Minutes - 2004 - City Council - 09/21/2004 - Joint
I~
Iìí '~.'.' .'
,-",
The City of Eagle
City Council & ACHD Commissioners
Joint Meeting Minutes
September 21,2004
5:30 P.M. at Eagle City Hall
v
ORIG\NAL
1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Merrill calls the meeting to order at 5 :35 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: BASTIAN, SEDLACEK, GUERBER, NORDSTROM. Nordstrom is
absent. A quorum is present.
ACHD Staff and 2 Commissioners are present for the meeting.
Mayor: I would like to amend the agenda to include Public Comment.
Sedlacek moves to amend the agenda and add Public Comment. Seconded by
Bastian. ALL AYES: MOTION CARRIES.................
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
Russell Vanliew, 97 Fisher Street, discussion on how development is moving out to their
property and the use of Eagle Road. This is the section of road between Floating Feather
and Beacon Light. It is getting much more hazardous for people who walk, ride horses,
jog and etc on Eagle Road. I'm wondering if it would be possible to add sidewalks and
other improvements to allow multi-use. General discussion.
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
A. Three Cities River Crossing (Eagle) ACHD provides Council an overview of the
project and provides an update to the project. Discussion on the different proposed
alignments. Discussion on the ITD proposed alignment. General discussion.
B. Urban Development vs. County Improvements (Eagle) Discussion on how County
projects affect the projects that are City projects. Discussion on the funding for these
large County projects. Discussion on the maintenance of the roads including the new
roads that are added every year. Discussion on Hidden Springs and the SunCorp
Development. General discussion.
C. Tree Trimming Policy (Eagle) General discussion on ACHD's procedure on tree
trimming. The Highway District only does what is necessary. A letter is sent out prior to
trees being trimmed. ACHD feels that tree trimming is the responsibility of the cities.
Letters will copied to the City. General discussion.
D. Community Program Criteria (ACHD) Discussion on the Community Program
ranking. We are trying to make this program more of a need based program. All the
information for this program is on our web site. Projects for the City can be put in the
TIP. There are four major categories. General discussion on the program.
E. City's request for signals as Plaza/Eagle Road & State/2nd Street (ACHD) Discussion
on the signal plans for these areas. General discussion.
F. Parking to Sell in ACHD right-of-way (Eagle/ACHD) The City has already passed an
ordinance on this. We would now like to get your blessing on this. General discussion.
/I,
'L~,'.
The City of Eagle
City Council & ACHD Commissioners
Joint Meeting Minutes
September 21, 2004
5:30 P.M. at Eagle City Hall
G. Discussion ofrevenue generated from Eagle vs. amount of projects approved and
built in Eagle (5 year work program) ACHD is presently preparing a revenue-expenditure
report for all jurisdictions that will cover this. General discussion.
General discussion on traffic issues.
5. ADJOURNMENT:
Sedlacek moves to adjourn. Seconded by Guerber. ALL AYE: MOTION CARRIES...
Hearing no further business, the Council meeting adjourned at 7: 1 0 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
--., uu"""
,-' OF ~ "«
~"'t ~.... '«
.,...' ... ~ ."..... () ~ ~#~
.:> v'" .. .. ~ ~
:- .. PO" .. <P ~
: .. o~ "-1;. .. ~
:.(.¡ ~.:
. . . .
: * : -.- : * :
. . . -
~ ..~ SEAL "': :
~ .r. ..(\0 ,""::
_V'~"I' ~.O"
.... .,r' .. ÞORA1:" .. ~ :-
'## -'1 ">. ......... ~, ...."
##,.1:11 OF \\). ...."
'" ...."
...,u....,..,
SHAR N K. BERGMANN
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
APPROVED:
1\1.
