Minutes - 2012 - City Council - 06/12/2012 - Regular EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
Minutes
June 12, 2012
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA: 5:30 p.m.-6:30 p.m.
1. Library Director: Introduction of new Library Director, Steve Bumgarner(SB)
Steve introduces himself. This is a beautiful town and a great Library and great Staff. I'm very
happy to be here and I will answer any questions that you have. General discussion.
2. Communities in Motion 2040 Presentation(NBS)
Planner Baird-Spencer provides Council an overview of Communities in Motion 2040 Presentation.
Displays overheads and discusses the same. General discussion.
Danny Granger presents Troop#26.
INVOCATION:
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA: 6:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Reynolds calls the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: SEMANKO, GRASSER,DEFAYETTE,BUTLER. All present. A quorum is
present.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Reynolds leads the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT: Scott Moriyuki,Northside Management, 3106 Ridgeway Drive,Boise,
this is a little unorthodox; recently we have been optioning several defunct projects around the valley.
We are finding that several of these properties have expired as far as their entitlements. We have an
opportunity to move forward with the project and complete the development and start housing this
year but the due diligence runs out on Friday. I am requesting reinstatement of the entitlements as
they were. I have the last extension of entitlement that you granted and I also have a development
schedule attached. General discussion.
City Attorney Buxton: Idaho Law requires us to have things identified on the agenda for an action
item. The City Council does not have ability to waive its Ordinances or State Law with regard to
these types of entitlements. My advice to you would get to the Staff and we have to have an
application for the Council to review. The application would have to go to Planning&Zoning and
then on to the City Council. This is the best we can do under these circumstances.
Further general discussion.
5. CONSENT AGENDA:
♦ Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one motion.
There will be no separate discussion on these items unless the Mayor, a Councilmember,
member of City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent
Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent Agenda will be placed on the
Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the City Council.
• Any item on the Consent Agenda which contains written Conditions of Approval from the
City of Eagle City Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission, or Design Review Board shall
Page 1
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-12-12min.doc
be adopted as part of the City Council's Consent Agenda approval motion unless
specifically stated otherwise.
A. Claims Against the City.
B. Minutes of May 17,2012
C. Re-appointment to the Historic Preservation Commission: Mayor Reynolds is
requesting the re-appointment of Pamela Kelch to the Commission. Ms. Kelch will
be serving a three(3)year term. (JDR).
D. DR-21-12 -Building Addition to the Wild West Restaurant-Naomi Preston:
Naomi Preston, represented by Brett Labrie with BGL Architecture, is requesting
design review approval to construct a 110-square foot building addition to the Wild
West restaurant for an outdoor cooking area. The 0.12-acre site is located on the
south side of East State Street approximately 150-feet east of Eagle Road at 83 East
State Street. (WEV)
Defayette removes Item#5A from the Consent Agenda.
Semanko moves to approve the Amended Consent Agenda, Items#B, C and D. Discussion. Semanko
withdraws the motion.
Semanko moves to approve the Amended Consent Agenda,Items#B and C. Seconded by
Defayette. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES
Semanko moves to continue Item#D to the next meeting. Second Grasser. ALL AYES:
MOTION CARRIES
A. Claims Against the City.
Defayette: I was wondering about the expenditure of soil aid for the Senior Center. Public Works
Director states that the City owns the Property and the Senior Center leases the building from the City
and the City maintains the landscaping. Also, what is the $7,900 for Wallace Brothers at the Sports
Complex? Public Works Director states that expenditure is for the rocks in the parking lot at the
Sports Complex.
Defayette approves Item#5A. Seconded by Butler. Semanko: AYE: Grasser: AYE; Defayette:
AYE; Butler: AYE;ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES
6. PROCLAMATIONS & RESOLUTIONS:
A. Resolution 12-17: Resolution Of The City Of Eagle,Ada County Idaho Supplementing The
Eagle Architecture And Sign Design Book With Additional Photos For Portable On-Premises
Advertising Signs and Portable Off-Premises Directional Signs; Providing A Severability Clause;And
Providing An Effective Date.(WEV) This item was continued from the May 22, 2012 meeting.
Mayor Reynolds introduces the issue.
Zoning Administrator Vaughan provides an overview of the changes. General discussion.
Grasser moves to approve Resolution 12-17. Seconded by Semanko. ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. Communities in Motion 2040 Discussion: (NBS) This item was continued from the May 22,
2012 meeting.
Mayor Reynolds introduces the issue.
Page 2
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-12-12min.doc
Planner Baird Spencer: Council the request for you is to approve the letter to be sent by signature of
the Mayor. The items that were discussed at the previous work session were to include a discussion
of the unmet goals and policies of each of scenarios and I believe Councilman Butler has something
that he wanted to add.
General discussion.
Butler moves that we send a recommendation to COMPASS with the recommendations that
were provided by the Planning and Zoning Commission,Items 1 through 8 with the following
additional position: The City strenuously objects to the use of Public funds for this COMPASS
effort as it attempts to usurp jurisdictional comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to the Local
Land Use Planning Act. Discussion. Butler amends his Motion: I would add an Item 10 that
the City feels this is such a serious unapproved use of tax payers funds that the City will be
considering the request from COMPASS for FY 12/13 Dues. Seconded by Semanko.
Discussion. Butler amends his Motion to add: The discussion of the goals and the inability of
the scenarios to meet the goals established. This will go before what I have previously added.
Second concurs. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. A-01-12 &RZ-01-12—Annexation and Rezone From RUT(Rural—Urban Transition—Ada
County designation)to A-R-DA(Agricultural-Residential with a Development Agreement)-
Summer Lawns: Summer Lawns, represented by Shawn Nickel with SLN Planning, is requesting
approval of an annexation and rezone from RUT(Rural-Urban Transition—Ada County designation)
to A-R-DA(Agricultural-Residential up to one(1)unit per five(5)acres with a development
agreement). The five(5)acre site is located on the west side of North Horseshoe Bend Road
approximately 475-feet south of the intersection of North Horseshoe Bend Road and East Floating
Feather Road at 11075 North Horseshoe Bend Road. (WEV)
Mayor Reynolds introduces the issue.
City Attorney Buxton: A couple of items on conflicts of interest. Summer Lawns has a contract with
the City to do landscaping. The City went through a public bid process to approve that contract.
Because this is a land use application there is no conflict of interest for the Council to hear this land
use application unless any of the Council has had any ex parte contact with regard to this application
or have any other conflicts of interest or bias that you would like to declare.
Semanko: Summer Lawns does the landscape maintenance in my Subdivision but I do not have a
financial interest in that and it does not bias my decision one way or the other.
City Attorney: I see no conflict.
Shawn Nickel,representing the applicant,displays an overhead and provides Council an overview of
the request for approval of an annexation and rezone. Planning and Zoning Commission did
recommend approval. We also have a request for waiver of the fees which is not currently on the
agenda. General discussion.
Mayor opens the Public Hearing
General Discussion
Planner Williams provides Council an overview of the request for approval of an annexation and
rezone. General discussion.
Mayor closes the Public Hearing
Butler moves to approve the application A-01-12 & RZ-01-12 with the conditions recommended by
Page 3
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-12-12min.doc
the Planning and Zoning Commission,amending 3.2 to say: the horticulture and nursery
operations and accessory landscaping business are the only approved uses for the site. Any
change of use will require a modification to this agreement.
Mayor and City Attorney discuss the Public Hearing Process.
Mayor closes the Public Hearing.
Butler: I move as I stated a few minutes ago. Seconded by Defayette. City Attorney: I would
request because this is a land use application and with the motion pending I would request
whether is any comment by Council Members prior to the vote. ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES
General discuss on the request to waive the fees. This item will be added to the next City Council
Agenda.
City Attorney Buxton discusses the usual order for a public hearing.
B. RZ-13-05 MOD 3—Development Agreement Modification—Cloud Berry,LLC: Cloud Berry,
LLC,represented by Justin Martin, is requesting a modification to the development agreement
(Instrument#106161990)associated with the R-2-DA-P(Residential-up to two units per acre with a
development agreement-Planned Unit Development)zoning classification for the Legacy
Development. The 623.9-acre site is generally located approximately 1,850-feet north of State
Highway 44 between Linder Road and State Highway 16.
Mayor Reynolds introduces the issue.
Brian McCall, I am the Manager for Cloud Berry,LLC,we are in agreement with the Staff Report.
Provides a history of the development previously known as Legacy. General discussion.
Planner Williams provides Council an overview of the project and Development Agreement Modification.
General discussion.
Mayor opens the Public Hearing
Dave Yorgason, 14254 W. Battenberg Drive,Boise, I'm not here to support or oppose. We the landowners
and closely integrated with the Legacy Development when it first began. We were the developers of the
Laynewood Estates Development. We were part of the development until there were some changes. I want
to address 3 points tonight: future academies, school site and sewer. Future Academies, if the City decides
to take out the Academies I can understand that because the market has changed and I don't think the
market would support this today. I do think the density should change. School site, if the School District
has said in writing that a school is not necessary that is fine but if the School District has not responded I
think you should get something in writing. Sewer, I do think it would be important for the Developer to
cooperate with their neighbors. General discussion.
Discussion on leaving the public hearing open.
Brian McCall: Provides rebuttal responses to the Public Testimony. General discussion.
General Council discussion.
Semanko moves that oral comment period of the Public Hearing be closed and the written comment
period stay open until the June 26,2012 Council meeting. Seconded by Butler. ALL AYES:
MOTION CARRIES
9. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Discussion regarding City possibly taking over Eagle Road and old State Street intersection
landscaping installed by Naomi Preston with a Urban Renewal Agency(URA) grant. (MLB)
Page 4
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-12-12min.doc
Mayor Reynolds introduces the issue.
General discussion
Public Works Director: I have looked at this and discussed the maintenance cost with Summer Lawns
and we have come to the conclusion that there will be no cost to the City. Summer Lawns will give
the City one year free.
General discussion.
Butler moves to remand this back to the URA as the Urban Renewal Agency should take care of
this. Discussion. Seconded by Semanko. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES
B. Discussion of leash laws: (MD)
Mayor Reynolds introduces the issue.
General discussion on the City Code in regard to dog leash laws.
10. REPORTS:
a) Mayor and Council Reports and Concerns:
Mayor reports on the BVEP meeting. The Chairman would like to make a presentation to the Council
in the future at Pre-Council.
