Minutes - 2020 - City Council - 08/25/2020 - RegularEAGLE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES
August 25, 2020
INVOCATION:
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL: BAUN, GOLD, PITTMAN, PIKE.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
4. PRESENTATION:
A. Boise Water Treatment Plant Farmers Union Canal Discharee Presentation: Eagle
residents Shelly Brock and Richard Llewellyn will present.
Shelly Brock, 8770 E. Chaparral Road. Brock introduces Dr. Richard Llewellyn with North West
Neighborhood Association President. Dr. Richard Llewellyn is a Biochemist and provides a
PowerPoint presentation regarding the Boise Water Treatment Plant discharge into the Farmers
Union Canal and discusses the hazards that come along with this.
Brock conveys what she has heard from new residents especially those from California, who are
upset about this proposal. From their past experience, they have had their water poisoned, beaches
closed and have lived through this before. She urges Council to send a letter within the next week
and have a representative show up at their comment period on the September 156 Council meeting
demanding the investigate their original plan. This plan was hatched under the previous
administration and the new administration has the chance to overturn this. Second, consult with an
attorney who can help Council understand the liabilities. Last, recommend consult a hydrologist.
Finally, put a call out to all members in the public to submit letters to Boise City Council and show
up to testify.
5. REPORTS:
A. Mayor and Council Reports: None
B. City Hall Department Supervisor Reports: None
C. City Attorney Report: None
6. PUBLIC COMMENT 1: The Eagle City Council is taking remote public comment via
Webex. Meeting login instructions are posted on https://www.citvofeagle.or./1698/Virtual-
Meetings. If you just want to watch the meeting, without giving comment, please watch our
livestream at https://www.citvofeagle.org/305/Citv-Agendas-Videos.
This time is reserved for the public to address their elected officials regarding concerns or comments
they would like to provide to the City Council regarding subjects not on the agenda. At times, the City
Council may seek comments/opinions regarding specific City matters during this allotted time. This is
not the time slot to give formal testimony on a public hearing matter, land use application, or comment
on a pending application or proposal. Out of courtesy for all who wish to speak, the City Council
requests each speaker limit their comments to three (3) minutes.
Mayor Pierce opens the public comment.
Elizabeth, 1351 N. Mansfield Place, Eagle. She is opposed to the effluent water. She does not want
these chemicals in the soil or ground water and urges Council to take the actions Ms. Brock has
requested.
Micky Pingree, 7015 Goodale Trail Lane, Eagle. He is representing the M3 Hansen HOA. The
presentation was well done, and it is hard to argue with someone who has a PHD. There needs to
Page 1
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-25-20min.docx
be more alternatives to be considered. He is a born and raised Idaho native. This contradicts the
Eagle lifestyle. He is strongly opposed to this idea of the canal water being effluent to fill it and
agrees with the previous speakers actions they advised on.
Jane Rohling, 582 Palmetto Drive, Eagle Idaho. She would like to provide her comments regarding
the new location of the museum. It is a terrible location and is not aesthetically pleasing and may
be a safety hazard. There have been two different conversations on Nextdoor regarding this matter.
The Council made this decision so late in the game and did not give the public the opportunity to
participate and provide comments. She hopes that the Council will reconsider and not do any further
work. She provides the Council a poll that was done on Nextdoor.
Rick Gilmore, 6266 W. Piaffe, Eagle. Mr. Gillmore is against the canal discharge but suggests that
more data is looked at before making a decision on the matter.
Steve Bender, 1235 N. Seven Oaks, Eagle, Idaho. He utilizes Eagle Water Company, but Boise can
keep their stuff to themselves. He has heard they want to take this approach because it is less
regulatory. We need good hard simple data that says this is what could happen if it goes through.
He would like the City Council to consider a Resolution before the 15'1' to submit to Boise City that
all of Eagle is against it. This is a critical issue and please take action.
7. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE AGENDA:
A. City Staff requests.
B. Mayor or City Council requests.
Mayor Pierce introduces the item.
There are no requested additions, deletions, or modifications to the agenda.
8. ALL CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ACTION ITEMS: CONSENT AGENDA:
• Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one motion. There will
be no separate discussion on these items unless the Mayor, a Councilmember, member of City Staff,
or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed
from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the
City Council.
• Any item on the Consent Agenda which contains written Conditions of Approval from the City of
Eagle City Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission, or Design Review Board shall be adopted as part
of the City Council's Consent Agenda approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Claims against the City.
B. Minutes of July 28, 2020. (TEO)
C. Minutes of August 4, 2020 (TEO)
D. Minutes of August 6, 2020 (SH)
E. Minutes of August 11, 2020. (TEO)
F. Contract for grant writing services between the City of Eagle and Ed Sloan: (JP)
G. DR-48-05 MOD — Building Addition to a Government Office Building for Eagle
City Hall — City of Eagle: The City of Eagle, represented by Christine Aikens with
BRS Architects, is requesting design review approval to construct a 10,603-square foot
addition to the existing government office building (Eagle City Hall). The 1.23-acre
site is located on the north side of East Civic Lane between the US Post Office and
Eagle Public Library, approximately 250-feet north of East State Street at 660 East
Civic Lane (Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, of Aquila Subdivision). (BAW)
H. Final Order for the Denial of AA-02-20 — Anneal of Zoning Administrator's
Decision regarding determination of development rights — Kittric Guest: Kittric
Guest is appealing the Zoning Administrator's decision regarding the determination of
development rights for the property located at 65 East Idaho Street. The site is located
on the south side of East Idaho Street approximately 135-feet east of Eagle Road.
(WEV)
Page 2
K:\000NCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-25-20min.doex
I. Ewa le Sewer District Waiver Request for Water Permit Fees: Eagle Sewer District
has requested a waiver of the $3,495 in fees associated with a water permit for their lift
station project at 4955 W Old Valley Rd. The Water Department requests that the
Sewer District still pay for the actual cost of the meter, $358.82. (KR)
Mayor Pierce introduces the Consent agenda.
Pittman requests to move item 8G and Pike requests to move item 8I.
Pittman requests approving the consent agenda A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H. Seconded by Gold.
Baun AYE; Gold AYE; Pittman AYE; Pike AYE. ALL AYE... MOTION CARRIES.
G. DR-48-05 MOD — Building Addition to a Government Office Building for Eagle City
Hall — City of Eagle:
Pittman states that he still does not feel that this is the best option for the community center and
requests it be on the record. He will be voting in favor because the City does need this, but requests
it gets done as soon as possible so things can get going again and give the residents what they
deserve.
Gold requests that they speak to the process with coming up with this design.
Public Works Director Eric Ziegenfuss gives an overview of how they came up with the design and
concept.
Discussion amongst Public Works Director and Council.
Gold echoes Councilman Pittman's comments. She is not opposed to the expansion. It is important
we get additional space and has concerns with the parking spaces and drop off location. The
Museum is being placed where it conflicts with the small-town character. Can you report on the
parking agreement with adjacent businesses? Gold feels the item should be tabled to get more
information and to allow for public input.
Ziegenfuss we are in the process of working with the surrounding property owners.
Gold would like to see this item be tabled to get more information.
Pike believes that there has not been accurate information regarding the dimensions on the museum.
City Attorney requests that Pike speak specifically to the expansion.
Baun makes a motion to approve item 8G, DR-48-05 MOD — Building Addition to a
Government Office Building for Eagle City Hall. Seconded by Pike. Discussion. Baun AYE;
Gold NAY; Pittman NAY; Pike AYE; Pierce AYE. MOTION CARRIES.
I. Eagle Sewer District Waiver Request for Water Permit Fees:
Pike pulled this item because he was wanting more information, he has since had time to review
the documentation staff had provided in the packet. He has no further questions.
Pike moves to approve item 8I Eagle Sewer District Waiver Request for Water Permit Fees.
Seconded by Baun. Baun AYE; Gold AYE; Pittman AYE; Pike AYE. MOTION CARRIES.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None.