:lad kot d e ri 02: -
Walcit-A‘ Yit-e MA.
fC
- RECEIVED & FILED
CITY OF EAGLE
SEP 2 1 200
,s -t4 u -fra
12:-CaL,4-1A. (rt -
sv aLtAi
titLaAied,
14-0
71-o
ea.A-
SLICL
t
60/
,e46.ecia --froitto
co aa, 601v2,
(trk ryz e,0s.a.4 ot .15644 -et" of A ,
fr-444-1-3 ad -14i
0-
.44 -0,J -alt .1
1 -rt frt 0 bt
,T -(21/1-A GiZ egr
q3s-o67v
'"A�Q� �" Ada County Highway District
John S. Franden, President
David E. Wynkoop, 1st Vice President
Susan S. Eastlake, 2nd Vice President
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner
Dave Bivens, Commissioner
August 25, 2004
TO: Interested Citizens
3775 Adams Street
Garden City ID 83714-6418
Phone (208) 387-6100
FAX (208) 387-6391
E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us
SUBJECT: ACHD COMMUNITY PROGRAM: CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PROJECTS (Formerly the
Residential Streets Program)
General Information
This is an application packet for ACHD's Community Program Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Projects. Included with
this cover letter you will find all the instructions and forms needed to complete your application request.
To submit a request for a Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project, an application describing the project and a petition
signed by at least 80% of the property owners with frontage on the project must be submitted to ACHD. There is
no direct cost to property owners for a Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project at this time. Each impacted
property owner must donate the right-of-way for the improvements if additional right-of-way is required.
If the Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project request ranks high enough for funding, the timing for completion of the
project depends on the complexity of the request and is subject to the continuation of funding for Community
Program Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Projects.
Deadline for Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project Requests
All Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project requests are due to ACHD by September 30, 2004 at the following
address:
Ada County Highway District
Att: Planning, Programming & Cost Estimating Dept.
3775 Adams Street
Garden City, ID 83714
Applications received on or before the September 30, 2004 deadline will be ranked for inclusion in the 2006-
2010 Five -Year Work Program update. This update will identify Community Program Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk
projects to be constructed in years 2006 & 2007. This is an interim process based on a trial prioritization method
that is meant to rank projects on need rather than request. This process may or may not continue year-to-year
based on Commission direction.
It is anticipated that the Five -Year Work Program will be adopted by the Commission in January 2005.
Recommendations for projects in 2006 will then carry into the 2006 Budget, which will likely be adopted in
August of 2005. Requests received after September 30, 2004 will be evaluated when the Five -Year Work
Program is updated in fall of 2005. These deadlines are tentative as the Community Program prioritization
process is in transition and will be re-evaluated on an annual basis.
Projects Eligible for the Residential Street Proiects Program
The following criteria must be met for a request to be eligible for the Residential Street Projects program:
1 The request must be for improvements to streets classified as residential or local streets, as defined by
the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS). The ACHD Commissioners
may consider sidewalk improvements on collector roadways on a case-by-case basis (e.g. route to
school, park, senior center, etc.).
2. The properties adjacent to the street must be zoned residential unless the project is on a direct route to
a school or other community gathering places.
3. The requested improvements must be within the public right-of-way and correct deficiencies in
pedestrian, bicycle or vehicle facilities.
The following list shows types of projects eligible for the Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk program.
Examples of Eligible Projects
Construction of new curb, gutter and sidewalk
Construction of new sidewalk or replacement of damaged sidewalk next to already existing curb and gutter
Repairing or repaving a street for pedestrian safety
Paving a shoulder of a street for pedestrian safety
Installing pedestrian ramps to meet ADA accessibility requirements
Traffic calming measures (speed humps, stops signs, bulb -outs, etc.) Subject to criteria of the Traffic Calming Program
ACHD no longer considers Alley Paving projects as part of Community Program: Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk
Projects.
How ACHD Ranks Proiect Requests
In 2004, ACHD revised how these projects are ranked and refined what types of projects are eligible for funding
under this program. A Public Workshop was held in April 2004 to engage the public in how these projects are
identified for funding. The results of this Workshop, as well as links describing the process, can be found at:
http://www.achd.ada.id.us/Departments/ppce/community_prioritization.asp
ACHD staff prioritizes each project request to see how it fits in the Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk program. There
are 11 factors considered in ranking projects:
• Average Daily Traffic
• Existing Pedestrian Facilities
• Proximity to Schools and Public Gathering Places
• Cost
• Existing Roadway Drainage Facilities
• Right-of-way from Impacted Property Owners
• Availability of Non-ACHD Funds for Project
Prior Resources Expended on Project
• Agency (City or County) Support of Project
• Geographic Equity by City
• Likelihood of Area Development or Redevelopment
ACHD collects data related to the project for these 11 factors and each factor has a maximum number of points
available. Once the ranking has been completed, projects are then selected from this prioritized list and
submitted to the ACHD Commission for approval as part of the 2006-2010 Five -Year Work Program. Once the
Commission approves the program, ACHD will notify applicants to inform them of the status of their request.
