Loading...
Findings - PZ - 2011 - PP/FP-02-10 - A Re-Sub Of Lots 2-5, Block 2 Of Eaglefield Estates Subd No. 1/1.01 Acre/ BEFORE THE EAGLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION ) FOR A COMBINED PRELIMINARY ) PLAT/FINAL PLAT FOR EAGLEFIELD ) ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO.2 FOR ) COLEMAN HOME,LLC ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CASE NUMBER PP/FP-02-10 The above-entitled Combined Preliminary Plat/Final Plat came before the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation on February 7, 2011, at which time public testimony was taken and the public hearing was closed. The Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; FINDINGS OF FACT: A. PROJECT SUMMARY: Coleman Homes, LLC, represented by Becky McKay with Engineering Solutions, LLP, is requesting combined preliminary plat and final plat approval for Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 2 (a re-subdivision of Lots 2-5, Block 2 of Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1). The 1.01-acre subdivision will consist of six (6) single-family residential lots. The site is located south of W. Escalante Drive between N. Baxter Way and N. Vandries Way at 318 N. Vandries Way, 354 N. Vandries Way, 5070 W. Lockner Street, and 357 N. Baxter Way. B. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL: A Neighborhood Meeting was held at 6:00 PM, Wednesday,November 10, 2010, at the Eagle City Hall(Freedom Room) located at 660 E. Civic Lane, in compliance with the application submittal requirement of Eagle City Code. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on December 3, 2010. C. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice of Public Hearing on the application for the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission was published in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and the Eagle City Code on January 17, 2011. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners within three-hundred feet(300-feet)of the subject property in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and Eagle City Code on January 14, 2011. Requests for agencies' reviews were transmitted December 10, 2010, in accordance with the requirements of the Eagle City Code. The site was posted in accordance with the Eagle City Code January 28, 2011. D. HISTORY OF RELEVANT PREVIOUS ACTIONS: On January 24, 2006, the City Council approved an annexation and rezone from RR (Rural Residential-Ada County Designation)to R-2-DA-P(Residential-two units per acre with a development agreement—planned unit development), R-4-DA-P (Residential-four units per acre with a development agreement—Planned Unit Development) and MU-DA- P (Mixed Use—with a development agreement—Planned Unit Development), conditional use, preliminary development plan, preliminary plat, and vacation of right-of-way Page 1 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eagleiield Estates No.2 pzf.doc approvals for Eaglefield Estates Planned Unit Development (A-11-04/RZ-17-04/CU-10- 04/PPUD-3-04/PP-9-04NAC-2-04) for this site. The Development Agreement (Inst. #106057136) associated with RZ-17-04 and planned unit development findings of fact and conclusions of law for the aforementioned applications are incorporated herein by reference. On February 13, 2007, the City Council approved FPUD-03-06 & FP-10-06 (No. 1) & FPUD-4-06 &FP-11-06 (No. 2) for a final development plan and final plats for Eaglefield Estates Subdivision Phases No. 1 &No. 2, for Eaglefield, LLC. On March 25, 2008, the City Council approved a modification (RZ-17-04 MOD) to the development agreement(Instrument#109031309)to modify the approved setbacks for the development and modify the municipal water Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to allow for the amendments to be made to the MOA without a modification to the development agreement. On May 16, 2008,the final plat for Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1 was recorded at the Ada County Recorder's Office. On August 25, 2009, Eaglefield, LLC, represented by Clint Boyle with Landmark Engineering and Planning, submitted an Extension of Time application for Eaglefield Estates and Eaglefield Estates II Subdivisions(EXT-13-09). On October 27, 2009,the City Council remanded the Extension of Time application for Eaglefield Estates and Eaglefield Estates II Subdivisions(EXT-13-09)to staff. On August 10, 2010,the City Council approved a preliminary plat extension of time application for Eaglefield Estates Subdivision to be valid until February 12, 2012 (EXT- 06-10). E. COMPANION APPLICATIONS: RZ-17-04 MOD2 —A modification of the development agreement to eliminate the shared driveway common access easements associated with Lots 3-13, Block 1, Lots 2-5, Block 2 (this site), and Lots 1-4, 18-21, 23-26, Block 6, as referenced in Condition of Development #2.2 and shown on Exhibit "D1", within the Development Agreement Modification (Instrument #109031309). The modification is also being requested to change the fifteen(15) four-plex lots into seventeen(17)single-family lots. VAC-02-10 — A request to vacate the shared driveway common access easements associated with Lots 3-13, Block 1, Lots 2-5, Block 2, and Lots 1-4, 18-21, 23-26, Block 6. Page 2 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc F. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AND ZONING MAP DESIGNATIONS: COMP PLAN ZONING LAND USE DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Existing High Density MU-DA-P (Mixed Use with a Residential Subdivision Residential development agreement—PUD) — Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1 (Lots 2-5, Block 2) Proposed No Change No Change Re-subdivision of Eaglefield Estates Subdivision (Lots 2-5, Block 2) North of site Transitional R-4-DA-P(Residential up to four Residential Subdivision Residential units per acre with a development —Eaglefield Estates agreement—PUD) Subdivision No. 1 South of site Mixed Use and RUT(Ada County designation)and Single-family dwellings Commercial C-2-DA (General business district —Compton Andrews with a development agreement) Tract East of site High Density MU-DA-P(Mixed Use with a Residential Subdivision Residential development agreement—PUD) —Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1 West of site High Density MU-DA-P (Mixed Use with a Residential Subdivision Residential development agreement—PUD) —Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1 G. DESIGN REVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICT: Not located within the DDA, TDA, CEDA, or DSDA. H. SITE DATA: Total Acreage of Site— 1.01 Total Number of Lots—6 Commercial=0 Industrial—0 Common—0 Total Number of Units—6 Total Acreage of Any Out-Parcels—0 Page 3 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No 2 pzf.doc ADDITIONAL SITE DATA PROPOSED REQUIRED Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre 5.93-units per acre Up to ten (10)units per acre Minimum Lot Size 6,996-square feet 5,000 square feet(minimum) Minimum Lot Width 55.98-feet 50-feet Minimum Street Frontage 55.98-feet 35-feet Total Acreage of Common Area 0-acres 0-acres (constructed as part of (measured as total landscaping of Eaglefield Estates Subdivision the entire site) No. 1) Percent of Site as Common Area 0% 0% (constructed as part of (measured as total landscaping of Eaglefield Estates Subdivision the entire site) No. 1) GENERAL SITE DESIGN FEATURES: Greenbelt Areas and Landscape Screening: The landscaping improvements were provided with the construction of Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1. Open Space: Because this is a re-subdivision of Lots 2-5, Block 2, of Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1 the required open space was provided as part of the Eaglefield Estates Planned Unit Development. Storm Drainage and Flood Control: The applicant should demonstrate that the storm water from individual lots is handled by a storm drainage facility or the applicant should place a note on the final plat stating all storm water from the individual lots is to be retained on the individual lots per Eagle City Code 9-4-1-10. This should be completed prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. Utility and Drainage Easements, and Underground Utilities: Eagle City Code section 9-3-6 requires utility easements to be not less than 12-feet wide. Fire Hydrants and Water Mains: Hydrants are to be located and installed as may be required by the Eagle Fire District. On-site Septic System(yes or no)—not allowed Preservation of Existing Natural Features: Staff is not aware of any existing natural features. Preservation of Existing Historical Assets: Staff is not aware of any existing historical assets on the site. If during excavation or development of the site, any historical artifacts are discovered, state law requires immediate notification to the state. J. STREET DESIGN: Private or Public Streets: Public No new streets, street widening, or dedication of right-of-way to the Ada County Highway District is proposed with this application. All streets within this subdivision were previously approved and constructed as part of Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1. Page 4 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc Applicant's Justification for Private Streets(if proposed):None proposed Blocks Less Than 500':None Cul-de-sac Design:N/A Sidewalks, curbs and gutters: Sidewalks were constructed as part of Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 1. Curbs and gutters which meet Ada County Highway District standards have been constructed abutting the interior streets. Lighting: All street lighting has been installed as part of Eaglefield Estates No. 1. Street Names: No new streets are proposed with this application. K. ON AND OFF-SITE PEDESTRIANBICYCLE CIRCULATION: Pedestrian Walkways: See discussion under"Sidewalks"above. Bike Paths: None proposed. L. PUBLIC USES PROPOSED:None proposed. M. PUBLIC USES SHOWN ON FUTURE ACQUISITIONS MAP:No map currently exists N. SPECIAL ON-SITE FEATURES: Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—No Evidence of Erosion—No Fish Habitat—No Floodplain—No Mature Trees—No Riparian Vegetation—No Steep Slopes—No Stream/Creek—No Unique Animal Life—No Unique Plant Life—No Unstable Soils—No Wildlife Habitat—No- Historical Sites—No O. SUMMARY OF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PLAN: Not required P. AGENCY RESPONSES: The following agencies have responded and their correspondence is attached to the staff report. Comments, which appear to be of special concern, are noted below: Ada County Highway District — Indicated that prior to ACHD signing the final plat written documentation will be required showing that public access to the site has been obtained and will remain to provide access to the site. Page 5 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc Boise River Flood Control District No. 10—No specific recommendations Central District Health Department — Indicated that written approval must be provided from the service providers of central sewer and central water Chevron Pipe Line—Indicated no conflict with the pipe line Idaho Transportation Department — Indicated that no access from the subdivision or individual lot to State Highway 44 will be allowed Department of Environmental