Loading...
Minutes - 2006 - City Council - 10/17/2006 - Special EAGLE CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting Minutes October 17,2006 EARLY START TIME 5:00 P,M, I. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor calls the meeting to order at 5: 15 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: BASTIAN, GUERBER, NORDSTROM, BANDY. All present. A quorum is present. ROLL CALL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: PIERCE, JACOBS, ZASTROW, ASPITARTlE, MCCARREL. All present. A quorum is present. Bastian moves to add Bill McCarrel's appointment to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval after Public Comment. Seconded by Guerber, ALL A YES: MOTION C~ES............... 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 4. PUBLIC COMMENT: Jason Pierce, provides an update on the Chamber of Commerce's Revitalization of Downtown. There is a meeting 6:30 p.m. Thursday night at City Hall for business owners and operators for business downtown. Bastian moves to appoint Bill McCarrel to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Seconded by Guerber. Discussion. ALL AYES: MOTION C~ES............... 5. OUARTERLY REPORT BY THE ADA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE: Ax Yewer and Scott Bandy will review the quarterly report. Ax Yewer and Scott Bandy provide Council the quarterly report. Discussion on the process of reporting closed cases. We have filed 138 misdemeanor cases. This is comparable to the previous three months. Discussion on the types of cases filed. There have been 650 infraction cases. General discussion. 6. FOOTHILLS DISCUSSION: Mayor introduces the issue. We have several comprehensive plan amendments in the process at this time. Planner Baird Spencer: Tonight the discussion is about broad policy level discussion about how to guide and manage the City's growth into the foothills. Displays overheads and provides an overview of the study area. Tonight you are going to have presentations from M3. SunCor and NACF A. Due to a death in the family Collin Connolly will not be here tonight so he has request another time be scheduled for him to come. I have the maps that were presented at the scenario building hearings and the changes have not been made to these maps. M3's application before the City is a Comp Plan Amendment, Zoning Ordinance Amendment, and Annexation with a Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement. Bill Brownlee, m3companies, presents a power point presentation to the Council and Planning and Zoning Commission in regards to Ladera Ranch and Coto de Caza which have been developed in the foothills. Discussion on the development of these two projects. General discussion on foothills development. Planner Baird Spencer: SunCor is a Comp Plan Map and Text Amendment only. Page I K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\(( -10-] 1-06min.doc Mike Wardel, SunCor, discussion on the proposed Comp Plan Map and Text Amendment. We toured the projects that Mr. Brownlee has referred to. Presents a power point presentation to the Council and Planning and Zoning Commission in regards to foothills development. Discussion on the Avimor project. Discussion on landscaping and water conservation. Further general discussion on foothills development. John Petrofsky, 4831 Willow Creek Road, Chairman of North Ada County Foothills Association, I appreciate the presentations that have come before me. Presents a power point for the Council and Planning and Zoning Commission. Our Association was formed in 2002 to promote a comprehensive plan/vision for the foothills. Discussion on the process that the City is doing at the present time. Discussion on the 4 tracks to a common vision and plan. We are at a dreaming stage at this time and we can't be caught up in the practical details we need to have a vision. Discussion on preservation of habitat and wildlife. Discussion on traffic. General discussion. Request for the City to form a habitat committee. Mr. Connolly would like the