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Public hearings will not begin prior to 6:00 p.m. The Eagle City
Council is taking remote public testimony via Webex. Meeting login instructions are posted
on httas://www.citvofeagle.org/1698/Virtual-Meetings. If you just want to watch the
meeting, without giving testimony, please watch our livestream at
https://www.citvofeaale.ore/305/City-Agendas-Videos.
• Public Hearings are legally noticed hearings required by state law. The public may provide formal
testimony regarding the application or issue before the City Council. This testimony will become
part of the hearing record for that application or matter.
♦ Disclosure of ex parte and/or conflict of interest.
Page 3
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-25-20min.docx
A. ACTION ITEM. CU-03-20 - Senior Assisted Living Facility (aka Nursing/Convalescent
Home) and a Waiver Pursuant to Idaho Code 67-6512(f) - Rick Bennett: Rick Bennett,
represented by Caroline Moore with BrightStar Care, is requesting conditional use permit
approval for a 10-bed nursing/convalescent home. The applicant is also requesting
conditional use permit approval of a waiver, [in accordance with Idaho Code §67-6512(f)],
of Eagle City Code Section 8-3-2 (F), (Requirement for facility to be located adjacent to
an arterial or collector roadway). The .51-acre site (Lot 29, Block 10 Senora Creek
Subdivision No. 3) is located on the south side of West Prickly Pear Drive approximately
120-feet west of the intersection of North Park Lane and West Prickly Pear Drive at 4073
West Prickly Pear Drive. (DCL)
Mayor Pierce introduces the item.
Planner III, Mike Williams expresses that the applicant requests this item be continued to the
September 8`" City Council meeting.
Baun makes a motion to move CU-03-20 - Senior Assisted Living Facility (aka
Nursing/Convalescent Home) and a Waiver Pursuant to Idaho Code 67-6512(f) to the
September 8, 2020 City Council meeting. Seconded by Pittman. ALL AYE...MOTION
CARRIES.
B. ACTION ITEM.- VAC-01-20 — Vacation to the final plat of Coast to Coast Subdivision
— Andrew Poe: Andrew Poe with T-O Engineers, is requesting to vacate the rear yard
irrigation and public utility easement located within Lot 5, Block 1, Coast to Coast
Subdivision. The .886-acre site is located on the south side of West Laguna Shore Drive
approximately 330-feet southeast of the intersection of East Riversedge Drive and East
Laguna Shore Drive at 311 East Laguna Shore Drive. (MJW)
Mayor Pierce introduces the item.
Dave Sterling with T-O Engineers and reviews the application.
Planner III, Williams reviews the staff report and site specific and standard conditions of approval.
Mayor Pierce opens the public hearing.
No public comment.
Mayor Pierce closes the public hearing.
Pittman moves to approve VAC-01-20 — Vacation to the final plat of Coast to Coast
Subdivision. Seconded by Baun. ALL AYE... MOTION CARRIES.
C. ACTION ITEM: CU-09-19/PPUD-06-19/PP-09-19 — Snoqualmie Falls Subdivision No.
15 — Red Butte, LLC: Red Butte, LLC, represented by David Sterling, P.E., with T-O
Engineers, is requesting conditional use permit, preliminary development plan, and
preliminary plat approvals for Snoqualmie Falls Subdivision No. 15, a 94-lot (77-buildable,
17-common) residential planned unit development. A portion of the site (approximately
33-acres) is located at the southeast corner of North Palmer Lane and West Floating Feather
Road. The remaining portion of the site (approximately 9.85-acres) is located on the north
side of West Floating Feather Road approximately 790-feet west of the intersection of
North Arena Avenue and West Floating Feather Road. (MJW) This item was continued
from the July 28, 2020 City Council meeting.
Page 4
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08.25-20rnin.docx
Mayor Pierce introduces the item.
Dave Sterling with Sterling Engineers reviews the application and stands for questions.
Pike is concerned that they are trying to squeeze in two lots and is not in favor. Pittman asks if this
project will trigger the redesign of Floating Feather. General discussion.
Brian McCall, West Valley High, Eagle, Idaho. Speaks about condition #13 and states that the
applicant will make a monetary contribution to ITD. He provides details regarding this matter and
requests that P&Z condition #13 add language that states, "if such agreement can be reached."
Planner III, Williams reviews the staff report and site specific and standard conditions of approval.
City Attorney Villegas reads Idaho's Local Planning Act provisions for a Conditional Use permit
statue. He also reads the definition of a public facility under Idaho Impact fee Act. Per the statue,
the City can require this.
Mayor Pierce opens the public hearing.
Kevin Platts, 2351 N. Luge Ave. Mr. Platts is representing the HOA and requesting he relinquish
time from others in the audience. He reviews a PowerPoint presentation and requests a natural creek
remain the way it is.
Roger Foster, 1864 N. Heirloom Place, Eagle. Mr. Foster is encouraging continuity in that area.
Steve Bender, 1235 N. Sevenoaks Place. Mr. Bender states that the City needs to put a stop on
exception after exception. He agrees that the two lots should go away and stay as a natural habitat.
His other concern is on page 3 regarding the minimum lot size. The Council should not grant the
exception to lot width and keep Developers to the Eagle standards.
Sterling provides a rebuttal.
Discussion amongst the Council and Sterling.
Mayor Pierce closes the public hearing.
Discussion with Planner Williams and Council regarding the open space and lot sizes.
General discussion amongst the Council.
Baun makes a motion to approve action item 10C CU-09-19/PPUD-06-19/PP-09-19 —
Snoqualmie Falls Subdivision No. 15 with keeping in place site specific condition #11, 13, 24,
25 making modification on #25 to increase to four lots instead of 3 and site specific condition
#9 provide a revised preliminary plat showing the removal of the driveway between lot 7 and
lot 8 block 1. And on the Wildlife habitat, potentially work with the City and other user
groups on doing a cooperative project of restoration rehab in that area. Seconded by Gold.
ALL AYE... MOTION CARRIES.
Mayor Pierce calls a 5-minute break at 8:07 p.m.
D. ACTION ITEM: A-06-19/RZ-12-19/CU-08-19/PPUD-05-19/PP-08-19 — Rene Place
Planned Unit Development — MCG-Sterling, LLC: MCG-Sterling, LLC, represented by
Becky McKay, with Engineering Solutions, LLP, is requesting annexation, rezone from R-
3 (Residential) and RUT (Rural -Urban Transition — Ada County designation) to R-5-DA-
Page 5
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-25-20min.docx
P (Residential with a development agreement — PUD), conditional use permit, preliminary
development plan, and preliminary plat approvals for Rene Place Subdivision, an 89-lot
(80-buildalble, 7-common, 2-non-buildable) residential planned unit development. The
18.51-acre site is located at the northeast corner of North Dicky Drive and North Rene
Place at 500 North Rene Place. (MJW)
Becky McKay,1029 N Rosario, Meridian. McKay with Engineering Solutions and provides an
overview of the application.
General discussion amongst that applicant and Council.
Planner III, Williams reviews the staff report and site specific and standard conditions of approval.
Mayor Pierce opens the public hearing.
Dave Beggrow, 2062 Old Hill Road. He does not have a problem with the subdivision but is
requesting a stub street be put in. He is the owner of Eagle Hills Golf Course and at some point, the
property may be developed and should be planned for the future.
Ryan Kunz, 725 W. Floating Feather Road. He requests that the Council consider not providing
variances on setbacks and has concerns with having too many two stories. It should be evenly
distributed of single story and two story.
McKay provides a rebuttal.
Mayor Pierce closes the public hearing.
General discussion amongst the Council.
Planner Williams requests adding two site specific conditions of approval. 1, address the dedication
to the pathways, as part of that dedication, that recorded easement be provided and recorded and
that recorded easement be referenced as a plat note. 2, provide a revised preliminary plat and
preliminary development plan showing that all the amenities within lot 1 block 4 are open and
available to the public in a plat note.
Baun requests having the PPRC recommendations in the packet.
General discussion amongst the Council.