On Thursday morning their will be a fund raising breakfast to generate some money for a marketing
web site for the City. We have 35 responses thus far.
Eagle Project will meet this Thursday afternoon from 3 to 5.
Butler: We got our first 25' high, 200 sq.ft. sign out there if you want to take a look at it. It is at
Fred Meyer on Chinden. Fred Meyer opens on the 22nd.
Semanko: We did receive the response from Garden City today in regards to the Greenbelt. It is a
little disappointing. All we asked for is a dialog and they said they have no interest in discussing the
matter with us. General discussion.
b) City Clerk/Treasurer Report: No report
c) Zoning Administrator's Report: Reports on the Joint Meeting with ACHD meeting. ACHD will
be installing shared lanes between Cobblestone and Stierman. Discusses the extension of time
application and how Council would like to handle this. General discussion.
General discussion on the Joint Meeting with ACHD.
General discussion on signs being out of compliance at the Gathering Place.
d) Public Works Director Report: All the parking lots in the City are finished. The landscaping bark
is also done. We are going to start moving down toward the river to work in that area. You may see
a young man named Josh around the Parks. We are going to have him for about 7 weeks. This is part
of the Work Force Investment Act through the Department of Labor. The State pays his wages and
work comp so this is free labor for the City. This provides him a job recommendation.
e) City Attorney Report: Reports on the M3 meetings. M3 has acquired the interest in the
Foxtail/Wilson property. Not the entire property,there were two parcels. We should see applications
coming in. M3 will be coming in with the Spring Valley CID.
Page 5
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-12-12min.doc
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
A. I.C. 67-2345 (c)—Acquisition of Private Property
Idaho Code § 67-2345. Executive sessions--When authorized. (1)An executive session at which
members of the public are excluded may be held,but only for the purposes and only in the manner set
forth in this section. The motion to go into executive session shall identify the specific subsections of
this section that authorize the executive session. There shall be a roll call vote on the motion and the
vote shall be recorded in the minutes. An executive session shall be authorized by a two-thirds(2/3)
vote of the governing body. An executive session may be held:
c) To conduct deliberations concerning labor negotiations or to acquire an interest in real property
which is not owned by a public agency;
Defayette moves to go into Executive Session in accordance with I.C. zZ67-2345(c) to consider
Acquisition of Private Property. Seconded by Semanko. Semanko: AYE; Grasser: AYE;
Defayette: AYE; Butler: AYE: ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES
Council goes into Executive Session at 8:30 p.m.
Council discusses acquisition of private property.
Council leaves Executive Session at 9:55 p.m.
12. ADJOURNMENT:
Defayette moves to adjourn. Seconded by Semanko. ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES
Hearing no further business, the Council meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
o` ty`j p-, 'r
SHARON K. BERGMANN • 40 ••
CITY CLERK/TREASURER = : u° � ��
*PROVED: •• •ORPO�•••
,,' `rPA TE "`'
I,.41stuacssssss°*
ES D. REYNOL I S
MAYOR
AN AUDIO RECORDING OF THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL UPON
REQUEST.
Page 6
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-06-12-12min.doc
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP
RZ-13-05 MOD 3 — Development Agreement Modification — Cloud Berry, LLC
June 12, 2012
TESTIFY PRO/ CON or
NAME ADDRESS YES/NO NEUTRAL
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP
A-01-12 & RZ-01-12 — Annexation and Rezone From RUT (Rural — Urban Transition —
Ada County desienation) to A -R -DA (Aericultural-Residential with a Develop ment
Aereement) - Summer Lawns
June 12, 2012
NAME
/l.1 r c./ce
TESTIFY PRO/ CON or
ADDRESS YES/NO NEUTRAL
/ �� 9 N_ �s���c�n .
9,361 l S A0
Tracy Osborn
From: Barb Cerda
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:46 AM
To: City Council
Cc: Tracy Osborn; Sharon Bergmann, Sheri Horton; Bill (Work) Vaughan; Mike Williams; Nichoel
Baird -Spencer
Subject: FW. Meeting Change request
;i•\0i till(! L �nlncil \linll �r
The applicant for item 51). on your June l2'i' City Council meeting. is requesting their application be continued to the .lune
26ih meeting ( see email below). -
el nle Lno\\ it \uu ha\e:ul\ glieN1 ii',. 1 hank \Oil.
Barb Cerda
PI;uincr it
Lim 1
bcerda(�citvofeagle.org
The Eagle City Hall office is open Monday - Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
IA Before printing this e-mail think if it is necessary. Think Green!
From: Naomi Preston fmailto:mustangladv80@gmail.coml
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:27 AM
To: Barb Cerda
Subject: Meeting Change request
Ili Barb.
This is to request moving our project from the City Council meeting of June 12 to June 26
Thank you very much,
Naomi Preston
Wild West Bakery & Espresso
1
Brian I Coll
From: Ronni Christianson
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 11:55 AM
To: 'Susan E. Buxton'
Cc: Brian McCoII
Subject: FW: Affidavit of Legal Interest
Attachments: Memorandum of Agreement (Legacy).pdf
Susan,
Below is the email from Mr. Robbins that Brian asked !forward to you for review. Also attached for your reference is a
copy of the Memorandum of Agreement.
Thanks,
Ronni
From: Conor Robbins [mailto:conor.robbins@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:33 AM
To: Brian McColl
Subject: Re: Affidavit of Legal Interest
Brian,
Here are some comments from the investor I mentioned. Give me your thoughts.
1) Page 3 of the Development Agreement Second Modification references the shift of the Townhouse
entitlements from "the Applicant's Property" to the Expansion Parcel #1. I was of the understanding
that the commercial entitlements were also going to be allocated to the Expansion Parcel #1.
2) Page 4 reiterates the Expansion Parcel #1 remaining subject to the Development Agreement as
amended. Are there any fees or other costs we need adjusting? If I remember correctly, the water
hookup / sewer tap fees were onerous. I believe the tap fees for Legacy proper were waived for them as
they put in the water well. Can we tie into that also as I believe they are using the pig farm water rights?
3) Section 3.4.4 open space dictates a 20% allowance. A significant portion of our requirement was to be
met with the open space required by the academies, which is now going away. It seems like the
Applicant is benefitting from being able to build on what was to be open space and we no longer have
that as an offset against our requirement.
4) Section 3.4.4.3.4 refers to the 20 foot paths with 10 feet paved. We should confirm that we can still do
this in the existing road easements and not loose considerable amounts of real estate.
5) If I remember correctly, there was to be a payment made on a lot basis by the pig farm owners to the
Legacy Project owners for the costs and infrastructure associated with the academies. If the academies
are to be removed as a Development Agreement requirement, we need to make sure there are no
remaining costs associated that could cost us in the future.
On May 29, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Brian McColl wrote:
1
Exhb1j B EcC 41:2
Thanks for taking the time on this matter.
Brian
(PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS)
LEGAL ASSISTANT TO:
Brian F. McColl
Wilson & McColl
3858 N. Garden Center Way, Suite 200
Boise, Idaho 83703
P.O. Box, 1544, Boise, ID 83701-1544
Telephone: (208) 345-9100
Facsimile: (208) 384-0442
Email: Ronni anwilsonmccoll.com
** Confidentiality Notice**
This e-mail and the documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is
legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents
of this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-
mail at the address above. The transmission is to be deleted and any items that may have been printed are to be destroyed. Thank
you for your compliance.
2
Thanks Conor.
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS:
Brian F. McColl
Wilson & McColl
3858 N. Garden Center Way, Suite 200
Boise, Idaho 83703
P.O. Box 1544
Boise, Idaho 83701-1544
Telephone: (208) 345-9100
Facsimile: (208) 384-0442
Email: Briant wilsonmccoll.com
** Confidentiality Notice**
This e-mail and the documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is
legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of
this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-
mail at the address above. The transmission is to be deleted and any items that may have been printed are to be destroyed. Thank you
for your compliance.
From: Conor Robbins[mailto:conor.robbinsOamail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 5:31 PM
To: Brian McCoII
Subject: Re: Affidavit of Legal Interest
All but one of them. I'm sure everything is fine in the affidavit (I read it and the DA mod and it looks good to
me), but he's in Asia and slow to respond. I'll get back to you asap.
Conor
On May 25, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Brian McColl wrote:
Conner -anything back from your investors yet?
Brian
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS:
Brian F. McCoII
Wilson & McCoII
3858 N. Garden Center Way, Suite 200
Boise, Idaho 83703
P.O. Box 1544
Boise, Idaho 83701-1544
Telephone: (208) 345-9100
Facsimile: (208) 384-0442
Email: Brian(ci3wilsonmccoll.com
** Confidentiality Notice**
2
•
This e-mail and the documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is
legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of
this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-
mail at the address above. The transmission is to be deleted and any items that may have been printed are to be destroyed. Thank you
for your compliance.
From: Ronni Christianson
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 4:35 PM
To: 'Conor Robbins'
Cc: Brian McColl
Subject: Affidavit of Legal Interest
Conor,
Here is the document - Affidavit of Legal Interest - I mentioned Brian was drafting for your review, and signature if you
approve. Please call Brian if you have any questions. Otherwise, if you could sign in front of a notary and return the
original to our office, that would be appreciated.
Thank you for your assistance in this regard.
Ronni
(PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS)
LEGAL ASSISTANT TO:
Brian F. McColl
Wilson & McColl
3858 N. Garden Center Way, Suite 200
Boise, Idaho 83703
P.O. Box, 1544, Boise, ID 83701-1544
Telephone: (208) 345-9100
Facsimile: (208) 384-0442
Email: Ronni(d wilsonmccoll.com
** Confidentiality Notice**
This e-mail and the documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is
legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents
of this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-
mail at the address above. The transmission is to be deleted and any items that may have been printed are to be destroyed. Thank
you for your compliance.
3
Ronni Christianson t
From: Conor Robbins [conor.robbins@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:21 AM
To: Brian McColl
Subject: Re: Legacy
We would like to accept your proposal. Would you please send us the legal documentation for signature and
we'll get it back to you asap. Also, pease let us know if there is anything we can do to help the development
process with the city. I've contacted the original owners to see if we can get the original engineer to send you
their work. I'll let you know when 1 hear back. If you feel it would be helpful for us to be at your next city
meeting, please let us know. Thanks,
Conor
On Mar 14. 2012, at 6:02 PM, Brian McColl wrote:
Conor: Anything yet?