opportunity to provide a full presentation to the Council and Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor calls a recess at 7: 13 p.m. Mayor reconvenes at 7:20 p.m. Tim Brewer, Director for the Local Land Trust of the Treasure Valley, the presentations were impressive tonight and a good deal of common ground. Discussion on how to preserve and take care of the open spaces. The Local Land Trust of the Treasure Valley is available for assistance to the City. General discussion on regional trails. Discussion Ridge to River's Partnership. General discussion. Chris Dailey, ACHD, we had the opportunity to sit on the North West Foothills Visioning Committee. We are not necessarily opposed to this but this presents a large planning area to plan for. We do not want to rush into this planning. These areas represent 80,000 to 100,000 people and trip generation is going to be very high and the development of parks and ball fields also generates additional trips per day. We have to look at all of these projects together. General discussion. Commissioner Aspitarte reads statements from the October 16,2006 letter from ACHD into the record. General discussion. Further discussion on ACHD planning for the area. Sue Sullivan, Planner for ITD, discusses the Communities in Motion long range plan. They came up with a growth scenario which does not include this area. We do not have the funding to build the infrastructure to support this area. Discussion on the numbers of households that will be in these areas. Discussion on air quality. General discussion on future development plans for State Street. We are not fully funded to acquire all the property; we only have funding for the study. Hwy 55 is not even in the long range plan. We have to figure out what these impacts will be and how they would be paid for. General discussion. Charles Bond, I have been on all of the wildlife mitigation plans in the valley except one. Public Lands can go away at any time; we need to plan for that. We need to identify natural open space, is it habitat for wildlife or for recreation? Discussion on wildlife habitat and natural habitat. The majority of the areas in the foothills are not in their natural condition. Discussion on the Avimor Page 2 K.\CQUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes \\lork Area\CT- IO-17-06min.doc Plan and the recommendations for funding for wildlife habitat and natural open space. General discussion. City Attorney Buxton: You have asked and received a lot of information in preparing for a Comp Plan Amendment. There is not action that you need to take at this time. General Council and Planning and Zoning Commissioners discussion. Mayor: We need to get some policies and goals set for this area. General discussion. Further general discussion. City Attorney Buxton: Discussion on LID's for this area. The City can only do a LID for its jurisdiction. An example is that ACHD would have to do a LID for roads. You may only be able to put an LID in 90% of the area. General discussion. Further general discussion. C.J. Thompson, 4831 Willow Creek Road, discussion on the wildlife sub-committee. There are people who live in the City of Eagle who have expertise in wildlife habitat. This is a really high value for the people who live here now. General discussion. Discussion on an independent water study. Planning and Zoning has a special hearing on the Comp Plan October 30, 2006. Jeff Petrofsky, I want some clarification. I understand the idea of getting all of the information together. What is your plan on noticing meetings for the Public on the Comp Plan Amendment? General discussion. 