Baun makes a motion to approve A-06-19/RZ-12-19/CU-08-19/PPUD-05-19/PP-08-19 — Rene
Place Planned Unit Development with the following conditions of approval to #7 the setbacks
could be variable setbacks as recommended by the applicant on no more than 35 lots.
Condition #25, the two narrow Tots along the golf course will be limited to single story.
Condition #26, no more than 55 buildable lots prior to construction of the secondary access
egress point. Condition #27, dedicated pathways with recorded easements reference on the
final plat per staff recommendation. #28 Same thing with the open space and amenities within
the development per staff recommendation. Add condition #16 and not doing a stub street to
the golf course. Seconded by Pittman. Discussion. Baun amends the motion, condition #7, to
include the center lots as part of the 35. Seconded by Pittman. Discussion. Baun amends the
motion to have staff identify the lots called out by lot and block. Seconded by Pittman.
Discussion. ALL AYE... MOTION CARRIES.
Mayor calls a 5-minute break at 9:52 p.m.
Page 6
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-25-20min.docx
E. ACTION ITEM• RZ-12-08 MOD3 — Modification to Development Agreement —
Restored Community Church: Pastor Ben Harris, with the Restored Community Church,
is requesting a development agreement modification to the rezone development agreement
associated with the previously approved Restored Community Church. The request is to
modify the site plan identified in the previously approved Condition of Development 3.3
to add a 2800-square foot modular building intended to be used for church kids on Sundays
and a preschool to serve the community Monday through Friday. The 5.52-acre site is
located on the south side of West Floating Feather Road approximately 1000-feet east of
North Park Lane at 3633 West Floating Feather Road. (DCL)
Mayor Pierce introduces the item.
Ben Harris is the Senior Pastor at Restored Community Church and reviews that application.
Planner 11, Denise Lauerman reviews the staff report and site specific and standard conditions of
approval.
Mayor Pierce opens the public hearing.
No one in the chooses to testify.
Mayor Pierce closes the public hearing.
Pitman moves to approve RZ-12-08 MOD3 — Modification to Development Agreement —
Restored Community Church. Seconded by Pike. ALL AYE... MOTION CARRIES.
F. ACTION ITEMCPA-02-20 — Comprehensive Plan Amendment — City of Eagle: City
Initiated Comprehensive plan text amendment to the 2017 Eagle is HOME Plan, Chapter
4: Utilities, Facilities and Services section to include language regarding the adoption of
capital improvements plans to establish minimum level of services standards for police and
fire protection impact fees. (NBS)
Planner III, Nichole Baird Spencer reviews the application.
General discussion amongst the Commission and Baird Spencer.
No one was here to testify.
Pittman moves to approve CPA-02-20 — Comprehensive Plan Amendment — City of Eagle
effective October 1, 2020. Seconded by Bann. ALL AYE... MOTION CARRIES.
11. NEW BUSINESS:
A. ACTION ITEM: EXT-08-20 — Final Plat Extension of Time for Bruneel Subdivision —
Steve Bruneel: Steve Bruneel, represented by Tamara Thompson with the Land Group,
Inc., is requesting a one (1) year extension of time for the final plat for Bruneel Subdivision,
a 7-lot (4-buildable, 3-non-buildable), residential subdivision. The 39-acre site is located
on the northeast corner of West Homer Road and North Gooder John Lane at 4952 North
Gooder John Lane. (DCL)
Mayor Pierce introduces the item.
Tamara Thompson with the Land Group reviews the application.
Planner II Lauerman provides an overview of the application.
Page 7
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-25-20min.docx
Mayor opens the public hearing.
No one to testify.
Mayor pierce closes the public hearing.
General discussion amongst the Council and applicant.
Gold makes a motion to approve EXT-08-20 of one full year. No Second. Motion dies.
Pittman makes a motion to extend EXT-08-20 to 6 months as stated by staff and have the DA
signed by the 27'h. Seconded by Bann. ALL AYE... MOTION CARRIES.
B. ACTION ITEM: Resolution No. 20-13: A resolution of the Eagle City Council to vacate
the twelve -foot wide irrigation and public utility easement located within the rear yard of
Lot 5, Block 1, Coast to Coast Subdivision, as shown on the attachments hereto; and
providing an effective date. (MJW)
Planner Williams reviews the application.
Pittman moves to approve Resolution No. 20-13: to vacate the twelve -foot wide irrigation and
public utility easement located within the rear yard of Lot 5, Block 1, Coast to Coast
Subdivision, as shown on the attachments hereto; and providing an effective date. Seconded
by Gold. ALL AYE... MOTION CARRIES.
12. PUBLIC COMMENT 2: The Eagle City Council is taking remote public comment via
Webex. Meeting login instructions are posted on
httos://www.citvofeagle.org/1698/Virtual-Meetings. If you just want to watch the
meeting, without giving comment, please watch our livestream at
https://www.citvofeagle.org/305/City-Agendas-Videos.
This time is reserved for the public to address their elected officials regarding concerns or comments
they would like to provide to the City Council regarding any matter, up to and including any subject on
the agenda with the exception of Public Hearin$ and land use items. Comments regarding Public
Hearing and land use items need to be made during the open public hearing for said item(s) in accordance
with Idaho Code. At times, the City Council may seek comments/opinions regarding specific City
matters (excluding Public Hearing and land use items) during this allotted time. Out of courtesy for all
who wish to speak, the City Council requests each speaker limit their comments to three (3) minutes.
Tom Bringle, 2475 Sun Valley Place. Comments on item G — City Hall Expansion and the timeline
of when the public could have provided public comment. If a developer was trying to do a project
like this, there would have been several opportunities for public input.
Page 8
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-25-20min.docx
13. ADJOURNMENT:
Gold moves to adjourn. Seconded by Baun. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES
Hearing no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:34 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
HOLQ' CSENCSITS
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK II
APPROVED:
"ASS:11),1 PIERCE
MAYOR
AN AUDIO RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD AT
W W W.CITYOFEAGLE.ORG.
Page 9
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-25.20min.docx
High Quality Water
• Intake upstream of sewage plants
• Above most farm and urban runoff
• 120 years of many uses
• Groundwater recharge
The 2014 contract
BACKGROUND
The NPDES permits issued in 2012 for Lander Street and West Boise have effluent temperature
limitation requirements that need to be met by 2022. Staff has been researching alternatives to
meet these requirements. One alternative investigated was to approach the Farmers Union Ditch
Company with the possibility of running their canal water through a heat exchanger to cool off
our effluent. There would be no contact between our effluent and their canal water. Surprisingly,
the Farmers Union Ditch Company offered to allow us to completely discharge our water to the
canal, as the Canal Company needs more water and an additional revenue source. We have been
negotiating an agreement following Farmers Union Ditch Company's offer to allow for the
Lander Street effluent discharge. This agreement will be presented in what we propose to be final
form at the Farmers Union Ditch Company board meeting on June 10, 2014. There may be minor
revisions to the agreement but we believe we are very close to having a final agreement.
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
hme 6, 2014
Public Works Commission
John Tenser
Farmers Union Canal Company / Lander Street Effluent Discharge Agreement
ISSUE
Public Works Cotnmuaon (PWC) review of a proposed agreement with the Palmeri (:coon
Ditch Company prorrdmg for Landry Street to discharge effluent to the Farmers Cmen Canal
from April I to October 30 of each year.
