Minutes - 2001 - City Council - 08/28/2001 - RegularORIGINAL
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
Minutes
August 28, 2001
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA 6:30 p.m.- 7:30 p.m.
1. COMPASS: Erv Olen will review the draft 1-84 Corridor Study. Clair Bowman distributes
information on the 1-84 Corridor Study and provides Council with an overview of the Study.
General discussion.
2. Ada County Sheriff's Office: Sgt. Patrick Calley will present the July monthly report.
Discussion of Eagle City Code 4-9-1 (noise ordinance). Sgt. Calley distributes the monthly
report and discusses the same. General discussion. Deputy Harris is leaving team Eagle and
Deputy Kelly Adams will be his replacement.
Mayor discusses the letter received from Dave Beggrow with Eagle Hills in regards to a citation
that was issued in violation of the noise ordinance.
Deputy Jon McDaniel discusses the incident.
Dave Beggrow, Eagle Hills: Discusses the incident. I am asking that we continue to mow and
stay away from the complaining residents house until later in the morning. Reads from
Covenants for the subdivision. Would like the ordinance to be changed from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00
a.m.
General Council discussion.
3. Mike Mongelli will review the Dry Creek Flood Study. Mike Mongelli provides an overview
of the Dry Creek Flood Study for the Council. General discussion.
Discussion on building heights.
4. Mayor and Council's Report: Moved to end of Agenda.
5. City Engineer Report: Moved to end of Agenda.
6. City Clerk/Treasurer Report: Moved to end of Agenda.
7. Zoning Administrator's Report: Moved to end of Agenda.
8. City Attorney Report: Moved to end of Agenda
Mayor: I want to the general public to know that the scheduled Public Hearings on Cedro
Glen Estates, Item ~t'7A, B and C will be continued to the October 9, 2001, City Council
meeting. A formal motion will be during the regular City Council meeting.
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA: 7:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Yzaguirre calls the meeting to order at 7:50 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: BASTAIN, MERRILL, SEDLACEK, GUERBER. All present. A
Quorum is present.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
CONSENT AGENDA:
Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless the Mayor, a
Councilmember, member of City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed
from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent Agenda
will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the Rules of
Order.
Any item on the Consent Agenda which contains written Conditions of Approval
from the City of Eagle City Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission, or Design
Review Board shall be adopted as part of the City Council's Consent Agenda
approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Claims Against the City.
B. Minutes of August 14, 2001.
C. Minutes of August 21, 2001.
D. Findings and Conclusions for CU-10-96 MOD - 135-Foot High Personal
Wireless Facility - Cricket Communications: Cricket Communications,
represented by Kirk Johnson with Pacific Telecom Services, LLC, is requesting a
modification to the existing conditional use permit to increase the height of the
existing 120-foot high monopole to 135-feet to accommodate the co-location of
another cellular service provider. The existing pole is located at the Republic
Mini-Storage facility at 8785 Horseshoe Bend Road approximately 1/4 mile
north of State Street. (WEV)
E. DR-43-98 MOD - Directional Sign for Eagle Pavilion Shopping Center -
Marvin Doty: Per City Council request, all design review applications are to be
appealed by the Zoning Administrator to the City Council for their review prior to the
action taken by the Design Review Board on an application being final. Marvin Doty,
represented by Debbie Anderson with Idaho Electric Signs Co., is requesting
design review approval to construct a directional wall sign for the Eagle Pavilion
Shopping Center. The site is located on the northeast corner of S. Eagle Road and
State Highway 44 at 480 S. Eagle Road.
F. DR-34-01 - Common Area Landscaping within Arbor Ridge Subdivision
Phase I - Stacia Patterson: Per City Council request, all design review applications
are to be appealed by the Zoning Administrator to the City Council for their review prior
to the action taken by the Design Review Board on att application being final. Stacia
Patterson, represented by Mark Butler with Land Consultants Inc., is requesting
design review approval of the common area landscaping within Arbor Ridge
Subdivision Phase I. The site is located north of Hill Road and west of State
Highway 55.
G. DR-36-01 - Building Wall Sign for Custom Care Cleaners - Custom Care
Cleaners: Per City Council request, all design review applications are to be appealed
by the Zoning Administrator to the City Council for their review prior to the action taken
by the Design Review Board on an application being final. Custom Care Cleaners,
represented by Debbie Anderson with Idaho Electric Signs Co., is requesting
design review approval to construct an internally illuminated wall sign for the
Custom Care Cleaners. The site is located on the north side of Plaza Drive
within Eagle Plaza Shopping Center at 228 East Plaza Drive.
H. DR-48-01 - Two Building Wall Signs for the Eagle Fire Station - Eagle Fire
Protection District: Per City Council request, all design review applications are to be
appealed by the Zoning Administrator to the City Council for their review prior to the
action taken by the Design Review Board on an application being final. Eagle Fire
Protection District, represented by Larry Knopp, is requesting design review
approval to construct two building wall signs for the Eagle Fire Station facility.
The site is located on the northeast corner of Plaza Drive and Iron Eagle Drive at
966 East Iron Eagle Drive.
I. DR-49-01 - Building Wall Sign and Monument Sign for Washington Federal
Savings Facility - Washington Federal Savings: Per City Council request, all
design review applications are to be appealed by the Zoniag Administrator to the City
Council for their review prior to the action taken by the Design Review Board on an
application being final. Washington Federal Savings, represented by Mack
Bachman with Golden West Advertising, is requesting design review approval to
construct a building wall sign and monument sign for the Washington Federal
Savings facility. The site is located on the south side of State Street
approximately 350-feet west of Palmetto Avenue at 710 East State Street.
J. DR-50-01 - Building Wall Sign and Special Portable Sign for the Blue Moose
Caf6 - Marcy Anderson: Per City Council request, all design review applications
are to be appealed by the Zoning Administrotor to the City Council for their review prior
to the action taken by the Design Review Board on an application being final. Marcy
Anderson, represented by Mark Butler with Land Consultants Inc., is requesting
design review approval of an existing wall sign and special portable sign for the
Blue Moose Caf6. The site is located on the south side of Aikens Road
approximately 350-feet east of Eagle Road at 79 East Aikens Road.
K. DR-53-01 - Building Wall Sign for the Tanning Place - Kathy Nahas: Per
City Council request, all design review applications are to be appealed by the Zoning
Administrator to the City Council for their review prior to the action taken by the Design
Review Board on an application being final. Kathy Nahas, represented by Debbie
Anderson with Idaho Electric Signs Co., is requesting design review approval to
construct an internally illuminated building wall sign for the Tanning Place. The
site is located on the north side of Plaza Drive within the Eagle Plaza Shopping
Center at 228 East Plaza Drive.
L. DR-54-01 - Building Wall Sign for Supercuts - Supercuts: Per City Council
request, all design review applications are to be appealed by the Zoning Administrator to
the City Council for their review prior to the action taken by the Design Review Board on
an application beingfiaal. Supercuts, represented by Debbie Anderson with Idaho
Electric Signs Co., is requesting design review approval to construct an
internally illuminated building wall sign for Supercuts. The site is located on the
north side of Plaza Drive within the Eagle Plaza Shopping Center at 228 East
Plaza Drive.
M. DR-55-01 - Two Building Wall Signs for Vision One within the Eagle
Forum Building - Vision One: Per City Council request, all design review
applications are to be appealed by the Zoning Administrator to the City Council for their
review prior to the action taken by the Design Review Board on an application being
final. Vision One, represented by Debbie Anderson with Idaho Electric Signs
Co., is requesting design review approval to construct two internally illuminated
building wall signs for Vision One. The site is located on the south side of
Cedar Ridge Drive within the Eagle Forum Subdivision at 408 South Eagle
Road.
N. DR-56-01 - Three Special Portable Signs and Three Building Wall Signs for
Chevron Emissions Testing Service - Sandy Smith: Per City Council request, all
design review applications are to be appealed by the Zoning Administrator to the City
Council for their review prior to the action taken by the Design Review Board on an
application being final. Sandy Smith is requesting design review approval of three
special portable signs and three existing building wall signs for the Chevron
Emissions Testing Service located within the car wash building at the Chevron
gas station. The site is located on the west side of Eagle Road within Channel
Center Subdivision at 503 South Eagle Road.