Please see the above web site link for more information on the 11 factors used to rank projects. For more
information on the prioritization process, please contact ACHD's Planning, Programming and Cost Estimating
Department at (208) 387-6119.
Residential Street Projects Application
1. Submitted By:
Date:
Phone:
2. Is this request for:
O New Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk (may require a full rebuild of street)
O Addition or replacement of Sidewalk adjacent to existing curb and gutter
O Other Residential Street Improvements, Describe Below
O Traffic Calming
By signing this petition, I support the installation of speed humps, or other traffic calming measures,
on the street listed below. I understand that the location of speed humps, warning signs, or other
devices will be placed based on Engineering factors, not the preferences of adjacent property
owners.
3. Location of proposed project. List the street(s) and closest cross streets, addresses or distances.
Name of Street i From To
4. Describe the proposed project. What improvements are being requested? Are improvements on both sides
of the street?
5. Additional comments
6. Please identify any schools, parks, senior centers or other community gathering places near
the proposed project, including approximate distance.
1
7. Draw a sketch showing the project location (include major cross streets), boundaries, requested
improvements and any other significant geographical features.
8. Petition. Complete the attached petition to be signed by at least 80% of the property owners with parcels
fronting the proposed project. Note: To receive the maximum number of points for Right -of -Way
contribution, the petition should be signed by at least 90% of impacted property owners.
For general questions and project ranking, contact:
Planning, Programming and Cost Estimating
Ada County Highway District
3775 Adams Street
Garden City, ID 83714
(208) 387-6119
For project specifics, (cost, feasibility, etc.) contact:
Design/Survey Division
Ada County Highway District
3775 Adams Street
Garden City, ID 83714
(208) 387-6140
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Residential Street Projects Petition
Project Name:
Name (printed) Signature Street Address
Own Support Will
or Project donate
Rent (Yes, Right -of -
No) Way if
needed?
(Yes, No)
31
32
33
34
45
36
Residential Street Projects Petition
Project Name:
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
(7C q-_.2
;; , Planning, Programming & Cost Estimating
Ate: Summary Sheet
Community Program Prioritization
This draft is a proposed method to rank Curb. Gutter and Sidewalk projects contained in
the Community Program portion of the Five -Year Work Program (FWYP). The method is
designed to evaluate projects on local roadways and/or collectors, pending direction
from the ACHD Commission. A total of 100 points is available for each project. Projects
are then ranked according to accumulated points.
Technical Criteria
The following is a listing of Technical variables, which are based on an engineering
assessment of projects. There are two sections of the Technical Criteria—Safety Factors
and Cost -related Factors. A maximum of 50 points. or 50% of the total is possible from
the Technical Criteria section.
Safety Factors (Max. 30 points)
Traffic Exposure Rate (10 points): This criterion considers the ADT
(Average Daily Traffic) for streets. Streets with higher traffic volumes have a
greater need for safe pedestrian facilities because of a higher potential for
accidents.
10 pts: Greater than 4,000 ADT
8 pts: 3,000 to 3,999 ADT
6 pts: 2.000 to 2,999 ADT
4 pts: 1,000 to 1,999 ADT
2 pts: 251 to 999 ADT
0 pts: 0 to 250 ADT
Existing Pedestrian Facilities (10 points): This category gives
consideration to the existing surfaces that can be utilized by pedestrians.
10 pts: No existing gravel or paved shoulder
8 pts: Greater than 5 -foot Gravel shoulder
6 pts: Greater than 5 -foot Paved shoulder
4 pts: Separated pathway or shoulder outside R/W
2 pts: Separated pathway in existing R/W
0 pts: Existing functional sidewalk, pathway with barrier
Proximity to School. Park or Other Gathering Place (10 points): Projects
in close proximity to school and community gathering places are likely to
have the highest pedestrian volumes. Points are based on proximity.
10 pts: Within 1/2 mile from Elementary School.
8 pts: Within 1/2 mile to 1 mile from Elementary School; or within 1/2
mile from Junior High or High School: or within 1/2 mile of a
major community gathering place (park. senior center.
boys/girls club, etc.)