Brian
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS:
Brian F. McColl
Wilson & McColl
3858 N. Garden Center Way, Suite 200
Boise, Idaho 83703
P.O. Box 1544
Boise, Idaho 83701-1544
Telephone: (208) 345-9100
Facsimile: (208) 384-0442
Email: Brian(c�wilsonmccoll.com
** Confidentiality Notice**
This e-mail and the documents accompany ing this transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is
legally privileged The information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities named above, If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of
this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. if you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-
mail at the address above. The transmission is to be deleted and any items that may have been printed are to be destroyed. Thank you
for your compliance.
From: Conor Robbins [mailto:conor.robbins@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 9:53 AM
To: Ronni Christianson
Cc: Brian McColl
Subject: Re: Legacy
Brian,
f'r-A\--1- A
Just xvanted to let you know that I'm still waiting for last investor to weigh in on your proposal. 1 should have a
response early next week. Thanks,
Conor
On Feb 29. 2012. at 4:13 PM. Ronni Christianson wrote:
Conor,
I have reviewed with my principals the possibility of compensating your investors in return for their support of our
Development Agreement Modification. At the outset, we firmly believe that the Expansion Parcel stands to only benefit
if we are successful with the city. If unsuccessful, the Expansion Parcel is undevelopable unless it starts from scratch. In
that event under the existing PUD Ordinance this density would be reduced from 2.2 to 2 dwelling units per acre, and
commercial use would be reduced to 10% of the site - 7.81 acres. If the Expansion Parcel is developed outside of
Legacy's PUD, each use would be subject to a supply trunk line fee, which I believe is in the neighborhood of $2,100 per
residential unit, more for commercial. Conversely, if our Development Agreement Modification is granted, the
Expansion Parcel would be entitled to file plat applications, construct and obtain building permits. I think we both
recognize that under the current market conditions and prior to the Highway 16 project, no one is in a rush to
commence further development. On the other hand, we believe there is no better time to clear the path of the amenity
restrictions. I think I can represent to you that the City agrees. They are pro -development and want our project — and
presumably your project — to go forward. With this background, we all see your investors' request for a quid pro quo for
what it is, and it is probably not helpful to express my clients' opinions on this.
That said, I am authorized to make the following proposal:
Our Development Agreement Modification would contain the following provision:
"No further townhouses shall be developed on the Original Property, it being understood that any townhouse acreage
that otherwise would have been available for development on the Original Property may be utilized in the future
development of Expansion Parcel No. 1."
The original Development Agreement capped multi -family at 20% of the aggregate dwelling units. In our proposed
modified conditions we were reducing multi -family to 11%. Our offer to you essentially reduces that figure on the
balance of our property to zero. If the Expansion Parcel kept its 12.9 acres of commercial (more than currently allowed
under the existing PUD Ordinance) and kept its 2.2/DUA (also a density bonus not in the current PUD), the project could
have 144 dwelling units. I have run the numbers and based on the 43 townhouse lots our project has already platted,
and assuming the so called "Haynes Parcel" utilized its 2.2/DUA for all multi -family, under the 20% cap — see Section
3.4.1.3 of the Development Agreement — theoretically, the overall project would have available an additional 177
townhouses. With the Expansion Parcel being entitled to a 144 units on its non-commercial portion, arguably with the
concession made in this proposal, all of the residential portion could be multi -family.
I am on an out-of-pocket trip getting back March 13 . I will have some cell phone coverage (208-484-8587) or you can
email my assistant Ronni at ronni(a)wilsonmccoll.com. This proposal may require some additional concept plan revisions
and so I am asking the city to remand the hearing currently set March 27, and when we get it re -noticed I will let you
know.
It has been a struggle to get my folks to offer this, and I am certain that additional concession requests will be dead on
arrival. My read of the city is that they are not sympathetic to the motivation of your investors' objections. If we can't
resolve the matter along these lines, we are very comfortable going forward with our modification request without
Legacy Expansion Parcel, LLC's approval.
Thanks for taking the time on this matter.
Brian
LEGAL ASSISTANT TO:
(PLEASE ,NOTE OUR :VE ff'.-ADDRESS)
2
4.
' Brian F. McColl
Wilson & McColl
3858 N. Garden Center Way, Suite 200
Boise, Idaho 83703
P.O. Box, 1544, Boise, ID 83701-1544
Telephone: (208) 345-9100
Facsimile: (208) 384-0442
Email: Ronni dwilsonmccoll.com
** Confidentiality Notice**
This e-mail and the documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is
legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents
of this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-
mail at the address above. The transmission is to be deleted and any items that may have been printed are to be destroyed. Thank
you for your compliance.
3
Ronni Christianson
From: Ronni Christianson
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 4:14 PM
To: 'conor. robbins@gmail.com'
Cc: Brian McColl
Subject: Legacy
Conor,
I have reviewed with my principals the possibility of compensating your investors in return for their support of our
Development Agreement Modification. At the outset, we firmly believe that the Expansion Parcel stands to only benefit
if we are successful with the city. If unsuccessful, the Expansion Parcel is undevelopable unless it starts from scratch. In
that event under the existing PUD Ordinance this density would be reduced from 2.2 to 2 dwelling units per acre, and
commercial use would be reduced to 10% of the site - 7.81 acres. If the Expansion Parcel is developed outside of
Legacy's PUD, each use would be subject to a supply trunk line fee, which I believe is in the neighborhood of $2,100 per
residential unit, more for commercial. Conversely, if our Development Agreement Modification is granted, the
Expansion Parcel would be entitled to file plat applications, construct and obtain building permits. I think we both
recognize that under the current market conditions and prior to the Highway 16 project, no one is in a rush to
commence further development. On the other hand, we believe there is no better time to clear the path of the amenity
restrictions. I think I can represent to you that the City agrees. They are pro -development and want our project — and
presumably your project — to go forward. With this background, we all see your investors' request for a quid pro quo for
what it is, and it is probably not helpful to express my clients' opinions on this.
That said, I am authorized to make the following proposal:
Our Development Agreement Modification would contain the following provision:
"No further townhouses shall be developed on the Original Property, it being understood that any townhouse acreage
that otherwise would have been available for development on the Original Property may be utilized in the future
development of Expansion Parcel No. 1."
The original Development Agreement capped multi -family at 20% of the aggregate dwelling units. In our proposed
modified conditions we were reducing multi -family to 11%. Our offer to you essentially reduces that figure on the
balance of our property to zero. If the Expansion Parcel kept its 12.9 acres of commercial (more than currently allowed
under the existing PUD Ordinance) and kept its 2.2/DUA (also a density bonus not in the current PUD), the project could
have 144 dwelling units. I have run the numbers and based on the 43 townhouse lots our project has already platted,
and assuming the so called "Haynes Parcel" utilized its 2.2/DUA for all multi -family, under the 20% cap — see Section
3.4.1.3 of the Development Agreement — theoretically, the overall project would have available an additional 177
townhouses. With the Expansion Parcel being entitled to a 144 units on its non-commercial portion, arguably with the
concession made in this proposal, all of the residential portion could be multi -family.
I am on an out-of-pocket trip getting back March 13 . I will have some cell phone coverage (208-484-8587) or you can
email my assistant Ronni at ronniPwilsonmccoll.com. This proposal may require some additional concept plan revisions
and so I am asking the city to remand the hearing currently set March 27, and when we get it re -noticed I will let you
know.
It has been a struggle to get my folks to offer this, and I am certain that additional concession requests will be dead on
arrival. My read of the city is that they are not sympathetic to the motivation of your investors' objections. If we can't
resolve the matter along these lines, we are very comfortable going forward with our modification request without
Legacy Expansion Parcel, LLC's approval.
1
City of Eagle
Date Check No
Payee
06/01/2012 7416 Ada County Sheriffs Office
06/01/2012 7417 Bankcard Center - Zions
Total 7417
06/01/2012 7418 CenturyLink -29040
Total 7418
06/01/2012 7419 Delta Dental of Idaho
Total 7419
06/01/2012 7420 Eagle Mini Storage
06/01/2012 7421 Idaho Child Support Receipting
06/01/2012 7422 Intermountain Gas Company
Total 7422
06/01/2012 7423 NCPERS IDAHO
Total 7423
06/01/2012 7424 Pacific Source Health Plans
Total 7424
06/01/2012 7425 U.S. Bancorp Equipment Finance
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
Check Register - Transparency Version
Check Issue Date(s): 05/22/2012 - 06/11/2012
Seq GL Acct No GL Acct Title
1 80-0217-08-00 GARNISHMENTS
1 13-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
2 01-0413-37-00 BACKGROUND CHECK-PERMITS/UC
1 01-0465-03-00 CAPITAL EXPEND/CITY HALL EQUIP
2 11-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
3 11-0422-01-00 PUBLIC RELATIONS
1 01-0413-19-00 TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
1 07-0462-52-00 MUSEUM UTILITIES
1 12-0217-07-00 CLERK DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
2 07-0217-07-00 MUSEUM HEALTH INSURANCE
3 11-0217-07-00 EXEC DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
4 14-0217-07-00 P&Z DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
5 15-0217-07-00 PUBUC WORKS HEALTH INSURANCE
6 13-0217-07-00 BLDG DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
7 60-0217-07-00 WATER DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
8 06-0217-07-00 LIBRARY HEALTH INSURANCE
1
1
1
1
07-0462-15-00 STORAGE UNIT
60-0217-08-00 GARNISHMENTS
01-0413-16-00 UTILITIES/NEW CITY HALL
07-0482-52-00 MUSEUM UTILITIES
1 14-0217-07-00
2 06-0217-07-00
3 07-0217-07-00
4 15-0217-07-00
5 80-0217-07-00
6 13-0217-07-00
7 12-0217-07-00
8 11-0217-07-00
P&Z DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
LIBRARY HEALTH INSURANCE
MUSEUM HEALTH INSURANCE
PUBUC WORKS HEALTH INSURANCE
WATER DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
BLDG DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
CLERK DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
EXEC DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
1 13-0217-07-00 BLDG DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
2 12-0217-07-00 CLERK DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
3 14-0217-07-00 P&Z DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
4 07-0217-07-00 MUSEUM HEALTH INSURANCE
5 15-0217-07-00 PUBLIC WORKS HEALTH INSURANCE
6 60-0217-07-00 WATER DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
7 08-0217-07-00 LIBRARY HEALTH INSURANCE
1 01-0418-24-00 EQUIPMENT LEASING
1 12-0416-24-00 EQUIPMENT LEASING
2 13-0418-24-00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT LEASING
3 11-0416-24-00 EQUIPMENT LEASING
Page: 1
Jun 11, 2012 01:15pm
Seq Amount Check Amount
410.24 410.24
520.00
400.00
130.80
30.00
45.56 1,126.36
1,126.36
92.85
102.87 195.72
195.72
259.50
4155
83.05
308.05
68.44
281.35
134.01
454.85 1,608.80
1,608.80
83.00 83.00
125.00 125.00
195.75
16.10 211.85
211.85
64.00
128.00
16.00
28.80
51.20
48.00
48.00
18.00 400.00
400.00
2,289.10
3,025.08
4,411.16
451.50
812.70
2,153.85
5,381.88 18, 525.05
18,525.05
201.75
39.81
39.81
39.81
City of Eagle
Date Check No
Total 7425
Payee
06/01/2012 7428 United Heritage -Group Dept.