O. Appointment to the Development Impact Fee Committee: The Mayor is
requesting Council confirm the appointment of Larry Coelho to a 2 year term on
the Development Impact Fee Committee. (RY)
P. 9-1-1 Day Proclamation: In honor of the men and women who serve as
Emergency Services Telecommunicators and Dispatchers, the Mayor and
Council are proclaiming September 11, 2001 as "9-1-1 Day". (RY)
Q. Appointment to the Eagle Historic Preservation Commission: The Mayor is
seeking Council confirmation of the appointment of Theresa Steach to a two-
year term on the Commission. (RY)
Merrill: I am requesting that Item #4F be removed from the Consent Agenda.
Guerber moves to approve the amended Consent Agenda. Seconded by Merrill.
ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES .........................
4F. DR-34-01 - Common Area Landscaping within Arbor Ridge Subdivision Phase I -
Stacia Patterson: Per City Council request, all design review applications are to be appealed by the
Zoning Administrator to the City Council for their review prior to the action taken by the Design Review
Board on an application being final. Stacia Patterson, represented by Mark Butler with Land
Consultants Inc., is requesting design review approval of the common ama landscaping within
Arbor Ridge Subdivision Phase I. The site is located north of Hill Road and west of State
Highway 55.
Mayor introduces the issue.
Merrill: We had a letter from the applicant requesting that this item be removed from the
Consent Agenda.
Mark Butler, Land Consultants, Inc., representing the applicant, discusses the Design Review
Board Condition gl0. I would like condition #4 and # 10 removed. General discussion on the
conditions. Distributes pictures of the berm at Tahoe Ridge and Oakley Estates. Displays an
overhead of the landscaping design. General discussion on the fencing of the subdivision.
Merrill moves to approve DR-34-01 Common Area Landscaping within Arbor Ridge
Subdivision Phase I with these changes: Delete Item gl0 and #14 of the Design Review
Board Site Specific Conditions and in place of Item #4 insert #17 of the Conditions of the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the final plat, case no PP-10-00. Seconded by
Bastian. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES ...................
Mayor: We need to add an item to the agenda.
Merrill moves to amend the agenda to add an Executive Session as Item g9 for the
discussion of threatened litigation. Seconded by Sedlacek. ALL AYE: MOTION
CARRIES ...............
5. FINAL PLATS:
A. FP-18-01 - Final Plat for Ringo Ridge Estates Subdivision No. 1 (formerly Arbor Ridge
Subdivision) - Stacia Patterson: Stacia Patterson, represented by Mark Butler with Land
Consultants, Inc., is requesting final plat approval for Ringo Ridge Estates Subdivision No. 1
formerly know as Arbor Ridge Subdivision), 7.78-acre, 26-Iot (22-buildable) residential
subdivision located on the west side of State Highway 55 approximately 1,200-feet north of Hill
Road. This phase is accessed via the easterly extension of Sadie Drive. The site is within the
Eagle City Limits. (WEV)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Mark Butler, Land Consultants, Inc. representing the applicant, we have reviewed the staff report
and we are in agreement. Displays an overhead of the final plat and provides Council an
overview. We have no water rights. Discussion of water rights.
Vaughan: Displays an overhead of the final plat for phase one and provides Council with an
overview of the project. Discussion on the water rights. Staff recommends that this item be
continued until the water issue is resolved.
Veto Brewer, Holladay Engineering, we have looked at the site and we have not seen a design of
how the water is going to handled. We are going to meet next week to look for a solution.
General discussion on the slopes of the pit.
Mark Butler, discussion the slopes. Most of the area is filled. There is a condition that the City
Engineer has to come out and inspect the slopes prior to signing the final plat.
General Council discussion.
Bastian moves to continue this item to the September 11, 2001, City Council meeting.
Seconded by Merrill. Discussion. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES ...................
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. Appointments to the Idaho Community Foundation Citizens Advisory Committee: This
item was continued from the July 17, 2001 meeting.(RY)
Mayor introduces the issue. I have not completed my recommendations for the committee so I
would like to have this matter continued.
Sedlacek moves to continue the appointments to the Idaho Community Foundation Citizens
Advisory Committee to the September 11, 2001, City Council meeting. Seconded by
Guerber. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES ..............................
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. RZ-02-01 - Rezone from A-R to R-1 - RCMPG Investments: RCMPG Investments,
represented by Jean Cariaga with Development Services Inc., is requesting a rezone from A-R
(Agricultural-Residential - one unit per five acres) to R-1 (Residential - one unit per acre) for
Cedro Glen Estates Subdivision (a re-platting of a portion of Bakers Acres Subdivision). The
14.39-acre, 17-1or (14-buildable) residential subdivision is generally located on the southeast
comer of Ballantyne Lane and Hereford Drive. (WEV) This item was continued from the July 24,
2001 meeting.
B. PP-3-01 - Cedro Glen Subdivision- RCMPG Investments: RCMPG Investments,
represented by Jean Cariaga with Development Services Inc., is requesting preliminary plat
approval for Cedro Glen Estates Subdivision (a replat of a portion of Bakers Acres Subdivision).
The 14.39-acre, 17-lot (14-buildable) residential subdivision is generally located on the southeast
corner of Ballantyne Lane and Hereford Drive. (WEV) This item was continued from the July
24, 2001 meeting.
C. VAC-1-01 - Vacation to the final plat of Baker's Acres Subdivision - RCMPG
Investments: RCMPG Investments, represented by Jean Cariaga with Development Services
Inc., is requesting City approval to vacate public street rights-of-way (labeled as "future streets")
together with all utility easements within the right-of-way and the adjoining seven (7)-foot wide
utility easement abutting said rights-of-way from the final plat of Bakers' Acres Subdivision. The
applicant is also requesting the vacation of a portion of the Hereford Drive right-of-way abutting
the parcel, not to include the seven-foot wide utilities easement adjacent to the right-of-way that
will be widened and incorporated into the new plat of Cedro Glen Estates. The non-dimensioned
rights-of-way are located within Lots 1, 3, and 4 of Baker' s Acres Subdivision, generally located
on the southeast corner of the intersection of Ballantyne Road and Hereford Drive. (WEV) This
item was continued from the July 24, 2001 meeting.
Mayor introduces the issue.
Sedlacek: This is property that borders my family property. I will be abstaining due to conflict
of interest.
Bastian moves to continue Items g'/A. RZ-02-1 Rezone from A-R to R-1 RCMPG
Investments, g:7B. PP-3-01 Cedro Glen Subdivision - RCMG Investments, and g7C. VAC-1-
01 Vacation to the final plat of Baker's Acres Subdivision - RCMPG to the October 9, 2001,
City Council meeting and the public hearing signs should be changed to reflect the October
9, 2001, public hearing date. Seconded by Guerber. ALL AYE: MOTION
CARRIES ................
8. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Resolution 01-09: A Resolution Of The Eagle City Council To Vacate The Utility, Drainage
And Irrigation Easements Along The Side Lot Lines Of Lots 56 - 59, 63 - 66, And 75 - 78,
Block 7 Of Lexington Hills Subdivision No. 9 As Shown On The Attachments Hereto; And
Providing An Effective Date. (WEV)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Bastian moves to approve Resolution 01-09. Seconded by Merrill. ALL AYE: MOTION
CARRIES ..............
B. Review and approval of the Payette River Scenic Byway Advisory Committee Bylaws
and Memorandum of Agreement. (LS)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Sedlacek: Distributes a packet of information to the City Council. Discusses the Bylaws and the
Memorandum of Agreement.
General discussion on the Corridor Management Plan.
Merrill moves to approve the by Payette River Scenic Byway Advisory Committee Bylaws,
the Memorandum of Agreement and the Corridor Management Plan as presented tonight.
Seconded by Sedlacek. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES ...........
C. Review and approval of the audit contract for Gibbons, Scott & Dean LLP. (SKM)
Mayor introduces the issue.