6 pts: Within lmile to 1.5 miles from Elementary School, or within
1/2 to 1 mile from Junior High or High School
4 pts: Within 1/2 mile to 1 mile of a community gathering place
2 pts: Within 1 mile to 1.5 mile radius of a junior high, high school,
or community gathering place.
0 pts: No schools or community facilities within 1.5 miles.
Il. Plan \Piognun l ummwun P.41111'11011 2( )414 :\hni \\ rh Pt.,un ['Florin/anon
Cre;ucd or1 4 nUa .25') un P\I
4,4 , Planning, Programming & Cost Estimating
•
Summary Sheet
Cost -related Factors (Max. 20 points)
Cost per Mile of Street Improvement (10 points) Category represents
estimated cost per mile of improvements related specifically to the proposed
project.
10 pts: Less than $250,000/mile
8 pts: $250,001/mile to $500,000/mile
6 pts: Greater than $500,000/mile to $750,000 /mile
4 pts: Greater than $750,000/mile to $1.0 million/mile
2 pts: Greater than $1.0 million/mile to $1.5 million/mile
0 pts: Greater than $1.5 million/mile
External Drainage System Factor (10 points): This category considers the
ability of the proposed project to tie into an already existing roadway drainage
system that is external to the project. If the proposed project can tie into an
existing external system, it increases the feasibility of the project.
10 pts: Adequate existing roadway drainage facilities for project
(no concerns)
5 pts: Existing roadway drainage facilities require some upgrade
0 pts: No existing roadway drainage facilities or existing facilities
are problematic
Partnerships Criteria (Max. 20 points)
Contributions of right-of-way from the property owners directly impacted by Curb, Gutter.
Sidewalk projects is essential to proceed with a project. ACHD is also seeking funding
partnerships with cities, urban renewal agencies and private entities. These factors
account for the contributions of property and funds to particular projects.
Right -of -Way (R/W) Factor (10 points): Support of greater than 80% of
property owners is the traditional threshold applied to projects before work
can be done. This criterion gives more points to locations with enough
existing right-of-way or where there is support to provide right-of-way.
10 pts: No R/W required; or Requires R/W and more than 90%
of property owners will donate the necessary R/W.
6 pts: Requires additional R/W and between 80% and 90% of
property owners will donate the necessary R/W.
0 pts: Requires additional R/W and less than 80% of property
owners support
Leveraging non-ACHD Funds (10 points): Points are based on grants,
road trust funds, individual support and other outside sources.
10 pts: Major funds available (Greater than 40% of total cost)
8 pts: Moderate funds available (30% to 40%)
6 pts: Some funds available (20% to 30%)
4 pts: Limited funds available (10% to 20%)
2 pts: Small portion of funds available (1% to 10%)
0 pts: No outside resources available
O I'lau\Pm_i.int t I'_nt Priori 2t10- April _N \\o-k.Iiop \\ <h I',.>nup (onnuunm IIov.ranl I'noriuiauon Cmrna dor
CtcatrJ on 4 21 2n14 2 50 no pm
Pt,c-013
-4111,•e Planning, Programming & Cost Estimating
Summary Sheet
Programming Criteria (Max. 30 points)
The following is a listing of the variables used to calculate the Programming points.
These factors measure ACHD's prior commitments to projects and development
potential, as well as factors related to the six cities and county served by ACHD.
Prior Resources Expended (10 points): This criterion represents ACHD's
financial commitment to the project through resources applied in prior years.
10 pts: Design and right-of-way complete
8 pts: Design and/or right-of-way started
6 pts: Concept work or study complete
4 pts: Integral part of another project or advanced investigation
work complete
2 pts. Some investigation work completed
0 pts: No resources expended
Outside Agency Support (10 points): Level of support from outside
agencies are part of the annual Five -Year Work Program request process.
10 pts: Project ranked as #1 priority of an agency
8 pts: Project ranked as #2 priority of an agency
6 pts: Project ranked as #3 priority of an agency
4 pts: Project ranked as #4 priority of an agency
2 pts: Project ranked as #5 priority of agency
0 pts: Project ranked lower than #5 by agency or opposed by
agency or public
Geographic Equity (5 points): Attempts to distribute work around Ada
County proportionate to the population base and dollars spent per area over
the history of the program (1994-2003). The six cities and unincorporated
Ada County are shown below as functions of total population and total RSP
dollars spent. Note, the figures for expenditures are still being examined and
are expected to change slightly prior to FY 2005 Budget:
5 pts: Less than $10 per capita (Meridian & Uninc. Ada Co.)