BACKGROUND
The NPDES permits issued in 2012 for Lander Street and West Boise have effluent temperature
limitation regrmements that need to be met by 2022. Staff has been researching alternatives to
meet these requirements. One alterative investigated was to approach the Farmers Union Ditch
Company with the possibility of rung their canal water through a heat exchanger to cool off
our effluent. There would be no contact between our effluent and their canal water. Surprisingly.
the Fanners Union Ditch Company offered to allow us to completely discharge our water to the
canal, as the Canal Company needs more water and an additional revenue source. We have been
negotiating an agreement followmg Fanners Um® Ditch Company's offer to allow for the
Lander Street effluent discharge This agreement will be presented in what we propose to be final
form at the Formers Union Ditch Company board meeting on June 10, 2014. There may be minor
revisions to the agreement but we believe we we very close to basing a final agueemmt
The major elements of this agreement are: 1) we can discharge during the periods of time we
have the most problem meeting the temperance requirements (April 1— October 30 each year):
2) it is a 25 year agreement, however. we are not obhgated to provided flow to the canal - it is
our choice: 3) we pas Farmers Union either S50,000 per year or the annual assessment rate they
charge their then based upon water used or in our use, water transposed, whichever is greater,
and 4) we can terminate the agreement for any reason. however Farmers Union an only
terminate the agreement after 25 years or if the discharge of our water tuggers them to comply
with NPDES requirements or we are in material breach of the contract
Table 2. Examples of ('EC Categories and .Associated Effects
Use Category
Antibiotics
Disinfectants
Fire retardants
Industrial additives
Life-style products (Caffeine, Nicotine)
Nonprescription drugs
Other prescription drugs
Personal care products
Pesticides
Plasticizers
Reproductive hormones
Solvents
Steroids
Where has it been detected?t'►
Suspected health effects from
environmental exposure')
Groundwater, surface water, wastewater treatment plant
effluent, land applied biosolids, potable water, recycled
water
Antibiotic resistance in disease causing
bacteria complicating treatment of
infections
F
Wastewater treatment plant effluent, treated potable
water. ground and surface waters, recycled water
Genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, carcinogenicity
Rivers down gradient of landfills and PBDE manufacturing
sites, sewage sludge, natural waterways, sediments,
bioaccumulation in fish, whales and other aquatic
organisms
Endocrine disruption, indications of
increased risk for cancer
Industrial and household waste, soil
Can be toxic to animals. ecosystems. and
humans
Potable water, groundwater and surface waters affected
by sewage or wastewater treatment plant effluent
Can cause cellular stress, negative effects
on reproductive activity In animals
Wastewater treatment plant effluent, surface water,
potable water, recycled water
Unknown health effects
Potable water, recycled water, groundwater, surface water,
wastewater treatment plant effluent, land applied biosolids
Increased cancer rates, organ damage
Ground -waters, surface waters. sewage, wastewater
treatment plant effluent, biosolids. aquatic sediments,
biological samples (bioaccumulated in fish tissues)
Bacterial resistance, endocrine disruption
e
Groundwater, surface water, potable water, recycled water
Endocrine disruption
mcreasednskof cancer
�1
on
Surface water
Surface waters, potable water, recycled water, wastewater
4
Groundwater, soil, potable water
Number of publications per year
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0
O
0
N
Publications per year
Journals
A Countries
0
0
0
N
CD CO O O Ca d' (O CO
N N N N N N N
11 Year of publication
pb
Endocrine disrupti
/J;
r/117
' •�
Endocrine disruption
Endocrine disruption
Endocrine disruption, liver and kidney
damage. respiratory impairment, cancer
Surface waters, groundwater, potable water, recycled
water, wastewater, sewage, effluent, biosolids
1. This column indicates locations at which the category of CEC has been detected and/or studied and not
necessarily the limit of their distribution.
2. For many of these chemicals, listed effects result from very high levels of exposure.
ARROYO 2013
eatm nt
microponutants
1
annk.tant tipir.r into
nenoklit
e.ttairm
antibiotic resistancegenes
200
150
100
50
0
Number of journals or countries
CHAMPIONSHIPS VIDEO PLAYING ADVANCING CELEBRATING GIVING TICKETS SHOP
- - WATER RESOURCE CEI ITER
Is Recycled Water Harmful To Turf
And Landscape Plants?
• As a result, when using recycled water, a general rule of thumb is to use 10
to 20 percent more water so that salt accumulation in plant tissues and soil
will be less concentrated and salts can leach through the soil. When salt
accumulations do reach critical levels in the soil, a heavy watering may be
the best approach to flush, or leach, salts downward through the soil
profile.
• Furthermore, sensitive plants, such as those on golf putting greens, may
need to be irrigated occasionally with potable water to meet water needs
of the plant without adding salts to the soil.
• https://www.usga.org/course-care/water-resource-center/our-experts-
explain--water/is-recycled-water-harmful-to-turf-and-landscape-plants-
.html
0 0
ed
Mtn
Co lew
M
.a.. M. .Um.
mommg
eriment„�
w.�
,.on.�w.�t,n..t....
FOREVER CHEMICALS
JIeFOSAA NEtFOSAA 11CI-P
PrS PFHpA PFPeS PFTreA
PFHpA PFDS PFUnA PFTriA GenX FOSA FtS 6:
PFOA HFPO-DA PFPeA ADONA PFPeS PFMOPrA
HpA PFBA PFOAFA10:2 FTSA PFOS
HxS PFBS FOSA PFBA PFNA PFD
PFTrDAv PF" _ *
OSA PFHx;
PFHxDA PF
•cause developmental effects in infants
'lower a woman's chance of getting pregnant
•increase a woman's blood pressure during pregnancy
'lower infant birth weights
•interfere with the body's natural hormones
•increase cholesterol levels
•affect the immune system
•increase the risk of cancer
Hydro;l'.obcchain or 'tar
1 part per trillion (ppt)
IS EQUIVALENT TO A
SINGLE DROP OF
WATER IN
20 oiympic-sized
swimming pools
WA ma
Hydrophilic -head" group
h.
PFAS: LAWS, LITIGATION IN A
TRANSACTIONAL CONTEXT
The air was thick and murky with the smoke of it, and this, combined with the
violent movement of the ship as she struggled through the storm would surely have
made me sea -sick had 1 been a victim to that malady. (The Sea Wolf, Jack London)
V environmental
I-IOLLAND&HART A
UNBOUNDED -LITIGATION LANDSCAPE
Since PFAS litigation picked up steam in the early 2000s it has mainly focused on the manufacturers-3M,
Chemours, DuPont, etc. However, lawsuits have been filed with PFAS users as well. PFAS litigation is ballooning;
hundreds of cases have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation in Ohio and South Carolina, class action
lawsuits over contamination have been certified, and states are filing actions against manufacturers and users
alike.
er
1��
THE ORANGE COUNTY
REGISTER
SIGN U
'Scrr
Press I1-11
to exit full screen
News North OC South OC Sports Things To Do Obits Opinion
Subscribe
Log In
OC off COV!D list Ballot propositions 101 Leaping dolphins off Newport Latest on wildfires Drive-thru Halloween event
NEWS ENVIRONMENT • ..
Orange County water districts consider massive lawsuit over PFAS
contamination
The "forever chemical' is forcing the closure of dozens of wells and increased use of more expensive imported water.
Nine Orange County water agencies have retained a legal team to study whether
to file suit to recoup the $1 billion or more it could cost to purify drinking water
in local wells contaminated with PFAS chemicals and to pay for more expensive
imported water in the interim.
The PFAS compounds — long used in Scotchguard, Teflon
have leached into groundwater supplies over several deca
linked to a variety of health problems, including cancer, IN
damages -,,,.i „i. . .,,. e--Re - thnt )nn
manufact
O.C. hit hard
4
Normal treatment of wastewater and drinking water does not remove the PFAS
toxins, which have been dubbed "forever chemicals" because of their resistance
to breaking down in nature.
Contamination from PFAS has been found throughout the state and country,
including all Southern California counties. But Orange County has been harder
hit than its neighbors, in large measure because of treated wastewater from the
Inland Empire being released into the Santa Ana River and then absorbed into
the county's primary groundwater basin.
What happens if PFAS is discharged into the canal?
• How much PFAS is likely in effluent?
• How much is it diluted?
• How much water is used to irrigate?
• Where will the water end up?
• Where does PFAS end up in soil?
• How much of it stays in the soil instead of moving
down into groundwater or up into crops?
• What are the likely regulatory standards?
Wastewater impacted
water
Irrigation
Wastewater
.4.