City Clerk: The City Attorney has reviewed the contract and it meets her approval. This is an
increase of $175. General discussion.
Sedlacek moves to approve the contract for Gibbons, Scott & Dean LLP in the amount of
$3,675 for the city audit for fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. Seconded by Guerber.
Bastian: AYE; Merrill: AYE; Sedlacek: AYE; Guerber: AYE: ALL AYE: MOTION
CARRIES ....................
D. Review and approval of the service agreement for animal control services between the
City of Eagle and the Idaho Humane Society. (SKM)
Mayor introduces the issue.
City Clerk: The City Attorney has reviewed the contract and it meets her approval. This is an
increase of 4%.
Merrill: I would like to have the Humane Society come before us. I am concerned that the
reports show out of area dogs being picked up. General discussion.
Council would like to have Mr. Donovan come before the City Council.
Guerber moves to approve the contract with the Idaho Humane Society in the amount of
$15,984.80. Seconded by Merrill. Discussion. Bastian: AYE; Merrill: AYE; Sedlacek:
AYE; Guerber: AYE: ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES ....................
E. Review and approval of the Eagle Senior Center Van Use and Senior Center Utilities
Agreement. (SKM)
Mayor introduces the issue.
City Clerk: The City Attorney has reviewed this contract and would like to make some
significant changes and has requested that this be continued to the September 11, 2001, City
Council meeting.
Bastian moves to continue the approval of the Eagle Senior Center Van Use and Senior
Center Utilities Agreement to the September 11, 2001, City Council meeting. Seconded by
Merrill. Discussion. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES ..................
F. Review and approval of the Eagle Security Services and ,Joint Powers Agreement with
the Ada County Sheriff's Office. (SKM)
Mayor introduces the issue.
City Clerk: The City Attorney has reviewed this contract and meets her approval. The $526,162
amount is in accordance with the schedule for FY 1999/2001 with the addition of $2,000 for the
maintenance and repair of the Eagle City Administration Car.
Merrill: I would like to have a further look at this contract. I would like to have a presentation
from the Ada County Sheriff's Office. General discussion.
Merrill moves to continue approval of the Eagle Security Services and Joint Powers
Agreement with the Ada County Sheriff's Office to the September 25, 2001, City Council
meeting. Seconded by Bastian. Discussion. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES .................
Vaughan: The applicant on Consent Agenda Item #4N has requested that this item be
reconsidered after the applicant addresses the Council.
Guerber moves that Consent Agenda Item #4N be brought up for reconsider before the
City Council. Seconded by Sedlacek. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES ...................
4N. DR-56-01 - Three Special Portable Signs and Three Building Wall Signs for Chevron
Emissions Testing Service - Sandy Smith: Per City Council request, all design review applications
are to be appealed by the Zoning Administrator to the City Council for their review prior to the action
taken by the Design Review Board on an application being final. Sandy Smith is requesting design
review approval of three special portable signs and three existing building wall signs for the
Chevron Emissions Testing Service located within the car wash building at the Chevron gas
station. The site is located on the west side of Eagle Road within Channel Center Subdivision at
503 South Eagle Road.
Sandy Smith, Eagle Chevron, 503 S. Eagle Road, I have a couple of questions on No. 6.
Discussion on signs and the placement of them.
Vaughan: The suggestion was that the framed sign be moved to the southwest. The option is up
to her whether or not they do ultimately move the sign. This is only a suggestion. General
discussion.
Sandy Smith: Further discussion on the other signs and the placement of them.
General discussion on the signs.
Bastian moves to continue this item to the September 11, 2001, City Council meeting.
Seconded by Merrill. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES ...............
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Threatened Litigation. I.C. 67-2345(f).
Bastian moves to go into Executive Session for the discussion of threatened litigation.
Seconded by Merrill. Bastian: AYE; Merrill: AYE; Sedlacek: AYE; Guerber: AYE: ALL
AYE: MOTION CARRIES ................
Council discusses threatened litigation.
Council leaves Executive Session.
Mike Moore: Discussion on funding options for a new City Hall. General discussion.
Pre-Council:
4. Mayor and Council's Report:
Guerber: No report.
Merrill: Discussion on a restroom at Heritage Park.
Reports on the fencing at Heritage Park and the tennis court.
Report on the Art Commission.
Discussion on quorums at meetings and the possibility of going to seven member boards.
Discussion on the Monroc property. General discussion.
Mayor: We submitted the application for the Promise Fellow. It has been recommended that
office space for the Promise Fellow be at a conference room in the Library.
Discussion on the pop machine fire at the skateboard park.
Bastian: Reports on Feather Nest Subdivision Homeowner's Association meeting. They intend
to pursue cross connections. General discussion.
Sedlacek: Reports on the Sewer District. Everything is now going to Boise.
Merrill: Discussion on the railroad box cars located on the site for Merrill Park. General
discussion.
5. City Engineer Report: No report.
6. City Clerk/Treasurer Report: The sport court at Friendship Park is installed.
Reminder of the Joint Meeting with ACHD on Monday, September 10, 2001, at ACHD. Council
concurs that they don't need to have the meeting.
Discussion on additional lighting along Floating Feather Road in conjunction with the
improvements being made by ACHD. Council concurs there is not a need for additional lighting.
7. Zoning Administrator's Report:
Update on Oakley Estates, Stan Ray's development, I noticed that much of the landscaping ready
to be planted was undersized. Discussion was had with Stan Ray about the specimens that they
were planting. Discussion on the landscaping plan and the size of the plantings. Many of the
trees that were not yet planted were very small. Stan Ray indicated that he made an agreement
with Council that if some were bigger and taller that some could then be smaller. I indicated to
him that regardless of what he felt were agreements that he had, I was charged with following
this approval and the Code and that was what we intend to do. I am just making the Council
aware of the situation. General discussion.
We received a request from a large farmers market that would like to locate in Eagle. Their first
choice was the Ranch Building site and they were told that a farmers market would not be
approved at that location because of noncompliance. They are looking for another site. General
discussion.
The house on blocks at Trolley Square is going to be moved Friday or next week.
Reports on the development of the Monroc property and the alignment of Highway 55.
Reports on the sidewalk extension along Chinden Blvd. Displays an overhead of the site plan-
sidewalk extension, Chinden Blvd and discusses the sidewalk extension. General discussion.
Update on measuring building heights.
Update on Eagle Forum lights. General discussion.
8. City Attorney Report: We are working on the tree ordinance.
10. ADJOURNMENT:
Sedlacek moves to adjourn. Seconded by Merrill. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES...
Hearing no further business, the Council meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
MAYOR ~
Cc
Thursday, August 23, 2001
E-mail to: Payette River Scenic Byway Advisory Committee:
We are in the final stages with Payette River Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan.
A final document was reformatted to print front/back to make this a user -friendlier
document. Tables, figures, and supporting maps were then referenced in the text and
combined into a final Appendix, to aid those who really wanted to "refer" to this
information. No content changes have been made, other than the minor editing
comments received during the August public input/hearings.
After submitting the final document to and talking with Garry Young today (Idaho
Transportation Department Scenic Byway Coordinator) he did say he needs your formal
Letter of Adoption or Resolution of Adoption by Wednesday September 5, 2001. I
know you are all currently working on this with agenda items but I didn't have a firm
date until now when those were needed. These Letters of Adoption or Resolutions will
show the 1TD board that each of the participating entities not only participated in the
effort but each agrees with and adopts it's content.. If you mail these to me prior to that
time I will submit all to him.
This plan document will be presented to the Idaho Scenic Byway Advisory Committee on
September 11, 2001 at 10 am. Hugh Somerton and Tom Kerr have already agreed to
attend that meeting with me to address any questions. Based on receiving a favorable
recommendation from that advisory body, it will then be placed on the Idaho
Transportation Department Board agenda on September 20th for formal state -level
approval. You have all done an amazing job, as reflected in this document, and I
anticipate the above approvals will proceed smoothly (with those adoption letters
attached).
