Minutes - 2006 - City Council - 11/28/2006 - Regular
./
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
Minutes
November 28, 2006
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA: 6:30 o.m. - 7:30 o.m.
1. 20/26 Corridor Studv - COMPASS Charles Trainer (30 min.)
Charles Trainer, Compass, distributes a copy of his Power Point Presentation and proceeds with
the presentation for the Council. General discussion on the presentation and roadways and
traffic through the City of Eagle.
2. Bob Banks with United Wav of Treasure ValIev will present information on the
orooosed Communitv Detoxification Center. (30 min)
Bob Banks, I am from Eagle, I live in Lexington Hills, provides the Council an overview of the
proposed Community Detoxification Center and provides a status report of where the project
stands to date. The project is asking for assistance from the City of Eagle.
Mayor: Mayor Bieter has asked the City for money and wants the cities to look at the census and
contribute $1.00 per head which would be $13,000.00.
General Council discussion.
Bastian makes a motion but is reminded that we need to be in regular session to make a motion.
Council member Guerber congratulates Charles Trainer on his Idaho Smart Growth A ward.
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA: 7:30 o.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor calls the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: BASTIAN, GUERBER, NORDSTROM, BANDY. All present. A quorum is
present.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. PUBLIC COMMENT:
A. Presentation by Eagle Kiwanis.
Heather Paradis, Chairman of Eagle Kiwanis Golf Tournament, I am here to present a check to
the City of Eagle for half of the proceeds from that tournament in the amount of $3,950.00. This
is the largest fund raiser for our club and now we will be able to proceed with our scholarship
fund.
Council Member Guerber: This money will go into the Eagle Community Fund.
Joann Hill, 2185 Syringa, I would like to put another dwelling on this property for myself. My
daughter and her husband have been living with me because my health has been in decline. I
really do need to have somebody close. I don't know how to go about this. I can live by myself
but I can't drive any more. Show plats of the property to the Mayor and Council showing where
her property and home are. I don't want to subdivide the property at this time.
Bill Vaughan: We have talked about the provisions of a lot split.
Bastian: In a hardship case like this we could waive fees. I think if we put a pennanent structure
we would have to follow the rules of the City. I would suggest you place a mobile home
conditionally and once you move away from the property or are deceased then mobile home
Page 1
K:\COUNCILIMINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work AreaICC-11-28-06min.doc
would be removed. If you want a lot split you will have to go through the processes of the City.
I think the appropriate thing to do is to refer this to staff.
Further discussion.
Bastian moves to amend the Agenda to add the proposed Community Detoxification Center
as Item #6A and the current A will be B. Seconded by Bandy. ALL AYES: MOTION
<:ARRIES......
S. CONSENT AGENDA:
· Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless the Mayor, a
Councilmember, member of City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be removed
from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the Consent Agenda
will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined by the City Council.
· Any item on the Consent Agenda which contains written Conditions of Approval
from the City of Eagle City Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission, or Design
Review Board shall be adopted as part of the City Council's Consent Agenda
approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Claims Against the City.
Guerber moves to approve the Consent Agenda. Seconded by Nordstrom. Bastian: AYE;
Guerber: AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES................. ...
6. PROCLAMATIONS & RESOLUTIONS:
A. Community Detoxification Center:
Bastian moves to support in concept the proposed Community Detoxification Center and
the annual operation with a contribution to be determined later by the City. Seconded by
Nordstrom. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES......
B.~ Resolution 06-54: A Resolution Of The Mayor And City Council If Eagle, Idaho
Detennining A Certain Area Within The City To Be A Deteriorated Or Deteriorating Area As
Defined By Idaho Code Sections SO-20 IS(9) And SO-2903(S); Directing The Urban Renewal
Agency Of Eagle To Commence And Complete The Preparation Of An Urban Renewal Plan,
Which Plan May Include Revenue Allocation Provisions, For All Or Part Of The Area; And
Providing An Effective Date. (Harlan Mann & B. Verschuren)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Planner Verschuren: Provides Council an overview the process for Urban Renewal and
discusses the proposed resolution.
Harlan Mann, provides Council an update of the process of the first Urban Renewal District and
provides Council an overview of the proposed new Urban Renewal District. Discussion on the
appointment of the Board Members and their duties and responsibilities. General discussion.
Ryan Armbruster, discusses the appointment of the Board Members, their duties and
responsibilities. They need to make a commitment to meet at least once a month. General
discussion.
Teri Bath, this is a lot of infonnation, the more I talk to these gentlemen and the more I talk to
Bill it is making more sense. Discussion on the names on the proposed list of members on the
Board. Teri will bring back some more names and try to get a little more diversity.
Page 2
K.\COUNCILlMlNUTES\Temporary Minutes Work AreaI.CC.II-28-06min,doc
Nordstrom moves to approve Resolution 06-54, A Resolution Of The Mayor And City
Council If Eagle, Idaho Determining A Certain Area Within The City To Be A
Deteriorated Or Deteriorating Area As Defined By Idaho Code Sections 50-2018(9) And 50-
2903(8); Directing The Urban Renewal Agency Of Eagle To Commence And Complete The
Preparation Of An Urban Renewal Plan, Which Plan May Include Revenue Allocation
Provisions, For All Or Part Of The Area; And Providing An Effective Date. Seconded by
Bandy. Discussion. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES............
Further Council discussion on urban renewal.
7. FINAL PLATS: None
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
Mayor calls a recess at 8:50 p.m.
Mayor reconvenes the meeting at 9:00 p.m.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. DR-99-06 - WinCo Foods Grocerv Store - WinCo Foods: WinCo Foods, represented by
Lui Horstmeyer with BRS Architects, is requesting design review approval to construct a 95,380-
square foot grocery store. The site is located on the north side of East State Street within Eagle
Promenade at 3032 East State Street. (WEV)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Zoning Administrator Vaughan: Displays pictures of the proposed buildings and the elevation
and provides Council an overview of the request. Discussion on the height exception.
Lui Horstmeyer, BRS Architects, the Home Depot elevation is about 44'. Further discussion on
the height exception.
Bastian moves to approve DR-99-06-WinCo Foods Grocery Store-Win Co Foods
with all the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval. Seconded by Guerber.
Discussion. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES..............
B. DR-IOO-06 - Buildinl! Wall Sil!ns for WinCo Foods Grocerv Store _ Win Co Foods:
WinCo Foods, represented by Lui Horstmeyer with BRS Architects, is requesting design review
approval to construct building wall signage for WinCo Foods grocery store. The site is located
on the north side of East State Street within Eagle Promenade at 3032 East State Street. (WEV)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Bastian moves to approve DR-IOO-06 - Building Wall Signs for WinCo Foods Grocery
Store. Seconded by Bandy. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES..............
10. NEW BUSINESS: None
City Attorney Report: Discusses Patricia Nilsson's e-mail. Discusses the Blueprint for Good
Growth Plan and the Intergovernmental Agreement. My recommendation is that you do not
adopt this. General Council discussion. We need to put this on the City Council Agenda for
December 12th for action.
City Engineer Report: Vern Brewer, Holladay Engineering, I gave out copies of reports on
tracking the various projects. We are trying to provide these on a weekly bases. General
discussion.
ACHD: Kirk: We have scheduled the drainage problem that Council Member Guerber asked
about. Discussion on the Floating Feather Bridge.
Page J
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTESITemporary Minutes Work Area\CC-II.28-06min.doc
Bastian: I would like to find out the amount of impact fees that the City of Eagle has paid in the
last few years and also the Highway Tax dollars that would have been assigned to the City of
Eagle.
Zoning Administrator's Report: We have contacted the Rib Shack and they have until December
4,2006 to remove the tent. An officer will be ready to issue a citation on December 4th if the tent
is not removed.
Mayor: it has been recommended that the City give him a citation each day that the tent is up
after December 4th. General discussion.
Further discussion on the Rib Shack and possible violations including how sewer fees were not
figured on in house dinning, the smoke shack, parking and etc.
City Clerk/Treasurer Report: We have the new filing system in the main file room; take a look if
you haven't seen them yet.
There is an article in the Valley Times today in regards to the contest that the City Staff and
Library Staff about gather food and miscellaneous items for the Eagle Food Bank. We collected
1,700 pounds of food. The Library won the contest and will have a pizza party.
General discussion on helping the Eagle Food Bank with a location.
Mayor and Council's Report:
Bastian: None
Guerber: None
Nordstrom: None
Bandy: None
Mayor: Reports on the Treasurer Valley Partnership meeting. Discussed the fireworks ordinance
and flooding issues.
Reports on the AIC City Officials Academy that was held today. General discussion.
Discussion on the area of impact changes.
I will be gone next week to the National League of Cities.
I I. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
A. Pending & threatened litigation: I.C. g67-2345 (t)
B. Acquisition of private property: I.C. g67-2345 (c)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Bastian moves to go into Executive Session for the discussion of pending & threatened
litigation, I.C. ~67-2345 (I) and acquisition of private property, I.C. ~67-2345 (c). Seconded
by Guerber. Bastian: AYE; Guerber: AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES
M()1rI()N <:ARRIESl..................
Council goes into Executive Session at 10:05 p.m.
Council discusses pending and threatened litigation and acquisition of private property.
Council leaves Executive Session at 10:23 p.m.
12. REPORTS: See above
13. ADJOURNMENT:
Bastian moves to adjourn. Seconded by Nordstrom. ALL AYE: MOHON
CARRIES...
Page 4
K:\COUNrILlMINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-11-28-06mindoc
Hearing no further business, the Council meeting adjourned at 10:24 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
1l~~A' ~ ~
SHARON K. BERGMANN
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
APPROVED:
"..........,
" I,.
"'........ Of EAG{ ....
~....j ........ Ii' -.
" "'''-' .. ~
[" ". ,OIlA -r~ \
(J o~ .. i
I v ..- _ :
\.. ~~~\..~ 0
'..." q.:eo
\;. 4'}> ro.':l~~.f J
.... -1 tE Of .....V
...............
Page 5
K:\COUNCIL\MfNUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-] ]-28-06mindoc
Page 1 of 2
Nancy Merrill
From: Nichoel Baird
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:20 AM
To: Nancy Merrill
Subject: FW: BluePrint Interlocal Agreement
Nichoel R. Baird Spencer, MCRP, AICP
Planner III
City of Eagle
(208) 939-0227
(208)938-3854 (fax)
From: Diane [mailto:dkushlan@fiberpipe.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:39 AM
To: 'Christy Richardson'; canninga@meridiancity.org; Nichoel Baird; pnilsson@cityofboise.org; 'Elaine
Clegg'
Subject: BluePrint Interlocal Agreement
Hi All,
I just opened up the Inter -local Agreement with the scope of services for Freilich work and I
am appalled. For $350,000 ($450/hour plus expenses) the cities will receive "model"
ordinances that he has lifted from somewhere else. If you do not agree, look on page 55
(page 3 of his agreement) where he refers to the State of California, not Idaho. I can not
believe that the cities would agree to continue with this charade. It is a situation where the
emperor has no clothes. I know this sounds totally self-serving since I am doing ordinances
tailored specifically for Garden City, but what can be done? Can I challenge again the
legality of the sole source agreement? Help with a more specific scope of work that will be
more helpful to the cities and the county? Lobby the elected officials? Write letters to the
consortium and the Statesman? Please let me know. d.
Diane Kushlan mu)
PO Box 8463
I 1/28/2006
US 20/26 Corridor
Preservation Study
City of Eagle — November 28, 2006
Community Planning Association
Idaho Transportation Department
T FYRT. I+n Frrin nll LIS A). Apr. yl./Ie.F 1` F•hiAl)3 Agency sr.. ppr
Project Location
U.S. 20/26 Corridor Preservation Study Area
HIGHWAY 20/26
w ac,.,,., .0
11/28/2006
1
Purpose of Study
To protect corridor during development,
provide adequate transportation capacity, and
enhance the user safety
To evaluate corridor access management
options
To establish an "ultimate" footprint for the
corridor, including possible expanded
intersection treatments
To complete the environmental process and
allow acquisition of right-of-way as funding is
available
What to Avoid — Eagle Road!
11/28/2006
2
Purpose of This Outreach
The consultant team has completed an initial
evaluation of access management options
Screening criteria have been developed to
help evaluate these options
A public meeting to consider the initial
screening and selection process will be held
in late February 2007
Want to consult with local governments about
the options and criteria before the public
meeting
Access Management Options - 1
•-1.-s-sa ati014zn
1/2 Mile At Grade Intersection Spacing
1- Mile At Grade Intersection Spacing with 1/2 Mile
Right In/Right Out
1- Mile At Grade Intersection Spacing
At Grade Intersection with
Spacing Greater than
1 Mile, with Right In/
Right Out
Example — at -grade
intersection of expressway
and arterial.
