Collection of Fee - 1999 - Capital Improvement Plan May 11, 1999 - 5/11/1999 CITY OF EAGLE
Development Impact Fee Study / Capital Improvements Plan
Prepared for:
City of Eagle
310 East State Street
Eagle, ID 83616
Prepared by:
Hofman Planning Associates
P.O. Box 208
Laclede, Idaho 83941
1.800.433.4460
Approved by the City Council:
May 11, 1999
Individuals Responsible for the Preparation of this Study:
CITY OF EAGLE
Nancy Merrill, City Council Member
Mark Butler, Zoning Administrator
Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Diane Anderson
John Hendricks
Georgia Mackley
Ted Martinez
Ed Salvi
HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES
Bill Hofman, President
Stan Weiler, Principal Planner
Niko Carrigan, Associate Planner
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
INTRODUCTION 4
BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS 6
I. INTRODUCTION 6
II. STUDY AREA 6
III. RESIDENTIAL PROJECTIONS 8
PARK FACILITIES 12
I. INTRODUCTION 12
II. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD 12
III. PARK FACILITIES ANALYSIS 12
A. Existing Facilities Analysis 12
B. Build Out Requirements 15
IV. PARK FACILITIES FINANCING 16
A. Facility Costs To Meet Existing Demand 16
B. Facility Costs To Meet Build Out Demand 17
C. Fee Calculation 18
D. Optional Financing Mechanisms 18
PATHWAY FACILITIES 20
I. INTRODUCTION 20
II. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD 20
M. PATHWAY FACILITIES ANALYSIS 20
A. Existing Facilities Analysis 20
B. Build Out Requirements 24
IV. PATHWAY FACILITIES FINANCING 24
A. Facility Costs To Meet Existing Demand 25
B. Facility Costs To Meet Build Out Demand 25
C. Fee Calculation 26
D. Optional Financing Mechanisms 28
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 29
I. INTRODUCTION 29
II. RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS 30
III. PARK FACILITIES PHASING 32
IV. PATHWAY FACILITIES PHASING 34
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan
FINANCING OPTIONS 36
I. INTRODUCTION 36
A. General Taxes 36
B. Dedicated Taxes 36
C. State-shared Revenues 36
D. Local Bond Issues 36
E. Impact Fees 37
F. User Fees 37
G. Special Districts 37
H. State Grants and Assistance Programs 38
I. Federal Assistance 38
II. SUMMARY 38
IMPLEMENTATION 39
I. INTRODUCTION 39
II. TIMING OF FEE COLLECTION 39
III. FEE COLLECTION METHOD 39
CONCLUSION 41
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit Title Page
Exhibit 1 Area of Impact 7
Exhibit 2 City of Eagle - Comprehensive Land Use Plan 9
Exhibit 3 City of Eagle - Park Location Map 14
Exhibit 4 City of Eagle - Pathway Plan 22
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title Page
Table 1 Impact Fee Summary 3
Table 2 Park Facilities Fee Calculation 19
Table 3 Proposed Pathways Inventory (With Developer Contribution) 23
Table 4 Pathway Facilities Fee Calculation 27
Table 5 Residential Phasing Projections 31
Table 6 Park Facilities Phasing 33
Table 7 Pathway Facilities Phasing 35
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following is a summary of the results of the park facilities and pathway facilities analysis and
the resulting development impact fees that will be necessary to fund the required facilities. The
facilities analyses provide the background information used in the preparation of the required
Capital Improvement Plan and includes the following: an inventory of existing facilities, projected
build-out projections, adopted level of service standards, an assessment of the need for new
facilities to serve the build-out population, an estimate of the costs to provide those facilities, and
the identification of alternative ways to fund these facilities. The development impact fee is one
of the alternative funding mechanisms and, when implemented, it will provide a means by which
future development will pay for the costs for future park facilities and pathway facilities
improvements needed and created by said future development.
Two definitions will be helpful in understanding this executive summary:
Build Out Projections-the residential forecast of growth within the Area of Impact from
the present time until all available land has been developed to the extent realistically
permitted by the terrain and the Comprehensive Plan. Build out projections are not time
dependent.
Level of Service Standard - A performance standard applied to a facility ensures that
adequate public facilities are provided at a desirable level. This standard can be population
based or square footage based depending on the facility. For park facilities and pathway
facilities, the level of service standard is population based.
The findings of this study can be summarized as follows:
BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS:
Existing Dwelling Units - 4,183
Future Dwelling Units - 10,802
Build Out Dwelling Units - 14,985
Build Out Population- 38,062
PUBLIC FACILITIES ANALYSIS:
Park Facilities -
Level of Service Standard - 3.3 Acres / 1,000 Population
Existing Facilities - 4.08 Acres
Existing Demand - 35.06 Acres
Existing Surplus/<Deficiency>- <30.98>Acres
Build Out Demand - 125.60 Acres
Additional Facilities Needed at Build Out- 121.52 Acres
Estimated Costs to be Funded by Impact Fees - $5,894,503.66
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 1
Pathway Facilities -
Level of Service Standard - 4,670 Linear Feet / 1,000 Population
Existing Facilities - 25,950 LF
Existing Demand - 49,615.96 LF
Existing Surplus/<Deficiency>- <23,665.96> LF
Build Out Demand - 177,742.10 LF
Additional Facilities Needed at Build Out - 151,792.10 LF
Estimated Costs to be Funded by Impact Fees - $1,592,001.62
Based on the build out projections and the facilities analysis conducted, the following table
provides the recommended development impact fees for parks and pathways within the City of
Eagle.
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 2
Table 1
Impact Fee Summary
Facility Per Dwelling
Unit Fee
Parks $545.69
Paths $147.38
Total $693.07
May 11, 1999
INTRODUCTION
The City of Eagle has experienced rapid growth during the last few years and this growth is
expected to continue at a moderate pace. As this growth proceeds, increasing demands will be
placed on the city's public facilities and services. Construction of new facilities will be required
to meet this new demand. The City has made the decision that new development must pay for the
new parks and new pathways necessary to support this new development. The City has chosen
a development impact fee program as the primary funding mechanism to pay for park facilities and
pathway facilities required to serve new development.
The purpose of this study is to provide the necessary support data to establish a development
impact fee and a Capital Improvements Plan for the identified facilities in conformance with Idaho
Code, Title 67. State Government and State Affairs, Chapter 82. Development Impact Fees (the
"Idaho Development Impact Fee Act"). The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act is the state
enabling legislation that allows for impact fees to be collected by a local jurisdiction and sets the
parameters to ensure that the impact fees are fair and equitable. The required contents of the
Development Impact Fee Study/ Capital Improvements Plan is outlined in Section 67-8206(2) of
the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act. This Act specifies that a Capital Improvements Plan
(CIP) must be provided to allow for the collection of impact fees. The CIP must include the
following information:
•A general description of existing facilities
•A commitment by the City to cure existing deficiencies
•An analysis of capacity and current level of use
•A description of land use assumptions
•An inventory of existing facilities
•A table establishing specific levels of use or consumption by service unit
•A description of all improvements and costs
•The total number of service units attributed by new development
•The projected demand for improvements
•Identification of funding sources
•A time schedule for the commencement and completion of improvements
Throughout this report, the Development Impact Fee Study / Capital Improvements Plan will be
referred to as the 'study'. This study, in conjunction with the Development Impact Fee Ordinance
for the City of Eagle, is in compliance with the Development Impact Fee Act. In addition to
providing the methodology to determine a development impact fee, this study also serves as the
capital improvement plan for park and pathway facilities. The format of this study is such that it
is as easy to follow as possible without sacrificing the detail necessary to withstand close scrutiny,
either legal or otherwise.
The Development Impact Fee Study identifies build out projections for the City of Eagle and those
areas outside the city limits that are within the City's Area of Impact. The build out projections
are based on the land use designations of the City's Comprehensive Plan. These build out
projections are used to determine the projected impacts to park facilities and pathway facilities
created by future development. The demand for facilities requires an analysis of the type and the
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 4
extent of the needed facilities. Once this is completed, a cost to meet the demand can then be
determined. These costs are identified and utilized in this study as a part of the methodology to
provide the necessary rational nexus between the public facility improvement needs and the impact
fee to be paid by future development.
Table 1 on page 3 is a summary of the calculated development impact fees based on the growth
assumptions of this study. The results of the study are based on considerable research and analysis.
The derivation of the fees can be followed by the documentation and methodology contained in
this study.
The Facilities Analysis
The first step of this study was to inventory land uses and existing park facilities and pathway
facilities. The land use and facility inventories of the City of Eagle were developed from land use
maps, existing reports, on-site visual observations and consultation with the City of Eagle staff.
The two facilities included in the inventory and this study are:
• Parks;
• Pathways
The next step in the facilities analysis was to obtain build-out projections. These projections,
which provided an essential basis for the rest of the process, are explained in detail in the Build
Out Projections chapter.
Step three in the facilities analysis process was to establish Level of Service standards (LOS) for
both the park and the pathway facilities. A level of service standard is a statement of policy that
specifies the quantity and/or quality of service that a city intends to provide to its citizens. Once
the level of service standards were adopted by the City,existing facility deficiencies(i.e., facilities
that are not adequate to serve the present population)were identified along with the projected need
for additional facilities at build-out.
The fourth step in preparing the facilities analysis was to make cost estimates for the new or
expanded facilities that will be needed at build out.
The Development Impact Fee
The City Council has determined that development impact fees should be a primary funding
mechanism to finance future park facilities and pathway facilities improvements needed to serve
new development. The facilities analysis provides the necessary information to establish a
development impact fee program for the City of Eagle. There are provisions in the Idaho
Development Impact Fee Act which allows for the modification and updating of the development
impact fees. Additionally, the Act (Section 67-8208(2)) requires that all Capital Improvements
Plans are updated every five (5) years.
The final result of the research, discussions, analysis and re-analysis is a development impact fee
study and ordinance that reflect both professional expertise and local experience.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 5
BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS
INTRODUCTION
The build out projections discussed in this report forecasts residential growth within the
City of Eagle's area of impact from the present time until all available land has been
developed to the extent realistically permitted by the terrain and local land use regulations.
The purpose of such a projection is to help City Council members as well as other local
decision makers know today the extent of the public facilities and services that will be
needed to serve new development.
The residential build out projection is determined by the type of residential land use
designation and the assumed number of dwelling units per acre. Population projections are
determined based on the ultimate number of dwelling units projected and the population
generation rate.
Build out projections are not time dependent. The time it will take a community to reach
build out will vary depending on many factors, not least of which are the inevitable
economic swings of a region. For this reason, this analysis does not attempt to predict
when build out will occur nor does it predict yearly growth rates.
For purposes of planning and budgeting for needed park facilities and pathway facilities,
it is advisable to make short term projections (from three to five years). However, a
community should not lock into such predictions, but instead should monitor its growth
and the subsequent demands on its public facilities constantly and make adjustments in its
facility planning.
Public facility planning is a dynamic process which begins with an accurate assessment of
potential build out scenarios. The steps to develop accurate build out projections are:
1) Define the study area;
2) Determine the number of existing residential units and calculate the existing
population;
3) Determine the remaining vacant acres;
4) Estimate the residential build out projections.
II. STUDY AREA
The study area is defined as the "Area of Impact" as identified on the City of Eagle
Comprehensive Land Use Plan. This area is shown on Exhibit 1 on page 7. As specified
previously, the study area includes those lands which are outside the existing city limits,
but within the city's area of impact. For purposes of public facility planning, it is assumed
that these areas will eventually be serviced by the City of Eagle.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 6
I
Area of Impact
Boundary
Homer Road
LiBeacon Li.ht Road
l' I
cc
m
c w
i :3! Floating Fe=they Road '\
a
c'
State Hwy 44 U � �
!
! S41.9%et
ILI - -..
!
Chinden Road
1
•
Cl of Eagle it
W ir, E
Area of Impact S
No Scale
Prepared by Hofman Planning Associates
April 1999
III. RESIDENTIAL PROJECTIONS
The Residential Projections chapter provides the amount of existing residential
development and predicts future residential growth based on the most current land use
designations. These land use designations are provided by the City of Eagle
Comprehensive Land Use Plan as depicted on Exhibit 2 on page 9. The land use
assumptions and the methodology used to determine the build out of the City of Eagle are
explained in this chapter.