Quality—Verging that there is adequate water and sewer to serve the project. Drainage District No. 2 — Indicated that Drainage District No. 2 entered into a License Agreement for certain encroachments and discharge with Eaglefield LLC. The District will have to review the plans for any new encroachments within the District's easement or affecting the District's drains prior to any approval. Eagle Fire District — Indicated that they have no opposition to the application and approve the proposed changes to the development. Star Fire District — Indicated they have no comment since these applications fall within the Eagle Fire District Q. LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC: None received as of this date. STAFF ANALYSIS PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT: A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: Residential Six Plus Suitable primarily for multi-family housing including apartments, town homes and duplexes within the urbanized setting adjacent to designated transit corridors. An allowable density of up to 10 units per 1 acre. 6.6 Land Use Implementation Strategies C. Provide for a broad spectrum of housing types including apartments,townhouses, condominiums, single family attached, manufactured homes, affordable and subsidized housing and large acreage developments. 6.8.1 Park Lane Planning Area The Park Lane Planning Area is designated as mixed use combining community commercial, professional office, and a variety of residential densities. The vision for the area is to recognize the activity center created by Eagle High School and existing development approved by Ada County and to provide compatible land uses at densities that accommodate pedestrian scale design and future mass transit. A. Uses The land use and development policies specific to the Park Lane Planning Area include the following: 7. The area located west of Linder Road and State Street shall provide for high density residential including apartments,town homes and patio homes, and transitioning northward to 1-2 units per acre. Internal circulation is essential to the development of this area; a loop/frontage road similar to Old Valley Page 6 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc Road should be created. Uses should focus on this roadway(not State Street) with berming and wide setbacks to be used to buffer any residential use from the regional transportation network. C. Access Access to and through should be limited to existing roads (Old Valley Road, Park Lane and Linder Road); no direct access from State Street/ Highway 44 shall be permitted unless a new access point is designated by the State of Idaho for Eagle Island State Park. The area to the north of State Highway 44 should require the construction of a frontage road (similar to Old Valley Road) that removes individual property access to State Highway 44. This high density area shall provide internal circulation and connectivity to the residential areas to the north. B. ZONING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: • Eagle City Code, Section 8-2-1 Districts Established Purposes And Restrictions: The following zoning districts are hereby established. For the interpretation of this title the zoning districts have been formulated to realize the general purposes as set forth in this title. In addition,the specific purpose of each zoning district shall be as follows: MU MIXED USE DISTRICT: To provide for a variety and mixture of uses such as limited office, limited commercial, and residential. This district is intended to ensure compatibility of new development with existing and future development. It is also intended to ensure assemblage of properties in a unified plan with coordinated and harmonious development which shall promote outstanding design without unsightly and unsafe strip commercial development. Uses should complement the uses allowed within the CBD zoning district. All development requiring a conditional use permit in the MU zoning district, as shown in section 8-2-3 of this chapter, shall occur under the PUD and/or development agreement process in accordance with chapter 6 or 10 of this title unless the proposed development does not meet the area requirements as set forth in section 8-6-5-1 of this title. In that case a cooperative development, in conjunction with adjacent parcels (to meet the minimum area requirements), shall be encouraged. Otherwise a conditional use permit shall be required unless the proposed use is shown as a permitted use in the MU zoning district within section 8-2-3 of this chapter. Residential gross densities shall not exceed ten (10) dwelling units per acre. When a property is being proposed for rezone to the MU zoning district, a development agreement may be utilized in lieu of the PUD and/or conditional use process if approved by the city council, provided the development agreement includes conditions of development that are required during the PUD and conditional use process. C. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE PROVISIONS WHICH OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: • Eagle City Code Section 9-2-3 (B)(1-5) Combining Preliminary and Final Plat in Minor Subdivisions: The applicant may request that the subdivision application be processed as both a preliminary and final plat if all the following exist: Page 7 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc 1. The proposed subdivision does not exceed ten(10) lots; 2. No new street dedication or street widening is involved; 3.No major special development considerations are involved such as development in a floodplain, hillside development or the like; 4. All required information for both preliminary and final plat is complete and in an acceptable form; and 5. The proposed subdivision is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or any provision of the Zoning Title of the City. • Eagle City Code Section 9-3-6 Easements A. Unobstructed utility easements shall be provided along front lot lines,rear lot lines and side lot lines. Total easement width shall not be less than twelve feet(12'), except that lesser easement widths, to coincide with respective setbacks,may be considered as part of the planned unit development. B. Unobstructed drainageway easements shall be provided in conjunction with the utility easement along side lot lines or as required by the city council. Total easement width, including the utility easement, shall not be less than twelve feet(12'), except that lesser easement widths,to coincide with respective setbacks,may be considered as part of the planned unit development. D. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: 2.1 The maximum density for the Property shall be 2.61-dwelling units per acre (312 single family lots and 15 four-plex lots). 2.2 The Gables-MU Zone(four-plex lots)Prefer to use a building envelope front rear side Coverage Size frontage setback setback side in out width 35% 10,000 35 20 20 5 20 50 The Cedars-R4 Zone (single family detached) front rear side Coverage Size* frontage setback setback side in out Width 6,000, 6,500 5 ft 1st +2.5 ft 40% & 7,000 35 20** 20 2nd 20** 50 *All lots between 6, 000 and 6,999 sq ft shall have shared/common drives. All lots less than 6,000 sq ft shall be alley loaded. See Exhibit"Dl"for lot access requirements. **15-foot front yard setback: Lots 4,6,8, and 10, Block 3 Lots 4,6,8,10,11,13,14,15,16, and 18, Block 4 Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11,Block 5 (Exhibit"Dl") Lot 10, Block 3, Lots 11-12, Block 4, Lots 1 and 11, Block 5, shall have street side yard setback of 10 ft. All lots within the"Cedars"requiring shared driveways shall be allowed front yard setbacks of 15' to side loaded garages. Front loaded garages shall have a 20' setback. Page 8 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eag1e Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No 2 pzfdoc 2.4 Eagle hereby acknowledges that the attached typical housing styles and lot layout plan (Exhibit "E") represents an example of the Property Owners' current concept for the site and understands and agrees that changes in that concept will likely occur but that the changes must substantially confonm to the concept plan and related designs herein. The Property Owner also understands and agrees that any changes regarding development of the site must be in conformance with the "Conditions of Development"stated herein. E. DISCUSSION: • The site is designated as High Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The property is currently located within the MU-DA-P (Mixed Use with a development agreement and planned unit development) zoning district. The site is also designated as being located within the Park Lane Planning Area on the Comprehensive Plan Planning Area Map. The applicant is proposing to re-subdivide four (4) residential four-plex lots into six (6) residential single-family lots. The proposed subdivision will have single-family residential lots ranging in size from 6,996 square-feet to 8,066 square feet. The applicant has also submitted an application to vacate the existing shared access/common driveway easement associated with this site along with a development agreement modification application requesting the residential four-plex lots (which this application consists of four (4) of those lots) within Eaglefield Estates Subdivision be changed to single-family residential lots. • The applicant is requesting combined preliminary plat and final plat approval and submitted a copy of a preliminary plat and final plat both of which are date stamped by the City on December 3, 2010. The preliminary plat and the final plat contain plat notes associated with the development. It should be noted that the preliminary plat and final plat notes do not coincide with one another so for discussion purposes staff will reference only those notes on the final plat. • Plat note #2 indicates that each lot contains an easement twelve feet(12') in width adjacent to any rear lot line. Pursuant to Eagle City Code, total easement width should not be less than twelve feet (12'). As proposed, the easement width adjacent to the rear property lines will be twenty four feet (24'). The preliminary plat shows an existing pressurized irrigation line located adjacent to and running within four feet (4') of the rear lot lines. The applicant may consider reducing the proposed rear lot line easement for each lot to six feet(6') in width for a total of twelve feet (12') in width between the adjacent lots. Should the applicant choose to reduce the rear lot line easement the applicant should provide a revised final plat which indicates that the easement width adjacent to the rear lot lines is six feet (6') prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. • Plat note #5 indicates that the minimum building setbacks, "shall be in accordance with the City of Eagle applicable zoning and subdivision regulations at the time of issuance of individual building permits or as specifically approved". The setbacks for the Eaglefield Estates Planned Unit Development are addressed within the development agreement associated with the rezone RZ-17-04. The applicant should submit a revised final plat showing plat note #5 modified to read, "Minimum building setbacks shall be in accordance with the setbacks as set forth in