7. REPORTS: Zoning Administrator's Report: None City Clerk/Treasurer Report: None City Engineer Report: None City Attorney Report: None Planning and Zoning Commission: None Mayor and Council's Report: Guerber, Eagle Fire Department had their open house on Saturday and it was really busy. The Eagle Chamber of Commerce Promote Eagle Auction is this Friday night. I need some one to rattle (TD on the ruts on Eagle Road and Highway 44. General discussion. Bastian: Clean Cities Coalition this afternoon, provides a report on the meeting. Discussion on ethanol. I would like to see Dana start doing his monthly reports for the Police Department again. Mayor: Last night we were able to get a large group of homeowners associations together. It was extremely successful. We went over some of the projects that Eagle has been going through. They want to have quarterly meetings. This group will be valuable to get information out. I met today with Jim Everett, we are trying to find someone to lead the charge for the YMCA. We think that we have a landowner who is willing to donate the land. Commissioner Pierce: The Landing is doing "Paint the Town" on November 3rd and we need to get the word out to the Senior Center. They have 20 volunteers and they need houses. 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Executive Session is not held. A. Pending & Threatened Litigation: I.c. S67-2345(t) Page 3 K\C'OUNC'lL\MI!\iUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area",CC-IO-17-06min,doc B. Acquisition of Property: I.c. S67-2345 (c) 9. ADJOURNMENT: Bastian moves to adjourn. Seconded by Nordstrom. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES... Hearing no further business, the Council meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted: .b! ~~ 12u~.-/ ~ SHARON K. BERGMANN CITY CLERK/TREASURER Page 4 K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC -IO-17-06mindoc CO �d fl 5€ 1, GC' October 13, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Eagle 660 E. Civic Lane Eagle, ID 83616 RE: CPA-5-06/ZOA-3-06/A-14-06/RZ-19-06- M3 Eagle, LLC John S. Franden, President Carol A. McKee, 1st Vice President Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner RECEIVED & FILED CITY OF EAGLE OCT 1 6 2006 File• Route te,• Dear Commissioners, We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the subject Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment before the Commission at the public hearing on October 16, 2006. We understand this hearing was continued from September 27, which allowed ACHD to further discuss the proposal internally but also highlight the need for a reasonable approach to the land use assumptions. Pursuant to Idaho Code 40-1415(4), ACHD is responsible for the transportation planning in Ada County. In doing so, ACHD is required to consider the City of Eagle's Comprehensive Plan. As part of the City of Eagle's Comprehensive Plan review process, the City must conduct a transportation analysis in coordination with ACHD that shows the general locations and widths of the major traffic thoroughfares and the recommended treatment of the streets. See Idaho Code 67-6508(1.) In developing the transportation component, previous and existing conditions, trends, desirable goals and objectives, or future situations for the planned area must be considered. ACHD has been exploring the most appropriate manner in which to prepare a master transportation plan for the Northwest Foothills of Ada County. This area is bound by the Gem County Line, Beacon Light Road and State Highways 55 & 16. Recognizing the application before the City of Eagle, as well as information we have received from other developments in the Northwest Foothills, ACHD requested COMPASS and the Blueprint for Good Growth facilitate a discussion to develop a set of reasonable land use assumptions for the Northwest Foothills Area (see attached letter). This effort is needed as our research uncovered such variability in the proposed land uses that it prohibits us from continuing with the development of a transportation plan for the area until reasonable land use assumptions are determined. ACHD is neither opposing nor supporting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rather we implore the City of Eagle to carefully consider and weigh the transportation impacts, from a funding and operational perspective, with thorough consultation and input from ACHD, the Idaho Transportation