This section is divided into Existing Residential Development Inventory and Build Out
Residential Projections.
A. Existing Residential Development Inventory
The Ada Planning Association (APA) prepared a demographic report which
analyzed the number of existing households and the employment rate for the City
of Eagle's area of impact. According to the APA report, the number of existing
units within the City of Eagle area of impact in 1996 was 3,573. This figure was
increased to 4,183 to account for new home building permits issued since that time
through January 19, 1999. The existing population was then determined by
multiplying the existing dwelling units by a population generation rate of 2.541
persons per dwelling unit. The calculations indicate that the existing population is
10,625 persons as shown in the table below.
EXISTING DWELLING UNITS AND POPULATION
EXISTING DWELLING EXISTING POPULATION
UNITS
4.183 10,625
1990 Census
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 8
J __,,____ _____.__,_________:,:.. -1- -• ; ,-, i _. .
........ rat` 1111.\=>:;""`'_,--\'• ---• +`.- ! r:,-:-` ,r ^ ! _� (� ' I �I ,yy I ..�. _ I
-- _ _ _/�
cur ft x 1 1
1, drl } I � " I ° �_
! 17 --r"..-- 1 ,,'-'''' ---: ",.-„,1,,,,:,,/,,,i,,;If 11- — i - ' 1---'--- 1— I \ . ‘ , '
r
J I
r:
f l
' _ter j f,,�� l Linder d j _
___,A1f i ..rti,�— - _ • =.6.=,....-----..1.____11 � os 3�c _, ( �o — ,
c_;-___.1 ''I .\ ,, X ...1 r—.—__ x _ i 1.____i; 'S�ryt -_ �1 -,..i I -i I 1 in t _d
ig
"7 ,' .t' ,,-, B dy -�' I _ I , r II .r� 1 - '4--�'.( / I I I j----� -_....r '{ 1 I_.--
-4 ...��
r EX' 'o' r� r..J__._' — it N---)----P\'''._r i _` -_ \�f '�
1
I —h
I [irñ
„ 4-�.;—� I � � rr r; �l __'-•.'',", `^ -�_i T � .J —_ —, yl _ -- -j - I' li-
I f ii
F.
r 1 L__ CD 3 1 �' _5 '� p p fi
iI t� + __ '' I 1ri -
I
. ... C ' .
I_, cn , d! i , Il
t it AIL I =i I I l i
ili I
I I ,
/— l.p,11,111,_ 1 ;. -, �J 1 r s
iir__-_-1:11.___-(.1-:._. •i-i-i. ,,‘ .. :1, . _R-, . ., - . -,,, r______ ___ __p r:.1_T.II:r 4 '� -1.?�) C � .7 - _.- i--- -- r� �X� -i � _ ����� - 1 i `L.�_ ���� h� �—�T r h...,:,,__T__________.1.,I i.,,,.,.. ,,, ,,_,..„,,,,,...f.,/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,., r __________I__c____„ •
' �I �g � .,r,1-1.7_1c-i,—; ! i -r lantyne R :_ � ;i I �1^ I
r
17111�------ ( -„,:,, --,---,�:. ,, —__ • 'I I�{ •,� .maw-..1,.- ' �7=. -
f �� I al � � I�
1 „l _ 1 i f IIJ
�� 1F --1 a __ i.. u r, t' -Hi_--- \ —_ :, Ls•` 11I �i 1 i _.( I ._l.-L.._
1 M
Li'• ' ' r 1 N.i.. ��h, :yr�;r'r,X ( I i i�-'�-r;� _ i� y id-- -
�'" I (-7,\./ r I - _
F-17.1 1 .'../J , ,-, -, - i F i "w: !• T�� i ...�- --�T-__� - y"'. -__7 —_' - __I_J_.__. ( , I _. -
L
,r-i. -,.
mob.— i° �I ?�
- / �__ j \ III ti I • �.._._
r— 1 C t /` �.: : r L �' 1--- : �l--- r
1 -,,,„/,'1/,„,://,''/'--,-).4',7[ r J X I i ■■ --
J `y {r:_1(----T1 11,E X X11 i!.!. •a �r I ) !__
i..t.._.�{.- ..;'~,; ._ __. 1, ' l - , -a.:.: 1l.[_',.. , 1 HE--k----t-„,:--:--.:t i- ,,il,AV,'
Iti •,I _.J 'I-I—r' ._. 1-.. . j 1 -_..-
f — W . W
— —, 1 r,r F E t. , / G r �.r ° i ' X dill 1,..1�'I , II ' i ' I. . _.. �� _
� i
-�`�E-'/ 1 . I'r f r °' X r,;l t' -k • rr I t 1„1- --i !����C .1— -- 1 I
_ _ \ p'77` 11 ' `lJ`�(L �F y'I r
' ' ' L/I /-6,-,7 T - m N� .146 lal Y/ Ili , /!�+-l_�•_- I ! ���,\' l 1 I 1 ' _. - .. .. ....
1x1,1
`�/ - M
..1 I F! L r 1}t•_-=l rI,A L'., rI' 1 (i.LI, ...'�1..,,} ,(Iv 1, .' _—_r �L( �”„�� � -1 ..,.; _ I _
it= : - .- � r--._ d el'', t Fill - -,
__
IQ ,..I 4 1 , I � ,,te
Es--;' 1 i T (:' f ---1 1 i I r �a'4 rl1 PrM $(a }��i ( i --t 1 I �� ..
4
�.� _ ;TC� I _ • �� ,; ��,� �' h I � i Ea le Rci 1 7N -- 1 _ I
1st.
,r-= �Ar � ly` z+,',�mi �``I��. IFS '."n y �� Il � 1f t,X _ I _i'0 Li,
1
- t S a1. P 1 $
p kr� I I� 1_ J
rl ,� �rI m t I )
is �� -�� _
a xss r m t
�T.._ -- v t �<y ._�Ia -MI',x+'�:I? ry d 1 1 �j 1y 1,
„xa' -r--t 1 1 f t• ! r y- " „ 'III, At' ; w 1 _ X iir 1,2 •''-'� ,,• , t ' '�Sao :;1;',',1:::;.4,,!,',,',,.,;,,I� ts '.p✓ 1 �V \� + / 9 .-.. I I
r,1 ���Y,`
Lr ? f ,r. yS?r (ti i'n X �, E - .�,—Sas'.;' ("'-, i 1 F I ! I
um- 4 �. E �, r:
--ice- r JY fl,,,r �„,p 1 , " , �0eia" __7 J'>! a�i -d'
d 'I"X 4�'sr ^a^.. i __sls!! '_ - 4,` 1 .1 r 1 .�'.. _ ... .... _1--
I •• ,it � � 'P ii IMP y , .'.'' ii ,;.r ,y44,7:1-? •.r� -I •1„,. 4.$1.1:1..E141 . '- - 1} -.1 /. ' 7�..L• 1., , . ■.v• i 1 1 , ,1 •:;„1 ,,, ,, • , i j—r y�� t
,7- �^ i,,,, E ,?IR [ p �., Xf'. it „ ,, .tit,]* „jr� , �._1. .. . ,- _ /I i--__,..1,..`6 f ! / •
1{ . 7
�. ,X. _...,. a^dlya�r .. -1 .'; . , .'3Q . a.L .__ r+� // ,d :` S, • L itY �r� Y-
g Pr q 'drat &.' 1 '. ,, ,H p�r � � yp•
. b' '-"'b'-'b r-li:•';
,ij „Nils—,r : r �• "1 yl;h r P" �h��"�� �"� � �t "'�� *� U I4 •ZD� �.' 1, ��/� \r ��1 ♦ ti r I p"�i' ' , ! y 7" r t !'-.. I r � I 1 >•r I1 — " ` '�' r � ' 'f , wd - , ��1 u 1
or-1J '' � 0 1 I !I , I .,,N, � ffiN I I:r—r5
���" ' " 1'ti•��� �- .�� .jV ' 7" ♦ ��Ky 1� ii���'
i ?
JI _, .-s, i---
1 I I'�� 11 �'.-rr /`i �"-'. 1,.', i_. .. r y., p■ , �p `�i� 1.., r'' 1 r L,.� /� 'i/ �IrA,, I_ 1 11 _ (.-:-_-,:__.
.�X. �,� .....1 T.-
,-- �C ��. \)(�1 r, nr�ai. , 11,, 1 , X ,, w !' ,,ail.,,,,,i,, ,....4.
, , , , i_____/ -74/.. " -
--7___ 41-(Sk.)7 4004 )it,____,----I --''+*4“ AL-41-1 v r
,.....).g.:„ ,i, ,, . !-- _. 1 _.:
— C.�— try , _ ��—[`��I1�` +N,.-
:,_
-.. ; : , :, 'ri,„VI ,-,' 7' „ye/ fr, . iiL,, ,.,_ ---
, . , „.. ,,,' -•••11--1-7--i- r-., /, ---_-;., ini,-----4-1-11"-i ' 1 i
`r`/-`'h`'•` , "C /kF1�r$-Z.'•� r� .p,w- I I—f --L_r-_ii_ --.� _.2_ 4�
v > t 1
;.� \
• 1 �, f 1 i f
M -T
____
- i.
,..d ..' . 1. n
` '.. .' ti'- 171 7c a /' I i
µµt ,1,11, r' -I/
r
q
'gill m .,z > _ g 1 L7
o
..:,Pb et ; o OC R!b
$iir � � ; .9I fib' t a Er. E. HIli et-
k.;
0 b4 4 5 ' E.
a
O ppppp j R qq��W.
1 / 5 `
3:,-
g�i. t��. 1,2 R a '0 r, $E S'i k9 ''.' I Q /�j.�y' F�:.:!11 �.n1
,Pi al°' r 8 g 9 IK SLR i .., '`"'
B. Build Out Projections
Future residential development projections forecast the new residential development
that will take place in the study area beyond existing residential development from
the present time to build out
A build out analysis was completed by the APA to determine build out scenarios
for the Treasure Valley region. Contained in the analysis was a build out scenario
for the City of Eagle. The APA worked with the following assumptions in order
to derive the build out numbers for the City of Eagle:
• Developable Land
This was considered to be all parcels not subdivided within the Area of
Impact.
• Flood Plain Constrained Land
Parcels within the flood plain are not considered to be developable.
Therefore, the amount of land within the Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ)
which was in the flood plain was subtracted from the amount of
developable land.
• Land Use Densities
The Eagle Comprehensive Plan adopted densities for each land use
designation. To determine the population at build out the APA applied
the adopted residential densities to 70% of the developable land within
the TAZ (70% was used because that percentage was consistent with the
development trends in the City of Eagle).
The density factors are as follows:
LAND USE DESIGNATION VACANT BUILD OUT
DENSITY FACTOR
Rural Transitional 1 du/5 ac
Very Low Density 1 du/2 ac
Low Density Residential 2 du/ac
Medium Density Residential 4 du/ac
Mixed Use 20 du/ac*
Source: City of Eagle 1997 Comprehensive.Plan, Adopted 10-14-97
*Residential Dwelling Units not to exceed 20 dwelling units per acre.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 10
According to the APA Treasure Valley Partnership Build Out Scenario,at build out
there will be 14,985 dwelling units within the City of Eagle's area of impact.
Applying a population generation rate of 2.54, it was determined that the
population at build out will be 38,062 people. As demonstrated in the table below.
BUILD OUT RESIDENTIAL PROJECTIONS
BUILD OUT BUILD OUT
DWELLING UNITS POPULATION
14,985 38,062
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 11
PARK FACILITIES
I. INTRODUCTION
The park facilities analysis includes a review of the existing, proposed and future park
facilities within the Area of Impact for the City of Eagle. The park facilities analysis is
based on the need for land which provides active and passive recreational opportunities for
local residents. These areas offer baseball/softball diamonds, soccer fields, playground
equipment, group picnic shelters, and other active and passive recreational facilities.
II. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD
The level of service standard used to ensure that adequate park facilities are provided in
the City of Eagle is 3.3 acres per 1,000 population. This level of service is based on a
desire by the City of Eagle to provide a variety of park types.