the conditions of development found within the development agreement and subsequent modifications for RZ-17-04, at the time of issuance of a building permit." The revised final plat should be submitted prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. Page 9 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc • Plat note #8 indicates the subdivision is subject to the terms of a development agreement recorded as instrument number 106057136, records of Ada County, Idaho. The plat note does not address the subsequent modification(s) to the referenced development agreement. The applicant should submit a revised final plat showing plat note #8 modified to read, "All lots are subject to the provisions of the City of Eagle development agreement recorded as instrument#106057136 and any subsequent modification(s)." The revised final plat should be submitted prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. • Plat note #11 indicates that, "all lots within this subdivision shall have access to Linder Road over an existing public right-of-way easement granted to the Ada County Highway District as instrument no. 107018472, records of Ada County, Idaho." Within the Ada County Highway District staff report it is indicated that the access to Eaglefield Estates from Linder Road was provided via Escalante Drive. A portion of Escalante Drive was constructed over an adjacent parcel to Eaglefield Estates which was never final platted and the right-of-way/public use of Escalante Drive was provided by a right-of-way easement. The adjacent property has since been foreclosed and gone back to the bank. Through the foreclosure process, the right-of-way easement for Escalante Drive was relinquished, eliminating public access to the roadway and Eaglefield Estates Subdivision. Site Specific Conditions of Approval #1 within the ACHD staff report indicates that prior to ACHD's signature on the final plat the applicant should provide written documentation that public access to the site has been obtained and will remain to provide access to the site. Standard Condition of Approval No. 1 provided herein states that the applicant shall comply with all requirements of Ada County Highway District. ACRD has plat signing authority and will have to sign the plat prior to the applicant submitting the plat to the City for final signature. Plat note#11 will need to be modified to reflect how access will be provided to the subdivision. The applicant should submit a revised final plat showing plat note #11 modified to address how access is being provided from Linder Road to Eaglefield Estates. The revised final plat should be submitted prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. • Staff has reviewed the particular facts and circumstances of this proposed combined preliminary and final plat and, in terms of Eagle City Code Section 9-2-3(B) "1 thru 5" (minimum criteria to combine a preliminary and final plat), has made the following conclusions: The proposed-combined preliminary and final plat: 1. Does not exceed ten(10) lots; 2. No new street dedication or street widening is involved; 3. No major special development considerations are involved such as development in a floodplain, hillside development or the like. 4. All required information for both preliminary and final plat is complete and in an acceptable form; and 5. The proposed subdivision is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or any provision of the Zoning Title of the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT: Based upon the information provided staff recommends approval of the Combined Preliminary Plat/Final Plat with conditions as provided within the staff report. Page 10 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No 2 pzf.doc PUBLIC HEARING OF THE COMMISSION: A. A public hearing on the application was held before the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 7, 2011, at which time testimony was taken and the public hearing was closed. The Commission made their recommendation at that time. B. Oral testimony in favor of this proposal was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission by no one(not including the applicant/representative). C. Oral testimony in opposition to this proposal was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission by no one. COMMISSIONS DECISION REGARDING THE COMBINED PRELIMINARY PLAT/FINAL PLAT: The Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of the combined preliminary plat/final plat for Eaglefield Estates Subdivision No. 2 with the following staff recommended site specific conditions of approval and standard conditions of approval: SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Comply with all conditions within the development agreement (or as modified) for rezone application RZ-17-04 2. Comply with all requirements of the City Engineer. 