�'RC
► -
H
q
•ti,. e.r�{t
1 n n
{':'4.
.,....„.„,,,..:.,
„.c.,,,,....,„, .
..,:.„..,.„,.. ...:..:
,,e,.. 4 ii. .
3.
- � �, "
•
t Building 190.00
• _ 24. :•, t41'y Window 64.00
.nZ y� sr ,�T. Percentage 33.60%
41n _
• APR-19-00 WED 11 :09 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P. 04
. ,
• ,, .
T • 4 i
0 Nt, e •, .-4, • r. :!
- -v". ., 4-.1' - •
. ,t •,
-.... . i.•, . ik
. 1 . •• r
It.....t+ .at 01. Builing 103.00
ri-••. -.it .... Window 30.50
1,... ,....
IP .• • Z.1,1:- Percentage 29.60%
.fiEr-* -‘777,,,Ir ^ '•- - '
, 41, ..•, bozg :: Aiier-,p-444.
....-:, ... . .— -
i•
. vitsay.eiriNiimt ilt.k..,,, ....., ..4.4‘,...trkttaipgria•k;':.. "i.":.. •'..::;;Itcr-"1::..-C.:Lta5
:Y.).
.. ,.;...1..;C • ..: • .• •• t).,6.14.14.• y...'•••'..14 ;;•k;, 2,;•
•••-••, s..•-•,-zrtl'''' -••-v :t.:•".?•••ctp_t vi
• *•••'A ::>•*•...,''r," • •-...x.,.;
.• •,.. -.., ,-- }..... ..44...,•:.,114.,_
. ...40454•44:"A•••64. ' - • t • '' . .. . ,,•5.!..,.....4`". ..1%;1‘;:".:‘'fle.4' ..
•%. ......•1...;.a•'•• :
•-.N.A.Ag:-4,r1•••• ... 3
.....,:•.-..1u.v.:_... "
,.A. .A4Iii; •••• t.'.': . -.. e t C
St3C.:1.1.:.‘'''..'• 4
.410 il af•''': : - )
*.• 411$sr:2 417 -!, te, . i: - . ' ..,,,e. ., 4„ .
,7,,, ,, g, ir,.. . ,/, .,• ,.„----• ...,it
, _
1fit il'A 1 t d "Jr
. ,• -& li As , •t(
..; .... _,r, ,c • • . • ,., Jet, : . ...• • iPi." ,
4, 4"le 0 • - • ), %.• 4- jr
.,•• —.. •
. ••,,,
..- 0 •..s. t.: . , •-..
4,
w.i.. • ..r.0-44. . , „ae
-,t'in: fr-•
;$
5. fi, . ;
—
....., • .,
r• ;.„
. -
i f• •••I'V ..`4.
Budding 287.50 -f:ft.__ ,, • 'I •!' ,i. -,,r6,4_• ..„1,,,,.,?-.,-. Ilitk. 0;.„)n, t
• Window 37.50 . —• ' ‘, • .'".- „pr ....;-,,,,,,enec • -4.t.;,,,,%494•As 4-':-: 4,, 'I ' '''''• • ... ,,. l'-' ffl ' -tar ..:r-r",r3'..Percentage 13.04% , ..,),..,,•z_,.:.7 1, -. , ,-_e--t,._ ,-.-• - --,---i„,-._......,,-_,•. 4..t.......-', ,..,, ., •-.. .
. •.:!•........
._
. ......-..„..,ki..e1.71 -
;
-
...
_ • 44_
...
. „.-.1.**,'"uktIvis''' .s'-..0 - - .1 •.-...it.
• . .
•l'Yt:
•
'... . A
..i.'..
..."..., ".•,.. 1('C's .-‘3 '. tr*
. ' c ,..
• ' ' . • c.a,..'C'4A•P• .. , '
. ' . .
-,.0
6.
• ,ic)
. •? ..--,,,ie. ••-
.
• Building 209.00
Window 57.00
4• •
.. • . ...-. ' , i
" ..4t'' '‘..
••
. 1 Percentage 27.20%
4-•g,.,;,..,. ••,.::::„.. .
..-•••• •
. .t.... 1 0„ .• —,_ linili.
• • via--•• •' .-Aiestelirrifig —i'vrAz"tc.;,„',A,. , .-
• . ._ ,,„.,, •-.) r ..:,.. 04-..7.4,•••i r- ..-- • ' ....y
' , - , -..,..A.A.K.i. -.. ....,': :.
.•.0c.;,11,-trett,.-. . "..43..iF.fri,.. , :....•.2:‘ ...;,. ,.
APR-19-00 WED 11 :10 MCKEEGAH.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P. 05
•
•
PPS • �� 6 -�. 7.
'• Building 224.00
Window 67.68
1, �*xy `<•y• Percentage 30.20%
l
!V. %..r: ?
" Yid .:1'tCt-'"•-.• si..4 � ," $"3
'f,•Ya �. f.•s i,.1s-c T..••rs* • X 1M7Rr.+�'*`t'Sr"'+'•c' i-1 r�.\i
<.,--. ' -'- it.c. Mom.- _+Y ,'• -
..'."'. 'S ► ','.� t• . .
Building 112.50
indOW25.50 LyL. ,
Percentage 22.66%
•
.•i.k •.it f •V �T.•ti r
vt,
' r '�� S t•J�7,r.•�`n'.'{ 1t' - � !�i •,fib.
d. 4. ,. ' •
Ill«'b .. ~ `'`•4. ,
.? ' ,;
• ). • . y.:. -
AI
4 g.
