Minutes - 2006 - City Council - 08/22/2006 - Regular (2)
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
Minutes
August 22, 2006
NO PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HEARD PRIOR TO 7:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor calls the meeting to order at 6:37p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: BASTIAN, GUERBER, NORDSTROM, BANDY. All present. A
quorum is present.
3. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
A. Pending & Threatened Litigation: r.c. 967-2345(f)
B. Acquisition of Property: r.c. 967-2354 (c)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Nordstrom moves to go into Executive Session for the discussion of Pending &
Threatened Litigation: I.C. ~67-2345(t) and Acquisition of Property: I.C. ~67-2354 (c).
Seconded by Bastian. Bastian: AYE; Guerber: AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE:
ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES..................
Council goes into Executive Session at 6:38 p.m.
Council discusses pending & threatened litigation and acquisition of property.
Council leaves Executive Session at 7:44 p.m.
4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
5. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
Bastian moves to amend the agenda to add under #7. Proclamations and Resolutions,
Resolutions No. 37, 38, 39 and 42 as Item #7E, F, G, & H, and also add as #C.
Professional Services Contract with Harlan Mann and Ryan Armbruster. Discussion.
Bastian amends his motion to move the Proclamations and Resolutions to after New
Business. Discussion. Bastian amends his motion to move Resolutions #7 A, B, C, D,
E, F, G & H to the Consent Agenda. Seconded by Guerber. Bastian: AYE; Guerber:
AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES............
6. CONSENT AGENDA:
. Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless the Mayor, a
Councilmember, member of City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be
removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the
Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence determined
by the Rules of Order.
. Any item on the Consent Agenda which contains written Conditions of
Approval from the City of Eagle City Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission, or
Design Review Board shall be adopted as part of the City Council's Consent
Agenda approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Claims Against the City.
Page 1
K:\CQUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-22-06min doc
B. Findinl!s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for A-07-06/RZ-07-06 & PP-07-06-
Annexation and Rezone (with a Development Al!reemenU from RR to R-2-DA
and PreUminarv Plat for Cabra Creek Subdivision - Donald & Tricia Flvon:
Donald and Tricia Flynn, represented by Shawn Nickel with SLN Planning, Inc., is
requesting approval of an annexation and a rezone from RR (Rural Residential-Ada
County designation) to R-2-DA (Residential-two units per acre maximum with a
development agreement) and preliminary plat approval for Cabra Creek
Subdivision, a 26 lot (23-buildable, 3-common) residential subdivision. The 13.63-
acre site is located on the west side of North Linder Road approximately 1,500-feet
north of West State Street at 767 North Linder Road. (WEV)
C. Findinl!s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for RZ-ll-06 & PP/FP-02-06-
Rezone from A-R to R-E-DA & Pumpkin Patch Subdivision- Emmett Price
and Sons: Emmett Price and Sons, represented by Robin Labrie with Studio L, is
requesting a rezone from A-R (Agricultural-Residential) to R-E-DA (Residential-
Estates with a development agreement) and combined preliminary plat/final plat
approval for Pumpkin Patch Subdivision. The 4.94-acre, 2 lot subdivision is
located at 2820 West Floating Feather Road approximately 1,200 feet east of
Meridian Road on the north side of West Floating Feather Road. (WEV)
D. Findinl!s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for CU-3-06 - Conditional Use for a
Heil!ht Exception - St. Luke's Rel!ional Medical Center: St. Luke's Regional
Medical Center, represented by ZGA Architects/The Land Group, Inc., is
requesting conditional use permit approval for a building height exception of 46-
feet for a medical facility. The 14.49-acre site is located at the southwest corner of
State Highway 44 and Horseshoe Bend Road at 310 I E. State Street. (WEV)
E. Findinl!s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for A-9-05/RZ-13-05 /PPUD-13-05-
Lel!acv Planned Unit Development - Sil!nature Sports Development. LLC:
Signature Sports Development, LLC, is requesting annexation of +/-96-acres, a
rezone of 623.9-acres from A (Agricultural) and RR (Rural Residential-Ada
County Designation) to R-2-DA-P (Residential two units per acre maximum with a
development agreement ~ PUD), and conditional use, planned unit development
preliminary development plan approvals for the Legacy Planned Community. The
entire development consists of 623.9-acres (I ,359-residientiallots with 5-acres of
commercial and 131.02 -acres academy/open space area). (WEV)
F. Findinl!s of Fact and Conclusions of Law for A-5-06/RZ-5-06 & PP-06-05-
Annexation & Rezone from RUT to R-2-DA and PreUminarv Plat for Park
Lane Estates - Chad Moffat: Chad Moffat, represented by Eric Cronin, P. E. with
The Land Group, Inc., is requesting approval of an annexation and rezone from
RUT (Rural Urban Transitional) to R-2-DA (Residential two units per acre
maximum with a development agreement) and preliminary plat approval for Park
Lane Estates. The 5.14-acre, 12-lot subdivision (7-residential, 5-common), is
located on the west side of North Park Lane approximately 2,000-feet north of
West Floating Feather Road at 1835 North Park Lane. (WEV)
G. DR-56-06 - Master Sil!n Plan for St. Luke's Rel!ional Medical Center - St.
Luke's Rel!ional Medical Center: St. Luke's Regional Medical Center,
represented by Thomas Zabala, AlA, with ZGA Architects and Planners, is
requesting design review approval of a master sign plan for the St. Luke's Regional
Medical Center. The site is located on the southwest corner of East State Street
and Horseshoe Bend Road at 310 I East State Street. (WEV)
H. DR-64-06 - Common Area Landscapinl! and Sports Academv Facilitv within
Lel!acv PUD - Sil!nature Sports Development: Signature Sports Development,
represented by David Koga with The Land Group, is requesting design review
Page 2
K:\COLTNCIL'J\.1INUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-22-06rnindoc
approval of the common area landscaping and a 32,070-square foot sports academy
facility within Legacy PUD. The 228-acre site is generally located near the
southwest corner of Floating Feather Road and Linder Road. (WEV)
I. Resolution No 06-35: Authorizing the achieving of public records. (SKB)
J. Resolution No. 06-36: Authorizing the destruction of temporary public records.
K. Resolution No. 06-40: Authorizing the destruction of temporary public records.
L. Resolution No. 06-41: Authorizing the destruction of temporary public records.
M. Resolution No. 06-37: Authorizing the destruction of semi-permanent public
records.