You have made a tremendous investment of time and energy thus far. No other statewide
scenic byway has involved so many distinct communities. That same cooperative
strength will be essential as you move into administration and implementation, forever
enhancing this wonderful canyon and benefiting everyone along the way.
Don't forget...prior to September 5th mail to me:
• Adoption Letter or Resolution for Payette River Scenic Byway Corridor
Management Plan
• Signatures to the Memorandum of Agreement by all entities involved (Tom Kerr
is coordinating this so please make any arrangements with him and he will get to
me)
We're almost through this important first step — the plan!
Pat L. Engel
Planning Specialist
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Payette River Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan could not have been completed
without the hundreds of hours of time given by the Advisory Council and members of the
Intrinsic Quality, Transportation, and Community Management Subcommittees. THANK
YOU FOR YOUR DEDICATION AND SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT!
Advisory Council
Chair: Hugh Somerton, City of Donnelly
Mary Allen, Central Idaho Cultural Center
Jim Arp, City of McCall
Nichoel Spencer (Alternate), Ada County
Richard Beyers, Horseshoe Bend City Council
Bill Brown, Adams County Commissioner
Jon Cooper, Cooper's Wood Wildlife
Margaret Drake (Alternate), Boise County
Linnea Hall, New Meadows Chamber
Intrinsic Quality Subcommittee
Mary Allen
Pam Brown
Carl Broadbent
Jon Cooper
Margaret Drake
Community Management Subcommittee
Celeste Becia
Gary Blaylock
Tom Faull
Philip Morton
Transportation Subcommittee
Les Ankenman
Lloyd Campbell
Jim and Joan Cochrane
Dale Hanson, Boise County Commission
Ronn Julian, Boise National Forest
Sheldon Keafer, Idaho State Dept. of Lands
Tom Kerr, Valley County Commissioner
Jim Mayfield, City of Cascade
Jeff Patlovich, Ada County
Lloyd Perrin, Mayor, City of New Meadows
Bruce Reay, Private Citizen
Lynne Sedlacek, Eagle City Council
Duane Smith (Alternate), City of McCall
Cindy Fry
Linnea Hall
Debbi Long
Kathy Riley
Beth Klijajic
Greg Seibert
Bonnie Shikrallah
Hugh Somerton
Kelly Urbanak
Nicole Dovel
Dale Hanson
Tom Kerr
In addition, special thanks go to:
• Jason Pfaff and Spatial Dynamics for their work on the mapping and logo.
• Susie Osgood from the Boise National Forest for writing Chapter II of this document.
• Steve Stoddard from the Central Idaho Cultural Center for his work on Chapter II.
• Steve Klatt for his assistance in organizing the subcommittees.
• Kirk Keogh for sharing his photos (kirkkeogh:lwanderlust outther! 208-343-1750).
Thank you also to the Idaho Transportation Department resource people:
• Garry Young
• Jonathan Hennings
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
Chapter I: Introduction to the Payette River Scenic Byway. 1-1
A. Welcome to the Payette River Scenic Byway 1-1
B. Overview of the Payette River Scenic Byway 1-2
Chapter II: Heritage of the Payette River Scenic Byway 2-1
A. Introduction 2-1
B. Supplying the Mines 2-1
C. The Bend in the River 2-1
D. The Snake Brigades 2-2
E. Eagle Eye and Indian Charley 2-4
F. Banks: The Humble Homestead 2-5
G. Tie Cutters and Splash Dams 2-6
H. Smiths Ferry 2-7
I. SITPA and the Idaho Idea 2-8
J. Rainbow Bridge: The Great Depression and the
Works Progress Administration 2-10
K. Round Valley and the Indian Potato 2-11
L. Alpha: The First Settlement 2-11
M. Cabarton: The Company Town 2-12
N. Ho, for Thunder Mountain! Idaho's Last Gold Rush 2-13
O. The First Inhabitants 2-14
P. Crawford and Van Wyck: The Lost Towns 2-15
Q. Cascade: A Recreation Metropolis 2-17
R. Roseberry: A Lot of Pride for a Little Community 2-17
S. The Finnish Legacy in Long Valley 2-18
T. Lardo and McCall 2-19
U. Packer John Park 2-21
V. Meadows Valley and the Ambitious Colonel Heighho 2-21
Chapter 111: The Payette River Scenic Byway Today 3-1
A. Designation as a State Scenic Byway 3-1
B. Intrinsic Qualities on the Payette River Scenic Byway 3-2
C. Defining the Byway Corridor 3-4
Chapter IV: The Planning Process 4-1
A. Catalyst for a Corridor Management Plan 4-1
B. The Payette River Scenic Byway Advisory Council 4-1
C. Payette River Scenic Byway Mission Statement and
Areas of Focus 4-2
D. Subcommittee Responsibilities and Goals 4-3
Figure 4-1: Organizational Flow Chart 4-5
E. Community Input Meetings 4-8
F. Coordination with Other Planning Efforts 4-9
Chapter V: Traffic on the Payette River Scenic Byway 5-1
A. The Payette River Scenic Byway Today 5-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
Chapter V: Traffic on the Payette River Scenic Byway (Cont.)
B. Traffic Volumes 5-1
Figure 5-1: Annual Average Daily Traffic
Counts (1997-1998) 5-2
Figure 5-2: Annual Average Daily Traffic
Counts (1991-1999) 5-3
Table 5-1: Commercial Traffic Counts
(1991-1999) 5-4
Figure 5-3: Percentage of Commercial Traffic
(1991-1999) 5-5
C. Safety and Accidents 5-5
Table 5-2: Accident Study SH 44 & 55 to
SH 55 & US 95 (1995-1999) 5-6
Figure 5-4: Top 10 Percent of Actual Accidents
(1995-1999) 5-9
Figure 5-5: Top 10 Percent of Actual Hazards
by Mile marker 5-10
D. Summary of Traffic Data 5-10
Chapter VI: Interpreting the Payette River Scenic Byway 6-1
A. Attractions and Points of Interest 6-1
Table 6-1: Comprehensive Points of Interest List 6-3
Table 6-2: Top Points of Interest 6-6
B. Modes of Interpretation 6-13
C. Centers to be Developed 6-15
D. Interpretation of the Scenic Byway 6-16
Chapter VII:
Recreation'Oh the Pa vette River SeeriiQ Byway (pending eor pi # 8 ;
A. Recreational pOcftunities. ... ,
ti.Wnd rs g ad•i:�ngo nRe lsse.�; 1oy
b � e k g. Y it
Chapter VIII: Transportation: Designing a Safer Byway 8-1
A. Setting Project Priorities 8-1
B. Proposed Project List 8-1
Table 8-1 8-3
C. Local Changes to the Highway (Use of Present
Right -of -Way): Passing Lanes, Widening, and
Intersection Projects 8-7
D. Major Changes to the Highway (Development of New
Right -of -Way): Alternate Routes, Major Rerouting, and
Other Bypasses 8-7
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
Chapter IX: Community Management and Promotion 9-1
A. Community Development Along the Payette River Scenic
Byway 9-1
Table 9-1: Community Project List 9-3
Figure 9-1: Phase I: Two -Year Promotional
Plan 9-4
Figure 9-2: Phase II: Long -Term Promotional
Plan (3-10 Years) 9-5
Chapter X: Implementation of the Corridor Management Plan 10-1
A. Prioritized Projects 10-1
Table 10-1: Project List 10-2
B. Promoting the Payette River Scenic Byway 10-7
Table 10-2: Situational Analysis Matrix
Example 10-13
C. Conclusion 10-14
Appendices:
Appendix A - Maps
Appendix B - Committee Members
Appendix C - Transportation Information
Appendix D - Website Application
Appendix E — Board of Directors' Rules of Operation
Thursday, August 23, 2001
E-mail to: Payette River Scenic Byway Advisory Committee:
We are in the final stages with Payette River Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan.
A final document was reformatted to print front/back to make this a user -friendlier
document. Tables, figures, and supporting maps were then referenced in the text and
combined into a final Appendix, to aid those who really wanted to "refer" to this
information. No content changes have been made, other than the minor editing
comments received during the August public input/hearings.
