Minutes - 2000 - Planning & Zoning - 08/14/2000 - Regular
ORIGINAL
EAGLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
August 14, 2000
7:00 PM
The Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session on August 14,2000 at .
Chairman Franden presiding.
1.
CALL TO ORDER:
2.
ROLL CALL: The following members were present FRANDEN, BLOOM,
DECKERS. Absent: NORDSTROM. A quorum is present.
Bloom moves to amend the agenda and add Picadilly VillagePUD under public
hearings and continue this item to the August 21, 2000 meeting. Seconded by
Deckers. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES
3.
CONSENT AGENDA:
. Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with
one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless the
Chairman, a Commissioner, member of City Staff, or a citizen requests an
item to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed
from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a
sequence determined by the Rules of Order.
. Any item on the Consent Agenda that contains written recommendations
from the City of Eagle shall be adopted as part of the Planning & Zoning
Commission's Consent Agenda approval motion unless specifically stated
otherwise.
A. Minutes of July 24, 2000.
B. Findin~s and Conclusions for FPUD-2-00 & FP-3-00 - Aries Development.
LLC: Aries Development, LLC, represented by Mike Hormaechea, is
requesting final development plan and final plat approval for Brookwood
Subdivision Phase 3, a 59-lot (45-buildable) residential subdivision. A portion
of Phase 1 is proposed to be replatted and included into this phase. This 31.4-
acre (approx.) phase of Brookwood PUD is located on the northeast comer of
Floating Feather Road and Eagle Road (east of Phase 1 and north of Phase 2).
The site is within the Eagle City Limits.
C. Findin~s and Conclusions for RZ-4-00/PPUD-4-00/CU-6-00/PP-5-00- W &
S Development. Inc.: W & S Development Inc., represented by Lisa and Walt
Wanner, is requesting a rezone from A (Agricultural) to R-2-P (Residential-
two units per acre - PUD) and preliminary development plan, conditional use,
and preliminary plat approval for Eagle Island Ranch Estates Subdivision. The
28.6t-acre, 49-lot (46-buildable) residential subdivision is located on the north
side of the south channel of the Boise River approximately t/2-mile west of
Eagle Road.
D. Findines and Conclusions for RZ-6-00/PPUD-5-00/PP- 7-00/CU- 7-00 -
Sprin~ Creek Associates. LLC: Spring Creek Associates LLC, represented by
Page 1 of 10
K:\P&Z\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\PZ-O8-14-00min.doc
Mark Butler with Land Consultants Inc., is requesting a rezone from R-4
(Residential- four units per acre maximum) to MU-DA-P (Mixed Use - with
Development Agreement-PUD), conditional use, planned unit development
preliminary development plan, and preliminary plat approval for Spring Creek
III. The 4.6-acre, 20-lot (I8-residential, I-commercial, and I-common)
subdivision is located on the northwest comer of Eagle Road and Ranch Drive
extended, at 653 North Eagle Road.
E. Findin2s and Conclusions for RZ-5-00 - Definitive Properties: Definitive
Properties, represented by James Gipson Associates, is requesting a rezone
from R-4 (Residential) to CBD-DA (Central Business District - with
development agreement). The OA5-acre site is located on the south side of
Aikens Road approximately 300-feet east of Eagle Road at 123 East Aikens
Road.
F. Findin2s and Conclusions for RZ-8-00 - Mercy Housin~ Idaho. Inc.: Mercy
Housing Idaho, Inc., represented by Rich Kenny, is requesting a rezone from
R-4 (Residential) to MU-DA-P (Mixed Use - with development agreement-
PUD). The 5.73-acre site is located on the east side of Eagle Road
approximately 1,760-feet north of State Street at 544 North Eagle Road.
G. Findin2s and Conclusions for PPUD-2-00/CU-2-00 - Winco Foods. Inc:
Winco Foods, Inc Shopping Center - Skyland Co (dba Winco Foods),
represented by Billy Ray Strite with BRS Architects, is requesting preliminary
development plan and conditional use approval for a five- pad site retail
shopping center including Winco Foods, Inc. The 14.3-acre site is located at
3101 E. State Street (located on the southwest comer of State Highway 44 and
Horseshoe Bend Road extended).
Deckers wishes to remove items A, B, C from the consent agenda and notes for the
record that item 3G are the revised findings which will be acted on tonight.
Bloom moves to approve items the Consent Agenda as amended. Seconded
byFranden. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES
Deckers moves to correct the minutes of July 24, 2000 to reflect that the
adjournment motion was voted on with a two aye one nay vote. Seconded by
Bloom. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
Deckers moves to continue item B to the end of the agenda so that the minutes of
July 17, 2000 can be reviewed and taken in consideration for approval in
conjunction with 3B. Seconded by Bloom ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
Discussion of item 3B.
Deckers moves to reconsider his previous motion and he moves to approved item
3B Findings and Conclusions for FPUD-2-00 & FP-3-00 with the correction that
on page 3 of 4 the vote reflect a vote of 2 AYE and 1 NAY for application.
Seconded by Bloom. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
Discussion of item 3c.
Deckers moves to approve Findings and Conclusions for RZ-4-00/PPUD-4-00/CU-
6-00/PP-5-00 with the addition that on page 13 of 14 that the second reason for
Page 2 oflO
K:\P&Z\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\PZ-08-14-00min.doc
denial was that the application does not comply with the development agreement
on record for the property specifically with respect to the lake size and the nature
preserve. Seconded by Bloom. Discussion. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
4.
OLD BUSINESS: None
5. NEW BUSINESS:
A. V AC-I-OO - Vacation of access and utility easement of Lot 2. Block 1.
Periwinkle Subdivision - Jack Coon. represented by David Southers: Jack Coon,
represented by David Southers, is requesting City approval of a vacation to the final
plat of Periwinkle Subdivision to remove the sixty (60) foot access and utility easement
located on Lot 2, Block 2. The site is located on the south side of State Street
approximately lOa-feet west of Palmetto Avenue.
Franden introduces the item.
Vaughan presents the staff report.
Bloom moves to approve V AC-I-OO - Vacation of access and utility easement of
Lot 2, Block 1, Periwinkle Subdivision with the staff recommended conditions.
Seconded by Franden. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
B. V AC-3-00 - Vacation to the final plat of Bonita Hills Subdivision No.2 - Glenn
Johnson Homes: Richard and Mary Jean Sims represented by Scott Johnson with
Glenn Johnson Homes, is requesting City approval of a vacation to the final plat of
Bonita Hills Subdivision to remove the drainage easements along the south and west
side lot lines of Lot 8, Block 1. The applicant proposes to utilize an existing storm
water drain, which directs water under the street to the drainage system.
Franden introduces the item.
Vaughan presents the staff report.
Bloom moves to approve V AC-3-00 Vacation to the final plat of Bonita Hills
Subdivision No.2 with the recommended staff conditions with both conditions
suggested in the letter and the conditions verbally stated tonight regarding review
by the City Engineer. Seconded by Deckers. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
6.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. A-3-00/RZ-2-00/CU-4-00/PPUD-3-00/PP-3-00 - Countrvside Estates Planned
Unit Development - Capital Development: Capital Development and Tom Ricks,
represented by Becky Bowcutt and Richard Cook with Briggs Engineering, are
requesting an annexation and rezone from RT (Rural Transition) and A-R (Agricultural-
Residential) to R-I-P and R-2-P (Residential one unit per acre maximum and two units
per acre maximum - PUD), conditional use, planned unit development preliminary
development plan, and preliminary plat approvals for Countryside Estates Planned
Community. The development consists of a 62.73-acre, 112-lot (96-buildable)
residential subdivision. The site is located near the northwest comer of Ballantyne
Lane and State Street. (This item was continued from the July 24 meeting.)
Franden introduces the item.
Page 3 of 10
K:\P&Z\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\PZ-O8-14-00rnin.doc
Joanne Butler incorporates the presentation ofthe July 24th meeting into the record for
tonight. States that the site has been re-noticed, and makes themselves available for
questions and rebuttal to testimony.
Vaughan reviews the staff report.
Franden the public hearing.
Mike Plunkett, 843 Ballantyne Rd. Eagle, Idaho. Questions where the rezoning will
take place. States that Redwood Creek does not have any amenities and neither does
this application but it was still found an acceptable development. Does not feel the
density is too high. States that he is the current owner of this property.
Joe King, lives in Redwood Creek. Would like to see less density. Asks that the
Commission consider two things: listen to what the people have said (during the
comprehensive plan hearings) and approve subdivisions so that they will be compatible
with one another. Would hope that the applicant would have strong reasons for asking
for rezoning of this type of density.
Bill Wooten 2782 W. Conifer Dr. Eagle, Idaho. Has concerns with the density, open
space, increase in traffic. Would like to see consistent treatment of developers
regarding lower density, would like less than 96 buildable lots allowed for this
development.
Rod Huber, lives in Redwood Creek. Expresses concern with traffic. Feels the
development is too dense on the south end ofthe project.
Mary Ann Robinson, lives on Hereford Drive. Expresses concern over traffic and
wanting to maintain a rural atmosphere.
Debbie Reed 1648 Hereford Drive. Feels the development is too dense. It will destroy
the rural feel of west Eagle.
Raymond Denny 1343 Ballantyne Rd. Questions the issue of floodplains and building
over a gas line.
Stan Ray 4544 N. Park Rd. Feels that a development of this type would be a good
combination of larger lots and smaller more manageable lots as well. He supports the
development.
Richard Escott 2543 W. Conifer Dr. Questions the connection of Conifer Drive from
Redwood Creek into this subdivision. The design detail for the connection should
discourage a straight cut through the subdivision but still allows passage.
Bloom notes that letters were received by the following people regarding this
Development and others on the agenda tonight they are in opposition to the
applications. Lisa Szentes 2593 W. Brockton Ct., Del and Suzie Dickerson 1035
Beverly Drive, Kali Dickerson 1035 Beverly Drive, Robert Hamlin 3100 S. Vista
Avenue, Randy Holt 2467 Ballantyne Dr., Michael Long, Debbie Reed 1648 Hereford
Drive, Robert and Jean Schmidt 2156 W. Floating Feather Rd., Doris F. Barrett 2456 N.
Ballantyne Ln., Ward and Wanda Spence 2397 N. Hollybrook Place, and Ed and Pat
Whitfield.
Joann Butler provides rebuttal. Discussion regarding building on the gas line and that it
Page 4 of 10
K:\P&Z\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\PZ-08-14-00min.doc
has been successfully done in the past. Comments on requested zoning, compatibility,
the desire to comply with Eagle's Comprehensive Plan and Eagle City Code.
Franden closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Commission. Questions directed to Ms. Butler regarding
average lot size, floodplain issue, the decision to submit a PPUD application, and open
space calculation. Discussion between Vaughan, Buxton and Commission.
Deckers moves to deny A-3-00/RZ-2-00/CU-4-00/PPUD-3-00/PP-3-00 -
Countryside Estates Planned Unit Development based on the following. A.) The
Commission does not agree with the rezone of the northern portion of the
property to the equivalent R-2 density, and are not aware of any recent zoning
change that exceeds the maximum shown on the Comprehensive Plan land use
map, and do not want to establish such precedent. B.) The Commission does not
feel the P.U.D. density increase in lot size/set back bonuses being requested by the
applicant meet the criteria specified in Eagle City Code 8-6-5-4. The Commission
do not feel that what the applicant is offering in terms of layout, landscaping and
open space is significantly beyond that which may be offered in a non-PUD
development. C.) The Commission does not feel that the development transitions
well to the property to the east. D.) The Commission does not accept the re-routing
of Ballantyne/State Street intersection as a justification for a PUD density increase
bonus. The City has already compromised by awarding the landowner with a
mixed use designation for the land to the south of the re-routed Ballantyne in
exchange for moving the intersection. Items that the Commission would
recommend to the applicant that would help gain approval of this development
are: 1.) The northern portion of the property should be developed to a density not
to exceed not to exceed the maximum allowed in a non-PUD R-l designation. 2.)
The southern portion of the property should be developed to a density not to
exceed the maximum density allowed in a non-PUD R-2 zone designation. 3.) The
boundary describing the northern and southern portion of this property shall be
reflect the transition of land uses shown on the current Comprehensive Plan land
use map. 4.) From a minimum lot size perspective the boundary defining the
northern versus the southern portion of the property of the property could be
blurred in a PUD application as long as the maximum density in recommendations
1 and 2 are not exceeded for each portion of property. 5.) Provide a greater
percentage of open space. 6.) Incorporate traffic calming features in the
connection to Redwood Creek. Seconded by Bloom. ALL AYE...MOTION
CARRIES.
Franden calls a 5-minute break at 9:00 p.m.
B. RZ-7-00 - Rezone from A-R to R-E - Tahoe Development LLC: Tahoe
Development LLC, represented by Mark Butler with Land Consultants Inc., is
requesting approval of a rezone from A-R (Agricultural-Residential - one unit per five
acres) to R-E (Residential Estates - one unit per two acres). The 40-acre site is located
on the west side of Ballantyne Lane approximately Y4-mile north of Floating Feather
Road at 1701 Ballantyne Lane. (This item was continued from the July 24 meeting.)
C. PP-8-00 - Tahoe Rid~e Subdivision - Tahoe Development LLC: Tahoe
Page 5 of 10
K: \P &Z\MINUTES\ Temporary Minutes Work Area \PZ-08-14-00min. doc
Development LLC, represented by Mark Butler with Land Consultants Inc., is
requesting preliminary plat approval for Tahoe Ridge Subdivision, a 40-acre, 19-1ot
residential subdivision located on the west side of Ballantyne Lane approximately Y4-
mile north of Floating Feather Road at 1701 Ballantyne Lane. (This item was continued
from the July 24 meeting.)
Franden introduces the item.
Bloom moves to combine item B &C for the public hearing and notes that separate
motions will be made for each application. Seconded by Deckers. ALL
AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
Mark Butler 222 E. State Street Ste. B Eagle, Idaho. Mr. Butler reviews the
application. Requests modifications to site specific conditions 3, 4 and 5.
Vaughan reviews the staff report.
Franden opens the public hearing.
Greg Johnson 1848 N. Clariman Way. Would rather not have the connection into
Canterbury Subdivision, but if it is a requirement of ACHD that a traffic calming devise
be a requirement so that it does not become a shortcut street. Feels the walking path
across Champagne may be something of a safety hazard. Wants landscaping to be
comparable to neighboring subdivisions. Encourage the adoption of CC&R's to require
vinyl fencing and similar land uses to what Canterbury Subdivision allows.
Jerry Sullivan 1736 N. Claridan Way. Has concerns with water rights and an adequate
supply of water for the ponds and irrigation usage.
Butler rebuts the testimony given regarding pathways, traffic calming devises, and other
Issues.
Bloom notes that letters were received by the following people regarding this
Development and others on the agenda tonight they are in opposition to the
applications. Lisa Szentes 2593 W. Brockton Ct., Del and Suzie Dickerson 1035
Beverly Drive, Kali Dickerson 1035 Beverly Drive, Robert Hamlin 3100 S. Vista
Avenue, Randy Holt 2467 Ballantyne Dr., Michael Long, Debbie Reed 1648 Hereford
Drive, Robert and Jean Schmidt 2156 W. Floating Feather Rd., Doris F. Barrett 2456 N.
Ballantyne Ln., Ward and Wanda Spence 2397 N. Hollybrook Place, and Ed and Pat
Whitfield.
Franden closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Commission.
Deckers moves to approve RZ- 7-00 - Rezone from A-R to R-E. Seconded by
Franden. TWO AYE...ONE NAY (Bloom). MOTION CARRIES.
Deckers moves to approve PP-8-00 - Tahoe Ridge Subdivision with staff site
specific conditions of approval. Adding a condition that the CC&R's for the
development shall be similar to those of Canterbury subdivision. Site specific
condition #3 shall read: Construct a detached meandering 5-foot wide concrete
sidewalk (or an 8-foot wide asphalt pathway if approved by ACHD) along
Ballantyne Lane abutting the site. Site specific condition #4 shall read: Provide a
Page 6 of 10
K:\P&Z\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\PZ-08-14-00min.doc
revised preliminary plat showing the required buffer in accordance with Eagle
City Code 8-2-8- 7-J-4A along the entire eastern portion of the site abutting
Ballantyne Lane either as a common lot or as an easement. Site specific condition
#5 shall read: The applicant shall provide a landscape plan showing berming,
fencing, and planting details within the required buffer area along Ballantyne
Lane abutting this site for review and approval by the Design Review Board prior
to City approval of a final plat. Add site specific condition #8: Construct roadways
with in the subdivision with a four foot straight lane on each side for non-
motorized travel. Seconded by Franden. TWO AYE...ONE NAY
(Bloom)...MOTION CARRIES.
D. ZOA-2-00 - Zonine Ordinance Amendment - U.S. West Wireless: US West
Wireless, represented by Paul Hoffman with W & H Pacific Engineers is proposing to
amend Eagle City Code Title 8 "Zoning", Chapter 2 "Zoning Districts and Maps",
Section 3 "Schedule of District Use Regulations" and Chapter 3 "Performance
Standards", Section 5 "Unique Land Uses", Sub-Section S "Personal Wireless
Facilities..." to allow wireless antennas to be placed on existing light poles exceeding
35-feet high as permitted uses in P-S zoning districts. The current maximum height for
wireless antennas in the P-S zoning district is 35-feet.
Franden introduces the item.
Paul Hoffman 3235 Mountain View Drive Boise, Idaho. Mr. Hoffman presents the
application.
Vaughan reviews the staff report.
Franden opens the public hearing.
Stan Swanson 1010 Park Lane. Would like to convey some health data he has collected
regarding this type of facility. At this time no studies are conclusive regarding them.
Mr. Swanson quotes numerous articles which state that children are more susceptible to
microwave waves, one study also states that children's memories are being affected, and
long term affects are probable. Feels these types of facilities should be kept away from
the schools and the children should be affected.
Buxton reads a section of the Telecommunication Act of 1996 for the Commissions
consideration and requests the applicant respond to her question regarding FCC
compliance.
Mr. Hoffman states that they have not applied for FCC approval but that they will be
sought.
Franden closes the public hearing.
Buxton suggests adding language to the proposed zoning ordinance amendment
language. Suggested language is "Personal wireless facilities allowed under this section
must comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning
radio frequency emissions."
Discussion amongst the Commission.
Bloom moves to approve with staff conditions and adding the following language
Page 7 of 10
K:\P&Z\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\PZ-08-14-00min.doc
"Personal wireless facilities allowed under this section must comply with the
Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning radio frequency
emissions." Seconded by Deckers. ALL AYEoooMOTION CARRIES.
E. A-4-00 & RZ-3-00 - Annexation and Rezone From RT to R-E - FAM
Developers Inc.: FAM Developers Inc., represented by Roylance and Associates P.A.,
is requesting annexation and a rezone from RT (Residential- one unit per five acres)
to R-E (Residential- one unit per two acres). The 15-acre site is located at the
northeast comer of Ballantyne Lane and Floating Feather Road. (This item was
continued from the June 19 meeting.
F. PP-6-00 - Oakley Estates Subdivision - FAM Developers Inc.: FAM Developers
Inc., represented by Roylance and Associates P.A., is requesting preliminary plat
approval for Oakley Estates Subdivision, a 15-acre, 8-lot (7-buildable) residential
subdivision located at the northeast comer of Ballantyne Lane and Floating Feather
Road. (This item was continued from the June 19 meeting.)
Franden introduces the item.
Bloom moves to combine items E & F for the public hearing purposes and notes
that separate motions will be made for each application. Seconded by Deckers.
ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
Vaughan notes that the representative for this application has changed to Stan Ray.
Stan Ray 4544 N. Park Lane Eagle, Idaho presents the application.
Vaughan presents the staff report.
Raymond Denny 1343 Ballantyne Road. Feels that protection in the form a buffering
and a berm would be appropriate. Feels that development needs to be slowed down.
Darrell Fuegate 1571 Ballantyne. Is in favor ofthe yard lights for site lighting. Feels
the Commission should control the density in this area.
Bloom notes that letters were received by the following people regarding this
Development and others on the agenda tonight they are in opposition to the
applications. Lisa Szentes 2593 W. Brockton Ct., Del and Suzie Dickerson 1035
Beverly Drive, Kali Dickerson 1035 Beverly Drive, Robert Hamlin 3100 S. Vista
Avenue, Randy Holt 2467 Ballantyne Dr., Michael Long, Debbie Reed 1648 Hereford
Drive, Robert and Jean Schmidt 2156 W. Floating Feather Rd., Doris F. Barrett 2456 N.
Ballantyne Ln., Ward and Wanda Spence 2397 N. Hollybrook Place, and Ed and Pat
Whitfield.
Stan Ray rebuts testimony.
Franden closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Commission.
Deckers moves to approve A-4-00 & RZ-3-00 - Annexation and Rezone From RT
to R-E. Seconded by Franden. TWO AYEoooONE NAY (Bloom). MOTION
CARRIES.
Deckers moves to continue PP-6-00 - Oakley Estates Subdivision until such time
Page 8 of 10
K: \P &Z\MINUTES\ Temporary Minutes Work Area \PZ-08-14-00min. doc
that the City Engineer can review the issue irrigation for this site and make a
recommendation to the Commission regarding it. Seconded by Bloom.
Discussion. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
G. CU-9-00 - U. S. West Communications Buildine Addition - U.S. West
Communications: U. S. West Communications, represented by Bob Smith with
Hutchison Smith Architects, is requesting conditional use approval to construct a 3,478-
square foot addition to the existing U. S. West Communications building. The site is
located on the southeast comer of Eagle Road and Idaho Street at 62 North Eagle Road.
Franden introduces the item.
Bob Smith, 270 N. 27th St. Boise, Idaho. Mr. Smith presents the application.
Vaughan reviews the staff report.
Franden opens the public hearing.
Franden closes the public hearing.
The applicant confirms that they would not be opposed to casual use of the plaza area
by the general public.
Deckers moves to approve CU-9-00 - U. S. West Communications Building
Addition with the staff recommended site specific conditions of approval.
Seconded by Bloom. ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
Approval of for July 17, 2000.
Deckers moves to approve the minutes of July 17, 2000. Seconded by Bloom.
ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
7. REPORTS:
A. Commission: Bloom expresses her concern regarding the lack of
response from the Meridian School District. Bloom will contact them regarding
this slight to the City of Eagle.
B. City Attorney: None
C. Staff: None
Page 9 of 10
K: \P &Z\MINUTES\ Temporary Minutes Work Area \PZ-08-14-00min.doc
8. ADJOURNMENT: Bloom moved to adjourn at 11 :45 p.m. Seconded
Deckers. ALL AYEoooMOTION CARRIES...
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
,,\.li';~~4"'f!;:...
....'" 0 f E A '?~"'"
~.. -4 '" t G <".~
~.. <'\,.. G~e-N.'t?,.~ ('~,
~:-. ...... .:.,,1.':' 'J!!,."" ("> ",~,
:: (;,,",,30 l'..;J, " "" ';.
:: ¿",,()' .f'<.?,:,-:.
. . ~ ~ ~
.. " <:""0 "'"~ ,
~.'~ ...,:: :, b.
. .... r,
.' . ... ...
H "
\ .' $
".",,;.:,.,...;~ ,..:", }/
S ON K. MOORE
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
JOHN S. FRANDEN
CHAIRMAN
A TRANSCRIBABLE RECORD OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE AT
CITY HALL.
Page 10 of 10
K: \P &Z\MINUTES\ Temporary Minutes Work Area \PZ-O8-14-00min.doc
Wifeless Today Government: Telecommunications Act of 1996
L
n/iq1�o Page 1 ot :3
SEC. 704. FACILITIES SITING; RADIO
FREQUENCY EMISSION STANDARDS.
(a) NATIONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SITING POLICY- Section
332(c) (47 U.S.C. 332(c)) is amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
'(7) PRESERVATION OF LOCAL ZONING AUTHORITY -
'(A) GENERAL AUTHORITY- Except as provided in this
paragraph, nothing in this Act shall limit or affect the
authority of a State or local government or instrumentality
thereof over decisions regarding the placement,
construction, and modification of personal wireless service
facilities.
'(B) LIMITATIONS -
'(i) The regulation of the placement, construction,
and modification of personal wireless service
facilities by any State or local government or
instrumentality thereof --
'(I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of
functionally equivalent services; and
'(II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the
provision of personal wireless services.
'(ii) A State or local government or instrumentality
thereof shall act on any request for authorization to
place, construct, or modify personal wireless service
facilities within a reasonable period of time after the
request is duly filed with such government or
instrumentality, taking into account the nature and
scope of such request.
'(iii) Any decision by a State or local government or
instrumentality thereof to deny a request to place,
construct, or modify personal wireless service
facilities shall be in writing and supported by
substantial evidence contained in a written record.
'(iv) No State or local government or instrumentality
thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and
modification of personal wireless service facilities on
the basis of the environmental effects of radio
frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities
comply with the Commission's regulations concerning
such emissions.
(v) Any person adversely affected by any final
action or failure to act by a State or local government
tile://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\ Telecommunications Act of 1996.htm 04/25/2000
Wireless Today Government: Telecommunications Act of 1996 Page 2 of 3
1.111 guy lulu u u mitluty Luc1 wl U.L41 lb IniAllill1LG1IL
with this subparagraph may, within 30 days after such
action or failure to act, commence an action in any
court of competent jurisdiction. The court shall hear
and decide such action on an expedited basis. Any
person adversely affected by an act or failure to act
by a State or local government or any instrumentality
thereof that is inconsistent with clause (iv) may
petition the Commission for relief
`(C) DEFINITIONS- For purposes of this paragraph --
'(i) the term 'personal wireless services' means
commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless
services, and common carrier wireless exchange access
services;
'(ii) the term 'personal wireless service facilities'
means facilities for the provision of personal wireless
services; and
'(11) the term 'unlicensed wireless service' means
the offering of telecommunications services using duly
authorized devices which do not require individual
licenses, but does not mean the provision of
direct -to -home satellite services (as defined in
section 303(v)).'.
(b) RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS- Within 180 days after the
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall complete action in ET
Docket 93-62 to prescribe and make effective rules regarding the
environmental effects of radio frequency emissions.
(c) AVAILABILITY OF PROPERTY- Within 180 days of the
enactment of
this Act, the President or his designee shall prescribe procedures
by which Federal departments and agencies may make available on
a
fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory basis, property,
rights-of-way, and easements under their control for the placement
of new telecommunications services that are dependent, in whole or
in part, upon the utilization of Federal spectrum rights for the
transmission or reception of such services. These procedures may
establish a presumption that requests for the use of property,
rights-of-way, and easements by duly authorized providers should
be
granted absent unavoidable direct conflict with the department or
agency's mission, or the current or planned use of the property,
rights-of-way, and easements in question. Reasonable fees may be
charged to providers of such telecommunications services for use of
property, rights-of-way, and easements. The Commission shall
provide technical support to States to encourage them to make
property, rights-of-way, and easements under their jurisdiction
available for such purposes.
file://C:1WINDUWSITEMPI Telecommunications Act of 1996.htm 04/25/2000
IMPTAT. •
46,
Q7x/7< f
C. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE PROVISIONS WHICH OF SPECIAL CONCERN
REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL:
• Provisions for "Out -Parcels" are not provided for within Eagle City Code Title 9
"Land Subdivision".
D. DISCUSSION:
• The applicant should provide a revised preliminary plat showing the required 35 -foot
wide buffer along the entire western portion of the site abutting Ballantyne Lane and
along the entire southern portion of the site abutting Floating Feather Road either as a
common lot or as an easement.
• The applicant should provide a landscape plan showing berming, fencing, and planting
details within the required 35 -foot wide buffer area along Ballantyne Lane and Floating
Feather Road abutting this site for review and approval by the Design Review Board prior
to City approval of a final plat.
• The applicant should be required to include the out -parcel (with existing house) located at
the southeast corner of the site as a lot within this subdivision.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval with the site specific conditions of approval and the standard
conditions of approval provided below.
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Comply with the requirements within the City Engineer's letter, date June 19, 2000,
excluding the requirements regarding double frontage lots.
2. Include the out -parcel (with existing house) located at the southeast corner of the site as a lot
within this subdivision.
(4-
Construct
a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk (or an 8 -foot wide asphalt pathway if approved by
ACHD) along Ballantyne Lane abutting the site. �.�,� c.s vs )(
— 10Actc.4.0(g_7j.lL�_
Provide a revised preliminary plat showing the required buffer along the entire
eastern portion of the site abutting Ballantyne Lane either as a common lot or as an easement.
The applicant shall provide a landscape plan showing berming, fencing, and planting details
within the required C5 foot-wi4o- buffer area along Ballantyne Lane abutting this site for
review and approval by the Design Review Board prior to City approval of a final plat.
6. Any stub street which is expected to be extended in the future shall be provided with a sign
generally stating that, "This street is to be extended in the future".
Page 8 of 13
11 EAGLENTTCO14 MOMPlaaciag Dcpi Engle AppricaooaMSUBS120001Tsh c Ridge utdoc
PLANT SCHEDULE
$ SURF COMM. 11411E
NOTES
• s L. • . .
- 3
;
1.
f'..81,P.SL
Si
', ...,....., r.P..4
... ...,, Kr....m-
.J. ..ouL St 44.1.1 riNe.ti;-
4- -.7‘... R‘42,54.gt
.,-.,...-•41.-t...5 !..14i1.:1;• 1 .F:1,4,1..
•
• t.tr,/ -,,BEFRI
• GUI..
.-
6E▪ C . -
VL.1_e_LC .
1111,11....1.1111!11,1,1•1-0,TINc4 Fox !.3.10 O0OTTOt
fltkr.§, 53
EVERGREENS -
SIIII1/11. • 314
.1.9.1.M.1.11(.11,9b1,11 V1.1y1f1,...12 4;9 §_)12.1E110V.I...A13
WILP.KELlig
ORNINIEraiL TREES • 10
SISISISSIS - alts
•
• t. ,P
I •
I 1 IL •
1
I I, I • I iI4I
I 1.11t, FF:in II tr.r
'1
Ifir=11141:11-ACRLCCLIVISTO
ISE ELINYEEEL._ - .
EILliTING11.....-It LOCI..., TO
VIE 1.12.140.T.11
esilT450 1.1.33,3 ro
4E 114.410,411
CEARA Y. Or PO.
75: .
1
• '41
1•11111.1 PATH!
1 11.11.1.11“11111
r
I i
ofic.1.1 E414111/ENRI
•
•
- 1
I 1"•tLi11
11111 1 F.:- L.
1
1 1.11
I -
-'
1
Is I •
1 414.545544 COL.
t
44511.1.4,44 44TEETE
- .141444.01.4411 LOOM" 10
IEC 11040.20
I
. I $. - 1$$
f-
1 ..r......."2.1, .
O 0uj
• Tt
E
LULIJ
0
• <
<
1:
TV:11tE 'tt MITA t !t. V V.!
L./tHinc_APE2LANO____
Propel WM*
00ff7
JTA
JTA
Ows. Ire
PH
B -09 -OO
nt.
LANDSCAPE
L-1
glizgaV
LIJWESI
US WEST Wireless, L.L.C.
Evaluation of Human Exposure to RF Fields
Site BO1-039B
Boise, ID
Engineering and Operations
1371 S. Maple Grove Road
Boise, ID 83709
Evaluation of Human Exposure to RF Fields 02/03/2000
Site B01 -039B
Equations Used
For non -building -mounted facilities, this tool uses the far field equation as
described below:
S '� —Nch xk2 xP,x xGmax XI'vxp
4RIR 2
and in logarithms
rsy (dB)/41
Sff=10 J
where
Sf (dB)=101og(Nch) + 20log(k) + 101og(P„O + 101og(Gmax )
—101og(LP)—101og(p)—101og(47rR2 )
For all equations above,
Nth = number of channels
k = multipath factor
PTX = transmit power
Gmax = maximum gain
Tv = vertical discrimination (at angle of consideration)
p = loss factor
Page 2 of 6 Tower Report (v.1.0)
Evaluation of Human Exposure to RF Fields 02/03/2000
Site B01 -039B
Site Details
Site Number B01 -039B
Site Name Stage Stop
Street Address 23814 S. Orchard Access Rd.
City Boise
State ID
Zip Code 83716
Analysis performed by
Date performed
Mark Prostor
2/3/2000
Facility Type Tower Mount
Tower Type Monopole
Tower Height 105 ft.
Orientation w.r.t. TRUE NORTH 0 deg.
Number of Polygons 5
Polygon 1: Parking Lot 0 ft.
Polygon 2: Ground 0 ft.
Polygon 3: Ground 0 ft.
Polygon 4: Ground 0 ft.
Polygon 5: Ground 0 ft.
General Analysis Parameters
Multipath Factor (k)* 1(1 <_ k <_ 2)
Height of Person 6 ft.
Providers Present
Providers Present I Antenna Prefix
US WEST Wireless I 0
Page 3 of 6 Tower Report (v.1.0)
Evaluation of Human Exposure to RF Fields 02/03/2000
Site B01 -039B
Antenna Summary
Note: Antenna heights are specified as follows: Dish and Panel antennas by centerline; Omni
(whip) antennas by base height.
Provider: US WEST Wireless
ID Antenna Model Type Freq. EIRP Ctr. Azimuth Sector
(MHz) (dBm) (ft.) (deg.)
0-1 RR33-20-00DP Sectored 1967.5 59.79 103.0 135 Alpha - X
0-2 RR33-20-00DP Sectored 1967.5 59.79 103.0 325 Beta - Y
Page 4 of 6 Tower Report (v.1.0)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
Evaluation of Human Exposure to RF Fields 02/03/2000
Site B01 -039B
Spatial Plot
10 20 30 40 50 60
x (ft.)
Legend
n 101.00% MPE III 25.00% MPE 1 50% MPE ■ 0.10% MPE 0.03% MPE
70 80 90 100
Page 5 of 6 Tower Report (v.1.0)
Evaluation of Human Exposure to RF Fields 02/03/2000
Site B01 -039B
Results
MPE Peaks by Elevation
Polygon Elevation (ft.
Parking Lot 0
Ground 0
Ground 0
Ground 0
Ground 0
X (ft.) Y (ft.) MPEu (%) MPEc (%)
19.0 94.0 0.00% 0.00%
19.0 94.0 0.00% 0.00%
19.0 94.0 0.00% 0.00%
19.0 94.0 0.00% 0.00%
19.0 94.0 0.00% 0.00%
Aperture Average MPE Extents
Antenna ID 5% MPEu (ft.) 100% MPEu (ft.) 5% MPEc (ft.) 100% MPEc (ft.)
0-1 75.5 3.8 15.1 0.8
0-2 75.5 3.8 15.1 0.8
Spatial Averages at 1 foot
Antenna ID MPEu (%)
0-1 314.45%
0-2 314.45%
— Full Body Interception
MPEc (%)
62.89%
62.89%
Recommendations
Based on the input parameters, the recommendations are as follows:
1. Consult flowchart [RF Evaluation Process (v. 2.0)] for recommendations.
Page 6 of 6 Tower Report (v.1.0)
U S WEST WIRELESS
RF EXPOSURE (NEPA) CHECKLIST
09/09/99
ver. 3.4
Site Number: B01-0398 Site Location: Stage Stop
RF Engineering has carefully evaluated this site for RF Exposures and has made the following
determination. The following steps as described in Part IV are required to bring the site into
compliance with the FCC RF Exposure Guidelines. 'Excessive RF exposure' is herein defined as
"exposure levels in excess of the General Population/Uncontrolled Limits as defined by the Federal
Communications Commission in O.E.T. Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01." Regulatory Staff at Thornton
may review these recommendations prior to final determination.
I. Site Parameters
1.1 Facility Type Non -Building -Mounted (Tower)
1.2 Colocation? ❑
1.3 Base Station/Repeater
a. Type
• Qualcomm 619 MicroBTS ❑ Other
b. Transmitter Maximum Output Power
❑ 8 W ® Other 16 W
c. No. of CDMA channels
1
d. No. of sectors
2
1.4 Transmit Antenna Type
a. Alpha Sector
® EMS RR33-20-XXDP ❑ Other
b. Beta Sector
® EMS RR33-20-XXDP ❑ Other
c. Gamma Sector
❑ <NONE> n Other
Page 1
U S WEST WIRELESS
RF EXPOSURE (NEPA) CHECKLIST
Site Number: B01 -039B Site Location: Stage Stop
II. US WEST MPE Contribution
09/09/99
ver. 3.4
For Section 2.1 below, if antennas are tower -mounted, use the Near Field Spreadsheet to
determine planar extent of near field. Otherwise, use the Building -Mounted Spreadsheet to
determine actual spatial extent of near field. If equipment configuration does not exceed given
threshold, use dashes (--) to populate boxes.
2.1 The U S WEST contribution to the MPE Limits will be as follows:
a. Less than 100% at the distances specified below from the applicable antenna(s).
Alpha Beta Gamma
MPE Limit Sector Sector Sector
General Population/Uncontrolled 4.0 ft. 4.0 ft. 4.0 ft.
Occupational/Controlled 0.8 ft. 0.8 ft. 0.8 ft.
b. Less than 5% at the distances specified below from the applicable antenna(s).
Alpha Beta Gamma
MPE Limit Sector Sector Sector
General Population/Uncontrolled 80.0 ft. 80.0 ft. 80.0 ft.
Occupational/Controlled 16.0 ft. 16.0 ft. 16.0 ft.
III. Overall RF Exposure
® 3.1 COMPLIANCE BY DEFAULT
The site as designed is excluded from routine evaluation of RF exposure levels and is
therefore IN COMPLIANCE with the U S WEST Wireless RF Exposure Guidelines [RF
Exposure Guidelines as specified in Opinion and Order FCC 97-303 (see O.E.T. Bulletin
65, Edition 97-01)] as defined by the Federal Communications Commission. Any normal
exposures at this site will be less than the Maximum Permissible Exposure as specified by
the FCC.
❑ 3.2 DEMONSTRATED COMPLIANCE
The site as designed has been determined to be IN COMPLIANCE with the U S WEST
Wireless RF Exposure Guidelines [RF Exposure Guidelines as specified in Opinion and
Order FCC 97-303 (see O.E.T. Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01)] as defined by the Federal
Communications Commission. This site DOES NOT REQUIRE mitigation (special
corrective action), and any normal exposures at this site will be less than the Maximum
Permissible Exposure as specified by the FCC.
El 3.3 CONDITIONAL COMPLIANCE
The site as designed has been determined to be IN COMPLIANCE with the U S WEST
Wireless RF Exposure Guidelines [RF Exposure Guidelines as specified in Opinion and
Order FCC 97-303 (see O.E.T. Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01)] as defined by the Federal
Communications Commission. This site DOES REQUIRE mitigation (special corrective
Page 2
U S WEST WIRELESS
RF EXPOSURE (NEPA) CHECKLIST
09/09/99
ver. 3.4
action), and hence any normal exposures at this site will be less than the Maximum
Permissible Exposure as specified by the FCC.
Page 3
U S WEST WIRELESS 09/09/99
RF EXPOSURE (NEPA) CHECKLIST ver. 3.4
Site Number: BOI-039B Site Location: Stage Stop
IV. Mitigation Action
4.1 No Corrective Action Required.
❑ Entire Site ❑ Alpha Sector ❑ Beta Sector ❑ Gamma Sector
4.2 Signage & Notification (Note: Signage MUST be posted prior to energizing the antennas.)
a. Post Blue Notice Sign (Placard #1) at
(STANDARD)
❑ All Entrance(s) to Rooftop ❑ Entrance to Lease Area ❑ Other
b. Post Yellow Caution Sign (Placard #2) near affected TX antennas at following sectors
(NON-STANDARD; approval from Thornton Engineering REQUIRED)
❑ Alpha Sector
❑ Beta Sector ❑ Gamma Sector
c. Post Clear Caution Sign (Sticker #1) near affected TX antennas at following sectors
(STANDARD)
❑ Alpha Sector
❑ Beta Sector ❑ Gamma Sector
d. Post Yellow Caution Sign (Placard #2) at
(NON-STANDARD; approval from Thornton Engineering REQUIRED)
❑ Base of Tower ❑ Entrance to Lease Area ❑ Other
4.3 Physical Barriers (NON-STANDARD; approval from Thornton Engineering REQUIRED).
❑ Erect physical barrier (e.g. chainlink or wood fence) around affected area(s).
Describe
4.4 Other (NON-STANDARD; approval from Thornton Engineering REQUIRED).
❑ Describe
Please contact me if you have any questions or comments in this regard.
Prepared By:
RF Engineer: Yuwu Zhang (U S. WEST Wireless)
Page 4
Date:
Date: 9/16/1999
Del & Susie Dickerson
1035 Beverly Drive
Eagle, Idaho 83616
August 12, 2000
Eagle Planning & Zoning Committee
Eagle City Hall
310 E. State Street
Eagle, Idaho 83616
Dear Planning & Zoning Committee Members,
Po Pl///oo
RECEIVEr el. PILE
IJ3 1 :L00
File. On I W ZE
Route toalia
Countryside Estates, Tahoe Development, & Oakley Development Subdivisions
We are writing to express our opposition to the requests for rezones for the above-
named subdivisions. There are no compelling reasons to approve these requests, but
numerous reasons to refuse them:
• School overcrowding. We have children in middle and high school, both of which
are over capacity. Why contribute to an already bad situation? Let's get on top of
school overcrowding before unnecessarily exacerbating the problem.
• Traffic. Our current road infrastructure is inadequate to accommodate the
developments that are already in place.
• Rural atmosphere. When we built west of Eagle on a five -acre lot, we assumed
that the comprehensive plan would be implemented as written, R-5! However, we
are now bordered on two sides by subdivisions with one -acre parcels. This is not
what we had in mind as "rural". If we wanted to be surrounded by tract houses we
would have built in Meridian! Please enforce the plan as written, and save some
vestige of the rural atmosphere that still exists west of Eagle.
We are relying upon you, as public servants, to ensure that the Eagle Comprehensive
Plan is implemented as written, unless the public interests are better -served by
modifications. This is not one of those occasions!
Yours Truly,
Del Dickerson
Susie Dickerson
Kali Dickerson
1035 Beverly Drive
Eagle, Idaho 83616
August 12, 2000
Eagle Planning & Zoning Committee
Eagle City Hall
310 E. State Street
Eagle, Idaho 83616
Dear Planning & Zoning Committee Members,
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY .')17
Fite: 1 lI
Route to:
Lao
PAZ
Countryside Estates, Tahoe Development, & Oakley Development Subdivisions
I am a 6th grader that will be attending Eagle Middle School this year. I am writing this
letter to express my concern about school overcrowding. By increasing the population
of Eagle, the school will become even more overcrowded. This will result to sharing
lockers, using portable classrooms, and over -sized classes. Last year my brother had
to share a locker, and he wasn't able to wear a coat to school because it wouldn't fit in
his locker! In second grade I was in a portable classroom and believe me
if there are going to be 25-30 students per class, we might even end up sharing desks!
Another problem is that by having 25-30 students in one class, it could effect the
amount they learn each day. It also puts more pressure on the teachers. The halls will
be so crowded that we could be late for class trying to get through the mob.
Please keep the schools in mind, and refuse the rezone request.
Yours Truly,
40 °AU -Mk
Kali Dickerson
ROBERT G. HAMLIN
E-mail: rgh@hamlinsasscr.com
HAMLIN & SASSER, P.A.
A Professional Association of Attorneys
3100 S. VISTA AVENUE, SUITE 200
P.O. BOX 16488
BOISE, IDAHO 83715
August 8, 2000
City of Eagle
Planning and Zoning Department
310 E. State Street
Eagle, ID 83616
Dear members of the Planning and Zoning Department:
t V&
Telephone (208) 344-8474
Facsimile (208) 344-8479
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY .OF F ' C;1..E.
File;
Route to;
i. 3 1
I live in the Kensington Meadows subdivision which is on the southwest corner of
the Beacon Light Rd and Ballantyne Rd. intersection. The subdivision consists of five (5) acre.
parcels. The surrounding area consists of either five (5) acre parcels or larger operating farms and
ranches.
It is my understanding that the planning and zoning department is currently
considering whether to approve two (2) new subdivisions on Ballantyne Rd.,both of which will
consist of two (2) acre lots or less.
The purpose ofthis letter is to strenuously object to the approval ofsuch subdivisions.
The reasons for this position are that the subdivisions will dramatically increase the traffic on
Ballantyne Rd. and onto the State St. bypass. They will also cause overcrowding in the schools and
place an increased demand on the already limited city resources and services. Also, the approval of
high density subdivisions in Eagle will dramatically and rapidly change the character of Eagle and
the surrounding areas. The residents of Eagle and the surrounding areas live where they do because
of the rural environment and the lower density living conditions. If they wanted to live in a high
density, overcrowded, subdivision environment, they would have located in certain neighboring
communities.
There is a much larger issue involved in these decisions than the profit of the
developers. The issue is the recognition and protection of the character and integrity of the city of
Eagle.
City of Eagle
Planning & Zoning Department
August 8, 2000
e 2
I strongly urge you to resist the temptation to allow developers to decide the future
character of our community.
Very truly yours,
Robert G. Hamlin
RGH:sh
0;t46/
73'9// Qhs
(/ ECEIVED & GL ED
ClrY OF
.f+ t cta
f0 -5t -TE t r.ts
13
it7tAl-K-67
d6)4Ckfrii%j Xhi o)/ ferhA:f
CAR PARTS 7a -4<t) O/7/(Ay
WAREHOUSE,
INC. �//�/-Gry /!j'7/'/i /rrt�il`N�( ��/JG� ✓!/-P.l.
onafj_i__(c
4'h -c 446, sur ,htki/f4
/6✓40 ati 4'2tMc/ uq 1A/6d yff)n_4W/r7*
g/cA-e fa•)6-1--&- 4a-oa-6
Aii4AA7- t
bi;ObtAU Im96 G�,.t,tl Q�'il.f„�
Ca&L( 090^`'e6
izafie e A44-) ct- eiitat A4-1-te-
,%tt A.4044-pn
1417 Grove St.
P.O. Box 9306 ://4/ kA/h1j*q •44/'W )A/k 6f144-41)
B'izoeiais-;aso m/111/14Yl 41e/V O�✓o ft#4J J41
114.46*4141‘ .-tea
08/14/2000 16:10 FAX 2084540026
OMNI PURE FILTERCORP
To: Eagle Planning and Zoning Board
From: Michael R. and Fenny Long
Address: 1200 N. Beverly Dr., Eagle
Date: Aug. 14, 2000
Dear Board Members,
.