N. Resolution No. 06-38: Authorizing the destruction of semi-permanent public
records.
O. Resolution No. 06-39: Authorizing the destruction of semi-permanent public
records.
P. Resolution No. 06-42: Authorizing the destruction of semi-permanent public
records.
Bastian moves to approve the Amended Consent Agenda. Seconded by Bandy. Bastian:
AYE; Guerber: AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES................. .
7. PROCLAMATIONS & RESOLUTIONS:
A. Resolution No 06-35: Authorizing the achieving of public records. (SKB)
B. Resolution No. 06-36: Authorizing the destruction of temporary public records. (SKB)
C. Resolution No. 06-40: Authorizing the destruction of temporary public records. (SKB)
D. Resolution No. 06-41: Authorizing the destruction of temporary public records. (SKB)
E. Resolution No. 06-37: Authorizing the destruction of semi-pennanent public records. (SKB)
F. Resolution No. 06-38: Authorizing the destruction of semi-permanent public records. (SKB)
G. Resolution No. 06-39: Authorizing the destruction of semi-permanent public records. (SKB)
H. Resolution No. 06-42: Authorizing the destruction of semi-permanent public records. (SKB)
The above Resolutions were moved to the Consent Agenda by a previous Motion.
8. FINAL PLATS:
A. FP-06-06 - Final Plat for Gladstone Subdivision - Gemstar Properties. LLC.: Gemstar
Properties, LLC, represented by AJ Lopez with Bailey Engineering, Inc., is requesting final plat
approval for Gladstone Subdivision, a 23-lot (17-buildable, 6-common) residential subdivision. The
6.92-acre subdivision is located on the south side of East Hill Road approximately I, 100-feet west
of State Highway 55 at 2511 East Hill Road. (WEV)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Scott Noriyuki, Gemstar Properties, we have no questions on the staff report and we are satisfied
with the report.
Zoning Administrator Vaughan: This is in substantial compliance with the Preliminary Plat.
Bastian moves to approve FP-06-06 - Final Plat for Gladstone Subdivision. Seconded by
Bandy. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES...................
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
Page 3
K:\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC -08-22-06mindoc
A. Idaho Power Open House Report: Layne Dodson with Idaho Power, and William Vaughan
Eagle Zoning Administrator will present the results of the Idaho Power/City of Eagle Open House
held on August 14,2006. (WEV)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Layne Dodson, Idaho Power, provides Council an update on the Task Force open house that was
held last Monday. We sent out about 300 notices. We had approximately 30 people who attend. It
was very well attend by those residing in the Linder Road area. Discussion on the options. General
discussion.
Nordstrom: On the issue of the transmittal from Ada County that the City Council support
the recommendation that Idaho Power has made to identify that and go ahead and build the
substation on the corner of Beacon Light and Linder Road. Seconded by Bastian.
Discussion. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES.........
Further Council discussion.
Bastian moves to go on record in supporting Route #2 which is up Highway 16 North from 44
to beacon light and from 16 East on Beacon Light to the substation at the corner of Beacon
Light and Linder Road. Seconded by Nordstrom. Discussion. ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES........... .
City Attorney: I need you to amend the Agenda after New Business to authorize the Mayor to sign
a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Trailhead property which is the subject of
litigation, a protest with PUC over a certificated area request.
Bastian so moves adding Item #l1F as authorization for the Mayor to sign a MOU>
Seconded by Bandy. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES................
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. RZ-08-05 MOD - Modification to the Development Al!reement associated with the Rezone
from RUT to PS-DA - Eal!le Sewer District: The Eagle Sewer District, represented by Lynn
Moser, is requesting a modification to the development agreement associated with the rezone from
RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to PS-DA Public/Semipublic. The modification is a request for a one
year extension of time for the completion of a portion of the required landscaping as noted in
condition 2.7. The 53.2-acre site is located on the south side of the State Highway 44 approximately
200 feet west of Ballantyne Road at 1993 West State Street. (WEV) This item was continued/rom
the August 8, 2006 meeting.
B. CU-04-05 MOD - Conditional Use Permit Modification - Eal!le Sewer District: The Eagle
Sewer District, represented by Lynn Moser, is requesting a modification to the conditional use
pennit previously approved for a wastewater treatment facility for the 53.2-acre site located on the
south side of the State Highway 44 approximately 200 feet west of Ballantyne Road at 1993 West
State Street. (WEV) This item was continued/rom the August 8,2006 meeting.
Mayor introduces the issue. Both issues will be heard at the same time with separate motions.
Lynn Moser, Eagle Sewer District, provides Council an overview of the issues. We are trying to
sell a corner of the property. We are trying to obtain the property to the east of us and we would
then like to continue the benn. We are asking for a one year extension on this berm. General
discussion.
Mayor opens the Public Hearing
Mayor closes the Public Hearing
Nordstrom moves that in regards to RZ-08-05 MOD - Modification to the Development
Agreement associated with the Rezone from RUT to PS-DA - Eagle Sewer District that we
Page 4
K:\CQUI\'CIL\M1NUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-22-06mindoc
approve the one year extension as requested. Seconded by Guerber. ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES................. ...
Nordstrom moves to approve CU-04-05 MOD - Conditional Use Permit Modification - Eagle
Sewer District relating to the Development Agreement extension. Seconded by Guerber.
ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES................
General discussion.
C. PPUD-OI-06/CU-02-06/PP-08-06 - Eudora Estates (a.k.a. Alderwood No.2) Planned Unit
Development - RTB Investments. LLC: RTB Investments, LLC, represented by Wendy
Kirkpatrick with Landmark Engineering and Planning, is requesting conditional use, preliminary
development plan and preliminary plat approvals for Eudora Estates (a.k.a. Alderwood No.2)
Planned Unit Development, a 21-lot (16-buildable, 5-common) residential planned unit
development. The 4.7-acre site is located approximately 430-feet west of South Grandean Way at
947 West State Street. (WEV) This item was continued/rom the August 8, 2006 meeting.
Mayor introduces the issue.
Mayor swears in Wendy, Kirkpatrick.
Wendy Kirkpatrick, Landmark Engineering and Planning, representing the applicant, provides the
Council an overview the project. We are an extension of the existing Alderwood Subdivision.