11/28/2006
3
Access Management Options - 2
At Grade Intersection Spacing Greater than
1 Mile
Limited Access, Interchanges at 4 River
Crossings, 1- Mile At Grade Intersection
Spacing In Between
Example - grade
separated interchange/
intersection of expressway
and arterial.
Access Management Options - 3
CIM Expressway (6 Interchanges, 8
Overpasses)
CIM Expressway with HOV Lanes
No Build / No Change (required to
study as an option in federal
environmental process)
Example - full expressway
with no access to adjoining
properties.
11/28/2006
4
Screening Criteria
Improve subregional mobility
1. Measure subregional delay
Maintain adequate travel time
2. Average travel time from 1-84 to Eagle
Road
Minimize traffic congestion.
3. Level of service
Provide benefits at reasonable cost
4. Cost estimate
More Screening Criteria
Avoid or minimize impacts to state and federally
protected resources
5. Wetlands
6. Historic Resources
Minimize impacts to existing housing and businesses
7. Number of houses displaced
8. Number of businesses displaced
9. Proximity impacts (noise)
Minimize disruption to north -south travel
10. Number of north -south public roads disrupted
11/28/2006
5
Proposed Screening of Alternatives
Draft - Subject to Revision and Refinement
H. Deettn Yea% U.* m Dv ems Y+acx_• Los DrlR los ER
FY
sS Hie 4 Grene Inter weber
isoscisoo
1 Mk I Gene I.eereeedMn
: iNwq welt l:24M4 R4I I.
'NM OA
Me4
1 e Geode [Mersa bon
u wade Inlesanea Spat mg
+
:neater flee Ore 4I wile A4I
rF1
„r P 1 Oat Sy
r LL Grade Lnerreewe*nine:mkt T\.. One Mde
k
Mauled access. Inrtha
..gee +
Cmluagl. 1 M4 +1 (wade
euetwn Spam et between
r :IM cepce»war'!d.nterthalgea
Deeep+wses)
Wd+rd He Is*NUN Resource Cbpla:ed logos trentsSo 61,
woo. 4O4*kv Dnhny 01�Dtlea 7,
I Car hp+eY Stumm' Ernieere
Y
V
4
Ito lend f No Change
I-84 to Middleton Road
4
lent 114:le E+c
lreet 7e itmin"Sti,T* l
> 1
X X
XXX
X
X
II I X Xy^�X
Shela'•wit w Weal, a.
rm4rnelr'••4 nr•^rtlrrrtlittt=erni
Parallel collector
F ---
concept
This map is not Intended to show all the options under consideration.
11/28/2006
6
Black Cat Road to McDermott
Parallel collector
concept
1
This map is not intended to show all the options under consideration.
Black Cat Road to Eagle Road
Pto90 .d Ro.d Hoi.o.Y end Futwr Grvetopment
w.� DRAFT
.«... n.....xtu ......... ..........Noy
warn Vont synod T .—.. e... y.• N
.ve• ►aramttfrla
KJ4ti:'utti
This map is not intended to show all the options under consideration.
11/28/2006
7
Typical Cross -Section — 200 Foot
Right of Way
4 Lanes
6 Lanes
Cross-section would allow for transit, pedestrian/bike paths and tum lanes
What Do We Need?
•-' ':rum rnw..1111011ICI tHite.t
Response on Access Management
Support and Implementation of Parallel
Collectors
Preservation of a 200 foot right-of-way
Local Implementation through Development
Reviews and Requirements
Vision of Long -Term Needs and Issues —
Avoiding Eagle Road Means Not Doing
Business as Usual
11/28/2006
8
Name
Teri Bath
Lloyd
McHaffey
Jason Haas
Jason Pierce
Scott
Nordstorm
Ron Bath
Dave Dickey
Lee Schrack
Roger
Simmons
Lisa Stoner
Dave Moore
Bret Tinker
Cameron Arial
Eagle Urban Renewal Board
October 25, 2006
Address
Phone
e-mail
67 E State Street 939-4222 teri@eaglechamber.com
Eagle, ID 83616 850-5004
439 E Shore Dr.
Eagle, ID 83616
PO Box876
Eagle, ID 83616
PO Box 2620
Eagle, ID 83616
402 S Eagle Rd
Eagle4, ID 83616
485 E River shore
Dr.
Ste# 200
Eagle, ID 83616
Never responded
897 Parkinson
108 E Plaza
113 E Idaho Ave
100 N 9t" Street
867-5188
938-2199
830-3456
867-9527
344-7171
939-7040
841-8352
334-5100
X121
939-5723
939-7499
947-5353
344-9522
jherfl @yahoo.com
jason@idacable.com
snordstrom@fiberpipe.net
ron@windingcreekbuilders
.com
daved@idahobankingco.
com
leeschrack@landam.com
david.a.moore@
wellsfargo.com
batinkrt@iibk.net
Cameron .arial@
zionsbank.com
Please select between 5 and 9 members for this board.
Place of Positio
Business
Eagle ?
Chamber
Of
Commerce
Dynamis ?
Eagle River ?
Financial
Unison IT ?
Eagle City ?
Counsel
Salmon Point ?
Development
Idaho Banking ?
Company
Land America ?
Transnation
Title
Idaho Lottery ?
Juvenile ?
Corrections
Banker ?
Banker ?
Banker ?
CITY OF EAGLE
CITY OF EAGLE WELL #3 (BROOKWOOD) - PROJECT STATUS REPORT
FOR THE WEEK OF -11/27/06
Project number: EG083706
Location: Eastside of the City — N. of Floating Feather Rd.
Interim Funding Source: Developer Mike Hormaechea.
Estimated schedule of DEQ cash withdrawals for all loan projects (well #3
and reservoir):
• 9/30/06 - $75,000
• 12/31/06 - $450,000
• 3/31/07 - $300,000
• 6/30/07 - $1,200,000
• 9/30/07 - $400,000
• 12/31/07 - $165,000
$2,590,000
Final Funding Source: Developer 50% and a DEQ loan by the City for 50%.
Contractor for drilling well hole #3: Riverside (Terry) -privately funded by
developer.
Approx. start date of well #3 bore: November 13, 2006. Chris D. will coordinate
this work.
Completion of well #3: Dec. 10, 2006. Pump test will take place in late Dec.
2006.
Design and approval Engineer for Well House and Pump Station: John B.
Water modeling work: This work was started on Sept. 20, 2006. All preliminary
work has been completed by Andy G. Final model is waiting on pump curve
selection.
10% Design schedule:
Preliminary design- completed Oct. 2006 by John B.
Map- completed in Oct. 2006 by John B.
General plan- completed in Oct. 2006 by John B.
Site required- acquired in Oct. 2006
Specifications list- prepared in Oct. 2006 by John B.
50% Design schedule:
1
Complete design report- completed Nov. 7, 2006- John B.
Soils report- none required
Preliminary plans- completed Nov. 7, 2006- John B.
Earthwork & road design: none required
Preliminary specifications- draft done Nov. 7, 2006- John B.
Requests for permits- DEQ approval
90% Design schedule:
Other agency comments- DEQ due back on Jan. 9, 2007
Permits- approval letter from DEQ
Final plans- due Jan. 14, 2007- John B.
Final specifications- due Jan. 14, 2007- John B.
Total estimated cost including engr.: $554,000
Submittal to DEQ: Nov. 31, 2006
Approval from DEQ: Jan.20, 2007
Advertisement for bids date: Jan. 27, 2007
Bid opening date: Feb. 15, 2007
Approval by City Council date: Feb. 20, 2007
Pre -construction conference: March 2, 2007
Start of construction date: March 19, 2007
End of construction date: May 25, 2007
Construction activity: Well drilling work has started.
Project scope of work: well construction
well house
pumps
system connection
Project function: Provides water for future Eagle Sports Reservoir, and
surrounding properties.
Comments:
• Well #3 pump test is scheduled for late Dec. 2006( depending on weather
conditions). East Old Barn Rd. may have to be closed for 72 hours during
this test.
• Test can not happen until Chase Mitigation is completed.
CITY OF EAGLE
EAST SIDE (SPORTS PARK) RESERVOIR -PROJECT STATUS REPORT FOR
THE WEEK OF -11/27/06
Project number: EG020505
Location: East of N. Horseshoe Bend Rd.
Interim Funding Source: Developer Mike Hormaechea.
Estimated schedule of DEQ cash withdrawals for the loan projects (well #3
and reservoir):
• 9/30/06475,000
• 12/311064450,000
• 3/31/07-$300,000
• 6/30/07-$1,200,000
• 9/30/07-$400,000
• 12/31/07-$165.000
$2,590,000
ve* kwCOd 0City 424 o
Final Funding Source: Developer 50% and a DEQ loan bythe for 50%.
Design Engineer: Tofor S.
P.E. approval: Kasey K.
Tofor S. and Mike Huffaker are doing access design. A south route on a new
easement looks like it may work best.
Date of new easement acquired: by Dec. 15- Vern B. will be working on this
with the City Attorney.
Water modeling work: This work was started on Sept. 20, 2006. All preliminary
work has been completed by Andy G. Final model is waiting on pump curve
selection.
10% Design schedule:
Preliminary design -completed in Oct. 2006- Tofor S.
Map- completed in Oct. 2006- Tofor S.
General plan- completed in Oct. 2006- Tofor S.
Easement required -pending
Specifications list- due Nov. 15, 2006-Tofor S.
50% Design schedule:
Complete design report- due Dec. 1, 2006- Tofor S.
Soils report- received Nov.6, 2006- GEO
Preliminary plans- due Dec. 1, 2006- Tofor S.
Earthwork & road design- completed Nov. 6, 2006- Tofor S. and Mike Huffaker.
Preliminary specifications- due Dec. 10, 2006- Tofor S.
Requests for permits- ACHD ROW permit due Dec. 15, 2006- Tofor S.
90% Desiaa-schedule:
Other agency comments- DEQ comments due back on Feb. 1, 2007.
Permits- ACHD ROW permit due back on Feb. 1, 2007.
Final plans- due Feb. 15, 2007- Tofor S.
Final specifications- due Feb. 15, 2007- Tofor S.
Total estimated cost including engr.: $1,856,000
Submittal to DEQ: 50% Site Design, Dec. 15, 2006- Tofor S.
Approval from DEQ: Feb. 1, 2007
DYK or some other company will Design/ Build the tank and submit to DEQ by
Feb. 15, 2007.
ACHD may need a 2" water service line for a shooting range just north of the
reservoir. Vern is working on this.
Size of tank: 1 million gallons, located on 3 acres. This tank will be 30 ft. tall but
a large majority of it will be buried in the earth.
Andy G. and Tofor S. will be designing a PRV station. This design will be
completed by: Feb. 1, 2007
Advertisement for bids date: March 1, 2007.
Bid opening date: March 15, 2007.
Approval by City Council date: April 3, 2007.
Pre -construction conference: April 16, 2007.
Start of construction date: May 1, 2007.
End of construction date: Nov. 1, 2007.
Construction activity: None
Project scope of work: reservoir
system connection
pry station
Project function: Provides water and fire flow for future developments, and to
be able to disconnect from the United Water System.
Comments:
• Ada County has given the approval for the road layout location.
CITY OF EAGLE
CHASE PROPERTY MITIGATION- PROJECT STATUS REPORT FOR THE
WEEK OF -11/27/06
Project number: EG091306
Location: North of W. Floating Feather Rd. and West of N. Eagle Rd.
Status of agreement: Agreement between Chase Estate and the City of Eagle
was signed on Nov. 14, 2006.
Order of work after signed agreement:
• United Water did make a 12" tap in the water main and installed the PRV
and service stub all in the ACHD ROW.
• Mick or Mike from the City of Eagle will coordinate construction with
United Water Idaho and a private contractor to complete project.
• A backflow prevention device in a heated and insulated box (above
ground) "dog house" will need to be constructed on the private line leading
to the house. Mick or Mike from Eagle will take care of this by the use of a
private contractor.
• The City of Eagle will make sure the water service from the ROW is
connected to the house and barn, by the use of a private contractor.
Costs: The City will pay for costs to bring for water right mitigation measure a
water service to the Chase Estate.
Construction time: All mitigation work will need to be completed prior to Well #3
pump test, which is scheduled for late Dec. 2006.
Construction activity: Service tap was completed.
CITY OF EAGLE
CITY OF EAGLE WELL #4 (LEGACY) -PROJECT STATUS REPORT FOR
THE WEEK OF -11127106
Project number: EG061204
Location: '/4 mile north of HWY 44, between HWY 16 and Linder Rd.
Funding Source: Developer 100%
Water Rights status: A hearing is scheduled for Dec. 6, 2006. Chris D. is
responsible for this hearing. A decision from IDWR is expected by mid Feb.
2007.
Stanley Consultants will be the Engineer for the Developer (water distribution).
Design and approval Engineer: Holladay Engineering Co. will provide the water
supply design, which includes: site plan, well house, and pump stream. John B.
will be the designer and give P.E. approval.
