Loading...
Findings - PZ - 2009 - A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 - Rz From Rut To Re-Da/5 Acre/1980 & 1984 W. Floating Feather Rd BEFORE THE EAGLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION ]~ FOR AN ANNEXATION AND REZONE ]I FROM RUT (RURAL-URBAN TRANSITION) ]I TO R-E-DA (RESIDENTIAL-ESTATES ]I WITH A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT) ) FOR CLARENCE AND CAROLYN STOCKSTILL ]I FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CASE NUMBER A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 The above-entitled annexation and rezone applications came before the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation on July 20, 2009, at which time public testimony was taken and the public hearing was closed. The Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; FINDINGS OF FACT: A. PROJECT SUMMARY: Clarence and Carolyn Stockstill represented by Karla Williams with MarKar Custom Homes, LLC, are requesting approval of an annexation and rezone from RUT (Rural- Urban Transition-Ada County Designation) to R-E-DA (Residential-Estates up to one unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement). The 5.00-acre site is generally located on the north side of W. Floating Feather Road approximately 220 feet east of N. Ballantyne Lane at 1980 and 1984 W. Floating Feather Road. B. APPLICA TION SUBMITTAL: A Neighborhood Meeting was held at 6:30 PM, on Thursday, May 21, 2009, on site in compliance with the application submittal requirement of Eagle City Code. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on June 4, 2009. C. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice of Public Hearing on the application for the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission was published in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and the Eagle City Code on June 29, 2009. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners within three-hundred feet (300-feet) of the subject property in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and Eagle City Code on June 29, 2009. The site was posted in accordance with the Eagle City Code on July 9, 2009. Requests for agencies' reviews were transmitted on June 15, 2009, in accordance with the requirements ofthe Eagle City Code. D. HISTORY OF RELEVANT PREVIOUS ACTIONS: None E. COMPANION APPLICATIONS: Parcel Division, File # PD-02-09 Page 1 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A\2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf Stockstill. doc F. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AND ZONING MAP DESIGNATIONS: COMPPLAN ZONING LAND USE DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Existing Residential Estates (up to RUT (Rural-Urban Transition Single-family one (1) dwelling unit per - Ada County designation) dwellings/pasture two (2) acres maximum) Proposed No Change R-E-DA (Residential-Estates Two (2) - Single-family up to one (1) unit per two (2) dwellings acres with a development Future parcel division agreement) North of site Residential Estates (up to R-E (Residential-Estates up to Residential (Oakley Estates one (1) dwelling unit per one (1) unit per two (2) Subdivision) two (2) acres maximum) acres) South of site Residential One (up to one R-l (Residential- up to one Residential (Lockwood (1) dwelling unit per one unit per one (1) acre) Subdivision) (1) acre maximum) East of site Residential Estates (up to R-E (Residential-Estates up to Single-family dwelling one (1) dwelling unit per one (1) unit per two (2) two (2) acres maximum) acres) West of site Residential Estates (up to R-E (Residential-Estates up to Residential (Oakley Estates one (1) dwelling unit per one (1) unit per two (2) Subdivision) two (2) acres maximum) acres) G. DESIGN REVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICT: Not located within the DDA, TDA, CEDA, or DSDA. H. TOTAL ACREAGE OF SITE: +/- 5-acres 1. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REZONE: See attached justification letter date stamped by the City on June 4, 2009, provided by the applicant. J. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: See attached justification letter date stamped by the City on June 4, 2009, provided by the applicant. K. A V AILABILITY AND ADEQUACY OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES: The two (2) existing homes on the site are served by individual well and septic systems. The property has frontage to W. Floating Feather Road as well as W. Janet Court. The narrative provided by the applicant and date stamped by the City on June 4, 2009, indicated that Eagle Sewer District as well as United Water of Idaho both have service lines located adjacent to Floating Feather Road. United Water ofIdaho also has a service Page 2 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A\2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf Stockstill.doc line located adjacent to W. Janet Court. L. PUBLIC USES SHOWN ON FUTURE ACQUISITIONS MAP: No map currently exists M. SPECIAL ON-SITE FEATURES: Areas of Critical Environmental Concern - No Evidence of Erosion - No Fish Habitat - Yes - private pond is stocked with fish Floodplain - No Mature Trees - Yes - in proximity to the existing dwellings and the driveway access to W. Floating Feather Road Riparian Vegetation - No Steep Slopes - No Stream/Creek - No Unique Animal Life - Unknown Unique Plant Life - Unknown Unstable Soils - Unknown Wildlife Habitat - Unknown N. NON-CONFORMING USES: There are currently two (2) residences, one (1) detached shop, and two (2) covered corrals located on the property. The request for annexation and rezone is to facilitate a future parcel division so the existing residences may be located on separate parcels. The applicant submitted a parcel division application (PD-02-09) which shows the shop located adjacent to the residence in proximity to W. Floating Feather Road to be located within the rear yard setback should the parcel division be approved. The covered corrals on the