After submitting the final document to and talking with Garry Young today (Idaho
Transportation Department Scenic Byway Coordinator) he did say he needs your formal
Letter of Adoption or Resolution of Adoption by Wednesday September 5, 2001. I
know you are all currently working on this with agenda items but I didn't have a firm
date until now when those were needed. These Letters of Adoption or Resolutions will
show the ITD board that each of the participating entities not only participated in the
effort but each agrees with and adopts it's content.. If you mail these to me prior to that
time 1 will submit all to him.
This plan document will be presented to the Idaho Scenic Byway Advisory Committee on
September 11, 2001 at 10 am. Hugh Somerton and Tom Kerr have already agreed to
attend that meeting with me to address any questions. Based on receiving a favorable
recommendation from that advisory body, it will then be placed on the Idaho
Transportation Department Board agenda on September 20t for formal state -level
approval. You have all done an amazing job, as reflected in this document, and I
anticipate the above approvals will proceed smoothly (with those adoption letters
attached).
You have made a tremendous investment of time and energy thus far. No other statewide
scenic byway has involved so many distinct communities. That same cooperative
strength will be essential as you move into administration and implementation, forever
enhancing this wonderful canyon and benefiting everyone along the way.
Don't forget...prior to September 5th mail to me:
• Adoption Letter or Resolution for Payette River Scenic Byway Corridor
Management Plan
• Signatures to the Memorandum of Agreement by all entities involved (Tom Kerr
is coordinating this so please make any arrangements with him and he will get to
me)
We're almost through this important first step — the plan!
Pat L. Engel
Planning Specialist
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Payette River Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan could not have been completed
without the hundreds of hours of time given by the Advisory Council and members of the
Intrinsic Quality, Transportation, and Community Management Subcommittees. THANK
YOU FOR YOUR DEDICATION AND SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT!
Advisory Council
Chair: Hugh Somerton, City of Donnelly
Mary Allen, Central Idaho Cultural Center
Jim Arp, City of McCall
Nichoel Spencer (Alternate), Ada County
Richard Beyers, Horseshoe Bend City Council
Bill Brown, Adams County Commissioner
Jon Cooper, Cooper's Wood Wildlife
Margaret Drake (Alternate), Boise County
Linnea Hall, New Meadows Chamber
Intrinsic Quality Subcommittee
Mary Allen
Pam Brown
Carl Broadbent
Jon Cooper
Margaret Drake
Community Management Subcommittee
Celeste Becia
Gary Blaylock
Tom Faull
Philip Morton
Transportation Subcommittee
Les Ankenman
Lloyd Campbell
Jim and Joan Cochrane
Dale Hanson, Boise County Commission
Ronn Julian, Boise National Forest
Sheldon Keafer, Idaho State Dept. of Lands
Tom Kerr, Valley County Commissioner
Jim Mayfield, City of Cascade
Jeff Patlovich, Ada County
Lloyd Perrin, Mayor, City of New Meadows
Bruce Reay, Private Citizen
Lynne Sedlacek, Eagle City Council
Duane Smith (Alternate), City of McCall
Cindy Fry
Linnea Hall
Debbi Long
Kathy Riley
Beth Klijajic
Greg Seibert
Bonnie Shikrallah
Hugh Somerton
Kelly Urbanak
Nicole Dovel
Dale Hanson
Tom Kerr
In addition, special thanks go to:
• Jason Pfaff and Spatial Dynamics for their work on the mapping and logo.
• Susie Osgood from the Boise National Forest for writing Chapter II of this document.
• Steve Stoddard from the Central Idaho Cultural Center for his work on Chapter 11.
• Steve Klatt for his assistance in organizing the subcommittees.
• Kirk Keogh for sharing his photos (kirkkeogh:lwanderlust outtherl 208-343-1750).
Thank you also to the Idaho Transportation Department resource people:
• Garry Young
• Jonathan Hennings
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
Chapter I: Introduction to the Payette River Scenic Byway. 1-1
A. Welcome to the Payette River Scenic Byway 1-1
B. Overview of the Payette River Scenic Byway 1-2
Chapter II: Heritage of the Payette River Scenic Byway 2-1
A. Introduction 2-1
B. Supplying the Mines 2-1
C. The Bend in the River 2-1
D. The Snake Brigades 2-2
E. Eagle Eye and Indian Charley 2-4
F. Banks: The Humble Homestead 2-5
G. Tie Cutters and Splash Dams 2-6
H. Smiths Ferry 2-7
I. SITPA and the Idaho Idea 2-8
J. Rainbow Bridge: The Great Depression and the
Works Progress Administration 2-10
K. Round Valley and the Indian Potato 2-11
L. Alpha: The First Settlement 2-11
M. Cabarton: The Company Town 2-12
N. Ho, for Thunder Mountain! Idaho's Last Gold Rush 2-13
O. The First Inhabitants 2-14
P. Crawford and Van Wyck: The Lost Towns 2-15
Q. Cascade: A Recreation Metropolis 2-17
R. Roseberry: A Lot of Pride for a Little Community 2-17
S. The Finnish Legacy in Long Valley 2-18
T. Lardo and McCall 2-19
U. Packer John Park 2-21
V. Meadows Valley and the Ambitious Colonel Heighho 2-21
Chapter III: The Payette River Scenic Byway Today 3-1
A. Designation as a State Scenic Byway 3-1
B. Intrinsic Qualities on the Payette River Scenic Byway 3-2
C. Defining the Byway Corridor 3-4
Chapter IV: The Planning Process 4-1
A. Catalyst for a Corridor Management Plan 4-1
B. The Payette River Scenic Byway Advisory Council 4-1
C. Payette River Scenic Byway Mission Statement and
Areas of Focus 4-2
D. Subcommittee Responsibilities and Goals 4-3
Figure 4-1: Organizational Flow Chart 4-5
E. Community Input Meetings 4-8
F. Coordination with Other Planning Efforts 4-9
Chapter V: Traffic on the Payette River Scenic Byway 5-1
A. The Payette River Scenic Byway Today 5-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
Chapter V: Traffic on the Payette River Scenic Byway (Cont.)
B. Traffic Volumes 5-1
Figure 5-1: Annual Average Daily Traffic
Counts (1997-1998) 5-2
Figure 5-2: Annual Average Daily Traffic
Counts (1991-1999) 5-3
Table 5-1: Commercial Traffic Counts
(1991-1999) 5-4
Figure 5-3: Percentage of Commercial Traffic
(1991-1999) 5-5
C. Safety and Accidents 5-5
Table 5-2: Accident Study SH 44 & 55 to
SH 55 & US 95 (1995-1999) 5-6
Figure 5-4: Top 10 Percent of Actual Accidents
(1995-1999) 5-9
Figure 5-5: Top 10 Percent of Actual Hazards
by Mile marker 5-10
D. Summary of Traffic Data 5-10
Chapter VI: Interpreting the Payette River Scenic Byway 6-1
A. Attractions and Points of Interest 6-1
Table 6-1: Comprehensive Points of Interest List 6-3
Table 6-2: Top Points of Interest 6-6
B. Modes of Interpretation 6-13
C. Centers to be Developed 6-15
D. Interpretation of the Scenic Byway 6-16
Chapter VII: Recreation on the Payette River. Scenic ;Byway. (pencdirtg .cc »1
A:. Recreational Opportunities .:..i. `• 4. •.+ :.