Water modeling work: This work was started on Sept. 25, 2006. All preliminary
work has been completed by Andy G. Final model is waiting on pump curve
selection.
10% Design schedule:
Preliminary design- completed Sept. 2006 by John B.
Map- completed in Oct. 2006 by John B.
General plan- completed in Oct. 2006 by John B.
Site required- acquired in Oct. 2006
Specifications list- prepared in Oct. 2006 by John B.
50% Design schedule:
Complete design report- completed Nov. 1, 2006- John B.
Soils report- received Nov. 1, 2006
Preliminary plans- completed Nov. 1, 2006- John B.
Earthwork & road design: none required
Preliminary specifications- completed Nov. 1, 2006- John B.
Requests for permits- DEQ has given a preliminary ok for the water model and
pump house design.
90% Design schedule:
Other agency comments- DEQ due back on Jan. 31, 2007
Permits- approval letter from DEQ
Final plans- due Jan. 22, 2007- John B.
Final specifications -due Jan. 22, 2007- John B.
Submittal to DEQ: Dec.15, 2006
Approval from DEQ: Feb.15, 2007
Advertisement for bids date: Feb. 12, 2007
Bid opening date: March 13, 2007
Approval by City Council date: March 21, 2007
Pre -construction conference: April 3, 2007
Start of construction date: April 16, 2007
End of construction date: June 25, 2007
Construction activity: None
Project scope of work: well house
pumps
system connection
Project function: Provides water for future residential areas on the west side of
the city.
Comments:
• The future Legacy (well #4) and Eaglefield (well #5) wells will be
hydraulically tied together to improve water capacity for this western
region of the city.
• A large diameter test well was constructed in the Legacy plat in the
summer of 2006. This test well will be used as the permanent well #4.
• Stanley Consultants have not submitted the final water distribution plans
to the City yet, so Holladay Engineering Co. has not been able to do a
review.
CITY OF EAGLE
CITY OF EAGLE WELL #5 (EAGLEFIELD) -PROJECT STATUS REPORT FOR
THE WEEK OF -11127106
Project number: EG013305
Location: North of HWY 44, and west of Linder Rd.
Funding Source: Developer 100%
Water Rights status: A hearing is scheduled for Dec. 6, 2006. Chris D. is
responsible for this hearing. A decision from 1DWR is expected by mid Feb.
2007.
Landmark Consultants is the Engineer for the Developer (water distribution).
Design and approval Engineer: Holladay Engineering Co. will provide the water
supply design, which includes: site plan, well house, and pump stream. John B.
will be the designer and give P.E. approval.
Water modeling work: This work was started on Sept. 25, 2006. All preliminary
work has been completed by Andy G. Final model is waiting on pump curve
selection.
10% Design schedule:
Preliminary design- completed Sept. 2006 by John B.
Map- completed in Oct. 2006 by John B.
General plan- completed in Oct. 2006 by John B.
Site required- acquired in Oct. 2006
Specifications list- prepared in Oct. 2006 by John B.
50% Design schedule:
Complete design report- completed Nov. 1, 2006- John B.
Soils report- received Nov. 1, 2006
Preliminary plans- completed Nov. 1, 2006- John B.
Earthwork & road design: none required
Preliminary specifications- completed Nov. 1, 2006- John B.
Requests for permits- DEQ has given preliminary approval for the water model
and pump house design.
90% Design schedule:
Other agency comments- DEQ due back on Jan. 31, 2007
Permits- approval letter from DEQ
Final plans- due Jan. 22, 2007- John B.
Final specifications -due Jan. 22, 2007- John B.
Submittal to DEQ: Dec. 15, 2006
Approval from DEQ: Feb. 15, 2007
Advertisement for bids date: Feb. 12, 2007
Bid opening date: March 13, 2007
Approval by City Council date: March 21, 2007
Pre -construction conference: April 3, 2007
Start of construction date: April 16, 2007
End of construction date: June 25, 2007
Construction activity: None
Project scope of work: well house
pumps
system connection
Project function: Provides water for future residential areas on the west side of
the city.
Comments:
• The future Legacy (well #4) and Eaglefield (well #5) wells will be
hydraulically tied together to improve water capacity for this western
region of the city.
• A Targe diameter test well was constructed in the Eaglefield plat in the
summer of 2006. This test well will be used as the permanent well #5.
• On Oct. 12, 2006, Kasey K. sent a review letter to Landmark with
comments. The revised plans were received back to Holladay
Engineering Co. on Nov. 27, 2006.
/1--.2e--e6'
Nancy Merrill
From: Nichoel Baird
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:26 PM
To: Nancy Merrill; Susan E. Buxton
Subject: FW: BGG Steering/Technical: IGA for Jurisdictionratification
Attachments: BGG Steering/Technical: IGA for Jurisdiction ratification
BGG Steering/
Technical: IGA f...
Ok so I had the questions wrong...
My responses:
1) no
2)no
3) yes
After talking to t the mayor she would like to see a memo from all the city planner
recommending that 'Freilich services be removed and that the City's move forward to
implement the BPGG. We may want to talk to each of the Mayors before we move forward but
My Mayor is very interested in removing 'Freilich or leaving the BPGG.
Garden City Responses:
My responses:
1. No
2. No
3. Yes, 9:00 or later on Thursday morning
Star, Meridian and Kuna have not yet responded.
Nichoel R. Baird Spencer, MCRP, AICP
Planner III
City of Eagle
(208) 939-0227
(208) 938-3854 (fax)
Original Message
From: Patricia Nilsson (mailto:PNilsson@cityofboise.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:40 AM
To: Nichoel Baird; diana@cityofkuna.com; crichardson@gardencityidaho.org; Anna Canning;
GianPaolo Mammone
Subject: Fwd: BGG Steering/Technical: IGA for Jurisdictionratification
Quick straw poll of the city planners:
1) has the IGA been scheduled yet for full council adoption?
2) would your city want to continue with Freilich's services?
3) can you meet on Thursday morning to discuss?
Tricia
Patricia A. Nilsson, AICP
Manager, Comprehensive Planning
Boise City Planning and Development Services 150 N. Capitol Boulevard Boise, ID
83701-0500
208.384.3842 (direct)
1
cc/( -
SECOND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR
ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH PLAN
THIS SECOND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT made and entered this
day of December, 2006, by and among the City of Boise, City of Eagle,
City of Garden City, City of Kuna, City of Meridian, City of Star, Ada County, the
Ada County Highway District (hereinafter the "Member Agencies"), and the
Idaho Transportation Department for the purpose of adopting and implementing
the ADA Countywide Blueprint for Good Growth Plan authorized to be prepared
under the First Intergovernmental Agreement For Transportation And Land Use
Planning, entered into by the Member Agencies on August 9, 2004, hereinafter
IGA-i.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, it is the purpose of this Second Intergovernmental Agreement
(hereinafter IGA-2) to adopt the "Blueprint for Good Growth" Plan (hereinafter
"BGG") by the Member Agencies and to thereafter implement the BGG by actions
of each Member Agency by inclusion in each Member Agency's Comprehensive
Plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and other applicable land use
and transportation policies, regulations, ordinances and capital improvement
plans and programs within its legislative discretion;
WHEREAS it is also the purpose of this IGA-2 to permit the Member Agencies to
make the most efficient use of their powers through cooperation to their mutual
advantage by performing planning and regulatory functions that will best accord
with geographic, economic, population, service, and the provision of capital
infrastructure in accordance with the provisions of the adopted BGG, including
the purposes enumerated in the Local Land Use Planning Act, I.C. § 67-6502; and
WHEREAS it is the desire of the Member Agencies to implement the growth,
land use, infrastructure, service, and transportation goals, objectives, policies and
strategies of BGG in a coordinated and effective manner; and
WHEREAS each Member Agency is authorized under Idaho law to provide
comprehensive planning services and adopt comprehensive plans, sub -area
plans, land development, ordinances and regulations, including but not limited to
zoning, subdivision, capital improvement programming and budgeting for the
provision of transportation and other capital facility infrastructure and services
to implement BGG; and
Intergovernmental Agreement(54706606_1)
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
18
WHEREAS this IGA-2 respects the legislative autonomy and discretion of each
Member Agency to provide comprehensive planning and land use regulatory
control within its jurisdiction consistent with the BGG;
WHEREAS this IGA-2 is not intended to, and does not alter or change the
responsibilities of each Member Agency, nor does it relieve any Member Agency
of any function, duty, or obligation otherwise imposed by law; and
WHEREAS a copy of this IGA-2, upon its execution by the parties hereto, shall be
on file with the Clerk of the governing body of each Member Agency; and
WHEREAS under Idaho law, including but not limited to Idaho Constitution
Const. Art. XII, § 2, and Idaho Statutes §§ 31-602, 31-604, 40-1309, 40-1310, 50-
301, 67-2326, 67-2327, 67-2328, 67-2332, the Member Agencies are authorized
to enter into this IGA-2;
WHEREAS this IGA-2 specifies the duration, organization, purposes, manner of
financing, and methodology employed in carrying out the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the provisions of IGA-1 to the extent that they remain applicable
have been incorporated into this amended IGA-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this IGA-2 do agree as follows:
SECTION 1. 11.1 LE.
This Second Intergovernmental Agreement Amendment is referred to, and may
be cited, as the IGA-2.
SECTION 2. PURPOSE.
The purpose of the IGA-2 is to provide for: (a) the adoption of the BGG plan
throughout Ada County; (b) the preparation of transportation, capital facility
and services, and land use elements that shall be incorporated into the
comprehensive plan, ordinances, resolutions and policy manual for each Member
Agency; (c) the development and adoption of land use patterns that shall be
utilized in both the BGG and COMPASS/ITD Communities in Motion, Long
Range Transportation Plan, and (d) the development and adoption of land
development regulations, and ordinances to implement BGG.
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
2
19
SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this IGA-2 and all other agreements, contracts and documents
executed, adopted, or approved pursuant to this IGA-2, the following terms shall
have meaning prescribed to them within this section unless the context of their
use dictates otherwise:
Ada County Highway District ("ACHD "):
The Ada County Highway District established by referendum on May 25, 1971,
pursuant to Title 40, Idaho Code, Chapters 13 and 14.
City
"City" refers to any or all of the following cities: City of Boise, City of Eagle, City
of Garden City, City of Kuna, City of Meridian, or the City of Star.
County:
Ada County, Idaho
Consortium:
The multi jurisdictional entity established by § 4 of this Agreement in order to
carry out the purposes of this Agreement.
Governing Board:
A designated representative from each Member Agency.
Idaho Transportation Department:
The state agency responsible for statewide transportation planning.
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
3
20
Member Agency
A public agency which is a party to or subsequently becomes a party to this IGA-
2. The phrase "Member Agencies" refers collectively to all of these jurisdictions.
Plan
The BGG Nan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
Stakeholder:
Any local government, landowner, neighborhood, and special interest that has a
stake in transportation, capital facilities and services, and land use planning, and
that is listed as a recommended countywide participant on the Steering
Committee in Section 6 of this Agreement.
SECTION 4. GENERAL ORGANIZATION AND
POWERS OF CONSORTIUM.
4.1. A Consortium is hereby established that consists of the Member Agencies.
Each Member Agency shall designate a representative to serve on the
Governing Board of the Consortium. The Consortium shall appoint a
Steering Committee that consists of representatives of the Member
Agencies and appointed Stakeholders (see Section 6). The Consortium
shall appoint a Technical Committee that provides data and information to
the Steering Committee (see Section 8). The Consortium shall: (a) employ
Doherty & Associates as the Coordinating Consultant which shall provide
management and administrative services and report to the Consortium
(see Section 7); and (b) employ Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker and
Planning Works as the joint planning consultants to carry out Phase II of
the Blueprint for Good Growth process.
4.2. The Consortium may receive and expend funds, goods, and services from
the federal government or agencies and instrumentalities of state or local
governments or from civic and private sources and may contract with
these entities and provide information and reports as necessary to secure
aid.
SECTION 5. MEMBER AGENCIES.
5.1. Financial Participation
5.1.1 The allocation of financial contributions of each Member Agency is set
forth in Exhibit "B." The amount of additional funding shall be reasonably
related to the population of each Member Agency and/or to the amount
required to carry out the purposes of this Agreement after deducting other
contributions as set out in 5.1.2.
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
4
21
5.1.2 The Member Agencies shall use their best efforts to secure financial
contributions from private businesses, individuals and foundations, to
reduce the Member Agency contribution pro -rata for Phase II described in
the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "C."
5.1.3 Nothing in the IGA-2 shall be construed to obligate any Member Agency to
any indebtedness or liability, in any manner, or for any purpose exceeding
two years after the effective date of this IGA-2. Any funding that is
anticipated to exceed two years after the effective date of this Agreement
may be provided through the execution of an addendum to this
Agreement.
