The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes - 2001 - Planning & Zoning - 10/01/2001 - Regular ORIGI¡~AL EAGLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 1, 2001 6:30 PM '-, The Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session on October 1,2001 Vice- Chairman Deckers presiding. 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: The following members were present BLOOM, DECKERS, NORDSTROM, CADWELL. Absent: FRANDEN. A quorum is present. Deckers opens the meeting by discussing the Cavello application, the Commissioners would like to have Franden present for this item. Deckers discusses item 5F and states that this item will possibly not be heard by 10:00 p.m. and should be continued to a special meeting. Bloom moves to continue RZ-12-00 MOD - Development Agreement Modification- Coulter Properties LLC to a Special Planning & Zoning Meeting on October 4, 2001. Seconded by Nordstrom. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Minutes of September 17, 2001. B. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law for A-2-01 & RZ-S-Ol - Annexation and Rezone from RUT to R-E - Pacific Ridee: Pacific Ridge, represented by David Bailey with Hubble Engineering Inc., is requesting a rezone upon annexation from RUT (Rural Urban Transitional) to R-E (Residential Estates - one dwelling unit per two acres) for Autumncrest Subdivision. The 39.92-acre, 20-1ot (19-buildable) residential subdivision is generally located on the west side of Ballantyne Road, approximately 1,4 mile south of Beacon Light Road. C. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law for PP-S-Ol - Autumncrest Subdivision - Pacific Ridee: Pacific Ridge, represented by David Bailey with Hubble Engineering Inc., is requesting preliminary plat approval for Autumncrest Subdivision. The 39.92-acre, 20-1ot (19-buildable) residential subdivision is generally located on the west side of Ballantyne Road, approximately 1,4 mile south of Beacon Light Road. D. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law for RZ-14-00 MOD - Development Aereement Modification - IFI Partners II: IFI Partners II, represented by John G. Evans, is requesting a modification to the development agreement previously approved by the City on April 10, 2001 for the site proposed to be developed as Great Sky Estates No.7 Subdivision. The 2.98-acre site is generally located on the southwest comer of Hill Road and State Highway 55, approximately 575-feet west of State Highway 55. E. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law for PP-9-01 - Great Sky Estates Page 1 of 8 K:\P&Z\MINUTESITemporary Minutes Work ArealPZ-lO-Olmin-doc Subdivision No.7 - IFI Partners II: IFI Partners II, represented by John G. Evans is requesting preliminary plat approval for Great Sky Estates No.7 Subdivision. The 2.98-acre, II-lot (5-residential, 4-commercial, 2-common) subdivision is generally located on the southwest comer of Hill Road and State Highway 55, approximately 575-feet west of State Highway 55. F. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law for A-5o0l & RZ-8-0l - Annexation and Rezone from RUT to R-E - Northwest Development LLC: Northwest Development, LLc., represented by Matt Munger with Hubble Engineering, is requesting a rezone upon annexation from RUT (Rural Urban Transitional- Ada County Designation) to R-E (Residential Estates - one dwelling unit per two acres). The 38.64-acre site is located on the west side of North Meridian Road, approximately '12 mile north of Floating Feather Road. G. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law for PP-lO-Ol - Henrv's Subdivision - Northwest Development LLC: Northwest Development, LLc., represented by Matt Munger with Hubble Engineering, is requesting preliminary plat approval for Henry's Subdivision. The 38.64-acre, 20-lot (19-buildable) residential subdivision is located on the west side of North Meridian Road, approximately '12 mile north of Floating Feather Road. Bloom moves to approve the consent agenda as amended. Discussion. Deckers moves to remove both item 3C and 3G from the consent agenda for discussion. Seconded by Nordstrom. 3 AYE (Deckers Abstained)...MOTION CARRIES. Discussion on item 3G, Henry's Subdivision. Nordstrom moves to approve item 3C on the consent agenda, PP-5-0l - Autumncrest Subdivision. Seconded by Bloom. 3 AYE (Deckers abstained)...MOTION CARRIES. Nordstrom moves to approve item 3G on the consent agenda, PP-lO-Ol - Henry's Subdivision. Seconded by Bloom. 2 AYE (Deckers and Cadwell abstained)...MOTION CARRIES. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. PP-6-0l - Cavallo Estates Subdivision - Joe Glaisverl Capitol Securities: Joe Glaisyer/Capitol Securities, represented by David Bailey with Hubble Engineering Inc., is requesting preliminary plat approval for Cavallo Estates Subdivision. The 61.94-acre lot (30-buildable) residential subdivision is generally located on the northwest comer of Floating Feather Road and Meridian Road. (This item was continued from September 17, 2001, Planning & Zoning Meeting). Deckers introduces the item. Cadwell recuses himself from this item. David Bailey, with Hubble Engineering, representing the applicant presents the application. The applicant has met with the Chevron Pipeline Representatives and will be able to meet the depth requirements as required. They would like to propose that the greenbelt path be within the landscape buffer along Floating Feather and the west side of the subdivision, up to Park Lane. Discusses the letters received from homeowners in Lorenzo Estates Subdivision and addresses their concerns on the irrigation system and how they will meter the water share. Page 2 of 8 I\EAGLENTIICOMMON\P&ZIMINUTESITernporary Minutes Work AreaIPZ-IO-Olmin.doc Discussion between Commissioner Bloom and the applicant regarding headlights shining on to the neighbor, Mr. Schroeder who resides to the east across N. Meridian Road. Discussion on changes in lot sizes. Discussion on ground water issues. The applicant states that they have been monitoring the ground water for Central District Health. The nutrient pathogen study has been submitted to c.D.H. Discussion on compatibility and density issue. Deckers would like the recent letters received from the public to be included in the City Council packet. Bloom would like to see the landscape along Meridian become an easement and maintained by the homeowners association. Nordstrom disagrees with Bloom on this landscape buffer and does not think we should require the applicant to provide the landscape buffer. Discussion amongst the Commission. Deckers discusses the pathway along the pipeline and states that any opportunity to install pathways is a good idea. Would like City Council to look further at the density