Discussion on the types of homes, the density, and the zoning. Discussion on the lot sizes. General
discussion.
Zoning Administrator Vaughan, displays an overhead and provides Council an overview of the
project. General discussion. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with
Conditions of Approval. The applicant needs to discussion preservation of the existing trees on the
site. We have provided to the applicant the City Foresters evaluation of the trees on the site.
General discussion.
Mayor opens the Public Hearing
Mayor swears in Jim Lau.
Jim Lau, 123 S. Grandean, the major question that we had has been addressed tonight, we were not
in favor of tearing down the exiting fencing along the alleyway. General discussion.
Mayor swears in Wayne Swanson.
Wayne Swanson, 985 W. State Street, I am the owner of this other piece of property and I do have a
developer talking to me. Discusses the alley fence and the widening of the alley upon further
development. I would like a fence put on my side if my property is not developed at the same time.
General discussion.
Mayor swears in Ed Rochnowski.
Ed Rochnowski, I own the property that is being developed. I was under the understanding that
should my property be developed this fence would come down and it was my understanding that
this was a condition.
Wendy Kirkpatrick, I just want to make sure that we have an agreement on the alley. We have
conflicting conditions. It seems that a cross access with this alley is impossible for us to meet.
General discussion.
Discussion on the City Forester's recommendation of retaining three trees on the site.
Mayor swears in Gary Stevenson.
Page 5
K \COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\('C' -08-22-06mindoc
Gary Stevenson, the developer, discusses the costs of the lots and trees that need to be retained in
accordance with City Forester's recommendation. Discussion on potential expanded development
with the purchase of Wayne Swanson's property.
Mayor closes the Public Hearing
General Council discussion.
Bastian moves to continue this application PPUD-01-06/CU-02-06/PP-08-06 - Eudora Estates
(a.k.a. Alderwood No.2) Planned Unit Development - RTB Investments, LLC to the next
regularly scheduled City Council meeting on September 12, 2006. Seconded by Nordstrom.
Discussion. THREE AYES - ONE NAY: MOTION CARRIES.................
Mayor calls a recess at 9:50 p.m.
Mayor reconvenes the meeting at 9:55 p.m.
D. A-10-06/RZ-12-06/CU-04-06/PPUD-02-06/PP-12-06 - Eal!lefield Estates II Planned Unit
Development - Eal!lefield. LLC.: Eaglefield, LLC, represented by Clint Boyle, AICP with
Landmark Engineering and Planning, Inc., is requesting an annexation and rezone from RR
(Residential Rural-Ada County designation) to R-4-DA-P (Residential up to four units per acre with
a development agreement and PUD), and MU-DA-P (Mixed Use with a Development Agreement
and PUD), conditional use, preliminary development plan and preliminary plat approvals for
Eaglefield Estates II Subdivision planned unit development. The II.5-acre, 34-lot (19-single
family, 5-four-plex, and 10-common) residential subdivision is located on the west side of North
Linder Road approximately 400-feet north of State Highway 44 at 341 and 499 North Linder Road.
(WEV) This item was continued/rom the August 8,2006 meeting.
Mayor introduces the issue.
Mayor swears in Clint Boyle.
Clint Boyle, Landmark Engineering and Planning, representing the applicant, we are essentially in
agreement with the Staff Report. Provides Council an overview of the application.
Mayor swears in Peter Harris.
Peter Harris, developer, discusses the project and they type of homes that will be built. We are
looking to provide some diversity, including possibly some rentals and homeowners. General
discussion.
Clint Boyle, further discussion on the project and the landscaping. General discussion.
Peter Harris, discusses drainage swells.
Clint Boyle, discussion on the conditions of approval
Zoning Administrator Vaughan, discussion on the conditions of approval. Discussion on the set
backs. General discussion.
Mayor opens the Public Hearing
Mayor closes the Public Hearing
General Council discussion.
Bastian moves to approve A-10-06/RZ-12-06/CU-04-06/PPUD-02-06/PP-12-06 - Eaglefield
Estates II Planned Unit Development with the following changes, 2.11 on Page 24 of 34 "the
front set backs we will allow 15' front set backs on alternating lots, and we allow 15' set
backs on lots with alley entries into the garages, on Page 26, Site Specific Condition #16 add
the following: "the existing house set backs shall be allowed" and on Page 27, Site Specific
Condition #28 "all curbs along Cardiff Way shall be vertical with curb cuts at driveways.
Page 6
K:\COUNC'lL\JI..fINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC -08-22-06min.doc
Seconded by Bandy. Discussion. Bastian amends the motion to include on the East side of
Cardiff Way, those homes that have shared driveways with side loaded garages, the set backs
shall be reduced from 20' to 15'. Second concurs. ALL AYES: MOTION
<:~ES................
II. NEW BUSINESS:
A. <:ontract Services with Garden City: (NM & MM)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Mike Mongelli, Building Official, discusses the contract services with Garden City. We are down
on our residential building permits. We have several commercial permits. Garden City only issues
about 20 building permits per month. They don't have a large volume as they don't have an impact
area to expand into. We are going to work out fees and percentage of those fees will come to the
City of Eagle. This will really fill in a gape at this time since their building official will retire at the
end of this month.
General discussion on Garden City's Public Works Department working with the City of Eagle on
putting together the City's department.
City Attorney Buxton: We would like to have the contract in place by September 1 st.
B. Floodplain discussion: (NM & MM)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Mike Mongelli, Building Official, discusses recommendations on an ordinance amendment and a
request for a moratorium. General discussion.
Nordstrom moves to direct staff to prepare documentation for a public hearing on whether or
not make a moratorium regarding the Special Flood Hazard Area. Seconded by Guerber.
ALL AYES: MOTION <:~ES...........
C. Professional Services Contract with Harlan Mann and Rvan Armbruster: (SEB)
Mayor introduces the issue.
City Attorney Buxton: Discusses the Professional Services Contract with Harlan Mann and Ryan
Armbruster. I recommend that you authorize the Mayor to sign these two agreements with Harlan
Mann and Ryan Armbruster.
So moved by Bandy. Seconded by Bastian. Discussion. Bandy amends the motion to change
the language in the agreement to say "such services shall not exceed $15,000". Second
concurs. Bastian: AYE; Guerber: AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES:
MOTION <:ARRIES..............