III. PARK FACILITIES ANALYSIS
A. Existing Facilities Analysis
The existing park facilities analysis is comprised of two sections; the existing park
inventory and the existing level of adequacy.
1. Existing Inventory
The existing park facilities inventory provides the acreage of each existing
usable park and any land acquired to be used for park facilities.
The inventory of existing usable parks is provided in the table below.
•
Name Location Acreage
Friendship Park Calabasas Street 1.33
Arboretum Park Adjacent to City Hall 0.50
Jessica Aschenbrenner Roadside Hwy 44 at Old Valley Road 0.50
Park
Plaza Street Park Eagle Rd & Plaza Street 0.25
Orval Krasen Park Steirman Way 1.00
Heritage Park 2nd & State Street 0.50
Total Acreage �08
Source:Comprehensive Plan Update,City of Eagle Idaho,9-18-1998 pg.9-2. Confirmation by Mark Butler,City of Eagle.
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 12
As shown in the table above there is a total of 4.08 acres of park land
available to the residents of the City of Eagle.
Land already acquired and designated to be used for park facilities must
also be considered as a part of the existing inventory. The acquisition costs
for this area will not be included in the future costs to be paid by the impact
fee. The following table provides the inventory of land acquired for future
parks:
...... ..... ...................... ... . .. ..
Name Location • Acreage
Hill Road Park Hill Road 10.00
Merrill Community Park Boise River% East of Eagle Rd. 9.00*
Total Acreage 19.00
The acreage for this park may increase to 21.00 acres once the endowment from the Merrill family has been made.
Source:Field Check done by HPA&City of Eagle Officials
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 13
I
Homer Road
7
I
1
Beacon Li•ht Road —
v
co
W \
o
cz m /
c w `
J
Floating Fe= her Road —t
Jessica oFrie 'opii hi
Aschenbrenner 66erval Kr. - Hill Road AI
W.,#1- - ` • •
State Hwy 44 U : 'r'!.; -
' ► 'II
\• w
State sir \
Chinden Road
City of Eagle
, _
_
W T E
Park Location Ma p S
No Scale
Prepared by Hofman Planning Associates
May 1999
2. Existing Level of Adequacy
With a current population of 10,625 people, the required park acreage
needed to satisfy the existing park demand totals 35.06 acres. The
demand is calculated as follows:
Existing Population x Level of Service = Existing Park Demand
10,625 Population x 3.3 Acres/1,000 Pop. = 35.06 Acres
Based on the existing demand for 35.06 acres of park facilities and the
existing inventory of 4.08 total acres, there is an overall deficiency of
30.98 acres of park land. Therefore, there is a current need for the
development of additional park land. The deficiency of park acreage is
calculated as follows:
Existing Park Acreage - Current Demand = Park Acreage Deficiency
4.08 Acres - 35.06 Acres = -30.98 Acres
B. Build Out Requirements
Based on a level of service standard identified for park facilities and a build out
population of 38,062 people, a total of 125.60 acres of park facilities will be
needed to serve the build out population. Build out demand is calculated
similarly to existing demand.
Build Out Population x Level of Service = Build Out Park Demand
38,062 Population x 3.3 Acres/1,000 Pop. = 125.60 Acres
Since there are currently 4.08 total acres of park land, there is a future demand
for an additional 121.52 acres of park land.
Build Out Demand - Existing Park Acreage = Future Demand
125.61 Acres - 4.08 Acres = 121.52 Acres
Since there is a deficiency of 30.98 acres, this deficiency must be corrected
using funding sources other than impact fees. The 30.98 acres must be
subtracted from the future demand 121.52 acres which results in a remaining
90.54 acres to be provided by future development via the impact fee.
All future park locations will be determined at the time when demand creates a
need for additional park facilities.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 15
IV. PARK FACILITIES FINANCING
Park facilities will be provided to the residents of the City of Eagle as the need arises
and when funding is available. The city currently has a deficiency of 30.98 acres of
park facilities. The city is committed to correcting this deficiency.
Funding for park facilities must be obtained now in order to provide adequate park
facilities in the future. The primary source of the funding for future park facilities will
be through the collection of impact fees for park facilities. The following is the
methodology used to determine the park impact fee.
The cost per acre to develop future parks depends on the type of park constructed.
Mini-parks are small with few amenities and are typically passive in nature.
Neighborhood parks generally provide more amenities and active facilities and
therefore have greater development costs per acre. Community parks provide such
amenities as lighted ball fields, restroom facilities and other active facilities beyond
those provided by the neighborhood parks. As such, the cost per acre for the
development of community parks is greater than that of neighborhood parks.
For the purpose of this study, an average cost per acre for the construction of park
facilities is $40,000 per acre. In addition to the construction costs, the costs for park
land acquisition must also be considered. The cost for acquiring park land can also be
quite varied depending on the location. For the purpose of this study, an average cost
of$25,000 per acre for park land is used to calculate park acquisition costs. The total
development cost (construction costs + acquisition costs) for park facilities is assumed
as follows:
Construction Cost/Acre + Acquisition Cost/Acre = Total Cost/Acre
$40,000/Acre + $25,000/Acre = $65,000/Acre
A. Facility Costs To Meet Existing Demand
As expressed previously, there is a deficiency in park acreage. Therefore, there
are additional costs necessary to meet the existing demand for park facilities.
Based on the assumptions provided for acquisition and construction of park
facilities, the cost to correct the existing deficiency is $1,538,823.89. This cost
assumes both the construction of 30.98 acres at a cost of$40,000 per acre and
the acquisition of 11.98 acres at a cost of$25,000 per acre.
Construction Cost/Acre x Construction Deficiency Acreage = Construction Deficiency Cost
$40,000/Acre x 30.98 Acres = $1,239,276.24
Acquisition Cost/Acre x Acquisition Deficiency Acreage = Acquisition Deficiency Cost
$25,000/Acre x 11.98 Acres = $299,547.65
Construction Deficiency Cost + Acquisition Deficiency Cost = Total Deficiency Cost
$1,239,276.24 + $299,547.65 = $1,538,823.89
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 16
There is currently $315,000 appropriated for the construction of park facilities
at the future Ada County Sports Complex to be built on approximately 85 acres
just north of Floating Feather Road in the eastern outskirts of the area of impact.
With the allocation of these funds, the city is making the required commitment
to correct the existing deficiency.
B. Facility Costs To Meet Build Out Demand
In order to meet the build out demand for park facilities, an additional 121.52
acres of park facilities will need to be constructed. As specified previously,
there is a deficiency that must be corrected. The correction of this deficiency
will be subtracted from the future park facilities needed to meet build out
demand. Since the deficiency is 30.98 acres, the remaining acres to be financed
by the impact fee will be 90.54 acres.
Future Demand - Deficiency = Future Demand Financed by Impact Fees
121.52 Acres - 30.98 Acres = 90.54 Acres
The cost for construction of future park facilities varies depending on the type of
park needed. Based on the construction costs provided previously, the cost to
construct 90.54 acres of park land is assumed to be $3,621,694.56.
There will also be a future need to acquire an additional 90.54 acres. At the
rate of$25,000 per acre, the cost for acquisition will be $2,263,559.10.
With the assumptions provided above, the following calculations are used to
determine the total cost for the development of future park facilities needed to
meet build out demand:
Future Park Construction Demand x Construction Cost/Acre = Future Construction Cost
90.54 acres x $40,000/acre = $3,621,694.56
Future Park Acquisition Demand x Acquisition Cost/Acre = Future Acquisition Cost
90.54 acres x $25,000/acre = $2,263,559.10
Future Construction Cost + Future Acquisition Cost = Future Park Cost
$3,621,694.56 + $2,263,559.10 = $5,885,253.66
Based on the above assumptions and calculations, $5,885,253.66 is the amount
needed to pay for future park facilities in order to meet build out demand.
Additionally, the Development Impact Fee Act (Section 67-8208.(1)) contains a
provision which allows for the impact fee to pay for the preparation of the
supporting documents implementing the collection of impact fees. The total cost
for the preparation of the development impact fee supporting documents is
$18,500. One-half of this cost is included in the park impact fee and the
remaining one-half is included in the pathway impact fee. Therefore, the impact
fee will be based on a total amount of$5,894,503.66.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 17
C. Fee Calculation
The impact fee calculation is a simple process. The fee will be paid only by
future residential development. Therefore, by dividing the cost for future park
facilities of$5,894,503.66 by 10,802 future dwelling units, the park facilities
impact fee is $545.69 per dwelling unit. The fee calculation methodology for
park facilities is shown on Table 2 on page 19.
D. Optional Financing Mechanisms
The following is a list of optional financing mechanisms that can be used to
finance park facilities. Each of these mechanisms is described in more detail in
the Financing Options chapter, beginning on page 36.
► General Taxes
► State-Shared Revenues
► Local Bonds
► Impact Fees
► Special District
► Federal Payment In-Lieu of Taxes Funds
► Community Development Block Grants
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 18
Table 2
Park Facilities Fee Calculation
Future Facility Cost (1) = $5,894,503.66
Future Facility Cost $5,894,503.66
- Other Funding Sources - $0.00
Future Development's Total Cost $5,894,503.66
Future Development's / Projected = Fee/DU
Total Cost Dwelling Units
$5,894,503.66 / 10,802 = $545.69
Cost per Dwelling Unit = $545.69
NOTES:
(1) Future Facility Costs are based on the need to acquire and construct
a total of 90.54 acres of park acreage to meet future resident demand.
Acquisition and construction cost is assumed to be$65,000 per acre.
May 11, 1999
PATHWAY FACILITIES
INTRODUCTION
The pathway facilities analysis also includes a review of the existing, proposed and
future pathway facilities within the Area of Impact for the City of Eagle. The pathway
facilities analysis is based on the need to provide adequate pathways for local residents.
In addition to the recreational opportunities created, the pathways will also provide
alternative routes for traveling from one place to another.
II. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD
The level of service standard used to ensure that adequate pathways are provided in the
City of Eagle is 4,670 linear feet per 1,000 population. This level of service is based
on the lengths of the pathways shown in the existing City of Eagle Comprehensive
Plan. This level of service along with the assumptions provided in this chapter will
ultimately achieve construction of all trails identified in the existing Comprehensive
Plan.
III. PATHWAY FACILITIES ANALYSIS
A. Existing Facilities Analysis
The existing path analysis contains two sections; the existing pathways inventory
and the existing level of adequacy.
1. Existing Inventory
The existing usable pathway is provided as the total length of all existing
public pathways within the area of impact. Presently, there is a total of
25,9502 linear feet of pathways. These pathways are a combination of
both gravel trails and asphalt paths.
2. Existing Level of Adequacy
With a current population of 10,625 people, there is a current demand
for pathways of 49,615.96 linear feet. The demand is calculated as
follows:
Existing Population x Level of Service = Existing Pathway Demand
10,625 Population x 4,670 LF/ 1,000 Pop. = 49,615.96 Linear Feet
Based on the existing demand for 49,615.96 linear feet of pathway
facilities and the existing inventory of 25,950 linear feet, there is a
deficiency of 23,665.96 linear feet of pathways. Therefore, there is a
2 Existing pathway access easement information provided by Mark Butler, City of Eagle
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 20
current need for the development of additional pathways in order to meet
the current den}and. The deficiency of pathways is calculated as follows:
Existing Pathways - Current Demand = Pathway Length Deficiency
25,950 Linear Feet - 49,615.96 Linear Feet = <23,665.96 Linear Feet>
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 21
- -1,- ----.77--"T-1111_11--7A — - , _ -----7- —
,
-.1--
•• i •:; ..---.
/__I.--:!....-,' ,,.7 - - ' I 1 ,--1% 1 ,
i _ .
' ;, i 'll -7--- 4' ----
i \4"%i7,--1-- .l.l./.- t .444 li4l ;., •
— e___--7 .L.. 't '''''''''...,..'` PI - --v. , . , , ,,
. ,
.
2,-1
.\i 5,. •
, I: it V
. .
.
i! ...?..%.':V. '-' ir_i( , ,,::..k ., 7-----...„ . , . ,. •
1
,..., mi-v.„,,,.,„:. \.