Soil ammedment
1:1.SEV11a2
Ilellvon S 120191 .Al2 inn
Contents lists available at ScicnccDirect
Heliyon
journal homepage: wLwN.heliyon.com
era_
An investigation into per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in nineteen
Australian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs)
Timothy L. Coggan".. , Damien Moodie", Adam Kolobaric a, Drew Szabo', Jeff Shimeta
Nicholas D. Crosbieli, Elliot Leeel, Milena Fernandese'f, Bradley O. Clarke"
• C., o , ., y and Rrmedeariort School of Saone. RANT Uriwnvy. GPO Box 2476, Mel6ua.r, Lie. 3001. Ao0rda
App"ef Research. Melbourne Wafer Co.prmtm.. DoeFkn6, VIC, 3001, Australia
Faulty of Engin ens% Unhenby of Nor South Wain NSW, 2052 Australia
Wain Corporation Leedernik. Wemm Australia 6007. Monello
SA Water. GPO Box 1751. Addalde SA. 5001. Mamba
1 College 4I Science and Engineering Flinders Unherner. Adelaide. Australia
ARTICLE INFO
Rrywsrdx
Environmental seienre
Chemistry
Chromatography
Environmental analysis
Envuonmenol ofiosiment
Emirs/moms! rhemisW
Environmental hazard
Wage
Environmental pollution
Water pollution F•53B
ABSTRACT
Quantifying the emissions of per- and polyfuoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from Australian waster
plants (WWTP) Is of high importance due to potential Imparts on receiving aquatic ecosys,
Australian PEAS National Environmental Management Plan recommends 0.23 ng L-t of PFOS a
value for 99% species protection for aquatic systems. in this study, 21 PFAS from four classes wr
WWTP solid and aqueous samples from 19 Australian WWTPs. The mean !.IPFAS was 110 ng 1
ng 1. i; range: 9.3-520 ng L 1) In aqueous samples and 34 ng g I dw (median: 12 ng g I dw; rag
g 1 dw) in WWrP solids. Similar to WWIPs worldwide, perfluorocarbotylic adds were gene
effluent. compared to influent. Partitioning to solids within W WI'Ps increased with Increasing 0�
length from 0.05 to 1.22 log units. Many PFAS were highly correlated, and PCA analysis shows
ailons between two groups: odd chained PFCAs, PF14xA and PFSAs: and 6:2 FTS with daily inflow
Concentration (ng L 1)
1
Australian WWTPs represent a unique case as there is no reported
PFAS manufacture and low rates of PFAS are imported for direct use in
industries such as car manufacture, chrome plating, leather treatment,
medical imaging, firefighting and in goods already impregnated (carpets,
furniture, etc.) or in products containing PFAS as impurities [13, 44].
Furthermore, unlike many parts of the world, in Australian cities, sewer
ifiltration
nposition
500
400
300
200
100
Influent (IN)
l=1l=�
Final Effluent (FE)
9 10 11 12 13 14 i„ le 17 1E 19
WWTP
PFAS
PFBA
PFPeA
PFHpA
PFHpA
PFOA
PFNA
PFDA
PFDoA
i ■ PFTeA
PFBS
u 'FPeS
I FH1tS
'FHpS
'FOS
'FOS
62 FTS
8:2 FTS
evg
PFAS Contamination in the U.S. (July 20, 2020)
PFAS Contamination Site
KEY FINDINGS DETAILS
OFFASsoni9ounds are a class of non-sl,ck. G icnw A.'Fut
waterpran slain-reuslant canperatdt Base
used In consumer products and industry.
Beltkamon are PFOS lvnwrty used Tr: Loral Ion
make DuPont's Tenon. and PFOA
formerly in s Seo,clgard. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION
Oj VM low exposure to some PFAS Suspected Source: nre0Fhun2fcam.
ctwm,cals sus been linked to anccr
t lnr,Id diseate•weakenedchildhorxl Test Results.
Unto amity andm.my other health PFA Location Maximum Level
n obietns detected IPP0
Years tested
pj Tetts or tapwofer mlllmry bauw and
Ifldustrlal She, love frwnd PFAS PFBS .,ra melwata 1.240
orltamiiution In more thanil2 Dlehee- 2018
locations In 49 stales. Dnnkil>tlwater IOr
Up 10110 MIN. Americans mwtw PFOe. Grswnowater 100
contaminated with PFAS Omtuu• 2018
PFOS Gioundwatel 141
On -base 2014
PFOS•PFOA Groundwater
Orehase 2010
Sown FWG horn du Feare A6mnnlr
0
—e
Caeca
Nobs
Calbael
How
nNn
Iloroenelbra
Boise
YoNSIvv[M
1.V
raw
Macular Woe
11,6dompolVve
0
CMOs
samoshMrmy
a.aneea•aa�
rt.Olaen
xelre.raar
Way
Feerre
Gosling Verione
PFAS Contamination in the U.S. (July 20, 2020)
PFAS Contamination Site
KEY FINDINGS DETAILS
OPFAS compounds are a class of non- Contamination site: Boise Air Terminal
stick. waterproof. stain -resistant
compounds used in consumer products Location: Boise City. Idaho
and industry. Best known are PFOS.
formerly used to make DuPont's Teflon. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION
and PFOA. formerly In 3M's Scotchgard.
OVery low exposure to some PFAS
chemicals has been linked to cancer.
thyroid disease. weakened childhood
Immunity and many other health
problems.
Suspected Source: Firehghting loam
Test Results:
PFA Location Maximum Level
detected (ppt)
Years tested
OTests of tap water. military bases and PF85 Groundwater 150
industrial sites have found PFAS On -base 2019
contamination in more than 712
locations in 49 states. Drinking water PFHpA Groundwater 84
for up to 110 million Americans maybe On -base 2019
contaminated with PFAS. PFFIxS Groundwater 210
On -base 2019
PFNA Groundwater 18
On -base 2019
PFOA Groundwater 8.2
On -base 2019
PFOS Groundwater 290
On -base 2019
PFOS.PFOA Groundwater 295
On -base 2019
Source: EWG from Air Force Administrative
Record
0
view repOrt
Eagle Island
Meridian
Kuna
Eagle
GardenClty Boise
BI
0
Ludy Pe.
Reserve
Ludy o:,t state
•
Auloier<
(■ 0n)
�i v•
PFAS ione FUC. • p Search
R.ltard Llewellyn • d X
File Home Insert
rbf7. Cut
Paste hcop'.
