Minutes - 1996 - Planning & Zoning - 04/15/1996 - Regular
EAGLE PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING MINUTES
April 15, 1996
The Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session on
April 15, 1996. Chairman BRADLEY presiding.
The following members were present: BERT BRADLEY,
RUSSEL MAYER, COLLEEN MAILE, FARRIN FARNWORTH.
DONALD BRINTON,
Moved by BRINTON and seconded by MAYER to approve the minutes of
the April 1, 1996, meeting as presented. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
OXFORD COURT SUBDIVISION-REZONE/PRELIMINARY PLAT (continued):
Chairman BRADLEY declared a conflict of interest, BRINTON will act
as Chairman for this issue.
Boesiger indicated he didn't know if the sewer district had
approved the findings on the annexation of his project into the
district.
The City Attorney spoke to the Commissioners regarding the
"Processing of Subdivision Applications Pending Availability of
Sewer Connection from the Eagle Sewer District" memorandum.
(Attached)
Public hearing closed at 8:05 p.m.
Moved by MAYER and seconded by FARNWORTH to approve the application
for a rezone and preliminary plat with the following conditions:
1.
The CC&R's used for Lexington Hills Subdivision be adopted
for use in the Oxford Court Subdivision.
All Pathways are to be paved.
All Fencing will be the same as Lexington, with no full length
fence in between Lexington and this development.
A reduction of two lots on either side of Brunswick. Lot 2 to
lot 9 would be reduced by one lot and equal amounts on other
lots. One lot would be taken out on block 1, lot 2 to 6 in
equal amounts. The land would be divided equally between those
other lots.
The Developer needs to provide, in writing, adequate evidence
that there is reasonable sewer capacity for this subdivision.
Require an indemnification clause on the sewer issue signed by
the developer.
Standard City Conditions.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1
5.
AYE: BRINTON, MAYER, FARNWORTH.
CARRIED.
ABSTAIN: MAILE, BRADLEY.
MOTION
EDGE DEVELOPMENT - CLARIFICATION: Mary Berent outlined the entities
reports including ACHD's recommendation to defer this project.
Dean Gunderson, representative of the architect, spoke regarding
the development and the question of withdrawal or deferral of the
application.
The Chairman declared that he will accept the withdrawal and not
the deferment.
PUBLIC HEARING:
(continued) :
ORDINANCE
270
NOTICE
LAND
USE
ACTIONS
Chairman BRADLEY declared it was the time and the place for a
public hearing regarding Ordinance 270, on the Land Use Notices.
The public hearing was continued on March 18,1996, to incorporate
the following into the draft ordinance:
To amend the proposal with the following recommendations:
1.
All CUP applications referencing ECC Section 8 -3 -2. E will
require one 11 x 17 sign only.
2.
All other applications, one parcel or multiple parcels,
requiring public hearing notices, will post 4 x 4 signs.
3.
The sign will be printed on 2 sides, placed perpendicular to
roadways.
4.
In the event that the development includes properties with
over 500 feet of road frontage the requirement will be that a
sign be placed on each end of the project road frontage, with
exceptions of a corner lot which will require three signs, one
on the corner and two on the specific ends of the properties
roadway frontages.
All signs will be mounted between two 4 x 4 posts so that the
bottom of the sign is 3 feet above the ground.
The public hearing closed at
testimony.
9:00 p.m.
There was no public
Moved by BRINTON and seconded by MAILE to approve the ordinance as
corrected:
Page 1: The title should read the signs will be 4x4
Page 11, c. 4th sentence should read - - -"lettering" not "letters"
2
AYE: MAILE, BRINTON, MAYER. NAY: FARNWORTH.
MOTION CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS:
Ada County Transmittal 96-13-PDR/96-11-ZC - Foxtail Subdivision:
Gary Lasher outlined the proposal on the property.
Moved by MAILE and seconded by MAYER to approve the transmittal as
presented with the staff recommendations with rural type roads and
sidewalks. P&Z sends the message to Ada County that the
recommendation to Ada County that although this is in conformity
with the Eagle Comprehensive Plan we do not want it to be assumed
by approving it that Eagle favors one acre land use under R1 for
this or any other parcel with a low density designation under the
Comprehensive Plan. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIED.
Ada County Transmittal
Ordinance:
96-04
ZOA/Amendment
Ada
County
Zoning
Moved by BRINTON and seconded by MAILE to approve the transmittal
as presented. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIED.
Ada County
Recreation:
Transmittal
96-26-CU
-Idaho
Dept
of
Parks
and
Moved by FARNWORTH and seconded by BRINTON to accept the
transmittal as presented with a recommendation that the rock
crusher be in use from sun up to sun down only.
OLD BUSINESS:
Impact Area Expansion discussion: The City received
correspondence from the County advising the Commission of an
intended meeting on May 9, 1996 before Ada County P&Z. The County
wants to discuss the Eagle Impact area. The proposal is to add the
area that will be used for the sports park into Eagle's impact
area. The remainder of the initial request from the City of Eagle
for negotiations with Ada County was not in this proposal. This
proposal suggests this area is not to be annexed into Eagle. After
discussion the P&Z asked staff to submit all letters to and from
Ada County on the proposal made by the City of Eagle in 1994. The
issue will be continued until the next regularly scheduled meeting
to review that information.
City Report: City Clerk
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 10:15
p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
3
'--- ----------
-:."" ,n~U~~#tt
,~'\ ,-., ~., ~~, ,",7,
.,' r.'.-{ \,J ~ .(;.'i .'-, "J'~
,', "",'Pl'!"., ,;","..
.:' G" eO" '-"..':~>~;\
., -
B BARA MOr-w ER ;~ ~+ :
EAGLE CITY tL~R,. "':'IT />' -:
~ "',,¡-~_..t'..,.u""á. ::
'=' _I\. c. (¡'j, c':) ¿'- ::
~v<)..o..~on¡,."'...';",v -0.:-
~'- -r.ÁJ1~".""<i""'" .X:.."
~#:., 'f1:'\r"'" .."
#"'~ ..OF lV""
"",.....u'"
':
,.-
4