4 pts: $10 to $20 per capita
3 pts: $20 to $30 per capita (Eagle)
2 pts: $30 to $40 per capita
1 pt: $40 to $50 per capita (Star & Boise)
0 pts: Greater than $50 per capita (Kuna & Garden City)
Development Potential (5 points): Evaluates the potential for properties
within the project limits to develop or redevelop. New development/
redevelopment is required to construct sidewalks along their property. Areas
that have high development or redevelopment potential will be awarded fewer
points.
5 pts: Area is built out and has low potential for
development/redevelopment.
3 pts: Parts of project have potential for
development/redevelopment.
0 pts: A significant portion within the project limits are likely to
develop/redevelop.
): Pl.ut.l'tugrxm Cuiumuutn Pain Pi 20[14 April 2N \\utLshup Web Puaine lumnwnii PtPrturmzatiun ( rile>ta kluc
Ci ealed on 4 21 2(104 2 59-00 PNI
Page of
6/1/2004 15:05
Project Information
Project Name
15th Street, Ada/Irene
Chrlsway, Boise Ave/1606
Chrisway
Howe St., Priest/Londoner
Lubkin, Bruins/Curtis Frontage &
Bruins, Lubkin/Northview
Sloan St., BogarURoe
Attached sidewalk from S. end to N @ softball field, 10' detaches
SW from softball field to service road.
koad Trust Money (522,000). Staff has staked RIW.
i
maNc/
1
2
2
4
5
6
6
6
9
9
11
12
12
12
15
16
17
18
18
20
21
22
Bethel Orchard/Colby
Broxon St., Nez Perce/Dorian &
Dorian. Abbs/Broxon
Lubkin, Curtis/Mountain View
Roosevelt St., I-84/NY Canal
Latah St., Nez Perce/Overland
Pacific St _ Palouse/Nez Perce
Ruth & Jackie US
10th, Ada/Sherman & Sherman,
10th/9th & 9th, Sherman/Ada
Abbs St., Nez Perce/Donan
Irving St., Orchard/Garden
Targe (3605), Pacific/ Atlantic
Colt St., Cole/Choctaw
Hervey, Palouse/Spaulding
42nd Street Chinden/Adams
4th Street & O'Ferrell (300, 310,
320 around NE corner and 4th to
existing curb 1/3 block to the N
Draft Community Program: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Projects Ranking
for FY 2005 Budget Considerations
Project identNied in FYWP, DCR or Draft Budget.
Project not identified in ACHD planning documents.
City Type of Work
Boise Install median islands for traffic -calming
Boise Install curb. gutter and sidewalk. Match
QQavement to curb.
Boise Rebuild curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Boise Install curb and gutter.
Boise Install curb, gutter and sidewalk on west side
Collector Roadway.
Boise Install curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Boise Rebuild curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Boise Install curb, gutter and sidewalk al one
property on the NW comer.
Boise Replace asphalt sidewalk with concrete
Boise Rebuild curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Boise Rebuild curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Boise Install sidewalk.
Boise
Area of
Oise
Garden
City
Install sidewalk on N. or S. side. curb/gutter
already installed.
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk at 2 properties
(only curb/gutter for remainder of block for
drainagej Rebuild roadway
Install curb. gutter and sidewalk Rebuild
street.
Boise Install curb and gutter.
0
J
.z
0)
0
rd
J
U
0..
1,000
0
o O
r m i
E f .o
. T
w a o
q t
6- U a
523,000 5119,000 8,815
40C $22,004 5284,000
800 $85.000 5561,000
1,500 574,000 5262,000
1,900 5131,000 5364,000
2,640 5606,000 51,213,000
800 5143,000 5943,000
200 521,000 5554,000
70C 521,000 5161,000
500 5100,000 51,051,000
1,30C $287,000 51,166,000
250 $8.000
4.700 5127,000
400 5144,000
1,300 5383,000
400 515,000
5163,000
5143,000
51,903,000
51,556,000
5203,000
0
O
z
2 `m
O
E
u =
o ' 8
Y%r O N
Washing( 0.3
on El
m C
E
4E
L E
CU
100%
1,209 Franklin 0-4 100%
El.