, :: ., i ..- ________E. ...I, ,
--------,--c \''.-4-
I I ■ -- .' ,‘
1 / .1., • •
I !---1_____' — ,.„ ;1_ ) i " ;
tj ___, L--_1 '
-.' , . --, -J
\ i i.
) '1 l' . .', I
1-
1 ----
,
■
! ,
i ! ;
.1
I
L___(1 . I i 1 ' I? 'UM V.-' . .. ,
. . . ... '
,
.
- :- — . I
.... _ '
I ''. =I ' '' '''
'-',.. i ' ‘ _ ..
\ .
. r-1-7---
• .
ri-TTJ 1:_ -_1- _s' (
) .
7 , - • _ I
,,... 1 •
-,
Linder 'd
1 .:
1 _ -
.._ .
_ •
_ _
..,,
tt ., 1 _... ,. \
t.
- --- I -3 • / ( k •• \ i I . / i ■ k 1 I. , • _ , 1-i. .
- - ,. .,_,L,L,„ _ _
. I — 1---
111 I \ r L •
I g o
1 L., , 1 _
.. /,), . •
., , _...,
Ilioi
,
-1 . (-)--7F I --- 1 1--h --.1---L--- '1- , '11- i •
-E •
I
1 ;
\'(--
I " III L_ i 1 .s._ __•.__L__ • ". _ -
as ,
-
,----H- ,:' s\N 1 1 1 --1....___,....i, :,-...,-,. -•-.:1 _ —_,.._? I I - _
.• .
. ,....„, ,.
' ' `,.--.-------- , ,t-t•
-
/S:1 ••
r_LL.,... ..?...? ri ........1;,__ L I i , , . —Th., ,\; ,.1 • , 1 _
i • ir-/ . . ---'---1
• ,...‘‘ ' , I _____,
1 t
I,
11
I
, . , , __,
i L . i 4, ::•4 ',
t_ ___ ___, _____
V :_ ,.._ .__---, •
......_r_.. „ __________„.. __.,_.,..______,
I li ...' 'I -'•'• 1 I ' ,.. , .,,,; A I, . , 1 ■
I 1- r .
-
. -;----q-- - --' I B -A:3 n .. c.;,,, ... ., [ i, _ 1 Li --11 1 i 1 . LT , 1- 1 11— I 1,
•■
• _____I.../I t . .-- ,t
. 1 0 ri )i . ‘-,- ---------1\-----
, 1
f .--1 -FP-- A _-, „..>A,-//.
:(f)___A--- 1
__LI ii f3)
r+
,,••••'• /,',.-74
....- ,. , ..'
I
--6---1
d., •,-
—71V---f .-'71---- i., ,
--..:....." ,. -
i..t.,-- / ' a I ; 1 . , 1
.v.....
i'' I
i
L 1 1 1 f---7 i -,,,,,
. . _ • ,, - , , I-- • I /,......../.___,4
.
.r 1 -,..1.... i -----
, i '''..4,1.S.■.' 1 - -Q----- . 'n I ., -..
, --
t ._...._. , li 1 . CD ---- 1
d- . ----7 ,. / ____11
, ... ,
hinpa i
. _ ...._ __ ..._____ _ . _ _
\ , 1, 7" = I 1 ,. I
JL- 1 ,,-- ; ,
CD ,.! f•,. i' ----
. \•,=',I 4-----)1 •01 ,'•.4; 1 \ .,.....:„....„....--- ''y '; --, .1
. . • s `•!1='---- --
21\- -,L-44; / _ I '. .. a \ /..e . / , . . , V"----7,,,
,
. _
-- t---C1 .,, .:'. \ .1 ,r,,, . r ), . X-1.--r-n- i
i C4\e' 1111 /1 > i t ---(......
,._i ., -=--(i.
\ / r -v--,•'' ,------X /
_i ---ii 1 -1......,i : ___ --r■■•■■■■ 4.; ii________':,. , ,........__, . -..., s. z \ ..
\ ii.„-----T7-1 1 --:, „
, 1
_____
_ ii, tril I I -.; li
. ____I;
. ,,,,, ,
_.?:,?,4I-.1 --- L-_- --__,..n..----7-4,) -",
— ..,
_ ') _I -, r,V. 1 - '_if— ' - ,,,,,-41, ,i• \•,.---,-
___\ .- 1 \
-7---- - - -.• ...• -
A •-", -- 4 :^'' .- 1 i
.., . ,7 1 I 1------I
,
en , .
1___T I L_-,,)4•=4-
•
„.,,,- : (—ii---71 //,- i
:
a I :al lantyne RdF
....
. •. .::-...,..: 1. , .
17,
1 . //
r f if''.
/.. . 1 \ , 8 ii. rpil 1 - :
-i ....: e,;,:; ,.. :- ,
i •
, 10' .'—_________:_,',, , ..'
l ' ' . In
Imo
1 ' L
'
1-4.11,0 I
/ / ' .. .7 t. , '. . ..,''Ilir•
--___ •'. - \ I ' • 111 -----s , --1
...,j___ NEI • ,' i 71
_
, / ... • ,______
'N''..- '-,r-r,'-".
_...
e / '; \ I ' _i -. ;;,,...:, ;;• ;.•
• . ,;:, I ; . ___.
Ell 1 1 / i_ ' 1_ 2 -- _. ,,_____ ,.
, '-, ...."-- .
,;j
'-7/
. — .....-.... . •
. .LITjan::) t••!.. l / '
„.., ,.. I.,.,. ,.,„ ..... , . . i
, go...J.1. m •
i ---1 h. 1--, __, .was P' ,..---" I."- ' ■-.— __
.. ... . :
.
t 43, ks•.1 _ _
'1 '•
I •
•_
111 no\ 111.1112:
1 —LAI
1 , ...,.. . = t
....2 ,,,,....,),..... --.. - 1
E..... •
j--i-...•,‘. '),e-\ -- ..,-1 . -.,, „ .
.,-.. tit( i in -, 7, . ,... -..6,----afr. ,
, •71_,GEit".tri ti.1 , -,--,:'4 ..'',- c,-
ar \ /t....,..... i \IC F ___[. 1
c '.,› NE :
4 t,•-__ -- 't ' 2 - -I- ei.,...m. n.77\
..q 14- -$'11__ j t ')---- f?' ''—
__ __ ,4,7,-•-r•11:::4 ---I .• '
i — —,i.. --.
---------\ , •.:''•: CV•E1.-:c-
-X':. *J I
-.
I
i; 1 'BFf i I ; 1
LI
i.,.,.7). ........„ 7/...,.,
' 1- ... ...,
-.(% ./,---/ - 7- ' . ... ;:t ,;; ti' 4-j, .•; 7,1 . ,•s://*-7,.. ..I.L. , ." , ..,7: 1 / : /..-4 1 I 1 r __-L-- i ......„../ , 1 1 r....
(4-, t.,. ,4
; ..,• , _, V: '
1 L t - -" 1 .. f"""--',..___tr.._,,,.Thi,,' itt.,.._,'- ar7r,-.• , 71,i,„:,.._.,:, [ ,,.._'-f-'-'-•‘•1•&,"":::2,`• - _
I 6:--• Ea.le Rd 1-iNqPi 'Eli '
,../ '---1 • -I
.1_].?...__. , , .„., i ,
, ,, . ..-,,.„ ,,, , / :I Ly. ,../1-1-%1 LI (1\dilk--1)' 1-,-,I'll -1) 1, 1 I -1 4. _ ■ .,....._ 1,.L.,:__ .--- • — ---'----1/ 1 --i-
L1 r., 1 tCr--- 73 . --- -t] r'
,-;- •-, , -- I _. , ... - 3 irrii ,..n I„:,--,.:(1q, _ 'i rf-3',0 ....,_',<.,,,,,. VIM_ a , , "7. 1 1 ILJ' ,,,,.,
__ L
: I'" ' '1 .".-1- ' ':%" I 0 ;AT iiri,,.„- . '''-i-' •rzt.M : I .. 1--',I 1. • , ,1.... .
•
1,-1-----
_, . „„P--,'_ : '-'2 ' '-.
..-- 'Z'l IX ' 7 \C w
,•-•-•( 1: 9 44 /
)- j-i - 1- I I 1 ---_ j 17)r
1
,--- ''>N iftl'Il`"--7-dt-'--4-1'IV' j .I ' !-F-.-•,r-r,
• -,,,--..._.3 _L..,_
/7 / / -...,„, .7:9.:P:4..---, . i /,' ../ , II .11A1
'' 1 n.-/I 1 .-'-- ".^,.,'''.'''''...'.:' ' -
'.'' '111-- /I 1 -1-,-...-.- -' -:r
0 1.--..
j I . .
W.'... .0 1 ----a , ,,, ,..,,. ..-._:.?... _ ____.,_ --I .i/ r.-1 ,..-,\- -...?.-L-..,-;.-->--‹--:-A : =
.... i } / ' . I ,
.... Ii:I.; ..4-, '.51 ;'1.'1-;: . -it i - . ••Z I I ',-.-r, •llI ..l,.,.r4 .....c.::;:::::?•.: 5..=; ,
...
: .
- ' —1' I .171
PAMQ --/,' • ' I "-.,
2 .,.--•',' - ;'' \ -..t.T-- ,. \ , ; i 1 1-t_ , -t-4-:,"-- ;-<4...e--''-•
■ I. ,,, , -,.. -1"../ i,;„., ..,./..,,, • .ir---\.,•,___,I, 1.2 • .r- h
Pi•':71"l -rv-i; 1 ,. 1 ;;;' /; / '•;; :/ /C+.50' D--,T>• '• ', . 1 , -r- - ' itits . 'f. .:-: .-----------L •-:-.--'-1----
-- - ' l''''
g.-...i ' ',.•.----;-v.I :.1 I iii-T- ';-r-R_-, _1„,,,,,f1,9'..4, ‘ " =-. 1
--c-, . . -"i / . 4 i i__ _ ..;.: ..- _ -' . ----1 L ___
- I -r-
t- -_,/ 1 ,
1-s\k- . .
, i
i ' •-.--• ',,' ,,' ' ' ..' ' /I I jL____1"71,,Alt .<\-1:%k-•
/ . ,.. , ''•• \ a; ___ i 0 j _r,
i, .1t-- . LT.. l,-,-.Cr--z-,-/I• ,---';( • d
,-,. •iii,,,,.. sie, 4 -,•••:-.., _. . c ji
, ,_ ..
.
. 1 ../
• 5 •
\\ / 3 li' , • I I / ''''''.•..: 7 "-4,-. .-, ---,sr-air 'r--- i l• J1-1,
,.,-jr,L_,, , \ ,i- I '' r--41-4- ----,-••9 ''''',.-
") i 7 ___1/if , -- • . .: I / r.,,,..-zo- „-i,...ti.90,4-ir,... f; ri,- .,
---,-
•‘ ,1__
---
4__, I-..,,r / ::•, t -7--, -..1 L.:\ qg-i.y.,. .,.:13,1,0g4zi-N.itEl t.-_ a .,i-------7 . 1 1 I
AL...
.
. \I ,. : ,, . , , . •— i,• ...:,•,. _...4 ...4,,..,.„,:,,,Iff-e,, . p7.3.,.•'. , -I „\\._ f tr , I `,--'■ / -cs•-1
.. /,'• ,/'4. I '
. I/ .."....'*-14- .---71 .--4414L"...15,) — ...E,_._.;.__L. ____I--___i_l ...-,rf I _,7 '
1 _. \s 0'''II.,..,.•.i , ., i i/ ..,-s.,<-..::_-.-5.:_5__ ,-ti<41C-'-'=-,r'f? P•54 ..._ , ;
. • ,
i 2,7 ,--- ..., r .1',',....`
.' 1, .L -..-:—.:- ____< Ne, ,.,4it• . , E '''', Edgewood IA5. [ \.
&Is;-- -. fir
....9 , .. . i -0- _._.0 - T . .<,.„........ ,
' ..'",'-i r-, Ti-JL-1 _II i..__7', il_L----11.