B. Understanding and_Mitigatin
Table.Health nd of ty
Issues 44'A K:
Table 72: , Pul'lwaenss'��-:.
it
�ti�:,
,•ii:L i •• it i�i•• •i'�i'.•
ec ea io l Relateo ISsu
Chapter VIII: Transportation: Designing a Safer Byway 8-1
A. Setting Project Priorities 8-1
B. Proposed Project List 8-1
Table 8-1 8-3
C. Local Changes to the Highway (Use of Present
Right -of -Way): Passing Lanes, Widening, and
Intersection Projects 8-7
D. Major Changes to the Highway (Development of New
Right -of -Way): Alternate Routes, Major Rerouting, and
Other Bypasses 8-7
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
Chapter IX: Community Management and Promotion 9-1
A. Community Development Along the Payette River Scenic
Byway 9-1
Table 9-1: Community Project List 9-3
Figure 9-1: Phase I: Two -Year Promotional
Plan 9-4
Figure 9-2: Phase II: Long -Term Promotional
Plan (3-10 Years) 9-5
Chapter X: Implementation of the Corridor Management Plan 10-1
A. Prioritized Projects 10-1
Table 10-1: Project List 10-2
B. Promoting the Payette River Scenic Byway 10-7
Table 10-2: Situational Analysis Matrix
Example 10-13
C. Conclusion 10-14
Appendices:
Appendix A - Maps
Appendix B - Committee Members
Appendix C - Transportation Information
Appendix D - Website Application
Appendix E — Board of Directors' Rules of Operation
cc r'.2-,9""°1
City of Eagle
Ada County Sheriffs Office
Month End Report for July 2001
Presented to: Mayor Rick Yzaguirre
On Behalf of: Sheriff Vaughn Killeen
By: Sgt. Patrick Calley
Sergeant Patrick Colley
July — Education Program, reference: Jake Brakes.
July 3 — Security Awareness at Buster's Restaurant.
July 3 — City facilities Committee presentation at City Council.
July 9 — Emergency Response Team training.
July 9 — Emergency Response Team operations planning meeting.
July 10-12 — Training: Mastering Performance Leadership.
July 12 — Emergency Response Team operations planning meeting.
July 13 — Emergency Training Team warrant service.
July 16 — Field Services Division Staff meeting.
July 16 — Traffic Enforcement Program State Highway 44 and 55.
July 17 — City Council meeting.
July 18 — Eagle Kiwanis event planning meeting (Cruise Night).
July 18 — Eagle Kiwanis Charter Ceremony.
July 19 — Firearms training.
July 20 — Traffic Enforcement Program State Highway 44.
July 24 — Training: Automated External Defibrillator for CPR.
July 25 — City Council workshop presentation.
July 27 — Emergency Response Team testing.
Deputy Dana Borgquist
July 2 — Began gathering names of presidents of Homeowner Associations with Terisa.
July 10 — Spoke to Chamber on business safety issues.
July 12 — Attended critical incident training for school shooting scenario.
July 12 — Street light project: made contact with residents on Harlan and Riverview to set up a meeting.
July 23-27 — Attended training. Class was `Instructor Development Course" by Peace Officer Standards
in Training to become a qualified instructor.
Deputy Matt Buie
July 4 — Assisted with a neighborhood Independence Day parade at the Eagle Knoll Estates.
July 12 — Attended a critical incident training session at Eagle Middle School with Ada County student
resource officers. Instruction was given by Detective Cortez (Eagle High Resource Officer).
The training involved movement scenarios in the case of a school shooting.
July 12 — Talked with 20 daycare kids at substation. Showed them the equipment in the cars and talked
with them about being a police officer and safety issues.
Deputy John Dewey
July 19 — Firearms training.
July 22 — Worked with Deputy Winegar on contacting Sun Valley Police Department reference bike
registration program. Information is being sent to us. Tentative plans for program are being
made for October 1.
July 27 — Tested for Emergency Response Team.
July — Vacation.
Deputy Craig Durrell
Deputy Luis Gutierrez
July 17 — Firearms training.
July 9 — Emergency Response Team training.
Deputy John Harris
July 10-12 — Attended training, Mastering Performance Leadership.
July 20 — Firearms training.
July 27 — Tested for Emergency Response Team.
Deputy Jon McDaniel
July 20 — Spoke with Principal Susan Leigh at Seven Oaks Elementary reference minor problems at
school while school resource officer is gone.
July 27 — Passed out "Know Your Money" posters to businesses. These show how to tell if money is
counterfeit by threads, watermarks and other distinctions.
July 30 — Spoke to a drivers training class of 20 students. Answered questions, showed them pictures of
accidents and talked about general driving safety.
Deputy Jeff Winegar
July 19 — Firearms training.
July 22 — Worked with Deputy Dewey on getting information from Sun Valley Police Department
reference bike registration program. Information is being sent to us and there are tentative plans
for starting the program in October.
July 27 — Tested for Emergency Response Team.
Field Service Technician, Terisa Howell
July 2 — Began working on a list of Homeowner Association Presidents. Working with Deputy
Borgquist to get to know more citizens and be more involved in neighborhood activities.
July — Made phone calls to find more Homeowner presidents. City Council member Nancy Merrill is
also helping with this project.
July 10 — Went to Chamber of Commerce and asked local businesses to sponsor deputies for trading
cards. These will be used for positive reinforcement for kids doing the right thing.
July — Called business for sponsors. Talked with other people to get the trading cards all ordered.
July 27 — Went to City Hall to meet with Justin Alderson about City of Eagle website. Learned how to
update monthly activity page. Will be maintaining the Sheriff s page of the website.
Detective Todd Jolliffe (Eagle Academy)
July 3 — Finished report on a case. Did follow-up on other cases assigned.
July 5 — Training at Lake Hazel Middle School.
July 6 — Interviewed some people on cases, homeowner turned over meth during interview.
July 9 — Detectives meeting. More interviews and reports.
July 11-13 — Burglary stings in Eagle.
July 16 — Detectives meeting. Interviews.
July 19 — Firearms training.
July 23 — Sting operation in Two Rivers and Island Woods.
July 24 — Sting operation in Eagle Hills and Two Rivers.
July 26 — Training at Kuna High School. Interviews.
July 27 — Tested for Emergency Response Team.
Detective John Murray (Eagle Middle School)
July 5 — Attended training at Lake Hazel Middle School.
July 9 — Detectives meeting.
July 16 — Detectives meeting.
July 26 — Training at Kuna High School.
July Monthly Comparisons
June July
6
1
1
16
0
11
2
0
1
2
Misdemeanor Arrests
Felony Arrests
DUI Arrests
Warrant Arrests
City Ordinance Citations
Non -Injury Accidents _
Injury Accidents
Skateboard Violations
Tobacco
Parking Citations
8
2
4
10
3
10
3
1
1
1
Injury Accidents
July 1 = Linder/State
July 14 = Aminita (2nd & Mission)
July 25 = State (Monroc)
Non -injury Accidents
July 1 = Mango (Yellow Pine & Longwood)
July 4 = Floating Feather/Prestwick
July 6 = Highway 55/State
July 14 = Floating Feather
July 14 = N 2nd/Aminita
July 22 = Belgrave/Parkforest
July 24 = Chinden (trailer hit guardrail)
July 25 = Riverside/State
July 30 = Eagle/South Channel
July 31 = Floating Feather/Park Forest
July 2001
Vehicle Burglary
Residential Burglary
Commercial Burglary
Construction Site Burglary
Grand Theft
Petit Theft
Malicious Injury to Property
'TOTALS
June -2001
Vehicle Burglary
Residential Burglary
Commercial Burglary
Construction Site Burglary
Grand Theft
Petit Theft
Malicious Injury to Property
TOTALS
May -2001
Vehicle Burglary
Residential Burglary
Commercial Burglary
Construction Site Burglary
Grand Theft
Petit Theft
Malicious Injury to Property 1
1
i
TOTALS
April -2001
Vehicle Burglary
Residential Burglary
Commercial Burglary
Construction Site Burglary
Grand Theft
Petit Theft
Malicious Injury to Property
TOTALS
Star =RD 91 Kuna=RD 129
EagleRD 87 BSU=RD 822
ADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT
PROPERTY CRIME COMPARISON
1 2 3 4 5 STAR BSU EAGLE
4 3 8 14 1 0 2 10
1 3 5 9 0 1 0 2
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 4
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
3 0 6 0 2 0 4 2
3 0 14 3 2 0 5 7
5 3 16 16 8 0 6 5
17 10 50 42 15 1 18 31
1 2 3 4 51 STAR BSU EAGLE
3 6 4 7 3 0 2 2
2 2 3 2 0 1 0 3
2 0 1 3 0 0 0 3
1 0 0 0 1 0 0+ 2
I
1 0 2 2 3 0 1 2
4 4 2 10 4 0 9 6
4 1 13 21 5 3 1 7
17 13 25 45 16 4 13 25
1
2
1
3
1
2
6
0
1 15
1
1
0
3
5
0
0
4
6
18
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
3
3
7
2
9
2
5
9
10
44
3
9
4
7
1
1
10
5
37
4
5
5
0
2
0
7
12
31
4
5
6
0
1
5
6
5
28
1
KUNA!
