Minutes - 2004 - City Council - 08/30/2004 - Regular
v'
ORIGINAL
EAGLE CITY COUNCIL
Minutes
August 30, 2004
1.
2.
CALL TO ORDER: Called to order at 6:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: BASTIAN, NORDSTROM, SEDLACEK. Absent:
GUERBER. A quorum is present.
CONSENT AGENDA:
. Consent Agenda items are considered to be routine and are acted on with one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless the Mayor,
a Councilmember, member of City Staff, or a citizen requests an item to be
removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items removed from the
Consent Agenda will be placed on the Regular Agenda in a sequence
determined by the Rules of Order.
. Any item on the Consent Agenda which contains written Conditions of
Approval from the City of Eagle City Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission,
or Design Review Board shall be adopted as part of the City Council's
Consent Agenda approval motion unless specifically stated otherwise.
A. Appointment to the Desien Review Board: The Mayor is requesting
Council confirmation of Debbie Barnes to the Design Review Board for a
three year term. (NM)
B. DR-89-04 - Conceptual Master Plan for Hill Road Park includine the
construction of Phase I - City of Eaele: City of Eagle, represented by
James Murray with CSHQA Architects, is requesting design review
approval for the conceptual master plan for Hill Road Park including the
construction of Phase I. The site is located on the north side of Hill Road
approximately 260-feet east of Dicky Drive. (WEV)
Bastian moves to approve the consent agenda. Seconded by Sedlacek.
ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. CP A-O2-04 City of Eaele: The City of Eagle will consider a City initiated
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to modify a portion of the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map and a policy to adopt the Western Eagle Sub-area Plan.
3.
Mayor introduces the item.
City Staff, Nichoel Baird-Spencer, presents the staff report.
Mayor opens the public hearing. The public hearing portion will be opened and
testimony taken Chapter by Chapter.
Chapter 1 No one chooses to speak.
Page I ofJ4
K: ICO UN CIL IMINUTES\2004ICC -08- 3 O-04spmin. doc
Chapter 2: City Staff, Baird-Spencer, reviews the staff report for this section.
Mark Butler, 52 N. Second St. Eagle, Idaho. Butler has submitted a letter, which is in
Council's packet requesting text addition to regarding power facilities. A copy a/letter is
attached to minutes. The amendment is to page 9 Section 2.5 q. regarding above ground
transmission lines.
Chapter 3: City Staff, Baird-Spencer, reviews the staff report for this section.
Mark Butler, 52 N. Second ST. Eagle, Idaho. Butler notes that there is a letter in the
packet for Council's review. He briefly reviews the text changes he is requesting to page
12 of 56 section 3.9 f.
Chapter 4: City Staff, Baird-Spencer, reviews the staff report for this section.
MeMi Plum 854 E. River Drive Eagle, Idaho. Requests hard copies of the maps that are
being displayed on the overhead.
Mayor directs staff to provide copies.
Ken Rice, Holladay Engineering addresses the infrastructure for the water and sewer plan
for the proposed area.
Vicki Priddy 5926 Floating Feather Eagle, Idaho. Priddy inquires if this is only
addressing wells and ground water, not surface water.
Mayor states that she is correct.
City Engineer, Rice continues with his explanation.
Sedlacek states that the intent of a recently passed municipal ordinance is if a piece of
possibly agricultural ground were to be developed into a residential or commercial
development the City is requiring that the surface water rights be used for non-potable
uses, landscaping and things like that. And that wells be accumulated into the City water
system to be part of the domestic water supply.
Vicki Priddy has concerns with a recently passed municipal water ordinance and its
legality. Does not feel the ordinance is legal as the water right cannot be transferred out
of the canal. Priddy states that while the ordinance states that the City wishes to safe
guard and preserve the public water supply, water rights supply out of irrigation canals
are not public, but are private and belong to the irrigation canal. Share holders own water
pertinent to their property out of the irrigation canal, but the water right belongs to the
canal. Thus the water rights cannot be transferred to the city. Priddy states that you
cannot transfer a water right out of a canal.
Page 2 or 14
K: ICO UN CIL IMINUTES\2004ICC-O 8- 3 0-04spmin. doc
Discussion. Council states that this perhaps this is issue of word choice, and one that
could be addressed at another meeting. It is noted that there were public hearings held for
the water ordinance prior to its passage, at which this could have been addressed,
nonetheless it is something that the Council will direct their attorney to look into the
matter.
City Engineer, Rice provides comment on the sewer infrastructure.
Mike Seiler 1125 Steeple View Dr. Eagle, Idaho. Has questions about ground water
recharge process and what will it be surface percolation or direct injection.
Rice states that the ground water recharge programs they are looking at right now it
would be surface spreading, not injection wells.
Mark Butler, 52 N. Second St. Eagle, Idaho. Butler notes that there is a letter in the
packet for Council's review. He briefly reviews the text changes he is requesting to page
22 of 56 Section 4.10.1 which would encourage power facilities to be encouraged to be
located outside of the Central Business District. A copy of letter is attached to minutes.
Chapter 5: City Staff, Baird-Spencer, reviews the staff report for this section.
Larry Sale, Staff Liaison between ACHD and the City of Eagle, with Ada County
Highway District. Sale reads letter into the record. Copy of letter to attach to minutes.
Mike Seiler, 1125 Steeple View Dr. Eagle, Idaho. Feels that there are numerous ACHD
projects that are currently unfinished, specifically Hill Road, and Chinden Boulevard.
Does not feel that the standards for ACHD and the standards for private developers is not
the same. Would like to know how to fix this problem.
Sale addresses Mr. Seiler's questions. Comments on funding of projects, jurisdictional
responsibility and completion timelines.
Mark Butler, 52 N. Second St. Eagle, Idaho. Butler notes that there is a letter in the
packet for Council's review. He briefly reviews the text changes he is requesting to 28 of
56. Would like to see the graphic change to a 3 lane road rather than the 5 lane that is
represented.
John Petrovsky, representing North Ada County Foothills Association, a group of
landownerslhomeowners generally north of Beacon Light Road centered on Eagle Road
up Willow Creek. Mr. Petroski comments on the Village Planning Area, disappointed
that the plan presented tonight abandons the rings of lower density as it projects out
towards the foothills. Feels that traffic will be forced onto Beacon Light Road and
Floating Feather and that this plan does not address this traffic shift. This organization is
concerned with development north of the foothills. Feels that alternative access needs to
be provide to get north into the foothills, by one of the north-south arterials is necessary.