issue and take a broader view on density transitioning. Nordstrom moves to approve PP-6-01- Cavallo Estates Subdivision - Joe Glaisyerl Capitol Securities with staff recommendations with the following additions to the site- specific conditions; . Include new plat drawing proposed by the applicant. Include a pathway along the Chevron Pipeline that would connect from the beginning of the subdivision in block three following the southern boundary of lots 3,4 and the northern boundary of lot 2, up to Selvago Way and then connecting to Selvago Way and following the pathway through Sella Way out to the end of the subdivision on the western boundary. The entry design on the east side at Fieno Way drawn so that there are no light conflicts with the property across the road owned by Mr. Jeffrey Schroeder of light deterrents coming into his house or property that would be negative to the residence. . . . The subdivision recognizes the demands of water in this area and become good neighbors when sharing and understand the water rights and work with other users on the lateral. A letter from ACHD regarding changes to the subdivision on curb and gutter based on their requirements. . . The lighting meets the conditions for "dark sky lighting" requirements so we do not have obtrusive lighting. Seconded by Deckers. Where the pathway stubs out at the end circle at Sella Way that it follows along the south property line of lots 2 & 3 out to the end of the subdivision. Discussion. . Page 3 of 8 K\P&Z\MlNUTESITernporary Minutes Work AreaIPZ-IQ-Olmin.doc Deckers makes an alternate motion to keep the language identical to the previous motion but with the addition "that there be a 25 foot landscape easement along eastern portion of Meridian Road and it shall be maintained by the homeowners association". Alternate motion seconded by Bloom. 2 A YES 1 NAY (Nordstrom) (Cadwell Abstained). Original motion dies. B. Zonine: Ordinance Amendment - ZOA-6.01 - Land Consultants Inc.: Land Consultants Inc., represented by Mark Butler is proposing to amend Eagle City Code Title 8, Chapter 2, Section 3, to allow Ambulance Services, Nursing/Convalescent Homes (including senior assisted living facilities) and Government Buildings (offices) to be permitted uses, or permitted with a conditional use permit, in additional zoning districts and to amend Section 4 to add Note J to allow Child Care Facilities, Churches, Nursing/Convalescent Homes (including senior assisted living facilities), Government Buildings (offices) and Schools (Public or Private) to increase the maximum lot coverage from 10% to 35% in any A, A-R, and R-E zoning districts) (This item was continuedfrom the August 20, 2001, Planning & Zoning Meeting). Deckers introduces the item. Mark Butler 52 N. 2nd Street, Eagle. Mr. Butler with Land Consultants would like to change the maximum lot coverage from 20 to 25%. Jeff Lowe, city staff clarifies the language in the ordinance. Deckers opens the public hearing. Bloom moves to continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment - ZOA-6-01 - Land Consultants Inc, to the Special Meeting on October 4, 2001. Seconded by Cadwell. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Deckers combines both item 5A & 5B for the public hearing with separate motions. A. A-6-01 & RZ-09-01- Annexation and Rezone from RUT to R-l- Brie:hton Corporation: Brighton Corporation, represented by Wardle & Associates, is requesting a rezone upon annexation from RUT (Rural Urban Transitional) to R-l (Residential- up to one unit per acre). The 124.3-acre site is generally located on the northwest corner of Meridian Road and Chinden Boulevard. B. PP-ll-Ol- McKay Subdivision - Brie:hton Corporation: Brighton Corporation, represented by Wardle & Associates, is requesting preliminary plat approval for McKay Subdivision. The 124.3-acre, 112-lot (98-buildable, 14 common) residential subdivision is generally located on the northwest corner of Meridian Road and Chinden Boulevard. Mike Wordell, Boise Ave, Boise, representing the Brighton Corporation presents the application. Mr. Wordell stresses for the record that this application complies with the comprehensive plan and the ordinances of the City of Eagle. Page 4 of 8 K:\P&Z\MINUTESITemporary Minutes Work AreaIPZ-10-Olmin.doc Jeff Lowe, city staff presents the staff report. Mr. Lowe states the reasons for denying this application. Mike Rino, from Central District Health answers Commissions questions on the nutrient pathogen study. Mr. Rino explains what this study entails. Deckers opens the public hearing. Wayne Coleman, 232 River Heights Drive, Meridian. Mr. Coleman lives immediately north of this parcel. This subdivision has the appearance of a checkerboard. He is not against development but would like to see a variety of lot sizes and meandering roads and open space. Terry Porter, 7352 Winward Drive, Meridian. Mr. Porter lives north of this proposed subdivision. Taxes have increased and the standard of living has decreased. Mr. Porter feels that the lot sizes are to small and the traffic flow will not be able to handle any more development. Dennis Hansen, 465 West Sly Fox Street, Meridian. Speaks in opposition to this development. This subdivision plat is not comparable to the surrounding subdivision. He is also concerned about the septic tank issue. He was not able to put a septic tank in the back of his house and now will have four in his back yard. He is also concerned about transportation. This area can not support increased traffic. Mr. Hansen also does not think there is enough water to support this. Mary Anne Hansen, 465 West Sly Fox. Was originally told this area would be five-acre lots. Is also concerned about the increase in traffic onto Winward Road. Ms. Hansen suggests that Brighton Development create their own entrance onto Chinden Road. Deckers calls a brief break. Tobe Thompson 505 River Heights. He is opposed to this development and would like to see the lot sizes upgraded to 3 acres. "Do not make the same mistakes made in the past". Traffic count has not been done in over a year and numerous developments have taken place in this area. Pat McGarran, 795 River Heights Drive, north of the subdivision. Addresses septic systems. Ms. McGarran has a master's degree in Environmental Health and has a lot of knowledge in this area. Lots less than five acres could be an environmental health concern Mike McGraft 1011 River Heights Drive, is in opposition to this development mainly because of the increase in traffic at an already busy intersection. This will create a large safety concern. Would like to see responsible development. Harriet Calverley, 913 River Heights Drive, states she will touch a comer of this subdivision. Will there be minimum CC&R's? and what will be located on the vacant lot? Would like to see larger lot sizes. Also, would like to have a traffic signal paid for by the developer. Paul Calverley, 913 River Heights Drive. Mr. Calverley would like the Commission to listen to the factual information provided by Ms. McGarran Page 5 of 8 K:\P&zIMINUTESITemporary Minutes Work AreaIPZ-l!