General discussion on putting together an Urban Renewal Committee.
D. Approval of expenditure for purchase of radar detector. (SJB)
Mayor introduces the issue.
Bastian moves to allow the Sheriff's office to expend $3,276.00 of which $3,000 will be
reimbursed to the City upon payment of the Grant. Seconded by Nordstrom. Discussion.
Bastian: AYE; Guerber: AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES: MOTION
<:~ICS..............
E. State ofIdaho Department of Environmental Oualitv Loan Offer. Acceptance and
<:ontract for Drinkinl! Water Treatment Desil!n and Construction.
Mayor introduces the issue.
Page 7
K\COUNCIL\MINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC -OS-22-06mindoc
City Attorney Buxton: I assume that you have all read this. This is the DEQ Loan Agreement for
the water tank and other improvements to the City water system.
Nordstrom move to approve the State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Loan
offer and authorize the Mayor to sign. Seconded by Bastian. Bastian: AYE; Guerber: AYE;
Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES.......
F. Authorization for the Mavor to sil!n a Memorandum ofUnderstandinl! rel!ardinl! the
Trailhead propertv.
Nordstrom moves to authorize the City Attorney to issue an MOU to Kastera for the
Trailhead Subdivision agreement for annexation and utility services. Seconded by Bandy.
Bastian: AYE; Guerber: AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES.......
12. REPORTS:
City Engineer Report: On Friday we received the two contracts from ITD on the Merrill Park
Bridge and the Pedestrian Underpass. They need to be signed and sent back to ITD as soon as
reasonable and they will then issue a Notice To Proceed. The actual construction dollars is 2008.
These need to be place on your next agenda.
We are doing a walk over with Mike Honnaechea and then we should be ready to go.
Zoning Administrator Report: I just wanted to make sure you received the letter from
Commissioner John Franden. General discussion.
Discussion on the Arbor Ridge Subdivision Letter of Credit.
City Attorney Buxton: Discussion on Arbor Ridge Subdivision. I talked to Fred today. They are
not done so they are in violation of the Agreement. They need two more days to finish their hydro
seeding. General discussion.
Nordstrom moves to cash the surety from PO Ventures to take care ofthe responsibilities to
finish the subdivision that they have not been able to do on their own. Seconded by Bandy.
Bastian: AYE; Guerber: AYE; Nordstrom: AYE; Bandy: AYE: ALL AYES: MOTION
CARRIES.......
City Clerk/Treasurer Report: Trautman's contracts for park and city maintenance are up in
November and there is clause in the contract that it can be renegotiated. I'm assuming that you
want this to go out to bid and not renegotiate the contract. General discussion.
Council concurs to go out to bid on the park and city maintenance.
Mayor and Council's Report:
Nordstrom: No report.
Guerber: Discussion on adding some street lights around the City. Go out at night. Mick and
Mike Echeita to work on this project.
I've seen a lot of dead limbs in the trees at Friendship Park.
Discussion on the abandoned Chevron Station building on State Street. General discussion.
Bastian: Reports on a Police and Fireman's Olympics meeting. The Boise Metro area is the only
area bidding on this.
Reports on the lunch at the Kiwanis Club. A task force is being formed on drug prevention.
Library is doing well.
Page g
K:\C'OUNCIVMINUTES\Temporary Minutes Work Area\CC-08-22-06min.doc
Bandy: Economic Development Committee is moving forward on their Downtown Study. They are
excited about the money that we have budgeted for them. Last Thursday morning they had
representatives of M3 talking about their plans.
Reports on the Eagle Citizens Water Committee which went real well. There are some very
knowledgeable people on the committee.
Mayor: I met with Bill and Cable One and they are anxious to work with the City to put their
cables underground. We are going to come up with a plan. They do not have fiber optic.
Tomorrow is the meeting with the Meridian City Council to talk about the impact area. Lynn
Moser will be at the meeting.
Someone needs to go the ACHD meeting on the Three Rivers Crossing which is in jeopardy.
Bastian will go to the ACHD.
Discussion on the meeting room policy. Council concurs that the Mayor should decide on granting
an exception to the policy on a case by case basis.
13. ADJOURNMENT:
Nordstrom moves to adjourn. Seconded by Bastian. ALL AYE: MOTION
CARRIES...
Hearing no further business, the Council meeting adjourned at 12:15 a.m.
Respectfully submitted:
,j l rAAA D -+- I?H A4'~~
SHARON K. BERGMANN
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
""," ..........
", "i OF ~ ".
........ ,. ,'\ ........ 01" .
~ v",. .. v( ,
~ I Y.POIl ..0 <$'> ".
: cP -1,,0..
:*: ~~:
:: : ...... : :
: \.... SE :.. :
~ f.ft. ..~ At "....: :
~ .)\..;: ,0, .. ~
\. -1)>b ~A~~~~..~O ,l
'. czo n~..."
.... F 1 v,,'"
11"",,,,,,,,
Page 9
K.\COUNCIL\MINUTESITemporary Minutes Work Area\(T-08-12-06min.doc
GENERAL FUND
$7,725,748
58.4%
TOTAL BUDGET CHART
$13,236,017
CULTURAL ARTS FUND
$138,732
1.0%
HISTORICAL
COMMISSION FUND
$49,000
0.4%
CAPITAL PROJECTS
PARK FUND
$880,576
7%
WATER FUND
$3,295,814
24.9%
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT
FUND
$1,190,590
9.0%
GENERAL OBLIGATION
BOND FUND
$253,000
1.9%
GENERAL FUND REVENUE FISCAL YEAR 06-07
TOTAL REVENUE $7,725,748
Programs/Events/Recreatio
n
$28,600 - Grants Misc Licenses, Permits &
0.4% $120,150 Fees
1.6% / $109,500
1.4%
Misc
$102,620 �_
1.3% Carry Forward from
Previous FY
1— — , I $1,840,959
Court Fines/Fees , 23.8%
$66,000
0.9%
Intergovernmental
$1,254,641
16.2%
Biding/Zoning Permits &
Fees
$1,952,049
25.3%
Franchise Fees -Gas,
Power, Water, Trash
$733,500
9.5%
Reserve
— $525,000
6.8%
Real Property Taxes
$992,729
12.8%
Library
$791,956--
44%
Revenue - Real Property Taxes FY 06-07
Totat Property Taxes $1,782,685
General Fund
$990,729
56%
c" c
Id State Treasurer Bond Fund
$250,000
3%
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE CHART FY 06-07
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $7,725,748
Reserve Fund
$525,000
7%
Community Planning Projects
$256,325
3%
Community Funds (Arts -
Historic Commissions)
$104,500
1%
Contracts
$861,981
11%
S.A.G.