._./ ,. • . 4
t
--- ------- ;"'r'' -- -•t•- , :. -• Will .".'v; _ ig„ • ,..7 ... ; , -1..„ ,..y-, :,2
' .:,' I l'r /,)1 il *L• -- ,v--- s'r< . . -‘----;,,,,-.?-7--- -1-"it7-;,/c7: 1_1_ ---,-- . ,,,%'''''''''',./ :11----: 1
, A 1 4.,,i, -,,... ,.-EL-,,,., ,,,,,4 :-.„: 4 -0...,,- -5--0-,,,,-6i 1 - /- k --ii --7
,._.,
;.; , ,, ., ....,,,,, . , .....,_. __,------ . .- ?:_. , .:- , -,--,...,_
> ,...... - - ..i
. . ..... .
. ,,,,..,. . \..,...,„.. .. - ,_---rr'. '....-T1--"-• . -- . „.,( ,-\,, i 7 ,L .
iitz. f. ,.'I- -------1-.'''l •
.^ Iffitv .,.4i 1---I, ,,,.,.,<„,r_7 1-I--,.7-_:„.,;;.4A-...hir• , ,_.: :-.',...:-..) •1,..//..... 61 -,,,,,, :t,.. ..e.,..„--, 1.2...,,,,>,,Q73,. - ,
'. .. lei -'1'1V.-`-rAtY71I-Ir-11-,/ ":. ii '-' './ 11'"-M--t• \ i - I ,----
-'I-4g i' 441' II. IS."'•,-.1.--11-,',e1-4/1).(/`-r7,F'.-- ",-.4-.-51-;: I T ---D I I
.. ,
.)._
I.• '/!--- I '71- - .i7/0-''\.-',\- ,
:Z.I.:.;Sir-"---,..it-rE4 ...c.,- . 4_. -..,r41„--_ -..„..i.,-..,--,,•..-,, ,i;..-cr--;
--. -' ,- I ■
:t-='=42.1-7---— t-1"--''';',":=1:"../..r!-.1-tql14-::::; .•;:i_.,_, ,
•••.. .4 ,4 ...', --s . --,,......--- . i 5
■ - .'6)/ri'' IL-____,_. :I ,.,_ ---'"4- '' VERSiii Ilt1 . .)\'; ''''(... /.-?Cr'''i(' --?( .„. \r-
I i
.i... 1. ....q.;',A ,.,, .' .... ____ 1 ' •.:171-71-: I I _ll 1- ' '' (.3 •7'.X-(7 -1-,31(:,Y., _._'2.-_'_•-:._ L--_--.'-- - __ __ -
--; --r---
..4!..., ._,_:.Ii1e"lizr,'"."4:::....Zii .. 4). ._< N- i 4,\ [ 1 li 1-1
. , /
., /
L________ 4,
.-----i i ,W4%
6-‘4--f,4•'.--t". --L.-,
...---v‹ - \ 1 ----< s ---f - -, .2
-1-1 iri -1, -4 47-1 - 1 -•
'.' • L..4 ---_::::-.--; . - '--(4,VS . .
t . A33,, .
P., .ff-4,0 -.-'1-...l•'-''Fc ..;.1.-rtvIli P'l'r
i
- Lk,, ,u 1 il
1 , ,,.,„ _. . __, .-- ; ) \ . i
' 'IPCkriEli9 1
..t___. -11-1- II • -..A , 1-.. ' ' ,. , , t'LL.Ttna_ ,-,-- • -", r,..,t. r IA , 1 - ,--" --;••----2-177- .:,---1\ ---
. :
it i ..., ,....„.i.,,,,,..,,..,' f- _.., _ : Cr * * II ' .L. i I. Ill 11,,
It• • j.".1.
. .... .
1. 4441 I :01'.7.111 -(4.R..,:111.1.5;)-.IA:TIV'4,,,:C';..,(Ir■iII.I1"1.°. 1111.111°1"---. 4
I ,
''' I ) / ',' '•
7 )s.
,/ / .,,,. . .): rivt-:,,,,,i.„_.: IL_,„,.„ ,.___ ...,-, ,i , )
, ,,,,-- , - -
, .
( .„ t, . , .., 4.;• ••. PS.'tir,,,,t
.'":,/'17_,L.
i .:• : (-T..-' ' : -- 11.4:11 as. 1 " ' -_-:F.: fffEl r•--.4 --\I -- - ,-.• ,." :'•'''"., ,„ . ):,--'IL-----
/ --/ , >s--' ,•- ..-----',.
I : I ..,.-.....-. I /t... ___., _ V.,. 1',( , r,..,:
( / , _''7_: ' • i 3"...>;,-, ....‘ Li.t i
:au,63,•sskt.., . --. -I-,
:---,... • si--I
I/ ff' =-4 •
. . 6-...:-___ „...,?„4•-•••\-,\ `-:\ 1 -,
_I-
-- 9-. .•S --• - ; •
' _____
.4r=r_u'i)
, . ;
I .' \ ',- ; i • -----I , ; / ,,- _LIITIVEI 4-,.7---1 -- • ti.'
., ,.
. .
ii,',.7 ,•-"ij---fid -. 73.;_,-_--,_. I- -7 1 ii _______________ --- - - - --- ' -
„/ .4- q 'C--s- -7----= ,74,--•-' ---r--,-- :, r ... ! t 1, •• , -----------1-
1 i .f.-.: ...,, 111,--0 ,---:, i :41/--•-• r.,4
. ,
,........
'' '''''' '/-'--A ”tr.(;.;4-4---4?-41;.. • '.LL _I' - - ; .
1 ' :..
4;11:11----. 1 "I'•/.:•;/- •2;•-• _,,• ;' )-..-1 //45'-I . ,-TAIR ..........
III Pi ' .-- :. .-----.-_,_..[____ ' ,
; 1 , 1,,
Abgt,-16'.1, _ ____.
ri-r-rrr''.- ----r-... --
7-Tr..', /) 1 T i 1 1 , 1 1 t __.____ ___,
. , il
.
,-... -1-....,!"...,ca• /3,,•'''''-.--•:-?--\---..,s..-4--c44:J/-1 u y_11" .;-1----1 , LI ', : 1 1 . i; " - ; - _1
,1
;
.;_:-_E-FT-i---7 IT Tr;Tr.---17- i -----r-------------------:------"--7 ____ 1 _ ,
1 1
• .
ifl------
R ___•1. •---.•-_.-:-.-,
.'.".4,...'•.,•12.4- ...Le. 1. •ri--1 rl, ••1;TI--.."; -It ll I . I I I i li i I I' Iir-----1'-
.u,
--
I )
I/ 1 1 1 I 1 r)
• 7 t. '.7 1 -it .-1111.,Pk;:ak!'''-'?34.31,1•-••!•.-% Li ---1 ---11---- ' I - 1
4 .---1 /
■;.• i •P4 Ab-f.'-'=-->•:•> <I'.\•'*35-•:-'. ,'
.e
— - --
' '47/ fki.41:7"--7:043 ,t.•-;'`Zoi'•• -•/----ii I r..--[ - " ----17.-,,, '.
•
:
CD •4
1 L:VZ.,-V.11...;",1:4102.:? -F./ I J l' - --Tri ' ' -----1.
. f.,-.o • ,,,,,.,.,_-,-_,),,ye.,,,n-I__:. ,,,,,,_ w 1 .__,. , - ----I
■
; t..=..'"4J-,-- -1- --_.--4-'• ----1---•----I------1-1---------------
, ..
g• 'D ..ste. -:-_ -' _______• .illq__1..-1- ' '1-^-2-"-Ll• • --- -
1-;:t l'E.‘.;
4.g:rs 0 a
i
/ad 0.4 0
11.,-i1L'• , -,
s ,-.._.
x 04 04 ,...,
s. ci)
t....,
1.,,..R ki,
Fst--e- f... R."
P P g, a P
z...
a:,i1• 8`4, i 4,,
Ct. CD c- >
',4'Fig^g °:,; --`' .
v.. .....--
r4 OZJ p.i... a
, E 0 ,... 4 [1,-;
i VI t• II 4d 43
lar■• :b 0 1-5 'CI W 06464
41 I a ,.;::,, ti7,,, .1,,, 8.
,...,,4 rE6 _-- . it
.
tit
. §h--n t.1 ---72,_-1-- ,7 ...i_e? (j) E•t• I CAI I...A t---•
tt'-41 .'(31 r•--i eo
1 -,,
i l'id
et, col
eft E. g
20
ti..tri. i 8
..,..N/
Eg
N aro
. 0...-
I ets E-Lz
K
L, TI m m m p C) co D D
(n CU CO O O ';03 CO 0) a) 7- CD . = a)
s � C C C p. (O (O to (D N (D N 3 En S O
. O N 3 * 0 0 N (D (D (D n 7 00 7 7
1
N cn a D cn n (7- (n ? o = m CD CD v O o O p (1)x m m CD o 0 s N N I` CO m n- cn . 73
CD 0 3 -n _0 ° .. o '-� p a) 0 �' Can Z o v C c c
o ° ngi m -0 73 0 0 7• = 5' n m m
o- 0 0. a) c 0) N N p c S p (D c Cn Cn
7• o o -" 7v N 5 5 :5 -1 o a) oc C
00 °O O 1D O< N N ly , N S ?
7- 7 7 a) .� `G ,< m' _ 7- 0)
(D �_ < (D - 7 0)
C to a a ) CD - (D 7-
-p .. = d<< v v = CO D 0)
O - P a)
CU 0 7 7 < -I ^ cn `G
-h O n < N
(D -tiO_ O KCD
(D CO ly ,y 0) I-
II X 7 CI
° (1) W 0 D D D D D m D p D C D 73
Ivv xr- 6 ^'
DJ -o -,I o 0 55i-555w o N 0 7 o a)
�. ^ ca__ -' c m n 7 n 7 5.1. 7 (n 7 Q 7 ?
O < D p (a Cn co cc ca CD 0 (n (D (n
N + -a 0 S 5 TI 5 -5 0 0 7 CO N r-f 0
O -' n ` (D tD f-' (D CD m ,z N CD CD CDD 0
O ° o v m
o o 0 CD 0 o ( -, v o 0 0
5 O Oh (D N = in = 5- = a) a 7 s 7
(D m ° cn _ cn u) cn cQ O_ u' r1
o (° 7 o a 0 o N m CA Cu * '"' D a /
m 111=1.
(n CD o O =3 O c) 7 0 f. o
IIIZ
CD m CO W a) W o °03 v v s
CO v, a
° o ° O a 7 7. a
0
D CO 7 N' Cl) °
5 CD O >
< r CO (D (D CD a) 0
X
OM rn
° N -J < < R. m c 7 _
(L] u) -,.. Cl) CD (-0D N (D 0) 0)
s 7 � z z - Cr) < CD
7
CO
(n Z CD O N CD o .�
Z m
t—D C ° C O a O C
N < ? S o 7 O V
N' C) '
n < D- D- (CD a)
-1 N 7 0) 0) u) CD 0
(D j o 7 7 N
fD CD 0. 0
(p CD CD
N 0 a) y
0
0. CD
5' (1) Q
co m- v
0
0 c
ID
CD =
Cr
o D
P
Cu -0 0)
ox x x x x x
a)
N
CT - at O H I I _sv 0)
x x x x I �!_ C c'
CD
cn
0 — I -
CD
O
,con -
N N -a N) N -a -a -a -.. � CD O
01 CJ) O 01 01 0 0 0 0 O CD �`
N
OD '' CO CO CO CO OJ fD
N N N N v < 0
_ CD
N CD 5. -
W W W W -• a) 01 r
.p W 01 u) U) W N CO CJ) 0 0) ) C aN -" o
�y A co CI -••..1 (A --sr O O co (D n N o
t)1 A N CO 01 CJ) 0 a) CO CO N (p CD `C
CD
0 0 CO C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O v EN
CD _ 0 0
0 _ '1 7 7 - a 0
O a) C _ --1. a) -, U t N co � (CD 1."F
CJ7 Q) a) CJ) O) O .A U) (p = aa) 'O ..