sal Format Deaner
Clipboard 6
E28
Page Layout
Formulas Data Review view Developer Help
Add .10 - A A _ _ � iPj - ttt, wrap Text
General -
8 r 11 - 6 - d - A - c c = _ _ ® Merge& Cemer - $ - % 9 e8 18
Font 6 AJ:gnment 6 Number 6
f•
Ee Normal Bad
Conditional Format as !Calculation
Formatting - Table -
Check Cad
Styles
Good
.re., [input
Neutral
e Share P Comments
�Autcium - Zrj /_ f
roFill- lF
Inuit Delete Format Son & Find & Ideas
- - QClear- Filter- Solon
Celli Editing Ideas
A 8 C 13 E F 0 .t H 1 J K L M N , 0
1 PFAS level in effluent (ngt) kg PFAS regulated Liters par cubic foot canal Bow (cfs) discharge (ds) dilution factor Idaho minets inch (cfs) irrigation season rogation secondstotal PEAS (ng) F PFAS (g) with va retention rate cubic toot sod (SF concentration in cubic yet concentration evenly dlstnbuted
2 1 28 3168 100 25 5 0.02 6 15552000 261229724 2 0.264229724 0.6 18-18181618 0.000269123
3 125 6
4 150 7
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
11
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
281
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
PFAS by dilution PFAS by input Sheetl
175 8
200 9
225 10
220191436 8 0.220191437
168735617 3 0 189735517
165143577 6 0.165143578
146794291 2 0 146794291
132114862 1 0.132114862
)upyter PFAS in Ferman Union Canal . o...n.r •t,.••.r..pe c.n.e•.e e.,.y.:
In* fun ..•
a + a e e
131
In l 1
• a Wier, ■ c 11 • =
frw utpletltb tyart-1 �••
/me .pl l.olkll...plal3d Impart et•sl(r
• panne Constants
titersc•e1ot • Sa.3fa • ilrIl
• 0lschar,. • 02If
• Liter. Loh • a e2 offs
e . towns
cy_nll rt • 2M1/1 : •toe, ,toss r av ton
waelee far pros trout
Din • • nd.,l
fa apin aped • If
peastrput • no arenpell..at pe•s•11 • nsl
raw peas toad • ro•np .arell... 4 edd•11
• aril_riw • aeoredroa oaten l rM.1i3.130. uf. t•el ), rwaree•erwl
plas wnt_sw.on • np.onatllsll_ofes.u. ptas ado. ten/1anel 110r11, • t1111 0.a•. 'vas arpesttea fro. 1 gnrn 1
• r:Mles for pins cOnfentrarion
tentlon rate • np.enrgel/ I.0.9.ttel.0. 11 • Frame. et pros remaining In soil Idd.s nor u 1 Sot sloe•
• fp thresh • op arrayl(l, 1 3. de-.,11/ll00• repot,rory earesaeim sham nail, een.erree ro a/4
r� nn • np.peapaceIre thrhltl.rp thrnh(-11.301
retention • ro.tlnlp4cei..t.At1tonlNf(a I, retenilpa_rottl.11. s•1
. rems_ec e • 4e44
• ors r dersr 1 aire
pen cant • no.nllus pfa,•u pfas ad0•lenlcaral itwt.bt_010.I.10.n111
yeari tp threshold • no.seras(Itou Vfn.wax_pras_add.Fealcanal_rtwl.len(sefedt10n).1•errp,ll
fee 1 to raegel•ixy fast:
for h1..W (lenlnee peas 00d11:
ancellenicwl flwll:
n etas sass saanit.).kl • plu„Snputltl • nbr pen addill • dloclurgeeleanel tlwtkl•dtacharpel • se
fart le 6neellenlretentl0ntl:
pea. cm,cll.f.k,U • pun .••_seawntt,).k) • retenitanll) a cy-sa11 rt r parch acre
fee • 1. renpeltenlregll-
n..r1 1e thr.Mldll.l.k.t.31 • roat•troe s ,Oncli.).k.l)
p • years se thresnld(te.1.3,20:.:)
• retmtioh129:1
y•rp1:1
x.Y • ,p.oeshpr100.0
flip • pit.11puretl
▪ • •mslp14p,
a. • ,11111d_s14Di0t1111. Dro)e<[lpe.-ld 1
t loops
•a• ror rlluereuloops
0 000224269
0.000192231
0 000168202
0 000149513
0 000131561
5.56039E-08
4.63366E-08
3.97171E-08
3.47524E-08
3 08911E-08
2.78019E-08
.01
How many years until property is hazardous?
Years to PFAS Hazard: 1 miners inch per acre
-2000000
-1500000
-1000000
500000
1.0
0.8 A`E� -'
0.6 \ate
0
0.4 cefr' �r
0.2 06
50 0.0 A.9
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000
600000
400000
200000
How many years until property is hazardous?
Years to PFAS Hazard: 1 miners inch per acre with 576 sq ft sink
0
10
tfiu20
ent conc_rtrat 30 40
" PFAS P9/L 50
- 25000
20000
15000
- 10000
- 5000
1.0
0.8 A4-Di
0.6 o\6
0.4 `eyr
0.2 oc��
0.0 e�
- 20000
- 15000
- 10000
- 5000
6000 -
5000 -
4000 -
0
i
r 3000 -
2000 -
1000 -
Years to PFAS Hazard at 5 ng/L PFAS Effluent
250 -
200 -
i 150 -
to
100 -
50 -
0
Years to PFAS Hazard at 5 ng/L PFAS Effluent
0.045 0.0095 0.002
Regulatory threshold mg/kg
0- 1
1.0 0.21 0.045 0.0095 0.002
Regulatory threshold mg/kg
I
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
0
rFs
} 1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 - —
Years to PFAS Hazard at 10 ng/L PFAS Effluent
1.0
140 -
120 -
100 -
La
80-
60-
40 -
20-
0.21 0.045 0.0095
Regulatory threshold mg/kg
0
Years to PFAS Hazard at 10 ng/L PFAS Effluent
r
0.045 0.0095 0.002
Regulatory threshold mg/kg
0.002
1
1200 -
1000 -
800 -
N
L
tv 600 -
400 -
200 -
0
Years to PFAS Hazard at 25 ng/L PFAS Effluent
1.0
50 -
40 -
L 30 -
N
a,
20 -
10 -
0.21 0.045 0.0095
Regulatory threshold mg/kg
0
Years to PFAS Hazard at 25 ng/L PFAS Effluent
1 r �
0.045 0.0095 0.002
Regulatory threshold mg/kg
0.002
600 -
500 -
400 -
0
(0
300 -
200 -
100 -
0
Years to PFAS Hazard at 50 ng/L PFAS Effluent
1.0
25 -
20-
P 15-
ro
r
10-
5-
0
Years to PFAS Hazard at 50 ng/L PFAS Effluent
0.045 0.0095 0.002
Regulatory threshold mg/kg
0.21 0.045 0.0095 0.002
Regulatory threshold mg/kg
How many years until property is hazardous?
Years to PFAS Hazard: 1 miners inch per acre with 576 so ft sink
0
10
20
Effiuent cod?ce30
ntrati 40
on PFAS � 50
n9/
25000
20000
15000
- 10000
5000
1.0
0.8 ce
0.6 ,\6
0.4 eyr
0.2 c`1�`
0.0 AJ�a�
e
- 20000
- 15000
- 10000
- 5000
Most variation comes from differences in
potential regulatory regimes, and from
differences in individual properties.
•
1
411110
UBIQUITOUS AND UNCTUOUS
■ What do you do if you find it?
— Seller Indemnities
■ Will be hard because of the uncertainty
• Is not recognized by CERCLA
— Traditional Contract protections
— Insurance
— Most that look and find it are treating it as a hazardous waste
■ Not all hazardouswaste facilitieswill take it
HOLLAND&HART A
What happens if a hazardous level of PFAS builds up?
PFAS never mentioned in Nampa's DEQ permit for a similar reuse plan!
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Reuse Permit
M-255-01
City of Nampa (hereafer"permiuec') is hereby authorized to construct. install. and operate a
reuse facility in aourrdance withill) this permit: (2) IDAPA 311.01.17 "RccycIcd Water Rules":
(3) an approved plan of operation; and (4) all other applicable federal, state. and local laws.
statutes, and rules. This permit is effective from the date of signature and expires un (120 months
from issoc date).
Draft
Signature
Aaron Scheff
Regional Administrator
Boise Regional Office
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Date
Idaho Department of Erwironmental Quality
Boise Regional Office
1445 N. Orchard
Boise. ID 83706
208-373-0550
MEMORANDUM
TO: Larry Waters, P.E., Bureau Chief. Wastewater Program
Aaron Schef. . Administrator, Boise Region
Mary Anne Nelson. Administrator, Water Quality Division
Adam Bussan. P.E., Senior Water Quality Engineer. Wastewater Program
FROM: Valerie A. Grecar, P.E., Senior Water Quality Engineer. Boise Region
DATE: October 10, 2019
SUBJECT: 81-255-01 City of Nampa. Staff Analysis supporting reuse permit issuance.
Executive Summary
Thc City of Nampa (City) owns and operates a municipal wastewater treatment facility that treats
and discharges water to Indian Creek under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit (1D0022063). The City currently treats 11.6 million gallons per day (mgd) of
water. and has a design flow for the year 2040 of an annual average of 18.6 mgd. The City is
facing interim and fmal limits for total phosphorus, ammonia. and temperature in its current and
upcoming NPDES permits, so the City is upgrading the treater ont facility to mom these
upcoming treatment requirements.