Department and COMPASS. We do request that following these hearings, the City of Eagle not act on any preliminary plats within the Northwest Foothills area until a transportation plan is adopted to ensure that this development is consistent with the goals and objectives identified in the plan. We also request the City of Eagle, in cooperation with other appropriate land use and transportation agencies, participate in a process through either COMPASS or Blueprint for Good Growth, to identify a reasonable range of land use assumptions for this area so Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208 387 6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us 5 fJa'1 Foothills Mater Plan70p5'013 Eale M3 Coro PI1n 4r r -;,, P -Z Picie 1 of 2 the impacted transportation agencies can plan for a future system that supports the land use goals of the City. As with any effort of this magnitude, this will take some time. ACHD will comment on the detailed aspects of the traffic impact study supplied by the applicant as part of this application as the City's consideration continues to the Council level. The M3 proposal, when combined with other development considerations in the Northwest Foothills, clearly justifies establishment of an Extraordinary Impact Fee Overlay zone to fund the needed roadway system. However, this cannot proceed knowing only the impacts from one major development, as the cumulative impacts will be generated by many developments in the Northwest Foothills. A thorough concerted effort to identify these impacts, as requested in the September letter to COMPASS and the BGG, will ensure that the M3 development or others will not bear an undue burden in terms of financing the needed transportation system. Additionally, it also allows the Idaho Transportation Department, whose system will see the greatest impact, to fully assess their options and abilities to determine necessary improvements. The establishment of an Extraordinary Impact Fee Overlay zone for the ACHD system is the most appropriate mechanism to pursue as the land uses and associated transportation needs are over and above those shown in the latest travel demand model and associated demographics as established by COMPASS, which ACHD is statutorily required to follow in the establishment of regular and extraordinary impact fees. This section of the county is unique in that there is no existing local roadway system within the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment area, or in other reaches of the Northwest Foothills area. It also affords us the opportunity to fully plan and adequately prepare for development of this area. Now is the time to take the time to go through this process. We look forward to working with the City of Eagle and other agencies in this cooperative effort as our goals for the Northwest Foothills are the same—provide the citizens with the most efficient range of services to preserve quality of life through development that sustains the economy of the region for decades to come. Sincerely, John . Franden Commission President CC: Matt Stoll, COMPASS Eric Shannon, Idaho Transportation Department, District 3 Karen Dohery, Blueprint for Good Growth Enclosures S:\NW Foothills Master Plan\20061013 Eagle M3 Comp Plan Amendment P -Z Ietter.doc Page 2 of 2 ACI -11) Gfl»��siz;vt��C $ to vcz September 13. 2006 The Honorable Mayor David Bieter President. Ada County Consortium Blueprint for Good Growth clo Doherty & Associates 575 E ParkCenter Blvd. Boise Idaho 83706-6674 RE: Land Use Assumptions for the Northwest Ada County Foothills Dear Mayor Bieter, J:,hn 5 Fran.:e.