Total 7428
08/01/2012 7427 United Water Idaho
Total 7427
06/11/2012 7429
06/11/2012 7430
06/11/2012 7431
06/11/2012 7432
06/11/2012 7433
06/11/2012 7434
06/11/2012 7435
06/11/2012 7438
06/11/2012 7437
A Company, Inc.
ABC Stamp Co.
Acoustical Supply & Dist.
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Treasurer
AdGear
Alexander Clark Printing
Alloway Electric
Alsco
Total 7437
08/11/2012 7438 Analytical Laboratories. Inc.
Total 7438
06/11/2012 7439 AT & T Mobility
06/11/2012 7440 Baldwin & Associates, Inc.
Total 7440
06/11/2012
08/11/2012
08/11/2012
06/11/2012
7441 Barrow, Robert
7442 Bitting Document Specialists
7443 Boise Office Equipment
7444 Casette, Inc.
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
Check Register - Transparency Version
Check Issue Date(s): 05/22/2012 - 08/11/2012
Seq GL Acct No
GL Acct Title
4 14-0416-24-00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT LEASING
5 14-0416-24-00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT LEASING
6 13-0416-24-00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT LEASING
1 07-0217-07-00 MUSEUM HEALTH INSURANCE
2 12-0217-07-00 CLERK DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
3 06-0217-07-00 LIBRARY HEALTH INSURANCE
4 13-0217-07-00 BLDG DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
5 14-0217-07-00 P&Z DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
6 15-0217-07-00 PUBLIC WORKS HEALTH INSURANCE
7 60-0217-07-00 WATER DEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
1 60-0434-52-01 WATER/FIRE FLOW
1
60-0434-52-01 WATER/FIRE FLOW
1 15-0448-06-00
1 01-0413-05-00
1 15-0443-01-00
1 01-0203-00-00
1 01-0416-22-00
1 01-0422-06-00
1 13-0413-05-00
1 15-0442-01-00
1 15-0444-03-00
1 15-0442-03-00
1 15-0444-03-00
1 15-0442-03-00
UTILITIES
OFFICE EXPENSES
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
ACCTS PAYABLE-ACHD IMPACT FEES
CITY HALL OPERATING EXPENSES
FIELD OF HONOR
OFFICE EXPENSES
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
1 60-0435-56-00 TESTING -WKLY, MO, QTR, ANNUAL
1 60-0435-56-00 TESTING -WKLY, MO. OTR, ANNUAL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
60-0434-19-00 TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
01-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
14-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
01-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
01-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
01-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
12-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
60-0434-15-00 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1 60-0220-00-00 WATER/SERVICE DEPOSITS
1 60-0434-47-00 BILLING SERVICES
1 01-0413-23-00 MTNC-REPAIR/OFFICE EQUIP/FURN
1 60-0434-55-00 CASELLE SUPPORT
2 01-0413-23-00 MTNC-REPAIR/OFFICE EQUIP/FURN
Page: 2
Jun 11,2012 01:15pm
Seq Amount Check Amount
39.81
39.78
39.81 440.58
440.58
1.80
5.78
15.90
8.40
9.20
1.80
8.20 49.08
49.08
219.98
513.18 733.14
733.14
127.50 127.50
18.55 18.55
8.58 8.58
98,358.00 98,358.00
7,994.53 7,984.53
252.44 252.44
1,580.95 1,560.95
300.00 300.00
28.29
55.01
28.56
55.60 167.46
167.46
60.00
15.00 75.00
75.00
80.81 60.81
26.98
50.13
5.79
6.99
39.90
25.98
69.99 225.76
225.76
24.52 24.52
822.05 822.05
95.00 95.00
150.00
501.00 651.00
City of Eagie
Date Check No
Total 7444
Payee
06/11/2012 7445 Charles H Brown Jr.
08/11/2012 7446 Chevron
Total 7446
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
08/11/2012
Total 7449
7447 Clearwire
7448 Computer Arts Inc
7449 Curtis Clean Sweep, Inc.
08/11/2012 7450
08/11/2012 7451
06/11/2012 7452
08111/2012 7453
06/11/2012 7454
06/11/2012 7455
06/11/2012 7456
06/11/2012 7457
06/11/2012 7458
Total 7458
D&B Supply
David Aizpitarte
Dennis Holte
Derek T Smith
DigLine
Drugfree Idaho
Eagle Mini Storage
Eagle Senior Citizens. Inc.
Eagle Sewer District
06/11/2012 7459 Eagle Water CO
Total 7459
06/11/2012 7460 Elizabeth Conrad McRoberts
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
Check Register - Transparency Version
Check Issue Date(s): 05/22/2012 - 06/11/2012
Seq GL Acct No
1 09-0463-07-00
1 60-0420-01-00
2 13-0417-02-00
3 15-0413-20.00
4 15-0413-26-00
5 15-0413-26-00
6 60-0420.01-00
1 60-0434-19-00
1 01-0416-37-00
1 15-0450-01-00
1 15-0443-02-00
1 15-0454-01-00
1 15-0452-01-00
1 15-0449-01-00
1 15-0451-01-00
1 15-0440-01-00
1 15-0440-01-00
1 15-0437-25-00
1 01-0413-01-00
1 13-0418-09-00
1 01-0413-01-00
1 60-0434-44-00
1 08-0217-07-00
1 60-0434-44-00
1 01-0416-10-00
1 01-0413-16-00
1 15-0449-08-00
1 07-0462-52-00
1 15-0452-08-00
2 15-0450-06-00
1 15-0455-06-00
1 15-0452-08-00
1 15-0452-08-00
1 01-0413-16-00
1 15-0446-06-00
1 15-045546-00
1 15-0448-08-00
1 15-0450-06-00
1 07-0462-52-00
1 15-0453-06-00
1 15-0455-06-00
GL Acct Title
EAGLE FUN DAYS
FUEL & LUBRICANTS
FUEL COSTS
GAS AND OIL
GAS AND OIL
GAS AND OIL
FUEL & LUBRICANTS
TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
COMPUTER ARTS IT CONTRACT
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
MAINT & REPAIR GROUNDS
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
GREENBELT -PATHWAY REPAIR-MTNC
GREENBELT -PATHWAY REPAIR-MTNC
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
P&Z COMMISSIONERS COMPENSATION
PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
P&Z COMMISSIONERS COMPENSATION
CONTRACT SERVICES INSPECTIONS
UBRARY HEALTH INSURANCE
CONTRACT SERVICES INSPECTIONS
SR CENTER VAN AGREEMENT
UTILITIES/NEW CITY HALL
UTILITIES
MUSEUM UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES/NEW CITY HALL
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
MUSEUM UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTIUTIES
1 15-0413-27-00 REFUNDS -PARK RESERVATIONS
Page: 3
Jun 11, 2012 01:15pm
Seq Amount Check Amount
651.00
1,500.00 1,500.00
838.05
193.59
84.83
102.29
122.43
131.38 1,470.57
1.470.57
44.39 44.39
9,918.00 9,918.00
1,114.58
1,310.84
4,028.39
2,843.15
7,272.09
879.80
454.04
523.04 18,223.71
18,223.71
131.99 131.98
100.00 100.00
3,102.09 3.102.09
100.00 100.00
83.82 63.82
31.68 31.68
78.00 78.00
1,216.87 1,216.67
120.00
30.00
30.00
15.00
15.00 210.00
210.00
10.07
83.40
70.00
84.55
212.02
46.57
140.42
31.44
8.25
152.70
14.92 834.34
834.34
37.50 37.50
City of Eagle
Date Check No Payee
06/11/2012 7461 Gary W. Tanner
06/11/2012 7462 Gerhard Borbonus Landscaping
06/11/2012 7463 Hawkins -Smith Eagle Hail LLC
06/11/2012 7464 HD Supply Facilities Maint.
06/11/2012 7465 HD Suppy Waterworks, Inc.
Total 7485
06/11/2012 7468 Idaho Correctional Industries
Total 7466
06/11/2012 7467 Idaho Humane Society, Inc.
08/11/2012 7468 Idaho Power Co. -Processing Ctr
Total 7468
06/11/2012 7469
06/11/2012 7470
06/11/2012 7471
08/11/2012 7472
06/11/2012 7473
06/11/2012 7474
Total 7474
Idaho State Historical Society
Integra Telecom
International Code Council Inc
Jack Brown
James Reynolds
K&T Maintenance
06/11/2012 7475 Kelly -Moore Paints
06/11/2012 7476 Laurie Baker
Total 7476
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
Total 7479
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
7477 Les Schwab Tire Center
7478 McAdams, Joe
7479 Melissa Nodzu
7480 Methodworks
7481 Mimura & Associates
7482 Moore Smith Buxton & Turcke
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
Check Register - Transparency Version
Check Issue Date(s): 05/22/2012 - 06/11/2012
Seq GL Acct No
GL Acct Title
01-0413-01-00 P&Z COMMISSIONERS COMPENSATION
08-0472-01-00 DEVELOPMENT -SPORTS COMPLEX
01-0416-21-00 CITY HALL LEASE PAYMENT - H.S.
