Minutes - 2018 - Planning & Zoning - 03/19/2018 - RegularTHE CITY OF EAGLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMi1IISSION
March 19, 2018
Minutes
CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order at 6:01 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL: Present: WRIGHT, JOHNSON, and SMITH. Absent: GUERBER. A quorum is
present.
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
♦ Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one motion. There will
be no separate discussion on these items unless the Chairman, a Commissioner, member of City
Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items
removed from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence
determined by the Rules of Order.
♦ Any item on the Consent Agenda that contains written recommendations from the City of Eagle
shall be adopted as part of the Planning & Zoning Commission's Consent Agenda approval
motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Minutes of March 5, 2018.
B. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law for A-05-17/RZ-09-17/CU-14-17/PPUD-08-17/PP-
09-17 — Creighton Woods Subdivision — Creighton Woods Development, Inc.: Creighton
Woods Development, Inc., represented by Tamara Thompson with The Land Group, Inc., is
requesting an annexation, rezone from RUT (Residential -Urban Transition — Ada County
designation), R -E (Residential -Estates), and R-1 (Residential) to R -2 -DA -P (Residential with a
development agreement — PUD), conditional use permit, preliminary development plan and
preliminary plat approvals for Creighton Woods Subdivision, a 64 -lot (58 residential, 6
common) residential planned unit development. The 50.92 -acre site, consisting of four (4)
parcels, is located south of the South Channel of the Boise River between the terminus of West
Oakhampton Drive on the east and the terminus of East Clear Creek Drive on the west.
Smith makes a motion to recommend for approval the consent agenda and minutes as written.
Seconded by Johnson. ALL AYES... MOTION CARRIES.
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. A-01-18/RZ-01-18 & PP -01-18 — Hazen Ranch Subdivision — Bristol Company: Bristol
Company, represented by Shawn Nickel with SLN Planning, is requesting an annexation, rezone
from RUT (Rural -Urban Transition — Ada County designation) to R -E -DA (Residential -Estates
with a development agreement), and preliminary plat approvals for Hazen Ranch Subdivision, a
17 -lot (17 -buildable) residential subdivision. The 35.18 -acre site is located on the east side of
North Meridian Road at the southeast corner of West Caliber Court and North Meridian Road at
2044 and 2400 North Meridian Road.
City Planner, Mike Williams, informs the Commission that staff has requested that the application
be continued to the April 2, 2018 Commission hearing due to the fact that a report has not been
received from Ada County Highway District (ACHD).
Smith makes a motion on 5A A-01-18/RZ-01-18 & PP -01-18 — Hazen Ranch Subdivision —
Bristol Company be rescheduled until the April 2nd Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting. Seconded by Johnson. ALL AYES... MOTION CARRIES.
Page 1 of 5
K:\P&ZVAI NUTES\2018\PZ-03-19.18min. doc
B. A-04-17/RZ-08-17/CU-13-17/PPUD-07-17/PP-08-17 — Park Lane Estates Subdivision —
Yellowiacket Development. Inc.: Yellowjacket Development, Inc., represented by Corinne
Graham with Civil Site Works, LLC, is requesting an annexation, rezone from RUT
(Residential -Urban Transition — Ada County designation) to R -2 -DA -P (Residential with a
development agreement — PUD), conditional use permit, preliminary development plan and
preliminary plat approvals for Park Lane Estates Subdivision, a 24 -lot (19 residential, 5
common) residential planned unit development. The 11.23 -acre site is located on the southeast
corner of West Beacon Light Road and North Park Lane at 2686 North Park Lane.
Corinne Graham, Civil Site Works, 921 South Orchard Street, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho, 83705. The
applicant's representative provides a brief overview of the application.
Graham responds to questions from the Commission.
City Planner, Mike Williams, provides a detailed overview of the application.
Williams responds to questions from the Commission.
Chairman Wright opens the Public Hearing.
Michelle Green, 2549 North Hearthglow Place. Green opposes to the application due to the
proposed density.
Tom Brengle, 2475 North Sun Valley Place, is speaking on behalf of Friends of Beacon Light.
Brengle opposes the application due to the traffic that will be generated by the development, and the
improvements that may be required on surrounding roads as a result of the increased traffic.
Brengle responds to questions from the Commission.
Rick Shields, 2740 North Hearthglow Place. Shields opposes the application due to the density and
the inclusion of the existing large lot in the density calculation.