A A • .I CO A O CD CO CO O CDD p'< (CD �T
O -1 N 1.) -.I - O - co O O 7 ^V
• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O i�
0
"I_, N -, I 6 5.---- d Fic - =(1) CD
y -'1 CD CO L a) N --J CD a) N 3 < N
CO .A W O 0 ) in 0) .A (A �. 7 * O `•/
(V a) 0) a) --, O -� Co cm CD CD o CD
CD CO O) 03 -L. O CD O O N D ca.
s N) a n U a)
O W 6)
0 0 O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
(i) e-,
En En EA EA EA EA E) EA EA En -0
0 O C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T cn C
O O CJi O O 6 in in CJ) in '- "' CO
O O �I 0 O v -J � v v
� N .
o
O
EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA • 0 7
0 0 0 0 -1 m u, .N-'
W W G.I W W a) a) a) a) W • " C
OD co a) co CD CD CD CD CO CD C3 rt
N " o'
7
N
0
.4 o
N N EA Efi. C.,3 NJ N EA EA N N Cl)
op CD 01 W Co a) N Co CJ) O -,
CD CD CA N �l CD 0) CO 01 O N 0 C
�P N -� h� y CD - U) -co D b '-' ,n..
• CO N -4 CO O 0 Cr 0 lz. CD O N
7
N ---1 CD CO W CO O O W O ��
W . • CO O .A — Cn O J O N
B. Build Out Requirements
Based on the current City of Eagle Comprehensive Plan, the total length for all
existing and proposed future pathways is 268,397.50. This is the total length of
all pathways at build out.
Since there are currently 25,950 linear feet of pathways and the city is currently
planning for 268,397.50 linear feet of pathways at build out, there is a future
demand for an additional 242,447.5 linear feet of pathways to meet the build out
condition.
Build Out Length - Existing Length = Future Demand
268,397.50 LF - 25,950.00 LF = 242,447.50 LF
Of this future demand, certain portions of the future pathways will be
constructed by the developers of property located adjacent to identified pathway
segments. The pathway segments to be constructed by the developer will be a
requirement attached to the approval of a development project. The total
developer contribution is assumed to be 90,655.4 linear feet and the pathway
segments and lengths of contribution are identified on Table 3 on page 23.
After subtracting the deficiency of 23,665.96 linear feet for pathways that will
be funded by other sources and the developer contribution, the remaining
pathways to be financed by the impact fee totals 128,126.14 linear feet.
IV. PATHWAY FACILITIES FINANCING
Similar to park facilities, pathway facilities will be provided to the residents of the City
of Eagle as the need arises and when funding is available. The city currently has a
deficiency of 23,665.96 linear feet of pathway facilities. The city is committed to
correcting this deficiency as soon as additional funding becomes available.
Funding for future pathways must be obtained now in order to provide adequate
pathway facilities for the future residents. One source of funding for future pathway
facilities will be through the collection of impact fees. The following is the
methodology used to determine the pathway impact fee.
The cost to develop future pathways depends on the type of pathway constructed.
There are three types of future pathways proposed for the City of Eagle; 1) 8 feet of
paved asphalt with 10 feet of right-of-way, 2) 8 feet of gravel trail with 10 feet of right-
of-way and, 3) 12 feet of paved asphalt with 25 feet of right-of-way.
For the purpose of this study, a cost per square foot for the construction of pathway
facilities is assumed to be $1.38 for asphalt paved pathway and $0.69 for a gravel trail.
In addition to the construction costs, the costs for land acquisition must also be
considered. The cost for acquiring land for pathways is assumed to be similar to that
for park facilities at an average cost of$25,000 per acre or $0.57 per square foot. The
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 24
total development cost (construction costs + acquisition costs) for the 8-foot pathway
facilities is assumed as follows:
► 8-foot asphalt path within 10-foot right-of-way = $16.74 per Linear Foot
► 8-foot gravel trail within 10-foot right-of-way = $11.22 per Linear Foot
The pathways along the Boise River are proposed to be larger regional type pathways.
Due to the location of the pathways adjacent to the river, there are no acquisition costs.
This land is already publicly owned. Since the pathway is proposed to be asphalt paved
at 12 feet in width, the total cost for pathway development is assumed to be $1.38 per
square foot or $16.56 per linear foot.
A. Facility Costs To Meet Existing Demand
As demonstrated previously, there is a current deficiency in pathway facilities.
To correct this deficiency, the city will construct 23,665.96 linear feet of gravel
trails. The cost to correct this deficiency is assumed to be $265,532.10. This
amount will not be financed by the impact fee. Other funding sources must be
used to correct this deficiency.
B. Facility Costs To Meet Build Out Demand
In order to meet the build out demand for pathway facilities, an additional
242,447.50 linear feet of pathways must be constructed. As indicated
previously, 23,665.96 linear feet of gravel trails will be provided by the city to
correct the existing deficiency and 90,655.40 linear feet of pathways will be
provided by the developers for pathways shown on the Pathway Plan that cross
property that will be developed in the future. Based on the following
calculations, the cost to construct the remaining pathways is assumed to be
$2,463,414.74.
Future Pathway Distance - Developer Pathway Contribution = Revised Future Distance
242,447.5 LF - 90,655.40 LF = 151,792.10 LF
Revised Future Distance = Future Pathway Development Cost
151,792.10 LF = $2,728,946.84
Pathway Deficiency Distance = Pathway Deficiency Cost
23,665.96 LF = $265,532.10
Future Pathway Development Cost - Pathway Deficiency Cost = Pathways Cost After Deficiency
$2,728,946.84 - $265,532.10 = $2,463,414.74
The cost for pathways after the developer contribution and after the deficiency
correction is considered must be further adjusted. This additional adjustment
accounts for the cost to prepare the development impact fee study and capital
improvements plan and to include the consideration of other funding sources.
The total cost for the preparation of the development impact fee study and
supporting documents is $18,500. One-half of this cost ($9,250) is included in
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 25
the pathway impact fee and the remaining one-half is included in the park impact
fee. This amount is added to the $2,463,414.74. Any other funding sources
anticipated must be subtracted from this amount. At this time it is assumed that
80% of the cost to construct the four pathways adjacent to the Boise River will
be financed by other funding sources. This amount is assumed to be
$880,683.87.
Based on the above explanation, the following calculations are used to determine
the total cost for the future pathway facilities to be financed by the impact fee:
Pathways Cost After Deficiency + Portion of Cost for Fee Study = Future Facility Cost
$2,463,414.74 + $9,250 = $2,472,664.74
Future Facility Cost - Other Funding Sources = Cost Financed By Impact Fee
$2,472,664.74 - $880,683.87 = $1,592,001.62
Based on the above assumptions and calculations, $1,592,001.62 is the amount
to be financed by development impact fees.
C. Fee Calculation
The impact fee calculation is a simple process. The fee will be paid only by
future residential development. Therefore, by dividing the cost of
$1,592,001.62 by 10,802 future dwelling units, the pathway facilities impact fee
is $147.38 per dwelling unit. The fee calculation methodology for pathway
facilities is shown on Table 4 on page 27.
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 26
Table 4
Pathway Fee Calculation
Future Facility Cost = $2,472,664/4
Future Facility Cost $2,472,664.74
- Other Funding Sources (1) - $880,663.12
Future Development's Total Cost $1,592,001.62
Future Development's / Projected = Fee/ DU
Total Cost Dwelling Units
$1,592,001.62 / 10,802 = $147.38
Cost per Dwelling Unit = $147.38
NOTES:
(1) It is assumed that other funding sources will be used to pay for 80% of the cost
of the four paths along the Boise River.
May 11, 1999
D. Optional Financing Mechanisms
The following is a list of optional financing mechanisms that can be used to
finance pathway facilities. Each of these mechanisms is described in more detail
in the Financing Options chapter, beginning on page 36.
► General Taxes
► State-Shared Revenues
► Local Bonds
► Impact Fees
► Special District
► Federal Payment In-Lieu of Taxes Funds
► Community Development Block Grants
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 28
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PHASING
INTRODUCTION
Projecting phasing of necessary capital improvements can be a difficult task in the State
of Idaho. On the one hand, it is in the city's best interest to pay for facilities as they
are needed to maintain an adequate level of service standard. On the other hand, the
Idaho Development Impact Fee Act requires that monies collected through impact fees
must be spent within specified time frames or else they must be refunded. The
"refund" requirement sets significant constraints on a city in determining the timing of
new capital facilities.
The time constraints placed on the facilities being addressed by the City of Eagle is five
years with the ability to extend to a total of eight years given special circumstances.
What this means is that any dollar collected by impact fees must be spent within a
maximum eight year period from the date it was collected. This makes the phasing of
capital improvements more dependent on when the money needs to be spent than on
when the improvement is actually needed. Until the State legislature changes this
"refund" requirement to more reasonable time limits, cities will have to contend with
phasing schedules that may not relate to need as much as financial expediency.
This chapter proposes a phasing schedule that takes the spending time limits of the Act
into account as much as possible. It is in no one's interest to collect money for needed
improvements and then ending up refunding it back eight years later. Keep in mind,
that this phasing schedule should be reviewed and modified on an annual basis to
accommodate changes in growth rate and demand. It is not intended to be a cast-in-
concrete schedule for all time. It will need to be reviewed constantly to be a useful tool
and to ensure that all monies collected will be spent on needed capital facilities.
Facility phasing is divided into three time periods:
1 year - Facilities scheduled to be funded within the first year of adoption
of this study;
5 year - Facilities that are scheduled to be funded within five years of the
adoption of this study; and
6+ years - Facilities that will be scheduled to be funded sometime beyond
six years.
The residential phasing is shown on Tables 8 and 9. It is important to note that these
phasing projections are for planning purposes only and are not intended to be used for
anything other than educated guesses on future growth. The intent of these projections
is to give the City Council an idea as to when facilities may be needed and when
collected monies may need to be spent. It is simply a planning tool to give the city
notice to do detailed capital improvement planning.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 29
H. RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS
Growth projections are difficult to predict. There are many variables associated with
future growth that an exact yearly amount of growth can only be estimated. This
estimate can be helpful for the purposes of providing future public facilities.
The growth that has occurred in the City of Eagle since 1993 to present averages at
about 257 new home building permits issued per year. The future growth projections
provided by APA indicate a total increase of 543 new dwelling units between the year
2000 and 2005. This equates to about 108 new home building permits issued per year.
The residential phasing projections in this study assume that there will be approximately
182 new home building permits issued per year. This amount was determined by
adding the past trend average of 257 units per year to the APA projected 108 units per
year and dividing by two. We believe this to be a practical estimate to give the City
Council an idea as to when facilities may need to come on line. If the growth rate
changes, as it inevitably will, the projections' table will also change.
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 30
TABLE 5
RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS
* * * FOR FACILITY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY * * *
STATUS YEARS PHASED TOTAL TOTAL
DWELLING DWELLING STUDY AREA
(1) UNITS UNITS POPULATION
Notes
Existing 1999 4,183 4,183 10,625
Projected 1999 182 4,365 11,087
2000 182 4,547 11,549
2001 182 4,729 12,012
2002 182 4,911 12,474
2003 182 5,093 12,936
2004 182 5,275 13,399
2005 182 5,457 13,861
2006 182 5,639 14,323
2007 182 5,821 14,785
2008 182 6,003 15,248
2009 182 6,185 15,710
2010 182 6,367 16,172
2011 182 6,549 16,635
2012 182 6,731 17,097
2013 182 6,913 17,559
2014 182 7,095 18,021
2015 182 7,277 18,484
2016 182 7,459 18,946
2017 182 7,641 19,408
2018 182 7,823 19,870
2019 182 8,005 20,333
2020 182 8,187 20,795
TOTAL 8,187 8,187 20,795
(1) The residential phasing is for projections over a 20 year period.
Projections beyond this time assume the same annual
population increase until build out of the city.
May 11, 1999
TEL PARK FACILITIES PHASING
The Park Facilities Phasing table provided on page 33 identifies when park facilities
will need to be provided. The table shows that there is an existing deficiency of 30.98
acres. This deficiency will be reduced 7.88 acres by the appropriation of$315,000 for
park facilities. A deficiency will continue to appear until the city can obtain other
funds to correct the deficiency. After the appropriation of the $315,000 and assuming
$65,000 per acre for the acquisition and construction of park facilities, a remaining
$1,223,323.89 will be needed to correct the existing facilities deficiency. It has been
determined that to correct the existing park facilities deficiency, the city will
appropriate 61,166.19 per year for 20 years to be spent on acquiring and constructing
new parks. The Park Facilities Phasing table indicates that every five years new park
facilities will be developed at a cost of$305,830.97. Funding for these park facilities
will come from sources other than impact fees such as grants, donations, property taxes
and/or the general fund. The park acreage for the years 2003 and 2008 are different
due to park land that has already been acquired. The years 2013 and 2018 assume that
all acquired land has been used.