15-0437-25-00 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
60-0434-26-00 MISCELLANEOUS
60-0434-26-00 MISCELLANEOUS
1 01-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
1 14-0413-06-00 DUPLICATION/PUBLISHING/PRINTIG
01-0416-06-00 IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY
15-0454-08-00 UTILITIES
15-0441-06-00 STREET LIGHTS -UTILITIES
15-0452-06-00 UTILITIES
15-0441-06-00 STREET LIGHTS -UTILITIES
07-0461-02-00 ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP
01-0413-19-00 TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
13-0413-28-00 RESOURCE MATERIALS
09-0463-02-00 EAGLE SATURDAY MARKET
11-0413-24-00 Vehicle Expense
15-0444-03-00 CUSTODIAL SERVICES
15-0443-03-00 CUSTORIAL SERVICES
15-0442-03-00 CUSTODIAL SERVICES
1 15-0451-01-00 MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
1 07-0463-02-00 EXHIBIT ITEMS
2 07-0463-01-00 DISPLAY SUPPLIES
3 07-0462-33-00 PUBLICITY -PRINTING
4 07-0463.01-00 DISPLAY SUPPLIES
5 07-0462-33-00 PUBLICITY -PRINTING
60-0420-03-00 VEHICLE MTNC & REPAIR
60-0220-00-00 WATER/SERVICE DEPOSITS
09-0463-02-01 SAT MARKET MGR FEES
09-0463-02-01 SAT MARKET MGR FEES
1 60-0434-58-00 WATER REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
1 01-0416-05-00 PROSECUTOR
1 01-0416-02-00 CITY ATTORNEY
1 01-0416-02-00 CITY ATTORNEY
1 60-0434-42-01 WATER/LEGAL SERVICES
1 01-0416-02-00 CITY ATTORNEY
2 01-0413-33-00 ATTORNEY FEE -CHARGE DEVELOPERS
1 60-0434-42-01 WATER/LEGAL SERVICES
Page: 4
Jun 11, 2012 01:15pm
Seq Amount Check Amount
100.00 100.00
500.00 500.00
11,867.07 11,887.07
132.05 132.05
120.89
192.00 312.89
312.89
239.75
35.00 274.75
274.75
3.522.00 3,522.00
5.89
28.18
305.91
4.29 344.27
344.27
25.00 25.00
312.11 312.11
218.75 218.75
150.00 150.00
95.52 95.52
2,930.00
954.74
900.00 4,784.74
4,784.74
53.42 53.42
7.94
21.16
9.11
9.52
47.70 95.43
95.43
592.08 592.08
34.12 34.12
377.00
598.00 975.00
975.00
380.00 380.00
3,750.00 3,750.00
3,780.37
178.88
476.87
1,606.10
76.00
3,465.29
City of Eagle Check Register - Transparency Version Page: 5
Jun 11. 2012 01:15pm
Date Check No
Total 7482
Payee
06/11/2012 7483 National Benefit Services, LLC
Total 7483
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
7484 Nichoel Baird Spencer
7485 Peak Alarm Company
7486 Petty Cash -City Hap
Total 7486
06/11/2012 7487 Petty Cash -Historic Commission
Total 7487
06/11/2012 7488 Preservation Idaho
06/11/2012 7489 Recreation Today of Idaho, LLC
08/11/2012 7490 Shred -it - USA -Boise
08/11/2012 7491 Staptes Credit Plan
Total 7491
08/11/2012 7492 Summer Lawns, Inc.
M = Manual Check. V = Vo:d Check
Check Issue Date(s): 05/22/2012 - 08111/2012
Seq GL Acct No
GL Acct Title
2 01.0413-33-00 ATTORNEY FEE -CHARGE DEVELOPERS
1 01-0416-02-00 CITY ATTORNEY
1 01-0413-33-00 ATTORNEY FEE -CHARGE DEVELOPERS
1 01-0413-33-00 ATTORNEY FEE -CHARGE DEVELOPERS
1 13-0415-23-01
2 60-0433-23-01
3 14-0415-23-01
4 12-0415-23-01
5 07-0420-23-01
6 15-0433-23-01
7 06-0461-23-01
1 15-0433-23-00
2 60-0433-23-00
COBRA ADMIN FEE
COBRA ADMIN FEE
COBRA ADMIN FEE
COBRA ADMIN FEE
COBRA ADMIN FEE
COBRA ADMIN FEE
COBRA ADMIN FEE
HRA BILLING
HRA BILLING
1 14-0413-13-00 TRAVEL & PER DIEM
1 01-0413-34-00 MONITORING ALARM SYSTEMS
1 14-0422-01-00 PUBLIC RELATIONS
2 01-0422-01-00 PUBLIC RELATIONS
3 01-0422-01-00 PUBLIC RELATIONS
4 01-0413-07-00 POSTAGE
5 14-0413-13-00 TRAVEL & PER DIEM
8 09-0463-02-00 EAGLE SATURDAY MARKET
7 15-0437-25-00 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
1 07-0483-01-00 DISPLAY SUPPLIES
2 07-0462-31-00 HIST COMM/OFFICE SUPPLIES
3 07-0463-01-00 DISPLAY SUPPLIES
1
1
1
1
1
07-0482-89-00 MISCELLANEOUS
15-0449-05-00 MTNC & RPR -EQUIP & STRUCTURES
01-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
13-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
07-048231-00 HIST COMM/OFFICE SUPPLIES
1 15-0437-21-00
2 15-0437-20-00
1 15-0437-23-00
1 15-0437-23-00
1 15-0451-01-00
1 15-0455-01-00
1 15-0448-01-00
2 15-0443-02-00
1 15-0452-01-00
FULL TIME GEN MTNC STAFF
GENERAL MTNC PARKS -PATHWAYS
MISCELLANEOUS
MISCELLANEOUS
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR -GROUNDS
MAINT & REPAIR GROUNDS
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
Seq Amount Check Amount
304.00
1.55
592.50
1,914.92 12,378.48
12,376.48
6.00
8.00
8.00
6.00
2.00
2.00
18.00
359.13
44.38
453.51
58.14
100.50
55.85
13.73
14.82
3.31
2.50
13.75
18.82
120.58
5.29
1.30
13.60
20.19
25.00
114.00
57.00
32.31
336.43
368.74
5,000.00
9,527.09
268.28
417.70
1,000.00
1,250.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
1,000.00
453.51
58.14
100.50
120.58
20.19
25.00
114.00
57.00
368.74
21,963.07
City of Eagle Check Register - Transparency Version Page: 8
Jun 11.2012 01:15pm
Date Check No
Total 7492
Payee
06/11/2012 7493 Susan Christenson
08/1112012 7494 Tates Rents
Total 7494
06/11/2012
Total 7495
08/11/2012
06/11/2012
06/11/2012
08/11/2012
Total 7499
06/11/2012
Total 7500
06/11/2012
08/11/2012
08/11/2012
08/11/2012
7495 The Sherwin Williams Co.
7496 Thornton, Rebecca
7497 Treasure Valley Coffee
7498 tw telecom
7499 Valley Times
7500 Venzon Wireless
7501 Wallace Bros Inc.
7502 West Boise YMCA
7503 West Properties, LLC
7504 Western States Equipment
Total 7504
06/11/2012 7505 Wong, John
Totals:
M = Manual Check. V = Void Check
Check Issue Date(s): 05/22/2012 - 06/11/2012
Seq GL Acct No
GL Acct Title
01-0422-05-00 MAYOR'S YOUTH ACTION COUNCIL
01-0422-06-00 FIELD OF HONOR
08-0472-01-00 DEVELOPMENT -SPORTS COMPLEX
15-0437-25-00 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
15-0437-25-00 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
1 15-0448-05-00 MTNC & RPR -EQUIP & STRUCTURES
1
15-0450-01-00 MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GROUNDS
1 60-0220-00-00 WATER/SERVICE DEPOSITS
1 01-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
1 01-0413-19-00 TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
1 14-0413-08-00 LEGAL ADS & PUBUCATIONS
2 01-0413-08-00 LEGAL ADVERTISING/PUBLICATION
1 11-0413-19-00 TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
2 15-0413-19-00 TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
3 13-0413-19-00 TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
4 60-0434-19-00 TELEPHONE & COMMUNICATIONS
5 01-0422-06-00 FIELD OF HONOR
08-0472-01-00 DEVELOPMENT -SPORTS COMPLEX
01-0422-05-00 MAYOR'S YOUTH ACTION COUNCIL
01-0413-05-00 OFFICE EXPENSES
60-0434-58-00 WATER REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
60-0434-58-00 WATER REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
80-0434-58-00 WATER REPAIRIMAINTENANCE
1 60-0220-00-00 WATER/SERVICE DEPOSITS
Seq Amount Check Amount
21,983.07
54.49 54.49
880.00
50.38
759.90
892.66 2,582.94
2,582.94
52.69
52.69 105.38
105.38
43.75 43.75
142.35 142.35
538.44 538.44
84.88
111.38 198.24
196.24
54.33
40.88
80.20
289.55
33.58 478.54
478.54
7,936.00 7,936.00
80.00 80.00
37.80 37.80
193.13
193.13
193.13 579.39
579.39
75.00 75.00
248.738.45 248,738.45
City of Eagle
Date Check No
Dated:
Mayor:
City Council:
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
Check Register - Transparency Version Page: 7
Jun 11, 2012 01:15pm
Check issue Date(s): 05122/2012 - 06/11/2012
Payee Seq GL Acct No GL Acct Title Seq Amount Check Amount
City of Eagle
Unpaid Invoice Report - Eagle Page 1
Invoice Date(s): ALL - 06/3012012 Jun 11, 2012 01 38pm
Inv/Chk Net Invoice
Invoice No Sect Description Type Date Due Date Inv Amount Check Amount GL Acct No
489 Baldwin & Associates. Inc.
158098 1 supplies - CID
158 Valley Times
;V05.25 2012 1 spring valley legal notices -CID
Grand Totals
Inv 05129/2012 06/11/2012 13 49 13 49 01-0413-25-00
Inv 05/25/2012 06/11/2012 273 60 273 60 01-0413-25-00
287 09 287.09
Summary by General Ledger Account Number
GL Acct No
Debit Credit Proof
01-0413-25.00 267,09 00
287 09
0 287 09
Gz
INTER
OFFICE
To:
From:
Subjects:
Date:
Attachment(s):
Copy To:
City of Eagle
Zoning Administration
Project Update
Mayor Reynolds and City Council Members
Nichoel Baird Spencer, MCRP, AICP, Planner III
Northwest Foothills Transportation Plan Update
June 11, 2012
None
William E. Vaughan, ACIP, Zoning Administrator
City Attorney
NOTE: This memo is being provided as a status report and not as an action item. The City Council will
be integrated and invited to the public participation and final decision making process with the ACHD
Commission in the coining months. Staff will continue to keep the Mayor and City Council informed on
the planning process as the project moves forward. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to
contact staff at 489-8772 or by email at rrh<ntdvi rrtltr eag.1c.nrg.