-. Carol A. McKee, lst Vce Pr. esi_ :r. Dave 8 vers, 2nd Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Rebecca W Arnold, Commissioner Government agencies, including the Ada County Highway District. have been under pressure since spring 2006 to develop plans for the Northwest Foothills of Ada County, roughly the area bound by State Highways 16 & 55, the Gem County Line and Beacon Light Roadway. As the agency mandated to conduct roadway planning in Ada County, ACHD began examination of this area '.vrth the goal of developing a transportation master plan to provide a framework for future development and determine the appropriate funding mechanisms. We are poised to continue with phase II of the effort, which will outline corridor needs. We are requesting the Blueprint for Good Growth, through the Ada County Consortium, and COMPASS to develop a land use scenario for this area of the county so ACHD can continue long-range planning for the roadway network in Ada County. ACHD is making this request after our research has uncovered a great level of variability within the land use assumptions for this area. Below is a table depicting that variability ifigures are rounded to the nearest 1000). ACHD desires to have these assumptions by November 1, 2006 so that we can effectively and efficiently guide development of the roadway system in the Northwest Foothills area. Draft Ada County Comprehensive Plan COMPASS Communities in Motion City of Eagle Visioning Process & Comprehensive Plan Update Input from Major Landowners in the Area* Range of Dwelling Units 4,000 to 11.000 Potential Trip 40.000 to Generation 110,000 1,000 to 5,000 10.000 to 50,000 TBD TBD 18,000 to 21,000 130,00010 210,000 1,000 to 21,000 10,000 to 210,000 Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208 387 6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ac3.ic.us This figure represents approximately 600/0 of the buildable land area in the study area. The Idaho Transportation Department's facilities have the greatest potential for adverse impacts, but we have yet to receive a commitment from ITD to conduct analysis on the state highway system. We also request that the Blueprint for Good Growth and COMPASS solicit ITD's input on this process and assist in aligning the funding for that portion of the study. Needless to say, it is nearly impossible to generate an effective transportation plan with the kind of variability represented in the table above, and we are asking for your prompt resolution of this matter. Thank you for your attention and anticipated prompt response. J,! n S. Franden, President da County Highway District Commission CC: Frank Bruneel, Idaho Transportation Board Dwight Bower, Idaho Transportation Department Eric Shannon, Idaho Transportation Department, District 3 Matt Stoll, COMPASS Michael Lauer, Planning Works Karen Doherty, Blueprint for Good Growth } AC HD "Lsiirko) 10/13/2006 4:33 PM Facsimile Cover Sheet John S. Franden, President Carol A. McKee, lst Vice President Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner Deliver Fax To: City of Eagle, Planning & Zoning Commission Receiving Fax No: 938-3854 Total Pages: 5, including cover Comments: Following is a letter from ACHD Commission President John Franden regarding the public hearing on CPA-5-06/Z0A-3-06/A-14-06/RZ-19-06- M3 Eagle, LLC. Please include these as part of the public record. ACHD staff will be in attendance to answer any questions regarding this letter. Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208 387 6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us PRINT TIME 10/13 '06 16:13 ID:ACHD TIMER= --:-- FILE START MODE No. TIME 836 10/13 16:12 TX ERROR PAGE= *** TRANSMISSION REPORT *** LOCATION 9383854 FAX:1 208 3457650 .01;14441,it,, ACHD ' �io....►w�'ul�o 5eivriro 10/13/2006 4:33 PM Facsimile Cover Sheet U*****2AP 181 P STORE TX/RX TOTAL CODE PAGE PAGE TIME 5 5/ 0 00'54" OK John S. Franden, President Carol A. McKee, 1st Vice President Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner Deliver Fax To: City of Eagle, Planning & Zoning Commission Receiving Fax No: 938-3854 Total Pages: 5, including cover Comments: Following is a letter from ACHD Commission President John Franden regarding the public hearing on CPA-5-06/Z0A-3-06/A-14-06/RZ-19-06- M3 Eagle, LLC. Please include these as part of the public record. ACHD staff will be in attendance to answer any questions regarding this letter. Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208 387 6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us cc- /p -/`7-v& 1 HOME CAME TRUE 2 3 I I I I I I 30 1 29 I I 1 1 .31 1 32 GErsi COUNTY ADA COUNTY 6 11 5 1k:\7 �1 cl 1 o, - -i 27 I 1 T — 1 1 3 34 1 1 26 25 v� ' 30 � ra o0 36 18 19 30 LEgerd h a 1 1 1 16 1 15 1 14 1 1 1 1 21 1 22 23 1 f i 1 AVIMCR P.0 830 AC 29 27 26 1 1 Future Community Development Aim Conservation minded large acro porcds or clustared lots and open space Natural Area Open Spode A SanCor Planned Community 24 25 Area Summary 2,3:0 AC 2,725 AC 1,387 AC 3376 33 22% Told; 6,382 AC 10C% Hote< All areae are approximate 5 8 19 20 30 29 A AV I MOR • SAW 1,010 Couteptuel Future Land Um Map 5 O) 7 CO CEEHIGIEJSREL.11000EILli • ,t - - t, ;4. ii;• 4) 0 $ • - la a / i ,._ ®_:�) ,. U ,6-i\7-7ji \/7}-': - t—r ' L. ,« 2 D E \ £ a E R ( 2 _&E 5' « f ` \ _ ® § ; \ % l� E \ m .: . . , -4'1, ~ $ ..E&\5J\7 : a(7 _ \ 3 % : ^ ` ID / P y 7 : ! 3'I , ;G z ( >¥.2 \¥ , 6 [ • /« ` . - »f� \ / { : . . 2. . «a� . w 2 1 11 VIEW . EXISTING -CONDITIONS (vi.v: Fran HW! S , April 2¢, zoos 6:4spm, lsmm w+ s_mrn 1-2.15: AVIMOR 13 '‘,0' I EI'V 2: EXISTING CrUNDITIONS ••• •••=• •-•-• ‘..,11.--1,V 2 • PRO POS E Pit j C.T 1-,1rn $51-, ‘',• I AVIMOR 14 s... •�_ F J���j • r=te+ ',>, jiry.,._.,.. 15 ROAD 1)19-11LL • _ y _ s. 1-M-Moctlyttf-M-Stc-r? ROUNDED FINISHED GRADE CONTOU RS —--ESTN-E11SL tBED _ - TECHNIQUE PROVIDES LEVEL -Ste/PES--- BUILDING ENVELOPE WITH 16 \'I. \I:.iiI\1 .`41.01'1•. • ;-7 \.; I ) I:.'x'A .1)S f . • TECHNIQUE MINIMIZES FILLS AND RETAINING WALLS . '-IN DOWNSLOPE AREAS `FOUNDED J FINISHED PEADE CONTOURS BLENDED ,WITH EXISTING CONTOURS --A1tEAS OF DISTURBANCE �`- HOUSES TAKE UP GRADE THROUGH STRUCTURE_ (SINGLE -STORY Al' FRONT • 1NitMITA R'7Y1UV !VT' DSo0 17 75. ',•)1_1.)1•14. OF LOT DISTURRANC.F. 1-9DLTSE P.%D, DRIVEWAY. - AN -VI VTELITIES • 1 , , , • • i• 1 • / 1 AREAs OF NON- • • , _:;IcoSTURBANCE NSERVATION •.• ; - .11 PENTISE-117_1) • f 18 20 ( Rancho Viejo Landscape Vision • • • L ; , , , •fi C. 4.; • . ••••,'•: • :?n:1";?;:l..".;,1 • • • • . • ....ie.:. • • c: • r.kpo. r 4.54 Ca rho Goats CA.a.tratta. Wizt .5u.-itaLosagic7114.4-4? Mkt Rtiat#a? 1444.4e, eadc you okne, ustatmaizois Ilas? Arpg.t.o, 22 23 Irrigation With Treated Effluent 166,184 gal/yr — Typical annual United Water household use (domestic and landscaping) 11A q?O PIA,.- - Avimor minimum goal (30% reduction) 517 36 gal/y- — Rancho Viejo actual (69% reduction) • Rancho Viejo receives 12 to 14 inches of precipitation annually in high desert zone. • Low water consumption achieved through landscape design, public education and covenants. -.4.011111 • ' - ' '•••••:. • Ll • • T - -- • r.7.7,, z • • t. - T-.. - r.. • L :r t� _,:Lw CGir r,\ , r ROADWAYS DO NOT REFLECT t aq FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ` ' rpe- PROPER GEOMETRY \ % \ A.'s.' S. 1 7u1 •FI(rvo ^ae N �r PROPOSED CIRCULATION SYSTEM IGNORES FUTURE • HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE - es. .54 ARTERIAL CONNECTED TO LINDER ROAD EXTENDS 2 MILES WEST TO MOVE TRAFFIC BACK 2 MILES TO THE EAST PROPOSED CIRCULATION F Q DEPENDS ON TEMPORARY• E: ACCESS ONTO HWY 16 :.( ROADWAY SYSTEM SHOULD1.1 O - LINK TO PROPOSED MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES ��� • -� AND VILLAGE CENTER ."1-.." CIRCULATION SYSTEM DIRECTS MORE TRAFFIC INTO DOWNTOWNy EAGLE r.. �x es+ ,..'3 • '. 1445M-! 4.416.01. ROADWAYS SYSTEM WILL NOT RELIEVE TRAFFIC IMPACTS ON WILLOW CREEK ROAD I ti / - i ;U: •�aTl" I :/-; 11'1 I I 1 Iii irk.:: r �1 • ADA COUNT :1 1/4 OPEN SPACE CONNECTIONS ARE ARBITRARY. NOT BASED ON ANYTHING PHYSICAL OPEN SPACE DELINEATION DOES NOT RELATE 10 ANY ROAD SYSTEM 17.000 ACRE OPEN SPACE AREA $ . ' - WHAT IS THE CRITERIA FOR HUGE OPEN SPAC -WHO PAYS FOR IT? 4 -WHO MAINTAINS IT?