Page 3 of 14
K: ICO UN CIL IMI NUTES\2004ICC-O8- 3 O-Q4spmin. doc
Mayor calls a 5 minute break.
GUERBER is teleconferenced in at 8:05 p.m.
Chapter 6: City Staff, Baird-Spencer, reviews the staff report for general land use
section. The Mayor clarifies the procedure that will be taken tonight for public testimony
and explains the color-coding of each proposed planning area.
Colleen Maile, 885 Rush Road Eagle, Idaho. Would like to encourage the Council to use
common sense and courage while reviewing and acting on these proposals tonight. Smart
Growth is a concept that had been embraced in the past and she is disheartened with the
proposals before the Council tonight. Ms. Maile feels that we can still maintain low
densities while accommodating commercial growth.. Does not want higher density.
Mary Taylor, 3410 Hartley Eagle, Idaho. Has attended the Vision meetings, Planning and
Zoning meetings, and various other meetings held regarding the proposals. States that a
number of people had said they do not want to be included into Eagle's area of impact.
She says she represents a number of people between Linder and Highway 16 and they do
not want to be included into Eagle's area of impact. Also states that for the record it is
Eagle causing the conflict with the City of Star, not the City of Star.
Roy Barrett, 918 Eagle Hills Way Eagle, Idaho. Owns the property on the east portion of
the intersection of Highway 44 and Highway 16. Has attended numerous meetings and
agrees with the previous speaker. Does not want his property to be included into Eagle's
Area of Impact nor into its City limits. Feels that the City of Star is more than capable to
take care of that area.
Caralee Walker 301 W. Meadow Ridge Eagle, Idaho. Is testifying on the Eagle Middle
School Planning area. Has concerns with the proposed density. States that the
classrooms are overcrowded and the quality of their education is being affected. Would
like the zoning to stay one lot per 2 acres, so they can continue to enjoy the more rural
setting.
Marie Alder 651 W. Rush Court Eagle, Idaho. Addressing Eagle Middle School Planning
area, specifically the Chase property. Would like to maintain the rural environment. Is
against the proposed density. The schools are overcrowded and an increase in density
would cause
Rim View Planning Area: from Meridian Road along the Rim taking into account Spur
Wing Golf Course. City Staff, Baird-Spencer, reviews the staff report for this section.
Judy Erdman7283 Windward Drive Meridian, Idaho. Has lived here for 30 years. Is very
concerned with increased density. Would like large lots.
Page4ofl4
K: ICO UNCIL IMINUTES\2004 ICC-O8- 3 0-04spmin. doc
Verl Roberts 2982 Sugar Plum Eagle, Idaho. Is happy with current zoning, and does not
want higher density.
Dave Vail, 7448 E. Windward Drive states that there are 200 acres in contention tonight.
Draws Council's attention to the letter he has submitted to Council, which is in their
packet tonight. Agrees with the previous testimony give tonight regarding the proposal
being zoned too densly. Feels that 2 acre parcels is too high density. Reads a section of
findings of fact from 2 ~ years ago. Check tape to see if he states what appl he is
reading from.
Mime Plum 854 River Heights Drive. Has concerns with increased density. Feels that
north of Chinden is a good place to retain 5 acres zoning. Would like to maintain the
lifestyle they have come to cherish.
Pat McGarran, 795 River Heights Drive. Feels that the increased density and traffic
would not be desirable. Has concerns with the capacity of Eagle Sewer District to
accommodate higher density. Feels this planning area should remain rural. Does not feel
that the high nitrate level in their water levels caused by septic systems should push the
need for extending sewer lines, which may result in the allowance of higher density
development.
Sedlacek provides background information on the role of the Sewer District and the
possible extension of serves in this area.
Paul Caberly, 913 River Heights Drive Meridian, Idaho. Agrees to a number of the
comments previously given. Notes that Ms. McGarran is a professor of Water Quality
issues and would like to make that part of the record.. Feels that 2 ~ years ago the
Council took appropriate action and is alarmed that they would consider higher density
now.
Janice Leighton 620 Clear Vue Drive Eagle, Idaho. States that from Eagle Road all the
way to Spur Wing there is nothing less than one acre, and believes it should stay that way.
Would actually like to see the rest of it go 5, but definitely not less than one.
Dick Sheehan 60 E. Clear Creek Drive Eagle, Idaho. State that a great deal of what he
feels had already been said tonight. Against increased density, as it would have a
negative impact on traffic. Encourages Council to not allow things that are incompatible
with what is currently there.
Rhonda McGrath, 10 II River Heights. Ms. McGrath agrees with the testimony given
tonight. Hopes that Council will strongly weigh what the residents are testifying to
tonight, more so than what is being proposed by developers testifying before them
tonight.
Page S of 14
K: ICO UN CIL \MJ NUTES\2004 ICC- 08- 3 O-04spmin. doc
Mike McGrath 10 II River Heights, would like the lower density to remain. Would like
to maintain his current quality of life. If the density is increased it would very negatively
impact traffic in this area.
Bob Stowe, 6722 N. Windward Dr. Increased density would negatively impact the
quality of life of those currently residing in this area. Does not feel it is compatible
zoning. Feels that the zoning is being driven by developers and not taking into account
what the current residents want.
Mayor provides procedural clarification for the public hearing items tonight.
Ron Sali 1270 Candle Ridge Court. Has developed both high density and lower density
projects. Agrees with the testimony tonight and feels that Eagle has made itself very
special with its low density.
Mike Sieler, 1125 Steeple View Drive. Notes that a former Mayor is currently on the
Ada County Commission and is a great advocate for Eagle. Encourages everyone to re-
elect Rick Yzaguirre to help ensure Eagle's interests are preserved.
Mark Butler, comments on existing language in the Comprehensive plan which calls for
buffering in this area.
City Staff, Baird-Spencer, comments on how the proposed land use designation was
arrived at for the Rim View area. Notes that the County already had applications in this
area that would cause this increased density, so taking that into account the staff
attempted to incorporate it into this proposed land use.
Cell service is lost for Council member Guerber at 9: 1 0 p.m.
Discussion amongst the Council. Sedlacek feels that a minimum of 1 acre lots should be
maintained to insure compatibility. Bastian also feels that lower density should be
maintained, except the "going home" corner which may accommodate a convenience
store type activity so people wouldn't have to go all the way into Meridian or Eagle for
minor purchases. Perhaps some buffering for this type of commercial use would be
needed. Nordstrom concurs with comments made by Sedlacek and Bastian. Notes that
with Meridian across the way and their zoning policies, it will still be a challenge.
Discussion. Bastian would like to see a minimum of 1 acre lot size with buffering as it
transitions up to 5 acre lots.