PROJECT BACKGROUND:
The City of Eagle Planning staff has been asked to represent the city on the Northwest Foothills
Transportation Study (NWFTS) Update. The City was one of the key stakeholders in the planning process
in 2008 and the NWFTS was a result of the City's 2007 foothills comprehensive plan. The Northwest
Foothills study area extends from State Highway (SH) 16 west to SH 55 and from Beacon Light Road to
the Ada County limits to the north, see map below. It is important to note that while the plan area is
Beacon light north the traffic operations analysis extended further south to SH 44 in order to analyze the
impact on the City.
Page 1 of 3
K 1Plannmg DeptlTransportation120121NWFrP 1lpdate\NWF P mei doc
The original NWFTS was adopted in 2009 with the understanding that amendments to the plan could be
required if land use projections changed dramatically. Since its adoption, the following actions have
occurred in and around the City of Eagle to bring about the need for this update:
• Update of the Eagle Comprehensive Plan for the Downtown area;
• Completion of the 2010 Census;
• Significant changes in the types, intensity, and frequency of development proposals;
• Plans for two proposed roadways to cross BLM land to serve the M3 development has been
changed to only one roadway crossing extending from Linder Road;
• Update to the COMPASS Communities in Motion (CIM) Long Range Transportation Plan from
the horizon year of 2030 to 2035;
• ACHD Commission decision to not proceed with the proposed Three Cities River Crossing
roadway project;
• Community Infrastructure District formed for Spring Valley by City of Eagle;
• Adoption of the State Street Transit & Traffic Operational Plan (TTOP) by the City of Eagle and
ACHD; and
• Changes in the status of many of the planned developments in the Northwest Foothills area.
The purpose of this NWFTS Update is to develop and analyze revised future land -use and traffic
projections that reflect the changes listed above, as well as a change in horizon year from 2030 to 2035.
This analysis will be used to identify potential modifications to the recommended improvements from the
original NWFTS. The result of this study will be an addendum to the current study that focuses on the key
changes arising from this update, including an updated Preferred Network. A key element of this update
will also be additional information to aid in the implementation of the plan. The NWFTS, with the updated
addendum, will continue to function as a policy guide and corridor preservation mechanism for improving
the transportation system as development occurs in the Northwest Foothills area. Recognizing this
planning process has a 20+ year horizon it is anticipated that over the tenure of the plan additional updates
(similar to this one) can be conducted if the housing market shows a strong and significant recovery.
PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS:
At the June 11th project management team meeting ACHD and their consultant (Kittelson & Associates)
provided the following preliminary analysis to the City.
Changes in the existing PM Weak of existing roadway: The table below shows the changes at PM peak
for existing roadways from 2007 to today (see table on the next page). Notable are the changes in E/W
roadways (Beacon Light & Floating Feather) and the decreases in the NIS roadways (Eagle Road, Linder
and SH55). These changes will be further analyzed through the process. The City has asked that the
following questions be considered:
• What is creating the increased demand on E/W roads?
• What is the demand created from the removal of the 3CRX versus the City's plan?
• What impacts will the removal of the Palmer Hartley Realignment have on Linder Road and Eagle
Road through downtown?
• What is the anticipated travel demand for Downtown Eagle?
Page 2 of 3
K:1Pianning Dept\Transportation120121NWFTP Update\NWFTP me1.doc
Street
Location Existing Volume Previous Volume % Change
Beacon Light Road w/o SH 55 298 170
Eagle Road n/o Beacon Light Road
Floating Feather Road e/o Ballantyne Lane
Linder Road n/o Beacon Light Road
n/o SH 44
SH 55 n/o Floating Feather Road
Under Road
112 160
454
45
230
60
290 240
728 950
75%
-30%
97%
-25%
21%
-23%
Changes in future traffic nroiections: ACHD and their consultant will be conducting a review of how
the foothills transportation network will perform under the 2035 forecasted population and growth within
COMAPSS long range transportation plan (LRTP), updated since the previous NWFTS adoption. This
will establish the estimated regional impact within the system as well as the impacts of the on the planned
network.
Land Use Proiections: Under the previous NWFTS the proposed transportation network was evaluated
for how it would perform at build out (per the City's comprehensive plan). The update will evaluate a
target year of 2035 versus the build out. The reasoning behind the change is linked to the recent economic
downturn in the valley. In 2008 it was estimated that the foothills build out population would be over
24,000 units occurring under a much accelerated growth rate. The consultant has evaluated the current
land use projections for each land holding separately to determine which developments have existing or
active entitlements (i.e.: M3, Avimor & Dry Creek) and to determine which are speculative in nature and
require significant work in order to become viable developments and are anticipated to reduce the
household growth in the foothills by a minimum of 25%.
Due to the change in the foothills "build out" the update will also address transitions and/or thresholds for
improvements, including but not limited to:
• When will additional lanes be required on Linder Road?
• When does an intersection become signalized or require grade separation?
• Can Beacon Light remain as 4 lanes from SH 16 to Linder Road and 3 Lanes from Linder Road
east?
• Does north Eagle Road (Willow Creek Road) continue to need a delay due to impact in Downtown
Eagle?
• At what point in the development of M3 does Linder Road need to be constructed?
• Are grade separated interchanges still necessary along the state highways?
Next Steps: City Staff will continue to work with ACHD, their consultant, and the stakeholder group over
the summer. It is anticipated that the first public participation session will be held in mid to late August.
Page 3 of 3
K.Wlanning Ucpt5Transporia0on120121NWFTP Updat&.NW}TP mei doc
Scenarios
Active Corridors
I
Home Town
Outdoor
Playground
Town & country
Goals
Minimize Congestions
Increase Transportation + Housing
Affordability
Shorter Commutes
Jobs Housing Balnace
Lower Infrastructure
Better access to Parks
Maintaining Agricultural Land
Maintain Environmental Resources
Maintaining Agricultural Land
Walkability
Access to Mixed Use
Metric Met / Unmet
Vehicle Miles Traveled Trend: 7.8 mil
Vehicle Miles Traveled AC: 9.8 mil
NOT MEASURED
Vehicle Miles Traveled Trend: 7.8 mil
Vehicle Miles Traveled HT: 10.2 mil
2010:.62 jobs per household
HT 2040:.45 jobs per household
New Solid waste: Trend 96.5 K
New Solid waste HT 2040: 97.2K
New Water Trend: $595.8 mil
New water HT 2040: $507.9 mil
New Sewer Trend: $401.4 mil
New Sewer HT 2040: $4455.8 mil
Eagle 2010: 10.6% near parks
IOP 2040: 4.5%
Trend Park space/ capita: 9.65 acres/ 1000
OP 2040: 8.4 Acres/ 1000
Eagle Today: 100%
OP 2040: 32%
Trend Homes within the 100 yr floodplain: 22,286
10P 2040: 17, 931
Eagle Today: 100%
TC 2040: 45.8%
Trend population in very high to mod walkable areas: 606,204
TC 2040: 678,771
(Eagle 2010 Population near parks: 10.6%
TC 2040: 4.3%
Eagle 2010 Population near Schools: 9.7%
TC 2040: 3.6%
2010 Eagle Mixed use Score: .27
TC 2040 Mixed use Score: .35
50% Met
20% met
50% met
60% met
".362/4.4
/
k
PC? (tW7C1/
4 2. f 7A -
Please utilize the handouts that were
provided in the May 22"d packet - as
well as the additional items provided
herein.
INTER
OFFICE
City of Eagle
Zoning Administration
Pr v'i6 1
To: Mayor Reynolds and City Council Members
From: Nichoel Baird Spencer, MCRP, AICP, Planner II1 1
?-29i--
Subjects: Communities in Motion (CIM) 2040 — Land Use Scenario Recommendation
Date: June 5, 2012
.Attachrnent(s): Scenario Indicators
Eagle Specific Analysis
CIM 2040 Overview
Area to Area Flow Maps & Analysis
CIM Preliminary Performance Measures
Comparison of CIM Scenarios to City's Comprehensive plan and Demographic
Areas
Copy To: William E. Vaughan, ACIP, Zoning Administrator
City Attorney
NOTE: As the Mayor and Council review this memo it is important to recognize that this is a complex
issue with a large number of variables. This memo was drafted 10 provide the Council both an overview
of the regional issues as well as a recommendation based on previous City policies and Council directives.
Staff will be prepared to address any questions at the June 12'x' meeting or via e-mail and phone before the
meeting.
The Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS) is the regional metropolitan
planning organization (MPO) as required by the federal government for areas with a population over
50,000. COMPASS is required to complete and maintain a regional transportation plan for the
Ada/Canyon county region for a minimum of 25 years into the future. This requirement results in
COMPASS updating the regional long range transportation plan approximately every 4 years. This year as
part of this update, COMPASS conducted a regional scenario building process whereby approximately 170
people across the Ada/Canyon County area were invited to give their thoughts on what the region's land
uses and transportation systems should look like in 2040. COMPASS is now asking for input and
comment on the 4 proposed land use scenarios to develop a hybrid final scenario for use for regional
transportation planning. None of the scenarios are final and no single scenario will be selected; instead
comments will be blended into a new hybrid scenario for adoption.
The public comment period is open from May 7th through June 17th. As such, the Eagle City Staff has
sought input from the Eagle Transportation Committee and the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission to
aid the City Council in formulating comments to be sent to COMPASS. The combined recommendations
of the City's Transportation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission are shown below.
Page 1 of 4
K'Planning DcptiTransponauonl2012 C@1 2040 pz cc mc2 doc
At the June 12t1i City Council meeting staff will walk the City Council through a "meeting in a bag"
process established by COMPASS for the public comment period. While the COMPASS' "meeting in a
bag" provides a good regional view of the 4 proposed scenarios staff has provided some additional material
in order to help the Council understand the differences of the various scenarios when compared to the
build out of the City's adopted comprehensive Plan. These documents include:
26 Scenario Indicators: These indicators compare the 4 proposed scenarios to trend (the current pattern of
growth), the existing CIM Plan, and an additional model proposed from the scenario building process.
These indicators include future housing mix, vehicle miles travelled, new homes within the 100 year
flood plain, and may other uniformed statistics for comparison.