4
2
1
1
0
6
3
17
KUNA
14
1
1
1
0
6
5
28
5 STAR BSU EAGLE KUNAI
1 1 3 8 4
2 0 1 2 2
0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0
3 1 0 5 1
3 1 6 9 3
3 2 5 9 4
12 1 5 16 34 15
5 STAR BSU EAGLE KUNAI
10 1 3 5 2
1 0 0 3 1
1 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 0
3 0 4 1 0
1 1 5 6 3
6 0 3 7 5
22 2 j15 24 11
1
Revised 8/28/01
March-2001 1 2
Vehicle Burglary 1 2
Residential Burglary 0 0
Commercial Burglary 3 5
Construction Site Burglary 1 0
Grand Theft 1 0
Petit Theft 5 3
Malicious Injury to Property 4 2
TOTALS 15 1 12
3
15
2
1
0
0
5
10
33
4
5
5
1
1
2
6
9
29
5
1
1
2
0
2
1
6
13
STAR BSU EAGLE KUNA!
0 1 7 12
0 0 3 2
0 0 0 2
0 0 2 0
0 1 3 2
2 8 4 2
1 3 10 2
3 + 13 + 29 22
February -2001 1 2 3 4 5 STAR BSU EAGLE KUNA 1
Vehicle Burglary 4 U 14 4 1 U 1 6 b
Residential Burglary 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 1
Commercial Burglary 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Construction Site Burglary 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0
Grand Theft 0 0 7 2 1 0 1 0 1
Petit Theft 2 0 6 2 0 0 7 4 1
Malicious Injury to Property 6 3 9 10 2 0 2 2 6
U I HLJ
'la .i .JU t1 4 U It l 'I0 'ID
Star =RD 91 Kun�RD 129
Eagle =RD 87 BSU=RD 822
2 Revised 8/28/01
Atd(A- St7,
*E---
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
File:
Route to:
An 2 3 2001
Cc- g"---2
itadA .2474 -t -due—'
AAA.,
tr-441,1-44--
,o251"-/ ekt,74-4/1-.
fe-W-
ilged-0-:
Q3C-754
fli--3_j4-21-A-414 A212 --
r
HISTORY
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
AU3 2 4 20C1
File•
Bakers Acres Subdivision was developed in 1974 as a 5 -Acre Subdivision. The lo s matenid with that
understanding. Covenants were put into place to allow changes to be made by an f:
lot owners.
Developers contacted us on March 8, 2001 as to their intent to buy the property and develop it. Those of us
present who are currently living in Bakers Acres were unanimous in our opposition to their plan. At that
time, we undertook the process of strengthening our covenants. Our intent was to make very clear what we
all thought was clear in the beginning It took nearly 6 weeks to complete the amendments to the
covenants.
In the Zoning meeting on June 18, Mr. Dave Roylance stated that it appeared we had changed our
covenants after they bought the land on April 10t• We filed our change to the covenants on April 18 with
Ada County. This was one day before the developers submitted their plan to Eagle Zoning and at that time
we did not know that the property had been purchased by the developers. The developers had been
forewarned that we would pursue any legal means possible to oppose them.
The three 5 acre lots in question were kept in the Baker Family and were never for sale as 5- acre lots. We
tried to buy the 5 acres on our west side but were told by Mrs. Nona Baker that the 15 acres was in a family
trust and would not be sold until she died. The developers bought this 15 acres on one deed but the legal
description is 3 separate 5- acre parcels.
Mr. Roylance stated at the City Zoning hearing that subdivisions are re -subdivided all the time, so this is
nothing out of the ordinary. I submit to you, those living in the subdivision should make this decision. Not
by a group of developers who have little regard as to the effect on remaining properties. It should be noted
that all those currently living in Bakers Acres, with the exception of Mrs. Baker (who has taken a neutral
position), have backed the amended covenants. All agreeing to keep lots the same size as recorded on the
original plat.
Mr. Roylance was unsure as to which took precedence, the Comprehensive Plan or the Subdivision
Covenants. I submit to you that the Comprehensive Plan is merely a guideline and that the Subdivision
Covenants are a legally binding document.
Lots 15 and 16 are constantly being referred to as split lots. The Bakers told the owners of those lots that
they were buying two 2.5 -acre lots. They each ended up buying 1/2 of lot 15 and 1/2 of lot 16 due to the
location of Baker's first two houses. All other lots were sold as approximately 5 -acre lots.
Finally, there seems to be considerable misunderstanding as to the 12 proposed lots on each 5 -acre parcel.
These are simply proposed lot lines, if those in the subdivision were in favor of re -subdividing and if the
City allowed it. Then and only then would it become a possibility. If this re -subdivision is approved, then
any lot or group of lots can develop in any manner.
Greg Holmes
1553 Hereford Drive
Eagle, ID 83616
08/23/2001 13:07 9396118
August 23, 2001
DATD
Development Services Inc.
Jeff T. Lowe
City of Eagle Planning and Zoning
PO Box 477
Eagle, Idaho 83616
PAGE 01
340 W. State Street
Eagle, Idaho 83616
208-939-6000
208-939-6118 FAX
EMAIL: devservices@aol.com
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
U3 2 3 2001
Fll o,- - A-2
Route to: M /Of)
RE: RZ-2-01/PP-3-01
Cedro Glen Estates Subdivison
Dear Jeff:
We would like to request a continuance of the above referenced project to the September 25, 2001 City Council
meeting.
There were several issues that came up at the Planning and Zoning meeting (which were used for denial) that
need to be addressed. We still need to obtain more information from the irrigation district. We understand that
the agenda on September 11th is quite full and therefore request continuance until September 25, 2001. We will
need the extra time in order to prepare for and properly present information to City Council on this project.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and understanding.
Sincerely,
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC.
by,
JEAN G. CARIAGA
/j gc
1:\DevelopmcntScrviccs\prof ccts\ecdroglenestates\citycounci Icontinuance82301.doc
c c- �'� �'-�l f_t'
Land Consultants Inc.
52 N. 2ad Street • Eagle, Idaho 83616 • Office 208.938.3812 • Fax 208.938.5873
Date: August 23, 2001
To: Mayor Rick Yzaguirre
City Council Members
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
AUG 2 3 2001
File.
Route to:
Just some items of clarification on the Ringo Ridge Subdivision (Formerly Arbor Ridge) Phase One
Final Plat staff report.
Bullet 1 page 2: Our Engineer, Mike Liimikka, with the Land Group, has attempted several times to
obtain the letter from Farmers Union stating that the property owner has no water rights for this
property and the District has refused to provide the requested letter. Please consider this situation, I
remember it happening in the past with the Farmer's Union District. Our documents do show we have
no water rights for Phase 1.
Bullet 2 Page 2: My understanding is that the irrigation water is not generated from our subdivision, it
is from the Echo Hawk Subdivision. Also, just a matter of semantics, but we are not routing the water
to the City property, it is already routed that way now and has been for years. Lastly, we don't
propose to discharge on the City property, what we had proposed, was to leave the water flowing as it
has traditionally done in the past, but per request of the City we are looking at other alternatives and
hope to have a positive answer for the City as Bill Vaughan has mentioned in the report. We
appreciate him working with us on this issue.
Thank you for considering this item!
Mark L. Butler
Land Consultants, Inc.