5.2. Procedures For Adoption Of The BGG.
The Consortium Member Agencies by approval of this IGA-2 hereby ratify the
action of the Consortium in approving the BGG Plan. The Consortium shall cause
the BGG Plan to be implemented using the procedures described in Exhibit "A"
and Scope of the Services in Exhibit "C," commencing January 1, 2007. The
Consortium Member Agencies shall vote on the adoption of the BGG Plan, as well
as on financing and expenditures of the Consortium. The affirmative vote of the
County, ACHD, the City of Boise and four (4) of the remaining Member Agencies
shall be required to approve any action taken under this Agreement. The Idaho
Transportation Department shall be entitled to provide an advisory
recommendation to the Member Agencies with respect to any vote to be taken by
the Member Agencies with respect to adoption of the Final BGG Plan. A majority
of the Member Agencies shall constitute a quorum for Consortium actions.
Each Member Agency hereby approves and ratifies the following documents,
which are attached hereto:
(a) BGG Plan (Exhibit "A");
(b) Financial Budget for Phase II (Exhibit "B");
(c) Scope of Services of Phase II (Exhibit "C");
(d) Engagement Letters for Planning Consulting Services with Paul,
Hastings, Janofsky & Walker and management coordination
services with Doherty & Associates (Exhibit "D" collectively).
These documents have been approved by each Member Agency in accordance
with all requirements of law for the execution of contracts.
Attached hereto as Exhibit "E" are ordinances or resolutions of each Member
Agency approving this Agreement and the documents described above.
5.3. The implementation of the BGG as established in Section 5.2 shall be
accomplished by each Member Agency, in its legislative discretion,
requiring consideration of consistency with the adopted BGG in the
following areas and processes:
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
5
22
(a) Future comprehensive plan amendments, including the 14 specific
components set out in Section 67-6508, Idaho Code, adoption of a
new comprehensive plan and adoption of sub -area plans;
(b) Amendments to the zoning ordinance (rezoning maps or text);
(c) Approval of all subdivision preliminary and final plats;
(d) County approval of areas of city impact pursuant to Section 67-6526
Idaho Code and the criteria and standards incorporated within the
BGG;
(e) Approval by the courts of the reasonableness of annexations;
(f) Adoption of capital improvement programs and budgets;
(g) Adoption of future right-of-way preservation maps;
(h) Administrative zoning application approvals (site development
plans, conditional use permits; variances; building and grading
permits);
(i) Approvals of planned developments and planned communities;
(j) Public improvement exception applications;
(k) Impact fee, exaction and dedication requirements;
(1) Establishing benchmarks for biennial review of the BGG in order to
carry out the goals, objectives, policies and strategies of BGG; and
(m) Preparation of BGG amendments as deemed appropriate by the
Consortium, or any Member Agency.
5.4. The Planning Consultants: (1) Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker; and (2)
Planning Works shall establish in Phase II, pursuant to the scope of
services in Exhibit "C,"
(a) Procedures and criteria for pre -application coordination;
application submittal and review fees; review by staff and planning
commissions; notice and hearing requirements consistent with
state law; approval criteria including consistency with BGG; and
appeals procedures.
(b) Development standards for future amendment or adoption of
comprehensive plans, sub -area plans, ordinances, regulations and
policies including the 14 required specific components and
applicable zoning and subdivision standards for adequate public
facility requirements; public improvement design, financing and
capital improvement programming; downtown and infill
development; transit oriented development; traditional
neighborhood development; transportation corridors and centers;
applicable building and sustainable development standards;
approvals of areas of city impact; flexible zoning, planned
development and planned community approvals.
SECTION 6. STEERING COMM, 1 I LE.
6.1. The Steering Committee shall be composed of the Member Agencies and
other stakeholders appointed by the Consortium. The Consortium shall
vote on the appointment of stakeholders to serve on the Steering
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1 6
23
Committee. The Steering Committee shall generally consist of the
following representatives:
Member Agencies
Idaho Transportation Department
Agricultural interests
Chambers of Commerce
Neighborhood Interests
Idaho Smart Growth
Environmental Interests
Treasure Valley Partnership
Development Interests (commercial and residential)
Urban Redevelopment Agencies
Public Transportation Agencies including Valley Ride
6.2. The Steering Committee shall be an advisory entity with respect to
amendment of the BGG, Phase II ordinances, regulations and policies to
implement BGG; monitoring of the BGG; and the approval process for
areas of city impact.
6.3. A record of meetings, hearings, resolutions, studies, findings, permits, and
recommendations taken shall be maintained. All meetings and records
shall be open to the public. At least one (1) regular meeting shall be held
each month for the duration of this Agreement. A majority of currently -
appointed voting members of the Steering Committee shall constitute a
quorum.
SECTION 7. MANAGING AND COORDINATING
CONSULTANT.
7.1. The Consortium shall retain and employ at their separate cost apart from
the contract for Planning Consulting Services, a Management and
Coordinating Consultant which shall be subject to direction of the
Consortium.
7.2. The Managing and Coordinating Consultant shall be responsible for the
administration of the Consortium, including arranging facilities for
meetings, notifying stakeholder representatives, bookkeeping,
coordination with the planning consultants, other duties provided by this
Agreement, and such additional duties as may be assigned by the
Consortium.
LEGAL_US_W # 547o66o6.i
7
24
SECTION 8. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
8.1. A Technical Committee is hereby created to assist the Steering Committee,
Consortium and planning consultants by collecting data and providing
advice and assistance on technical matters. The Managing and
Coordinating Consultant shall recommend the membership of the
Technical Committee, which shall be approved by the Consortium. The
number and membership of the Technical Committee shall be determined
by the Consortium. The Technical Committee may consist of
representatives from the following groups:
(a) The Idaho Transportation Department;
(b) COMPASS;
(c) Ada County Highway District;
(d) Idaho Division of Environmental Quality and Department of Water
Resources;
(e) Valley Ride; and
(f) Other professionals with expertise in land use and transportation
planning.
8.2. The Technical Committee will ensure that the planning consultants,
steering committee and Consortium have access to the most current data
for the project, assist in the alternatives analysis and review all documents
produced during the process.
SECTION 9. DURATION/TERMINATION OF
AGREEMENT.
This IGA-2 shall remain in effect until December 31, 2008, unless it is further
extended by the written agreement of the Member Agencies, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 5.2.
SECTION 10. WITHDRAWALS; DISSOLUTION
Any Member Agency shall have the right to withdraw from this IGA-2 by giving
written notice to the Managing and Coordinating Consultant. The members
agree that withdrawal will not absolve them of responsibility for meeting
financial and other obligations established by this Agreement or other contracts
or agreements which exist at the time of withdrawal. Upon termination of this
IGA-2, any money or assets in possession of the Consortium after payment of all
liabilities, costs, expenses, and charges, validly incurred under this IGA-2, shall
be returned to all member agencies in proportion to their assessment determined
at the time of termination. The debts, liabilities, and obligations of the
Consortium shall not constitute a debt, liability, or obligation of any Member
Agency.
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
8
25
SECTION n1. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT.
This IGA-2 may be amended at any time, but only by the consent of the parties
pursuant to Section 5.2.
SECTION 12. GOVERNING LAW.
This IGA-2, and its interpretation and performance, shall be governed and
construed by the applicable laws of the state of Idaho.
SECTION 13. COOPERATION BETWEEN AND
AMONG THE PARTIES.
The Member Agencies agree to cooperate with each other in all respects
regarding the matters addressed in this IGA-2.
SECTION 14. ENFORCEMENT.
It is the intent of the Member Agencies that this IGA-2 shall be binding upon the
parties hereto, and that any Member Agency shall be permitted to specifically
enforce any provision of this Agreement in any court of competent jurisdiction.
SECTION 15. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this IG -2 is, for
any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this IGA-2.
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
9
26
SECTION 16. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This IGA-2 shall become effective upon the adoption date of the IGA-2 by
each Member Agency.
APPROVED this day of , 2004.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ADA COUNTY
By:
Chairman, Board of County Commissioners, ADA County
ATTEST:
Ada County Clerk
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOISE
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
10
27
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGLE
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN CITY
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KUNA
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
LEGAL US_W # 54706606.1
11
28
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
By:
Mayor
An EST:
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STAR
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
By:
President
ATTEST:
District Clerk/Secretary
LEGAL_US_W # 54706606.1
12
29
IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
By:
Director
Ail 'EST:
LEGAL_US_W # 64706606.1
13
30
cc //-,2 -66
BLUEPR Nil For
Consortium Member Agency Meeting
Thursday, November 2, 2006 1:30 P.M. to 3:30 P.M.
ACHD Auditorium
AGENDA
Consent Agenda
a. Approval of the October 5 Meeting Notes (pg. 2 - 33 )
b. Approval of Correspondence to the Urban Land Institute (pg. 34 - 36)
c. Approval of Contract for Professional Services between BGG and Ada County (pg.
37 - 48)
d. Authorization of Payment for Sept 2006 Paul Hastings Invoice (pg. 49-52)
II. For Information
a. Potential Process & Standards for Modifications of Area of Impact (to be distributed
separately by Dr. Freilich)
Robert Freilich will review the responses from the jurisdictions regarding the draft
processes presented at the September meeting. He will provide the Consortium with an
update regarding the review of these revised processes now by the Steering and
Technical Committees. Dr. Freilich will also present a draft outline of the
Intergovernmental Agency Agreement for review by the Consortium.
b. Land Use Assumptions in North Ada County
Several Steering Committee members asked for this item to be a topic at the November 2
joint meeting of the Steering and Technical Committees. Robert Freilich will provide a
verbal update of this Steering/Technical Committee discussion addressing:
i. Coordination of land use planning w/ area of impact extension
ii. Coordination of land use entitlements with adequate public facilities
c. Phase II Schedule Update
The scheduled completion for consultant work by Dr. Freilich, as well as Project
Coordination by Doherty & Associates is December 31, 2006. Robert Freilich will discuss
a revised project schedule at the meeting.
III. Other Information
a. Project Coordinator's Report (pg. 53-54)
b. Funding Status (pg. 55-57)
Remaining 2006 Consortium meetings are as follows:
December 14, 2006, 2:00 — 4:00 PM, ACHD Auditorium
Blueprint for Good Growth - clo Doherty & Associates — 575 E. Parkcenter Blvd, Suite 200 - Boise, ID 83706
Business (208) 336-0420 - Fax (208) 336-2407— Email kdohertv(&dohertvena.com
www.blueprintforgoodgrowth.com
L\Doherty&Assoc\Blueprint for Good Growth Coordination\Consortium1110206_meet_membll_member_agency_agenda_110206 DOC
BLUEPRINT] for
Good GROWTH
Countywide Land Use and Transportation Guide Plan
Attendees:
Meeting Minutes
Consortium Meeting — ACHD Auditorium
Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 1:30 P.M. to 3:30 P.M.
David Bieter, Mayor, City of Boise *
Elaine Clegg, Council member, City of Boise
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor, City of Meridian *
John Franden, President, ACHD *
Carol McKee, Commissioner, ACHD
Nancy Merrill, Mayor, City of Eagle *
Judy Peavey -Derr, Commissioner, Ada County
Christy Richardson, Garden City *
Diana Sanders, City of Kuna*
Eric Shannon, District 3 Engineer, ITD*
Alan Shealy, Council member, City of Boise
Jim Tibbs, Council member, City of Boise
Fred Tilman, Commissioner, Ada County
Rick Yzaguirre, Commissioner, Ada County *
Karen Doherty, Doherty & Associates
Dr. Bob Freilich, Paul Hastings
Others: (See attached sign -in sheet)
President Bieter called the meeting to order at 1:40 P.M. Official delegates are
noted with a * in the attendee listing.
CONSENT AGENDA
a. Approval of the September 14 Meeting Notes
b. Authorization of Payment for June -Sept 2006 Paul Hastings Invoices
Consent agenda approved.
2
ACTION ITEMS
a. Land Use Assumptions in North Ada County
Charles Trainor/COMPASS and Dr. Freilich provided information relative
to the traffic estimates in North Ada County. Slides shown during this
portion are included in these meeting minutes.
After discussion, the group asked ACHD about its deadline of November
1, 2006. Both Ada County and Eagle expressed that they are doing
studies of this area. The Consortium members generally acknowledged
that Ada County has the current land use authority over the Northwest
Ada County foothills. Their Comprehensive Plan will be completed in
December which will provide ACHD with a scenario to proceed with a
transportation plan. Members asked for deferment of response to ACHD
until December. ACHD was agreeable to this revised schedule.
b. Potential Process & Standards for Modifications of Area of Impact
Dr. Freilich reviewed the draft processes with the Consortium. He noted
these suggestions were created based on the direction from the
September Consortium meeting to address this issue with urgency. He
noted that the schedule included in the document is a draft but suggested
that the Consortium be expedient when reviewing and implementing these
processes.