Eagle Specific Analysis: This analysis shows how the 4 proposed scenarios perform within the City of
Eagle. assuming the City changes its land use patterns.
Area to Area Flow Maps & Analysis: This analysis shows where trips within the Valley are moving per
the 4 growth scenarios.
CIM Preliminary Performance Measures: Analysis of how the 4 proposed scenarios compare to
standardized metrics such as: vehicle miles travelled (VMT), transit ridership, and miles of road at or
below capacity.
Comparison of CIM Scenarios to City's Comprehensive Plan and Demographic Areas: While the
City staff recognizes the mandate for COMPASS to plan for a transportation system through 2040 staff
does not support using a regional land planning process to replace and/or diminish the local land use
authority established by Idaho Code. Staff has prepared a comparison of the 4 proposed scenarios to
the City's comprehensive plan so that the regional vision can be compared to the vision of the City's
residents. The table of planning areas and 4 City maps use the following scale to evaluate growth in
comparison to the City's comprehensive plan at build out:
Growth Index Compared to the City's Comp
Plan
Greater growth than
planned
Similar growth to City
Plan
greater than 200%
101 to 200%
51 to 100%
20 to 50%
+/- 20%
Less growth than 21 to 50%
planned -51 to -100%
No growth allocated
Note: 0% equals the growth in the City's plan
Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation:
On June 4, 2012, after reviewing the scenarios and the recommendations from the Eagle Transportation
Committee, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 3 to 0 (with 1 abstention*) to recommend to the
City Council the Town and Country Scenario for the following reasons: 1) It is the role of City (not
Page 2 of 4
K Planning Dept 'Transponauon&20121CIM 2040 pz cc me2 doe
COMPASS) to identify the future course of action that maximizes the benefit to Eagle residents; 2) The
Town & Country Scenario more closely mirrors the City's established development patterns from the
City's comprehensive plan including the SH44 corridor; and 3) It maximizes the population in Eagle thus
providing the strongest case for increased federal funding of regional infrastructure within the City (see
growth chart under #4 below). Additionally, the Commission supported the following comments for
consideration by the City Council:
*Note: Commissioner Tanner abstained from voting stating that though he recognized the importance of
the City's recommendation he felt it is a very complex issue and he was not ready to make a
recommendation.
1. It is not the role of COMPASS or any other jurisdiction to dictate the future land use patterns for
the City of Eagle. This is the role and responsibility of the City of Eagle and individual land
owners. The City should not abdicate this authority to anyone.
2. The City does not support the use of a regional land use scenario that is in conflict with the locally
adopted land use plans as required under Idaho Code 67-6509. The use of conflicting land use
plans will create confusion at: 1) The local Level: For citizens who bought homes and land based
on the City's comprehensive plan and now see "regional" land use plan that is not consistent with
their understood vision of the community; 2) The Rea,ional Level: Between the City, COMPASS.
ACHD and other service providers in determining what is '`planned growth"- Do you use the
City's plan or the "regional" plan to determine capacity and need?; and 3) The Federal Level:
When/if transportation projects (using federal funding) are designed to meet the regional vision
they will not meet the local vision and needs of the City, our citizens, and development patterns
actually occurring in the City.
3. Without having the preliminary performance measures completed for the City's comprehensive
plan it is very difficult to provide a meaningful evaluation of the scenarios. How do the individual
City's plans compare to the 4 scenarios? COMPASS should provide each jurisdiction this analysis
before adopting a preferred alternative or hybrid scenario.
4. The City supports the population and employment growth forecast/allocations for the City of
Eagle. The City's comprehensive plan calls for a 4% annual average growth rate (recognizing
some years will be less and others will be more). All 4 of the scenarios are reasonably consistent
with the City's adopted growth rate. A comparison of the 4 proposed scenario growth rates to the
City's adopted rate are shown in the table below:
7..
5...
a^.
7..
i
c.
•
1
a. - o -a v¢
a. vcv
, c
E E a£ a
£
v v v v 1 v
City ACttve Cc.rr.dors Home To:.ns Outdoor To. n& Country
C omP Playground
Plan j
Page 3 of 4
K Planning Dept\Transportation\2012\CIM 2040 pz cc me2 doc
5. The City recommends the use of the City's comprehensive plan as the guide for allocating growth
within specific areas of the City. The proposed scenarios, while regionally established, do not
reflect the opinions and desires of the citizens of the City of Eagle. While great effort was made to
select 170 regional participants to draft the scenarios, the 170 regional participants (few of which
are from the City of Eagle) pale in comparison to the thousands of residents that have participated
in the drafting, reviewing, and the public hearing processes that has resulted in the City's adopted
comprehensive plan. Some of the most notable comments include:
a. The scenarios ignore the 5 -acres rural area north of Beacon Light Road (City demographic
area A). The rural tier of the City is a unique and Eagle specific land use pattern that has
been woven in to the fabric of the community and has given rise to the colloquialism
"Rurban" meaning rural in an urban setting that is part of the City adopted comprehensive
plan;
b. The scenarios allocate only 3% to 37% of the 7,000 units that were entitled to M3 within
the City's demographic area K. 1DWR recently approved a water right application and
growth scenario showing M3 developed out by 2041. At a minimum, the scenarios should
address the currently entitled developments within the City including M3;
c. Three of the scenarios allocate 192% to 637% more population than the City's
comprehensive plan within the Boise River Floodplain and on Eagle Island (City
demographic areas 0 and G). These areas are identified as special and sensitive areas
within the City's comprehensive plan. Any scenario that allocated increasing density in
these areas should not be considered;
d. City supports increasing jobs/employment and housing in the downtown area to be
consistent with the City's recently adopted Downtown Eagle Plan (the City demographic
areas R and T);
6. Without an understanding of the roadway and transit system investments within each scenario it is
hard to compare the scenarios. COMPASS should provide each jurisdiction this analysis before
adopting a preferred alternative or hybrid scenario.
7. The City supports the demographic allocations and increased transportation investments along
State Street consistent with State Street Traffic and Transit Operations Plan (TTOP) adopted by
the City of Eagle in 2011. The TTOP demographic allocations and development patterns are
consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan.
8. The City supports the expansion of State Highway 16 from State Highway 44 to I-8-1 but is unclear
which scenario includes this improvement.
Staff will be prepared to provide a complete overview of this information as well as lead the Council
through an overview of the CIM process at the June 12th City Council meeting. If you have any questions
please don't hesitate to contact staff at 489-8772 or by email at nbaird a cit' ofeade.on2.
Page 4 of 4
K Banning Dep+Transponanon101 PCIM 2040 pz cc mc? doc
City
Scenario
Local lobs -Housing Balance
Eagle
Active Outdoor Town and
2010 Corridors Hometowns Playground Country
0 62 0.43 0 45 0.67 0.34
The ratio of jobs and housing in a community, which helps reduce commuting.
5 3% 37.2% 22.2% 12.7% 41.1%
1M45.8% 27.7% 14.9% 46.4%
Percent of multifamily (such as condos and apartments) is a measure to help under the mix of different housing types,
which provides more choice in affordability and location.
Multifamily Percent for Total Homes
Average Mixed Use Score
027 036 0.34 031 035
t ntropy score 10 to 11 analyzing how balanced the uses are in neighborhood, and the averaged for the region A low scorn
means mostly t use. while a high score means an oven mix of uses
Traffic C,ongestlon (vehicle hours of delay)
Traffic: Congestion (Lane Miles Mo then 40% Over Capacity)
The amount of traffic In a community, measured by the number of roads that are over capacity
pulatton in Major Activity Centers
8
501 552 813 744
Park Spate per 1,000 People
Percent of Existing Farmland Preserved
Percent of agricultural land undeveloped and used for farming
100.0% 32.8% 20.3% 32 0% 45.8%
New Capital Sewer Costs (millions)
New Capital Water Costs (millions)
$59.9 $52.1
$76.7 $68.8
$49.6 $96.9
$59.2 $109.0
Estimated cost (In millions of dollars) to provide new water and sewer infrastructure to additional homes and businesses.
Access to Existing Bus Routes
Housing + Transportation Affordability
Population near parks
ercent Population in Low Walkable Areas
ercent Population In Med Walkable Areas
ercent Population in High Walkable Areas
ercent Population in Very High Walkable Areas
Access to Existing with Valley Connect Plan Improvements
Access to Existing, VC Plan and an East-West High Capacity Route
Access to Existing, VC Plan, and E -W and tf
0.2% 1.2% 1.0% 0.7% 1.4%
6.3% 5.7% 5.7% 7 5%
12 8% 10.2% 11 1% 13.9%
31 5% 27.3% 27 5% 37.8%
Percent of population within a 10 -minute walk to current or future transit stops.
31.9% 31.4% 33.5% 26.8%
38 2% 43.5% 43.0% 50.8%
27.7% 22.7% 23.5% 20.7%
2.3% 2.4% 0.1% 1.6%
A measure of how convenient it is to walk between home, work and services within a neighborhood
Population near schools
10 6% 4.0% 4.2% 4.5% 4.3%
9.7%
3.8% 4 0%
The percentage of population within a 10 -minute walk to current or future parks and schools
Housing Affordability
4.7% 3.6%
The weighted average of annual costs for housing and transportation based on type of housing and distance to jobs.
New Mlles of Roadway
199 210 252
New roads required to service development in areas where existing infrastructure is not adequate.
241
- 00000I
- 00000Z
1
- 00000£
L£6"6L£
puaa1
00000b
ZbS'ITb T08'TTb
111 37
$t6`99t
punaAAeld Joapan0
6T0'Lbb
SUMolaWOH
0I0"98b
saoppion ani1.Jy
- 00000s
- 000009
sl!un 2umaMQ O iOZ
1200000 -
1000000 -
800000 -
600000 -
400000 -
200000
0
Trend CC
1,022,239 1,020,967
2040 Total Population
ITT
1,017,559
Active Corridors
1,015,892
Hometowns Town and Country Outdoor Playground
1,020,453 1,020,685 1,022,936
600000
500000 -
400000
300000 -.