City Attorney, Susan Wildwood, notes that the Council may choose close public
testimony on this one item, and make a motion on this section only. Mayor explains that
the Council has the opportunity action on one planning area at a time. Mayor asks if there
is any additional testimony from anyone in the audience.
Page6ofl4
K: ICO UN CIL \MINUTES\2004ICC -08- 3 O-04spmin. doc
Claudette (last name unintelligible) 1100 River Heights Drive. Likes the buffer idea
between 1 acre up to 5 acre lots.
Mayor closes this section of the public hearing.
Sedlacek moves to have the Rim Area be considered a rural transitional area, with
feathering to occur with the lower density abutting existing property and that the
overall density not exceed one unit per acre. Seconded by Bastian. Discussion.
Sedlacek amends her motion to provide clarification that that there is transition to
the larger lots around the existing properties with the understanding that there will
be the higher density, including the townhouses near Spur Wing that were proposed
and then the commercial on the corner with that 5 acres. Development must be
applied for with a Planned Unit Development or development agreement. This
includes the commercial area and townhouse area as proposed. Second concurs
with amendment. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
Central Business District: City Staff, Baird-Spencer, reviews the staff report for this
section.
Rosalie Houghs 3884 Leland Way Boise, Idaho has concerns with the proposed zoning of
her property located at 263 N. Eagle Road. She is not clear why the residential property
would be included in this. She is inclined to request that it not be included in the CBD.
Jan Shurtie, 1522 W. 15th Meridian, Idaho represents her mother who lives at 240 N.
Eagle Road and her brother residing at 262 N. Eagle Road and Merle Brown who lives
one house north of her brother. Everyone is opposed to this amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to a Central Business District. They all want to remain in this area
forever, and feels that this change would allow commercial to be right next to them.
Would increase noise and traffic. They do not foresee ever moving and changing the
residential use.
Mark Butler, notes that the proposed language for the Comprehensive Plan to extend the
Central Business District would not change the current zoning of the property. Discusses
current options he has for properties in this area and his plans for future development.
Also notes that any land use would have to be come before Council for the individual
applications. Has met with the City Forester on these sites.
City Attorney, Susan Wildwood, comments on a letter submitted to the Council by the
Carpenters. Letter attached to minutes. Wildwood provides clarification on the
amendment process.
City Staff provides clarification on which property owners on the west side of Eagle Road
that have requested inclusion. States that the Planning and Zoning Commission was
concerned with spot zoning and thus the four lots were all included rather than just the
one.
Page 7 of14
K: ICO UN CIL \MINUTES\2004ICC-O8- 3 O-04spmin. doc
Rosalie Hughes has a question regarding the map she received. Baird-Spencer notes that
the map only reflects properties which are being impacted.
Colleen Maile, states that her son lives on Olde Park. Does not want the character of
aide Park compromised when development does come through.
Mayor closes the public testimony on the Central Business District Planning Area.
Discussion amongst the Council. Sedlacek would like to remove all of the properties
proposed on the east side of Eagle Road. At a minimum remove the Carpenter and
Brown properties withdrawn for this application. Discussion.
Mrs. Hughes states that she didn't realize the properties south of hers is already Central
Business District. She doesn't have a problem with being included in Central Business
District as the existing zoning will remain until a zoning change is applied for.
Nordstrom reads the definition of Central Business District as stated in the
Comprehensive Plan for the public's information. Discussion. Bastian notes that he is
viewing this amendment as future planning, and that it may not occur within the next few
years, but looking down the road it is good planning practice.
Mayor asks for additional testimony from the public.
Susie Kerr, owns 11 acres north of Floating Feather. States that this zoning designation
will compound traffic problems.
Mark Butler notes that Mr. Dawson who is on the east side of Eagle Road. Does want to
be included in Central Business District.
Mayor closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Council. Nordstrom feels that this is good planning and does not
feel that it would be detrimental to residents. Bastian states that he would be in favor of
removing the 4 lots south of Mission Drive from the Central Business District
deignation. And let the lots on the west side remain as proposed. Sedlacek agrees with
Bastian's comments.
Sedlacek moves to approve the Central Business District for the proposed lots on the west
side of Eagle Road and for the first parcel north of Idaho Street and north of the existing
CBD on the east side of Eagle Road (that staff has outlined that the property owner desires
the change). The 4 lots south of Mission Drive on the easet side of Eagle Road shall be
excluded from the Central Business District designation. Seconded by Bastian. ALL
A YE..MOTION CARRIES.
Page 8 of 14
K: IC 0 UN CIL \MINUTE S\2004 ICC-08- 3 0-04spmin. doc
Eagle Middle School Planning Area & Floating Feather Residential Area: City Staff,
Baird-Spencer, reviews the staJfreport for these sections.
Betty Miller, 959 Preakness Dr. Eagle, Idaho. Their property backs up to the Calhoughn
property. Would like it to be compatible with their property and questions how it would
be done.
Baird-Spencer explains the densification of the area and how it is computed.
Miller would like the density to remain the same, and require the developer to have to
submit applications so they could have a say in the process. Is opposed to the proposed
changes.
Discussion for clarification between Staff and Council.
Pat Miller 959 Preakness Dr. Eagle, Idaho. Likes the low density and would like them to
remaIn.
Colleen Maile, 85 Rush Road Eagle, Idaho. Is concerned with the density around the
middle school. Felt that the 2 acres zoning was a hard felt battle and should remain.
States that she feels that many people didn't know this area was up for revision.
Mike Seiler 1125 Steeple View Dr. Eagle, Idaho. Concerned with economics and
density. Is concerned with density creep. Does not feel this is developer driven, but by a
landowner who wants to get more out of it. The Council must decide what is important
to the Community. One to two units per acre would be acceptable.
Paul Sadlak 171 W. Lance Ln. Eagle, Idaho. Feels that there was not enough public
notice of the meeting. Does not want higher density.
Brian Kerr 252 W. Meadow Ridge Eagle, Idaho. Does not want higher density.
Questions why the Comprehensive Plan continually comes up for review.
Mayor states that legally, property owners can always request change to the Plan. City
Attorney, Wildwood notes that Idaho State Law requires that the plan shall be reviewed at
least every 5 years. Baird-Spencer, City Staff provides clarification regarding density
near the school.
John Beewick 2102 N. Canter Place Eagle, Idaho. His property abuts the Chase property.
Does not feel this is an issue of density, but an issue of consistency. Felt that adjoining
properties should be zoned and developed similarly to those currently existing. Expresses
concern with traffic increases. Against the increase of density.