}-Olmin.doc Reed Bowen, 6677 Fox Tail Subdivision. Concerned about the increased traffic. There are numerous children in this area that need to catch school buses. People will use his neighborhood for a quicker route onto Chinden. Two deaths have already occurred at Meridian and Chinden Road. Dale Lindley, 1635 Dunsmire is representing the Lindley Family that is asking for the rezone. His family has owned this property since 1958. Would like to receive the same treatment as they did when they sold the Castlebury property. Brian ScWader 6620 Fox Tail Run. The nearest I-acre subdivision close to this subdivision is over 1 mile away. Mr. Schlader states that he does not think that the Lindleys have been treated unfairly. Thinks that a traffic signal is a small investment by the developer for the safety of families. Bob Stow 6722 N. Winward. Mr. Stow property backs up to the Lindley farm, agrees with most other statements heard tonight regarding the septic issue, lets apply the new standards. Asks "why does transportation have to follow development? it can come before". States that this project should only be approved for 5 acre lots. Karen Thornberry 6980 N. Meridian Road. Ms. Thornberry states that you can not compare this development to Castleberry as they have a different outlet to Chinden Blvd. Meridian Road is not as wide as Locust Grove. Donna Knittel, 7280 Winward Drive. Also shares the same concerns about traffic. There are many small children in the adjoining subdivisions. Is also concerned about well contamination. The developer has not given consideration to the existing homeowners. David Vail 1748 Winward Drive. Mr. Vail would like to clarify several items. The closest area that the developer has used for comparison is over 1/2 mile away. Would also like the City of Eagle to work with the City of Meridian. Mr. Vail has spoken with 86 people who signed the petition and not one person refused to sign this petition. Diane Anderson, 500 River Heights Drive. Member of the Meridian School Board but is not representing them but rather herself. She has information on how this will affect the children to share. This growth area will require more schools to be built. Would rather see the Lindleys stay in this area and farm. Kevin Sommer is currently building a home in the Castlebury Subdivision. Mr. Sommer states that this is a money making deal for the developer. Is concerned about the increase traffic, the higher density and the appearance of this subdivision. Larry Sandusky lives in the Clearview Estates Subdivision. Is concerned about safety at the busy roads. States that this is one of the highest traffic areas in the county. Mike Wordel provides a rebuttal. Mr. Wordel states that the Brighton Corp will pay their share for a traffic signal if the homeowners in the other subdivisions that need this traffic signal pay for the other half. Commission asks question of staff regarding the non-conforming use. Page 6 of 8 K:\P&Z\MINUTESITernporary Minutes Work AreaIPZ-lO-Olmin.doc Commissioner asks City Attorney, John McFadden to also respond to the rezone and if it is in conformance of the Comprehensive plan. Discussion amongst the Commission. Deckers would like to note in the record that three letters were submitted in opposition to this development. Nordstrom moves to deny A-6-01 & RZ-O9-01- Annexation and Rezone from RUT to R- 1 - Brighton Corporation based on staff recommendation of the non-conforming use and the ground water and traffic congestion issues. A development agreement would not be appropriate for this application. Seconded by Bloom. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. Planning & Zoning Commissioners conditions for City Council: . Meandering roadway design . Detached sidewalk with street trees. . Condition the preliminary plat on the nutrient pathogen guidelines and the Nutrient Pathogen Study results should be available for public review and time to make comments. . Common areas and amenities. . Varied lot sizes and shapes. . A traffic Study done to look at the access to Chinden Road and to suggest improvements at Chinden and Meridian. These could include turn lanes, traffic signal on Chinden, and look at the alignment with the connection to the Foxtail Subdivision should be redesigned to discourage cut through traffic. . Would like to see pedestrian connection. . Council should consider compatibility with adjacent lot sizes. . If the applicant should make sewer available then this would be a completely different application. . Condition from ITD accepting the appropriate improvements. Deckers closes the public hearing. Deckers moves to deny PP-ll-O1- McKay Subdivision - Brighton Corporation based on the rezone being denied. If council approves the annexation and rezone and proceeds with the preliminary plat to consider the following items discussed above. Seconded by Bloom. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. Bloom moves to continue items 5C & 5E to the October 4, 2001, Special Planning & Zoning Meeting. Seconded by Nordstrom. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. C. RZ-10-01- Rezone from A to R-E - Mike Malterre: Mike Malterre, represented by Phil Hull with Land Group, Inc., is requesting a rezone from A (Agricultural) to R-E (Residential Estates - up to one unit per two-acres). The 9.87-acre site is generally located south of Floating Feather Road approximately 600-feet east of Ballantyne Road, at 1795 W. Floating Feather Road. D. CU-O8-01 - 67-foot hieh Personal Wireless Facility - Qwest Wireless LLC: Qwest Wireless LLc., represented by Kevin Galik with Tetragenics, is requesting conditional use Page 7 of 8 K:\P&ZIMlNUTES\Temporary Minutes Work AreaIPZ-JO-Olmin.doc approval to replace an existing 37-foot high Idaho Power wood utility pole with a 67-foot high wood pole to accommodate a personal wireless facility. The existing pole is located at Eagle Middle School at 1000 W. Floating Feather Road. (This item will be continued to the October 15, 2001, Planning & Zoning meeting). Bloom moves to continue item 5D to the October 15, 2001 Planning & Zoning Meeting. Seconded by Nordstrom. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES. E. PP/FP-I-0l- Mixed Use Subdivision #2 (formally known as Eal!:le River Subdivision) -Eal!:le River. LLC: Eagle River, LLC, represented by Bill Clark with Clark Development, is requesting combined preliminary plat and final plat approval for Mixed Use Subdivision #2 (formally know as Eagle River Subdivision). The 46.4-acre, lO-lot (9 commercial, I residential) subdivision is located on the southeast comer of Eagle Road and State Highway 44 (State Street). F. RZ-12-00 MOD - Development Al!:reement Modification - Coulter Properties LLC: Coulter Properties LLC, represented by Mark Butler with Land Consultants Inc., is requesting a change to the conditions within the development agreement and a change to the concept site plan previously approved by the City for rezone application RZ-12-00 (rezoned from A (Agricultural) to MU-DA (Mixed Use with a Development Agreement». The 24.84-acre site is located on the west side of Edgewood Lane approximately 2,OOO-feet north of East State Street. 6. 7. NEW BUSINESS: None REPORTS: None 8. ADJOURNMENT: Bloom moved to adjourn at 10:57 p.m. Seconded by Nordstrom. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES... RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: SHARON K. MOORE ClTY CLERK/TREAS URER (!¡.~~~- ~ :-":<¡" &~o, "~»~\~,\ *~_.- _I" *! , EALH ¡ ~~~11 ""'"5...!.t't~ A TRANS CRIB ABLE RECORD OF THIS MEETING IS A V AILABLE AT CITY HALL. Page 8 of 8 K:\P&Z\MlNUTESITemporary Minutes Work AreaIPZ-IO-OImin.doc EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Subject: PP -11-01 - McKav Subdivision - Brighton Corporation October 1, 2001 6:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY NAME ADDRESS _De n n r 5 11.40()SL /v -Y4Slo 5/, FOX M /YaAcgen4n$2 yGSu� SiY Fvk /// a;, , .A ' 4M (?1, > ScA4j6.12' G. �,w rt . j < 0.v vv /0/ da -9, *At-, /�� 6 it/cedei PAia. )(Zig b c7 €k ( 7 P -k k(. 2/xiiza../ 6C7 ,& i tWs TELEPHONE PRO? CON? ./722- A)),, aqu i t i ;-(J0 nP /1 his') h k)n"))-11A"'• 19)0 ik) rtg.v1,Q;(11,1 cg -1 „ Ei .•� 2 q i) l/ % /.il1„h9 4.41-f%/ Page 1 of 1 EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET Subject: RZ-10-01 — Rezone from A to R-E — Mike Malterre October 1, 2001 6:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON? Page 1 of 1 EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Subject: RL -12-00 MOD — Development Agreement Modification - Coulter October 1, 2001 6:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE 1,1 10 Ce J PRO? CON? Page 1 of 1 EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET Subject: PP/FP-1-01 — Mixed Use Subdivision #2 (Eagle River) October 1, 2001 6:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON? Page 1 of 1 EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Subject: A-6-01 & RZ-9-01 Annexation and Rezone from RUT to R-1 — Brighton Corporation October 1, 2001 6:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON? Page 1 of 2 frit Cavallo Estates Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application Submitted to: City of Eagle Submitted by: Hubble Engineering,Inc. 701 S. Allen St., Suite 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 322-8992 Submitted for: Capital Securities Joe Glaisyer ISSUES • Chevron Pipeline • Irrigation • Landscape Lot vs Easement • Neighbor Letters • Headlights 4 0.004. 0.44 POO 0,0 .PP.►e1� > f. .4014r La' 1 a Mr 1.= i raw e7' t .4 • SCM,L• 1' . 100' . 1 11 ---i9 N. 1 r! 1014 01.0 0400.. yrmari-cr-ga WPIC. %MUT UCtt01 -qle- .4 44 rM.r .1. taw - r -r Orr w -r wx .4.4 1044. r a {�r� 3 1010 w1 -- t 1 1414.010 1108 4A4 Arm. 44004 Goa IL.14414 q•n4.wuwu..s...wii. tY4.�. mC Fes'-'-�Y r • / ` y� r 1 •rAArq 414.8 tew t • ler ant [ $4200 MSS Or IVA= +y prffildir,err rAT OrhS.dt411r.t RAfl4 1001, a0.' 4 M 4440 w4. a ur• 04111.00, 10..14• 141 •01/.4 ammo 0444. 01 .42/4014.44 .44.1104a.4..j44040 /1¢4 . 0014 - 4W. 0.14x• 114 . HUBBLE >a s ru4. St. ENGINEERING, INC. L'1%.,°,2 0140 04.7 oocanes ma-wer><rcta-rumenta 1") 3"""" •ORS • M. 01.44. 44 4 KO 40.4.a400.44 • w .1u. q4. r.o eft s Hr�.rt .ru OM.2.4.�o 0 4 00.114x1 m..et.r.4l0'i•i. 044►1.,. .. 0x0. ....• 4444 .0.11.4.000 `i w, 4... q x400 .r. 4..0 0. v .1.LL WOW 11411.104! t.040. OK 1.011 N .0. 1000 arta u r ...441444.01 .04 1) MP. 0000• Rima a t 4+0.114 1.A 4 400 1. MIA4 4 .014 •401.4 4M .1.0.104 1!14moa0r6 0.104 .1O0 OM Mt O. lot 04.1101 4 1r1R..O..OQ14 w ft.. 0.10 1004 40 4x0414 O.1 a .44444. MI O1..tl.4rflMtul O4K L 1.4100 a.4fr 41 CAVALLO ESTATES aseatteeeurata 44. a OS.. 110E 14..0 x0410 t 4x04[1s ns wawa 0.4 14003 MCP tart .p. 01.44.1441.4 410.111.14. !rima. r Dia. Q 11100 1.1414 + 444y40 lonr 0100112/r 0.1W .. 00 11 0414 Olt ..sM .. wises. Oro .4 s Oa w 444414.1P 0 0.00 s .14!4[4 OP. w 441401. 40. 00 0041 0114.10.. NFttLIMt AKY NLAI fJ°•° 014-107-00 10d.. t lot t. aaa / O 44044. rata eL . . 1`F t HQ* Ao rt Mt. 4.r'114[.04l M� ...IL.. 4.4.. 444.1..14- [041414' , 04.0 arm spit iCALL WO• - • RUBBLE .11 i • i 1 .,, ej#E$ ± - :C:', ENCIRXERING, INC. 17 "A— ' _..---,AL i ,kros 17407,WIRMWrItYWITW-V:ANWW C''''' 122'99' CAVALLO ESTATES 5.101:16CICAC !AYE ON, WA. ice....4..• ..• wr...4......,W,......j=n;re. in PREI 0.4i1,RY PI AT I ... No. 1 0,13,00 1.1.1•10 ZIA Vellft Ihrsri:r.r MVO Will.lft TA127110Z0411..444 aletrf. ONO WE, W. AO./ i 49°111..10 ' •• 11 I .OS.• 8 10 • j L. 1 630.00' l'F 0 •••• Mare••••••• N f. 1952.09. 0 0 - • 5. 1 I ••r. 8 r SCALE. l• ICO' o..r — no— 0 - - I . • " T • T .... no., vr 13.2717-07-WAT TAG. StritO SEC40. oococ e L- LTh1.1•1=CIELIMP M•••••••• PROJECT SITE ••••LIO1=— • 11•11•01 Mn .34.• •••..k r.t• 4312- 2642 OW525 [6(440.CS U BBLE ENGINEERINC, ONGINCNNIMG stmvxmc PUNNING ('') po., %MORS r000ti erop.'S 74. [US._ 1.11.4 EGW•G • - "Anti 4•7•••••,_ •••••Yeen• 7•.p _ • - • la Will NE. 17.11:04 sr num< • onc o =An • •no. • .oe ... nua •n• oan MORS 0.1amt••• Lrik= '0•1•97.1 •;.•7; 1••••••••• MOO W.. O. salgam. •••4 .1.o. woo woo oo. • • .5H.Li.gaaror COOIR/APPLICANT CAVALLO ESTATES •••••:09/Xli •••••,•• •••••••• 1111,4 •1).4 0 •••=1•• 4 Pea,a, • le -,l•••• ma ...on sow •1•5•K 1.+K • 0,•••.• 1 AP PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 •.`Te Or -107-00 1.0CARO 41.411 nom I or morn.... rows aa no on to h It/. YelOn. oft_ mu, DK. CO.•••••,....0 1 October 1, 2001 Subdivisionw Growth near Chindon Avenue and N. Meridian Road: _F Meridian School District position is neutral on development. It is the city's responsibility to plan and implement growth. However, the school district must be aware of and respond to growth in order for schools to keep up with the community need. Broad Overview: 8 Square Mile growth area between Ustick Rd. and Chindon Ave. is now in the planning stages. $12 million for land (abt. 300 acres) $140 million for schools. Anticipate 8 elementary schools, 3 middle schools, 2 high schools''=s-r- k -1T' `—`i'�`-1't <<, t., �. _,� .rs•.,,j h.._> >>.