J.
=; `: Building 213,00
• Window 49.75
4.:_ Percentage 23.40%
O LAIC � .� 'C� K=/ 4�' ¢.�, a"h,.
APR-19-00 WED 11 :11 MCKEEGAN. ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P. 06
'
. .. . •
i.e *. i• ) ‘
. • •
. . ... .
.„ .. ., . i. , .
. ...
.4. , \, . ..
....
• , ,,...
\....,, . _ .,,,,,.,....„. .. .,....,,,.
._.. _ ,,..."_ ,... • ... .,.. ,...:, . ,
, ,,. ,...„,..., . ...„....," ....„ T .V.P ." l'ar,V•PC, 4•....7/7"."-•
I __,......
__.
1 .
e ,...,...,...i., ...... .....• 40.• ••••"mg 0A11114)11- '‘'' t•••••. . 1.7r.••••••••........
...C." — t•1. .f.,Si....."?'-if N.. - '''..'.'''.'7 4"'-.4' ''"P"' " 4 ••••...
. •.. • -
-t4:4'*'.‘;•:'7f."r'''',At...% • '4'' 4C•I'li";'''7'.,1, -.4'3'-'- • -Ni• ,
, - .. ...i. • - A.:.-, -- •. ....., •.:.:: •••jo.„0:4,
- - - • •Irefiarx-1:-14gir.41"trezalz:1:`.2:-.A.nr43.2.-:...•..-.A.1--..t•-k•Flrolvc ••14,4, - ..• - ".3ix•-..:rtfEMWM3Saeol
• ' .',-..r1..- ..41•---7,-;,,,-tr. .?:•••z•:...b,
. . - ,.••.
• : ••:.1.. 143,:',...:11...-.,•;,,14. 7 "itk-.., - !,..w • • . . .- •,•
i -•-•• •-•?. ...r....•••-... ,• - tw....,"4.••••,,,;-.,..•• . • • • • •
,-
3:::.•' ..- ' :., : . . -- • - - .•, , „-c•-:-*4.1.7.k. . kt A,fs--*-'-,,e-1 4' • 33.; :,',. ... ...., . • ' ; --.'..1 •...•. ;4.
10. Builcing 384.00
Window 114.50
Percentage 29.80%
•
zg
Ia '4,< •
y■ I " n : sO p�umii�I��i��1
p � ¢� // I r N � ��
I oNI?!il 1
g sqy� i .millio�o�4.� si.A W y p
w n
II4r"
0•I p If ; '3, 1 . e
/ (== I. igl g 1
1 .-P' .1 1 0 4 i Ix itt I v j1111i v ,itgeitivw
i71:1111 11 1:11., 4101! V 8:: , , !I p g, . ,.
0 1 it Ela ig /44° 1; gi ii ; 11411 ; 1
8 0 ii
a B f Y
ill 194iii ,. -A g
;A 6
I? 41 Fi ' ., • !x
ii a lit
.� ~ E M P iw� � � i qE�
1i
i
: i
•
; 4
°
U
gg
4 "'� rn g g w
1.
NO ?
7pX- A
Z
Dig
wro ^ zL Ara
--Q Rs- > ma ♦♦��♦�♦• ♦� ♦ ►♦t♦ ♦♦♦♦ ►♦♦♦ ♦♦♦.
3 9 ' ' _ ' CC) :♦ ♦ .♦♦ ♦♦� ♦ram•♦♦��♦���♦♦♦♦��♦♦♦♦��r♦♦♦♦♦
$ s y_m ,P— ;♦'►i�i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i i�i�i♦i #f'r:#:♦:�#####:♦�'#:'i►:�4•4'r4•�i�:
i Q: s 9 III E o°g ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦
'1:4,-:- I i 6 ii; I r *
; 3 ° .cp at ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
. P 1E ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦�.♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦4
y 2 aa R to t �i♦i�i♦i♦i i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i♦i♦i♦i�i�i�i�i�i�i♦i�i♦i♦i�i�i�i♦i♦i♦i�i�i♦i♦i�i♦i�i�i♦i�i�i�i♦i�
l'It I 2- Ili 1
i
fill 1 iiiti#$ O
►,
;F ? `,', 1 E r..,,_ a ,
g i v 33 • I I
♦♦1 g1 ;; € t 'iv i��♦��.
Cc ° fl 0 0 p ►
• K
o Oco A DA [ - r G
�N m z 0 • '. 3 6• w
m 5 f , Z 0N � (1
�i�MN O o - -p CA
s8p4 m % mr- _ '• -
, g
CA gl D3 � I.
" ° (Zip D m "' I Ib.
+g O
•
$-g = dD \
it
A —1 A z
Ej
e W
�. O 0
=T
&,.. & Tp.;
//, 13)11
1
ThE LAND
GROUP. nvc. I Ili
A-
r— 0 A • I :nw ,n::,il;9°14re EAGLE PAVILI (N �c a. ; .m
I r) o o • 1e Plunnmg EAGLE, IDAF • - n 1 1 i - r
� m � � � � � � •Etiv!*onmvntu!Planning
0 129 S. 39 £ogle,19.93919 O -•v m I
Phone(208)939-/0.1 rem(209)939-.45
i ��I ��
v06
m Q,
c mm
0