Dan Laboe 615 W. Rush Ct. Eagle, Idaho. Echo's the concerns with the density
testimony already given tonight. Has concerns with traffic, does not want to alter the
current plan. Does not believe the school district would request higher density.
Page 9 of 14
K: ICO UNCIL IMINUTES\2004ICC-O8- 3 O-04spmin. doc
Steve Jonan 633 W. Rush Court Eagle, Idaho. Concurs with testimony previously given.
Traffic is a major concern.
John Petrosky 4831 Willow Creek Road. Representing the North Ada County Foothills
Association. Agrees with the testimony give tonight. Feels that the Council is
abandoning what has made the Comprehensive plan so good and Eagle such a great
community.
Mark Butler, 52 N. Second Street Eagle, Idaho. Representing Jim Merkle and Don Hutts,
potential developers of the Calhoun property. Does not have a problem with requiring a
PUD on the some of these properties. Feels that the Council should consider a way to
increase density in properties located in a close proximity to downtown.
Susie Kerr has traffic concerns, especially around the Middle Schools. Does not feel that
higher density should be allowed until the traffic issues are addressed.
Mike Chase, recognizes that neighboring property has been developed and that it is part
of progress. He is not in favor of high density, but notes that his property will be subject
to what his current neighbors have done. The Chase Family has owned the property for
75 years, and now their future land use is potentially being dictated by how neighboring
properties have been allowed to be developed. The family farm is what has give Eagle
it's rural atmosphere and for most families the land serves as their 40lK plan. PUD's
have worked well for the Council in the past and hope they would consider that in the
future.
Jim Merkel 2150 N. Canter Place Eagle, Idaho. Does not feel common planning sense
was used with this plan.
Mayor closes the public hearing.
Discussion amongst the Council. Bastian notes that the Meridian School District would
like to see higher density near their facilities so that the children could walk to school.
Comments on water and sewer facilities. Would like this to be a transitional area.
Around the school, near Floating Feather and across from Downing Downs, requiring I
house per acre transitioning to lower densities on the fringes. Nordstrom agrees with
Bastian's comments. Sedlacek agrees that an overall density of one unit per acre with
compatible lot sizes around the outside perimeter.
Sedlacek moves to residential transition area with the overall density not to exceed 1
unit per acre with transitional lots around the perimeter abutting up to the larger
lots. A Planned Unit Development and/or development agreement would be
required. In regard to the commercial on the corner, remove any commercial or
mixed use from the corner, the northwest corner of Eagle Road for the time being.
Seconded by Nordstrom. Discussion. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
Park Lane Planning Area: City Staff, Baird-Spencer, reviews the staff report for this
section.
Page IOofl4
K: \CO UNCIL IMINUTE 5\2004ICC-08- 3 0-04spmm. doc
Steven Ricks, owns the property which has the proposed as professional office park.
Owns 37 acre parcel, which is split by a drain ditch. Would rather have it zoned
commercial and a greater vision for proposed zoning be utilized. By zoning little pockets
of commercial fewer trips may be generated into the Central Business District. Mr. Ricks
would like to see the south 17 acres between the canal and Highway 44 be zoned
commercial and north 20 acres remain professional park.
Pete Cinterino, states that he owns property across from Camille Beckman. Would like
his property to be zoned commercial, a small pocket of commercial. Something that
would be compatible with the Beckman property. Is pleased with the visioning process,
and would like to see his 2 or 2 Y4 acres zoned commercially.
Kathy Nahas, supports Mr. Cinterino's request. Feels that commercial would be
appropriate in that location.
Tim Fease 4479 Old Valley Road Eagle, Idaho. Is in favor of additional commercial in
this area as proposed by Mr. Ricks and Mr. Cinterino.
Mark Butler, 52 N. Second Street Eagle, Idaho. Butler notes that there is a letter in the
packet for Council's review. Has proposed changes to the language. Page 36 of 56
Section 6.5C.2 Design 6th paragraph, and 6.5C.3 Access first paragraph.
Foad Roghani, 175 Rosebud Lane. Feels that an application later on the agenda for the
music academy would be a great addition to the Eagle Community. But as for the request
by Mr. Cinterino to allow zoning for a convenience store, fast food place he is concerned.
It would be a great challenge for these type of uses to meet the design bar which has been
set by the Camille Beckman project.
Bill Stephan 45 Firwood Dr. Eagle, Idaho. Is in strong support for the Ribbonndale
project which is a later application tonight. The music school would increase the quality
of life, and give the communities youth a positive creative outlet.
City Attorney, Wildwood cautions Council not to take testimony on applications which
are to be heard later in the agenda, lest the record be unclear.
Matt Siron 3391 Flint Drive Eagle, Idaho. Addresses the corner of Park and State Street,
traffic is a huge issue. States that Shady Acres already exists and the kids utilize it.
Prefers a mixed use designation.
Mayor closes the public hearing on the Park Lane Planning Area.
Baird-Spencer provides clarification of definitions and land use percentages for Council's
information and consideration.
Discussion amongst Council.
Pa8e 11 of 14
K: IC 0 UN C lL IMI NU TES \2 004 IC C - 0 8 - 3 0- 04s p min. doc
Sedlacek moves to that all the areas shown in purple as mixed use shall remain
mixed use, the 37 acres on the north west corner, the bottom 17 be mixed use and
the top 20 remain residential as an R-3 zone. Seconded by Bastian. Discussion.
ALL A YE...MOTION CARRIES.
Mayor calls a 5 minute break.
Bastian moves to item 4D to the current topic of discussion, and all the remaining
proposed planning areas items in regard to item CP A-02-04, and agenda items 48,
4C and 5A will be continued to the September 7th meeting at 6:30 p.m. Seconded by
Sedlacek. ALL AYE...MOTION CARRIES.
B. CP A-I-03/RZ- 7-03 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Residential Four to
Central Business District and Rezone from R-4 to CBD-DA - G. Greeorv Hall: G.
Gregory Hall, represented by Land Consultants, Inc., is requesting a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to change the land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map from Residential Four (up to four dwelling units per acre) to Central Business
District, and a rezone from R-4 (Residential - up to four dwelling units per acre) to CBD-
DA (Central Business District with Development Agreement). The site is located on the
west side of North Eagle Road, approximately 800-feet north of West State Street, at 223
North Eagle Road.
This item is continued to September 7, 2004 at 6:30 p.m.