Throughout the planning. design, and construction processes for upgrading the trcatmcnt
facilities. the City enpged the Nampa community through public outroch and stakeholders
meetings, including meetings with thc City Connell and the formation of n Nampa Wastewater
Advisory Group (NWAG), made up of the citizen of Nampa. and an Industrial Working Group.
consisting of Nampa's industrial wastewater customers. All stakeholders had substantial input
into the planning and decision making process for thc upgrades to the wastewater treatment
facilities. and these groups supponcd pursuing a recycled water program. The City passed a
sewer bond in May of 2018. and the focal point of the bond stressed pursuing opportunities for
industrial and irrigation reuse to make the most of the City's available water resources. The
City's application for this reuse permit to use recycled water for irrigation and industrial use is
the first step in implementing this water reuse concept.
Thc City proposes to treat water to Class A recycled water standards during the growing season,
from May through September. and. via the Phyllis Canal, use that water for irrigation by the
uxts of that canal network. The City proposes to begin this use in or around 2026 when thc final
total phosphorus limit becomes effective. Receipt of this permit is needed for planning purposes
as the City designs and builds upgrades to their treatment facilities. With the capacity to treat
water to Class A standards. the City also requested allowance to serve industrial users.
Thc draft permit includes requirements for Class A level filtration and UV disinfection and
requires the water to meet Class A disinfection requirements for turbidity and total coliform. Thc
droll permit includes nutrient limits for 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BODs1 and total
nitrogen of 10 mg'L and 30 rapt respectively. reflecting the Class A requirements for irrigation
cEI.i:RRAri`r 30 vThiiti
J WATEREUSE
The WateReuse Association wants to be exempt from PFAS liability.
The WateReuse Association opposes:
• Designating PFAS as hazardous material under CERCLA. If PFAS is designated as hazardous
under CERCLA, then wastewater and water utilities must be exempted from liability because
water and wastewater utilities do not produce or create PFAS — rather, they receive PFAS in the
water and wastewater they treat; and
• Adoption of any new PFAS regulatory standards or thresholds that are not based on rigorous
science and an understanding of public health and environmental risks.
But would property owners be exempt from PFAS liability?
Next Steps
• Comment at Boise City Council Hearing Sept 15
• Consult with a good environmental attorney specializing in
hazardous waste
• Consult with a good hydrogeologist to understand impacts on the
Eagle aquifer
LI iLISi lin
Syringa Owners
Association
Support of Legacy No.15 - Snoqualmie Falls
Plat Plan with the specific changes unanimously
recommended and approvedby the Planning
and Zoning Commission
Change
Removing Three Lots from Plan and Retaining
as Dry Creek Natural Wildlife Area with
Greenbelt
Focus of P&Z mandated changes to Legacy's previous plan:
Eliminate 3 greenbelt Tots and retain as natural wildlife area
Legacy's Proposal eliminated Dry Creek natural greenbelt and
damaged Dry Creek trees, shrubs and wildlife
• 2 roads and 2 crossings
• Aggressive clearing of creek natural underbrush to extend usable lot area
Cana
eek CCr wildl,�fere !l
ry rubs,
and shrubs, I.t
trees greenbelt SSocd g
Legacy Lots
2
Syringa Concept :Retain natural canal greenbelt & nature refuge from Floating Feather to Beacon Light
4Greenbelt
Tollbrothers &
Syringa
Greenbelts
Continues to
Beacon Light
Syringa homeowners wrought iron fenced view Tots overlook the current natural greenbelt
West
Floating Feather to Beacon Light Dry Creek Canal wildlife refuge and
greenbelt is the only contiguous greenbelt remaining in Eagle
S rin a Homeowners Back Yards
Greenbelt
Extending
toward
Beacon Light
3
.il
iat is at Risk An Eagle Natural Treasure
;
Legacy's Proposed Elimination of the Dry
Creek/Ditch and greenbelt natural habitat violates
Eagle Comprehensive Plan guidelines
(2017 and 2004 versions)
2017
Chapter 1— VISION — "Densities and development will be scaled and strategically
located to meet the needs of the community AND TO PROTECT THE PLACES WE WISH
TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE
NATURAL FEATURES, HAZARD AREAS AND SPECIAL SITES GOALS 7.2... "To provide
special concern and attention to the preservation of native wildlife, plant, natural areas
when implementing planning and zoning decisions"
• 7.3 ... To integrate development into the landscape in order to
habitat"
avoid destruction of
• 7.4 .... "Link protected habitat areas with each other
• Page 162:
• D..."Encourage the preservation of habitat areas which provide for fish and wildlife"
• E.... "Consider wildlife habitat and needs when developing housing ..."
Protect and improve natural and man-made water ways.
2004 Plan
Chapter 1— OVERVIEW
1.3 The City of Eagle Vision Statement
b. A unique community that maintains its rural residential feel in the midst of the
Treasure Valley.
CHAPTER 6 — LAND USE
6.7 Implementation Strategies
a. Preserve the natural features and resources of Eagle.
b. Protect gravity flow irrigation systems including canals, laterals and ditches ....
CHAPTER 7 — NATUREAL RESOURCES AND HAZARD AREAS
7.9 Goal — Special concern and attention should be given to the preservation of fish,
wildlife,
water resources, When implementing planning and zoning decisions.
CHAPTER 9 — PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACES
9.1 Background
... Eagle's natural features, the foothills, floodplains of the Boise River, Dry Creek and
other natural areas are treasured by the community and require protection....
9.5 PATHWAYS AND GREENBELTS
... Greenbelts are typically land areas that border scenic features or hazard areas (i.e.
the River and Dry Creek) and are designed to prevent undesirable encroachment.
9.3 Implementation Strategies
f. Prioritize greenbelt and pathway development .... 2)
along the Dry Creek;....
9.6 OPEN SPACE
9.6.1 GOAL — To provide wherever possible open space and natural features such as
natural river frontage, greenbelts, river trails and pathways canals, development
buffers, wooded areas, grasslands........
9.6.2 Objectives
a. To establish open space to protect the finite resource base of Eagle's natural
environment - ... forested areas, plan and wildlife habitats,
d. To protect the natural lay of the land (e.g., minimize land disturbance).
e. To protect such unique environmental areas as.... Natural areas, and wildlife
habitat.
f. To protect important views, vistas, and panoramas of the community's natural
setting and environments.
greenbelt/pathway system
CHAPTER 11— SPECIAL AREAS AND SITES
11.1 Background and Vision
... The River Floodplain, .... the Dry Creek Floodplain, ... possess a recognized
function as a wildlife habitat, floodway and scenic natural resource reflective
of Eagle's rural character.
... These special areas will require comprehensive and specific planning ....
•
• Fish and wildlife habitat
• Existing trees and natural features
• River and creek greenbelt areas
• Potential for permanent open space and
natural preserves...
Impact on Syringa Homeowners
Impact on Syringa Homeowners is Significant — and Unnecessary
There are alternative approaches that can retain the greenbelt and wildlife
refuge and allow Legacy to maintain their current number of Lots
gle story dramatic
impacts Syringa.
.1111111111111111
"vow; 1111101111
Legacy's requested reduced lot sizes (back and side yard setbacks)
r
Impact on Syringa Homeowners is Significant — and Unnecessar
Actual Legacy Builder Home
(11111111141 NIT
Impact on Syringa Homeowners by Legacy's
building 3 homes in our back yards are
Violations of City Of Eagle Comprehensive Plan
guidelines
2017
1.3... PLAN ORGANIZATION
"The purpose of the Eagle Comprehensive Plan is to develop a set of guidelines used
to promote the general welfare of the residence:
"To protect property rights and enhance property values"
CHAPTER 2: PROPERTY RIGHTS
2.1... BACKGROUND
The right to hold and enjoy property
"Property rights must balance the individuals desire to ("do whatever I want with my
land" with respect for the property rights of neighboring owners).