Commissioner Tilman and Mayor Merrill both suggested that these
processes may be premature and asked for time to work with the Idaho
Association of Counties and Idaho Association of Cities. The Consortium
members asked the Consultant team to draft additional processes to
address procedures if two cities request the same area for inclusion within
their Area of Impact (A of I) and possible ways to resolve disagreements
between the Cities and County if an A of I is contested.
A motion was made for the Consortium member agencies to distribute the
draft processes internally within their own jurisdictions and will provide
comments back to Dr. Freilich and Michael Lauer by October 20. Motion
carried with two dissents, Tilman and Merrill. A draft document reflecting
the requested jurisdiction modifications will then be presented to a joint
meeting of the Steering and Technical Committees on November 2.
The Consortium acknowledged the continued need for input from the
Steering Committee during the Implementation Phase. Therefore, the
next BGG meeting on implementation will be a joint meeting of the
Steering and Technical Committee.
3
The Consortium also directed Dr. Freilich to draft a response to the
September correspondence from the Urban Land Institute Idaho Chapter
(ULI). This response shall be sent to the Consortium for review prior to
distribution to ULI. ULI shall also be invited to the next Steering/Technical
meeting.
c. Intergovernmental Agency Agreement Status
The agreements are not yet prepared. ACHD is working on this item.
INFORMATION ITEMS
a. Adequate Public Facilities
Dr. Freilich updated the Consortium on Adequate Public Facilities. Slides
shown during this portion are included in these meeting minutes.
Dr. Freilich discussed the impact of growth on ITD. He felt that
extraordinary impact fees could be lobbied on behalf of ITD; he distributed
Idaho Statutes Title 67-82 to illustrate this matter.
b. Project Coordinator's Report
Karen Doherty reported that her firm is working on the tax return for
Blueprint for Good Growth, Inc. She also indicated that public inquiries
about the project have been increasing.
c. Funding Status
The BGG checking account will have a minimal balance after accounts
payable are processed. This situation will be remedied by the receipt of
jurisdiction contributions now that the new fiscal year has begun. The
funding committee is still working to secure commitments from Star, Kuna,
and Garden City as well as about $100,000 from private donations. Karen
Doherty noted that the IRS did approve the BGG's non-profit status.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:30 P.M.
4
Blueprint for Good Growth
Committee: (G i .*5 C► t w n 1
Date: io- 5-ct,
Name
/i
UrA-12-12
Ir(.0 a
alarm Gall:141
1-1AANctiqA,
&Avsvx, (rf-vvik.t1
CjAA7
$07-4.01,-2,[12e0r.
72/ttri/J Iurt/Oua-
PA K S7 -,1 -Re
Aro-
SEWEIL
N�v
.�t)c< pin NE
gg 44,4 /4±6
/1/(1- dot UMW
Contact Number
'2 65,10 a
q • c54
?VI- 335V2 ,
3,3S- loon
Zg6-0573
go?)4
3
2e57-711
3
if -4/a00
1172.-S;ZS
?Z - Cdcl4 l
92z- *-Q
317. 6 4zq,
3S8-Z� �z-
33�- 8'15;
Representing
4 011-0
`fir COE--
eft/
6Anv._etck‘
fiAnk)
SIANCAA---
&Dula) k
„Lc, R-41 /4-7
elt-tat„
21/4oA Co V rt
ow6//r W L'o,,ei°o /ow
cask-- ErRa eimm p
3165Puvleepn,451LLC_
rDANO S-rivmsNLa
AV -Are- gsi bt5
-13/41G.
ITO
5
Basic Growth Assumptions
• Added estimated planned community's growth to 2030
Community Choices forecast
— 16 potential planned communities (as of June 2006)
— Growth estimates for M3 and Cartwright Ranch (provided by
developers)
— Assumed 75% of total acres as buildable for other
• 90% residential and 10% non-residential
— Calculated housing units estimates at 3 units/acre
• Assumed 95% occupancy =households
— Calculated population at persons per household rate (2000 Census)
• Results: estimated additional 69,000 households and
198OOO ppuIation on top of the 73,000 hhs and 200,000
population in Community Choices
6
Community Choices and Planned Community Growth
2010 Improvements
Over 752,000 vehicle hours of delay
Community Choices and Planned Community
G With 2030 Improvements
Malt 88
GenuomyRJ
.y18
Re8 Top RE
19
Above
31%
Hpalurt Rd
Mitsar� A<
S
Below
69%
Over 209,000 vehicle hours of delay
8
O30 Community Choices
nd Planned Communitie
- 2010 Network
Oe•oror,••
•••••• •••• ...111.••••••
1
_ I
lo••• ••
VO Moral
•••••• ••••
2030 Community Choice
3nd Planned Communitie
- 2030 Network
Ol•••••• Rd
Ow • •o• N.M. Zoo* Mk
1
••
.11
Plaud• Sony N•
rxmon. • or r.e•te.
•• .01.4 ••• 44
V
U • • •
LH S024
1,•••••••••
Now.. P.41
.40 .0..•
CO•••••1
Nam. ad
O. I. V
0. 44 40. •
•
sz.
mof
a
W. •
s
Count and Forecast Comparisons
tit
2,580
(28,x)
r --
Beacon LigqRd
1,439 No Floating Feather
(23,100)
1
1,043
— (18,000)
- J.
x
3,470
(42,300)
8.432
(17,400)
8,910
•.- ** (44,400)
US HV 'Y 20 8 /6
12,925 e/o Star Rd
(38.900)
t3
Current Count 1
(2030 Forecast)
Community Choices Growth - No improvements
Above
43"/0
Below
57%
Over 292,000 vehicle hours of delay/ —1
11
Above
23%
Community Choices Growth - With Improvements
IN I
.
4 p , A.441
Inlips,
Azzs.4
. swim •••••mran raiz\ -I::
linvimimmemeserm mu; :a: el 1r tiL
I' 11111P,WEINIMIETIRE awn in Tlarili . A
:"."HtillW ."'.1.1 114111MMI Iii ill- *,,fi • m■ iri 1 Li : - - 1!
1.11 'PP -Ammo's' ma-- 114" 11-4
I imas MR IlaktbAili he;
1111=te4MEMIliall.11111M1 1
1
I
i I
I
Below ,.
77%
NI=
Over 109,000 vehicle hours ofdel
12
2030 Community
Road Name
1-84
SH 16
SH 16
3 CRX
SH 16
SH 44
Eagle Rd
SH 44
US 20/26
Linder Rd
SH 55
US 20/26
SH 55
Beacon Light Rd
SH 69
Lake Hazel Rd
Beacon Light Rd
Kuna Mora Rd
Pleasant Valley
Linder Rd
Linder Rd
Cloverdale Rd
Kuna Mora Rd
Pleasant Valley
Star Rd
Ballantyne Rd
Cloverdale Rd
Floating Feather Rd
Ten Mile Creek Rd
Eagle Rd
Floating Feather Rd
Ballantyne Rd
Choices Plus Planned Communites known as of
June 2006
Location
north of Black's Creek IC
River Crossing
north of Beacon Light Rd
River Crossing
north of SH 44
west of SH 55
River Crossing
east of SH 16
west of SH 55
north of SH 44
north of SH 44
east of SH 16
north of Beacon Light Rd
west of SH 55
north of Kuna Rd
west of 1-84
east of SH 16
west of 1-84
south of Lake Hazel
River Crossing
north of Beacon Light Rd
North of Hubbard Rd
east of Cloverdale Rd
north of Kuna Mora
River Crossing
north of Beacon Light Rd
North of Kuna Mora
west of SH 55
west of Pleasant Valley Rd
north of Beacon Light Rd
east of Under Rd
north of SH 44
2030 Forecast
88,200
61,300
53,300
51,600
49,600
47,300
46,800
44,400
43,200
42,300
39,300
38,900
35,500
34,700
31,800
29,200
28,800
25,000
24,100
23,600
23,100
21,700
20,200
17,700
17,400
16,000
15,600
14,600
14,600
13,100
12,500
10,400
Road Name
1-84
1-84
Eagle Rd
Eagle Rd
Fairview Ave
Eagle Rd
Eagle Rd
State St
Eagle Rd
Eagle Rd
Glenwood St
Fairview Ave
Fairview Ave
Curtis Rd
Fairview Ave
Millwaukee St
Chinden Blvd
State St
SH 44
Bridge
Vista Ave
Orchard St
Five Mile Rd
SH 69
Victory Rd
Meridian Rd
Ustick Rd
Cloverdale Rd
Maple Grove Rd
Maple Grove Rd
Gary Ln
Goddard St
forecast comps.xls
Today's Equivalent
Location
between Cole and Orchard IC's
between Vista and Broadway 1C's
south of Franklin Rd
north of Franklin Rd
west of Eagle Rd
south of Fairview Ave
south of Ustick Rd
east of Veteran's Memorial Parkwa
north of Ustick Rd
south of McMillan Rd
River Crossing
east of Locust Grove Rd
west of Maple Grove Rd
south of Northview St
east of Main St (M)
north of Franklin Rd
west of 32nd St
northwest of 23rd St
w/o Ballantyne Ln
River Crossing
s/o Rosehill St
No Emerald St
s/o Fairview Ave
No Columbia Rd
w/o Orchard St
No Cherry Ln
e/o Five Mile Rd
s/o Edna St
s/o Overland Rd
s/o Ustick Rd
No State St
e/o Maple Grove Rd
Actual Coun
(2005 or 2006
88,261
61,547
53,948
51,999
49,861
47,99
45,415
44,336
43,15:
42,83
39,67
38,51
35,48
34,23'
31,831
29,93'
28,78
25,67:
24,29
23,67
23,321
21,72
20,74:
17,73'
17,39
16,10
15,451
14,747
14,671
13,14
12,55
10,46
13
IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 8028
Boise, ID 83707-2028
September 20, 2006
The Honorable Mayor David Bieter
President, Ada County Consortium
Blueprint for Good Growth
c/o Doherty & Associates
575 E. ParkCenter Blvd., Suite 200
Boise, Idaho 83706-6674
RE: Land Use Assumptions for the Northwest Ada County Foothills
Dear Mayor Bieter:
(208) 334-8300
itd.idaho.gov
In regards to ACHD's letter of September 13th on the subject, 1 would also like to endorse pursuing more precise long
range planning data, as well as share some comments and perspectives.
It is my understanding that COMPASS is mandated to do transportation planning in Ada County, which it does in part
through the coordinated efforts of its various members. The COMPASS long range planning effort, "Communities in
Motion", has so far provided general planning data, but more precise data should follow as member agencies decide
what types and locations of land use will be allowed.
ITD will use this data to determine impacts and needs to the state highway system, and has the following studies in the
Draft STIP which specifically address the Northwest Ada County Foothills area:
• Key 09963, SH -16, I-84 to Emmett Study — FY 2009
• Key 09967, SH -55 Corridor Plan — FY 2007
As part of these studies, we will coordinate with ACHD and other COMPASS members. We will also continue to
coordinate with ACHD on its study of the local road system It is my understanding that all of these studies are
subordinate to the scenario determined in "Communities in Motion". As such, I would expect any additional analysis
required for proposed land uses different from that scenario to be funded by those who propose it.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
:mow
ERIC R. SHANNON, P.E.
District 3 Engineer
./Ar -41.44101-,
cc: Matt Stoll, Executive Director of COMPASS
Michael Lauer. Planning Works
Karen Doherty, Blueprint for Good Growth
John Franden, President of Ada County Highway District
14
BLUEPRINTI for
Good
GROWTH
Adequate Public
Transportation Facilities
Dr. Robert H. Freilich, ACCP
Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker
Impending Growth Problems
Decline in existing built-up areas
Degradation of the environment
Over utilization of energy sources
Fiscal strains
Deficiencies in public facilities
Housing affordability
The Public Infrastructure Gap
National infrastructure
deficiencies now exceed
$4 trillion and are growing at a rate
of $1.7 trillion every 5 years
$4,000,000,000,000
Capital Costs Shifted to
Existing Development
Population A B C D
10,000 S12,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
Total
6,000
4,000
3,000
25,000
6,000
4,000
3,000
13,000
4,000
3,000
7,000
3,000
3,000
Relative Cost of Planned
Development v. Sprawl
Facility Sprawl Planned Development
Duncan Burchell Frank
Synthesis
Roads 100% 40% 76% 73% 75%
Schools 100% 93% 97% 99% 95%
Utilities 100% 600 92% 66% 85%
Other 100% 102% N/A 100% N/A
Legend
Urbanized Area
Planned Urbanized Area
Future Urbanized Area
Building Permits Issued
Before 9,000 BPs
8,000 Outside
1,000 Inside
After 16,000 BPs
8,000 Outside
8,000 Inside 21
Transportation Planning -
Bridging the State -City -County
Gap in Ada County, Idaho
Comprehensive Plan as Guideline
Definition of growth tiers (areas of impact)
Targets State and ACHD funding to priority
growth areas (areas of impact)
Linkage between CIP, development and
annexation
Adequate public facilities required
Promotes creative, efficient development
Extraordinary impact fees
_6 0
} c/7
E •U C
00 c •>
46a)0�>.E� 0
_c c�- 0 0
,i, -.c .0_ 0 -c 0 -o
--- o 0)a) -0 c
a
0{=a2cg4, 0
(I-) to -2 Pc Ea) TT, ‘1(5
Q T 0 C
��o�o� o
0 0t�
0 L— T Q 0 0
_ L
00D0• 0 E.