site will also be located within the respective rear yard setbacks should the parcel division be approved. O. AGENCY RESPONSES: The following agencies have responded and their correspondence is attached. Comments, which appear to be of special concern, are noted below: Ada County Highway District - Approving a "Driveway Approach Request ", to Janet Court for the residence located at 1984 Floating Feather Road. Ada County Highway District - Provided site specific conditions of approval the District may require when it reviews afuture development application. Central District Health Department - No objections to the proposal Chevron Pipeline - No conflicts with the pipeline Eagle Fire Department - No opposition to the annexation and rezone applications. Idaho Transportation Department - No comment Department of Environmental Quality - Recommends verifYing that there is adequate water and sewer to serve the project. Ringert Clark (representing Drainage District No.2) - Indicated that a drainage ditch and easement runs through or abuts the property. The correspondence also indicated required easement size and steps that may be taken prior to approval of any encroachments, change of easement or drainage discharge into the District's facilities occurs. Page 3 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A\2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf Stockstil1.doc P. LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC: None received to date. STAFF ANALYSIS PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT: A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS, WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: · The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (adopted 11-27-07) designates this site as: Residential Estates Suitable primarily for single family residential development on acreages may be in transition from agricultural to residential use or may combine small scale agricultural uses with residential uses. An allowable density of up to 1 unit per 2 acres. B. ZONING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS, WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: · Eagle City Code Section 8-1-2 defines Easement as: Authorization by a property owner for the use by another, and for a specified purpose, of any designated part of his property. · Eagle City Code Section 8-1-2 defines Nonconforming Use as: A building, structure or use of land existing at the time of enactment of this title, and which does not conform to the regulations of the district in which it is situated. · Eagle City Code Section 8-1-2 defines Setback Line as: A line established by this title, generally parallel with and measured from the lot line, defining the limits of a yard in which no building or structure may be located aboveground except as may be provided herein. · Eagle City Code Section 8-2-4 Schedule of Building Height and Lot Area Regulations: Official Height and Area Regulations Zoning District Maximum Height IFrontlIReM! m~ior Side 1~~120' Street Side Maximum Lot Covered Minimum Lot Area Minimum (Acres Or Sq. Ft.) G Lot And H* Width I* 111.8 acres 11100' IR-E 1135' 1135' 1[20% · Eagle City Code Section 8-3-5: Unique Land Uses: Certain unique land uses pose special problems that may have detrimental influences on surrounding land uses. The following performance standards for such unique land uses shall be adhered to in addition to all other provisions of this title: A. Accessory Building: 3. Accessory buildings one hundred twenty (120) square feet in area or larger shall comply with the minimum setbacks as required in section 8-2-4 of this title and shall be limited to a maximum height of twenty five feet (25'). Page 4 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A\2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf Stockstill.doc C. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL: (None) D. DISCUSSION: · The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates this site as Residential Estates (up to one dwelling unit per two acres). The applicant is requesting annexation and rezone to R-E-DA (Residential-Estates - up to one (1) dwelling unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement) to facilitate a future parcel division. The property is an enclave surrounded by property located within the corporate limits of the city. The applicant has also submitted a Parcel Division application to divide the +/- five (5)- acre site into two (2) parcels, which are no less than 2.52-acres each. With the proposed parcel division, staff believes the character of the area will not be changed since the proposed parcel configuration is compatible to the surrounding development. The maximum overall density of the project will not exceed .40-units per acre. · The applicant provided correspondence, date stamped by the City on June 4, 2009, requesting a development agreement to address several items one of which is regarding structures that do not meet the city setback requirements. The applicant is requesting that the setbacks for the existing structures located on the site be accepted and documented as approved as part of this application. The required rear setback in the R-E (Residential Estates one unit per two acres) zone is thirty feet (30') in width. The Parcel Division Site Plan, date stamped by the City on June 4, 2009, shows the proposed new property line dividing the property into two (2) separate parcels and bisecting the property from east to west. The Parcel Division Site Plan shows three (3) structures located within the proposed rear setbacks for both Parcel A and Parcel B. Parcel A shows a covered corral located approximately 6.04 feet from the proposed rear property line. Parcel B shows a shop located approximately 5.32 feet from the proposed rear property line and a covered corral located 1.7 feet from the proposed rear property line. The Parcel Division Site Plan shows the proposed new property line dividing the property into two (2) separate parcels