(t,r(1¢+ci�� `Y Gt lrn� Ada County permits one home with septic tank per 5 acres. Eagle City's area of impact goes south across the Boise River to Chindon Avenue. Eagle City permits one home with septic system per 1 acre. Meridian City at this time does not permit septic tanks on one acre. Emphasis is on more condensed living space that range from 1/4 to 3/4 acres, which must be on the city sewer system. Chindon's future is to be widened to a 5 lane highway. Subdivision Growth in Question: Castlebury Subdivision — Yorgason developer 67 homes on 79 acres 1 -acre Tots with septic tanks Access road is off of Chindon Avenue Number of school children projected: Elementary (26) Andrus (bused to Ustick Elem - overcrowding) Middle Sch (18) Eagle Middle School High School (17) Eagle High School Total 61 students is McKay Subdivision — Dave Turnbull developer 9't homes on 105 acres 1 -acre lots with septic tanks Access road is Meridian Road Number of school children projected: Elementary (35) Andrus (will be bused due to overcrowding) Middle Sch (27) Eagle Middle School High School (28) Eagle High School Total 90 students 1 School Use/Growth: Eagle Middle and Eagle High School must still take overflow students using portable classrooms (6 portables are presently being used at Eagle High School). Andrus Elementary School: Capacity is 652 June had 696 (106.75%) Sept had 678 (26 students over capacity) Andrus boundaries go from Garden City to McDermitt, from Boise River bottoms to Chindon and Andrus subdivision, goes south at Meridian Rd. to Ustick & west to McDermitt. Ustick Elementary School: Capacity is 496 June was at 94% capacity Sept had 514 — (18 over capacity) Eagle Hills Elementary: June 96% capacity Sept had about the same Eagle Middle School is presently at capacity. (1200) Eagle High School — Capacity of 1800 students Last year finished at 2272 students This year have install 6 portables to house 12 additional classrooms. New Schools presently under construction to impact area: Sept 2002 Ponderosa Elementary School — capacity of about 600 students 10 Mile & Ustick Rd. boundary committee will define boundaries Sept 2003 Mountain View High School - Locust Grove & Overland Rd. Boundary committee will define boundaries No p, l- )• 1.1 c 1 Miscellaneous Information: Traffic light at Meridian Road is scheduled for 2004 at the present time (cost $100,000). To accelerate its installation would require a petition from local residents along with a designated sum of money to help pay for a portion of the cost. li, 10/01/01 Pat McGavran 846-8700 MCKAY SUBDIVISION SEPTIC SYSTEM CONCERNS • Nutrient Pathway Evaluation Spreadsheet • Screening Tool • Nitrate Attenuation • Better to have site-specific data • Used data from Foxtail and Sugarberry • New Guidance Document now in affect • Septic systems now modeled simultaneously • Dispersivities are more realistic • Subdivision is subject to the Old Guidance • Ran spreadsheet (developed by Mike Reno [CDHD] & Rob Howarth [DEQ] • Using values from Foxtail and Sugarberry • See attached spreadsheet output (circled) • Liberal (not cautious, not conservative) input values • Sugarberry and Foxtail have has 1.7 — 2.0 acre lots • Determined using the Old Guidance • There is no site-specific hydro geological data • Sugarberry and Foxtail Soils may be different • Sugarberry and Foxtail groundwater flow characteristics may be different • McKay probably has shallower depth to groundwater • Evaluation does not account for Surface Water Issues • Surrounding subdivisions have drinking water wells • Recommend 5+ acre lots • Should require: site-specific measurements, accurate hydraulic conductivity values, a nutrient pathogen evaluation and Adherence to the new guidance IDEQ LEVEL 1 NUTRIENT -PATHOGEN EVALUATION NITRO This spreadsheet is based on the mass balance approach documented in: 1985.Bauman, In Proceedings of 5th Northwest On -Site Wastewater Treatment Shortcourse, September INPUT GEN MASS -BALANCE SPREADSHEET V. 1.2 06/2112001 B.J. and W.M. Schaefer.Estimating Ground -Water Quality Impacts From On -Site Sewage Treatment Systems. 10-11, 1985. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Pages 23-41. See Instructions for Use below. OUTPUT Water BudgetInput Value Default Value Hydraulic Conductivity (f /day) Site-specific Hydraulic Gradient 0.006 Site-specific Miw'ng Zone Thickness (ft) 15 15 Aquifer Width Perpendicular to Flow (ft) 2400 Site-specific 1 1 Parcel Area (acres) Percent of Parcel That Is Impervious (Percent) Current/Acceptable Number of Homes in Parcel Septic Tank Effluent (gallons/d/home) Natural Recharge rate (inches/yr) 117.11 1 3.2 300 Nitrogen Budget (all concentrations represent nitrate nitrogen) Site-specific Site-specific Site-specific 300 0 Site-specific Default Default Yearly Water Budaet Ground Water :Effluent Recharge ITotal Water Volume Volume Ir 4.47E+04 %of Total 97.1 1 32E+03 29 0.00E+00 4.60E+04 _Point of Compliance Nitrate Concentration Goal (mg/I) 11.1 :Avg. Downgradient Nitrate Concentration in GW (mg/I) Current/Acceptable Lot Size (Acres) Upgradient Ground Water Concentration (mg/I) 10.1 L Site-specific 45.0 Default Septic Tank Effluent Concentration (mg/I) 45.0 1 P Denitrification Rate (decimal fraction) 0 1 Nitrate in Natural Recharge (mg/I) 0.3 Yearly Nitrogen Budget 0.0 Mass (m_g1 % of Total /Background GW Nitrate Mass 4.51E+08 1 88.4 'Septic Tank Effluent Nitrate Mass 0.3 Default Default Recharge Nitrate Mass iiiotal Nitrate Mass 5.93E+07 11.6 0.00E+00 5.11E+08 0.0 Instructions for Use Input parameter values appropriate to conditions at the site under consideration are entered in the .: shaded cele on the INPUT side of the spreadsheet These input values form the basis for calculating yearly water and nitroger budgets Default values for selected parameters are provided, as described in the accompanying N -P guidance Selecting values other than these defaults will require providing adequate justification Sources of water and nitroger Include ground water inflow from upgradient, natural recharge on pervious portions of the site, and from septic tank effluent. The total yearly nitrogen mass input is then divided by the total yearly volume of water available to recharge groundwater to arrive at an estimated Average Downgradient Nitrate Concentration in GW (shown in the GUTFUT side of the spreadsheet) As values are input into the : _ .. <= the totals and percent of total for various components of the water and nitrogen budgets are calculated and shown on the :L/ P_ T side of the spreadsheet The Avg. Downgradient Nitrate Concentration in GW is also calculated The Density button allows the calculation of both the Acceptable Number of Homes in the Parcel (shown in the . area) as well as the acceptable lot size Clicking the Density button opens an input box that allows the input of the Point of Compliance Nitrate Concentration Goal The number of homes in the parcel is then adjusted to