°'o coca
o.-oa) c
0
, 0 4- 0 0 0 0 00
o p L(2 4E- 175 .f.
(0,5j
LD ^`
-}- uJ
U o U o 8 z
Concurrency and
Adequate Public
Facilities Planning
Concurrency
Timing and Sequencing (police
powers)
CIP (fiscal powers)
Carrying Capacity
Analysis
Adopt LOS
Standards
Deficiencies
No Deficiencies
4
Facilities for
Existing Dev.
Dolan/Ehrlich Analysis
of Concurrency
New Growth Related Facilities
Impact Fees
Concurrency
Rough Proportionality
Dolan v. City of Tigard
Florida Rationally
Related Test
Deny Approval
Development
Agreement
Leveraged Negotiation
(Ehrlich v. Culver City)
Good Faith Test
Deficiencies in
public services
CIP will solve deficiencies
within reasonable period of time
Developer gains vested
rights, local gov't gains
facilities in greater
capacity than rough
proportionality
Golden v. Planning
Board, Town of
Ramapo: applies to
school facilities
Development Agreements
Concurrency management
Serve new demand
Solve existing deficiencies
Growth management
Litigation defense
Mitigation Fees
Intended to permanently protect the
resource that is being depleted
Distinguishable from impact fees
Fees are designed to make whole or
replace the depleted resource
Provide a basis for creating value for the
farmer or holder of environmental land
equal to the value that would be
obtained from sale for development
Not taxes, but police power exactions
Conclusion
Fiscal Conservatism Will Solve Ada County's
Growth Management Problems
Expansion of concurrency management
together with extraordinary impact fees
Promotion of efficient development in
corridors, centers, downtown development
and areas of impact
Idaho Statutes
Idaho Statutes
Page 1 of 1
10(5 /°6
TITLE 67
STATE GOVERNMENT AND STATE AFFAIRS
CHAPTER 82
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
67-8214. OTHER POWERS AND RIGHTS NOT AFFECTED (1) Nothing in this
chapter shall prevent a governmental entity from requiring a developer to
construct reasonable project improvements in conjunction with a development
project.
(2) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent or prohibit
private agreements between property owners or developers, the Idaho
transportation department and governmental entities in regard to the
construction or installation of system improvements or providing for credits
or reimbursements for system improvement costs incurred by a developer
including interproject transfers of credits or providing for reimbursement for
project improvements which are used or shared by more than one (1) development
project. If it can be shown that a proposed development has a direct impact on
a public facility under the jurisdiction of the Idaho transportation
department, then the agreement shall include a provision for the allocation of
impact fees collected from the developer for the improvement of the public
facility by the Idaho transportation department.
(3) Nothing in this chapter shall obligate a governmental entity to
approve development which results in an extraordinary impact.
(4) Nothing in this chapter shall obligate a governmental entity to
approve any development request which may reasonably be expected to reduce
levels of service below minimum acceptable levels established in the
development impact fee ordinance.
(5) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to create any additional
right to develop real property or diminish the power of counties or cities in
regulating the orderly development of real property within their boundaries.
(6) Nothing in this chapter shall work to limit the use by governmental
entities of the power of eminent domain or supersede or conflict with
requirements or procedures authorized in the Idaho Code for local improvement
districts or general obligation bond issues.
(7) Nothing herein shall restrict or diminish the power of a governmental
entity to annex property into its territorial boundaries or exclude property
from its territorial boundaries upon request of a developer or owner, or to
impose reasonable conditions thereon, including the recovery of project or
system improvement costs required as a result of such voluntary annexation.
The Idaho Code is made available on the Internet by the Idaho Legislature as a public service.
This Internet version of the Idaho Code nay not be used for commercial purposes. nor may this
database be published or repackaged for commercial sale without express written permission.
Search the Idaho Statutes
Available Reference: Search Instructions.
The Idaho Code is the property of the state of Idaho, and is copyrighted by Idaho law, I.C. § 9-350.
According to Idaho law, any person who reproduces or distributes the Idaho Code for commercial
purposes in violation of the provisions of this statute shall be deemed to be an infringer of the state of
Idaho's copyright.
hftr llww�ui.state.id.us/cai-bin/newidst?sctid=670820014.K
10/5/2006
33
Atlanta
Beijing
Brussels
Hong Kong
London
Los Angeles
Milan
New York
Orange County
Palo Alto
Paris
San Diego
San Francisco
Shanghai
Stamford
Tokyo
Washington, DC
(213) 683-6314
robertfreilich@paulhastings.com
October 25, 2006 58355.00002
Quentin Knipe
ULI - Idaho
Re: ULI - Idaho/Blueprint For Good Growth Recommendations
Dear ULI Idaho Members:
I serve as the project director for the Blueprint For Good Growth ("BGG") established
by the six cities, in Ada County, Ada County and the Ada County Highway District
pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement charging the eight Blueprint Consortium
members with developing a countywide transportation and land use plan.
At their September 14, 2006 meeting the Consortium was privileged to have you present a
BGG recommendation adopted by the Executive Committee of ULI-Idaho. The
Consortium requested that I respond to your key buy -in points with regard to the progress
of the BGG in meeting or responding to ULI's suggestions.
1. Buy -in: You requested a confirmation of the Consortium's full commitment to
the BGG process and implementation and the role of citizens and the private
sector.
Response:
(a) The Consortium recently voted at its September 4, 2006 meeting to adopt
the BGG goals, objectives, policies and strategies. It has also voted to raise the
funds for completing Phase II of the BGG process — implementation of the BGG
Plan by the constituent members in their ordinances, comp plans and budgetary
actions.
(b) With regard to your inquiry about the role of the private sector, the
Consortium has set out to raise substantial funds from the business community
for Phase II. A financial committee has been working under the leadership of
Mayor Bieter. The Consortium originally sought to obtain the support of the
Boise Chamber of Commerce when BGG was initiated two years ago. Continuing
efforts are being made to obtain that commitment. Other industries and business
leaders have pledged funds towards the BGG budget. ULI Idaho can play a
LEGAL_US_W # 54673130.1
34
Quentin Knipe
October 25, 2006
Page 2
leading role in obtaining the business community's support and its efforts would
be welcomed by the Consortium. We agree that a credible private sector
"champion" would assist the overall acceptability of the final BGG plan.
(c) With regard to citizens' support, there is money in the Phase I budget to
hold public meetings on the BGG before it is finally adopted. We are also seeking
the support of Smart Growth, Idaho, environmental, transit and neighborhood
groups.
2. Accountability: The suggestions on having annual reports and monitoring are
being processed through the BGG process. Benchmarks for annual progress
reports are part of the Plan framework. No consideration has been given to the
question of a trusted outside source to monitor the benchmark indicators of
success. Would ULI Idaho be willing to act in that capacity?
3. Resources:
(a) Permanent staffing has not been suggested so far by the Steering
Committee to the Consortium. Your recommendations for permanent staffing
and funding will be presented at the November 2, 2006 joint Steering Committee
and Technical Committee meeting.
(b) Implementation is all part of Phase II. The Consortium is already working
on the process for approval of 20 year areas of impact. A new Intergovernmental
Agreement to carry out Phase II and for future monitoring and BGG phases will
be on the Consortium's December agenda. Phase II will result in the consultant's
preparation of draft plan element regulations, policies and ordinances
(transportation and transit corridor centers zoning; transfers of development
rights and mitigation fees for open space preservation; extraordinary
transportation impact fees; processing of areas of impact; adequate public facility
ordinances for sewer, water, drainage, parks, transportation and public safety
facilities; planned community zoning; infill ordinances; environmental overlay
zones; future right-of-way acquisition; 5 and 20 year funded and prioritized capital
improvement programs).
Legislation will be sought on bringing ITD into the impact fee and adequate public facility
review for state roads. Other legislation will provide for greater funding by improvement
districts tied to the capital improvements programming within areas of impact.
LEGAL_US_W # 54673130.1
35
Quentin Knipe
October 25, 2006
Page 3
I trust that this letter meets your requests. If you or the Executive Committee have any
further requests, please do not hesitate to provide them to Karen Doherty at Doherty
Engineering. Karen serves as the administrator of the BGG process.
Sincerely,
Robert H. Freilich
Project Manager for Blueprint For Good Growth
RHF:df
cc: Michael J. Lauer, Planning Works
LEGAL_US_W # 54673130.1
36
Agreement No.
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC.
THIS AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IS
MADE AND ENTERED INTO BY ADA COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, ("ADA COUNTY") AND BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD
GROWTH, INC. (THE "CONSULTANT").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Agreement for Transportation and Land Use
Planning was entered into on or about August 1, 2004 by the City of Boise, City of Eagle,
City of Garden City, City of Kuna, City of Meridian, City of Star, Ada County, the Ada
County Highway District ("CONSORTIUM") for the purpose of establishing a
Countywide Transportation and Land Use Guide Plan; and
WHEREAS, ADA COUNTY along with the other CONSORTIUM agencies,
initially contributed funds for Phase I of the project and each entity of the
CONSORTIUM has been asked to pledge additional funds for the completion of Phase II
of the project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the August 3, 2006 CONSORTIUM meeting, ADA
COUNTY agreed to contribute $50,000 to be used for 1) the funding of a consultant to
act as Local Project Coordinator and 2) the funding of Paul Hastings (successor to
Freilich, Leitman, and Carlisle ("FLC") services; and
WHEREAS, the non-profit organization titled Blueprint for Good Growth, Inc.
(CONSULTANT) has been duly incorporated in the State of Idaho and has been formed
for the purpose of accepting the Member Agency's contributions to the
Intergovernmental Agreement for Transportation and Land Use Planning project,
including that of the Project Coordinator, and making payments for services contracted
thereunder, including those designated in Exhibit C of the Intergovernmental Agreement;
and
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 1
37
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and
agreements stated herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Ada County and the Consultant agree:
AGREEMENT
SECTION 1. TASKS OF LOCAL PROJECT COORDINATOR POSITION.
CONSULTANT agrees to provide assistance to the ADA COUNTY pursuant to the
following terms and conditions:
a. During the term of this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall act as the
consultant for the ADA COUNTY.
b. CONSULTANT shall select an individual or corporation to act as Project
Coordinator, pursuant to its powers under the Intergovernmental
Agreement.
c. CONSULTANT shall insure that the entity or person chosen to act as the
Project Coordinator be insured and provide certificates of insurance,
including worker's compensation as set forth in Exhibit A of this Agreement.
d. CONSULTANT'S tasks, to be provided by and through the Project
Coordinator that it selects, pursuant to its powers under the
Intergovernmental Agreement for Transportation and Land Use Planning
include:
1. To serve as the local coordinator for all Project activities;
2. To serve as the independent, neutral facilitator and staff for the
CONSORTIUM, Steering Committee and Technical Committee;
3. Ensure that all stakeholders are fully informed of Project progress,
findings, decisions and upcoming activities;
4. Ensure full coordination with the COMPASS/ITD Long Range
Transportation Plan and "Communities in Motion" planning process
and prevent duplication of planning efforts;
5. Pursuant to the Freilich, Leitman, and Carlisle ("FLC") Scope of
Services schedule all designated meetings, prepare for and facilitate
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 2
38
all meetings of the CONSORTIUM, FLC, Steering Committee and
Technical Committee and joint meetings with the COMPASS
consultants and staff of "Communities in Motion ";
6. Prepare agendas in consultation with the Committee Chairs;
7. Coordinate all meeting logistics, including participant notification,
facilities, mailings, etc.;
8. Prepare and maintain a record of minutes;
9. All meetings shall be open to the public consistent with the Idaho
Open Meetings Law;
10. Conduct or ensure completion of all follow up activities from
meetings, including compiling data and reports, and preparing draft
public information materials;
11. Oversee the contract with FLC for preparation of the Guide Plan to
ensure timely completion of work tasks;
12. Provide logistics support and help coordinate public involvement
meetings in cooperation with COMPASS and the CONSULTANT
team on the LRTP and FLC;
13. Ensure adequate and timely information is made available to the
public and interested stakeholders by posting information on the
Project web site;
14. Serve as staff resource for media relations, with support from
CONSORTIUM agencies;
15. Identify funding opportunities, prepare applications and administer
grants from government, private and foundation sources;
16. Maintain all financial records for the Project and provide regular
reports to the CONSORTIUM on budget status;
17. Maintain a record of all studies, meetings, hearings, resolutions,
findings and recommendations;
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 3
39
18. Perform duties as assigned by the Steering Committee and/or
Technical Committee that are related to the Scope of Services.
