Findings - DR - 2008 - DR-08-08 - 2 Building Wall Signs
BEFORE THE EAGLE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR )
A DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO BUILDING )
WALL SIGNS FOR DR. JACOB BROWN )
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CASE NUMBER DR-08-08
The above-entitled design review application came before the Eagle Design Review Board for their action
on March 13, 200S. The Eagle Design Review Board having heard and taken oral and written testimony,
and having duly considered the matter, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law;
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. PROJECT SUMMARY:
Dr. Jacob Brown, represented by Sue Cook with Sue Cook Design, is requesting design review
approval to construct two (2) building wall signs for the Castlebury Dental Office Building. The
0.62-acre site is located on the northwest corner of West Chinden Boulevard (SH 20/26) and North
Meridian Road at 661S North Meridian Road (within Castlebury West Business Park).
B. APPLICA TION SUBMITTAL:
The City of Eagle received the application for this item on January IS, 200S.
C. HISTORY OF RELEVANT PREVIOUS ACTIONS: None
D. COMPANION APPLICATIONS:
DR-07-0S (Design Review application for the Castlebury Dental Office Building).
E. ZONING DESIGNATION: MU-DA (Mixed Use with a development agreement)
F. SIGNAGE:
Si n Data
Wall Sign Dimensions
(South elevation
R uired
S' high x 12' wide
Wall sign dimensions are not regulated
by City Code, but must fall within the
maximum area of signage allowed on
the buildin face.
Area ofS. na e
illumination
The wall signs are not proposed to be Interior-illumination prohibited
illuminated.
Page 1 of5
K:\Planning DeptlEagle Appllcatlons\Dr\2008\DR-08-08 Ca,tlebury Dental ,Ign drf.doc
Si n Data
Wall Sign Dimensions
S' high x 12' wide
Re uired
Wall sign dimensions are not regulated
by City Code, but must fall within the
maximum area of signage allowed on
the build in face.
77-s uare feet (maximum)
The wall signs are not proposed to be Interior-illumination prohibited
illuminated.
Area of Si na e
IDumination
G. SIGN MATERIALS:
Backplate: 1-l/2"-thick HDF with Epox bronze finish.
Letters/logo: l"-deep LuminOre, brass finished HDF.
H. AGENCY RESPONSES: None
I. LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC: None received to date
ST AFF ANALYSIS:
A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS, WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING
THIS PROPOSAL:
. 2007 City of Eagle Comprehensive Plan Section 12.4
Protect and enhance the small town character of the City by requiring signage which is
creative and distinctive, compatible with its surroundings, and an integral component of the
style and character of the building to which it relates.
B. ZONING CODE PROVISIONS WHICH ARE OF SPECIAL CONCERN REGARDING THIS
PROPOSAL:
. Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-2(B)
The general theme of the Design Review Overlay District is to specify desirable building and
landscape architectural styles and materials to create a sustainable and pleasing environment
for residents and visitors alike. The architectural designs, materials, and graphics set forth in
this article are complied to create a theme unique to the area called "Eagle Architecture".
. Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-6(A)(4)
Signage for any project shall provide for business identification and minimize clutter and
confusion on and off the site.
. Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-6(A)(4)(c)
Signs are to provide effective and necessary business identification systems adapted to the
building design.
. Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-6(A)(4)(e)
The size, location, design, color, texture, lighting, landscaping, and hours of operations of all
permanent signs and outdoor advertising structures or features to insure that any such
proposals do not detract from the function of, or design of, buildings, structures, surrounding
Page 2 of 5
KlPlanning DeptlEagle Application,\Dr\2008\DR-08-08 Ca,tlebury Dental ,ign drf.doc
properties, neighborhoods, or streets.
. Eagle City Code Section 8-2A.8(C)(l)
Sign materials and overall appearance shall compliment the building architecture and colors as
determined by the Design Review Board.
. Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-8(C)(4)(c)
The total area of any wall sign attached parallel to, or painted on the face of a building shall
not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total are of the building face to which it is attached.