3. The applicant shall submit payment to the City for all engineering fees incurred for reviewing this project,prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. (ECC 1-7-4) 4. The applicant shall provide a revised final plat which indicates that the easement width adjacent to the rear lot lines shall be six feet(6')prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. (ECC 9-3-6) 5. The applicant shall submit a revised final plat showing plat note #5 modified to read, "Minimum building setbacks shall be in accordance with the setbacks as set forth in the conditions of development found within the development agreement and subsequent modifications for RZ-17- 04, at the time of issuance of a building permit." The revised final plat shall be submitted prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. (Development Agreement Condition of Development#2.2) 6. The applicant shall submit a revised final plat showing plat note #8 modified to read, "All lots are subject to the provisions of the City of Eagle development agreement recorded as instrument #106057136 and any subsequent modification(s)". The revised final plat shall be submitted prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. (Executed development agreements instrument #106057136 and instrument#109031309) 7. The applicant shall submit a revised final plat showing plat note #11 modified to address how access is being provided from Linder Road to Eaglefield Estates. The revised final plat shall be submitted prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. (ECC 9-4-1-2) STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Ada County Highway District and/or the Idaho Transportation Department, including but not limited to approval of the drainage system, curbs, gutters, streets and sidewalks. 2. Correct street names, as approved by the Ada County Street Name Committee, shall be placed on the plat prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. Page 11 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc 3. Complete water and sewer system construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Required improvements shall include, but not be limited to, extending all utilities to the platted property. The developer may submit a letter in lieu of plans explaining why plans may not be necessary. 4. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare approval of the sewer and water facilities is required prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat(I.C. Title 50, Chapter 13 and I.C. 39-118). 5. Written approval of all well water for any shared or commercial well shall be obtained from the Idaho Department of Water Resources prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. 6. Unless septic tanks are permitted, wet line sewers will be required and the applicant will be required to furnish the City Engineer with a letter from the sewer entity serving the property, accepting the project for service, prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat(B.C.C. 9-20-8.4) 7. All homes being constructed with individual septic systems shall have the septic systems placed on the street side of the home or shall have their sewer drainage system designed with a stub at the house front to allow for future connection to a public sewer system. 8. Per Idaho Code, Section 31-3805, concerning irrigation rights, transfer and disclosure, the water rights appurtenant to the lands in said subdivision which are within the irrigation entity will be transferred from said lands by the owner thereof; or the subdivider shall provide for underground tile or other like satisfactory underground conduit to permit the delivery of water to those landowners within the subdivision who are also within the irrigation entity. See Eagle City Code Section 9-4-1-9(C), which provides overriding and additional specific criteria for pressurized irrigation facilities. Plans showing the delivery system must be approved by a registered professional engineer and shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. 9. The applicant shall submit a letter from the appropriate drainage entity approving the drainage system and/or accepting said drainage; or submit a letter from a registered professional engineer certifying that all drainage shall be retained on-site prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. A copy of the construction drawing(s) shall be submitted with the letter. 10. Drainage system plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. The plans shall show how swales, or drain piping, will be developed in the drainage easements. The approved drainage system shall be constructed, or a performance bond shall be submitted to the City Clerk, prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. The CC&R's shall contain clauses to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney, prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat, requiring that lots be so graded that all runoff runs either over the curb, or to the drainage easement, and that no runoff shall cross any lot line onto another lot except within a drainage easement. 11. No ditch, pipe or other structure or canal, for irrigation water or irrigation waste water owned by an organized irrigation district, canal company, ditch association, or other irrigation entity, shall be obstructed, routed, covered or changed in any way unless such obstruction, rerouting, covering or changing has first been approved in writing by the entity. A Registered Engineer shall certify that any ditch rerouting, piping, covering or otherwise changing the existing irrigation or waste ditch (1) has been made in such a manner that the flow of water will not be impeded or increased beyond carrying capacity of the downstream ditch; (2) will not otherwise injure any person or persons using or interested in such ditch or their property; and(3) satisfied the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction. A copy of such written approval and certification shall be filed with the construction drawing and submitted to the City Engineer prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. Page 12 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzfdoc 12. Encroachments including, but not limited to, landscaping, fencing, lighting, and/or pathways shall not be located within any easement or right-of-way for any ditch, pipe or other structure, or canal used for irrigation water or irrigation waste water without the express written