and bisecting the property from east to west. The proposed line is straight in alignment with the northern and southern boundary lines. The applicant should submit a revised Parcel Division Site Plan showing the proposed new property line located approximately 28.3 feet further north of its current location at the western property line then shift to the south approximately twenty-four feet (24') in length east of the area labeled raised bed and continue east from that point to the eastern property line. Should the aforementioned property line be delineated as part of the parcel division approval all the structures would then meet the required setbacks for the R-E (Residential Estates one unit per two acres) zone. The applicant should provide a revised site plan showing all structures to be located outside of the required setbacks for the R-E (Residential Estates one unit per two acres) zone. · The applicant's request for a development agreement also addresses the two (2) existing wells serving the two (2) existing residences located on the property. The narrative date stamped by the City on June 4, 2009, indicated that the applicant spoke with Robert Jensen with United Water of Idaho and Mr. Jensen indicated there is a twelve inch (12") water line on the north side of West Floating Feather Road and also a water line located adjacent to West Janet Court north of the subject property. The Page 5 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A\2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf Stockstill. doc applicant is requesting that the existing residences continue the use of the existing wells until such time the well fails, should the well fail at the time the applicant would be required to connect to a central potable water system. · The applicant provided a narrative date stamped by the City on June 4, 2009, which indicated that the property is located within the boundaries of the Eagle Sewer District. Lynn Moser with Eagle Sewer District confirmed to the applicant that a sewer line is located approximately eleven feet (11') deep adjacent to West Floating Feather Road. Mr. Moser also confirmed that there is not a sewer line adjacent to West Janet Court. The applicant is requesting that both homes be allowed to remain on the existing septic systems and should the septic system fail on Parcel A (shown on the site plan) that the owner be allowed to replace the existing septic system. Should the septic system fail on Parcel B (shown on the site plan) the applicant should be required to connect to central sewer. · Ringert Law, representing Drainage District No. 2 provided correspondence date stamped by the City on July 8, 2009, which indicated that Drainage District No.2 has a drainage ditch and easement that runs through or abuts this property. Staff contacted S. Bryce Farris with Ringert Law and determined the District has a drainage ditch located on the north side of West Floating Feather Road. The drainage ditch located on the Stockstill property has been tiled and is located under the existing asphalt pathway. Staff will address the Drainage District NO.2 easement concerns during the parcel division approval process. · Ada County Highway District provided correspondence date stamped by the City on July 9, 2009, which indicated the frontage along Floating Feather Road abutting the site is part of the Vehicle Registration Fee (VERVE) sidewalk project currently being designed to connect the existing sidewalk located at the west property line and continue across the site's frontage east to the existing sidewalk constructed as part of Corrente Bello Subdivision. Currently the right-of-way is twenty-three feet (23') in width as measured from centerline abutting the site for Floating Feather Road. ACHD is requesting a total of thirty-five feet (35') in width as measured from centerline be dedicated for future right-of-way to facilitate the sidewalk project. This request will require the applicant to dedicate an additional twelve feet (12') in width of easement to allow for the sidewalk project to move forward. Ada County Highway District will be replacing the existing pathway with a new sidewalk, at no expense to the applicant. The applicant should provide a legal description and exhibit dedicating a sidewalk easement twelve feet (12') in width adjacent to West Floating Feather Road to ACHD, record the dedication with the Ada County Recorder, and reference the instrument number of the recorded document on the Parcel Division Record of Survey prior to the City Clerk signing the Parcel Division Record of Survey. The applicant should provide a legal description and exhibit establishing utility easements twelve feet (12') in width located adjacent to the sidewalk easement on W. Floating Feather Road and also the W. Janet Court right-of-way, record the easements with the Ada County Recorder, and reference the instrument number of the recorded document on the Parcel Division Record of Survey prior to the City Clerk signing the Parcel Division Record of Survey. STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROVIDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT: Page 6 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A\2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf Stockstill.doc Based upon the information provided to staff to date, staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and rezone from RUT (Rural-Urban Transition - Ada County Designation) to R- E-DA (Residential-Estates one unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement) with the following conditions to be placed within a development agreement: 3.1 The development shall not exceed one (1) unit per two (2) acres. 3.2 Applicant will develop the Property subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in this Development Agreement. Further, Applicant will submit such applications regarding a parcel division, design review, preliminary and final plat reviews, and/or any conditional use permits, if applicable, and any other applicable applications as may be required by the Eagle City Code, which shall comply with the Eagle City Code, as it exists at the time such applications are made except as otherwise provided within this Agreement. 