$142,250
2%
Capital Exp.
$255,771
3%
Personnel
J $1,461,777
20%
Park & Pathway Development
$1,382,165
18% Grants
$120,150
2%
Administration
$406,988
5%
Law Enforcement
$1,349,722
17%
Public Works Department
$551,318
7%
Programs/Events/Recreation
$57,800
1%
cc Er
NAME
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET
Subject Public Hearing for Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Proposed Budget
August 22, 2006 5:30 p.m.
ADDRESS/
TELEPHONE
Page l of
H:I000NCILIAGENDAICCSIGNUP. WPD
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET
Subject- PPUD-01-06/CU-02-06/PP-08-06 - Eudora Estates (a.k.a. Alderwood No. 2) Planned Unit Development
RTB Investments. LLC
August 22. 2006 7:30 p.m.
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
TELEPHONE YES/NO? PRO/CONI
0YL-
/7 S. �Je-ccid4"ici A.Lky
/2 ...? Cj"'iir7C/tCi at c/ae-1 I` g
NAME
(4' ;� 11)
/41 L ci
hoc enf ase i
G A ( Sk_V(? rDS
L.16aadc_.�.--11-,
Page I of
I I COUNCILIAGENDAACCSIGNUP WPI)
v
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET
Subject- A-10-06/RZ-12-06/CU-04-06/PPUD-02-06/PP-12-06 - Eaelefield Estates 11 Planned Unit Development -
Eaelefield. LLC.
August 22, 2006 7:30 D.M.
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
NAME TELEPHONE YES/NO? PRO/CON
lap)- Rm u (rp.�ev u�a7 i►,� I
1 &f `1F±1 Ave Se -A Na , �6
Page 1 of
II:\COUNCII\AGENDA\CCSIGNl'P WPI)
�e5
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET
Subject- CU -04-05 MOD — Conditional Use Permit Modification — Eagle Sewer District
August 22. 2006 7:30 a.m.
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
TELEPHONE YES/NO? PRO/CON
NAME
Page 1 of .
H:ICOUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP. WPD
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGNUP SHEET
Subject- RZ-08-05 MOD — Modification to the Development Agreement associated with the Rezone from RUT to
PS -DA — Eagle Sewer District
August 22, 2006 7:30 p.m.
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
NAME TELEPHONE YES/NO? PRO/CON
Page l of .
H:I000NCILIAGENDAICCSIGNUP. WPD
%i;
City of Garden City
Nestled by the River
6015 Glermood (-garden ('its Idaho 81714
RE: Meeting with Mike Mongelli; City of Eagle
SUMMARY
I. Application -Inspection Process
Garden City will process applications as usual and transmit plan sets to Eagle and
inspection request sheets by 9:00 a.m. daily as applicable.
II. Plan Review
A. Mechanical -Commercial is done by RMI contract through Eagle
B. Garden City will transmit Commercial Mechanical plans to RMI or Eagle:
further discussion \yith Robert Ruhl on this for confirmation.
C. All commercial mechanical plans must have certified stamp -per Eagle
RQ's
D. Eagle will receive two copies of each plan set (drawings and documents)
from Garden City for plan review purposes.
E. Eagle will keep a copy of the approved drawings/documents at their
location and send the approved set back to Garden City.
F. Valuations: these will be included in the plan review done by Eagle: they
will assign an occupancy class and building type.
G. Calculations for specific fees from the "valuations" shall be done by
Garden City staff using the adopted G. City fees.
III. Plan Check by Garden City
A. Garden City staff will develop an agreed upon checklist for application
packets and drawings to verify specified items needed by Eagle for their
plan review process.
B. Garden City staff will only accept completed packets for plan review as
per the check list.
1. Site Plans
2. Residential -Need Res -check sheets
3. Commercial -Need Comte -check sheets
4. Architect letter of Cost Estimate
5. Licensed Installer ONLY -is applicant for all Manufactured ,-
Home Placement applications.
C'. Garden City PIannin�i2 I)i\ision will check setbacks during plan rcvie‘\.:
need to verify ‘vith staff.
IV. Commercial Plan Review Specifics in addition to above
A. Process to Eagle same as Residential
B. Eagle will process to their contracted review company.
C. Verify fee of 65% is covering contracted fees.
D. Process of Plans:
1. Garden City transmit to Eagle — 2 sets of plans
2. Eagle transmit to Contractor via air mail -2 sets of plans
3. Contractor reviews and transmits plans back to Eagle.
4. Eagle transmit to Garden City reviewed plans -2 sets
5. Garden City makes a copy of the approved sets and provides
Eagle with a copy -G. City retains two sets.
6. Garden City internal review is done on these 2 -sets of plans.
V. Inspections
A. Garden City will receive inspection requests on hot-line and send the
inspection list to Eagle via email.
B. Eagle will provide an email address to G. City for sending these.
VI. Signs
A. Eagle will not conduct review of Signs.
13. Meet with Robert Ruhl to determine needs and verily if planning review
only is adequate for this function.
VII. Ordinance Differences and Variations
A. Mike with Eagle will send identified differences to G. City "Delhie Block"
via email.
B. G. City will review differences and consider revision of G. City code as
necessary and applicable.
A SECOND MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED BETWEEN DELHIE AND
MIKE AT GARDEN CITY.
2/
CITY OF EAGLE
BUILDING
DEPARTMENT
Memo
To: Mayor. City Council
From: Michael Mongelli
cc: File
Date: 8/21/2006
Re: Moratorium Regarding the Special Flood Hazard Area
As Floodplain Administrator for the Cite of Eagle, Idaho, I recommend
the Council of the City of Eagle. adopt a moratorium on developments in the
Special Flood l lazard Arca, to allow the City staff, Engineers and City Council
additional time to address amendments to Title Ten (10) FLOOD CONTROL of
the Eagle City Code. At this time. the City's Hood Control. Title 10 does not
include modifications, fill or alterations that occur in the stream channel. The
minimum requirement as defined by the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 44 Section 60.3(d)
regulates the practice of placing fill in the tloodwawithout demonstrating that
the encroachment will not result in an increase in flood levels. \'While the Federal
Regulations have set minimum standards. it is up to local officials to assume the
responsibility for their flood problems and floodplain management programs.