1.329 Whitney 0.5 100%
El.
235
3,495
1,640
Koelsch
El.
Owyhee
El.
Whitney
El.
0.4 94%
0.6 100%
0.5 100%
289 Whitney 0.1 100%
El.
784 Summer 1.2 100%
wind El.
1,629 Longfello 0.1 100%
w El.
517 Whitney 0.4 100%
El.
2,901 Franklin 1.0 91%
855 Whitney 0.7 100%
El.
858 Silver 0.6 100%
Sage El.
302 Whitney 0 4 90%
Et
1,221 Boy's & 0 2 0%
Girl's
822 Longfello 0.6 100%
w El.
Albngbt (W. side), Marvinitalmeld
& Fairfield (S. side),
Holiday/Albright & Holiday Dr., S.
end/Fairfield
Walnut, Park S. Boundary/N
Boundary @ Unpaved Service Rd.
noise install sidewalk.
1,3(x; 5Je.UUU 3141S,UV0 b'G) Mcldmey u.3 1UUS
El.
Boise Replace curb, gutter and sidewalk. Collector 70C $22,000 5169,000 7,928 Adams 0.9 0%
roadway
Boise Install curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Et.
20C $26,000 5675,000 1,226 Ann 0.7 100%
Morrison
Pax
587,000 5920,000 189 Garfield 0.7 100%
El.
5169,000 5811,000 487 Koelsch 0.4 100%''
EI.
Bosse Install curb and gutter on north side, as well at 50c
SW ifR/W allows.
Boise Install sidewalk. 1 tnc
Boise Rebuild road to connect Sloan to Bogart, rural
section
70C 365.000 5492,000 1,260 Shadow 0%
Hills El
Technical Criteria
Safety Cost
N C
6
a
Avg. Daily Traffic
Cost Points
Ext. Drainage Points
J
V 12
zz
VO
wa
1-
10 0 10 10 10 40
4 8 10
4 8 10
0 10 10
8 6 8
4 8 10
2 8 10
2 10 6
4 8 10
2 8 10
6 10 8
2 10 8
2 6 8
2 10 10
4 8 8
2 8 8
8 10 40
6 10 38
8 10 38
8 5 35
2 10 34
4 10 34
6 10 34
10 10 42
2 10 32
2 5 31
10 10 40
10 10 36
0 10 32
0 10 30
10 10 38
4 10
o,
2
10
4 10 10
.10
1
10
5
5
37
25
31
37
Partnership
Criteria
C
a.
r
u.
a_
2
ce
wz
zO_
cea-
< a
10 8 18
10 0 10
0 10
10
10
10
10
10
18
10
10 0 10
10 0 10
10 0 10
10 0 10
10 1 10
10
10
10 i1 10
10 0 10
0 10 110
10 0 10
0
10 - 0
10 6
10
fi 0, ,
0 kP _:.gProgram\Com non ly Pgm PnortlMey Rensionsk2004 Apr CGS Protect Pnonl¢ason May Revisions ds
16
10
Programming Criteria
aw
Agency Support Points
Goog Equity Points
Development Points
t7
z
M 1-
oa
cc
0.
8 0 1 5 14
10 0 1 3 14
10 0 1 5 16
8 0 1 5 14
2 0 1 5 8
10 0 1 5 16
10 0 1 5 16
10 0 1 5 16
0 0 1 5 6
10 0 1 5 16
10 0 1 5 16
0 0 1 5 6
0 0 5 5 10
8 0 1 5 14
2 8 0 5 15
0 0 1 5 6
0 1 5
0 0 1 5
0 0 1 5
2 0 1 5
0 0 1 5
8 0 1 0
6
6
6
8
6
9
<
O Z
a
72
64
64
62
61
60
60
60
58
58
57
56
56
56
55
54
53
50
50
49
47
46
44IACHD
Notes
Points for Leveraging non-ACHD funds dependant on grant
approval from City of Boise. 10 points for R/W factor is
dependent on buy in from property owners who will lose parking
��qI�44p In the installation th
of e traffic islands.