3.3 The Concept Plan (Exhibit B) represents the Owner's current concept for completion of the project. As the Concept Plan evolves, the City understands and agrees that certain changes in that concept may occur. If the City determines that any such changes require additional public comment due to potential impacts on surrounding property or the community, a public hearing shall be held on any proposed changes in the Concept Plan, notice shall be provided as may be required by the City. 3.4 The applicant shall provide a revised site plan showing all structures to be located outside of the required setbacks of the R-E (Residential Estates one unit per two acres) zone. 3.5 The existing homes may continue the use of the existing potable wells and septic systems, however the applicant shall provide a stub-out for central water and sewer service to the existing home located on Parcel B for connecting to central services in the event that either the well or septic system fail. The applicant shall provide a stub-out for central water to the existing home on Parcel A, for connecting to central water in the event the potable well fails. The stub-out lines shall be provided prior to the City Clerk signing the parcel division record of survey. 3.6 Upon failure of a potable well the owner of the residential dwelling shall be required to connect the respective residential dwelling to a central potable water system. 3.7 Applicant shall provide a legal description and exhibit dedicating a sidewalk easement twelve feet (12') in width adjacent to West Floating Feather Road to ACHD, record the dedication with the Ada County Recorder, and reference the instrument number of the recorded document on the Parcel Division Record of Survey prior to the City Clerk signing the Parcel Division Record of Survey. 3.8 Applicant shall provide a legal description and exhibit establishing utility easements twelve feet (12') in width located adjacent to the aforementioned sidewalk easement on W. Floating Feather Road and adjacent to the W. Janet Court right-of-way, record the easements with the Ada County Recorder, and reference the instrument number of the recorded document on the Parcel Division Record of Survey prior to the City Clerk signing the Parcel Division Record of Survey. PUBLIC HEARING OF THE COMMISSION: Page 7 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A \2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf Stockstill,doc A. A public hearing on the application was held before the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 20, 2009, at which time testimony was taken and the public hearing was closed. The Commission made their recommendation at that time. B. Oral testimony in favor of this proposal was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission by no one (other than the applicant/representative). C. Oral testimony in opposition to this proposal was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission by no one. COMMISSION DECISION: The Commission voted 4 to 0 (Smith absent) to recommend approval of A-06-09 and RZ-07-09 for an annexation and rezone from RUT (Rural-Urban Transition) to R-E-DA (Residential-Estates - up to one (1) dwelling unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement) for Clarence and Carolyn Stockstill with the following staff recommended conditions to be placed within a development agreement, with underline text to be added by the Commission and strikethrough text to be deleted by the Commission: 3.1 The development shall not exceed one (1) unit per two (2) acres. 3.2 Applicant will develop the Property subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in this Development Agreement. Further, Applicant will submit such applications regarding a parcel division, design review, preliminary and final plat reviews, and/or any conditional use permits, if applicable, and any other applicable applications as may be required by the Eagle City Code, which shall comply with the Eagle City Code, as it exists at the time such applications are made except as otherwise provided within this Agreement. 3.3 The Concept Plan (Exhibit B) represents the Owner's current concept for completion of the project. As the Concept Plan evolves, the City understands and agrees that certain changes in that concept may occur. If the City determines that any such changes require additional public comment due to potential impacts on surrounding property or the community, a public hearing shall be held on any proposed changes in the Concept Plan, notice shall be provided as may be required by the City. 3.4 The applieaet shall proviae a revised site pIae showing all strnehIres to be loeated outside of the required setbaeks of the R E (Residential Estates 0Re I:lRit per two aeres) Z0Re. All structures currently existing on the site. as of June 4. 2009. are recognized as thev are in their respective locations and which mav or mav not complv with the required minimum setback requirements of the R-E zoning district as prescribed in Eagle City Code. This recognition does not permit any further encroachments into said setbacks. No further development shall be permitted. nor any building permits issued. until such time as a Parcel Division. or subdivision. is approved and recorded at the Ada County Recorder. Anv Parcel Division. or subdivision. shall comply in all respects with Eagle City Code. 3.5 The existing homes may continue the use of the existing potable wells and septic systems, however the applicant shall provide a stub-out for central water and sewer service to the existing home located OR Pareel Bat 1980 Floating Feather Road for connecting to central services in the event that either the well or septic system fail. The applicant shall provide a stub-out for central water to the existing home OR Pareel /\ at 1984 Floating Feather Road, for connecting to central water in the event the potable well fails. The stub-out lines shall be Page 8 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A\2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzfStockstill.doc provided prior to the City Clerk signing the parcel division record of survey. 