meet the specified goal.This calculation can be redone iteratively alone with changing other site input parameters to examine the resultant impact on nitrate concentrations Aquifer Width Perpendicular to Flow: For land development projects not completely oriented perpendicular to ground water flow, the site specific aquifer width value is determined using the average property width that is perpendicular to flow Ranges of Hydraulic Conductivity (K) for (feet/day) Silt and sandy silt Silty sands and fine sands Nell -sorted sands and glacial outwash Well -sorted gravel Typical Range of Hydraulic Gradient Unconsolidated Sediments Natural Recharge Rate (NRR) can be estimated from total annual precipitation (TAP) using the equation. NRR (inches/yr) = (TAP)2 ' 0.0046 TAP is input in inches/yr. 0 003 to 03 0.03 to 3 3 to 300 ) 30 to 3000 0 0001 to 0 1 SITE INFORMATION McKay parcel area, width, etc. Site Name Using Sugarberry Parameters (HC=20) Parcel Identification 09/29/2001 Date Pat McGavran Prepared By Disclaimer: Considerable care was exercised in developing this software. However, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality makes no warranty regarding its accuracy and shall not be held liable for any damages resulting from its use IDEQ LEVEL 1 NUTRIENT -PATHOGEN EVALUATION NITROGEN MASS -BALANCE SPREADS!!rP- )g!?1''OO1 This spreadsheet Is based on the mass balance approach documented in: 1985.Bauman, B.J. and W.M. Schaefer.Estimating Ground -Water Quality Impacts From On -Site Sewage Treatment Systems. In Proceedings of 5th Northwest On -Site Wastewater Treatment Shortcourse, September 10-11. 1985. University of Washington. Seattle, WA. Pages 23-41. See Instructions for Use below. INPUT Water Budget Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day) Hydraulic Gradient ixing Zone Thickness (ft) Aquifer Width Perpendicular to Flow (ft) Parcel Area (acres) Percent of Parcel That Is Impervious (Percent) Current/Acceptable Number of Homes in Parcel Septic Tank Effluent (gallons/d/home) Natural Recharge rate (inches/yr) n alue 1 Default Value Site-specific Site-specific 15 2400 S te-s F''OUTPUT Yearly Water Budget Ground Water _ flIuent 15 �techarge 4 i 'fiC otal Water Volume 117.11 1 19.1 300 1 0 Nltroaen Budaet (all concentrations represent nitrate nitrogen) Upgradient Ground Water Concentration (mg/I) Septic Tank Effluent Concentration (mg/I) Denitrification Rate (decimal fraction Nitrate in Natural Recharge (mg/I) 10.1 45.0 0 Site-specific Site-specific Site-specific 300 Site-specific Site-specific 45 0 Default Default Default 0.3 0.3 r Default Default Volume (m31 2.68E+05 7.91E+03 0.00E+00 % of Total 97.1 2.9 0.0 2.76E+05 =boint of Compliance Nitrate Concentration Goal (mg/I) Avg. Downgradient Nitrate Concentration in GW (mg/I) Current/Acceptable Lot Size (Acres) YearIv Nltroaen Budget % of Total Mass (mqj Background GW Nitrate Mass 2.71E+09 88.4 Septic Tank Effluent Nitrate Mass 3.56E+08 11.6 Recharge Nitrate Mass 0.00E+00 0.0 Total Nitrate Mass 3.06E+09 Instructions for Use Input parameter values appropriate to conditions at the site under consideration are entered in the blue shaded cells on the INPUT side of the spreadsheet These input values form the basis for calculating yearly water and nitroger budgets Default values for selected parameters are provided, as described in the accompanying N -P guidance Selecting values other than these defaults will require providing adequate justification Sources of water and nitroger include ground water inflow from upgradient, natural recharge on pervious portions of the site. and from septic tank effluent. The total yearly nitrogen mass input is then divided by the total yearly volume of water available to recharge groundwater to arrive at an estimated Average Downgradient Nitrate Concentration In GW (shown in the OUTPUT side of the spreadsheet) As values are input into the blue shaded :7:=' = the totals and percent of total for various components of the water and nitrogen budgets are calculated and shown on the OUTPUT side of the spreadsheet The Avg. Downgradient Nitrate Concentration In GW is also calculated. The Density button allows the calculation of both the Acceptable Number of Homes in the Parcel (shown in the INPUT area) as well as the acceptable lot size Clicking the Densit} button opens an input box that allows the input of the Point of Compliance Nitrate Concentration Goal The number of homes in the parcel is then adjusted to meet the specified goal This calculation can be redone iteratively along with changing other site input parameters to examine the resultant impact on nitrate concentrations. Aquifer Width Perpendicular to Flow: For land development projects not completely oriented perpendicular to ground water I flow, the site specific aquifer width value is determined using the average property width that is perpendicular to flow Ranges of Hydraulic Conductivity (K) for Unconsolidated Sedlmentaitatural Recharge Rate (NRR) can be (feet/day) estimated from total annual precipitation Silt and sandy silt 0 003 to 0 3 (i.,r) using the equation NRR 2 Silty sands and fine sands 0.03 to 3 (inches/yr) = (TAP) ' 0.0046 Well -sorted sands and glacial outwash 3 to 300 TAP is input in inches/yr. Well -sorted gravel Typical Range of Hydraulic Gradient 30 to 3000 0.0001 to 0 1 SITE INFORMATION McKay Using Sugarberry Parameters (HC=120) 09/29/2001 Pat McGavran Site Name Parcel Identification Date Prepared By Disclaimer: Considerable care was exercised in developing this software. However, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality makes no warranty regarding its accuracy and shall not be held liable for any damages resulting from its use. IDEQ LEVEL 1 NUTRIENT -PATHOGEN EVALUATION NITROGEN MASS -BALANCE SPREADSHEET V. 1.2 06/21/2001 This spreadsheet is based on the mass balance approach documented in: 1985,Bauman, B.J. and W.M. Schaefer.Estimating Ground -Water Quality Impacts From On -Site Sewage Treatment Systems. In Proceedings of 5th Northwest On -Site Wastewater Treatment Shortcourse, September 10-11, 1985. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Pages 23-41. See Instructions for Use below. INPUT Water Budget I Input Value Hydraulic Conductivity (f /day) 100 Hydraulic Gradient 0.004 Mixing Zone Thickness (ft) 15 Aquifer Width Perpendicular to Flow (ft) 2400 Parcel Area (acres) Percent of Parcel That Is Impervious (Percent) Current/Acceptable Number of Homes in Parcel Septic Tank Effluent (gallons/d/home) Natural Recharge rate (inches 117.11 1 10.7 300 Default Value Site-specific Site-specific 15 Site-specific Site-specific Site-specific Site-specific 300 0 Site-specific_ Nltroaen Budaet (all concentrations represent nitrate nitrogen) Upgradient Ground Water Concentration (mg/I) Septic Tank Effluent Concentration (mg/I) Denitrification Rate (decimal fraction) Nitrate in Natural Recharge (mg/I) OUTPUT Yearly Water Budaet Ground Water 'Effluent Default _Recharge Default Volume (m311 % of Total 1 49E+05 97.1 =Total Water Volume it 1$oint of Compliance Nitrate Concentration Goal (mg/I) 4.45E+03 2.9 0.00E+00 1.53E+05 Avg. Downgradient Nitrate Concentration in GW (mg/I) 11.5 11.5 Current/Acceptable Lot Size (Acres) 'Yearly Nitrogen Budaet 0.0 10.5 Site-specific Mass (ma) % of Total Background GW Nitrate Mass 1.56E+09 88.7 45.0 45.0 Default Septic Tank Effluent Nitrate Mass 2.00E+08 11.3 0 0 Default Recharge Nitrate Mass 0.00E+00 0.0 10.5 0.3 Provide Justification Total Nitrate Mass 1.76E+09 Instructions for Use Input parameter values appropriate to conditions at the site under consideration are entered in the blue sr . on the INPUT side of the spreadsheet. These input values form the basis for calculating yearly water and nitroger budgets. Default values for selected parameters are provided. as described in the accompanying N -P guidance Selecting values other than these defaults will require providing adequate justification Sources of water and nitroger include ground water inflow from upgradient, natural recharge on pervious portions of the site, and from septic tank effluent The total yearly nitrogen mass input is then divided by the total yearly volume of water available to recharge groundwater to arnve at an estimated Average Downgradlent Nitrate Concentration In GW (shown in the OUTPUT side of the spreadsheet) As values are input into the blue shaded cells the totals and percent of total for various components of the water and nitrogen budgets are calculated and shown on the OUTPUT side of the spreadsheet. The Avg. Downgradienl Nitrate Concentration In GW is also calculated. The Density button allows the calculation of both the Acceptable Number of Homes in the Parcel (shown in the INPUT area) as well as the acceptable lot size. Clicking the Densit} button opens an input box that allows the input of the Point of Compliance Nitrate Concentration Goal The number of homes in the parcel is then adjusted to meet the specified goal.This calculation can be redone iteratively along with changing other site input parameters to examine the resultant impact on nitrate concentrations Aquifer Width Perpendicular to Flow: For land development projects not completely oriented perpendicular to ground water flow, the site specific aquifer width value is determined using the average property width that is perpendicular to flow Ranges of Hydraulic Conductivity (K) for Unconsolidated Sediments;INatural Recharge Rate (NRR) can be (feeUday) !estimated from total annual precipitation Silt and sandy silt 0 003 to 0 3 r (TAP) using the equation: NRR (inches/yr) = (TAP)2 " 0 0046 TAP is Input in inches/yr. Silty sands and fine sands Well -sorted sands and glacial outwash 0.03 to 3 3 to 300 Well -sorted gravel Typical Range of Hydraulic Gradient 30 to 3000 0.0001 to 0 1 SITE INFORMATION Site Name Parcel Identification Date Prepared By McKay Using Foxtail Parameters 09/29/2001 Pat McGavran Disclaimer. Considerable care was exercised in developing this software. However, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality makes no warranty regarding its accuracy and shall not be held liable for any damages resulting from its use. Mahn Tr ation Department - Office of Highway Safety 16:43 Monday, October 1, 2001 1 idiedeiti;t4fielk) Route: US20 MERID TO LINDER egment code: 002070 Mileposts: 37.258 to 38.268 Ar �je/� ��/j,/ J / '/�� 01/01/1998 - 12/31/2000 • /cry; ;,d 9 ?, f/ • / �/ �VI� �I�r��ir/ � � / f y Accident Listing 2_5YGi'• �'` �� L e F I hZ D Event 1 Event 1 Veh First Second a a a n Mile Driver i Relation Relation Hit Contributing Contributing n Road t t j Accident -/ -6/ post Veh Action r Event 1 To Jct To Rdwy At Circumstance Circumstance e Defs h Srf Light s s Day Hr Date Serial 37.258 Car Go-Strt E Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo 50A None Cldy Dry Day 0 1 Fri 07 03/26/1999 990730008 Car Stop -In -T E Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 6 None N/A 50A 37.258 Semi Turn -Lt N Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 1 None N/A 50A None Clr Dry Day 0 0 Mon 08 04/26/1999 991190027 2 -Ax Go-Strt W Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway T1-9 Disregd-Sgnl N/A 50A 37.258 PuVa Go-Strt W Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 12 Inatten Disregd-Sgnl 50D Unk Clr Dry Day 0 1 Mon 11 06/07/1999 991740021 PuVa Go-Strt S Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 10 None N/A 50D PuVa Stop -In -T E Head -On Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 None N/A 50D 37.258 Car Go-Strt E SS Same Intrsct Rel On Roadway 11 2-Fas-4-Cond N/A 50A None Clr Dry Day 0 1 Fri 16 08/20/1999 992620096 PuVa Chang -Ln E SS Same Intrsct Rel On Roadway 2 Inatten Fail-2-Yld 50A 37.258 PuVa Go-Strt E Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 8 None N/A 50A None Clr Dry Dark 0 0 Sun 22 04/09/2000 001490015 Car Go-Strt S Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 12 Inatten Disregd-Sgnl 50A 37.258 Car Go-Strt W Head-on Tr At Intrsct On Roadway 11 Inatten Fail-2-Yld 50D None Clr Dry Day 0 0 Thu 06 05/18/2000 001930009 Tk/T Turn -Rt W Head-on Tr At Intrsct On Roadway T1-1 None N/A 50D 37.258 2 -Ax Go-Strt W Angle PuVa Go-Strt N Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 9 Disregd-Sgnl N/A 50D None Clr Dry Day 0 0 Tue 09 05/23/2000 002100006 At Intrsct On Roadway 12 None N/A 37.258 Car Go-Strt E Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 2 None N/A PuVa Turn -Rt N Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway Unk None N/A 500 50A None Rain Wet Dark 0 0 Thu 20 10/12/2000 003920021 50A 37.286 Car Stop -In -T W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 6 None N/A 50D None Cldy Dry Dark 0 0 Tue 18 11/30/1999 993860046 Car Stop -In -T W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 6 None N/A 50D Car Go-Strt W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo 50D 37.295 PuVa Stop -In -T W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 6 None N/A 50D N/A Clr Dry Day 0 0 Tue 15 02/17/1998 980400040 PuVa Go-Strt W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo 50D 37.324 PuVa Stop -In -T W Rear -end Nonjunction On Roadway 6 None N/A 50D N/A Clr Dry Day 0 0 Tue 16 08/04/1998 982530048 PuVa Go-Strt W Rear -end Nonjunction On Roadway 12 Follow-2-Clo Inatten 50D 37.334 PuVa Stop -In -T NA Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 6 None N/A 50D N/A Cldy Wet Day 0 2 Thu 18 06/25/1998 981990009 Car Stop -In -T NA Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo 50D 37.334 PuVa Stop -In -T