C. CP A-2-03 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Residential One to
Commercial- Rick & Nita Musick: Rick & Nita Musick, represented by Land
Consultants, Inc., is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use
designation on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from Residential One (up to one
dwelling unit per acre) to Commercial. The site is located on the south side of West State
Street approximately 400-feet east of Under Road, at 4526 West Old Valley Road. D.
This item is continued to September 7, 2004 at 6:30 p.m.
D. CPA-3-03/RZ-8-03 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Residential One to
Commercial and Mixed Use and Rezone from A-R to C-2-DA and MU-DA- Park
Hampton. LLC.: Park Hampton, LLC, represented by Land Consultants, Inc., is
requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from Residential One (up to one dwelling unit per
acre) to Commercial and Mixed Use, and a rezone from A-R (Agricultural-Residential-up
to one dwelling unit per five acres) to C-2-DA (General Business District with
Development Agreement) and MU-DA (Mixed Use with Development Agreement). The
site (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, & Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, & 9, Block 2, of Flint Estates
Subdivision) is located on the northeast corner of Park Lane and West State Street, at
3950, 3450 & 3300 West State Street, 3415, 3855, and 3850 West Flint Drive, and 312
North Park Lane.
Page 12 of14
K: ICO UNCI L IMINUTES \2004 ICC-O8- 30-04spmin. doc
Mayor introduces the item.
Mark Butler, 52 N. Second Street Eagle, Idaho representing Park Hampton LLC. Butler
reviews the application.
City Staff, Bill Vaughan, reviews the staff report.
Mayor would like to take testimony tonight and continue the discussion of the
development agreement and action to September 7th meeting.
Mayor opens the public hearing.
Jenessa Jarvis 1705Washam Rd. is in favor of the proposed site for the Ribbondale
Academy. Likes the location in proximity to the High School and North Star Charter
School. Not only would it benefit the students, it would also provide jobs.
Rebecca Nielson 3300 State Street Eagle, Idaho. States that there will be a number of
classes offered to people of all ages, children to senior citizens.
Justin Nielson 3300 State Street Eagle, Idaho. Feels that Eagle without this music
academy would be a mistake. Appreciates the opportunity that Mr. Wood has provided to
the music academy.
Nate Scribeth 989 Boise, Idaho. Mr. Scribeth is a teacher. The school will provide great
opportunity for the children and teachers. Rivendale will enrich people's lives.
Don Graybill. This school will provide cultural events. It will provide family friendly
transportation dropping kids off for different activities at the same location. Provides a
positive atmosphere for children.
Ken Cenell1601 Floating Feather Road Eagle, Idaho. Would provide economic
alternatives that may not otherwise be available.
Foad Roghani 175 N. Rosebud Lane Eagle, Idaho. Is impressed with Mr. Wood's
proposal. The proximity to the school is a good location, the jazz academy would be an
excellent addition to the community. Would like to see the project approved.
Ken Cenell, a great deal of the land being used for the school is being donated which is
making the academy possible.
John Wood discusses the meetings and process he has gone through to get to this point.
Comments on transportation alternatives, the entrance to Eagle Island State Park, and
residential uses.
Matt Siron 3391 Flint Drive Eagle, Idaho. Supports the lots bordering Flint Drive to
remain residential. Support the lots abutting State Street to be mixed use with a berming
Pagel30fl4
K: ICO UNCIL IMINUTES \2004ICC-O8- 3 0-04spmin. doc
with a fence to provide buffering. Does not want duplexes or multi-family units along
Flint Drive. The density along Flint Drive should not be more than. . . see tape.
Bastian questions how parking would be accommodated. Butler provides clarification.
No garages on the front of the homes, they would be on the back.
Mayor continues the public hearing to the September 7th meeting and will be heard first
on public hearings.
4.
NEW BUSINESS:
A. Resolution 04-15: A Resolution Of The Eagle City Council, Eagle, Ada County,
Idaho Repealing Any And All Existing Comprehensive Plans, And Adopting The
Amended 2000 Comprehensive Plan; Affirming That Prescribed Notice And Hearing
Requirements Were Met In Accordance With Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code; And
Providing An Effective Date.
This item is continued to September 7, 2004 at 6:30 p.m.
5.
ADJOURNMENT:
Sedlacek moves to adjourn at 1:00 a.m. Seconded by Nordstrom. ALL AYE:
MOTION CARRIES...
Hearing no further business, the Council meeting adjourned at 1 :00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
~(~k ~
SHAItON K. BERGMANN
CITY CLERK/TREASURER
APPROVED:
r
""""""""
,.." OF E A",#.
..." ...:I '"'"0 #.
, <\ ~ ..."..... ~ ~#,,-
" /.~ .. -- ~ ~
"-I.. ~yOR-'1¡.-. "
:: : /"~ ~ .. \
:: :OJ '.:
: * - _.- . .
: \ AL;::: i
" -~ S E ~:::
"-.(>0 ~<) -- 0 ::
~iP'>..--/!ÞOR"~... ~$
###.~:.¡ ...,...'" ~ .."
"" "l'E 0 F \ v".."
""""11 ...,."
Pa8el4ofl4
K: ICO UN CIL IMINUTES\2004ICC-08- 30-04.pmin. doc
59cc 8/3010#
Land Consultants, Inc
52 N. 2nd Street • Eagle, Idaho 83616 • Office 208-938-3812 • Fax 208-938-5873
August 26, 2004
Dear Mayor Merrill and Council Members:
Please consider the following text and map changes for the City initiated western area
Comprehensive Plan amendments.
COMMUNITY DESIGN CHAPTER
Page 9 of 56 Section 2.5 Implementation Strategies
q. Identify a utility transmission corridor for all above ground utility transmission
lines in the City of Eagle and its impact area. Utility agencies shall be
encouraged to relocate existing above ground transmission lines to the utility
transmission line corridor. New substations should be encouraged to be within
the corridor and the existing substation on State Street in the Central Business
District is to be relocated out of the Central Business District. (See Map 2.2)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER
Page 12 of 56 Section 3.9 Implementation Strategies
f. Excessively large single entity businesses that would jeopardize the
competitive business environment of the downtown and CBD should be
located only within the regional commercial centero planned for the
northeast corner of U.S. Highway 20-26 (Chinden Boulevard) and the
future extension of State Highway 16.
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES CHAPTER
Page 22 of 56 Section 4.10.1 Electricity Implementation strategies
Third paragraph
As much as possible IPC facilities should be sited before development and should
provide sufficient buffers and setbacks from residential use. Context sensitive
setback should be discussed and utilized. Preference will be given to facilities
located outside of scenic corridors, the Central Business District, and the Village
Center and facilities may be considered within other commercial areas.