Page 1 of 1
C1My DocumadstaatseDocsta Lomedhead d=
AUG -27-2001 07:58
LAND CONSULTANTS INC 200 938 5873 P.01/01
Land Consultants Inc.c e -,,2? -6 /7/-
222E State Street • Suite B • Fogle Idaho 83616 • Office 208.938.3812 • Fax 208.939.7321
Date: August 27, 2001
TO: City of Eagle
310 E. State Street
FaP, ID 83616
RE: DR -34-01
RECEIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
AUG 2 8 23O
Fila
Route to: 7#/7 i
Dear Mayor Yzaguirre and City Council Members,
I would like this item pulled from the consent agenda for discussion of the Design Review Board's
Item #10 regarding fencing I am confused on the requirement.
We want to put in the fence required in the Council Fundings Condition #17 to help with Mr. Glubay
and Mr. Pardues request but we do not want to put a fence around the entire subdivision as 1 believe
the Design Review Board Condition #10 suggests We will explain why at the meting_
Thank you_
Sincerely,
L. Butler
Page t at i
cwrc ++umm. surra aba
TOTAL P.01
0Q,c-I41)> 11.1tnI—a1--w0
1-84 Corridor Study -phase 2
presentation to Eagle Council Chamber
August 28, 2001
overview of the Major Conclusions
• Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
• Capital Improvement projects
• Funding Needs and potential Shortfall
1-84 Corridor Study, Phase 2
Transportation Demand
Management Element
The intent of the Transportation
Demand Management element is to
implement the 25% goal for
alternative transportation in the 1-84
corridor over the next 20 years
Assumptions for 25% Goal
• Target commute trips during the peak hour
• Apply the 25% goal to the most heavily traveled
section of 1-84 (west of the Wye Interchange)
• Increase transit rider ship from the current level of 1
to 5% by 2020
• Increase vanpool and carpool use from the current
level of 10% to 12% by 2020
• The increases in transit and rideshare would result in
25% use of alternate transportation by 2020
o,
/o
sx
a)
E
E
® I MIDDLETON
Hwv 44
ple Saco Rd
Distribution of 2020 Projected Traffic on 1-84 west of the Wye
Projected Peak Hour Trips =14,800
W6
BEE GCI l i ru r
Lincoln RI
CALDWELL
y � i
\
ISTAR
1
FLQ j71Nr f FA
Hwv2026
b.
MGM CLAN
EAGLE
rklINDEN
i
GARDEN CITY
Lick Rd
MERIDIAN
L
Jr -
BOISE
J1
F PnwaLLit,A RC _YLr[QRY
NAMPA
n
AIu117�V
IAiFHA2F1
ill Il RIA
}
Missouri Ave
Kuna Rd
KUNA
Funding Sources
Description
Express Bus
Service
Park & Ride Lot
Commuter Vans
Marketing and
Employer Programs
Transit ITS
Total
Type
Capital
O&M
Capital
Capital
O&M
Operations
Capital
Cost Eligible Sources
$12,300,000 Federal
$78,700,000 Fare & Local Revenue
$ 13,300,000 Federal
$ 700,000 Federal
$ 7,100,000 Fare Revenue
$ 4,000,000 Federal
$10,000,000 Federal
$126,300,000
Additional TDM Items
• Public transit service between Canyon County
and Meridian
. Rail Corridor Preservation
• High Occupant Vehicle (HOV) lanes
Interstate 84 Corridor Study
Final Phase
Agenda Item IV
44.
!, • :
' • ' • •
I 11.1. . 1 . 1 I I
I IIJII.I 1 1.111I1111,1 I 1 II 11 11 I milli 11111iLiti 11 ..111i..10111.1.111 1 11 it
ould4-
• .4. IrirrirrilF2'.. rjr""t"..44; 4.-.1114-
4% 4 i •7411111.11 z:••.
ffr.
• Corridor Improvement Plan:
Projects, Schedule and Costs
Corridor Improvement Projects
Committed Projects
I-84 Mainline- Notus Exit to Centennial Way
Additional Lanes
J,
Franklin Road IC
Intersection Improvements
IcOck Rc
Locust Grove Road
New Overpass
Karcher Road IC
INew Interchange
1 rrn4 Li
Garrity Blvd IC
Intersection Improvements
Li hi
• Committed Projects with
Full Funding
OCommitted Projects with
Partial Funding
Le Had Rd
cdurrbi and
Fiubb^d Rd
Cee Flat Rd
J
Wye Interchange
Additional Lanes
Gowen Interchange
Ramp Improvements
2
Corridor Improvement Projects
- Year 2010 -
a
!sock Fit
',von. !
=rankFn {i
8 Travel Lanes
6 Travel Lanes
rrernhrtsl Rd
L (e. Ham Rd
Col urr N 42d
Interchange — Reconstruct (Add P and R Lots)
Interchange - New (Add P and R Lots)
Roadway Widening or HOV Lanes
6+2 Travel Lanes
3
Corridor Improvement Projects
Year 2015
,H 44
F
6 Travel Lanes I
rrnisl L
ichck Rd
rnrrprI r
rankhn
(Nadal
6 Travel Lanes
1 4(e Fix -1 Rd
IN
Ozi udbt Rd
Interchange — Reconstruct (Add P and R Lots)
O Interchange - New (Add P and R Lots)
Roadway Widening or HOV Lanes
4
Corridor Improvement Projects
8 Travel Lanes
N
jlaKen ,.
I8 Travel Lanes
/\ Interchange — Reconstruct (Add P and R Lots)
Interchange - New (Add 1' and R Lots)
Roadway Widening or 110V Lanes
I I J
5
I 41 4 4
\
,
/ \
O
•
Corridor Improvement Projects
Beyond Year 2020
•"?.
6 Travel Lanes
b
z
ht.
pf,„4,
et
VC
Grrrnbv;t Rd
0Ack R
ankin
-*In Pd Uclav
pmtvR.
^M 44
1
w.
Orchard to Broadway
i44e giRd
HOV/Transit Lanes
(pluntn ltd
FlJbbz11Rd
Interchange — Reconstruct (Add P and R Lots)
Interchange - New (Add P and R Lots)
Roadway Widening or HOV Lanes
1
Broadway to Gowen
6 Travel Lanes
6
Corridor Improvement Projects
Total Projects to Year 2020
�6
S
S
..0 711nF
K Ir ¢ K
G F"
'stick Rd.
nn DA
1 *e Na#d Rd
Interchange — Reconstruct (Add P and R Lots)
O Interchange - New (Add P and R Lots)
Roadway Widening or HOV Lanes
New Overpass
7
What Does This All Cost?
$585 million total
• Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) $146 million (25%)
• Pavement reconstruction $ 41 million ( 7%)
• Interchan¢e reconstruction $ 154 million (26%)
TDM and Reconstruction $ 341 million (58 %)
• Mainline widening
• New Interchanges
New Construction
$ 158 million (27%)
$ 86 million (15%)
$ 244 million (42%)
6
I-84 Corridor
Funding Needs and
Projected Sources
Revised Draft
August 21, 2001
Needed:
$585 m
7
Unfunded:
$280 m
Projected
available:
$305 m
514 m (FTA, used primarily for
transit capital projects)
-- S5 m (FTA discretionary funds earmarked
Itby Congress for specific transit projects)
560 m (FHWA discretionary funds
earmarked by Congress for specific
highway projects)
-- 5115 m (FHWA grant formula funds)
— $7 m (vanpool operations return)
- — S10 m (FHWA - transit ITS share
with ACHD)
S20 m (local transit operations support
from property tax allocation)
'- S10 m (FAA support of Vista mterchangeL
— S9 m (state -funded, i.e., no federal
match - state pays for entire project)
- 535 m (STIP programmed')
--- 520 m (anticipated")
* S35 m is already programmed for interchange improvements
* * 520 in will be funded through anticipated pnvate funding,
but no specific source has been secured
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subiect: RZ-02-01 — Rezone from A -R to R-1 — RCMPG Investments
August 28, 2001
7:30 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of
Document2
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subject:VAC-1-01 Vacation to the final nlat of Baker's Acres Subdivision —
RCMPG Investments
7:30 P.M.
NAME
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of
Document2
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Subject: PP -3-01 — Cedro Glen Subdivision — RCMPG Investments
7:30 P.M.
NAME
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
ADDRESS TELEPHONE PRO? CON?
Page 1 of
Document2