Findings - PZ - 1989 - Changes to comp plan - Changes To Comp Plan As Recommended
CITY OF EAGLE
IN THE MATTER OF: )
)
EAGLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1989)
)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT:
I. On February 6, 1989, the ~agle Planning and Zoning held a
public hearing regarding the changes to the Eagle Comprehensive
Plan, 1989. Notice of hearing was published on January 18,
1989, as required by Section 67-6509, Idaho Code.
2. There was no public testimony in favor or opposition given.
A letter was received by Ada County Development indicating no
opposition to proposed amendments to the plan.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
I. The application for changes to the comprehensive plan
complies with the requirements of law.
2. Public hearing was held in,order to receive testimony of the
public regarding any changes.
3. Eagle Planning and Zoning recommended the changes to Eagle
City Council.
4.
The changes recommended are as follows:
A. PURPOSE AND SCOPE: L. Develop and enhance the Boise
River Greenbelt and Riv~r TrAil wiLh the aiL¥ of Eagle and
it's impact area ~ provided tæ tJw Boise River Plan.
B. PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACES: Paragraph 2,
Open space is land which is not used for buildings or
structure and offers opportunities for parks, recreation,
water supply greenbelt-river trial, tourism, leisure
pursuits and interest, and resource and economic
development. - - -
C. PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACES: No.3. Set aside
for perpetual public enjoYment and adequate amount of open
space such as natural river frontage, greenbelt-river trail,
creeks, drainage ways, buffers, flood plains, wooded areas
and viewpoints.
D. TRANSPORTATION-POLICIES AND GOALS: 11. Encourage
development of a by-pass road south of the commercial
center. 11. Developers of property located adjacent to
arterial hiqhwavs ~d state street, should ~ responsible
for providing means for internal traffic çirculation and
assurinq access to adiacent properties throuqh the use Qi
such gevices ÊÊ frontage or collector ~oads, clustering
-'---..------- -'--"--'-----'--'- .,---
FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW
PAGE 2
development activities, shared access, setbacks for future
rights-of-way, and provisions ~r turn~, turn lanes, and
~~. 1]. Permit airports within the area of City
impact only in zones in which airports are permitted uses.
E. COMMUNITY DESIGN-POLICIES AND GOALS: No.2. The City
Limits shall be that area as defined by the Eagle Policy
Diagram Map. No. 3. Th~ design of the Commercial Zones
shall conform to the design review ordinance consisting
largely of government, commercial, and community buildings.
F. LAND USE-RESIDENTIAL/POLICIES AND GOALS: No.1. The
residential densities in the City Limits shall not exceed
twenty-five (25) units per acre. No.2. Densities within
the Urban Service Planning area and outside of the City
Limits shall not exceed five (5) units per acre. No.5.
DELETED.
G. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITY USES-
POLICIES AND GOALS: No.2. A major retial center shall be
encouraged with the City Limits of Eagle shall be encouraged
commensurate with the needs of the community residents.
H. POPULATION: 1987/5,757, 1990/7,094, 2000/9,091.
I. PUBLIC SERVICES, FACILITIES AND UTILITIES- POLICY AND
GOAL: New residential developments shall be required to
provide adequate fire protection.
5. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend the
changes to Eagle City Council, and to be presented to the City
Cou=il at too Council m~ ::::l~ Februa~ 28, 1989.
ADOPTED THIS d.i day of , 1989.
!
APPROVED: ATTEST:
---/ ~.,
~~"~
DAR WATSON
CHAIRMAN P&Z
~-
EAGLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF THE MARCH 6, 1989 MEETING
The Eagle Planning & Zoning Commission met in regular session on
March 6, 1989. Chairman WATSON presiding.
Roll call showed the following members present:
SINCLAIR.
NYBORG, EASON,
Motion made by NYBORG and seconded by SINCLAIR to approve the
Minutes of the February 21, +989 meeting. All Aye: Motion
carried.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Eagle Ranch 2 Subdivision
Representative: Robert DeShazo. Wants to develope 1 1/3 acres
within the subdivision, across from Dogwood Place, off Ranch Dr.
The area has been designated on the orignial plat as PLAYGROUND.
The plat was recorded in 1976 and the area has remained
undeveloped. There has not been an association formed in the
past to initiate a playground development.
Public Testimony:
Robert Banks: Could accept development to the land if the
charactor of the subdivision remains unchanged. Is interested
in standard street requirements, curbs and gutters, as well as
sidewalks and drainage problems. Desires it to remain
archetectualy compatable with other homes in the area.
David Allen: Submitted documentation to the commission regarding
past minutes, covenents and plats of the area. Believes the area
should remain playground designated.
Mike Roach: Bought his home with the assumption that the area in
question would be a playground. He believes many of the others
thought the same upon purchase of their homes.
Bill Decker: Would object to a 2 story home built there, that
would enable the buyer to obstruct the current occupant's
privacy. Would like to see the ~otal package house plan.
Billie Compton: NYBORG read into record a letter received by Ms.
Compton endorsing the subdivision. Ms. Compton is opposed to a
park or playground.
Public Hearing closed.
Moved by SINCLAIR and seconded by NYBORG to approve the
subdivision request with the conditions that the street within
the subdivision mets the requirements of the Ada County Highway
Dept, and that the subdivision complies with the Design Review
Standards as set forth in Section 9-3-2 (2&3) of the Eagle City
EAGI.E PI.ANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MARCH 6, 1989
PAGE 2
Code.
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS:
following recommendations:
Discussion resulted in the
1. Add: Office Security Facility: Cl,C2,C3,M1,M2 and R
(conditional Uses only) (Office that contains living quarters not
~o exceed one family dwelling, that is used on the property that
requires 24 hr. security.
2. Indoor Entertainment Facility: Defined as a facility that
houses movies, bowling, indoor swimming pools, billiards, pool,
video centers, etc.
3. Outdoor Entertainment Facility: Defined as an area that
contains an outdoor swimming pool, baseball, go-cart-tracks, etc.
4. Airport: Omit any other wording added to airport as
definition is clear.
Moved by SINCLAIR and seconded by NYBORG to adjourn the meeting
at this point.
Respectfully submitted:
iJ
0'
Daryl Watson, Chairman
~,tt1 ¡;~~U88,.,.
..".,~ l' ',' ,i'::' '-"'~
::.,~>,','" , ,co,",':"" . ,,' ," '~"
.. 1.., " , ,.
.::- - ' ',;, , , ' > '::"
ii "0'" ':,
~,
-
~
-
:.
..
..
\~:;:;" " " " " :..v>
'q"U:¡D..~'.'
Approved: