Resolution - 2016 - 16-38 - Adoption Of Ada County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 12/13/2016RESOLUTION NO. 16-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE EAGLE CITY COUNCIL, EAGLE, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE ADA COUNTY MULTI -HAZARD MITIGATION
PLAN
WHEREAS, all of Ada County has exposure to natural hazards that increase the risk to life,
property, environment and the County's economy; and
WHEREAS; pro -active mitigation of known hazards before a disaster event can reduce or
eliminate long-term risk to life and property; and
WHEREAS, The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390) established new
requirements for pre and post disaster hazard mitigation programs; and
WHEREAS; a coalition of Ada County stakeholders with like planning objectives has been
formed to pool resources and create consistent mitigation strategies to be implemented within each
partners identified capabilities, within the Ada County Planning Area; and
WHEREAS, the coalition has completed a planning process that engages the public, assesses
the risk and vulnerability to the impacts of natural hazards, develops a mitigation strategy consistent
with a set of uniform goals and objectives, and creates a plan for implementing, evaluating and
revising this strategy;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EAGLE, IDAHO:
1.) Adopts in its entirety, Volume I and part 1, the City of Eagle jurisdictional annex of part
2, part 3 and the appendices of Volume II of the Ada County Multi -Hazard Mitigation
Plan (ACMHMP).
2.) Will use the adopted and approved portions of the ACMHMP to guide pre and post
disaster mitigation of the hazards identified.
3.) Will coordinate the strategies identified in the ACMHMP with other planning programs
and mechanisms under its jurisdictional authority.
4.) Will continue its support of the Steering Committee and continue to participate in the
Planning Partnership as described by the ACMHMP.
5.) Will help to promote and support the mitigation successes of all ACMHMP Planning
Partners.
This Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval.
Page 1 of 2
K'\COUNCIL\Resolutions\2016\16-38 Resolution Adoption Ada County Mul&Hazard Hazard Mitigation Plan doc
ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Eagle, Idaho, this the 13`h day of December, 2016.
CITY OF EAGLE
Ada County, Idaho
Stan idgeway, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sharon K. Bergmann, City �erk
.••'% OF A
,EC
C rte.•• Q 0 R ,q ••
• •*?
0 CJ �
; •� i
* AL =
g �sY-10
'moi •••t)RP(NtAT i•• `L" •�
�''•.,;�TE OF �
"11111S11,..•.
Page 2 of 2
K ,COUNCUResolunons\2016 16-38 Resolution Adoption Ada County Multi -Hazard Hazard Mitigation Plan doc
Attachment 1
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
Pre -Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (PDM)
FACT SHEET
I. WARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM (HMGP)
What is the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program?
Authorized under Section 404 of the Stafford Act, the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides grants to States and
local governments to implement long-term hazard mitigation measures after a major disaster
declaration. The purpose of the program is to reduce the loss of life and property due to natural
disasters and to enable mitigation measures to be implemented during the immediate recovery from
a disaster.
Who is eligible to apply?
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funding is only available to applicants that reside within a
Presidentially declared disaster area. Eligible applicants are
• State and local governments
• Indian tribes or other tribal organizations
• Certain non-profit organizations
What types of projects can be funded by the HMGP?
HMGP funds may be used to fund projects that will reduce or eliminate the losses from future
disasters. Projects must provide a long-term solution to a problem, for example, elevation of a home
to reduce the risk of flood damages as opposed to buying sandbags and pumps to fight the flood. In
addition, a project's potential savings must be more than the cost of implementing the project.
Funds may be used to protect either public or private property or to purchase property that has been
subjected to, or is in danger of, repetitive damage. Examples of projects include, but are not limited
to:
• Acquisition of real property for willing sellers and demolition or relocation of buildings to
convert the property to open space use
• Retrofitting structures and facilities to minimize damages from high winds, earthquake,
flood, wildfire, or other natural hazards
• Elevation of flood prone structures
• Development and initial implementation of vegetative management programs
• Minor flood control projects that do not duplicate the flood prevention activities of other
Federal agencies
• Localized flood control projects, such as certain ring levees and floodwall systems, that are
designed specifically to protect critical facilities
• Post -disaster building code related activities that support building code officials during the
reconstruction process
What are the minimum project criteria?
There are five issues you must consider when determining the eligibility of a proposed project.
• Does your project conform to your State's Hazard Mitigation Plan?
• Does your project provide a beneficial impact on the disaster area i.e. the State?
• Does your application meet the environmental requirements?
• Does your project solve a problem independently?
• Is your project cost-effective?
II. RE -DISASTER MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM (PDM)
What is the Pre -Disaster Mitigation competitive grant program?
The Pre -Disaster Mitigation (PDM) competitive grant program provides funds to State, Tribal, and
local governments for pre -disaster mitigation planning and projects primarily addressing natural
hazards. Cost -Effective pre -disaster mitigation activities reduce risk to life and property from
natural hazard events before a natural disaster strikes, thus reducing overall risks to the population
and structures, while also reducing reliance on funding from actual disaster declarations. Funds will
be awarded on a competitive basis to successful Applicants for mitigation planning and project
applications intended to make local governments more resistant to the pacts of future natural
disasters.
Who can apply for a PDM competitive grant?
Eligible PDM competitive grant Applicants include State and Territorial emergency management
agencies, or a similar office of the State, District of Columbia, U.S. Virgin Islands, Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and
Federally -recognized Indian Tribal governments.
✓ Eligible Sub -applicants include State agencies; Federally -recognized Indian Tribal
governments; and local governments (including State recognized Indian Tribal governments
and Alaska native villages).
✓ Applicants can apply for PDM competitive grant funds directly to FEMA, while Sub -
applicants must apply for funds through an eligible Applicant.
✓ Private non-profit organizations are not eligible to apply for PDM but may ask the appropriate
local government to submit an application for the proposed activity on their behalf.
What are eligible PDM projects?
Multi -hazard mitigation projects must primarily focus on natural hazards but also may
address hazards caused by non -natural forces. Funding is restricted to a maadmum of
$3M Federal share per project. The following are eligible mitigation projects:
✓ Acquisition or relocation of hazard -prone property for conversion to open space in
perpetuity;
✓ Structural and non-structural retrofitting of existing buildings and facilities (including
designs and feasibility studies when included as part of the construction project) for
wildfire, seismic, wind or flood hazards (e.g., elevation, flood proofing, storm
shutters, hurricane clips);
✓ Minor structural hazard control or protection projects that may include vegetation
management, Stormwater management (e.g., culverts, floodgates, retention basins), or
shoreline/landslide stabilization; and,
✓ Localized flood control projects, such as certain ring levees and floodwall systems,
that are designed specifically to protect critical facilities and that do not constitute a
section of a larger flood control system.
Mitigation Project Requirements
Projects should be technically feasible (see Section XII. Engineering Feasibility) and ready to
implement. Engineering designs for projects must be included in the application to allow FEMA to
assess the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed project. The project cost estimate should
complement the engineering design, including all anticipated costs. FEMA has several formats that it
uses in cost estimating for projects. Additionally, other Federal agencies' approaches to project cost
estimating can be used as long as the method provides for a complete and accurate estimate. FEMA
can provide technical assistance on engineering documentation and cost estimation (see Section
XIII.D. Engineering Feasibility).
Mitigation projects also must meet the following criteria:
1. Be cost-effective and substantially reduce the risk of future damage, hardship, loss, or
suffering resulting from a major disaster, consistent with 44 CFR 206.434(c)(5) and
related guidance, and have a Benefit -Cost Analysis that results in a benefit -cost ratio
of 1.0 or greater (see Section X. Benefit -Cost Analysis). Mitigation projects with a
benefit -cost ratio less than 1.0 will not be considered for the PDM competitive
grant program;
2. Be in conformance with the current FEMA -approved State hazard mitigation plan;
3. Solve a problem independently or constitute a functional portion of a solution where
there is assurance that the project as a whole will be completed, consistent with 44
CFR 206.434(b)(4);
4. Be in conformance with 44 CFR Part 9, Floodplain Management and Protection of
Wetlands, and 44 CFR Part 10, consistent with 44 CFR 206.434(c)(3);
5. Not duplicate benefits available from another source for the same purpose, including
assistance that another Federal agency or program has the primary authority to provide
(see Section VII.C. Duplication of Benefits and Programs);
6. Be located in a community that is participating in the NFIP if they have been identified
through the NFIP as having a Special Flood Hazard Area (a FHBM or FIRM has been
issued). In addition, the community must not be on probation, suspended or withdrawn
from the NFIP; and,
7. Meet the requirements of Federal, State, and local laws.
What are examples of Ineligible PDM Projects?
The following mitigation projects are not eligible for the PDM program:
✓ Major flood control projects such as dikes, levees, floodwalls, seawalls,
groins, jetties, dams, waterway channelization, beach nourishment or re -
nourishment;
✓ Warning systems;
✓ Engineering designs that are not integral to a proposed project;
✓ Feasibility studies that are not integral to a proposed project;
✓ Drainage studies that are not integral to a proposed project;
✓ Generators that are not integral to a proposed project;
✓ Phased or partial projects;
✓ Flood studies or flood mapping; and,
✓ Response and communication equipment.
Attachment 2
1. CITY OF EAGLE
1.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT
Primary Point of Contact
Mike Williams, CFM, Planner III
660 E. Civic Lane
Eagle, ID 83616
Telephone: 208-489-8799
e-mail Address: mwilliams@cityofeagle.org
1.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE
Alternate Point of Contact
Brian Parker, Planner I
660 E. Civic Lane
Eagle, ID 83616
Telephone: 208-489-8799
e-mail Address: bparker@cityofeagle.org
The following is a summary of key information about the jurisdiction and its history:
• Date of Incorporation— May 27, 1971
• Current Population— 25,560 ( COMPASS)
• Population Growth— 4%
• Location and Description— The City of Eagle covers approximately 30 square miles, with elevation
range from 2,566 feet to 3,100 feet. Strategically placed between the Boise foothills and the Boise River,
Eagle has much to offer in the way of walking, horse and bike riding, a state-of-the-art skateboard park,
and ponds and other water amenities. With the intersection of the state's primary north -south highway
(Highway 55) and a major east -west route (Highway 44) located in Eagle, access to and from the
community is efficient and diverse.
• Brief History— Eagle's early history was set in motion when gold was discovered in the Boise Basin in
1862, as well as in other Idaho mountain locations farther north. Many chose to seek their fortune mining,
but a select few came to understand that the mining towns desperately needed the agricultural products
that were fast becoming the mainstay of Boise and its river valley to the west, and they centered their
efforts on those needs.
Climate— Eagle, ID climate is warm during summer when temperatures tend to be in the 70s and very
cold during winter when temperatures tend to be in the 30s. The warmest month of the year is July with
an average maximum temperature of 87.60 degrees Fahrenheit, while the coldest month of the year is
January with an average minimum temperature of 22.00 degrees Fahrenheit. Temperature variations
between night and day tend to be relatively big during summer with a difference that can reach 31 degrees
Fahrenheit, and fairly limited during winter with an average difference of 15 degrees Fahrenheit. The
annual average precipitation at Eagle is 19.20 inches. Rainfall in is fairly evenly distributed throughout
the year. The wettest month of the year is March with an average rainfall of 2.24 Inches.
TETRA TECH
1-1
Report Title City of Eagle
• Governing Body Format— Eagle is governed by a mayor/council form of government, with four elected
council members and an elected mayor. The City Council is responsible for the adoption of this plan, the
mayor is responsible for its implementation.
• Development Trends— Single family housing still is still the most common development, but interest in
multi -family and commercial development is increasing in Eagle.
1.3 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
An assessment of legal and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 1-1. An assessment of fiscal capabilities
is presented in Table 1-2. An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 1-3.
Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 1-4. Classifications
under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 1-5. An assessment of education and
outreach capabilities is presented in Table 1-6.
1-2 TETRA TECH
Report Title City of Eagle
Table 1-1. Le, al and Re ulator Capability_
Yes/No
No
No
Comment:
Environmental Protection
No
No
M No
Comment:
Building Code
Yes No
Yes
Comment: Title 7, Chapter 1, Article A adopts the 2006 International Building
Code (IBC):4Ado tp ed 5/13/2008
W
Zoning Code
Yes No
Yes
Comment: Title 8, Chapters 1 thru 11. Adopted 4/11/2003 � ��
��
No
Subdivisions
_ �� � _ ✓�_
Yes No
4T _ F ry�
No
Comment: Title 9, Chapters, 1 thru 6. Ado ted: 11/15/1983
Climate Change
No
Stormwater Management
_. Yes w No
- No
Comment: Title 9, Chapter 4 (9-4-1-10) includes provisions for drainage. Adopted 1979. *Note-ACHD deploys stormwater
standards as theyeg rtain to roads.N N
Other
Post -Disaster Recovery
Yes/No No
p
No
Comment:
Real Estate Disclosure Yes/No No No
Comment:
Growth Management Yes No No
Comment:
Site Plan Review
Yes/No
No
No
Comment:
Environmental Protection
No
No
M No
Comment:
Flood Damage Prevention
Yes
No
No
Comment: Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, Title 10. Adopted 1979
Emergency Management
Yes/No^
No
No
Comment:
Climate Change
No
No
No
Comment:
Other
Yes/No
No
No
Comment:
General or Comprehensive Plan
Yes
No
Yes
Is the plan equipped to provide linkage to this mitigation plan?Yes/No
Comment: City of Eagle Comprehensive Plan adopted 1/12/16.
Capital Improvement Plan
No
No
No
What types of capital facilities does the plan address?
How often is the plan updated?
Comment:
Floodplain or Watershed Plan Yes/No No No
Comment:
Stormwater Plan No No No
Comment:
Habitat Conservation Plan No No No
Comment:
TETRA TECH -- - -- - - - - - - - -
1-3
Report Title City of Eagle
Economic Development Plan
Yes
No
No
Comment: Economic Development component added as part 0 the Comprehensive Plan
Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service
Shoreline Management Plan ..
No
No
No
Comment:
Comment:
No
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard -Prone Areas
Community Wildfire Protection Plan
Yes/No
No
No
Comment:
Comment:
N/A
Forest Management Plan
Yes/No
No
No 1
Comment:
Comment: Central District Health Department Emergency Operations Plan, 2013
Climate Action Plan
No
No
No
Comment,:.
Other
Yes
No
No
Comment:
Ada County Flood Response Plan. Adopted: January, 2006
Ada County Mass Casualty Incident Plan. Adopted: 12/16/2010
Ada County HAZMAT Response Plan.
Adopted: April 2011 Ada County Wildfire Response Plan. Adopted: May 2010
_
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
Yes/No
No
No
Comment:
Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment
Yes/No
No
No
Comment:
Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service
Yes
Post -Disaster Recovery Plan R
Yes/No
No
No
Comment:
No
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard -Prone Areas
Yes
Continuity of Operations Plan
Yes/No
No
No
Comment:
N/A
Public Health Plan
No
Yes
No
Comment: Central District Health Department Emergency Operations Plan, 2013
-
Table 1-2. Fiscal
Community Development Block Grants
Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding
Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes
Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service
Yes
Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds
Yes
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds
Yes
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds
No
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard -Prone Areas
Yes
State -Sponsored Grant Programs
Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers _
Yes
Other
N/A
1-4
TETRA TECH
Report Title
Table 1-3. Administrative and Technical
City of Eagle
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development
Yes
Eagle Planning and Zoning
and land management practices
Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure
Yes
Eagle Building Department
construction practices
Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards
No
Staff with training in benefit/cost analysis
Yes
Eagle Planning & Zoning
Surveyors
No
Staff capable of making substantial damage estimates
Yes
Can contract for service
Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications
Yes
Can contract for service
Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area
Yes
Can contract for service
Emergency manager
Yes
Ada City -County Emergency Management
Grant writers
Yes
Can contract for service
Table 1-4. National Flood Insurance P
When did the community enter the NFIP? 3/4/1980
When did the Flood Insurance Rate maps become effective? 2/19/2003
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Eagle Planning and Zoning
Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Mike Williams, P&Z, Planner III
• Is this a primary or auxiliary role? Auxilary
Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? Yes
What is the date of adoption of your flood damage prevention ordinance? 6/23/1977
• Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum Exceed
requirements?
• If so, in what ways? Higher Standards
When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance 1/2016
Contact?
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to No
be addressed?
• If so, please state what they are.
Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your Yes
jurisdiction?
• If no, please state why.
Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its Yes
floodplain management program?
• If so, what type of assistance/training is needed? Continuing Education
Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? Yes
• If so, is your jurisdiction seeking to improve its CRS Classification? Yes
How many Flood Insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction? 301
$ 94,563,700
• What is the insurance in force? $ 196,129
• What is the premium in force?
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction? 2
• How many claims were closed without payment/are still open? 0
• What were the total payments for losses? $ 19,226.51
TETRA TECH
1-5
Report Title
Table 1-5. Communitv Classifications
Community Rating System
Yes
6
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule
Yes
4/2
Public Protection
Yes
3/9
Storm Ready
Yes
Participant
Firewise
No
N/A
Table 1-6. Education and Outreach
Do you have a Public Information Officer or Communications Office?
Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development?
Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website?
• If yes, please briefly describe.
Do you utilize social media for hazard mitigation education and
outreach?
• If yes, please briefly describe.
Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues
related to hazard mitigation?
• If yes, please briefly specify.
Do you have any other programs already in place that could be used to
communicate hazard -related information?
Yes, Tammy Gordon)
Yes (Tammy Gordon)
Yes
Floodplain Information
Yes
Ada County & City Social Media
Yes
City of Eagle
5/1/2000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Planning & Zoning, Comprehensive Plan
Yes
• If yes, please briefly describe. Website, email blast, PSA
Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes
• If yes, please briefly describe. Ada County System
1.4 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER PLANNING INITIATIVES
The following describe the jurisdiction's process for integrating the hazard mitigation plan into local planning
mechanisms.
1.4.1 Existing Integration
The following plans and programs currently integrate the goals, risk assessment and/or recommendations of the
hazard mitigation plan:
• Eagle Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 6
• Eagle Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 7
• Eagle Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 11
1.4.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The following plans and programs do not currently integrate the goals, risk assessment and/or recommendations
of the hazard mitigation plan, but provide an opportunity for future integration:
1-6 - - — - -- - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - -- - .. TETRA TECH
Report Title
JURISDICTION -SPECIFIC NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY
Table 1-6 lists all past occurrences of natural hazards within the jurisdiction.
City of Eagle
TETRA TECH
1-7
Report Title City of Eagle
Rain on Snow Flood
2012
N/A
Wildfire
07/28/2010
$7,000,000
Wildland Fire
07/11/2010
N/A
Wildland Fire
08/29/2009
N/A
Severe Storm
01/02/2009
N/A
Wildland Fire
09/18/2008
N/A
Wildland Fire
08/08/2006
N/A
Severe Storm
07/04/2006
N/A
Flood
6/2006
$500,000.00
Flood
6/2006
$100,000.00
Flood
1/1-5/1997
No estimates available
Flood
7/1983
$50,000
JURISDICTION -SPECIFIC VULNERABILITIES
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
Number of FEMA -identified Repetitive -Loss Properties: 0
Number of FEMA -identified Severe -Repetitive -Loss Properties: 0
Number of Repetitive -Loss Properties or Severe -Repetitive -Loss Properties that have been mitigated: 0
Other noted vulnerabilities include:
HAZARD RISK RANKING
Table 1-7 presents the ranking of the hazards of concern.
Table 1-7. Hazard Risk Rank
1
Severe Weather
33
High
2
Earthquake
32
High
3
Flood
24
Medium
4
Wildfire
18
Medium
5
Dam Inundation
18
Medium
6
Landslide
12
Low
7
Drought
9
Low
8
Volcano
6
Low
STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN INITIATIVES
Table 1-8 summarizes the initiatives that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan
and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.
1-8 TETRA TECH
Report Title
Table 1-8 Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
City of Eagle
Action #E-1—Partner with Federal Agencies to install electronic flow
monitoring stations on the North
Channel of the Boise River Eagle Rd Bridge and Dry Creek Drainage at
the Eagle Rd Bridge. Both monitoring
stations shall be capable of feeding data to USGS stream flow web site,
or other applicable collection sources.
Comment:
Action #E-2—Partner with ACRD on bridge replacement of Dry Creek X
Bridge @ Floating Feather, w/o
Eagle Rd Replacement. Replace structure to increase freeboard reduce
restriction on Dry Creek.
Comment:
Action #E-3—Maintain community's compliance and good standing
X
under the National Flood Insurance
program.
Comment: Continuing Program
Action #E-4—Continue to maintain/enhance the City's classification
X
under the Community Rating System
Comment: Continuing Program
Action #E -5 ---Integrate Local Hazard Mitigation Plan into the City of Eagle
X
Comprehensive Plan.
Comment: New Plan in Progress
Action #E-6—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase, or
X
relocation of structures located in
hazard -prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with
properties with exposure to repetitive losses
as a priority.
Comment: Continuing Program
Action #E-7—Consider appropriate higher regulatory standards that
X
prevent or reduce risk to the built
environment from the known hazards of concern.
Comment: Higher standards are always considered
Action #E-8—Consider the formation of a Surface Water Utility district
X
and/or a Capital Improvements
program for drainage, as a method of funding the mitigation of stormwater
impacts created by new development.
Comment: Under Consideration
Action #E-9- -Partner with other appropriate agencies within the planning
X
area, such as Ada County, in the
development of a comprehensive stormwater management plan that will
evaluate the projected impacts of future
development in the watersheds that impact the City of Eagle and make
regional recommendations to mitigate those
impacts.
Comment:
TETRA TECH - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - -
1-9
Report Title
City of Eagle
Action #E-10—Support County -wide initiatives identified in Volume 1. X
Comment: Continuing Program
Action #E -11 --Continue to support the implementation, monitoring. X 7
maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as
defined in Volume 1.
Comment: Continuing Program
Action #E-12—Partner with the County, Eagle Fire District, and West X
Valley Little League to develop a
defensible open space use for the urban wildland interface area near
Horseshoe Bend Road and Floating
Feather Road (Eagle Cycle Park). This use shall strive to mitigate the
impacts of wildfire and stormwater
runoff in a multi -objective, multi -use manner.
Comment: Not economical[ feasible
HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN AND EVALUATION OF
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
Table 1-9 lists the actions that make up the City of Eagle hazard mitigation action plan. Table 1-10 identifies the
priority for each action. Table 1-11 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and the six mitigation
types.
1-10 TETRA TECH
Report Title City of Eagle
Action #E-1—Partner with Federal Agencies to install electronic flow monitoring stations on the North
Channel of the Boise River Eagle Rd Bridge and Dry Creek Drainage at the Eagle Rd Bridge. Both monitoring
stations shall be capable of feeding data to USGS stream flow web site, or other applicable collection sources.
New/Existin Flood 2, 7, 8, 9 City of Eagle, Eagle Medium FMA, PDM, Local Short Term
g Fire, ACCEM, Funding
Federal Partners
Action #E-2—Partner with ACHD on bridge replacement of Dry Creek Bridge @ Floating Feather, w/o
Eagle Rd Replacement. Replace structure to increase freeboard reduce restriction on Dry Creek.
Existing Flood, Earthquake 1,2,3,9,10 ACRD, City of Eagle Medium ACHD General Fund, Short Term
Eagle, HMGP
Action #E-3—Maintain community's compliance and good standing under the National Flood Insurance
program.
New/Existin Flood 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, City of Eagle Low General Fund Short/Ongoi
g 9 ng
Action #E-4—Continue to maintain/enhance the City's classification under the Community Rating System
New/Existin Flood 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, City of Eagle Low General Fund Short/Ongoi
g 9 ng
Action #E-S—Integrate Local Hazard Mitigation Plan into the City of Eagle Comprehensive Plan.