Pz
rI )1//466
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
4116 1 4 2000
Filo: W•7
Route to:
0
My wife and I arc writing this letter to express our vigorous opposition to the three
rezoning requests that are to be considered tonight. As much as we would like to appear in
person, previous commitments prevent us from doing so. Please accept this letter in leu of
our attendance.
As you can see from our address, all of these potential changes will have a direct affect on
us if they are allowed. Traffic, throughout Eagle, seems to be getting worse each day. Pm
sure the board is well aware of the existing problems where Ballantyne joins State Street.
The proposed changes will only greatly exacerbate the situation.
The primary reason for our move to Eagle, from Meridian, was the rural setting. The
proposed changes, especially the 96 homes slated for "Countryside Estates," will move
Eagle ever closer to becoming another Meridian. While Meridian is a nice, high density
suburban community, it has become clogged with "tract" homes and neighborhoods, just
like the millions that now choke so many of the cities in the West.
Eagle is, and should remain, a beautiful rural community. We chose to buy a home here so
we could raise our children in the lifestyle that a rural setting brings. Jamming nearly 100
homes onto 63 acres is another huge step in the direction of destroying the atmosphere that
makes Eagle so special. This does not even take into consideration the impact that will be
felt by our school system. Again, I'm sure all of you are acutely aware of the crowding
problems that exist at our schools. These proposed changes will only make a difficult
situation worse.
Finally, it makes no sense whatsoever to crowd so many homes into the properties as
proposed. Eagle is not landlocked nor is there any shortage of affordable housing in the
Treasure Valley. Why turn one of the most pleasant communities in the West into another
example of the worst that "suburbia" has to offer?
Thank you for your time and consideration.
08/12/2000 23:39 208-939-4847
Eagle P & Z Committee
Eagle City Hall
310 E. State Street
Eagle, ZD 83616
BEST DRESSED WINDOWS
August 14, 2000
Re: Rezoning of land near Ballantyne and Floating Feather
2
01
RECcIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
AUG 1 4 2000
Filo:
Route to
1 an, writing to express my strong opposition to the rezoning of the land on
Ballantyne between State Street and Floating Feather. We live on 5 acres and
chose to live here because this side of town was zoned low density. To change
the zoning on this large parcel of land (Countryside Estates) is terribly unfair to
all of us who live on the west side of Eagle. I am sure we all purchased our land
with the belief that all future housing would also be on acreage as the city plan
required. 1 am not against growth, but the rezoning request is entirely to dense.
The roads and schools cannot take this additional growth. The Middle School is
already 30.40% over capacity and that does not even take into account all the
new children from the new subdivisions built over the Ammer and the coming
year! The High School is in similar shape. I cannot imagine any reason to
approve this. Developer's request. It is against everything that benefits the people
living in this area.
Sincerely,
1648 Hereford Drive
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
/&J3 1 20p0
File:
actjrZ4it
Route to:
e414 -v
(-r,"1;1-
tiff 1L4- r-
Z41 -41 -r -i -Q-))
fttltUE2A444r Atjaut
'
/ I
8k9/eri)
)v14604:3
yit4-(L3-*/ea44± jpe .4L>;1A,114sz,
ztlx.. an -e? tr-4-611,1_4.2 ±4,4±
-
dprtzLId,
oc.-» wfrtxz tea, .�..�.
cA), , -w_Ax±
aj,r2z,-z,gR
44.
d`'/' ,tiut-t ZJs�.�p"p�,g a. do.M^'x,m+}- c*uz__
ht414-14..tL
v
'iv"Al° 0"—
J/i/Le-
1;-44
614"--14 ANL;)0-161)
/11‘7444._),-
a(""1/1-4-'
0-rit /71.01-47.'
.
JI'LP;L .1-'4/(-) ;41'W aPi2-4j
VtArtAjtj9,,, 1/040-1
,k �"-'
°ZIL 1A -44-D 171# Z2 -14a" A ,t -)P4' 6"6641'4A-ktr
(Ar'°'
kat2.4CDA"
tat5Iyid,
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subiect:A-3-00/RZ-2-00/CU-4-00/PPUD-3-00/PP-3-00 -
Countrvside Estates Planned Unit Development
NAME
August 14, 2000
7:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
ADDRESS TELEPHONE
PRO? CON?
4/E4 ice - kV3 d/efrei-Ce_ � i- -�� 3 ?e.
17 0 Ai. Jtltnsu Vitit,441?37- its.
CS, .1.4/aiti 2- 7/Pc2, ‘(/, &tie ft;X_. id, Afi
ht kr - fe,3 a1/ y
nta.,tea k.c. JttA4;._ /22A cJ G3 g f
7)'Jh P1S /tete" dedord 6/39
Page 1 of 2
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subi ect:RZ-7-00 - Rezone from A -R to R E - Tahoe Development
August 14, 2000
7:00 P.M.
NAME
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
7
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET
Subiect:PP-8-00 Tahoe Ridge Subdivision - Tahoe Development
August 14, 2000
7:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME
ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of 1
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subiect:ZOA-2-00 -Zoning Ordinance Amendment
August 14, 2000
7:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
A t / (0 p/1 ft- 9 3?--(
wEvf,60aa 323 VI' v k- c eA) Ott 5/L. •14 0 X
Page 1 of 1
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subiect:A-4-00 & RZ-3-00 Annexation and Rezone from RT to R -E -
FAM Developers
August 14, 2000
7:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
ex,
O - V i �� \n)� c�C,�Tt1154.1.5 I
-
1 , l 1-2.)aLu Ty/ve ;s; /- »'
Page 1 of 2
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subiect:PP-6-00 Oakley Estate Subdivision
FAM Developers
August 14, 2000
7:00 P.M.
NAME
Oe olio Li 131
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
1 SC 1 5<w_cAurvi k 6/ 77/
Page 1 of 2
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subiect:CU-9-00 US West Communications Building Addition
August 14, 2000
7:00 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
be\)QA `i 1RIo D&Ra, 5'31- F4 8.6
Page 1 of 1