*t - HOW IS THIS LAND AQUIRED? OPEN SPACE ON FUTURE HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE IS NOT LOGICAL Cull cr:m, PROPOSED OPEN SPACE OVER EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Yw�t tjtit''{{C Ii � '• •.:., . l�i.i�p i�� e � .S; E�^ T L 4 eslii.' . • +/- 5,315 ACRES OF PUBLIC LANDS n °4 • 41 .iGn, RD . / ter;. • '` 1 / 1'71 / \ j!' i- i • :n SECOND — SH166SH55 CONNECTION FUTURE CONNECTOR TO PROPOSED iii HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE Y! COLLECTOR SEkvICE ,•'(?•. TO HIGHWAY AND BEACON LIGHT ROAD ARTERIAL DOES NOT DIRECT TRAFFIC INTO DOWNTOWN DISTRICT MAJOR ARTERIAL DOTS NOT • PUSH TRAFFIC WEST • TO MOVE TRAFFIC EAST F/ �' 4.-; xr Aayk MAJOR ARTERIAL PROVIDES a. DIRECT ACCESS TO iv FUTURE VILLAGE CENTER 111 111 TUTURE • VILLAGE CEMER A C ID ARTERIAL wail RIVER CROSSING e:•co�• ��c��l ao I._v 1!-', SECONDARY COLLECTOR OFFERS ACCESS 70 DOWNTOWN EAGLE i :T ti Iw.4d "lr OUTER ARTERIAL LINKS WITH SH 55 s� l 0144 " _ \I til \ + t I I A. s -. �, �.�Y.{�.eY1r01 fxSY+,_. �al.a r, v v5.� +t: • fi,1}1 _ f. .,�y: yy'J, TR �''!'" t ? 1 la Sn.• A. r1 -1 C7ii 5. ., (Ali. .R mak 'Y K -.s._, C S. alikre .111111711: • :ufr fr' .4.101 • _ MP=':Cr 6r w�A �Yli ^..Yw a! < •;s _.'. As a comparative analysis we have overlaid four of the largest regiona parks in the Treasure Valley over the proposed City of Eagle Regional Park: • Eagle Island State Park 518 Acres • Julia Davis 89 Acres • Albertsons 38 Acres • Ann Morrison 145 Acres Total 790 Acres Question: 1. WHAT IS A REGIONAL OPEN SPACE? A. HOW IS IT ACQUIRED BY THE CITY? I. DEDICATION FROM LAND OWNERS AS PART OF PLANNING PROCESS? 1. WHAT IS THE COMPENSATION? A. DENSITY TRANSFER B. CASH — REQUIRE BOND PROCEEDS 2. WHAT IS COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE? A.IS IT OPEN SPACE FOR THE COMMUNITY? r U 3 Area A B c D - LYNN `\'JBETIS: 't f ` .<e77. )°1:i AREA+i4�'�" h ' ' M3 EAGLE ' • .•r-•., s? V14k ® • , AREA. C t4tlr SUNCOR HARMON c. 1 IJ Developable Acres 65% - 85% 20% - 35% 35% - 65% 47% - 65% Area Allocation of Density based on Ada County City of Eagle Densities A 79.60% B 4.10% C 5.80% D 7.80% Open Space Target 25% - 35% 50% - 70% 35% - 60% 40% - 60% Extrapolation of City of Conservative Moderate 25,649 47,782 20,417 38,034 1,052 1,959 1,488 2,771 2,001 3,727 Aggressive 51,299 40,834 2,103 2,975 4,001 Recommended Density as % of Area 79.6% 4.1% 5.8% 7.8% Eagle Visioning Studies Acres in Each Planning Area 17,400 9,100 5,100 6,900 38,500 Ave DU Per Acre 2.19 0.22 0.54 0.54 I II I I. III 111111IIi111if1�llll■ II1Illllll.ulll l it I�� 'I;" `} i a:. •.�'� E. 1 ill�iliih�lihliGnulii�ii011Wy - � �'-"-- "� .-..:- ,.. �_ _,. _ :. .._. ..... � ._ _.. �� ... �.....- :. �:•.:.:._ . -: •:; r_.. _. -_. ... .J ,121kh rfmniwkfrp7promprrmr,7,,•r_rrPrrrr-m7,..".rtirii: AL LO dAT I ON' OF DENSITY OVER L . • , . : • •1!: L GENERAL PLAN OBJECTIVES DEVELOP A GENERAL PLAN THAT PROVIDES THE CITY OF EAGLE ASSURANCE THAT THE CITY WILL BE DEVELOPED IN AN ORGANIZED, SUSTAINABLE AND AFFORDABLE MANNER. CREATE A MASTER CIRCULATION PLAN THAT LINKS PROPOSED GROWTH AREAS TO MAJOR TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS AND KEY URBAN DESTINATIONS. DIRECT TRAFFIC TO HIGHWAY 16 AND HIGHWAY 55 AND CONNECT TO OTHER ARTERIALS. CREATE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN HIGHWAY 16 AND HIGHWAY 55. PROVIDE MAJOR ROADWAY ALIGNMENTS THAT FOLLOW MODERN DESIGN STANDARDS. (I) DEFINE SPECIFIC ROADWAYS AS "SCENIC CORRIDORS" AND TREAT THEM CAREFULLY, BUT REALISTICALLY. W PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF DOWNTOWN EAGLE. CREATE EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE. U ENCOURAGE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL USES TO CREATE DIVERSITY AND AFFORDABILITY. W CREATE EMPLOYMENT AND RETAIL/OFFICE CENTERS NEAR EXISTING AND FUTURE ARTERIAL ROADWAYS TO CAPTURE INTERNAL TRAFFIC. W PROVIDE PROPER TRANSITIONAL DENSITIES NEXT TO EXISTING EAGLE NEIGHBORHOODS. O PROVIDE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE DEVELOPMENT NEXT TO OPEN SPACE AREAS AND TO ACT AS A TRANSITION FROM RURAL TO URBAN DENSITIES. CREATE MEANINGFUL REGIONAL OPEN SPACE AREAS THAT ARE AFFORDABLE AND MANAGEABLE FOR THE CITY OF EAGLE. EMPLOY OPEN SPACE STANDARDS ON NEW MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES THAT REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 25% OF THEIR AREAS AS COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE WHILE ALLOWING DEVELOPERS FLEXIBILITY TO LOCATE THE OPEN SPACE THOUGHTFULLY AND RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS. CREATE GUIDELINES TO ENCOURAGE DEVELOPERS TO DEDICATE MORE THAN THE 25% MINIMUM. CREATE MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND PROCESSES FOR LARGER DEVELOPMENT AREAS. .1$ • 14,-, 15v1,». I • ,,11,1,04,/, V1Vd1VN010321 310V3 ?.DVS NI3d0 %CZ -10 ygnrs4IFYIN V Viim Sl3n3- IV' d V 1N3W3'.'.N3 C3h.1A00 SiuNnowrOD 03 \ NYlc e315VvV SSiDOv V vN0 0321 b3A03DvdS N3d0 3SVRiDNI 83J5NV711 AuSIN3C 2,30.1d013A3C 1A.ISN3S ATIviN3Wr..06 AN] 1DVdS N1d0 %AZ JO VglIWINIVI V Hiim SIMJ1 ivld iNliN311;1N3 1V 03Nii3A00 S3LiNrIviv40 )C1NNY'd 4a1SVIN aOchaziOn MTA DIN3DS r G") m z m -a L Units Acres Population Potable Water Demand (MGD) Existing Requirements (gallons/day/developed acre) Irrigation Demand Moderate (gallons/day/developed Reuse Only acre) (area to be irrigated) Police Services ($) Schools -Student Gei Officers Sargents Clerks Facilites Outfitting I Total Cost Elementray Middle 4000 2000 11160 3.2 13682000 7526000 100 $ 892,800 $200,880 $ 52,452 $ 63,980 $ 100,440 $ 1,310,552 1476.9 738.5 2000 2000 5580 1.6 13682000 7526000 50 $ 446,400 $ 100,440 $ 26,226 $ 31,990 $ 50,220 $ 655,276 738.5 369.2 1000 2000 2790 0.8 13682000 7526000 25 $ 223,200 $ 50,220 $ 13,113 $ 15,995 $ 25,110 $ 327,638 369.2 184.6 400 2000 1116 0.3 13682000 7526000 10 $ 89,280 $ 20,088 $ 5,245 $ 6,398 $ 10,044 $ 131,055 147.7 73.8 neration Daily Vehicle High Trips 984.6 40000 492.3 20000 246.2 10000 98.5 4000 Sewer (Facility Costs) 10,640,000 5,320,000 2,660,000 1,064,000 Park/Open Space Acerage Park/Open Space Development Costs Library Services Cost by Development Neighborhood Community Regional Neighborhood 200 83.7 362.7 200 41.85 181.35 200 20.925 90.675 200 8.37 36.27 Developer Cost Developer Cost Developer Cost Developer Cost Community $ 20,925,000 $ 10,462,500 $ 5,231,250 $ 2,092,500 Regional Circulation/HH 27.24435 27.24435 27.24435 27.24435 $ 108,977 $ 54,489 $ 27,244 $ 10,898 „)) e_g CONNECTION TO EXISTING LIVESTOCK TRAIL ALONG CREEK CONNECTIONS , TO EXISTING LIVESTOCK '- TRAILS TRAILS .-CONNECTION r`' CONNECTION TO EXISTING /TO EXISTING 'JEEP TRAIL JEEP TRAIL ALONG RIDGE ALONG RIDGE ,CONNECTION r - TO EXISTING JEEP TRAIL CONNECTION TO EXISTING UVESTOCK ) TRAIL FUTURE EXTENSION rr TO NORTH \I FUTURE EXTENSION TO NORTH I ; CONNECTION 0� EXISTING 'BROKEN HORN” JEEP TRAIL _ THROUGH TO DRY CREEK VALLEY N FK. SPR/NG VALLE CREEK CONNECTION - TO HWY 55 ONNECTIONTOHWY55 THIS GRAPHIC WAS REVISED OCTOBER 20, 2005. DEVELOPMENT AREAS, TRAIL LOCATIONS, AND CALCULATIONS MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THE ORIGINAL P.C. APPUCATION AND FIGURES A SunCor Planned Community Legend PLANNED COMMUNITY BOUNDARY I NATURAL AREA OPEN SPACE (NAOS) IMPROVED OPEN SPACE (PARKS/SPORTS FIELDS/LANDSCAPE NURSERY) I I 40 © 0 OD OD 0 OD WWTP PRODUCTION HOUSING AND VILLAGE CENTER ESTATE LOT DEVELOPMENT WITH RESTRICTED BUILDING ENVELOPES ENFORCED BY DEED RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS PAVED SURFACE TRAIL GRANULAR SURFACE TRAIL GRANULAR SURFACE ACCESS ROAD NATIVE SURFACE TRAIL TRAILHEAD (SIGNAGE ONLY) TRAILHEAD WITH PARKING EQUESTRIAN TRAILHEAD WITH PARKING ELEMENTARY OR CHARTER SCHOOL INTERIM FIRE STATION WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR COMMUNITY PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PARK VILLAGE GREEN WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT Area Summary NAOS PARKS/SPORTS FIELDS ESTATE LOTS VILLAGE AREAS TOTALS Trail Summary PAVED SURFACE GRANULAR SURFACE NATIVE SURFACE 498 AC 60.0% 20 AC 2.4% 167 AC 20.1% 145 AC 17.5% 830 AC 100% 14,100 LF 16,550 LF 21,500 LF NOTE: ALL PUBLIC STREETS WILL HAVE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES. A AVIMOR' 0 250 500 1000 Figure 23A Open Space/Trails Plan