Park facilities funded by the collection of impact fees will be provided every five years.
It is assumed that $455,000 from previously collected impact fees will be appropriated
for the development of 7.0 acres in the year 2003. It is assumed that by the year 2008
$520,000 will be appropriated for the development of 8.0 acres of park facilities.
Additional park facilities will be provided as shown on Table 6. The location for these
future park facilities is currently unknown.
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 32
g
W
CO
Co
CO
to VI t»40 69 V) E9� to O X -N•I
Ca 00 � 00N WOO1 000 ■
'� 1
al 01 cn 0 cn rn cn o (n • 0 _1 —I
C.) 0 C.) 0 w � wCD b mZ 0C!)
00 00 0 (n 00 O 0 �
-' o 43o � o .0o o ••
CD C (D CD W o o o o _
CT
v v v m
CU OO p O O O a O N ..
-, D. -, ',. -1 _. -, D. -0
0 p) O m 0 0 O m
(D CD CD � (D -
p1• a 01' 0. p1' a p)' Cl. _, 0
•t; -4, (D (D -4. • -4, ID -I N N N N N N N) N N N N N N N N N N N N N) N - m
Q O Q O 0. O Q O (FD > g).1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O (O D
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O (0
3 3 3 3 0. r O to co V rn cn A W N -• O CO 03 J a) (n A W N O co co 73
-fi
3n) 3a) 3n) 3o -,
m -n m r1 m -n m -n - Z M y
9.. a Q. 'o �. co E. v co ri r cn
m CD (D _ CD O A W Z D
5 w N W N W N W D •1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N co 0
-1a Cu 73 El) NU 'D
N N
'n+' N W n O 0
0. -n 0r 0. -n 0. �1 W a c m -1
rn a
DCD D' (D N O D (D o0 03 V V J V V co O) a) a) ) a) (7( (n (n Ut cn A A A A A W -I
W r W r W r W rn N co 8 O N Cn V 100 f. W A a) ID O N W Ch V (D N A O 0 0
0C 0.. = 0. 0 a_ C Cl) V V at co CO J Cn W -+ co J al W co V al W co V (T W
0 0 a Q
0 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0
D
7 Iv 7 CO 7 0- 7 Cl E 0 m<
0 0 0 O 0 (D 0 (D 'a .'m(1 C m
��, C hi, C -+, (D ', ((DD 0 D x
7 CD 7 (D = O = 0 X. M .74 .17‹
0- N 0- N 0- 0 o_
A A A A A A A A A A A P A A A A A A A A A A R1 O
,. _ ,. 00 .� a) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) a) o) o) in a) o) rn a) a) cn o) a) rn o) Z
O 0 O a O N O N (D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
o (D 2 (D 0 fD 0 (D y
.0 <
< .0 W N W .
C. (D CD U 0
N o 0 0
-1
7 N0 C O. 1 O
ta) N N N D
= 00 = V O V ' D 0 •-
0. N _ ( A ) 7C W V O O co co co co co v J O 0) )n (h A A co W N N N -• -. O --I r
"(, O ■'(
O 068 N n C 0, 0) cu J W OD 0 AO Cn O O -•J N V W -co W -co a O In O O
( ) = N N W O 00 W A N O (D W N V O A 81 N W O(D W) J N A D O LN Z
N cn N -, _, 0) — a
'A
N 2a o ° N @ mn "0 Z
.p ;a N a -4 (-' 0 0o a) a) a) Q� O a) (h (h (h (n (h ix (h A A A A A co co co W r D '"
7C 7C •..f 0 CD Oo �1 CO A N co J m A W O CO J (n A N co co Cn N Z N
jO 0 W N it -+ in O in O A (O A Co 'co b) W J N V K) 6 in -, in O O O
D) O co C 0 "4 p) N O V CI) N 0 J A N (D V A N CD V A N CD 0) A � (D O) A
o .-r o .-h (U = -41 D u1 v "® D
W 0 _ n
n a CO
(A a) U) V) .-f co D (Ji a) a) a) W Ch Ch (h (n A A A •P A N N N N N -. -• -• --• �1 T1 C > r-
0 0 n • Ch (n Ch N N N N N) 0 0 0 0 O a) a) O) a) a) -` -• --, A m r
XI
0 r ,� O C W w 0 0 0 b) in 0 b) io io (D io (o 'a) rn rn rn rn 'o io io io • N .< W 0 m
O O o) (D N 0o co 00 co co 0o co 0o co V J J J V 0 0 0 0 0 a) a) a) a) oo
0 � v m c, 0) ., > 'T1
C
0
D >ja 0 C i > >
u) iii. (D C. = 0. > m m r n
C C (n 7r 0 0
O C ch r O. 0 •< M C D
" " �� N -• iN W A
(D D r O W W . O j C . N - -• N N N "� O N
-+ C C0 m h (h W N O f N O (D J CO CO J W A O (
7 D 0 = X, N N J -+ W CO W V N A co W i�0 W -. a) a) O N a) m i0 v
<< u) A -. (0 J A N (D V Cn N CD A CO J A -+ co -• co O W co m
C C v = Cn
o (0
0 0 �' -oo fn to to to tf -en to 4A-u1 to .sn.En fl to tnl t»t»tt -En to to to m m m O
* * 0 0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (O (o (o (D (o (o O 0 (o O (o (D (o (o (O (o (o (o X < D L
n1 (o to (o CO (D CD CD CD CO CD (D
.(O CO (0 Co CD (0 (D (D CD (O CD ..< m
n rn
=O !
%aiuwwwwiai,lww-Oa wwwilww-CO wwww m Z "I 0
? � s _a -a _s _s �l � _& _s ._1 � ^
A � d. .A4 . ,A =. A � Ap � � .P. 4=. AOmmrn
`< A
O O (D O 0 (o D D (O o O D (O Co D O O (o (O (D O (O O m 0
C s _s _s
_1 . . . . . . . ,— 0
_
474 (.1444) 47/4.694.44,4 4114.44d4164 to tsl TA V) to�to m 'o O 3
N Ni --L to .A CO N -s to W N .5 to � W N -s ffl CO N ffl 0
W www (n00001 s -s s .-s ' w ( A4 �• (C) (OCC) (0 < DLC
06 01 O) O)�! Oo 0 (D Cn O) O) 'J Oo 00 (O O O -, V V W (O m n m [r
(OcO mNCOO) W O -,J .A0 -4 A -, co (nNO) CnNCOO) CtoZ -10 >
N N —s (o , W (n W N O (O V O) A W � O 0 - 0 .A N
00 0o W 0o W Co W 0o W 0o W 00 .A (O .A (o A (D A (o A (O •A O m rn m C
0 0 -- N 'co W l� (n 0 �1 00 (O 0 -% N N W :IN, (n 0) -I OO (O 0 m o rn
A .A W NOCOOO -1O) (n .A W IV -sO (D000 (n A W N -,. O
cri p I
mm
XIX
0 0
mm
rn m
z 0
—I
rn
3 (o C C C
73 n) mn1
a , -, -, -
< . (n N
CD 3 D 3 � 3
m • -a --, -a
.• oco
(0 (1) < c0 <
,< (D =- (D
0
_ (D CD
• _ _
.
W to
IV. PATHWAY FACILITIES PHASING
The Pathway Facilities Phasing table provided on page 35 identifies when pathway
facilities will need to be provided. The table shows that there is a current deficiency of
pathway facilities available. In order to correct this deficiency, the City of Eagle must
construct 23,665.96 linear feet of pathways. The construction time for these pathways
is not known at this time, however, it is assumed that the funding will be appropriated
by the year 2003. The location of any pathway improvements will be based on the
future logical pathway connections needed at that time. Funding for additional
pathways will occur in the years 2003, 2008, 2013 and 2018.
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 34
K
v
(n
(.O
co
(r A W N
- _� - - N O X -.1
W W W W A 11 --I —I
O O O O 0
al .a ...1 -co . N Z C
N N N N 0) 0
O O O O --•
O O O O O „
CT CT CT CT CT
CD CD CD CD CD
0) (1) 0) CD CD . Z
-0 -0 -0 -0 -0 O
"O "O 'D -O -6 0
O O O O O CD
"O 'O "O -O '0 N
0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
CD O. 0. CD CD -I
0 N N N N N N N N N N N to N N N N N N N N N -• -• D
o o 3 3 3 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O (D
N CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO (D
r O (D 0) J O) (n A W N -• O (O o) V O) 01 A W N O CO (D ITJ
0
0) 0)) 0)) r0)) 7'
• 7 7 7 cr) p
'n -n m -n -. 'v
n o o n n Z 1 D
N
:_rt -. 5. co A N Z v
CD CD CD CD (p G)
U) Cl) N U) O CO Co CO co O CO CO CO CO CO Co CD Co CO Co Co CO CO CO CO CO O CO
CA y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W
3 3 3 3 -
0) 0) 0) N 0 '.c)
can) --I
o O
TI m m m 0 C_ 0
CD CD CD CD C m
CD CD CD (D 0. CO D
a) co 7.I J :! J 7,I 0) O) 0 0) 0) 0) w Cn w Cn CT A A A A A 0 u-
m 71 -n m < s O co 0) A N O CO v N W -• O 0o -co A N O lo -,J fn W 1 CT)
C C C C (D O CO O N A (n J (O W A CA Co O N W Cn J (O -• N A O co a
=• m d. (1 O V J Cn W CO J (n W -• CO V G) W -• CO J Cn W -• CO J (n W
'D
O O O O N
a Q a o_ co
Z o _<13 M
CD• <m <can 33 c
... m C z
D• 'D 'O -a O O N -i --G
0) 0) 0) N A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A T m O
-0 D -D -O 5 0) 0) O) O) O) 0) O) O) O) O) 0) 0) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) N Z
-D -O "O -O (D N N N N N N N N N N N N) N N N N N N N N N N N
4)
O O X X -'
_,)
N N N N ,Or
O I -0
CD CAD (D CD O - -
Co I
co N 5 D D
0 N N
0) 0 0 (0 (O CO Co Co .1 J O) m C) 01 A A CO C.) N N N -• O O r f A
< co v (W CO A CO A O CT O O) �; IV J 0) CO W CO A O (n O O) V/
0 0 0 0 CD C!) cfD)) W 0 CO 00)) CO N (00 J 01 N 0 OA) C00n W O (00 0) A N (AD CO (Nn Z
0 00 00 00 _ Z
v G)
CD 0) N CD r co O D �O
--h --ti --). 0 ~ CO CD CD CD W Co CO CO V J V J O CO O) O) O) (n ()) CT CT A r- 3 = ■
(D O 0 O N .� J A N O 03 0) A CO J (n G) CO co A N O CO a) W a D C
(D CD (D (D ,_.Y O -CO J Cn A W CD Co n in ..) N O -co v in A N O O J O "' Z G 0
rr rr r-t rr CO O A
-+. (0 G) J --• 01 CD W CO j 0) O A CO N 0) O 01 CO G.) J -• D O • W (O (0N W 01 O) J CO O N W A m V CO (D o N W A CA o •[
D O O O O
7 C°.,. (D N W O -• A O j G) in Cr) N A O O 'CO A O J CA T
CG CO Ca CO N• A CO W J Co W v a) V C) O A Cn O A oO W A CO W V CU
N Ei v N o p r
=
g m
r-r r-r — .-r CD CD CO D y
N 0) 0) 0) r7t O (D co co W co co co CO J J J J J 0) O) 0 O O) N N N N N C -1 C
•< O O O O A A A A A N N N N N -• -• -• -• (T (n U) al (n T --0 1 1 >
C -I O O O A A A A ? Cb -co Cb 0) -CO N N N N N (0 (0 (O (O (0 "' r
I- r r r 7 Cr (n (n (n 01 (n 01 cn (n 01 01 01 01 VI 01 (n (n 01 CT 0 0 0 0 0 > -<
7C cD iD (D iD CO (O iO (O CO CO CO (O iD CO iD 0 iO iD (0 O 0 O O O D D
N 0 0 0 7 00 0) 0)a) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0
0 Z 0
I-> > _ r-
• �'N ET• ). � om D
''..1
O 0 0 0 n m m
W W N N N r"0 D C m
CD (76-'
CD CD 0 -• -• W a) A N v A N (n W N O J Cn W m C D
O r7-r r7-r 0 co O O N N_ O 0o N j O ao J Ui cn "co a) (n .) Co 4) 10 -co O) Cl)
N CO CA N 01 CO al N CD 0 A N J () 0 0 A Co N 0)
.< •G ••< ...< • N 01 A O -.1 (D (D co N A Cn a) N 00 O - N 0) O N W A CT v C)
CO CD Co j CD O V CO CT -+ N G) A O N A O N CO A O J Co
C C C C 00 co Co C•1 N J co CT O -, N (O O 0o CO A Co (b W A co W J
7 7 7 7
X X X X
7 7 7 7
O 0 0 0
> > P P 4AEfl(flEfl69{flEAEfl69EAEAb9 (4.69 <A 4)1 (AH)fflb9 rn m 13 O
N N N N N N N N N.) N N.) .) N N N N N N N N N N X < > C.,
O a) 0000) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 000000000 _on 0 rn
00 ao In ao 00 03 0)ao CO ao ao o)Co 00 0000 0000-CO O0 0)00 m Z 0
N N N IV N.) N.) N N N.) N N.) h) N N N N N N N N N N 4A D C -Ti --I
W CO W W W W W W W W W 0) W 0) W W W W W W 0) W O m m m
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O m y
-► 0
4/1 Eft*AEA-AEA -A Eft-A EA E» K)E!) �EA-AEA �-AE!)En < D O 3
Q) 0) . .s . (Oa) W .030) 0) -CA S 01 WEAC) CDU) N C- C
CD (ONC31 (ONCr00 -sQ) Cb - •DA -Al -AA �J0 W -I00) 0) ZC) C) r
NU7000 -AW U) -.J'CO A) W CTI �J (ONAO -ICONA0) 0)
0 O -J 07 CO 0 W -• CO N.) CO -Al C) N C) CO --• CO 0 CO 0 A. N •A C m -I -I
NNC00A -). ODCTNO V 3s -, 000 co O V NJ (O0W OmmiP <
(), C)) W --• Co 4 ()) W -• (f) V U) I.) O (A O A N O CA 6 A N O m v m
co O V Q) 0 01 A W N V -• 0 CC) 00 -4 -I 0) n A W N.) N O
CM A W Z
7
N 0 'O -0
73 X
C O
mm
c
m
Z m m-/
CO
ID 00) m 00i
-, -, -,
0 N -A 30- 3
O C O
a) m co CD CD (D
7 7
N N
FINANCING OPTIONS
INTRODUCTION
As provided at the end of each facility section of this analysis, there are many ways the
City of Eagle can finance its present and future capital facility needs. This section
briefly describes some of the most widely used financing mechanisms.