19. Perform such other tasks as desired by the CONSORTIUM.
SECTION 2. TASKS OF PAUL HASTINGS (successor to FLC). CONSULTANT
agrees to provide assistance to the ADA COUNTY pursuant to the following terms and
conditions:
a. During the term of this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall act as the
consultant for the ADA COUNTY.
b. CONSULTANT shall insure that Paul Hastings be insured and provide
certificates of insurance, including worker's compensation as set forth in
Exhibit A of this Agreement.
d. CONSULTANT'S tasks, to be provided by and through Paul Hastings,
pursuant to its powers under the Intergovernmental Agreement for
Transportation and Land Use Planning include:
Task 12: Initial Assessment
12.1 Physical Assessment.
Evaluate all available resource materials necessary to integrate the
Transportation and Land Use Plan recommendations into local
comprehensive plan elements and implementing regulations. Materials will
include maps or diagrams depicting setbacks, densities and intensities, and
a windshield survey of building forms and site design typologies in the
region.
12.2 Regulatory Assessment.
Review local comprehensive plans and development regulations such as
zoning, subdivision, and related development controls. The objective of this
task is to assess the institutional framework for development regulation and
each jurisdiction, administrative and staffing issues, techniques that are
already being used, techniques that have not been tried, and specific goals,
objectives, policies, and strategies for regulating new development.
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 4
40
12.3 Legal Assessment.
Review and analyze the need for additional legislation to implement
techniques such as amortization, growth -management, aesthetic regulation,
design regulations, and other implementation recommended growth
coordination strategies. Review and analyze constitutional provisions, state
statutes, and judicial cases relating to innovative and effective land use
controls to implement the plan.
12.4 Market and Construction Assessment.
ACRD, the public works officials of each jurisdiction, and real estate or
market professionals if available, will provide the consultant an overview
of market values throughout the county, including undeveloped land,
developed land, construction costs, and development costs and market
values for the various densities currently permitted in the zoning ordinances
of the individual jurisdictions. The purpose of this exercise is to: (a)
identify PDR priorities; (b) to develop appropriate density and intensity
standards, (c) establish transfer ratios for transfer development rights
(TDR) ordinances for preservation of agricultural and environmentally
sensitive lands; (d) prepare guidelines for public-private development; and
(e) standards for right-of-way preservation.
12.5 Infrastructure Assessment
Interview the service providers for the following public facilities
throughout the county in order to assess existing levels of service, and
anticipated service levels, and a proposed improvements, and issues
affecting the continuation of existing levels of service: water, wastewater,
roads, schools, EMS, police, and fire. Provide an assessment of the
facilities that are most appropriate for inclusion in an adequate public
facilities ordinance due to factors such as: constraints on future growth and
development, the degree to which an adequate public facilities standard can
be integrated with countywide transportation and land use policies,
availability of financing, and the degree to which changes and levels of
service are responsive to future growth and development.
Task 13: Initial Draft of Local Plan and Code Revisions.
13.1 Land Use/Growth Management Elements
Update the land use elements and prepare a growth management element
for each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. The growth management
elements will establish a unifying framework for the entire comprehensive
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 5
41
plan, while the land use element will incorporate the provisions of the
county -wide transportation and land use guide plan into the jurisdiction's
existing planning framework.
13.2 Draft Initial Code Text.
Prepare for ADA County, the six cities (Boise, Eagle, Garden City, Kuna,
Meridian and Star) and ACHD, (a) amendments to their comprehensive
plans and ACRD Policy Manual to incorporate the Final Countywide Guide
Plan as growth management, land use and transportation elements; (b)
amendments to the county, cities and ACHD land development regulations,
implementing the adopted comprehensive transportation and land use
elements and the Countywide Plan's goals, objectives, policies and
strategies. The land development regulation amendments will include:
13.2.1
13.2.2
13.2.3
13.2.4
13.2.5
13.2.6
13.2.7
13.2.8
13.2.9
13.2.10
13.2.11
13.2.12
13.2.13
Right-of-way preservation ordinances
Transportation Corridor Overlay Districts including joint public-
private development techniques
Prioritized Capital Improvement Program Ordinances
Adequate Public Facility Ordinances
Impact Fee Ordinance Standards and Procedures (not including
calculation of impact fee amounts)
Transit Oriented Zoning Districts
Traditional Neighborhood Zoning Districts
Agricultural preservation techniques
Common Subdivision standards to be used in county impact
areas
Infill and Compatibility Standards
Extra -territorial improvement and levels of service for
consistency between the County and each City's impact area
Extraterritorial utility service area standards and regulations
Establishment of zoning and subdivision regulations to
implement transportation corridor and centers boundaries and
standards
It is anticipated that these drafts will be textual overlays that can be applied
to the zoning and subdivision regulations of each individual jurisdiction.
Specific applications of the ordinances, such as the mapping of individual
overlay districts, integration into individuals zoning and subdivision
regulations, and the allocation of densities, intensities, or development
potential to individual land areas, is not part of the scope of services and
that may be authorized by the individual jurisdiction pursuant to a separate
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 6
42
contract.
Task 14: Initial Review of Rmulatory Documents
14.1 Planning Commission Summit
Provide an overview of the planning and regulatory documents prepared in
Task 13 in a joint public meeting of the planning commissions for each
jurisdiction and COMPASS Staff. Solicit the comments of the planning
commissioners, and COMPASS Staff provide a list of the concerns and
suggestions provided at the meeting.
14.2 Planning Commission Briefing Report
Compile a list of common concerns and suggestions and a list of comments
that are inconsistent with each other. Provide a description of alternatives
to reconcile the inconsistencies identified in the Planning Commissioners'
comments.
Task 15: Initial Revisions
15.1 Regulatory Revisions
Revise the ordinances to incorporate the comments received at the Planning
Commission Summit described in.14.1, above.
15.2 Public Workshops
Conduct a public workshop with each jurisdiction relating to the package of
plan amendments and development regulations described in Task 13,
above.
15.3 Planning Commission Briefing Report
Compile a summary of concerns and suggestions from the individual
Planning Commission workshops.
Task 16: Final Revisions
16.1 Final draft ordinances
Based on the comments provided above, provide a final draft of the
documents recited and Task 13, above. Any further revisions to the
ordinances may be authorized by separate contract with the individual
jurisdiction.
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 7
43
16.2 Adoption
Consultant can provide support throughout the adoption process for each
jurisdiction, as requested, on a time and expense basis.
SECTION 2. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES. ADA COUNTY hereby agrees to pay
CONSULTANT $50,000 in one payment upon execution of this contract.
SECTION 3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. This agreement shall terminate in the
event that any contract between the CONSULTANT and the selected Project Coordinator
and/or Paul Hastings is terminated.
SECTION 4. TAX ON MONIES. CONSULTANT and/or its selected Project
Coordinator shall be responsible for all tax considerations arising out the payment of the
monies paid herein and each agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local
laws and to assume full responsibility for payment of all sales taxes and inspection fees.
SECTION 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CONSULTANT is an independent
contractor and is not an employee of ADA COUNTY. This is not an employment
contract. CONSULTANT shall perform its duties in good faith to ADA COUNTY.
SECTION 6. ASSIGNMENT. DUTIES under this AGREEMENT may be assigned by
the mechanism of the CONSULTANT'S selection of a Project Coordinator.
SECTION 7. BEST EFFORTS. CONSULTANT shall expend its "best efforts" to
discharge its duties hereunder.
SECTION 8. NEGLIGENCE/INDEMNITY. CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold harmless ADA COUNTY from damages from any and all claims,
demands or actions as a result of consequence of any negligent acts, errors or omissions
by CONSULTANT, its agents, employee, or sub consultants arising from the
performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 9. ATTORNEY FEES. In any action arising under this AGREEMENT, attorney's
fees and costs shall be awarded as allowed under Idaho law, pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 12-
117, 12-120, 12-121, and other applicable provisions, laws, codes, rules, regulations and/or
ordinances.
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 8
44
SECTION 10. DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED. CONSULTANT shall not
discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sec, national origin,
age or non job related handicap of because of prior military service of current military
status, and shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations and
executive order of governmental agencies relating to civil and human rights.
SECTION 11. GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State of Idaho shall govern this
AGREEMENT.
SECTION 12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: MODIFICATION. This AGREEMENT
constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto, and shall supersede all
previous proposals, oral or written negotiations, representations, commitments, and all of
the communications between the parties. Any modifications must be in writing and
executed by both parties.
SECTION 13: SEVERABILITY: In the event any provision or section of this Agreement
conflicts with applicable law, or is otherwise held to be unenforceable, the remaining
provisions shall nevertheless be enforceable and shall be carried into effect.
SECTION 14: PERFORMANCE/WAIVER: The failure of the County to require strict
performance of any term or condition of this Agreement or to exercise any option herein
conferred in any one or all instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or
relinquishment of any such term or condition, but the same shall be and remain in full
force and effect, unless such waiver is evidenced by the poor written consent of the
County. The failure of a party hereto to insist upon strict performance or observance of the
terms of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any breach of any terms or conditions of
this Agreement by the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this AGREEMENT, the
day, month and year first above -written.
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC.
By:
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 2006.
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 9
45
Notary Public for Idaho
Commission Expires
Board of Ada County Commissioners
By:
By:
By:
ATTEST:
J. David Navarro, Ada County Clerk
Rick Yzaguirre, Chairman
Judy M. Peavey -Derr, Commissioner
Fred Tilman, Commissioner
EXHIBIT A
Insurance
A. THE CONSULTANT and/or its the selected Project Coordinator, at its sole
expense, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect insurance written by an
insurance company or companies with AM Best rating(s) of A VIII or better. All
insurance companies must be authorized to do business in the state of Idaho. By requiring
insurance herein, Ada County does not represent that coverage and limits are necessarily
adequate to protect the CONSULTANT and/or the Project Coordinator, and such
coverage and limits shall not be deemed as a limitation on the CONSULTANT'S and/or
the Project Coordinator's liability under the indemnities granted to Ada County in this
contract.
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 10
46
B. Certificates of Insurance evidencing the coverages required herein shall be
provided to Ada County prior to the start date of the project. All certificates must be
signed by an authorized representative of the CONSULTANT and/or the Project
Coordinator's Insurance carrier and must state that the issuing company, its agents, or
representatives will provide Ada County thirty (30) days written notice prior to any
policies being canceled. Renewal certificates must be provided to Ada County within
thirty (30) days after the effective date of the renewal.
C. Certificates shall be mailed to:
Ada County Risk Management
200 W. Front Street 3rd Floor Room 3269
Boise, Idaho 83702-7300
D. Certificates must evidence the following minimum coverages:
1. Workers' Compensation insurance meeting the statutory requirements of
the State of Idaho.
2. Employers' Liability insurance providing limits of liability in the
following amounts:
Bodily Injury by Accident:
Bodily Injury by Disease:
Bodily Injury by Disease:
$100,000 each accident
$500,000 policy limit
$100,000 each employee
3. Commercial General Liability insurance providing limits of liability in
the following amounts, with aggregates applying separately on a "per
project" basis:
General Aggregate: $2,000,000
Product/Completed Operations Aggregate: $2,000,000
Personal & Advertising Injury Liability: $1,000,000
Each Occurrence: $1,000,000
Fire Damage: $ 50,000
The Commercial General Liability ("CGL") insurance policy shall be written on
an "Occurrence" form and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations,
independent contractors, products, completed operations, personal injury,
advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including tort
liability of another assumed in a contract). Ada County and its elected officials,
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 11
47
agents, employees, successors and assigns shall be included as Additional Insureds
under the CGL with the Additional Insured endorsement providing coverage for
Completed Operations.
4. Business Automobile Liability insurance providing bodily injury and
property damage liability coverage for not less than $1,000,000 each accident
limit. Business Automobile Liability insurance shall be written on a standard
ISO policy form, or an equivalent form, providing coverage for liability arising
out of owned, hired, or non -owned vehicles in connection with this agreement.
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN ADA COUNTY AND
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH, INC - 12
48
BLUEPRINT I for
Good 1 GROWTH
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Blueprint for Good Growth Consortium
FROM: Karen Doherty, P.E. — Project Coordinator
DATE: October 30, 2006
RE: Payment Approval
ITEM I. d.
Action Requested:
Approve the payment of the outstanding invoices for Paul Hastings for Services as detailed on
the following pages.
Background:
A billing summary for the services from Freilich/Lauer is attached. Approval for payment is
requested based on percent work complete.
49
Vendor
Freilich, Lettner & Carlisle
Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle
Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle
FreiItch, Leitner & Carlisle
Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle
Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle
Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle
Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Paul Hastings
Invoice
6
12
6
6
7
8
9
10
1432882
1428089
1436919
1443272
1447839
1457555
1464946
1468424
1474635
1482211
1489755
1496291
1501311
1505173
1514534
1518707
1521780
1528092
1539396
1548713
1551938
Blueprint for Good Growth, Inc.