Nick Genna, 2661 North Park Lane. Genna opposes the application due to the proposed density, the
density calculations, and the impact that the proposed development may have on the surrounding
area.
Genna responds to questions from the Commission.
City Planner, Mike Williams, explains that without the existing property included in the calculation,
the density of the subdivision would calculate to 1.95 -dwelling units per acre.
Deborah Kotnik, 2519 North Hearthglow Place. Kotnik opposes the application due to the proposed
density and lot sizes. Kotnik inquires whether the CC&Rs will allow goats, chickens, etc., expresses
concerns about the number of trips per day, the proposed shared driveway, and the pedestrian -only
access to the common area.
Kotnik responds to questions from the Commission.
City Attorney, Cherese McLain, provides information regarding State law requirements for
subdividing a property.
Stephanie Sherlock, 2741 North Hearthglow Avenue. Sherlock opposes the application and inquires
whether the existing large lot could be redeveloped at a future time, whether subdivisions typically
include singular large -lots, and requests that the fencing be required to be consistent throughout the
subdivision.
Sherlock responds to questions from the Commission.
Margot LeRogue, 2499 North Hearthglow Place. LeRogue opposes the application, and expresses
concerns about the no -parking requirement on the private street and the positioning of the proposed
lots with the existing adjacent lots.
Page 2 of 5
KAP&Z1MINUTE8X2018 PZ-03-19-18min.doc
Curtis Stoddard, 2462 North Majestic Place. Stoddard inquires how many houses will be allowed to
be built along Beacon Light Road in the future, shares his experience of interacting with Ada
County Highway District regarding the widening of Beacon Light Road, and explains why he feels
growth should be limited.
Jane Klosterman, 2686 Park Lane. Klosterman, the owner of the property, explains the history of the
surrounding area and the growth that has occurred in the area.
Nick Genna, 2661 North Park Lane. Genna inquiries about the format of the public hearing.
The Commission responds to Genna's inquiry.
The applicant's representative provides rebuttal, addresses the concerns from public testimony, and
responds to questions from the Commission.
City Planner, Mike Williams, responds to questions from the Commission.
Chairman Wright closes the Public Hearing.
General discussion amongst the Commission regarding the application.
Smith makes a motion to recommend for approval application #A-04-17/RZ-08-17/CU-13-
17/PPUD-07-17/PP-08-17, to recommend for approval with the following changes: On page 7
of 28 — "Site Specific Condition #6 the required setbacks shall be as follows," I'd like to take
the recommendation of the City Planner that that is something that can be ongoing in terms of
negotiating appropriate setbacks based on the applicant's design. On page 6 of 28, Site
Specific Condition #5 regarding the fencing. After item #5, I just simply added "Planner
Language" from that time, which I believe addressed the issues of uniformity in fencing, and
the like, and also recommending a fence for the Haak and Thomas property. Add condition
3.9 which says landscape buffer requirements as required by Eagle City Code 8-2A-7 shall be
waived for Lot 13, Block 1, adjacent to Park lane, until such time that development occurs.
Johnson: The developer did ask about adding site specific condition #5, adding wording about Lot
13, Block 1 could install open fencing style on south side, and privacy fencing on north, to be
removed upon redevelopment.
Wright: Mr. Williams, I believe your input is welcomed here.
Williams: Mr. Chairman, what this condition does is address the solid privacy fencing adjacent to
the south property line, that would be the Haak property. That also addresses to allow them to do the
privacy fencing adjacent to the north where the existing house is, and upon redevelopment, at that
time, it is to be removed.
Smith (referring to the powerpoint slide): So does the current in red... does that address all of your
concerns that you had stated in the black?
Mike Williams: Correct. So 3.4 is only for the CC&Rs. I'd requested we leave this language as is
and then add the additional language to site specific condition #5. My concern with the fencing that
I spoke about, you actually addressed that in your motion.
Seconded by Wright.
Williams: Clarification — I want to discuss two items, and it's nothing new. I just want to get
clarification on your setbacks and on their proposal on the development agreement; for #3.9, staff
would request that we're able to add the language in regard to alternative method of compliance
because that's part of the design review process. In order to allow them to not be required to do that
buffer adjacent to that existing home, that will have to go through an alternative method of
compliance as part of design review. If this motion is approved, we will add language in regard to
that application as well. And then on your setbacks — is the intent to follow what the applicant had
requested or is the intent to follow what staff discussed in regard to the private street section? And
Page 3 of 5
KAP&ZW1NUTES\2018 PZ-03-19-18min.d•
also, is the intent to possibly reduce side setbacks to 7.5 -feet, or possibly look at only lots of a
certain width to be reduced to 7.5 -feet?