A. General Taxes
The City of Eagle can levy property taxes, sales tax and a tax-like business
license fee which would form the main sources of revenue for the City. Any of
these taxes can be used to construct or improve capital facilities, but as a
practical matter virtually all revenues the City generates are needed for the day-
to-day operations of the City government, making it necessary to fmd other
ways to finance capital facilities.
B. Dedicated Taxes
Dedicated taxes are funds that are received from specified sources and disbursed
to pay for a specific function of government. The transient room tax (TRT) is a
good example of a dedicated tax. A TRT is imposed on lodgings within the
City and is a source of revenue. However, the funds received are limited to
costs for tourism promotion and the provision of facilities that help
accommodate visitors to the area.
C. State-shared Revenues
The State of Idaho distributes a share of the proceeds from its tax on the sale of
gasoline to counties and cities. This money is the principal source of funding
for local road maintenance and improvements, which is the only purpose for
which it can be used.
The State also distributes a portion of its sales tax and liquor proceeds to cities
and counties. This revenue is not dedicated to a specific purpose, but is used to
supplement general tax revenues.
D. Local Bond Issues
Local governments can borrow money to finance capital facilities projects by
issuing bonds. There are two basic types of bonds. General obligation (GO)
bonds are repaid using a dedicated property tax levy. Revenue bonds, which are
often used to install or improve water and sewage utilities, are repaid with user
fees. Bonds can generally be issued only if approved by a vote of the
jurisdiction's taxpayers.
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 36
E. Impact Fees
Impact fees can be a significant funding source to finance large scale public
facilities and services. Impact fees are intended to ensure that new development
pay its proportional share of public facilities based on the impacts created by
this new development.
The following is a list of the public facilities as identified in the Idaho
Development Impact Fee Act that have a life expectancy of ten or more years
and allow for the collection of impact fees for the purposes of improvements to
the facilities to mitigate against the impacts from future development:
i. Water supply production, treatment, storage and distribution facilities;
ii. Wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities;
iii. Roads, streets and bridges, including rights-of-way, traffic signals,
landscaping and any local components of state or federal highways
iv. Storm water collection, retention, detention, treatment and disposal
facilities, flood control facilities, and bank and shore protection and
enhancement improvements;
v. Parks, open space and recreation areas, and related capital
improvements; and
vi. Public safety facilities, including law enforcement, fire, emergency
medical and rescue and street lighting facilities.
F. User Fees
User fees are usually authorized by statute for specific uses and are typically
required for connection to sewer and water systems. The fees are used as a
revenue source to maintain the systems in proper operating condition and for the
construction of facilities needed to meet demand.
G. Special Districts
Special districts can be created to help fmance the provision and, in many cases,
maintenance of new facilities that benefit specific areas. People within a special
district must pay an additional property tax levy or user fees to help repay the
bonds issued by the district and finance its ongoing operations.
Idaho law allows the City of Eagle to form improvement districts and special
service districts. The residents of an area may also petition to have a special
district created. The procedures are slightly different for each type of district,
but all involve an opportunity for property owners to protest the formation of
the district.
Development Impact Fee Study / May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 37
Assuming that a majority of property owners in an area are willing, special
districts might be used to finance water and sewer facilities, major roadways and
other public facilities that serve specific areas.
H. State Grants and Assistance Programs
The State of Idaho has a variety programs intended to assist local jurisdiction in
financing public facilities and services. These programs generally must be used
for specific projects and by which an application requesting the assistance must
be provided to the state. The financial assistance from the state can be in the
form of a proprietary option to purchase state property, funds clear of the need
from repayment, matching funds and/or low interest loans. Some of the funds
are also matched by the federal government, but are still managed by the state.
Federal Assistance
The federal government also provides a variety of programs available to local
jurisdictions for financial assistance. One of the more common funding sources
is the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Other typical
sources of funds are federal matching funds for state run assistance programs. It
must be noted that by the end of the 1980s, the funds available from the federal
government have substantially decreased. Other available funding sources are
as follows:
1. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - GRANTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS
AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT - The objective of this
grant is to promote economic development and assist in the construction
of facilities needed to encourage the creation and retention of permanent
jobs in areas experiencing severe economic distress. The facilities can
include water and sewer systems, industrial access roads to industrial
parks, rail road siding and spurs, tourism facilities, vocational schools,
business incubator facilities and infrastructure improvements for
industrial parks. The basic grant may fund up to 50% of the cost of the
facilities. For communities that are severely depressed the grant may
fund up to 80% of the cost of the facilities.
2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS - Although not as
plentiful as they once were, Community Development Block Grants
(CDBG) are still available for wide variety of infrastructure
improvements needed by local governments.
II. SUMMARY
The recommended financing mechanism used to fund the park and pathway facilities
identified in this study were previously identified within the facility analysis for each
facility. The recommended mechanism will be based on the appropriateness of the
mechanism to the amount of funds and the facility needs.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 38
IMPLEMENTATION
INTRODUCTION
This section deals with the actual mechanics of collecting the impact fee. The
implementation measures to be discussed include the timing of collection and the fee
collection method.
II. TIMING OF FEE COLLECTION
For collection of the impact fee, it is proposed that all fees be collected at the time of
building permit issuance. There are several reasons for collecting the impact fees at
building permit issuance rather than at an earlier development approval stage or at a
later occupancy stage. First, the collection of the fee at building permit issuance is
timed more closely to when the actual impacts of the development to public facilities
will occur. In most instances, when a building permit is acquired, construction usually
occurs in a relatively short period of time. Collecting a fee earlier in the process (e.g.,
at the development approval stage) contains a greater risk that the development will not
actually be constructed. In that event, the City is obligated to refund monies collected
after a certain period of time. This can create both financial and administrative
problems for the county, especially if the money has already been spent on a new
facility.
Second, collection of the fee at building permit issuance will be administratively easier
since most other fees are collected at this time. The necessary accounting of fees to
ensure that the monies are spent on facilities actually being impacted by the particular
development will be much easier if the money is collected at this stage.
Third, collecting the fee at a later stage of development (i.e., at time of occupancy)
creates another burden on the City to collect the fee after construction is complete.
Many people may not be willing to pay the fee at that point making it necessary for the
City to institute enforcement procedures. This typically adds another strain on City
resources and does not lend itself to good public relations.
III. FEE COLLECTION METHOD
The method used by the City to collect fees is critical to ensure that fees are collected in
a proper manner and accounted for in order to withstand any legal challenges. It is
recommended that the fees for each facility be charged separately. Although this may
sound cumbersome, it is the best way to guarantee an accurate accounting of all fees
collected. The basic premise of collecting impact fees is that the fees will be used for
specific facilities that are being impacted by the new development. The City is required
to account for every penny collected and to set up separate accounts for holding and
subsequently spending these fees. Money collected for parks cannot be spent on
circulation. Monies collected to pay for a circulation facility cannot be spent
somewhere else in the City.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 39
Another reason to collect fees separately is that if one fee is successfully challenged in
the courts, the remaining fees will remain intact. In other words, successful challenge
of one fee will not invalidate the entire fee program.
From the developer's point of view, it makes no difference if the fees are accounted for
separately. The developer would receive a cost accounting of individual fees, but only
one check for the total fee would be required.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 40
CONCLUSION
The Development Impact Fee Study provides the City of Eagle with the information needed to
ensure that land use and public investment decisions are based on an accurate assessment of the
current availability of, and future demand for, public facilities and services.
The impacts assumed by future development are based on the existing land use designations
and the current census data available. Changes to the land use designations could occur in the
future to reflect the desires of future residents or political decision makers. These changes
may lead to different impacts to public facilities. In addition, changing demographics may also
result in different impacts to public facilities. Development trends and demographic changes
will continue to evolve and shape the development and growth of the study area. To
compensate for these changes, the park facilities and pathway facilities analyses should be
updated on a regular basis to maintain the validity of the study and to effectively plan for these
facilities in the future.
As previously demonstrated, the impact fee amounts provided should pay for the all future
impacts to park facilities and pathway facilities. The Development Impact Fee Study and the
impact fees should be updated from time to time in order to ensure that the fees continue to pay
for impacts created by future development as well as maintain proportionate fairness. The
update to this study and the impact fees should be conducted as determined necessary by the
Eagle City Council.
In conclusion, the City of Eagle - Development Impact Fee Study is a document that can be
utilized in a wide variety of ways to prepare for and assist in the management of growth in the
future. The information presented in this study will help the City of Eagle decision makers
understand the projected extent of their community's growth and anticipate the costs of
providing the park facilities and pathway facilities needed to accommodate that growth. It
should be consulted often to ensure that proposed development within the study area can be
accommodated by the existing and future facilities identified. This study is a working
document that can be used as the basis to develop other capital improvement studies and
programs to ensure all other public facilities will meet the impacts created by future
development.
This study is also known as Addendum A of the City of Eagle Development Impact Fee
Ordinance. The approval of this study and the ordinance will allow the City of Eagle the
ability to collect impact fees for the facilities identified.
Development Impact Fee Study/ May 11, 1999
Capital Improvements Plan 41