approval of the organized irrigation district, canal company, ditch association, or other irrigation entity associated with such ditch, pipe or other structure, or canal. The applicant shall submit a copy of the written approval from the irrigation entity prior to the City Clerk signing the final plat. 13. Streetlight plans shall be submitted and approved as to the location, height and wattage to the City Engineer prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. All construction shall comply with the City's specifications and standards. The applicant shall delineate on the face of the final plat an easement, acceptable to the City Engineer, for the purpose of installing and maintaining streetlight fixtures, conduit and wiring lying outside any dedicated public right-of-way, prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. The applicant shall pay applicable streetlight inspection fees on the proposed subdivision prior to signing of the final plat by the Eagle City Engineer. 14 The applicant shall provide utility easements as required by the public utility providing service, and as may be required by the Eagle City Code,prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. 15. An approval letter from the Eagle Fire Department shall be submitted to the City prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. The letter shall include the following comments and minimum requirements, and any other items of concern as may be determined by the Eagle Fire Department officials: a. The applicant has made arrangements to comply with all requirements of the Fire Department. b. The proposed fire hydrant locations shall be reviewed and be approved in writing by the Eagle Fire Department prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. c. Minimum flow per hydrant shall be 1,000 gallons per minute for one and two family dwellings, 1,500 gallons per minute for dwellings having a fire area in excess of 3,600 square feet, and 1,500 gallons per minute (i.e.; Commercial, Industrial, Schools, etc.). Flow rates shall be inspected in accordance with all agencies having jurisdiction, and shall be verified in writing by the Eagle Fire Department prior to issuance of any building permits. d. The proposed fire protection system shall be reviewed and approved by the Eagle Fire Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 16. Covenants, homeowner's association by-laws or other similar deed restrictions, acceptable to the Eagle City Attorney which provide for the use, control and mutual maintenance of all common areas, storage facilities, recreational facilities, streetlights or open spaces shall be reviewed and approved by the Eagle City Attorney prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. A restrictive covenant must be recorded and a note on the face of the final plat is required, providing for mutual maintenance and access easements. Appropriate papers describing decision-making procedures relating to the maintenance of structures, grounds and parking areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Eagle City Attorney prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. 17. Should the homeowner's association be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the storm drainage facilities,the covenants and restrictions,homeowner's association by-laws or other similar deed restrictions acceptable to the Eagle City Attorney shall be reviewed and approved by the Page 13 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc Eagle City Attorney prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. 18. The applicant shall submit an application for Design Review, and shall obtain approval for all required landscaping, common area and subdivision signage prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. 19. Any recreation area, greenbelt area or pathway area along the Boise River, Dry Creek or any other area designated by the City Council or Eagle City Pathway/Greenbelt Committee for a path or walkway shall be approved in writing by the Eagle City Pathway/Greenbelt Committee prior to approval of the final plat by the City Council. 20. Conservation, recreation and river access easements (if applicable) shall be approved by the Eagle City Pathway/Greenbelt Committee and shall be shown on the final plat prior to approval of the final plat by the City Council. 21. The applicant shall place a note on the face of the plat which states: "Minimum building setback lines shall be in accordance with the applicable zoning and subdivision regulations at the time of issuance of the building permit or as specifically approved and/or required". 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of the Eagle City Code, pertaining to floodplain and river protection regulations (if applicable)prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. 23. The development shall comply with the Boise River Plan (if applicable) in effect at the time of City Council consideration of the final plat. 24. The applicant shall obtain written approval of the development relative to the effects of the Boise River Flood Plain (if applicable) from the Corps of Engineers prior to approval of the final plat by the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall obtain approval of the development relative to its effects on wetlands or other natural waterways (if applicable) from the Corps of Engineers and the Idaho Department of Water Resources and/or any other agency having jurisdiction prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. 26. Basements in homes in the flood plain are prohibited. 