Project Billing Summary
Paul Hastings for Consulting Services
Invoice Summary as of 9/30/06
Nov 2
Recommended Unpaid
Invoice Amount PaV Balance
580.00
5507.00
526,091.10
$27,475.19
$25,014.58
$19,369.50
$17,853.15
$31,646.58
$24,570.00
$15,828.97
$45,581.40
$13,604.53
522,879.58
56,646.42
$21,189.39
$1,435.88
$18,511.46
$25,941.80
51,981.70
$30,738.04
$8,292.67
$2,682.98
$9,653.86
$4,954.01
$6,624.80
$4,842.44
$5,123.78
$1,190.00
521,118.73 $21,118.73
$441,429.54 $21,118.73
Service Date End
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
8/31/2004
9/30/2004
10/31/2004
11/30/2004
12/31/2004
1/31/05; dated 2/17/05
2/28/05; dated 4/7/05
2/28/05; dated 5/16/05
3/31/05; dated 5/16/05
4/30/05; dated 5/20/05
5/31/05; dated 6/15/05
6/30/05; dated 7/25/05
7/31/05; dated 8/26105
8/31/05; dated 9/20/05
9/30/05; dated 10/14/05
10/31/05; dated 11/16/05
11/30/05; dated 12/19/05
12131/05; dated 1/18/06
1/31/06; dated 2128/06
2/28/06; dated 3/20/06
3/31/06; dated 4/24/06
4130/06; dated 5/16/06
5/16/06; dated 5125/06
5/31106; dated 6/23/06
7/31/06; dated 8117/06
8/31/06; dated 9/27/06
9/30/06; dated 10/16/06
Total Recommended Approved as of 9/30106
Total Project Budget
Remaining Contract
$ 755,000.00
$ 313,570.46
Notes:
(1) Approval for Recommended Payment will be sought by Consortium on Nov 2.2006
L:1Doherty&AssoctBlueprint for Good Growth Coordination1FLC FinanciallSept 20061bgg_tracking f c 093006
$0.00
Notes
(1)
50
BLUEPRINT FOR GOOD GROWTH BUDGET - KD review 101112006.
Task 1: Consortium Workshop_ (July)
Subtotal
Task 2: Initial Review and Analysis
2.1 Data Assembly.
2.2 Physical Assessment.
2.3 Planning Assessment.
2.4 Regulatory Assessment.
2.5 Growth Assessment.
2.6 Community Issues Identification
Task
Budget
10/1/2006
Percent Amount
Complete Billable
Total
$2,384
$2,384 100% $2,384
$5,960
$17,868
$19,868
$19,868
$9,934
100% $5,960
100% $17,868
100% $19,868
100% $19,868
100% $9,934
2.6.1 Focus Groups with Stakeholders $8,544 100% $8,544
2.6.2 Community Workshop (Oct) $9,240 100% $9,240
2.6.3 Consortium Workshop (Sept) $4,272 100% $4,272
2.7 Needs, Issues and Opportunities Report. $19,868 100% $19,868
2.8 Consortium Workshop (Oct) $4,272 100% $4,272
2.9 Interim Development Regulations. $4,769 100% $4,769
Subtotal $124,463 $124,463
Task 3: Alternatives Map
3.1 Steering Committee Workshop (Nov
3.2 Community Workshops (Nov)
3.3 Alternatives Mapping.
3.4 Consortium Session (Nov)
Subtotal
Task 4: Refine Alternatives Map_.
4.1 Steering Committee Workshop (Dec)
4.2 Technical Committee Work Session (Dec)
Subtotal
Task 5: Alternatives Impact Analysis •
5.1 Initial Analysis.
5.2 Technical Committee Work Session.
5.3 Implementation Strategy Development.
5.4 Steering Committee Workshop.
5.5 Alternatives Analysis Report.
Subtotal
Task 6: Select Preferred Alternative
6.1 Steering Committee Workshops.
6.2 Community Workshops.
6.3 Governing Entity Workshop.
Subtotal
$4,272 100% $4,272
$9,638 100% $9,638
$9,934 100% $9,934
$4,272 100% $4,272
$28,116 $28,116
$4,272
$4,272
$8,544
$22,948
$4,272
$7,948
$4,272
$40,730
$80,170
$9,638
$9,638
$4,272
$23,548
100% $4,272
100% $4,272
$8,544
100% $22,948
100% $4,272
100% $7,948
100% $4,272
80% $32,584
$72,024
100% $9,638
100% $9,638
100% $4,272
$23,548
Task 7: Preferred Alternative Implementation Strategy
7.1 Draft Implementation Strategy. $17,868 90% $16,081
7.2 Steering Committee Workshop. $4,272 100% $4,272
Subtotal $22,140 $20,353
51
Task 8: Initial Pian Draft
8.1 Draft Plan.
8.2 Steering Committee Workshop.
Subtotal
Task 9: Stakeholder and Public Review
9.1 Community Workshops.
9.2 Focus Groups.
9.3 Decision -Maker Workshops.
9.4 Optional Survey.
Subtotal
Task 10: Refine Plan, Draft;
10.1 Steering Committee Workshop.
10.2 Plan Refinement.
Subtotal
Task 11; Plan Regulation Adoption.
11.1 Plan Adoption.
Subtotal
Subtotal
TOTAL
Phase II ($350,000)
Task 12: Initial Assessment
12.1 Physical and Market Assessment
12.2 Regulatory Assessment.
12.3 Legal Assessment.
12.4 Market and Construction Assessment.
12.5 Infrastructure Assessment
Task; 13: -`::Initial Draft Local ;Plan; and;. Code..Revisions--':'; ::..
13.1 Land Use/Growth Management Elements
13.2 Draft Initial Code Text.
Task 14: : Initial Review.of Regulatory Documents
14.1 Planning Commission Summit
14.2 Planning Commission Briefing Report
Task 15: initial Revisions
•
15.1 Regulatory Revisions
15.2 Public Workshops
15.3 Planning Commission Briefing Report
Task 16 Final Revisions'
16.1 Final draft ordinances
Phase II Totals
Grand Totals
$64,571 95% $61,342
$5,365 100% $5,365
$69,936 $66,707
$9,638
$4,669
$4,272
$0
$18,579
$4,272
$18,875
$23,147
$3,973
$3,973
405,000
$19,787
$19,787
$19,787
$22,187
$22,187
$39,574
$59,361
$7,532
$15,830
$29,680
$34,927
$29,680
$29,680
$350,000
$755,000
100%
100%
100%
$9,638
$4,669
$4,272
$18,579
100% $4,272
100% $18,875
$23,147
0%
$0
$0
.$387,866
15% $2,968
60% $11,872
70% $13,851
0% $0
30% $6,656
30% $11,872
25% $14,840
0% $0
0% $0
0% $0
0% $0
0% $0
$0 $0
$62,060
$449,925
52
t
BLUEPRINT for
Good GROWTH
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Blueprint for Good Growth Consortium
FROM: Karen Doherty, P.E. — Project Coordinator
DATE: October 27, 2006
RE: Local Proiect Coordinator Report
Action Requested:
Attached billing information is for your information only. No action is requested at this
time.
53
Blueprint for Good Growth, Inc.
Project Billing Summary
by Doherty & Associates, Inc.
for Project Coordination Services
Actual Consultant Hours Spent to Date as
Invoice Summary as of 10/30/06 of 10/27/06
Invoice #
1240
1249
1254
1270
1276
1297
1312
1319
1331
1340
1350
1360
1372
1383
1391
1399
1408
1422
1438
1439
1449
1463
1480
1498
Total Invoiced to date
Date
Amount Name Hours Total
12/31/2004 $ 7,058.82 Doherty 1031.50 $ 113,536.75
1/31/2005 $ 3,529.41 Carroll 63.50 $ 5,516.89
3/9/2005 $ 3,529.41 Slupe 257.00 $ 8,467.88
4/1/2005 $ 3,529.41 Melander 22.75 $ 842.18
5/2/2005 $ 3,529.41 Piepmeyer 59.90 $ 4,389.93
5/31/2005 $ 3,529.41 Nemec 57.50 $ 3,965.01
6/30/2005 $ 3,529.41 Brosious 3.00 $ 89.16
7/31/2005 $ 3,529.41 Hackett 33.00 $ 2,247.11
8/30/2005 $ 3,529.41 Total 1528.15 $ 139,054.90
10/3/2005 $ 3,529.41
10/31/2005 $ 4,716.91
11/28/2005 $ 4,716.91
12/30/2005 $ 4,716.91 Direct Expenses as of 10/27/06
1/30/2006 $ 4,716.91 Admin 2004 $ 5.05
2/27/2006 $ 4,716.91 Meetings 2004 $ 23.50
4/3/2006 $ 4,716.91 Admin 2005
5/1/2006 $ 1,187.50 Meetings 2005
5/31/2006 $ 1,187.53 Admin 2006 $ 259.42
6/9/2006 $ 45,000.00 Meetings 2006 $ 390.83
6/30/2006 $ 5,714.29
7/31/2006 $ 5,714.29 Total $ 678.80
8/28/2006 $ 5,714.29
10/2/2006 $ 5,714.29
10/30/2006 $ 5,714.29
$ 143,071.45
Total Initial Budget Through May 31, 2006 $ 69,500.00
Extra Services Through May 31, 2006 $ 45,000.00
Total Budget Through May 31, 2006 $ 114,500.00
Project Coordination June 1 - December 31, 2006 $ 40,000.00
Remaining Contract $ 11,428.55
Prepared by Karen Doherty bgg_tracking_102706.xls 54
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
BLUEPRINT1 for
41 Good GROWTH
Blueprint for Good Growth Consortium
Karen Doherty, P.E. — Project Coordinator
October 27, 2006
Funding Committee Status
Action Requested:
For information only. This information provides you with a background on the funding status.
Background:
Non -Profit Status
The IRS has determined that BGG, Inc. is exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to BGG, Inc. are deductible under section 170 of the Code Ruling
effective December 23, 2004.
Tax Filing Obligations
Blueprint for Good Growth, Inc. is required to file information to the IRS. A six-month extension was filed
in Spring 2006 since the 501(c)(3) was pending at that time to verify which forms should be filed. The
extension is valid to November 15, 2006. Doherty & Associates is completing the required tax return
documentation for submittal.
Funding Solicitation Status
The funding committee is actively soliciting additional funds from the remaining participating jurisdictions
as outlined below.
Jurisdiction
Ku na
Star
Garden City
Total
Request
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 140,000
Responsible Funding
Member
Bieter
Peavey -Derr
Peavey -Derr
L 1Doherty&Assoc\Blueprint for Good Growth Coordination\Consortium1110206_meet_memb\funding_memo_100506 DOC
55
After the remaining jurisdictions have pledged their contributions, the deficit should be approximately
$100,000 if all contributions are made according to the table shown above. The funding committee will
approach private entities to raise this amount.
Mayor Bieter and Mayor Merrill are working to establish meetings with Idaho Power, Blue Cross, Blue
Shield, and Intermountain Gas. Mayor Bieter and Commissioner Franden will be meeting with United
Water (Greg Wyatt).
Commissioner Peavey -Derr and Commissioner Franden are working to set up meeting with Simplot to
continue solicitation of funding.
Funding Status
Following is a summary of the total contributions to date.
Name
Ada County
ACHD
City of Boise
ITD
City of Meridian
US Environmental Protection
Agency
City of Eagle
Total
$ 210,000
Notes
$50k for Phase I and $500k for Phase
II; $60k for Doherty. Addtl $50k for
Phase II in Aug 2006.
150,000 $122k for Phase I; $28k for Phase II.
150,000 $50k ea Phase I and II. Addtl $50k for
Phase 11 in June 2006.
50,000
30,000 $30k each Phase I and II. Phase II
pledged in July 2006.
22,500
40,000 $20k each Phase I and II. Phase II
pledged in June 2006.
City of Kuna 20,000
City of Star 20,000
City of Garden City 10,000
COMPASS Yr End Sweep 9,266
Boise River Flood Control District 7,500
#10
Hewlett Packard Boise Operations 5,000
Tom Ryder 1,000
North End Neighborhood Assn. 300
Total Contributions $755,566
Doherty supplemental.
Phase II
L \Doherty&Assoc\Blueprint for Good Growth Coordination\Consortium\110206_meet_memb\funding_memo_100506.DOC
56
Overall Financial Status
Phase I Budget
Phase II Budget
Local Project Coordination Budget
Total Budget
Less Total Contributions
Total Deficit (Phase II)
$ 405,000
350,000
154,500
$ 909,500
(755,566)
$ 153,934
L:1Doherty&Assoc\Blueprint for Good Growth Coordination1Consortium1110206 meet_memblfunding_memo 100506.DOC
57