Additionally, the City intends to extend corporate boundaries into
navigable streams located within the City in accordance with Idaho Code §50-
221. This action will extend the regulations of the City ON er navigable waters.
The objective of this action is to include the channels of the Boise River and Dry
Creek into the flood control regulations of the Eagle City Code.
A moratorium would give the City an opportunity to complete research to
revise the C'ite's Hood Control Title 10 to include the channel and refine a Flood
Impact Assessment Check -sheet that is acceptable to FI::h1;\, the City and the
project engineers representing the development community. The language and
worksheets that will be developed during this period \\ill impact not only today's
• Page 1
Eagle residents, but the future of the City of Eagle. A moratorium would not
affect any complete application that has been filed or plan that has been approved
prior to the effective date decided by Council unless the application or approval
was denied or has expired. A moratorium will not affect any construction that
would take place outside of the limits of the floodplain as defined by the current
Flood Insurance and Maps and the Letters of Map Changes issued by FEMA
prior to the effective date or approved Conditional Letters of Map Revision
(CLOMR) issued by FEMA prior to the effective date. Likewise the moratorium
would not affect an approved conditional use permit for development in a
floodplain ifa complete application for a floodplain development permit has
been filed prior to the effective date. Capital Improvement projects that are
proposed by the City, County. State or Federal entities would also be exempt
from this moratorium.
If the City continues to accept and process applications for development in
the floodplain under current Flood Control Ordinances, the City would be doing
so without fully assessing the effects of development on Base Flood Elevations.
The proposed amendments to the Flood Control Ordinances would provide for an
assessment of modifications, till or alterations within the stream channel. Such
assessment is critical to protecting against flood damage and increased risk of
flooding. If the proposed amendments are not immediately incorporated into the
evaluation of development in the flood hazard areas, the public's health, safety
and welfare will be at a greater risk of flood damage. Even though the 2006
flood season has passed, new applications are being tiled and development under
pending and new applications is ongoing. Therefore I recommend the City adopt
a moratorium so that no new applications be accepted and processed until the
proposed revisions are adopted to ensure that all development is adequately
assessed to protect against flood damage and increased risk of flood damage.
K:\Building Dept' lood IettcrsNoratorium flood Memo.doc
• Page 2
1
FLOOD IMPACT ASSESSMENT
SUMMARY CHECKSHEET
A Flood Impact Assessment (FIA) is a study that must be conducted for encroachments in either
Community. Encroachment Areas or FEMA defined foodwayc (City of Charlotte Floodplain
Regulations, Section 9-20(4) (a) (b)).
Type of FIA:
❑ Traditional "no -rise" study
For Office Use Only
❑ Date Received
Status
❑ Approved
❑ Not Approved
❑ Change in floodplain information
Increased Water Surface Elevations
FIAs that indicate increases in water surface elevations will require Conditional Letter of Map Revisions
submittals.
INITIAL INVENTORY LIST
NOTE: This summary list document should be viewed as a "guidelines" document and should not be
viewed as a policy -setting document. The applicant should document items on this list that cannot be
included or items that are not a plicable to the specific project.
t:.. sJa�• 0 4 `.; ro i1110g e
CJ All Flood Impact Assessments shall be submitted with a Floodland Development Permit Application
WrIgiFO.t.NaififiVagatraOsitof the" S
❑ Purpose
❑ Objectives
i 0 Brief history
` a .tk air
❑ Any observations or engineering judgments
O Property description documentation (including
details and project boundary references)
�,,�. v:GC-J-�iY-.v..-, �, :�'�`?�i...ii .f °J�A i��,%: f> •�}l�.
Submit digital information whenever possible.
❑ Existing and proposed topography
❑ Floodplain and floodway delineations (existing
and proposed) of a suitable scale
O Contour interval
❑
Planimetric definition
O Topographic map and all elevations must be
referenced to NAVD 88
O Cross check with FEMA benchmarks
O Reference basic property location
information (when applicable): street
address and/or legal description(s),
parcel identification number(s), etc.
❑ Floodplain (existing and future) and
floodway (community and FEMA) lines
accurately shown
Dra wings:
❑ S.W.I.M stream buffer lines and watershed
protection areas
O Any underground utilities, existing right-of-
ways, fences, and structures
Flood Impact Assessment Page 2
Channel Revisions
Must be certified by a North Carolina registered professional engineer
O Pre -construction topography and post -
The engineering drawings should include construction grading
a plan view of all channel revisions 0 Channel cross sections
including: 0 Channel lining
O Channel inlet and outlet
O Details for any accessory structures
❑ Cross sections contained in the HEC -
RAS models shall be shown and
labeled on the engineering drawings
Stream Restoration Projects with Significant Channel Realignments
Impacts to Manning's "n" values must be considered
• The meandering of natural streams, may increase the "n" value
as much as 30% (Chow, V.T., 1959).
• Cowan's equation [as presented by Chow] is often used to
estimate Manning's "n" values and is generally written as:
n=(n0+n 1 +n2+n3+n4)m5.
• The m5 correction factor is used to represent channel
meandering.
Estimating
"n" values
Classifying
degree of meander
Other
Considerations
• The degree of meandering can be classified as minor,
appreciable, or severe.
• To determine the classification of meandering, Chow states,
"the degree of meandering depends on the ratio of the meander
length to the straight length of the channel reach."
• The meandering is considered minor for ratios of 1.0 to 1.2,
appreciable for ratios of 1.2 to 1.5, and severe for ratios of 1.5
and greater. This ratio may also be thought of as sinuosity.
Sinuosity is the ratio of stream length to valley length (Rosgen,
1996).
• In addition to meander, the Cowan equation accounts for
surface irregularities (n1), variations in shape and size of the
channel cross section (n2), obstructions (n3), and vegetation
and flow conditions (n4).