New/Existin All 2,5,6 Eagle Planning & Low General Fund Long Term
g Zoning
Action #E-6—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase, or relocation of structures located in
hazard -prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with properties with exposure to repetitive losses
as a priority.
Existing All 3,8,9 ACCEM, Eagle High FEMA Hazard Long Term
Planning & Zoning Mitigation Grant
Programs, ICC
Action #E-7—Consider appropriate higher regulatory standards that prevent or reduce risk to the built
environment from the known hazards of concern.
New/Existin All 4,6 Eagle Planning & Low City of Eagle Short Term
g Zoning
Action #E-8—Consider the formation of a Surface Water Utility district and/or a Capital Improvements
program for drainage, as a method of funding the mitigation of stormwater impacts created by new development.
New/Existin Flood, Severe 4,6 Public Works High City of Eagle Long Term
g Weather
Action #E-9—Partner with other appropriate agencies within the planning area, such as Ada County, in the
development of a comprehensive stormwater management plan that will evaluate the projected impacts of future
development in the watersheds that impact the City of Eagle and make regional recommendations to mitigate those
impacts.
New/Existin Flood, Severe 4,6 Public Works High City of Eagle Long Term
g Weather
Action #E-10—Support County -wide initiatives identified in Volume 1.
New/Existin All All Eagle, ACCEM Low City of Eagle Short/Ongoi
g ng
Action #E-11—Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as
defined in Volume 1.
TETRA TECH
1-11
Report Title
City of Eagle
New/Existin All All ACCEM, City of Low City of Eagle, FEMA Short/Ongoi
g Eagle Mitigation Grant ng
Funding
Table 1-10. M
Schedule
E-1
2, 7, 8, 9
High
High
Yes
Yes
No
Medium
High
E-2
1,23,930
High
Medium
Yes
Yes
No
High
High
E-3
2, 3, 4, 6, 8,
Medium
Low
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
9
E-9, E-10, E-11
Wildfire
E-4
2, 3, 4, 6, 8,
Medium
Low
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
Dam Inundation
9
E-2, E-4, E-6
E-4, E-10 E-4
E-1, E-4, E-10 E-2, E-4, E-8
E-7, E-9, E-10,
E-5
2,5,6
High
Low
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
E-6
3,89
High
High
Yes
Yes
No
Medium
High
E-7
4,6
High
Low
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
E-8
4,6
High
High
Yes
No
No
Medium
Low
E-9
4,6
High
High
Yes
No
No
Medium
Low
E-10
All
High
Low
Yes
No
Yes
High
Low
E-11
All
Low
Low
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Low
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.
Table 1-11. Ana
Severe Weather
E-5, E-7, E-9,
E-6
E-10
E-10 I E-8
E-10, E-11
Earthquake
E-5, E-7, E-9,
E-6
E-10
E-10
E -10,E-11
Flood
E-1, E-3,
E-2, E-3, E-4, E-6
E-3, E-4, E-10 E-4
E-1, E-3, E-4, E-10 E-2, E-4, E-8
E -4,E-5, E-7,
E-9, E-10, E-11
Wildfire
E-5, E-7, E-9,
E-6
E-10
E-10
E -10,E-11
Dam Inundation
E-1, E-4, E-5,
E-2, E-4, E-6
E-4, E-10 E-4
E-1, E-4, E-10 E-2, E-4, E-8
E-7, E-9, E-10,
E-11
Landslide
E-5, E-7, E-9,
E-6
E-10
E-10
E -10,E-11
1-12 - -- - - - TETRA TECH
Report Title
City of Eagle
Volcano E-5, E-7, E-9, E-6 E-10 E-10
E-]0, E-11
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types.
FUTURE NEEDS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND RISK/VULNERABILITY
• Develop a better understanding of landslide hazards in the Eagle Foothills
• Develop a mitigation strategy and building standards for the Eagle Foothills
TETRA TECH
1-13