I[W at 100%.
Design and ROW are al 100%.
Additional length due to increasing to the project limits to
o ntain View. Constniclion lentj�tive 2006.
540K From Boise City. Country Club is considering other options
or project, such as only curb/gutter.
Design 99%, R/W to be completed end of April 2004.
onstruction tentative 2006.
Design and RIW complete.
Only affected parcel is the Elementary School and the Principal
as signed off on the project so I assumed that we have 100%
oval_
Design and ROW are complete.
Design complete. RIW complete by end of FY04.
Estimates calculated for south side, which reduces the number of
ffected parcels.
besign complete.
2 Overall request of Garden City. Urban Renewal District has
ledged 50% of cost up to 5250K. Also includes road trust of
53,100.
Y
C
lC
tl'
23
6/1/2004 15:05
Project Information
Project Name
Hazel St , 28`"/150' e/o 27'
City
Draft Community Program: Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Projects Ranking
for FY 2005 Budget Considerations
Project Identified in FYWP, OCR or Draft Budget.
Project not identified in ACHD planning documents.
Type of Work
Boise Install curb, gutter and sidewalk on south side
v
w
/6,000
a
0
U
$886,000
2
▪ o E2
0
8s
o « 8
W . L
Q N G N
443 Cowell Et 0.2
N Avg. Daily Traffic Points
Technical Criteria
Safety Cost
2
A
0
0.
.
.a
o.. 52
VZ. c
n _E ao
0
a 0
8 10 4
cn Ext. Drainage Pants
29
Partnership
Criteria
10 0
Programming Criteria
10
0
a Agency Support Points
—Geog. Equity
N Developm
re
a
6
45
Notes
23
Preece Dr. (N. Side),
Cote/Ethndge
Boise
FIII in sidewalk gaps.
1,500
$440,000
51,550,000
2,677
Cole EL
0.8
100%
6
y
10
8
0
5
29
10
0
10
0
0
1
5
6
45
25
Atlantic, Nez Perce/Overland
Boise
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Tod
$132.000
5995.000
425
Whiney
EL
0.4
100%
2
8
10
4
5
29
10
0
10
0
0
1
3
4
43 Only 7 affected parcels on the School side (East) . Section from
school to Overland has existing sidewalk.
26
Phillippi, Targee/Malad
Boise
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk. (Both sides)
1,250
S249,000
51,053,000
645
Hillcrest
Er
0.8
55%
2
10
8
2
10
320
0
0
6
0
1
3
10
13
42 Project identified in 05-09 FYWP Design delayed from 2004 I,
2005. Construction tentative 2006
0.3
0%
4
10
10
0
5
29
0
26
Ave D, 2nd St to 3rd St & 2nd St,
Ave. D to Ave. C
Kuna
New roadway connecting Avenue D with 2nd
Street
330
$302,000
53,189,000
New Road
Ross
Elem.
0
0
8
0
0
5
Cost estimated were obtained from the 05-09 FYWP folder for
42 this project.
28
Virginia Ave.. a/o Victory, w/o
Federal Way
Boise
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk.
351
357,000
8858,000
254
Hawthorn
eEL
1.2
100%2
10
6
4
5
27
10
0
10
0 ^
0
1
3
4
41
28
Wildwood, Ustick/Montana
Boise
Install dab, gutter and sidewalk.
`t 1
5276,000
51,618,000
1,907
Frontier
El.
1.0
100%
4
10
8
0
5
27
10
0
10
0
0
1
3
4
Extensive Irrigation impacts, RIW issues, bridge widening.
41
30
Coston Street (E. side), Warm
Springs/State & Jefferson (both
sides), Coston/Jantoni
Boise
Install curb and gutter for drainage problems
1,450
5190,000
8693,000
1,039
Roosevel
t El.
0.6
100%
4
8
8
6
0
26
10
0
10
0
0
1
3
4
'400' on Jefferson, 1050' on Coston SL
40
_
30
Waltman, Larkspur/Linder
Meridian
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk, widen aspha
on south side.
1,401
5270,000
51,019,000
1,124
Peregrin
e EI.