Page 1 of 3
2004 Comp Plan2
LAND USE CHAPTER
PARK LANE PLANNING AREA
Page 34 of 56 Section 6.5C.1 Uses
Fourth paragraph
Flint Drive shall be preserved as a residential street while properties abutting
State Street should include a mix of reential uses limited service commercial,
limited retail and office uses that promote trip capturing. Approximately three
acres at the northeast corner of State Street and Park Lane may be considered for
uses such as a convenience store with fuel sales, a maximum of two eating
establishments with drive thru and one full service financial institution.
Page 36 of 56 Section 6.5C.2 Design
Sixth paragraph
The Flint Estates area adjacent to State Highway 44 should be designed to
provide limited service commercial and limited retail uses that encourage
pedestrian circulation from the residential and high school areas, and to
compliment the existing mixed use areas at State Street and Park Lane (Camille
Beekman- i.e.: the manufacturing facility site south of State Street). The three
acres at the corner of State Street and Park Lane, which may be considered for
uses such as a convenience store with fuel sales, a maximum of two eating
establishments with drive thru and one full service financial institution, must
incorporate significant landscaping and efficient pedestrian circulation amenities.
Common building design elements for these uses will not be permitted. Design
elements for these uses must be exceptional and in accordance with Eagle's
design standards.
Page 36 of 56 Section 6.5C.3 Access
First paragraph
Access to and through should be limited to existing roads (i.e.: Old Valley Road,
Park Lane, and Linder Road): ne-deet access from State Street/Highway-44
shall be permitted unless a new access point is designated by the State of Idaho
for Eagle Island State Park: Access points must meet spacing requirements
determined by traffic engineering standards to be reviewed and approved by the
governmental agencies having jurisdiction. Shared access is to be encouraged
where practical. If a new access point is designated by the State of Idaho for
Eagle Island State Park a shared access across from the State Park access should
be encouraged and should be signalized.
Page 2 of 3
2004 Comp Plan2
LAND USE CHAPTER
EAGLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PLANNING AREA
Page 51 of 56 Section 6.5J.1 Uses
First Paragraph
Land use designations in the Eagle Middle School Planning Area Transitional
Residential, allowing 3 -units per acre with smaller lots adjacent to the school site
and transitioning to compatible lot sizes and scaling adjacent to the large lots at
the perimeter of the area.
Page 51 of 56 Section 6.5J.3 Design
Second paragraph
Higher den'sitie"s (2-3 units -per acre) with smaller lots adjacent to the Eagle
Middle School site transitioning into clustered and/or larger lots adjacent to
existing subdivisions.
Also please consider the following five changes to the land use plan. The areas are
numbered on the attached colored land use map (see attached).
Area #1 - Property north of State Street and west of Linder Road
Extend high-density residential area to property line at north versus going
through the property as shown.
Area #2 — Property south of State Street approximately 1800 feet west of Linder Road
Change land use designation from residential estates to residential one.
Area #3 — Property north of river both sides of Linder Road
Change land use designation from residential one to mixed use to follow
property lines versus going through several lots.
Area #4 — Calhoun Property on south side of Floating Feather
Change land use map from residential one to transitional residential as was
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Area #4 — Park Lane at Flint Drive
Assure allowance of new urbanism residential design (similar to the City
approved Alderwood subdivision).
Thank You.
Mark L. Butler
Page 3 of 3
2004 Comp Plant
Olt
August 25, 2004
Eagle City Council
Attn: Nichoel
PO Box 1520
Eagle, ID 83616
Dear Council Members:
St cc 8/30kg
It has recently been brought to our attention that there is a proposal to amend
Eagle's existing Comprehensive Plan by changing the properties along N. Eagle
Rd. from Idaho street to Mission drive from residential to a Central Business
District.
We are both located at 240 and 262 N. Eagle Rd and are concerned that this
amendment would promote businesses next door to us that could possibly cause
noise, lighting, parking and late hour delivery problems. One of us is elderly and
the other handicapped, so this would directly impact our quality of life.
Since there is no pending application to change this to a Central Business
District by any owners along this side of N. Eagle Rd., we request that the City
Council not approve this amendment to Eagle's Comprehensive Plan at this time.
Sincerely,
Maxine Carpenter
PO Box 787
240 N Eagle Rd
Greg Carpenter
PO Box 52
252 N Eagle Rd
Fife:
Route to:
RECEIVED & FILED ..
CITY OF EAGLE
AUG )2004
0e,
C Ep;dbq
ACHD Ada County Highway District
John S. Franden — President
David E. Wynkoop - 1st Vice President
Susan S Eastlake - 2nd Vice President
Sherry R Huber — Commissioner
David Bivens — Commissioner
City of Eagle
310 E. State St.
Eagle, ID 83616
RE: Proposed City of Eagle Western Area Plan
3775 Adams Street
Garden City ID 83714-6499
Phone (208) 387-6100
FAX (208) 387-6391
E-mail tellus«'ACHD.ada.id. us
August 30, 2004
Dear Mayor and Council:
Thank you for allowing ACHD to participate in the development of your Western Area Plan, which staff
generally supports at this time pending Ada County's approval of the Area of Impact expansion. We
look forward to working with the City of Eagle to achieve the goals of this Plan and fostering continued
cooperation between our agencies.
Note that the City of Star has also requested ACHD's input for a planned Area of Impact expansion
that overlaps portions of the Western Area Plan. ACHD remains neutral as it pertains to the Area of
Impact discussion between the City of Eagle, the City of Star and Ada County. Our comments are
strictly associated to transportation -related proposals included in each City's plan.
On July 27, ACHD staff met with your planning staff to review transportation aspects of the
Comprehensive Plan_ We received a copy of the entire proposed Plan on August 20 and have
reviewed it at the staff level. Currently, ACHD and the City of Eagle have a joint meeting scheduled for
September 7. We are submitting comments as part of your public hearing process and look forward to
discussing them at the joint meeting.
Below is a list of specific staff comments on the Comprehensive Plan as they relate to ACHD's system.
1. New Roadway Connections: ACHD's policies support connectivity of the transportation
system and any plans to improve and continue this effort is strongly supported. Below are
specific comments on new roadway connections proposed in chapter 5 and on the
Transportation/ Pathway Network map for the Western Planning Area.
■ East/West Boulevard: The concept of an East/West Boulevard can be
accomplished through the development process. This roadway is not eligible for
impact fee reimbursement through the Capital Improvements Plan; therefore it must
be financed by private development. The connection to SH16 must meet ITD's
access standards and any new roadways must meet ACHD's minimum standards.
Careful consideration should be given to the proposed intersection with Beacon
Light Road and Homer Road.
• New Collectors (Homer Extension, Ring/Frontage Roads): Collector roadways
not designated on the COMPASS Long -Range Functional Classification map will not
be required by ACHD as part of the development process. These proposed changes
will have to go through COMPASS for the next update of the functional classification
C:\Documents and Settings\dkostelec\Desktop\2004 Aug 26 Eagle Comp Plan Comments.doc
Created on 8/26/2004 1:14:00 PM
Page 1 of 3
map. ACHD will not oppose these connections if the city wishes to require them.
Such improvements will need to be funded by new development in the areas
identified by the Plan. We strongly support the City's Visioning that strives to
"preserve the function of regionally significant roadways" in the Eagle area. Ring
and frontage roads help achieve this goal. It is not ACHD's responsibility to pay for
and acquire frontage roads to the state highway system. ITD or the City of Eagle
should acquire the right-of-way to have the roads constructed to ACHD standards
prior to us accepting them into our system.
• State Highway 16 Extension: ACHD supports the extension of SH 16 across the
Boise River. It is assumed that this extension project will be led by ITD. ACHD is
preserving right-of-way to accommodate 5 lanes on both Black Cat and Ten Mile
Roads south of Chinden Boulevard (US 20/26) in preparation for one of those
corridors being designated as a connection to either a new interchange on 1-84 or a
new river crossing to SH16.
2. Existing Roadways:
• Beacon Light Road: This roadway should maintain its straight alignment to SH16
as proposed in the Transportation/ Pathway Network for the Western Planning Area.
• Floating Feather Road: ACHD supports a realignment of Floating Feather west of
Palmer and will be conducting an alignment study to determine a feasible route.
Floating Feather and Beacon Light are the only two east -west opportunities for
connectivity north of SH44 and should be preserved to serve as minor arterials in
the future. This connection may require re-classification of the roadway as a minor
arterial as it will eventually connect Can -Ada Road to SH55. We request that the
Transportation/ Pathway Network map be modified to show a proposed new
connection of Floating Feather that aligns with the section line west of SH16.
• Moon Valley Road: ACHD has received development applications within the past
year for residential subdivisions along this roadway. We are requiring 30 -feet of
pavement with gravel shoulder and barrow ditches within a 50' right-of-way.
Sidewalks and/or pathways are not part of these requirements. ACHD supports the
function of Moon Valley Road as a backage road to minimize access to SH44.
3. Sidewalks, Pathways and Landscaping:
• Sidewalks/Pathways: ACHD supports connectivity of the pedestrian and bicycle system
as proposed in the schematic cross-sections included in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Meandering sidewalks/pathways: ACHD supports meandering sidewalks and
pathways and will only accept those that are compliant with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines.
• Landscaping: ACHD looks to continued cooperation with City of Eagle as it relates to
license agreements for landscaping along roadways.
4. Access to Schools: ACHD supports the City's implementation strategies that elementary and
middle schools shall be located in residential areas. Direct vehicular access to arterial roadways
or section line roads that have the potential to become arterials in the future should be
prohibited.
C:1Documents and Settingsldkostelec\Desktop12004 Aug 26 Eagle Comp Plan Comments.doc
Created on 8/26/2004 1:14:00 PM
Page 2 of 3
We look forward to discussing these issues further at the September 7 joint meeting. If you or your staff
has any questions regarding ACHD's comments, please contact us.
Sincerely,
,s►
Don Kostelec
Supervisor
Planning, Programming & Cost Estimating
CC: ACHD Commissioners, Director & Managers (with Transportation/Pathway Network map)
City of Star
Ada County Development Services
Central Files / PPC Files
C.\Documents and Settings\dkostelec\Desktop\2004 Aug 26 Eagle Comp Plan Comments doc
Created on 8/26/2004 1:14 00 PM
Page 3 of 3
NAME
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
TELEPHONE SUBJECT YES/NO? PRO/CON
Page 1 f 1
H.ICOUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNU I . WPD
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
CHAPTER 2: COMMUNITY DESIGN
ADDRESS/ TESTI FY
NAME TELEPHONE
My ku`Qb\ 51- Ni 2N1)c)7
SUBJECT
Page 1 f 1
1I \COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
YES/NO? PRO/CON
I V E>
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
CHAPTER 3: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
d1�\"`AMIE TTELEPHOONE SUBJECT YES/NO? PRO/CON
1 -c. 0016\ 7 )tv ? i (A1P-GG----4,1ASc.) 1 CGutlk(sv/'
Page 1 f 1
H.\COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
NAME
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES &
SERVICES
ADDRESS/
TELEPHONE
SUBJECT
Page 1 f 1
H:\COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
CHAPTER 5: TRANSPORATION
ADDRESS/
NAME TELEPHONE SCBJF.CI'
1.gwey p
I/p. Sa lc tij.,, 2 si r
efg41
GF, i �a1sY,1•� 727)
3A41-€.6,1/4.1 Lc6
Page 1 f 1
H 1COUNCIL\AGENDAICCSIGNUP WPD
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON
Akkkai
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
CHAPTER 6: LAND USE— GENERAL
ADDRESS/
,NAME TELEPHONE
f'"cu,2-f off/1/44 �ca
3LitP Riatatul
4d,OaLt_ 11„— 7`) 3
oe�I�
,E?:.).3/1 1;Zr . ( /zed
,E
as i— h'.iis 7
939 eq -r6
SUBJECT
i)74r -f-
I/ it/ C oykforn ri-\ 0
LLQ
7 9 776
'e /111,0Fel:M.S,
X01 U) (f( M)
tt :4 . A ztt �r / C Jf L GL/,t
Vis/ "(J) �'��� c11 . J ✓� `�L� c
v
kke.j, aid -LA L -.61 -'ILL .k! i_.c, /( i(G% Z!'jL /la", r (',/i, rr/�
1 C uctai J to
C
Page 1 f 1
H.\COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
v
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON
ufat -C/c:x?eS
cf�-S
U CAYY1
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
RIM VIEW PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/
NAME TELEPHONE SUBJECT
'-8/7/1i;b1.1"1-1 Ur
• &./zipc'.1 7rc 5 & ,LE57.)
0AQ etk too "ZA., 4c:' -q
'44;) 7Tcf-2 04)
Ati(kg 01-c g - -5(,..y
772
-/ /1--ti/ekt4_ of S��CG �p ttL
_ 44/t/Kaitrzi)c4,° /3 eirv-e7))
Av->24,nki)L.,., / ,'S-4' iattl- WI- -›/
S
/rn,a , IF 1 VttC_ I S7 ZS K' -GS D
P7a' 795 Pr;ur 46:4Lbj
V, 26,4y10,,, 9 /� IPi7fe,t,
Au-P-vd4o1
"?3i.i .