"Land use policies, restrictions, conditions and fees of the City of Eagle
violate property rights, (ADVERSELY, IMPACT PROPERTY VALUES)"
should not
There Are Many Alternative Building Lot Locations
Using Currently Proposed Common Areas
Sample of how the developer can retain the current target
number of lots while removing the 3 greenbelt lots:
• Without eliminating the Dry Creek greenbelt
• While avoiding significant impact on the current Dry Creek
Canal ecological wildlife refuge
• While avoiding the impacts on Syringa homeowners
Reductions of some of
Legacy's most recent plans
lot sizes may be required
to regain the lots (within
code).
I IT
•
I vi
1
1
;17
N ALOADE
. • ..... :
1 .
,
From Snoqualmi: Ills No:15 Pri ary
N MOSCOW AVe '
beveloprrint PHI ;Dec. 31;2019
c 1.
aJ
,
Conclusion
• P&Zs proposed removal of 3 lots and retention of the
Dry Creek Canal and greenbelt wildlife reserve serves
as a win -win -win for all concerned
• Retains option for Legacy retaining its target number of lots
for the development
• Addresses the overall guidelines of the City of Eagle's
Comprehensive Plan(s) related to nature area preservation
• Addresses the Syringa homeowners concerns regarding their
backyard views, connection with nature and reduced home
values
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
August 25, 2020
PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN-UP
Time is allotted on the agenda at the beginning and end of the council meeting.
Time is limited to three (3) minutes per individual
TESTIFY PRO/ CON or
NAME (please print) ADDRESS YES/NO NEUTRAL
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING:
Item 10D: A-06-19/RZ-12-19/CU-08-19/PPUD-05-19/PP-08-19 — Rene Place Planned Unit
Development
August 25, 2020
NAME (please print) ADDRESS
(V\
,)- -c_ "1 b o ( ci•LD
ern � � �,�at-5l-fie
a� (U. 4//r
#/^I�h fr(b1/ 3% IJiJ./&/I'
CcJ4 At Q iJc Cco
Wilevcvme 91?t2 03-1 Ale ?I. UO (on/
1WE 60S (`I.tciLet�
TESTIFY PRO/ CON
YES/NO NEUTRAL
N-10 1-\.c
1 of 3
a
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING:
Item 10C: CU-09-19/PPUD-06-19/PP-09-19 Snoqualmie Falls Subdivision No. 15
August 25, 2020
NAME (please print)
4MN Riork
Kh-#ur1-1
RDQ-
( �-oS j CAL
J.Tivi )J-4 c)
LTNDA l,/,„e,�
1
ADDRESS
23S) N e I.i.icr: VE
I Si W Lt - / 0z
19S7 A/,Gvoi A--Lix-
ftrtb4--iL, FY(P/4
TGel Ir2Lc:c» 11L
1-2YASle 1J r36JL
( 7S7N
9 g I!- kiAt
EAc� p-' g 3 G/ 4
.may/Sal Atx - eQ 72
EAGLE 123 g'/6
o -
TESTIFY
YES/NO
Y6s
y-s
/A- 5
o
N
PRO/ CON
NEUTRAL
N�
Jv10
A/0
1 of3
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING:
Item 10B: VAC-01-20 Vacation to the Final Plat of Coast to Coast Subdivision
August 25, 2020
TESTIFY PRO/ CON
NAME (please print) ADDRESS YES/NO NEUTRAL
1 of 3
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING:
Item 10F: CPA-02-20 — Comprehensive Plan Amendment — City of Eagle
August 25, 2020
TESTIFY PRO/ CON
NAME (please print) ADDRESS YES/NO NEUTRAL
1 of 3
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING:
Item 10A: CU-03-20 Senior Assisted Living Facility and a Waiver
August 25, 2020
TESTIFY PRO/ CON
NAME (please print) ADDRESS YES/NO NEUTRAL
1of3
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
August 25, 2020
PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN-UP
Time is allotted on the agenda at the beginning and end of the council meeting.
Time is limited to three (3) minutes per individual
NAME (please print)
ADDRESS
uvlYe L,1SS?-t, 6r;
TESTIFY PRO/ CON or
YES/NO NEUTRAL
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING:
Item 10E: RZ-12-08 MOD3 — Modification to Development Agreement — Restored
Community Church
August 25, 2020
TESTIFY PRO/ CON
NAME (please print) ADDRESS YES/NO NEUTRAL
1of3
2020/08/22-25 comments on NextDoor opposed to the Eagle Museum site
1. Sandy Hamilton
2. Margie Ridgeway
3. Kim Wingate
4. Cathy Harral
5. Perry Lea
6. EM Stamm
7. George Griffith
8. Michele Romero
9. Kali Carringer
10. Jennifer Durst
11. Chris Ellesmere Jones
12. Lise McGraw
13. Zoe Neyens
14. Juli Palo George
15. Ana Jackson
16. Bernadette Buentgen
17. Kathleen Stephens
18. Linda Birk
19. Carol Blair
20. Lisa Mayer
21. Marilyn Hansen
22. Christi Cox
23. Connie Cole -Craven
24. Suzanne Higby
25. Linda Kennedy
26. Elaine Craig
27. Jean Young
28. Allison Marusich
29. Martha Daugherty
30. Cindy Shroeder
31. Jim Riley
32. Phil Carney
33. Elizabeth Roberts
34. Linda Conn
35. Ellen Spencer
36. Andrea Jakious
37. Shawn Perla
38. Rob Roberts
39. Anette Matlock
40. Kim Gurgel
41. Marilee Allen
42. Tracey Schuyler
43. Marie Alder
44. Kathy Hobbs
45. Gayle O'Donnell
46. Nick Randazzo
Lexington Hills
Beacon Light
Brookwood
Pine Ranch & Pine Ridge
Brookwood
Ballantyne & Eagle Road
Ranch to Floating Feather
Mace River Ranch
Chaumont
Pine Ranch & Pine Ridge
Lexington Hills
Brookwood
East Riverside Drive
Brookwood
Dry Creek Rural
Eagle View
Eagle Ranch
Ballantyne & Eagle Road
Lexington Hills
Lexington Hills
Hill Road Parkway
Ranch Estates
Ranch to Floating Feather
Brookwood
Lexington Hills
Dry Creek Rural
Echohawk Estates
Brookwood
Lexington Hills
Eagle Springs
Brookwood
Brookwood
Lexington Hills
N Story Book Way/N Ever After St
Eagle Pointe
Guerber Park
Brookwood
Lexington Hills
Guerber Park
Brookwood
Clear Creek Crossing
Ranch to Floating Feather
Ranch Estates
Downtown Eagle
Lexington Hills
Ballantyne/Eagle Road
1
2020/08/22-25 comments on NextDoor opposed to the Eagle Museum site
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
Lisa Albi
Linda Heath
Nancy Soares
Beverly Carver
Chris Scott
Midori Krueger
Doug Green
Marilyn Whitney
Jolene Rausch
Mark Butler
Judy Meadors
Lynn Canning
Brandie Broberg
Jean Livingston
Sydney Amber
Tia Frisk
Cynthia Franklin
Dawn Gasaway
Terry Lundon
Teresa Brownlee
Emily Perkins
Sally Rubens
Mary Lark
Dean Hovde
Shari Glass
Caterina Lasome
Dawn Lea
Christopher Avery
Debbie Hertzog
Megan Bennett
In support of the location:
Bill Paddock
Kevin Cassidy
Beverly Carver
Jeff Russell
Riverside
East Riverside Drive
Two Rivers
Brookwood
Eagle View
Echohawk Estates
Lexington Hills
Eagle Hills
Clear Creek Crossing
Edgewood Estates
Clear Creek Crossing
Streamside
Eagle Village
Two Rivers
Olde Park PI
Beacon Light
Down Town Eagle
Lexington Hills
W Beacon Light
Mace River Ranch
Echo Creek
Two Rivers
Winding Creek
Colony
W Beacon Light
Two Rivers
Brookwood
Eagle Hills
Lexington Hills
Mace River Ranch
Ballantyne/Eagle Road
Lexington Hills
Brookwood
Mace River Ranch
2