• The Cowan equation assumes a straight, uniform, smooth
channel (nO) and builds on that value. The final channel
Manning's "n" value should include consideration of all of these
factors.
Bridges/Culverts
Must be certified by a North Carolina registered professional engineer
• The drawings should indicate the dimensions (height, width, span, radius, length, number of
barrels), shape, material, beveling or rounding, wing wall angle, skew angle, distances between
cross section, erosion projections, low chord of elevations, top or road elevations, structure invert
elevations, stream invert elevations, and cross-section locations.
• The cross sections contained in the HEC -RAS models shall be shown and labeled on the
engineering drawings.
Flood Im.act Assessment Pa :e
,IY/r • 11 1 rt -W1 I
•i�
Must be certified by a North Carolina registered professional engineer
❑ Include annotated FEMA FIRM reflecting changes due to project.
Provide all the data used in determining the revised floodplain boundaries, flood profiles, floodway
boundaries, etc.:
• Provide all data necessary to demonstrate the physical modifications to the floodplain meet NFIP
Regulations and the Floodplain Ordinance in the community where the project is located.
• Demonstrate the revised information (e.g. hydrologic and hydraulic analyses and the resulting
floodplain and floodway boundaries) is consistent with the effective FIA information.
• There must be consistency between the revised hydraulic models, the revised floodplain and
floodway delineations, the revised flood profiles, topographic work map, annotated FIRMs, and
construction plans.
Include hydrologic computations and digital files of computer models with the submittal
• This is necessary only when there is a change to the discharges contained in the effective FIA.
• This analysis must comply with NFIP regulatory requirements and must contain an estimated
discharge for the 1% annual chance flood (100 -year) for future land use conditions.
Duplicate Effective Model
• Include hydraulic analyses which
duplicate the hydraulic analyses
contained in the effective FIA (baseline
model) applying existing land use for the
2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100—year storm events,
and applying future land use conditions
for 100 -year storm event.
D Corrected Effective Model
to Include new/revised hydraulic analyses
updating the Duplicate Effective Model
with existing floodplain conditions
observed in the field, updated survey
data, including but not limited to channel
geometry, culvert/bridge dimensions,
Manning's "n" values etc.
• Provide a written description of changes
from the Duplicate Effective Model
(added cross sections, changes in
Mannings' "n" values etc.).
Proposed Model
• Include new/revised hydraulic analyses
incorporating the proposed improvements for
the project including but not limited to
changes in channel geometry, culvert/bridge
dimensions, changing Manning's "n" values
etc.
• Provide a written description of changes from
the Duplicate Effective Model (added cross
sections, changes in Mannings' "n" values
etc.).
• The Proposed Model shall include an
encroachment analysis for the local floodway
(0.1 foot) if proposed improvements affect
the local floodway and an encroachment
analysis for the FEMA floodway (0.5 foot) if
the proposed improvements affect the FEMA
Floodway.
❑ HEC -RAS profiles and tabular results as well as
a digital copy of the Duplicate Effective Model,
Corrected Effective Model, and Proposed Model
submitted. The HEC -RAS models must contain
analyses for the 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100 -year (100 -
existing and 100 -future) storm events.
Flood Im.act Assessment Pa•e 4
Flood Impact Assessments must be in accordance with applicable local, state and federal regulations
❑ Local Floodplain Regulations
❑ S.W.I.M. Stream Buffer Requirements
O National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Parts 59-78)
Cc e,-09�
Eagle City J all
310 E. state St.
Eag1, Manio 83616
(208) 939-6813 fax (208) 939-6827
Memorandum
Fax:
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Sharon K. Bergmann
CC:
Date: August 21, 2006
Re: ADD TO THE AGENDA
Please add to the Agenda under Resolutions the following Resolutions for the
destruction of semi-permanent records. .#7
Resolution No.37, 38, 39 and 42
Said Resolutions have been reviewed and certified by Steve Walker, State Archivist,
and by Tammy Zokan with Susan's Office in accordance with Idaho Code.
Thanks O
-\fA
From the desk of
Sharon K. Bergmann
City Clerk/Treasurer
RESOLUTION NO. 06-37
AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF
SEMI-PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORDS
WHEREAS, Idaho Code Section 50-907 and 50-908 provides that the City Council may
authorize the destruction of public records no longer required by law or for city business;
and
WHEREAS, On the 12th day of February, 2002, the City Council did approve Resolution
No. 02-04 which sets forth a policy on keeping, storing and destroying of City records,
proceedings and documents; and
WHEREAS, The City Clerk of the City of Eagle, Idaho has requested that certain public
records be authorized for destruction in order to dispose of them,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagle,
Idaho, as follows:
1. That the following semi-permanent public records shall be destroyed by shredding
under the supervision of the City Clerk in accordance with Resolution No. 02-04 and
Idaho Code 50-907 and 50-908:
Accounts Payables — Invoices and Vouchers
FY 86/87
FY 87/88
FY 90/91
FY 91/92
FY 92/93
FY 93/94
FY 94/95
FY 95/96
FY 96/97
FY 97/98
FY 98/99
FY 99/2000
FY 2000/2001
2. The administrative staff of the City, under the supervision of the City Clerk, is
authorized to take all necessary steps to carry out the authorization provided by this
Resolution.
Dated this day of August, 2006.
CITY OF EAGLE
NANCY C. MERRILL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHARON K. BERGMANN
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
C:1Documents and Settings\swalker\Local Settings\Tcmporary Internet Files\OLKF7\Resolution 06 -37 -Destroy Semi -Permanent
Records.doc
ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION
As city attorney for and legal advisor to the City of Eagle, Idaho, I hereby certify that I
have reviewed the foregoing Resolution No. 06-37 of the City of Eagle and that the same
is in accordance with Section 50-907 and 50-908, Idaho Code.
Dated this day of August, 2006.
City Attorney
IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY CERTIFICATION
As State Archivist I hereby certify that I have reviewed the foregoing Resolution
No. 06-37 of the City of Eagle and that the same is in accordance with Section 50-907
and 50-908, Idaho Code and said semi-permanent public records are not deemed to be of
a historical value and can be destroyed.
Dated this _17th day of August, 2006.