Alowl
pi 6)-0 Cl
eetniteitt-
Li` I I b( 1) 0 N.a,&,v. -
kthae-- 1,4(// >/x" 4•c"= €lt 4,, 4'//l 'f
L6 j ek S00/Ar160 E t OG/2n Q b
1,7-(7/44d- ,� j,-&o�'�6°6) H.K'OUNCGL'N A\C
IL\ACSIGNUP.wpi)
f6tilv �Ic.,)L .2663
TESTIFY
YES/NO?
`("5
A/o
Ye
.tic
PRO/CON
Cin
Cc. tA
CEng
Ce-
eu
Cc��
n
S S 22
2Z g2
4t/4 /»M
•
G
ifAae
1Q11,6Y1/
//4 / %Y
GIeQk' vve �%r .
/ 02 /f c 4r1.4e7)
1)
1,14
rpidc
'ZIA \I Cev\I
to tt--topi-
avae
/43 Lba_RietA,,
o'z abuiAiop
tb2(;(1
r,,Vtre:
atd e
ki-AA
N�
Co--
) (6-')\
14,40,A,k Lew )
/44,A/A.)-r//
14
�
aqatsl
11
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT EXPANSION
/NAME
/:////,'C'
fix,-
✓'PlA r -R 1c� Z%1
/IA 1-Zelito
pave. 50/4.4
ADDRESS/
TELEPHONE
//(:)
•
f(la g;? ./
SUBJECT
.3
t2t/0 N , 6 A..c
tki
/5
/MD et4/) i
Page 1 f 1
H.ICOUNCILIAGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
(,Z
TESTIFY
YES/NO?
PRO/CON
Pri
Pc)
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
EAGLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/
TELEPHONE
Rs9 -
lob/
Q3� -47'Z
/0 6/ /.)�
2br•701/ 14 •
,}
// 5 3 iLeLL»/t J(c,D
-:<,�. rte,, u�.i4•« -
) e'�,C ✓�
SUBJECT
Afid
0
6.143
Page 1 f 1
H-\COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPI)
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON
//lc I �v 2✓
6)
(6 -
P-1'0
NAME
(, tuts
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
PARK LANE PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/
TELEPHONE
VW -7o17
v_Gs tkhu/4`(
J- '2/70
r
e/t/7ga 0
GfESTIFY
SUBJECT, - YES/NO?
Page 1 f 1
11.\COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPI)
Ye -s
740.4,
PRO/CON
Js*
2-0
NAME
,01412---N
rk l!t
1-(A
l 6/1/71-t
CPA-3-03/RZ-8-03 Park Hampton, LLC.
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
ADDRESS/
TELEPHONE SUBJECT
3 � ti 240 5(
S76._ eci5`,'
/60 -Wq �I
TESTIFY
YES/NO?
✓ ��, at) / 1?/x)i34 ( I lc / (/-at
U5TV1) /J j,' 4/ 3 S v 5,4r620 I �C v(MO&.1,
g��
` ).)n G1 iAYBii) 9aLu` / c o) � DLO R e frt
S4x/S-I`�f
(Ai Eve 1 / y u S . 1F.
kfrk.ltiS .c6,Ljoar
33q I Ftrnf g.)f
1 V(-14_
(0
3 ct 1 S ft apt- i>r 1 v/2- hce4I
0,6,/
F ly k tto It
Page 1 f 1
1I.1COUNCIL\AGENDAICCSIGN U P.WPD
1(�%J
65
YE S
e5
J
Ycz
PRO/CON
k-6
�(l
rr-'
'9iU
NAME
,
L4tuQ
pt(f u Glx
Aimit
\.4z -tri 71X606
CPA-1-03/RZ-7-03 Gregory Hall
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
ADDRESS/
TELEPHONE
/
T� NIK,O5r
SUBJECT
.r//) iI J
OC 1Z - 5 Z eoG P I L,c,fo
ZZ 3 AJ Ea,r�
// U
Page 1 r 1
H:\COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
313
TESTIFY
YES/N09 PRO/CON
A/0
CPA -2-03 Musick
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
ADDRESS/
NAME TELEPHONE
f\kRll u,(2� 5 ti�w� Sr
SUBJECT I�
iPtec/
Page 1 f 1
1-L\COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
3G
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON
19kp I
I I
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
FLOATING FEATHER PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
NAME TELEPHONE SUBJECT YES/NO?
X39 -47('o9- /
C14/ -f -r -.)610.12 -Cit /cY?/&,
T,u j �3Y-dJ-ow
/' 'cj j s H /i b vN; 11 E ,Ji. 110ra))- 0- 5 /C -1 eS /
I( 1 /. ?1-. (1
Page 1 f 1
H \COUNCIL AGENDA\CCSIGNUP \VPD
PRO/CON
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
MOON VALLEY & STATE PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/
NAME TELEPHONE SUBJECT
" f"“) n0( -1,5I 2;Y- 27‘4e SY/E
Page 1 f 1
H \COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSKGNUP.WPD
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON
NAME
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
RIVER PLAIN PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
TELEPHONE SUBJECT YES/NO? PRO/CON
) e'Ry OR -0 \f t 01=-4)
iaN\Sc.(1`
M4 MPS ►FS
rr/ ret -X7
Page 1 f 1
H \COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
NAME
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
CHINDEN ROAD PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/ TESTIFY
TELEPHONE SUBJECT YES/NO? PRO/CON
Page 1 f 1
H•1COUNCILIAGENDA\CCSIGNUP WPD
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
EAGLE ISLAND PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/
NAME TELEPHONE SUBJECT
cl E(A*Z
Page 1 f 1
H.\COUNCIL\AGENDA\CCSIGNUP. W PD
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON
CPA -2-04
Soaring 2025: Western Area Plan
PUBLIC HEARING
THE CITY OF EAGLE
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2004
6:30 P.M.
VILLAGE PLANNING AREA
ADDRESS/
NAME TELPHONE
340D �
'i �% - o1-1 1`5
J o I-- Rick °M-0 3 ��
SUBJECT
kti9 ) 1
FATrr`N— DE.35c`*`lISGr-(Fir karLAt
1/
Page 1 f 1
11 \COUN('IL\AGENDA1CCSIGNUP WPD
TESTIFY
YES/NO? PRO/CON