200000
100000
0
Trend
452,427
CC
480,051
2040 Total Employees
TTT
395,870
molompuompummoor
Active Corridors
463,536
Hometowns
459,301
Town and Country Outdoor Playground
464,735 459,690
Employment: New Non -Residential Square Feet Mix
Trend
Active Corridors
Choices
Hometowns
TTT
Town anc Country
Outdoor
Playground
Ago ti
Retail NI Office 1111110ther
9L6' L L
asipeaed aoop}np
L'LV
Ai!wed apuisis A weplinW
%£'ZS
Aalunop pue unnol
%0'ZL
sumolawoH
%S'Lb
saopiaaop angPV
%9"98 %"1•Z6
9%'£T
111
saaioq3
xiw pioyasnoH nnaN :Su!snoH
puaal
punoiOAeid Joopino Aaluno0 pue uMo1 suMolawoH sJop!Jo0 aNPV 111 00 puaJI
00005
punoJ
Aew JO
pin0 Ailun
op pue
molawi
• £9'L£T
iJio0 a
00000T
puaii
co
0000SL
m
Z£b'68
eAeId Jo
619'Z6
Molaw.
b8T'68
uJop a
Aalun
op pue
- 00000Z
- 0000SZ
00000E
arum - sued aeau uoileindod OtOZ
aDinaas sn8 2ui1six3 ss833d yMnn uoReindod OtiOZ
69Z'tiST
wok a
punoJ Aeld aoopino luluno0 pue UMol suMolawoH saop!JJo0 ani1JV 111
punoa
puno
P1nO AJlu
P1n0
/ulur
oD pue
MOl
Mol
s
ESWLET
H
sJo
sJo
PV
!PV
917E `91 i
111
33 puail
TTL"OZI
33
aliwH - Jn pue sng peau uouleindod ObOZ oI!wO - DA pue sng Jeau uoileindod 0170Z
aDinaas sn8 lsngoj pauuoD AalleA ssaxrd yoinn uopelndod otoz
0
- 00005
- 0000ST
v
m3
- 00000Z .°a
m
- 0000SZ
- 00000E
- 0000Sg
- 0000017
O'IOV
punoAAeid Joop:no
punoi Aeld Joopino Ai unoj pue uMol ,. suMo1awoH sJoppJoJ aAflJV J LL JJ
S'68Z
Aalunop pue uMoj
9-Z6E
suMo1aw°H
puaJ1 -
slsoO aDueua4u!ew peoj nnaN Ot7OZ
Z"9Z9
JJ
0
00T
o0z
- 00E
o'
N
- 00b
O0S
009
- OOL
pun0JSAeld
loomo
suMolawoH
siopuwoo anIPV
puaJ1.
S'OZ
punoJSAeld _loop1no Z•ZZ
Ailuno3 pue ureic)!
Z'61
suMoiawoH
9'0Z
sJop!JOJ anIPV
Z'9E
punaiSAeld .ioopino
6'ZE
0'VE
TOE
s'TE
Z'SZ
9.9Z
I'EES-6Z
111
8'VE
suMolawoH
S'6Z
DD
8-9Z
I'SZ
pupil
8'6E
AalunoD pue uMol
S'6E
sJop!Jo3 anIJJV
aIeIS M3 DA eaay aSeaanop aainaaS T!sueal OVOZ
anw H JA eaay aSeaano0 pampas l!Suea! OVOZ
apw H eaay aSeaanop 8Dinaas 1!sueil 01702
suogdp 4!sueJl Jo saanum OZ u!q !M uopeindod to lua)Jad OtiOZ
TTT
499,172
TIT
g39,97:
e Corri
e 23,65 ,
100%
90%
80% -
70%
60% -i
in
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Trend
155,329
Trend
438,92
Trend
416,035
0%
Trend
2040 Population in Walkable Areas
2040 Population in Low Walkable Areas 2040 Population in Med Walkable Areas
X 2040 Population in High Walkable Areas ' 2040 Population in Very High Walkable Areas
CC
TTT
;174,775
TTT
23,363
: leve Corric4a
di
1281,027 ` `
Acti
ve Corri
387,850
Acti
ors
ors
24,553
'ometowo5
z.1 X231,747
Town and Coq.
'.239,7541
for Playgc '
2] 1,809 Fn
Active Corridors Hometowns Town and Country Outdoor Playground
2
100% -
90% -
80% -
70% -
60%
50%
40%
30.5
20:5
10%
0%
9,739
Trend
83,028
Trend
313,358
Trend
46,302
Trend
2040 Employment in Walkable Areas
2040 Employment in Low Walkable Areas 2040 Employment in Med Walkable Areas
■ 2040 Employees in High Walkable Areas 2040 Employees in Very High Walkable Areas
.CC
TTT
80,674
nr
56,083
23,605
.Active Corridors'
".:136,699:
Acti
Acti
e Corri
t
64,253
ors
0r5
H
. metow
118,978
_26,635
246,784
s
Hometowns
66,903
fOraioor Playg
r 117,087
Town and Country Outdoor Playground
105,840 104,883
TTT Active Corridors Hometowns Town and Country Outdoor Playground
12000000 -
10000000 -
8000000
1
6000000
2
4000000
2000000 -
0
2040 New Vehicle Miles Traveled
CC
9,104,412
Trend
7,893,535
Active Corridors
9,842,805
Hometowns
9,045,196
TTT
7,431,148
Town and Country
10,272,143
- Trend CC TTT • Active Corridors - Hometowns - Town and Country Outdoor Playground
Outdoor Playground
9,317,605
punoJaAeld loopinp . lulunop pue uMol �. suMolaWoH _ SaopIJo0 anihy . LLL - J0
puaal
0000Z
0000b
00009
ZSO"L9
m
£8£`£9
pua.il
8SL'8L
suMolawoH
- 00008
8S1 'I6 18C06
puno�BAeld Joopinp Uluno. pue uMol
08Z"86
Si0puJoD a Apt"
00000t
0000ZI
sialueD Ampd ui uoReindod OtiOZ ailleaH
90£'O1769L'Lb ObS'Zb
punoJneid poop}n0 £ZS`Sb suMo}awoH sJopIJo0 a 1P
Ailunoj pue utol
OSS'b£
111
S00'£'
puaJl.
0000b
- 00009;
Ob9'9L
S8i'£L
puaii
Z£b'68
,.unOJneid Joop1nO
6bb'8•.
AJlunop pue uMol
6/9'Z6
suMo)awoH
b8T'68
sJop!Joo anpo
08Z'£8
77
ID
- 00008 .°a
ID
s)Iaed 2upsix3 aeaN uoRelndod OVOZ
a�iwH - sloogDs.eau uopeindod OVOZ al!wt) - sloops.eau uopeindod OVOZ -
£b6`6£
SUMO awoH
£S8"L£
s.opu.o0 an!PV
ZL9'IE
St7L'O£
pua.l
0000Z.
000017
00009
£8S'i t I
punoAAeld .00pinp 995'911
AJluno0 pue uMol
06b'£OT
91S'601 s.opi..o.) an
SUMolawoH
- 000011
000017
- 00009t
000081
sloops Sugsix3 JeaN uoReindod O1OZ :yfleaH
saopuJoJ @nippy - 111— JJ
puaJ1
6E9
saoppioj ani;oy
EZ -L
JJ
1
ZS'S
sumo:awOH
9S-6
puaJI
elided aad aDedS lied OtiOZ :4fleaH
SZ6`6
punoaAeId Joop3n0
punoi2Aeld Joopin0 AJlunop pue UMOI sumolawoH _ sJoppioD anpv . 111- » pupil .
Ob9"9T
A.ilunaD pue umol
L6C9I
sumolawoH
tL6`9I
siopuJo0 anIJV
899"ZZ
ZEb'6T
DD
sea.id anmsuas AIleIuawuoJinu3 upp,m sasnoH o oz
Ib9`6Z
puail
0
- 0005
- 0000T
- 000ST
- 0000Z
000SZ
- 0000E
- 000SE
x
0
m
40000 -
35000 -
30000 -
25000 -
u,
3 20000 -
0
15000 -
10000
5000 -
0 -
Trend
22,286
2040 Houses within 100 Year Floodplain
CC
27,948
TIT
30,160
Active Corridors
31,170
Hometowns
31,570
Town and Country
37,302
Trend CC — TTT Active Corridors ' Hometowns T own and Country " Outdoor Playground
Outdoor Playground
17,931
•
OLE VI EZS'ST
OLO'6Z
sumo3aup3H
£0S'
sJopp.ico a
LEE'VS
111
sanv puelwied 2u!u!ewaa OVOZ • sa0y puelwied padolanaa MaN OVOZ
puei aJnlinDia2d padoianaa :puelunej
ELY
pua,i
- 0000 -
00000T
0000ST o
00000Z
0000SZ
00000£
9'5817 5'005
punoJBAeld aoopin0 AJluno3 pue umol
6"L05
sumolawoH sJoppioD enipy
41t1
L'ZIb
punoJBAeId Joopinp 8"S517
Aalunop pue umoI
97017
sumolawoH
L'Ibb
sJoppioJ aA PV
9'995
8'565
111 £"L59 puaii
DD
S"8Lb
DD
b"I0b
puaJ!
00'0
00.00z
00.00b
00'009
00'008
- 00'000I
00"00ZI
slsop Jamas Iel!de0 maN slsop JaleM maN -
SlSO.)
iel!deD aanpn.ilseijui Jannas pue jaleM nnaN :aanpnaEseilui AliunwWOD
punoa2Aeld Joopino „ AJlunoJ pue wwoj „ sumolawoH saopuJo3 anipy . flj jj puaij
- 0000s
SZI'ZII
A4unop pue UMOj
Sb4'SZI
punoAAJoopino
ESS'Ibt
suMolawoH
ZL0'08T
puau
000002
0000SZ
aseaJDui uogeindod asn MaN
punoJOAeid JoopinO „ AJ1uno0 pue uMol sumolawoH . sJopiJJo3 anihy . 111 33
puaJ1 .r,..
OOSZT
000£1
005E1
000vT
Z£0'tT
AJlunop pue uMol
608"tr1
punoJOAeid JoopinO
ZS9'VE
sJopUJoD aniPV
98L'bI
6Sb"ST
suMolawOH
00091
00S9T
£OL'9T
puaJI
- 000LT
uogeaauaD aaaennalsem nnaN
Tons per Year
105000
100000
95000
90000 -
85000
80000 -
Trend
96,508
New Solid Waste Generation
CC
100,404
TIT
87,456
Active Corridors Hometowns
97,212 97,260
Ipmetradimmoirmartj
Town and Country
QS 098 Outdoor Playground
97,685
Trend CC TTT Active Corridors — Hometowns Town and Country Outdoor Playground