3.6 Upon failure of a the potable well for either residential dwelling, the owner of the residential dwelling shall be required to connect the respective residential dwelling to a central potable water system. 3.7 Applicant shall provide a legal description and exhibit dedicating a sidewalk easement twelve feet (12') in width adjacent to West Floating Feather Road to ACHD, record the dedication with the Ada County Recorder, and reference the instrument number of the recorded document on the Parcel Division Record of Survey prior to the City Clerk signing the Parcel Division Record of Survey. 3.8 Applicant shall provide a legal description and exhibit establishing utility easements twelve feet (12') in width located adjacent to the aforementioned sidewalk easement on W. Floating Feather Road and adjacent to the W. Janet Court right-of-way, record the easements with the Ada County Recorder, and reference the instrument number of the recorded document on the Parcel Division Record of Survey prior to the City Clerk signing the Parcel Division Record of Survey. 3.9 Subiect to the approval of the Idaho Department of Water Resources, the owner of the dwelling located at 1984 Floating Feather Road may continue to utilize a well onlv for the heat pump heating and cooling svstem serving the dwelling and after connecting to central potable water services. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. A Neighborhood Meeting was held at 6:30 PM, on Thursday, May 21,2009, on site in compliance with the application submittal requirement of Eagle City Code. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on June 4, 2009. 2. Notice of Public Hearing on the application for the Eagle Planning and Zoning Commission was published in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and the Eagle City Code on June 29, 2009. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to property owners within three-hundred feet (300-feet) of the subject property in accordance with the requirements of Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code and Eagle City Code on June 29, 2009. The site was posted in accordance with the Eagle City Code on July 9, 2009. Requests for agencies' reviews were transmitted on June 15,2009, in accordance with the requirements of the Eagle City Code. 3. The Commission reviewed the particular facts and circumstances of this proposed rezone (RZ-07- 09) with regard to Eagle City Code Section 8-7-5 "Action by the Commission and Council", and based upon the information provided concludes that the proposed rezone is in accordance with the City of Eagle Comprehensive Plan and established goals and objectives because: a. The requested zoning designation of R-E-DA (Residential-Estates up to one (1) unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement) is consistent with the land use designation as shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map; b. The information provided from the agencies having jurisdiction over the public facilities needed for this site indicate that adequate public facilities exist, or are expected to be provided, to serve all uses allowed on this property under the proposed zone; c. The proposed R-E-DA (Residential-Estates up to one (1) unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement) is compatible with the R-E (Residential-Estates up to one (1) Page 9 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A \2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf StockstilL doc unit per two (2) acres) zone and land use to the north since that area is developed with lot sizes and single-family dwellings in a manner similar to those that exist on the subject parcel, and; d. The proposed R-E-DA (Residential-Estates up to one (1) unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement) is compatible with the R-l (Residential - up to one (1) unit per one (1) acre) zone and land use to the south since that area is buffered from this site by a minor arterial roadway, a canal, landscaping, and open areas, and; e. The proposed R-E-DA (Residential-Estates up to one (1) unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement) is compatible with the R-E (Residential-Estates up to one (1) unit per two (2) acres) zone and land use to the west since that area is developed with a single-family dwelling on a parcel sized in a manner similar to those that exist on the subject parcel, and; f. The proposed R-E-DA (Residential-Estates up to one (1) unit per two (2) acres with a development agreement) is compatible with the R-E (Residential-Estates up to one (1) unit per two (2) acres) zone and land use to the east since that area is developed with single-family dwellings and parcels sized in a manner similar to that existing on the subject parcel, and; g. The land proposed for rezone is not located within a "Hazard Area" and "Special Area" as described within the Comprehensive Plan, and; h. No non-conforming uses are expected to be created with this rezone if the conditions to be placed within the development agreement are achieved. The annexation and rezoning of this property will facilitate the opportunity to lessen the non-conformity of the property through the application and approval of an abiding Parcel Division or subdivision. DATED this 3rd day of August 2009. ............, ", "- ", -' OF EA 0 -" ..'" <\ ~ ........ <. ~ ". ...:' '..- ....~. ...... )'~... ~ . . . . * : : * : _.- : , AL. .. SE _:,__ /n..~' .-:-.'~:..'-'~ J'">. ...o~POR'l\'\. '- " ....... ."........ 1 - , ~ r.,.. (1 \: ' ". Page 10 of 10 K:\Planning Dept\Eagle Applications\RZ&A\2009\A-06-09 & RZ-07-09 pzf Stockstill. doc