27. The Americans with Disabilities Act, Uniform Building Code, Eagle City Code, Eagle Comprehensive Plan, and all applicable County, State and Federal Codes and Regulations shall be complied with. All design and construction shall be in accordance with all applicable City of Eagle Codes unless specifically approved by the Commission and/or Council. 28. Any changes to the plans and specifications upon which this approval is based, other than those required by the above conditions, will require submittal of an application for modification and approval of that application prior to commencing any change. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest submits application to the City of Eagle for a change to the planned use of the subject property. 29. No public board, agency, commission, official or other authority shall proceed with the construction of or authorize the construction of any of the public improvements required by the Eagle City Code Title 9 "Land Subdivisions" until the final plat has received the approval of the City Council(ECC 9-6-5 (A)(2)). After Council approval of the final plat, the applicant may construct any approved improvements before the City Engineer signs the final plat. The applicant shall provide a financial guarantee of performance in the amount of 150% of the total estimated cost for completing any required Page 14 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc improvements (see resolution 98-3)prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. The financial guarantee shall be a Letter of Credit, Certificate of Deposit, cash deposit or certified check. 30. In accordance with Eagle City Code, failure to obtain a recorded final plat for the subdivision within one year following City Council approval shall cause this approval to be null and void, unless a time extension is granted by the City Council. 31. Prior to submitting the final plat for recording, the following must provide endorsements or certifications: Owners or dedicators, Registered Land Surveyor, County Engineer, Central District Health Department, Ada County Treasurer, Ada County Highway District Commissioners, City Engineer, and City Clerk. 32. The City's actions on the application does not grant the applicant any appropriation of water or interference with existing water rights. The applicant indemnifies and holds the City harmless for any and all water rights, claims in any way associated with this application. 33. The applicant shall submit cut sheets showing streetlighting details for review and approval by the Zoning Administrator prior to the submittal of the final plat. The plans shall show how the streetlights will facilitate the"Dark Sky"concept of lighting. 34. The applicant shall take care to locate and protect from damage existing utilities, pipelines and similar structures. Documentation indicating that "Digline" has performed an inspection of the site shall be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 35. Place a note on the final plat which states in general that surrounding land with farm uses and related activities shall be protected pursuant to the Idaho Right to Farm Act. 36. The applicant shall install at the entrance to the subdivision a 4' x 4' plywood or other hard surface sign (mounted on two 4"x 4" posts with the bottom of the sign being a minimum of 3-feet above the ground)noticing the contractors to clean up daily, no loud music, and no dogs off leash. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. A Neighborhood Meeting was held at 6:00 PM, Wednesday, November 10, 2010, at the Eagle City Hall (Freedom Room) located at 660 E. Civic Lane, in compliance with the application submittal requirement of Eagle City Code. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on December 3, 2010. 2. Notice of Public Hearing on the application for the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission was published in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and the Eagle City Code on January 17, 2011. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners within three- hundred feet (300-feet) of the subject property in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and Eagle City Code on January 14, 2011. Requests for agencies' reviews were transmitted December 10, 2010, in accordance with the requirements of the Eagle City Code. The site was posted in accordance with the Eagle City Code January 28, 2011. 3. The Commission reviewed the particular facts and circumstances of this proposed combined preliminary and final plat (PP/FP-02-10) and, in terms of Eagle City Code Section 9-2-3(B) "1 thru 5" (minimum criteria to combine a preliminary and final plat), has made the following conclusions: The proposed combined preliminary and final plat: 1. Does not exceed ten(10) lots; 2. No new street dedication or street widening is involved; Page 15 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzfdoc 3. No major special development considerations are involved such as development in a floodplain, hillside development or the like. 4. All required information for both preliminary and final plat is complete and in an acceptable form; and 5. The proposed subdivision is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or any provision of the Zoning Title of the City. DATED this 28th day of February, 2011. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THE CITY OF EAGLE C13' .As County:Idaho ,� • A Derek'Smith, Chairman ,,..,""""''1.. ,. • �l O F E,l ri .(C .•••.....i'•/4.ATTEST: �- LO R .• O . T. - - _ L- Sharon . Bergmann, Eagle City C •rk :.t(. S E A L q ,,-/o . ''',1?,r O I .... ,, , ;",,, Page 16 of 16 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\SUBS\2010\Eaglefield Estates No.2 pzf.doc