State Archivist
C:IDocuments and Settings\swalker\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF71Resolution 06 -37 -Destroy Semi -Permanent
Records.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 06-38
AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF
SEMI-PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORDS
WHEREAS, Idaho Code Section 50-907 and 50-908 provides that the City Council may
authorize the destruction of public records no longer required by law or for city business;
and
WHEREAS, On the 12th day of February, 2002, the City Council did approve Resolution
No. 02-04 which sets forth a policy on keeping, storing and destroying of City records,
proceedings and documents; and
WHEREAS, The City Clerk of the City of Eagle, Idaho has requested that certain public
records be authorized for destruction in order to dispose of them,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagle,
Idaho, as follows:
1. That the following semi-permanent public records shall be destroyed by shredding
under the supervision of the City Clerk in accordance with Resolution No. 02-04 and
Idaho Code 50-907 and 50-908:
Idaho Community Development Block Grant — Eagle Senior
And Community Building — March 1985:
Duplicate Applications
Duplicate Handbooks
Duplicate Project Manuals
Duplicate Forms & Correspondence
Blank Bank Deposit Books
2. The administrative staff of the City, under the supervision of the City Clerk, is
authorized to take all necessary steps to carry out the authorization provided by this
Resolution.
Dated this day of August, 2006.
CITY OF EAGLE
NANCY C. MERRILL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHARON K. BERGMANN
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
C:1Documents and Settings\swalker\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF71Resolution No 06 -38 -Destroy Semi -Permanent
Records.doc
ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION
As city attorney for and legal advisor to the City of Eagle, Idaho, I hereby certify that I
have reviewed the foregoing Resolution No. 06-38 of the City of Eagle and that the same
is in accordance with Section 50-907 and 50-908, Idaho Code.
Dated this day of August, 2006.
City Attorney
IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY CERTIFICATION
As State Archivist I hereby certify that I have reviewed the foregoing Resolution
No. 06-38 of the City of Eagle and that the same is in accordance with Section 50-907
and 50-908, Idaho Code and said semi-permanent public records are not deemed to be of
a historical value and can be destroyed.
Dated this _17th day of August, 2006.
C:1Documents and SettingslswalkerrLocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF71Resolution No 06 -38 -Destroy Semi -Permanent
Records.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 06-39
AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF
SEMI-PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORDS
WHEREAS, Idaho Code Section 50-907 and 50-908 provides that the City Council may
authorize the destruction of public records no longer required by law or for city business;
and
WHEREAS, On the 12th day of February, 2002, the City Council did approve Resolution
No. 02-04 which sets forth a policy on keeping, storing and destroying of City records,
proceedings and documents; and
WHEREAS, The City Clerk of the City of Eagle, Idaho has requested that certain public
records be authorized for destruction in order to dispose of them,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagle,
Idaho, as follows:
1. That the following semi-permanent public records shall be destroyed by shredding
under the supervision of the City Clerk in accordance with Resolution No. 02-04 and
Idaho Code 50-907 and 50-908:
Payroll Records including:
Employee Time Records
Federal & State Tax Records
Garnishment Records
PERSI Records
Wage & Tax Statements
Withholding Allowance Certificates
Deduction Records
For Payroll Years: 1987 thru 2000
2. The administrative staff of the City, under the supervision of the City Clerk, is
authorized to take all necessary steps to carry out the authorization provided by this
Resolution.
Dated this day of August, 2006.
CITY OF EAGLE
NANCY C. MERRILL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHARON K. BERGMANN
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
C:1Documents and Settings\swalker\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF71Resolution 06 -39 -Destroy Semi -Permanent
Records.doc
ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION
As city attorney for and legal advisor to the City of Eagle, Idaho, I hereby certify that I
have reviewed the foregoing Resolution No. 06-39 of the City of Eagle and that the same
is in accordance with Section 50-907 and 50-908, Idaho Code.
Dated this day of August, 2006.
City Attorney
IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY CERTIFICATION
As State Archivist I hereby certify that I have reviewed the foregoing Resolution
No. 06-39 of the City of Eagle and that the same is in accordance with Section 50-907
and 50-908, Idaho Code and said semi-permanent public records are not deemed to be of
a historical value and can be destroyed.
Dated this _17th day of August, 2006.
State Archivist
C:1Documents and Settings\.swalker\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF71Resolution 06 -39 -Destroy Semi -Permanent
Records.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 06-42
AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF
SEMI-PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORDS
WHEREAS, Idaho Code Section 50-907 and 50-908 provides that the City Council may
authorize the destruction of public records no longer required by law or for city business;
and
WHEREAS, On the 12th day of February, 2002, the City Council did approve Resolution
No. 02-04 which sets forth a policy on keeping, storing and destroying of City records,
proceedings and documents; and
WHEREAS, The City Clerk of the City of Eagle, Idaho has requested that certain public
records be authorized for destruction in order to dispose of them,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagle,
Idaho, as follows:
1. That the following semi-permanent public records shall be destroyed by shredding
under the supervision of the City Clerk in accordance with Resolution No. 02-04 and
Idaho Code 50-907 and 50-908:
Payroll Records for the following Payroll Years:
1988 - Employee Time Records
1990-1994:
Personnel Records
Employee Time Records
Federal & State Tax Records
W2's
Withholding Allowance Certificates
2. The administrative staff of the City, under the supervision of the City Clerk, is
authorized to take all necessary steps to carry out the authorization provided by this
Resolution.
Dated this day of August, 2006.
CITY OF EAGLE
NANCY C. MERRILL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHARON K. BERGMANN
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
C:1Documents and Settings\swalker\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF71Resolution 06 -42 -Destroy Semi -Permanent
Records.doc
ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION
As city attorney for and legal advisor to the City of Eagle, Idaho, I hereby certify that I
have reviewed the foregoing Resolution No. 06-42 of the City of Eagle and that the same
is in accordance with Section 50-907 and 50-908, Idaho Code.
Dated this day of August, 2006.
City Attorney
IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY CERTIFICATION
As State Archivist I hereby certify that I have reviewed the foregoing Resolution
No. 06-42 of the City of Eagle and that the same is in accordance with Section 50-907
and 50-908, Idaho Code and said semi-permanent public records are not deemed to be of
a historical value and can be destroyed.
Dated this 18th
Cr .6)0441 1
State Archivist
day of Au _ st, 2006.
C:\Documents and Settingslswalker\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF71Resolution 06 -42 -Destroy Semi -Permanent
Records.doc