0.1
83%
4
8
10
2
` 0
_
24
6
0
6
0
0
5
5
10
40 Sidewalk exists on north side (school).
32
Plymouth St., Phillippi/DW @ 532
& Phillippi, DW @ 1920/Plymouth
Boise
Construct curb/gutter on south side (Plymouth
, pave shoulder on east side (Phillip') and
construct drainage improvements.
3
533,000
5493,000
1,168
Hillcrest
EI.
0.7
50%
4
8
8
8
5
33
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
6
150' on Plymouth & 200' on Phillippi. In -House Design
39
32
2nd St., Alley/Amanita
Eagle
Install 10' sidewalk
354
599,000
51,500,000
1,039
Eagle EI.
0.3
50%
4
10
10
2
5
31
0
0
0
0
0
3
5
8
39 requirestiremoval of large trees, possible asphalt widening in lieu
34
32od St. (E. side), Grace/Dewey
Boise
Install curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
309
• 1
585,000
593,000
51,146000
8822,000
1,832
1,408
Lowell El.
Liberty
El.
0.5
0.7
0%
0%
4
4
8
8
10
8
2
4
5
5
29
29
0
1 0
0
0
0 1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
5
5
6
6
5
Only 8 parcels impacted for project just on the E. side of the road
35
35
34
Wright St., Apple/Constitution
Bose
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk on north side.
34
Owyhee Ave., Cedar/Bridge & N
School Ave., Avalon/Owyhee
Kuna
Install curb, gutter and sidewalks, as well as
traffic calming (not specific).
1 1 1
$896,000
51,577,000
427
Indian
Creek El
0.3
96%
2
8
10
0
0
20
10
0
10
0
0
0
5
Preliminary work needs to be done to assess drainage.
35
37
Maple Avenue, 4th/Ross Elem.
Kuna
Rebuild for curb, gutter and sidewalk.
10.
815,000
8768,000
230
Ross EI.
0.2
0%
0
10
10
4
5
29
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
East side only. Partner w/ LoWst St. prof.
34
38
Ash St., Canal/Avalon
Kuna
Install sidewalk on east side, handrail at canal
and speed bumps.
391,000
51,072,000
895
Indian
Creek El.
1.1
100%
2
8
6
2
0
18
10
0
10
0
0
0
5
5
33
39
Locust St, 4th/Dawn Court
Kuria
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk.
1,i,r 1
5254,000
$1,342,000
261
Ross EJ.
0.6
0%
2
8
8
2
5
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
30
39
Columbus, Overland/Kootenai
Boise
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk.Collector
Street
1,301
5413,000
51,677,000
3,191
Hawthorn
a El.
1.0
59%
8
8
8
0
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
6
30 Numerous rental properties have not signed RNV intent.
41
Parkhill Drive, Peregrine/Highland
View
Boise
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk on south side
1,200
5423;000
51,863,000
583
Highland
e Et
0.9
10%
2
10
8
0
5
25
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
4
29
41
52nd St., Allworth/End
Garden
city
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk.
1,2 i
5284,000
51,251,000
382
Boy's &
Girl's
Gvb
1.6
4%
2
a
10
0
2
_
10
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
29
41
Settlers Ave., Ash Park Ln/Cole
Rd
Boise
Install sidewalk.
2,00,
5475,000
81,255,000
720
Valley
View El.
1.1
0%
2
8
6
2
5
23
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
6
29
44
Montclair Dr. (1941)
Bosse
Build a cul -0e -sac.
14 4
5238,000
512,553,000
65
Longfello
I.
1,5
93%
0
10
6
0
0
16
10
0
10
0
0
1
0
1
27 L1key to be completed through development process_
45
36th, Clay/Boise River
Garden
City
Install curb, gutter and sidewalk.
921
5222,000
51,273,000
1.124
Boy's&
1.3
0%
4
8
2
2
5
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
26 Awaiting resolution on realignment of Adams St.
46
Chelan Ave. @N. Zoe Ln.
Garden
Widen roadway for turnaround
101
863,000
83,303,000
90
Andrus
3.3
0%
0
10
0
0
5
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
18 iMac needs additional support because of significant RAN
ACHD planning documents include the Five -Year Work Program (FYWP) and Design and Construction Review (DCR).
D iRan&ProgramtCommunily Pgm PriontMay Revisronsl2004 Apr CGS Profecl Pnonl¢aeon May Rens,ons xis