. Eagle City Code Section 8-2A-8(K)(1)
No signs shall be erected or maintained in any district as established by the Zoning Ordinance
except those signs specifically enumerated in this Chapter. The number and area of signs as
outlined in this Chapter are intended to be maximum standards which do not necessarily
ensure architectural compatibility. Therefore, in addition to the enumerated standards,
consideration shall be given to a sign's relationship to the overall appearance of the subject
property as well as the surrounding community. Compatible design, simplicity and sign
effectiveness are to be used in establishing guidelines for sign approval.
C. DISCUSSION:
. The applicant is proposing two (2) non-illuminated building wall signs on the south and east
elevations of the Castlebury Dental Office Building in the Castlebury West Business Park. Both
signs are proposed to be five feet (S') tall and twelve feet (12') wide, constructed with a 1-112"-
thick bronze finish backplate consisting of 1 "-deep brass finish lettering.
. Staff defers further comment regarding design and color of the proposed signs to the Design
Review Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION PROVIDED WITHIN THE REPORT:
Based upon the information provided to staff to date, staff recommends approval with the site
specific conditions of approval and the standard conditions of approval provided within the staff
report.
PUBLIC MEETING OF THE BOARD:
A. A meeting was held on the application before the Design Review Board on March 13, 2008, at which
time the Board made their decision.
B. Oral testimony in opposition to this proposal was presented to the Design Review Board by no one.
C. Oral testimony in favor of this proposal was presented to the Design Review Board by no one (not
including the applicant/representative).
BOARD DECISION:
The Board voted S to 0 (McCullough and Barnes absent) to approve DR-08-08 for a design review
application for two building wall signs for Dr. Jacob Brown, with the following staff
recommended site specific conditions of approval and standard conditions of approval.
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Interior illumination is not permitted for building wall signs.
2. A sign permit is required prior to a sign being constructed on this site.
Page 3 of 5
K:\Planning DeptlEagle Application,\Dr\2008\DR-08-08 Castlebury Dental ,ign drf.doc
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
I. A building permit/zoning permit shaD be required prior to construction of any sign which is not
attached to a building with an active building permit.
2. Approval shall expire without notice to the applicant on the date of expiration of this Design Review,
as stipulated in Eagle City Code (one year from the City Council approval date).
3. The Americans with Disabilities Act, Uniform Building Code, Eagle City Code, and all applicable
County, State and Federal Codes and Regulations shall be complied with. All design and construction
shall be in accordance with all applicable City of Eagle Codes unless specifically approved by the City
Council.
4. New plans which incorporate any required changes shall be submitted for staff approval. Staffmay
elect to take those plans to the Design Review Board and the City Council for review and approval.
S. Any changes to the plans and specifications upon which this approval is based, other than those
required by the above conditions, will require submittal of an application for modification and
approval of that application prior to commencing any change.
6. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application,
shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory
and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the City of
Eagle of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said
requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is
sought.
7. Any modification of the approved design review plans must be approved prior to
construction/installation of such changes. Failure to do so may result in the requirement to modify the
project to comply with the approved design review and/or result in the inability to issue a certificate of
completion for this project.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1. The application for this item was received by the City of Eagle on January IS, 200S.
2. The Board reviewed the particular facts and circumstances of this proposed design review application
(DR-OS-OS) with regard to the Eagle City Code Title S, Chapter 2, Article A, DR Design Review
Overlay District, and based upon the information provided with the conditions required herein,
concludes that the proposed design review application is in accordance with the Eagle City Code and
the Eagle Comprehensive Plan.
Page 4 of 5
K\Planning DeptlEagle Application,\Dr\2008\DR-08-08 Castlebury Dental ,ign drf.doc
DA TED this 27th day of March 200S.
,........,. "'-,
"" -t'Y OF ....
", c\ ......./J"'I ".
~. -.. 0 ......
:. CORPO.t ... ~ '-;.
: '1,^.~~
: tro\ :
. . .
\~~SEAL }*:
':. ., .
~ ~ 'ATEll\~~..
ilOilO", .,.~ ...... \0
ilO"OPIDF'-\
""".,,,,,,. . '
ATf~~~ fb:./>>A '[)efY-t -ty CJ 4r
Sharon K. Bergmann, Eagle City Clerk
Page 5 of5
K\Planning DeptlEagle Applicatlon,\Dr\2008\DR-08-08 Castlebury Dental ,ign drfdoc
CJvttL