Smith: The intent was on your 32 -foot recommendation for that private road, driveways. Do
you recall that discussion? So that's what I had in mind in terms of the private road, that the
setback would be the 32 -feet that you recommended.
Williams: I believe the discussion was that since that lot line that was associated with the private
road was actually located behind the sidewalk to start with, that staff would be open to 25 -feet on
the private street only.
Smith: Nly concession at 25 -feet.
Williams: The 7.5 -foot side setbacks — did you want to leave them at 10, or did you want to go to the
7.5?
Smith: Recommendation is 10 -feet.
Williams: One more question — the street side setback on Lot 14, we had it at 33 -feet. Since that
street side is on that private road where the lot line is located adjacent — excuse me, where we'll
measure that setback from, if we were at 20 -feet, they'd be fine to put a car in front of the garage
without overhanging anything. Or we can leave it at 25, your choice.
Discussion.
Smith: So my choice right now is the 25 -feet or 20 -feet? Then go with 25.
TWO AYES, ONE NAY (Johnson)... MOTION CARRIES.
NEW BUSINESS: NONE
REPORTS:
A. Commission: None.
B. City Attorney: City Attorney, Cherese McLain, informs the Commission that the public hearing
for the oil & gas ordinance was noticed on Saturday, and informs the Commission that the draft
ordinance will be made available to the Commission during the week.
C. Staff: City Planner, Mike Williams, informs the Commission that City Planner Brian Parker's
last day with the City will be March 301h. Williams provides a brief overview of upcoming
applications. Clerk of the Meeting, Kristl Caron, informs the Commission that with
Commissioner Koellisch's resignation from the Commission, the vice -chair role is vacant, and
informs the Commission that a new vice -chair will be elected during the next meeting.
Commissioner Johnson volunteers to lead the next meeting due to Chairman Wright's absence.
ADJOURNMENT:
Smith moves to adjourn. Seconded by Wright. ALL AYES... MOTION CARRIES.
Hearing no further business, the Commission meeting adjourned at 9:05 P.M.
Page 4 of 5
K:\P&Z\M I N UT ES\2018\PZ-03-19-18min.doc
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
KRIATIL D. CARON
CLERK OF THE MEETING
APPROVED:
l
-�-T" Aopst,�,�
TRENT WRIGH ,
CHAIRMAN
AN AUDIO RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD AT
W W W.CITYOFEAGLE.ORG.
Page 5 of 5
K:\PBZ\MINUTES\2018\PZ-03.19-18min.doc
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET
A-04-17/RZ-08-17/CU-13-17/PPUD-97-17/PP-08-17 — Park Lane Estates Subdivision — Yellowiacket Development, Inc.:
Yellowjacket Development. Inc.. represented by Corinne Graham with Civil Site Works. LLC, is requesting an annexation, rezone
from RUT (Residential -Urban Transition — Ada County designation) to R -2 -DA -P (Residential with a development agreement — PUD),
conditional use permit, preliminary development plan and preliminary plat approvals for Park Lane Estates Subdivision, a 24 -lot (19
residential, 5 common) residential planned unit development. The 11.23 -acre site is located on the southeast corner of West Beacon
Light Road and North Park Lane at 2686 North Park Lane.
March 19, 2018
ADDRESS/
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) TELEPHONE/E-MAIL
eb1,01tn OCf.'LT6
ire ixorA kJ
�rePn
TESTIFY?
YES/NO PRO/CON
ARe CAW LA.. C )(0c0 -1 NEa QP -6)
2 51 `� f\ic r--ij1 t-61,40 (off i Yes Co ►V
�4.07_651.2 es9- FY/0Al `kgar-'hey (v
t
f } j
247,E �' Scca1 e fi4(.c
(\ • Of cN
1 "-11 /LJ. Fiat KIA 4,4A1,1
a2c/ 16 CA
3ZGl.
;./ C.toi I- (i.Jr
(ICS 1 PM LAWC-
Cork)
C7,
c cry
Alt