W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 6 None N/A 500 None Clr Dry Day 0 1 Mon 17 09/11/2000 003480047 Car Start -In- W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 Inatten N/A 50D 37.358 Car Go-Strt W Rear -end Nonjunction On Roadway 6 Inatten N/A 500 N/A Rain Wet Day 0 2 Wed 17 01/07/1998 980090024 Car Stop -In -T W Rear -end Nonjunction On Roadway 12 None N/A 50D 37.358 Car Go-Strt W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 Inatten N/A 50D None Clr Dry Day 0 0 Mon 07 12/14/1998 984100025 Car Stop -In -T W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 6 None NIA 50D Idaho Transportation Department - Office of Highway Safety Route: US2O MERID TO LINDER Segment code: 002070 Mileposts: 37.258 to 38.268 01/01/1998 - 12/31/2000 Accident Listing 16:43 Monday, October 1, 2001 2 w L e F I D Event 1 Event 1 Veh First Second a a a n Mile Driver i Relation Relation Hit Contributing Contributing n Road t t j Accident post Veh Action r Event 1 To Jct To Rdwy At Circumstance Circumstance e Defs h Srf Light s s Day Hr Date Serial 37.372 PuVa Go-Strt W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo 50D None Clr Dry Day 0 0 Wed 17 02/02/2000 000740034 PuVa Stop -In -T W Rear -end Intrsct Rel On Roadway 6 None N/A 50D 37.391 Car Turn -Rt W Rear -end Nonjunction On Roadway 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo 50D None Cldy Dry Dark 0 0 Mon 17 12/11/2000 004770038 PuVa Stop -In -T W Rear -end Nonjunction On Roadway 6 None N/A 50D 37.558 PuVa Go-Strt W Rear -end Nonjunction On Roadway 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo 500 Unk Unk Dry Dark 0 1 Thu 17 10/07/1999 993210035 Car Stop -In -T W Rear -end Nonjunction On Roadway 6 None N/A 50D 37.658 PuVa Slowing W Loss Ctrl Intrsct Rel On Roadway 9 2-Fas-4-Cond N/A 50A N/A Cldy Wet Day 0 1 Wed 17 02/04/1998 980280082 PuVa Go-Strt E SS Opposit Intrsct Rel On Roadway 1 None N/A 50A 37.658 Mtr Stop -In -T W Rear -end Nonjunction R -Shoulder 7 None N/A PuVa Go-Strt W Rear -end Nonjunction R -Shoulder 1 Inatten N/A 50D None Cldy Dry Dark 0 1 Fri 20 12/18/1998 984210019 50D 37.768 Car Slowing E Rear -end Dr/ally rel On Roadway 6 None N/A 50A None Cldy Dry Day 0 0 Fri 13 05/05/2000 001810006 PuVa Go-Strt E Rear -end Dr/ally rel On Roadway 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo 50A 38.168 Car Go-Strt W Loss Ctrl Nonjunction On Roadway 12 Inatten Over -Corr OOA None Clr Dry Twilt 0 2 Tue 21 07/13/1999 992130038 38.268 2 -Ax Turn -Rt W Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 12 Inatten 2-Fas-4-Cond 50D N/A Cldy Dry Day 0 0 Thu 14 04/09/1998 981090006 2 -Ax Stop -In -T S Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 11 None N/A 50D 38.268 Car Go-Strt N Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 12 Fail-2-Yld Inatten 50A None Clr Dry Day 0 3 Wed 15 12/02/1998 984000016 PuVa Go-Strt E Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 1 None N/A 50A Car Stop -In -T W Head -On Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 None N/A 50A 38.268 Car Go-Strt N Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 10 Fail-2-Yld N/A PuVa Go-Strt E Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 12 None N/A 50A None Clr Dry Dark 0 2 Wed 19 02/17/1999 990190066 50A 38.268 Car Turn -Lt N Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 10 Pass-Stp-Sgn Fail-2-Yld 50A None Cldy Dry Dark 1 3 Thu 18 02/25/1999 990410048 PuVa Go-Strt E Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 12 None N/A 50A 38.268 PuVa Go-Strt E Head-on Tr At Intrsct On Roadway 1 None N/A 50A None Clr Dry Day 0 0 Wed 19 05/26/1999 991570147 Car Turn -Lt W Head-on Tr At Intrsct On Roadway 5 Fail-2-Yld N/A 50A 38.268 Car Turn -Rt E SameDirTrn At Intrsct On Roadway 2 Inatten Improp-Turn 50A L -Cls Clr Dry Day 0 0 Tue 16 08/29/2000 003350001 Car Go-Strt E SameDirTrn At Intrsct On Roadway 11 None N/A 50A 38.268 2 -Ax Go-Strt E Ran off Rd Nonjunction R -Shoulder 12 Inatten Follow-2-Clo OOA None Clr Dry Day 0 0 Mon 17 10/16/2000 003960041 38.268 Car Turn -Lt N Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 3 Vision -Obs Fail-2-Yld 51D None Cldy Ice Day 0 0 Wed 08 11/15/2000 004320003 Car Go-Strt W Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 11 None N/A 51D PuVa Go-Strt W Rear -end At Intrsct On Roadway 11 None N/A 51D Number of Accidents: 30 .4J . '::......Motet ion Department - Office of Highway Safety Route, US 20 AT MERIDIAN RD segment code: 002070 Mileposts: 38.168 to 38.368 1/01/1998 - 12/31/2000 Accident Listing 0 Event 1 Event 1 Veh Mile Driver i Relation Relation Hit post Veh Action r Event 1 To Jct To Rdwy At 38.168 Car Go-Strt W Loss Ctrl Nonjunction On Roadway 12 38.268 2 -Ax Turn -Rt W Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 12 2 -Ax Stop -In -T S Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 11 38.268 Car Go-Strt N Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 12 PuVa Go-Strt E Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 1 Car Stop -In -T W Head -On Intrsct Rel On Roadway 12 38.268 Car Go-Strt N Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 10 PuVa Go-Strt E Angle At Intrsct On Roadway 12 38.268 Car Turn -Lt N Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 10 PuVa Go-Strt E Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 12 38.268 PuVa Go-Strt E Head-on Tr At Intrsct On Roadway 1 Car Turn -Lt W Head-on Tr At Intrsct On Roadway 5 38.268 Car Turn -Rt E SameDirTrn At Intrsct On Roadway 2 Car Go-Strt E SameDirTrn At Intrsct On Roadway 11 38.268 2 -Ax Go-Strt E Ran off Rd Nonjunction R -Shoulder 12 38.268 Car Turn -Lt N Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 3 Car Go-Strt W Angl Trnin At Intrsct On Roadway 11 PuVa Go-Strt W Rear -end At Intrsct On Roadway 11 First Contributing Circumstance Second Contributing Circumstance Inatten Over -Corr L a n e Road Des w e a t h F I an t j Accident Srf Light s s Day Hr Date 16:39 Monday, October 1, 2001 1 Serial OOA None Clr Dry Twilt 0 2 Tue 21 07/13/1999 992130038 Inatten 2-Fas-4-Cond 500 N/A Cldy Dry Day None N/A 500 Fail-2-Yld None None Fail-2-Yld None Inatten N/A N/A N/A N/A Pass-Stp-Sgn Fail-2-Yld None N/A None Fail-2-Yld N/A N/A 50A None Clr Dry Day 50A 50A O 0 Thu 14 04/09/1998 981090006 O 3 Wed 15 12/02/1998 984000016 50A None Clr Dry Dark 0 2 Wed 19 02/17/1999 990190066 50A 50A None Cldy Dry Dark 1 3 Thu 18 02/25/1999 990410048 50A 50A None Clr Dry Day 50A Inatten Improp-turn 50A L -Cls Clr Dry Day None N/A 50A' Inatten Follow-2-Clo OOA None Clr Dry Day Vision -Obs None None Fail-2-Yld N/A N/A Number of Accidents: 9 51D None Cldy Ice Day 51D 51D 0,0 Wed•19 05/26/1999 991570147 O 0 Tue 16 08/29/2000 003350001 O 0 Mon 17 10/16/2000 003960041 O 0 Wed 08 11/15/2000 004320003 riTy0\ Ziry-VO f3lliokot ��, v 7SL _ '`k \)-,(°\i-(' NI/ ___ ,(Jp